Search

Background: Intravenous fluid administration and prophylactic vasopressor infusion are the primary methods for preventing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension during cesarean delivery. However, evidence regarding the impact of different volumes of crystalloid solution on the phenylephrine infusion dosage for preventing this hypotension remains inconclusive. This study aimed to determine the effect of two IV fluid infusion rates (10 or 20 mL/kg/h) on phenylephrine requirement for preventing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension., Methods: Eighty healthy parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either 10 mL/kg/h (group 10) or 20 mL/kg/h (group 20) of lactated Ringer's solution. The first patient in each group received 0.5 µg/kg/min of phenylephrine infusion immediately after intrathecal injection. The phenylephrine dose in subsequent patients was adjusted by increments or decrements of 0.05 µg/kg/min based on the previous patient's response. The ED50 of phenylephrine infusion for preventing spinal-induced hypotension for cesarean delivery was estimated using a modified up-down sequential analysis, with probit analysis applied as a backup sensitivity analysis., Results: The ED50 values for preventing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension were 0.30 µg/kg/min (95% CI, 0.29-0.32 µg/kg/min) for group 10, and 0.19 µg/kg/min (95% CI, 0.16-0.22 µg/kg/min) for group 20, respectively. The estimated relative potency for phenylephrine in group 10 compared to group 20 was 1.52 (95%CI, 1.24-1.97), showing a significant difference in the ED50 values between the two groups., Conclusion: This study found that a higher crystalloid co-loading rate significantly reduces prophylactic phenylephrine requirement for preventing spinal anesthesia induced hypotension., Trials Registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=125918 (Trial number: ChiCTR2100048002)., Competing Interests: Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate The Ethical Committee of Jiaxing University Affiliated Women and Child Hospital approved this study and provided the certificate (No. 2021-19) on May 21, 2021. All patients involved in this study were informed and all of them signed a written informed consent. Initiation of patient enrollment was on July 1, 2021. Consent for publication Not applicable. Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: High spinal block is a serious complication of spinal anesthesia. However, findings regarding its associated risk factors are inconsistent, and no studies have reported a relevant risk prediction score. We aimed to determine the risk prediction score for high spinal block in patients who were induced spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery., Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a hospital in Southern Thailand between 2019 and 2020. We recorded demographic characteristics, gestational age (GA), hyperbaric bupivacaine dose, sensory block level, pre- and post-procedure blood pressure, and birth weight. High spinal block was defined as a decrease in pinprick sensation > T4. Risk scores, adjusted odds ratios (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were determined. Risk scores were derived from the coefficients of the final multivariate logistic regression model., Results: The incidence of high spinal block was 22.4% among the 1003 parturients. Our risk prediction tool for high spinal block had a sensitivity and specificity of 76% and 49%, respectively, and was classified into high (> 21), intermediate (15-21), and low (≤ 14) risk groups. The patient-related predictors were a GA < 35 weeks (OR [95% CI]: 2.31 [1.13, 4.71], score of 8), height < 150 cm (2.21 [1.11, 4.38], score of 8), and post-pregnancy body mass index > 27.5 kg/m 2 (2.68 [1.33, 5.41], score of 10). The anesthesia-related predictors were a hyperbaric bupivacaine dose > 11 mg (2.56 [1.34, 4.87], score of 9) and induction by a first-year resident (1.48 [1.05, 2.09], score of 4). The surgery-related predictors were previous cesarean delivery in labor (1.83 [1.2, 2.78], score of 6) and elective cesarean delivery (2.53 [1.57, 4.07], score of 9) compared to indication by cephalopelvic disproportion. The incidence of intraoperative hypotension was significantly higher in the high-block group than in the control group (46% vs. 25%, p < 0.001)., Conclusion: The combination of patient- and anesthesia-related predictors played an important role in the intermediate- and high-risk groups for high sensory spinal block. Addressing the modifiable risk factors-a GA < 35 weeks, an optimal dose of bupivacaine, and the experience level of the spinal block performer-could minimize the risk of high spinal block during cesarean delivery., Competing Interests: Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate The study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand, Chairperson Assoc. Prof. Boonsin Tangtrakulwanich, REC 64–080-8–4 on April 23, 2021. The requirement for informed consent to participate was waived. Consent for publication Not applicable. Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

To explore the value of ultrasound in volume assessment during the perioperative period of single-shot spinal anesthesia for total hip arthroplasty. A total of 100 patients undergoing elective surgery under spinal anesthesia at our hospital from January 2022 to January 2024 were selected. Transthoracic echocardiography was used to measure the diameter of the abdominal aorta (Ao) before anesthesia (T1), 10 minutes after anesthesia (T2), and 30 minutes after anesthesia (T3). The inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVC-CI) and the ratio of IVCe to Ao (IVCe/Ao) were calculated. A volume load test was performed 10 minutes after anesthesia. Based on the increase in stroke volume (ΔSV) after the volume load test, patients were divided into a volume-responsive group (ΔSV ≥ 15%) and a volume-nonresponsive group (ΔSV < 15%). The reliability of inferior vena cava parameters in predicting hypotension after spinal anesthesia and the value in predicting volume responsiveness postanesthesia were evaluated using ROC curves. A total of 100 patients were enrolled, 18 were withdrawn, and a total of 82 patients were included. After the volume load test, the parameters of the volume response group and the volume nonresponse group were basically consistent, and the difference was not statistically significant (P > .05). The SV of volume reaction group was significantly higher than that of volume no reaction group (P < .05). The incidence of hypotension in the volume response group was higher than that in the non-volume response group (51.28% vs 11.63%, χ2 = 15.174, P < .01). The AUC for volume reactivity prediction using IVCe, IVCi, IVC-CI, and IVCe/Ao were 0.62, 0.71, 0.70, and 0.72, respectively. IVCi, IVC-CI, and IVCe/Ao were significant predictors of volume reactivity (P < .05). The AUC predicting persistent hypotension after spinal anesthesia using IVCe, IVCi, IVC-CI, and IVCe/Ao were 0.78, 0.79, 0.70, and 0.84, respectively. IVCe, IVCi, IVC-CI, and IVCe/Ao can predict volume reactivity before anesthesia. IVCi, IVC-CI, and IVCe/Ao predicted persistent hypotension in patients with spinal anesthesia after anesthesia, and IVCe/Ao showed the best predictive effect. Thus, IVCe/Ao is a reliable parameter for predicting persistent hypotension and assessing volumetric reactivity., Competing Interests: The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

In current clinical practice, spinal anesthesia and analgesia techniques-including epidural and subarachnoid procedures-are frequently executed without imaging like X-ray or epidurography. Unrecognized spinal pathology has resulted in serious morbidity in the context of performing neuraxial anesthesia. Typically, preoperative consultations incorporate a patient's medical history but lack a detailed spinal examination or consideration of recent MRI or CT scans. In contrast, within the domain of pain clinics, a multidisciplinary approach involving anesthesiologists and neuroradiologists is common. Such collaborative settings rely on exhaustive clinical history and scrutinization of recent imaging studies, which may influence the decision to proceed with invasive spinal interventions. There are no epidemiological data concerning rates of the different baseline pathologies that would potentially pose morbidity risks from neuraxial procedures, but the most common among these is canal stenosis, which significantly affects almost 20% of people over 60 years of age. This paper aims to elucidate these critical findings and advocate for incorporating meticulous preoperative assessments for individuals slated for spinal anesthesia or analgesia procedures, thereby attempting to mitigate potential risks., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© American Society of Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with hypotension in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) under spinal anesthesia., Method: A total of 200 patients (50-75 years of age) who underwent elective TKA under spinal anesthesia between October 2023 and January 2024 were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups (hypotensive and nonhypotensive) depending on the occurrence of postspinal anesthesia hypotension (PSAH). Patient characteristics (age, sex, body mass index, and medical history), blood pressure, heart rate, and ultrasound data before anesthesia were documented. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine risk factors for hypotension after spinal anesthesia. Furthermore, a nomogram was constructed according to independent predictive factors. The area under the curve (AUC) and calibration curves were employed to assess the performance of the nomogram., Results: In total, 175 patients were analyzed and 79 (45.1%) developed PSAH. Logistic regression analysis revealed that variability of the inferior vena cava (odds ratio, OR, 1.147; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.090-1.207; p < 0.001) and systolic arterial blood pressure (SABP, OR 1.078; 95% CI: 1.043-1.115; p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for PSAH. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that the AUC of the inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVCCI) and SABP alone were 0.806 and 0.701, respectively, while the AUC of both combined was 0.841. Specifically, an IVCCI of > 37.5% and systolic arterial blood pressure of > 157 mm Hg were considered threshold values. Furthermore, we found that the combination had a better predictive value with higher AUC value, sensitivity, and specificity than the index alone. The nomogram model and calibration curves demonstrated the satisfactory predictive performance of the model., Conclusion: Elevated preoperative systolic arterial blood pressure and a higher IVCCI were identified as independent risk factors for hypotension in patients receiving spinal anesthesia, which may help guide personalized treatment., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Background: This study compares dexmedetomidine and buprenorphine as potential adjuvants for spinal anesthesia. Dexmedetomidine enhances sensory block and minimizes the need for pain medication, while buprenorphine, a long-acting opioid, exhibits a favorable safety profile compared to traditional opioids., Methods: PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE were systematically searched in December 2023., Eligibility Criteria: RCTs with patients scheduled for lower abdominal, pelvic, or lower limb surgeries; undergoing spinal anesthesia with a local anesthetic and buprenorphine or dexmedetomidine., Results: Eight RCTs involving 604 patients were included. Compared with dexmedetomidine, buprenorphine significantly reduced time for sensory regression to S1 (Risk Ratio [RR = -131.28]; 95% CI -187.47 to -75.08; I 2 = 99%) and motor block duration (RR = -118.58; 95% CI -170.08 to -67.09; I 2 = 99%). Moreover, buprenorphine increased the onset time of sensory block (RR = 0.42; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.81; I 2 = 93%) and increased the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (RR = 4.06; 95% CI 1.80 to 9.18; I ² = 0%). No significant differences were observed in the duration of analgesia, onset time of motor block, time to achieve the highest sensory level, shivering, hypotension, or bradycardia., Conclusions: The intrathecal administration of buprenorphine, when compared to dexmedetomidine, is linked to reduction in the duration of both sensory and motor blocks following spinal anesthesia. Conversely, buprenorphine was associated with an increased risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting and a longer onset time of sensory block. Further high-quality RCTs are essential for a comprehensive understanding of buprenorphine's effects compared with dexmedetomidine in spinal anesthesia., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Published by Elsevier España S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Background: Intra-operative pain during Caesarean delivery (PDCD) is the leading cause of successful litigation against obstetric anaesthesiologists. PDCD may require conversion to general anaesthesia (GA). The aim of this analysis is to assess our incidence of PDCD and associated GA conversion., Methods: Data were collected from electronic patient records. Data included baseline demographics, incidence of PDCD and rates of GA conversion, proportion of PDCD cases attributable to failed epidural (EA) or spinal anaesthesia (SA), and level of sensory and motor blockade in cases of PDCD. Results were audited against current standards set by the Royal College of Anaesthetists 'rates of PDCD should be <5% for category 4, <15% for categories 2-3, and <20 % for category 1 CD ' and that 'rates of conversion to GA due to neuraxial complications should be <1% for category 4, <5% for categories 2-3 and <15% for category 1 patients'., Results: During the 12-month study period, 2,429 patients underwent CD, of whom 52 (2.1%) experienced PDCD. The incidence of PDCD was 3.1% (41/1,309) for category 1-3 patients, while 1% (11/1,120) of category 4 patients experienced PDS. Of the 52 patients with PDCD, 17 patients required GA (33%). SA was used in 24/52 (47%) cases and EA in 28/52 (53%) cases. The median level of sensory block in patients with PDCD was located at the T4 dermatome, the median level of motor block was Bromage level 2., Conclusions: PDCD occurred in 2.1% of CD, one-third required conversion to GA. Most patients experiencing PDCD met current motor and sensory blockade criteria., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Existing evidence of the effect of spinal anesthesia (SA) on cardiac systolic function is scarce and inconclusive. This study aimed to evaluate the effects induced by a single injection of SA for elective vascular surgery on left (LV) and right (RV) ventricular systolic performance using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). A prospective study. Single-center study, university hospital. Adult patients undergoing elective vascular surgery with SA. During patients' evaluations fluid administration was targeted using arterial waveform monitoring. All patients underwent TTE studies before and after SA induction for the assessment of indices reflective of LV and RV systolic function. Blood samples were drawn to measure troponin and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels. A total of 62 patients (88.7% males, 71.00 ± 9.42 years) were included in the study. The primary outcome was the difference before and after SA in LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE). In total population, LVEF significantly increased after SA 53.07% [16.51]vs 53.86% [13.28]; p < 0.001). End-systolic volume (ESV, 69.50 [51.50] vs. 65.00 [29.50] ml; p < 0.001) decreased while stroke volume (SV) insignificantly increased (70.51 ± 16.70 vs. 73.00 ± 18.76 ml; p = 0.131) during SA. TAPSE remained unchanged (2.23 [0.56] vs. 2.25 [0.69] mm; p = 0.558). In patients with impaired compared to those with preserved LV systolic function, the changes evidenced in LVEF (7.49 ± 4.15 vs. 0.59 ± 2.79; p < 0.001), ESV (-18.13 ± 18.20 vs-1.53 ± 9.09; p < 0.001) and SV (8.71 ± 11.96 vs-1.43 ± 11.89; p = 0.002) were greater. This study provides evidence that SA in patients undergoing elective vascular surgery improved LV systolic function, while changes in RV systolic function are minimal., Competing Interests: Declarations Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.)

Background: The optimal anesthetic mode in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has yet to be clearly identified. Patients undergoing TJA may recieve spinal anesthesia (SA) or general anesthesia (GA). While arthroplasty literature indicates differences in postoperative morbidity, hip fracture literature does not show clear superiority of SA or GA. The purpose of this study was to further investigate this relationship and determine if there is a significant difference in morbidity and mortality between GA and SA in patients undergoing primary total joint arthroplasty., Methods: Patients undergoing primary THA or TKA from February 2007 to February 2021 were retrospectively reviewed, creating four cohorts: THA/GA (n = 1,266), THA/SA (n = 1,084), TKA/GA (n = 882), and THA/SA (n = 2,067). Readmission within 90 days, mortality within 365 days, and thromboembolic events within 30 days postoperatively were compared using logistic regression, controlling for age, body mass index, and Charlson Comorbidity Index., Results: The odds of experiencing a deep venous thrombosis within 30 days postoperatively were elevated in the analysis of both the THA/GA (odds ratio (OR) = 3.1; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.5 to 7.0; P = .004) and the TKA/GA (OR = 1.9; 95% CI: 1.2 to 3.0; P = .005) groups. Similarly, the risk of pulmonary embolism as higher in the THA/GA cohort (OR = 3.9; 95% CI: 1.2 to 17.3; P = .04). There were also higher odds of mortality within 365 days postoperatively in THA/GA patients (OR = 4.3; 95% CI: 1.7 to 13.0; P = .004). No other differences existed among TKA patients., Conclusions: Based upon these data, both SA and GA are reasonable options for primary TKA with similar risk profiles. However, GA may be associated with higher rates of deep venous thrombosis in TJA and pulmonary embolism in THA. General anesthesia (GA) was also loosely associated with increased mortality within 1 year of THA, but this result should be considered with caution., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Phenylephrine infusion is recommended to prevent spinal hypotension during cesarean delivery (CD) but may be associated with dose-dependent side effects. We hypothesized that adding intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) of the lower legs to a variable-rate phenylephrine infusion will reduce the dose of phenylephrine required during CD., Methods: Seventy-six healthy women undergoing elective CD under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia were randomly assigned to IPC or control groups (n = 38 per group). After spinal anesthesia, IPC of the lower legs was initiated in the IPC group, and all women received a phenylephrine infusion starting at 25 μg·min -1 and increasing by 16.7 μg·min -1 for systolic blood pressure (SAP) < 90% baseline. If hypotension (SAP < 80% baseline) occurred, 100 μg phenylephrine bolus was administered. The primary outcome was the dose of phenylephrine per minute., Results: The dose of phenylephrine per minute (34.4 ± 7.3 μg·min -1 vs. 40.9 ± 9.5 μg·min -1 , P = 0.001; mean difference -6.6 μg·min -1 , 95% CI -10.5 to -2.7 μg·min -1 ) and the incidence of hypotension (24% vs. 55%, P = 0.005) were lower in the IPC group than in the control group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the total dose of phenylephrine (603.2 ± 217.1 μg vs. 706.2 ± 247.5 μg, P = 0.058; mean difference -102.9 μg, 95% CI -209.4 to 3.5 μg), maternal side effects, or neonatal outcomes., Conclusions: Intermittent pneumatic compression combined with a variable-rate phenylephrine infusion reduced the phenylephrine dose per minute and the incidence of hypotension during CD under spinal anesthesia., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

This case report highlights a unique instance of spinal myoclonus after neuraxial anesthesia. It aims to inform anesthesiology providers, enhancing their ability to identify, manage, and potentially prevent similar outcomes in patients at risk., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 International Anesthesia Research Society.)

Background: Data on the association between the plain ropivacaine dose and maternal hypotension during cesarean delivery are limited. Thus, this study aimed to explore this association., Methods: This retrospective study included patients undergoing cesarean sections under spinal or combined spinal-epidural anesthesia with plain ropivacaine at The First Hospital of Fuyang, Hangzhou, China, between 2018 and 2022. Data were obtained from the anesthesia information management system. Liner trend tests were used to distinguish the linear relationship between spinal hypotension and the plain ropivacaine dose, and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to calculate the dose threshold. Logistic regression was used to adjust for confounders. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the stability of the results. The secondary outcome was vasopressor use (metaraminol and ephedrine)., Results: In total, 1,219 women were included. The incidence of hypotension linearly correlated with the plain ropivacaine dose (adjusted P -value for trend, P  < 0.001). Thus, we used a dose threshold of 17.5 mg to compare the dose as a binary variable (≥17.5 mg vs. < 17.5 mg). Plain ropivacaine doses of ≥17.5 mg were associated with a higher incidence of spinal hypotension (adjusted odds ratio: 2.71; 95% confidence interval [1.85-3.95]; P  < 0.001). The sensitivity analyses yielded similar results. The plain ropivacaine dose also correlated with metaraminol use but not ephedrine use., Conclusions: The incidence of spinal-induced hypotension in women undergoing cesarean section linearly correlated with the plain ropivacaine dose. The dose threshold for hypotension risk was 17.5 mg., Competing Interests: The authors declare there are no competing interests., (©2024 Li et al.)

Background: Shock index (SI) is calculated as heart rate divided by systolic blood pressure. In the obstetric population, SI of ≥ 0.9 is associated with maternal adverse outcomes. Our primary aim was to investigate the association between SI and post-spinal hypotension in non-elective cesarean section., Methods: In this prospective, observational study, term parturient of ASA physical status II, and urgency categories 2 and 3, undergoing non-elective cesarean section with spinal anesthesia were enrolled. We performed univariable and multivariable logistic regression to explore the association between baseline SI (categorized as < 0.9 and ≥ 0.9) and hypotension after spinal anesthesia. The diagnostic ability of the baseline SI to predict post-spinal hypotension was assessed using ROC (receiver operating characteristics) curves., Results: Three hundred forty-two parturient were recruited, and among them, 335 were analyzed. One hundred fifty-five (46.27%) parturients developed post-spinal hypotension, and 114 (34.03%) reported post-delivery hypotension. Preoperative SI (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.77; 95% CI, 1.15-6.66; p = 0.023) and thoracic sensory block height > 4 (AOR, 2.33; 95%CI, 1.14-4.76; p = 0.020) were associated with post-spinal hypotension. Preoperative SI (AOR, 4.34; 95%CI, 1.72-10.94; p = 0.002) and anxiety (AOR,1.22; 95%CI, 1.06-1.40; p = 0.004) were associated with post-delivery hypotension. Area under the ROC curve for SI alone in predicting hypotension before and after delivery was 0.53 (95%CI 0.49-0.57) and 0.56 (95%CI 0.51-0.60) respectively. However, the model performance as reflected by ROC curve for the multivariable logistic regression analysis was 0.623 for post-spinal hypotension and 0.679 for post-delivery hypotension, respectively., Conclusion: In parturients undergoing non-elective cesarean section, baseline SI ≥ 0.9 was associated with post-spinal and post-delivery hypotension. While the SI alone showed limited predictive power for post-spinal and post-delivery hypotension, integrating it with other risk factors improved the model's predictive ability., Trial Registration: Registration number: NCT04692870. Date of registration: 05/01/2021. Website: https://clinicaltrials.gov ., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

To prospectively investigate the effect of music therapy on patient's anxiety and pain level during retrograde intrarenal surgery under spinal anesthesia. 286 patients aged above 18 years, who underwent Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) under spinal anesthesia for renal or ureteral calculi were evaluated between January 2023 and June 2023 by a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical protocol. Patients were randomized into 2 groups. Group 1 included patients, who listened to music, and Group 2 was comprised of patients, who were not allowed to listen to music. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) results and pain sensation, anxiety level, together with the results of State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), a self-reported anxiety inventory, were captured. The number of patients, who were randomized to the music group (Group 1) and non-music group (Group 2) was 144 and 142, respectively. Mean heart rate in Group 1 and Group 2 was 60 ± 4.19 and 70 ± 8.36, respectively (p = 0.02), indicative of the fact that mean heart rate was significantly lower in the music group. Heart rate measured post-operatively within the first hour subsequent to the procedure was similar in both groups (p < 0.05). The VAS score was significantly lower in Group 1. STAI score in Group 1 and Group 2 was 45.51 ± 2.968 and 49.16 ± 1.88, respectively. Therefore, there was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). Music therapy during the RIRS procedure under spinal anesthesia was associated with a significantly decrease in pain and anxiety scores in patients., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Rationale: Managing anesthesia in patients with severe pulmonary conditions involves complex considerations, especially when dealing with high baseline CO2 levels. We present a case that demonstrates the challenges and complexities of anesthesia and postoperative analgesia in a patient with severe pulmonary hypertension and a history of lung disease exacerbated by the interactions of protein-bound drugs., Patient Concerns: A 37-year-old woman at 38 weeks of gestation presented with recurrent chest tightness, shortness of breath, and worsening symptoms over a week, which required emergency medical attention., Diagnosis: The patient was diagnosed with severe pulmonary hypertension, and echocardiography revealed a pulmonary artery pressure of 106 mm Hg upon admission. Postoperative complications included sudden unconsciousness after low dose (2 µg) sufentanil administration, indicative of carbon dioxide narcosis that could compound pharmacological interactions and her underlying condition., Interventions: The patient underwent a cesarean section under spinal anesthesia, which was complicated postoperatively by respiratory depression, requiring naloxone administration and intensive care., Outcomes: Despite initial postoperative challenges, the patient's condition stabilized, allowing eventual discharge., Lessons: The clinical course highlighted the need for careful monitoring and prompt intervention in anesthesia in patients with severe pulmonary hypertension, particularly when administering multiple protein-bound drugs. Drug interactions can exacerbate the underlying condition, necessitating diligent oversight to prevent severe complications such as carbon dioxide narcosis., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background and Objectives: The selection of an appropriate anesthesia method is a critical factor in the surgical treatment of proctological diseases, significantly impacting patient outcomes and comfort. Pudendal nerve block (PNB) and spinal anesthesia (SA) are commonly employed in these surgeries, yet the optimal choice between the two remains debated. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of PNB and SA in patients undergoing surgical treatment for various proctological conditions, with a focus on postoperative pain management, functional outcomes, and complication rates. Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted on 590 patients who underwent proctological surgery under either PNB (n = 435) or SA (n = 155). Pain levels were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), while functional outcomes were measured using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0). Statistical analysis was performed to compare the outcomes between the two groups. Results: Patients in the PNB group reported significantly lower postoperative VAS scores compared to those in the SA group, particularly in hemorrhoidectomy and laser hemorrhoidoplasty procedures. The PNB group also demonstrated superior functional outcomes, with lower postoperative WHODAS 2.0 scores and a reduced incidence of urinary retention compared to the SA group. Furthermore, the duration of surgery and hospital stay were significantly shorter for patients in the PNB group. Conclusions: The findings suggest that PNB may offer advantages over SA in proctological surgeries, particularly in terms of pain management, functional recovery, and reduced complication rates. PNB should be considered a viable alternative to SA, particularly in cases where rapid recovery and minimizing complications are priorities. Exceptions to this include specific proctological surgeries, such as those for malignant tumors in the region, complex anal fistulas, proctological conditions arising from inflammatory bowel diseases, and patients on immunosuppressive therapy. Further research is needed to confirm these results and optimize anesthesia selection in this context.

Background/importance: Arachnoiditis is a rare but devastating disorder caused by various insults, one of which is purported to be local anesthetic neurotoxicity following neuraxial blockade. However, the relationship between local anesthetics administered into the neuraxis and the development of arachnoiditis has not been clearly elucidated., Objective: We aimed to summarize the existing complex body of literature and characterize both the essential features and strength of any association between neuraxial local anesthetic neurotoxicity and arachnoiditis with a view toward mitigating risk, enhancing prevention, and refining informed consent discussions., Evidence Review: We reviewed all published reports of arachnoiditis attributed to local anesthetic neurotoxicity following perioperative neuraxial anesthesia. This narrative review was based on a systematic search methodology, which included articles published up until December 2022., Findings: Thirty-eight articles were included, comprising 130 patients, over one-half of which were published prior to this century and inconsistent with modern practice. Neuraxial techniques included 78 epidurals, 48 spinals, and 5 combined spinal-epidurals, mostly for obstetrics. Reporting of essential procedural data was generally incomplete. Overall, at least 57% of patients experienced complicated needle/catheter insertion, including paresthesia, pain, or multiple attempts, irrespective of technique. The onset of neurological symptoms ranged from immediate to 8 years after neuraxial blockade, while the pathophysiology of arachnoiditis, if described, was heterogeneous., Conclusions: The existing literature attributing arachnoiditis to local anesthetic neurotoxicity is largely outdated, incomplete, and/or confounded by other potential causes, and thus insufficient to characterize the features and strength of any association., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© American Society of Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: The study aimed to determine the effects of caffeine consumption and sleep on post-spinal headache after spinal anesthesia., Background: Post-spinal headache is among the most well-known and common complications of spinal anesthesia. Although caffeine consumption is recommended to prevent headache after spinal anesthesia, caffeine does not prevent headache and causes sleep-related problems. No study in the literature found a correlation between sleep and caffeine consumption after spinal anesthesia and post-spinal headache., Methods: The research is a descriptive and cross-sectional study. The study sample comprised 425 patients who underwent elective surgery in a research hospital. The research data were collected by face-to-face interviews between April 2021 and December 2023. The "Sociodemographic and Clinical Characteristics Form," "Richard-Campbell Sleep Scale," "Insomnia Severity Index," and "Visual Analog Scale" were used in data collection. Factors affecting post-spinal headache were determined using binary logistic regression analysis., Results: According to the binary logistic regression, the insomnia severity score (OR = 1.234; p < .001), sleep quality score (OR = .992; p < .01), postoperative sleep duration (OR = .619; p < .05), and not consuming coffee (OR = .035; p < .001) are statistically significant predictors of post-spinal headache and explain 57.7% of the variance. A one-unit increase in patients' insomnia severity increased the probability of experiencing a post-spinal headache by 23.4%. With a one-unit increase in sleep quality, there was an 8% decrease in the probability of experiencing spinal headache, and a 3.81% decrease in the probability of experiencing post-spinal headache with an increase in sleep duration after surgery. The probability of experiencing post-spinal headache was 0.35 times higher in individuals who did not consume caffeine after surgery than in those who consumed it., Conclusion: The present study demonstrated that insomnia severity and sleep quality were more effective than caffeine consumption in preventing post-spinal headache. Insomnia and decreased sleep quality may cause a significant burden in developing post-spinal headache in patients and may cause post-spinal headache to be observed more frequently. Therefore, the use of caffeine in preventing or reducing post-spinal headache may adversely affect the duration and quality of sleep and increase the severity of insomnia., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: Intrathecal morphine provides effective analgesia for a range of operations. However, widespread implementation into clinical practice is hampered by concerns for potential side-effects. We undertook a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression with the primary objective of determining whether a threshold dose for non-pulmonary complications could be defined and whether an association could be established between dose and complication rates when intrathecal morphine is administered for perioperative or obstetric analgesia., Methods: We systematically searched the literature for randomised controlled trials comparing intrathecal morphine vs control in patients undergoing any type of surgery under general or spinal anaesthesia, or women in labour. Primary outcomes were rates of postoperative nausea and vomiting, pruritus, and urinary retention within the first 24 postoperative hours, analysed according to doses (1-100 μg; 101-200 μg; 201-500 μg; >500 μg), type of surgery, and anaesthetic strategy. Trials were excluded if doses were not specified., Results: Our analysis included 168 trials with 9917 patients. The rates of postoperative nausea and vomiting, pruritus, and urinary retention were significantly increased in the intrathecal morphine group, with an odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 1.52 (1.29-1.79), P<0.0001; 6.11 (5.25-7.10), P<0.0001; and 1.73 (1.17-2.56), P=0.005, respectively. Meta-regression could not establish an association between dose and rates of non-pulmonary complications. There was no subgroup difference according to surgery for any outcome. The quality of evidence was low (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation [GRADE] system)., Conclusions: Intrathecal morphine significantly increased postoperative nausea and vomiting, pruritus, and urinary retention after surgery or labour in a dose-independent manner., Systematic Review Protocol: PROSPERO (CRD42023387838)., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Study Objective: Spinal anesthesia often causes hypotension, with consequent risk to the fetus. The use of vasopressor agents has been highly recommended for the prevention of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension during caesarean delivery. Many studies have shown that norepinephrine can provide more stable maternal hemodynamics than phenylephrine. We therefore tested the hypothesis that norepinephrine preserves fetal circulation better than phenylephrine when used to treat maternal hypotension consequent to spinal anesthesia., Design: Prospective, randomized, double-blinded study., Setting: Operating room., Patients: We recruited 223 parturients with uncomplicated singleton pregnancies who were scheduled for elective caesarean section under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia., Interventions: The patients received prophylactic intravenous infusion of either 0.08 μg/kg/min norepinephrine or 0.5 μg/kg/min phenylephrine for prevention of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension., Measurements: Changes in fetal heart rate and fetal cardiac output before and after spinal anesthesia were measured using noninvasive Doppler ultrasound., Main Results: 90 subjects who received norepinephrine infusion and 93 subjects who received phenylephrine infusion were ultimately analyzed in the present study. The effects of norepinephrine and phenylephrine on the change of fetal heart rate and fetal cardiac output at 3 and 6 min after spinal block were similar. Although there was a statistically significant decrease in fetal cardiac output at 6 min after subarachnoid block initiation in both the norepinephrine group (mean difference 0.02 L/min; 95% CI, 0-0.04 L/min; P = 0.03) and the phenylephrine group (mean difference 0.02 L/min; 95% CI, 0-0.04 L/min; P = 0.02), it remained within the normal range., Conclusions: Prophylactic infusion of comparable doses of phenylephrine or norepinephrine has similar effects on fetal heart rate and cardiac output changes after spinal anesthesia. Neither phenylephrine nor norepinephrine has meaningful detrimental effects on fetal circulation or neonatal outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Previous studies have shown that a 0.05 μg/kg/min of norepinephrine infusion in combination with an initial bolus reduces the incidence of spinal hypotension during cesarean delivery. The initial norepinephrine bolus influences the incidence of spinal hypotension during continuous norepinephrine infusion; however, the ideal initial bolus dose for 0.05 μg/kg/min of continuous infusion remains unknown., Methods: This randomized, controlled, dose-finding study randomly allocated 120 parturients scheduled for elective cesarean delivery to receive initial bolus doses of 0, 0.05, 0.10, and 0.15 μg/kg of norepinephrine, followed by continuous infusion at a rate of 0.05 μg/kg/min. The primary outcome was the dose-response relationship of the initial norepinephrine bolus in preventing the incidence of spinal hypotension. Spinal hypotension was defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) decreased to <80% of the baseline value or to an absolute value of <90 mmHg from intrathecal injection to delivery, and severe spinal hypotension was defined as SBP decreased to <60% of the baseline value. The secondary outcomes included the incidence of nausea and/or vomiting, hypertension, and bradycardia, as well as the Apgar scores and results of the umbilical arterial blood gas analysis. The effective dose (ED) 90 and ED95 were estimated using probit regression., Results: The per-protocol analysis included 117 patients. The incidence of spinal hypotension varied significantly among the groups: Group 0 (51.7%), Group 0.05 (44.8%), Group 0.10 (23.3%), and Group 0.15 (6.9%). The ED90 and ED95 values were 0.150 μg/kg (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.114-0.241 μg/kg) and 0.187 μg/kg (95% CI, 0.141-0.313 μg/kg), respectively. However, the ED95 value fell outside the dose range examined in this study. The incidence of severe spinal hypotension differed significantly (P = 0.02) among Groups 0 (17.2%), 0.05 (10.3%), 0.10 (3.3%), and 0.15 (0.0%); however, the incidence of hypertension and bradycardia did not. The incidence of nausea and/or vomiting decreased with an increase in the initial bolus dose (P = 0.03). The fetal outcomes were comparable among the groups., Conclusions: An initial bolus of 0.150 μg/kg of norepinephrine may be the optimal dose for preventing spinal hypotension during cesarean delivery with a continuous infusion rate of 0.05 μg/kg/min, and does not significantly increase the incidence of hypertension but substantially reduces the risk of nausea and/or vomiting., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Postoperative urinary retention is a common consequence of pelvic surgeries. It is often related both to the nature of surgery and the medication used in the perioperative period. Adhesive arachnoiditis (AA) is a rare condition, which has various clinical presentations ranging from back pain to disabling neurological deficits. Numerous aetiologies for AA have been described in the literature, one such noted is spinal anaesthesia. We report a patient who presented with isolated bladder dysfunction in the form of urinary retention after spinal anaesthesia. She was evaluated and diagnosed with AA as the cause of her urinary retention. AA was complicated by raised intracranial pressure. She was treated with corticosteroids and acetazolamide, following which she made a full recovery. We would like to highlight this rare presentation, as well as lay emphasis on the early evaluation of seemingly anticipated symptoms such as postoperative urinary retention., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is the most common complication following spinal anesthesia among parturients undergoing cesarean section surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of acetaminophen and caffeine in preventing PDPH., Methods: This double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted on 96 obstetric women, who were candidates for elective cesarean section. Following the randomization of participants into two groups, participants in the intervention group received tablets of acetaminophen (500 mg)+caffeine (65 mg), and participants in the control group received placebo tablets orally 2 hours before spinal anesthesia induction and then every 6 hours after surgery up to 24 hours. All parturients were evaluated for frequency and intensity of PDPH every 6 hours until 24 hours after surgery and then 48 and 72 hours after surgery. Overall satisfaction during the first 72 hours of postpartum was evaluated. The data were analyzed using SPSS software. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant., Results: Participants in the intervention group were 70% less likely to experience PDPH after spinal anesthesia (OR=0.31 P=0.01, 95% CI [0.12-0.77]). They also experienced significantly milder headaches 18 hours, 48 hours, and 72 hours later. Participants in the intervention group reported higher levels of satisfaction at the end of the study (P=0.01). No side effects related to the intervention were reported., Conclusion: Prophylactic administration of acetaminophen+caffeine decreases 70% the risk of PDPH and significantly attenuates pain intensity in obstetric patients who underwent spinal anesthesia for cesarean section., Competing Interests: Mohammad Ali Sahmeddini and Naeimehossadat Asmarian, as the Editorial Board Members, were not involved in any stage of handling this manuscript. A team of independent experts was formed by the Editorial Board to review the article without their knowledge., (Copyright: © Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences.)

Objective: This study aimed to observe the safe use of intraspinal anesthesia in geriatric orthopedic surgery and its effect on coagulation factors., Methods: The anesthesia indices, cognitive functions, hemodynamic indicators, along with coagulation function indices were compared. The duration of anesthesia was compared between the two groups. Adverse reactions occurring in the two groups of patients were compared., Results: The time to awaken, time to open eyes, time to the verbal statement, the onset of anesthesia, duration of sensory blockade, and duration of motor nerve blockade were shorter while the duration of analgesia was longer in the observation group than in the control group. The observation group's postoperative Mini-Mental State Examination scores were higher than those of the control group. Heart rate and mean arterial pressure of the patients in the observation group at 10 min after anesthesia and at the end of surgery were lower versus those in the control group. The observation group had lower levels of von Willebrand factor (%) and fibrinogen at 10 min after anesthesia and at the end of surgery than the control group, and lower levels of the thrombin-antithrombin complex at the end of surgery than the control group. The observation group exhibited a lower incidence of adverse reactions in contrast to the control group., Conclusion: The application of intraspinal anesthesia in geriatric orthopedic surgery has a significant and remarkable effect, with less impact on patients' hemodynamics and postoperative cognitive function, and can improve patients' blood hypercoagulability.

Background: Anaesthetists of all grades who work on a labour ward are likely to be involved in the insertion or management of an intrathecal catheter after inadvertent dural puncture at some point in their careers. Although the use of intrathecal catheters after inadvertent dural puncture in labour has increased in popularity over recent decades, robust evidence on best practice has been lacking., Methods: The Obstetric Anaesthetists' Association set up an expert working party to review the literature. A modified Delphi approach was used to produce statements and recommendations on insertion and management of intrathecal catheters for labour and operative delivery following inadvertent dural puncture during attempted labour epidural insertion. Statements and recommendations were graded according to the US Preventive Services Task Force grading methodology., Results: A total of 296 articles were identified in the initial literature search. Further screening identified 111 full text papers of relevance. A structured narrative review was produced which covered insertion of an intrathecal catheter; initial dosing; maintenance of labour analgesia; topping-up for operative delivery; safety features; complications; and recommended follow-up. The working party agreed on 17 statements and 26 recommendations. These were generally assigned a low or moderate level of certainty. The safety of mother and baby were a key priority in producing these guidelines., Conclusions: With careful management, intrathecal catheters can provide excellent labour analgesia and may also be topped-up to provide anaesthesia for caesarean or operative vaginal delivery. The use of intrathecal catheters, however, also carries the risk of significant drug errors which may result in high- or total-spinal anaesthesia, or even cardiorespiratory arrest. It is vital that all labour wards have clear guidelines on the use of these catheters, and that staff are educated as to their potential complications., (© 2024 The Author(s). Anaesthesia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Anaesthetists.)

Background: Spinal anaesthesia is a common anaesthetic method for caesarean sections but often results in hypotension, posing potential risks to maternal and neonatal health. Norepinephrine, as a vasopressor, may be effective in preventing and treating this hypotension. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of prophylactic norepinephrine infusion for the treatment of hypotension following spinal anaesthesia in caesarean sections., Methods: Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases for relevant studies on prophylactic administration of norepinephrine for the treatment of hypotension after spinal anaesthesia in caesarean delivery. Reference lists of included articles were also searched. The latest search update was on March 20, 2024. Meta-analysis was conducted using R software. The methods recommended by the Cochrane Handbook, Begge's and Egger's tests were used for risk of bias evaluation of the included literature., Results: Nine studies were finally included in this study. The results showed that prophylactic administration of norepinephrine was superior to the control group in four aspects of treating hypotension after spinal anaesthesia in caesarean delivery: the incidence of hypotension was reduced [RR = 0.34, 95%CI (0.27-0.43), P  < 0.01]; the incidence of severe hypotension was reduced [RR = 0.32, 95%CI (0.21-0.51), P  < 0.01]; and maternal blood pressure was more stable with MDPE [MD = -5.00, 95%CI (-7.80--2.21), P =  0.06] and MDAPE [MD = 4.11, 95%CI (1.38-6.85), P  < 0.05], the incidence of nausea and vomiting was reduced [RR = 0.52, 95%CI (0.35-0.77), P  < 0.01]. On the other hand, the incidence of reactive hypertension was higher than the control group [RR = 3.58, 95%CI (1.94-6.58), P  < 0.01]. There was no difference between the two groups in one aspects: newborn Apgar scores [MD = -0.01, 95%CI (-0.10-0.09, P  = 0.85)]., Conclusion: Prophylactic administration of norepinephrine is effective in treating hypotension after spinal anaesthesia in caesarean delivery patients; however, it does not provide improved safety and carries a risk of inducing reactive hypertension.

Purpose of Review: To assess current practice in the use of spinal anesthesia in major ambulatory surgery, highlighting its advantages over general anesthesia and identifying potential areas for improvement to facilitate a transition to a sustainable healthcare system., Recent Findings: Spinal anesthesia might be preferred in selected populations when compared to general anesthesia providing the highest standards of healthcare quality.The use of local anesthetics with short half-life has proven to be efficient in achieving high anesthesia success rates. Spinal anesthesia does not increase perioperative complications; instead, it has shown a reduction in postoperative nausea and vomiting, an improvement in patient comfort, and a favorable economic impact when compared to general anesthesia., Summary: Spinal anesthesia is an appropriate method for anesthesia in ambulatory patients, offering advantages over general anesthesia in selected populations.The use of spinal anesthesia is expanding to meet surgical needs. Therefore, it is crucial to plan ahead and anticipate organizational failures in the ambulatory setting to maintain safety and efficiency during outpatient procedures and surgeries., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Objectives: This study aimed to explore the effects of cerebral oxygenation, body temperature, hemodynamic changes, and anesthesia type on postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) in geriatric patients undergoing hip fracture surgery., Patients and Methods: One hundred five elderly patients (59 males, 46 females; mean age: 76.7±8.8 years; range, 65 to 95 years) who were scheduled for hip fracture surgery under general or spinal anesthesia between March 2021 and March 2023 were enrolled in the prospective observational study. The cognitive functions were evaluated using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Postoperative MMSE values <24 were considered indicative of POCD. Cerebral oxygenation was evaluated before and during the operation using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), and body temperature was measured using a tympanic thermometer, with values <36℃ considered hypothermia. The relationship between decreases in blood pressure ≥30% and POCD was investigated. The relationship between decreases in NIRS of 25% and POCD was also investigated., Results: Postoperative cognitive dysfunction was observed in 29 (27.25%) of the 105 patients. The MMSE value was 24 in 67.06% of 29 patients, and all these patients developed POCD. The incidence of POCD in patients with a preoperative MMSE1 score of 30 was 12.30% (p=0.001). No relationship was identified between MMSE changes and anesthesia type, hypotension, and decreases in the NIRS (p=0.439, p=0.399). Hypothermia was found to be significantly related to POCD (p=0.013). The degree of hypothermia decreased the postoperative MMSE value at different rates. A 1°C body temperature decrease caused a 16.7%, 44.4%, and 50% decrease in MMSE scores of one, one, and two patients, respectively., Conclusion: Hypothermia was found to be significantly related to POCD. The same degree of hypothermia caused different MMSE changes. Since the number of patients with POCD was very low, the effect of amounts of body temperature changes on clinically significant MMSE changes could not be supported by logistic regression. The preoperative MMSE values, MMSE change rates, and age were found to be effective in POCD. Maintaining the body temperature throughout the operation will ensure the preservation of postoperative cognitive functions.

Background: Cesarean deliveries (CD) are commonly performed using neuraxial anesthesia. The use of neuraxial morphine has proven beneficial in terms of postoperative pain management; however, its effect on postoperative urine retention remains unclear., Objectives: To determine whether morphine injection into the neuraxis during CD influences postoperative urinary retention rate., Methods: We conducted a retrospective case-control observational study of patients undergoing CD. We compared patients using morphine injected into the intrathecal or epidural spaces (November 2020 to October 2021) to a historical cohort of patients undergoing CD without morphine (November 2019 to October 2020). The primary outcome was the rate of postoperative overt urinary retention necessitating bladder catheterization., Results: The study group comprised 283 patients, and 313 patients in the control group were eligible for analysis. No differences were found with respect to the baseline demographic and indication for CD. The number of postpartum urinary bladder catheterizations due to urine retention was higher in the study group (5% vs. 1%, P-value = 0.003). No cases of 30-day readmission were recorded. Moreover, patients treated with neuraxial morphine required fewer repeat doses of postoperative anesthesia (oral analgesia 7.4 vs. 10.1, intravenous analgesia 0.29 vs. 0.31, oral opioids 0.06 vs. 3.70, intravenous opioids 0.01 vs. 0.45, P-value < 0.001 for all)., Conclusions: While neuraxial morphine used during CD appears to be safe and effective, the risk of postoperative urinary retention seems to be increased due to its use. Cases of overt urinary retention treated by bladder catheterization does not lead to short-term complications.

Objective: To investigate whether transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) at PC6 could reduce hypotension after spinal anesthesia (SA) in parturients and to compare the effect of TEAS at different frequencies. Methods: From February 20, 2023, to August 29, 2023, 90 parturients scheduled for c-section under SA were randomly assigned to receive no treatment (Control), TEAS at high frequency (TEAS-HF), or TEAS at low frequency (TEAS-LF). Treatments started immediately after SA and lasted for 30 min. The primary endpoint was incidence of hypotension by 30 min after SA. Secondary endpoints included lowest systolic blood pressure (SBP) during 30 min after SA, dose of ephedrine, dose of atropine, Apgar score at 1 min, and adverse events, including nausea, vomiting, dizziness, dyspnea, and chest congestion. Results: In the TEAS-HF group, the incidence of hypotension by 30 min after SA was lower (13.3%) than in the Control (53.3%, p  = 0.001; OR 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2-2.8) and TEAS-LF group (40.0%, p  = 0.02, OR 1.4, 95% CI: 1.0-2.0). The lowest SBP during 30 min after SA was higher in the TEAS-HF group (100.0 ± 9.4 mm Hg) than in the Control group (91.5 ± 16.5 mm Hg) and TEAS-LF group (93.9 ± 16.6 mm Hg). Patients who received TEAS showed a lower score of nausea and vomiting (both p  = 0.02). Patients in the group TEAS-HF showed a lower incidence of dizziness, dyspnea, and of chest congestion than those in the other two groups. There was no difference with respect to atropine consumption and neonatal Apgar score. Conclusions: TEAS-HF at PC6 reduced hypotension after SA in parturients, while TEAS-LF did not. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05724095).

Objectives: Cranial nerve paralysis is a rare complication of spinal and epidural anesthesia, and some cases of vocal fold paralysis (VFP) have been reported. The aim of this article is to report a case, identify evidence supporting the possibility of VFP being a complication of spinal and epidural anesthesia and to investigate the frequency, the characteristics, and the possible mechanisms of such a complication., Data Sources: CINAHL Complete, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, Pubmed, and EMBASE., Methods: Case report according to CARE guidelines; scoping review according to PRISMA-ScR criteria. All types of studies that reported on patients of any age and sex, all types of spinal/epidural anesthesia regardless of the location and of drugs used were included. A data extraction sheet was completed for each study selected for inclusion based on the full-text screenings. Extracted data included: study characteristics, participant characteristics, intervention characteristics, outcome measures, clinical investigations. The study did not receive external funding., Results: Eight studies met inclusion criteria and a total of 13 events (in 12 patients, including ours) were reported to date. Although there are some hypotheses in regard to the mechanism underlying the phenomena, including mechanical and inflammatory ones, the exact cause is still unclear., Conclusions: Only few cases of VFP after spinal or epidural anesthesia have been reported to date; however, it seems possible that VFP might be a potential underreported complication of such procedures. We believe that more research on the topic is warranted, especially considering the wide population potentially at risk., Level of Evidence: NA Laryngoscope, 134:3477-3484, 2024., (© 2024 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.)

Study Objective: Following robot assisted abdominal surgery, the pain can be moderate in severity. Neuraxial analgesia may decrease the activity of the detrusor muscle, reduce the incidence of bladder spasm and provide effective somatic and visceral analgesia. In this systematic review, we assessed the role of neuraxial analgesia in robot assisted abdominal surgery., Design: Systematic review., Settings: Robot assisted abdominal surgery., Patients: Adults., Interventions: Subsequent to a search of the electronic databases, observational studies and randomized controlled trials that assessed the effect of neuraxial analgesia instituted at induction of anesthesia or intraoperatively in adult and robot assisted abdominal surgery were considered for inclusion. The outcomes of observational studies as well as randomized controlled trials which were not subjected to meta-analysis were presented in descriptive terms. Meta-analysis was conducted if an outcome of interest was reported by two or more randomized controlled trials., Main Results: We included 19 and 11 studies that investigated spinal and epidural analgesia in adults, respectively. The coprimary outcomes were the pain score at rest at 24 h and the cumulative intravenous morphine consumption at 24 h. Spinal analgesia with long acting neuraxial opioid did not decrease the pain score at rest at 24 h although it reduced the cumulative intravenous morphine consumption at 24 h by a mean difference (95%CI) of 14.88 mg (-22.13--7.63; p < 0.0001, I 2  = 50%) with a low and moderate quality of evidence, respectively, on meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Spinal analgesia with long acting neuraxial opioid had a beneficial effect on analgesic indices till the second postoperative day and a positive influence on opioid consumption up to and including the 72 h time point. The majority of studies demonstrated the use of spinal analgesia with long acting neuraxial opioid to lead to no difference in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and the occurrence of pruritus was found to be increased with spinal analgesia with long acting neuraxial opioid in recovery but not at later time points. No difference was revealed in the incidence of urinary retention. The evidence in regard to the quality of recovery-15 score at 24 h and hospital length of stay was not fully consistent, although most studies indicated no difference between spinal analgesia and control for these outcomes. Epidural analgesia in robot assisted abdominal surgery was shown to decrease the pain on movement at 12 h but it had not been studied with respect to its influence on the pain score at rest at 24 h or the cumulative intravenous morphine consumption at 24 h. It did not reduce the pain on movement at later time points and the evidence related to the hospital length of stay was inconsistent., Conclusions: Spinal analgesia with long acting neuraxial opioid had a favourable effect on analgesic indices and opioid consumption, and is recommended by the authors, but the evidence for spinal analgesia with short acting neuraxial opioid and epidural analgesia was limited., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they do not have any conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Total spinal anaesthesia (TSA) is an emergency caused by high neuraxial blockade. It is a recognised complication of all neuraxial techniques in obstetric anaesthesia. Its incidence and outcomes have not been evaluated. There is compelling evidence that TSA continues to be a problem in contemporary practice, having the capacity to cause significant morbidity and mortality if not recognised early and promptly treated. This review based on a literature search aims to clarify the epidemiology of TSA, summarise its pathophysiology, and identify risk factors and effective treatments., Methods: We performed a literature search using PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases using specified search terms for materials published using search terms. For each case, the type of block, the difficulty of the procedure, the dose of local anaesthetic, positivity of aspiration before and after the event, maternal outcome, Apgar score, onset of symptoms, cardiorespiratory and neurological manifestations, cardiorespiratory support employed, admission to an intensive care unit, cardiac arrest events and duration of mechanical ventilation were extracted., Results: A total of 605 cases were identified, of which 51 were sufficiently detailed for analysis. Although TSA is described after all neuraxial techniques, spinal after epidural was a particular concern in recent reports. Respiratory distress was universal but apnoea was not. The onset of apnoea was variable, ranging from 1 to 180 min. Hypotension was not invariable and occurred in approximately half of cases. Multiple fatalities and neurological injuries were reported, often in under-resourced areas when providers were not skilled in airway management or when recognition and intervention were delayed. In the most recent reports good outcomes were achieved when effective treatments were rapidly provided., Conclusions: The available literature confirms that TSA remains an active clinical problem and that with prompt recognition and treatment good outcomes can be achieved. This requires anticipation and preparedness in all clinical areas where neuraxial techniques are performed., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This study aimed to investigate whether the administration of intrathecal dexmedetomidine as a bupivacaine adjuvant for caesarean section can prolong the duration of analgesia compared with bupivacaine alone. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain, the time interval to the first analgesic request, the level of sedation, the incidence of adverse effects, and the fetal outcomes., Materials and Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. The study compared the intrathecal administration of bupivacaine plus dexmedetomidine (group BD) to the intrathecal administration of bupivacaine alone (group B) for cesarean sections., Results: Fourteen publications were included. Among patients who underwent spinal anesthesia for a cesarean section, 514 patients received intrathecal bupivacaine alone, and 533 patients received intrathecal bupivacaine plus dexmedetomidine. The onset of sensory and motor block was essentially the same in both groups; the time for sensory and motor block regression was significantly longer in the BD group. Postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) values were similar in group BD when compared to group B. Postoperative VAS scores remained consistently low in Group BD compared to Group B, starting from 1 hour after surgery. The level of sedation measured at the end of the cesarean section in both groups was almost similar. No difference in terms of safety, adverse events, and neonatal outcomes was found between the two groups., Conclusions: Use of intrathecal dexmedetomidine for spinal anesthesia in cesarean section significantly prolongs sensory and motor block compared to using bupivacaine alone as an adjuvant. It also improves analgesia after 1 hour with no difference in the incidence of maternal and neonatal adverse effects compared to bupivacaine alone. The optimal dose of dexmedetomidine to use remains to be ingested.

Background: Nalbuphine, a synthetic k-agonist and µ-antagonist, provides efficient pain relief while reducing opioid-related adverse effects. This study aims to compare the efficacy of intrathecal nalbuphine (ITN) with intrathecal morphine (ITM) for post-TKA pain., Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis of 131 patients who underwent TKA with spinal anesthesia (SA), a single shot of adductor canal block, and periarticular injections was conducted. The patients were divided into 2 groups, Group N received 0.8 mg nalbuphine, and Group M received 0.2 mg morphine as an adjuvant to SA. Propensity-score matching was employed to compare the visual analog scales (VAS) of postoperative pain intensity, cumulative morphine use (CMU), maximum knee flexion angle, straight leg raise (SLR) ability, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and length of hospital stay (LHS)., Results: The mean VAS of group M were significantly lower than group N at 6, 12, 18, and 24 h (P < 0.01). Group M had lower CMU than group N at 24 h (P < 0.01) and 48 h (P < 0.01), while there was no significant difference between groups in terms of knee flexion angle and SLR at any time point. Additionally, 29.3 and 57.9% of patients in group N and M experienced PONV, respectively (p = 0.04), and group N had significantly shorter LHS compared to group M (P < 0.001)., Conclusion: Although, intrathecal morphine (ITM) still provides better pain control particularly in the first 24 h, patients who received intrathecal nalbuphine (ITN) had significantly fewer incidence of PONV, and shorter LHS., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: The hemodynamic effects of relatively low-dose epinephrine and phenylephrine infusions during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were compared., Methods: This randomized controlled trial included full-term pregnant women who underwent elective cesarean delivery. After spinal anesthesia, participants received either epinephrine (0.03 mcg/kg/min) or phenylephrine (0.4 mcg/kg/min) infusion that continued until 5 min after delivery. The primary outcome was a composite outcome of the occurrence of any of hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, and/or tachycardia. Neonatal outcomes, including umbilical artery blood gas and Apgar scores, were assessed., Results: In total, 98 patients in each group were analyzed, and the number of patients with the composite outcome was comparable between the epinephrine and phenylephrine groups (30/98 [31%] vs. 31/98 [32%], respectively; P = 0.877). However, the incidence of hypotension was likely lower in the epinephrine group than in the phenylephrine group (P = 0.066), and the number of hypotensive episodes per patient was lower in the epinephrine group than in the phenylephrine group. On the other hand, the incidence of tachycardia was higher in the epinephrine group than that in the phenylephrine group. The incidence of hypertension was comparable between the two groups and none of the participants developed bradycardia. Neonatal outcomes were comparable between the two groups., Conclusions: Epinephrine and phenylephrine infusion produced comparable maternal hemodynamics and neonatal outcomes. Epinephrine was associated with a higher incidence of maternal tachycardia and likely lower incidence of maternal hypotension than phenylephrine. IRB number: MD-245-2022., Clinical Trial Registration: This study was registered on May 31, 2023 at clinicaltrials.gov registry, NCT05881915, URL: https://classic., Clinicaltrials: gov/ct2/show/NCT05881915term=NCT05881915&draw=2&rank=1., (© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists.)

To investigate the effect of low-doses esketamine on spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in women with preoperative anxiety undergoing elective cesarean section, the randomized controlled trial enrolled 120 women aged 18-35 years who preoperative State-Trait Anxiety Inventory State scores > 40, conducted from September 2022 to August 2023 in Xuzhou Central Hospital, China. Women in the esketamine group received a single intravenous injection of 0.2 mg/kg esketamine after sensory block level achieved. The incidence of hypotension in the esketamine group was significantly lower than the control group at T2 (10% [6 of 60]; P < 0.001), T3 (5.0% [3 of 60]; P = 0.007) and T4(5.0% [3 of 60]; P = 0.004). Despite being higher in the esketamine group, the overall rates of hypertension (11.7% [7 of 60]; P = 0.186), tachycardia (23.3% [14 of 60]; P = 0.246), and bradycardia (0.0% [0 of 60]; P = 0.079) were no significantly difference between the two groups. STAI-S scores was significantly lower in the esketamine group (mean [SD] 37.52[7.14]) than in the control group (mean [SD] 41.03[9.66], P = 0.39) in postoperative day 1. Spinal anesthesia combined with intravenous low-doses esketamine infusion can significantly reduce the incidence of hypotension in women with preoperative anxiety undergoing elective cesarean section., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Delayed spinal epidural hematoma (SEH) following central neuraxial block (CNB) is a rare but serious complication. The underlying causes of SEH associated with neuraxial anesthesia are still unclear. Furthermore, the decision between surgical intervention and conservative management for SEH remains a complex and unresolved issue., Case Presentation: We report a case of delayed SEH in a 73-year-old woman who underwent vaginal hysterectomy under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia, with the administration of postoperative anticoagulants to prevent deep vein thrombosis on the 1st postoperative day (POD). She experienced symptoms 56 h after CNB. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a dorsal SEH at the L1-L4 level with compression of the thecal sac. On conservative treatment, full recovery was achieved after six months., Conclusions: This case reminds anesthesiologists should be alert to the possible occurrence of a delayed SEH following CNB, particularly with the administration of anticoagulants. Immediate neurological evaluation of neurological deficit and MRI are advised. Conservative treatment combined with close and dynamic neurological function monitoring may be feasible for patients with mild or nonprogressive symptoms even spontaneous recovery., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Peripheral vasodilation causes a redistribution of body temperature from the core to the periphery, resulting in shivering and hypothermia. These are normal pathological and physiological processes during spinal anaesthesia. Two drugs, norepinephrine and phenylephrine, have peripheral vasoconstrictive effects. It is unclear the effects of norepinephrine and phenylephrine on shivering and hypothermia in patients undergoing caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia., Methods Analysis: 240 eligible parturients will be recruited for this randomised, double-blind, controlled trial and randomly assigned to either the norepinephrine or phenylephrine groups. The primary outcome will be the incidence of shivering while secondary outcomes will include the severity of shivering, rectal temperature, incidence of hypothermia and umbilical artery blood pH value., Ethics and Dissemination: The Institutional Ethics Committee of The Second People's Hospital of Hefei approved the trial protocol (ID: 2023-093). The results will be published in a compliant journal. The original data will be released in December 2029 on the ResMan original data-sharing platform of the China Clinical Trial Registry (http://www.medresman.org.cn)., Trial Registration Number: ChiCTR2300077164., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Vasopressors remain an important strategy for managing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in women with preeclampsia. The aim of this study was to investigate the ED90s and efficacy ratio of phenylephrine and norepinephrine in managing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in women with preeclampsia during cesarean delivery., Methods: 60 women with preeclampsia, who underwent cesarean delivery, were randomly assigned to receive either a continuous intravenous infusion of phenylephrine or norepinephrine following spinal anesthesia. The initial dosage of phenylephrine or norepinephrine for the first women was 0.5 or 0.05 μg/kg/min, respectively, and subsequent infusion dosages were adjusted based on their efficacy in preventing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension (defined as a systolic blood pressure less than 80% of the baseline level). The incremental or decremental doses of phenylephrine or norepinephrine were set at 0.1 or 0.01 μg/kg/min. The primary outcomes were the ED90s and efficacy ratio of phenylephrine and norepinephrine infusions for preventing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension prior to delivery., Results: The results obtained from isotonic regression analysis revealed that the ED90 values of the phenylephrine and norepinephrine group for preventing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension were 0.597 (95% CI: 0.582-0.628) and 0.054 (95% CI: 0.053-0.056) μg/kg/min, respectively, with an efficacy ratio of 11.1:1. The results of Probit regression analysis revealed that the ED90 values were determined to be 0.665 (95% CI: 0.576-1.226) and 0.055 (95% CI: 0.047-0.109) μg/kg/min, respectively, with an efficacy ratio of 12.1:1., Conclusion: The administration of 0.6 μg/kg/min phenylephrine and 0.05 μg/kg/min norepinephrine has been found to effectively manage a 90% incidence of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in women with preeclampsia., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest in this work., (© 2024 Tan et al.)

Background: Norepinephrine and phenylephrine are commonly used vasoactive drugs to treat hypotension during the perioperative period. The increased release of endogenous norepinephrine elicits prothrombotic changes, while parturients are generally in a hypercoagulable state. Therefore, this trial aims to investigate whether there is a disparity between equivalent doses of prophylactic norepinephrine infusion and phenylephrine infusion on prothrombotic response in patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia., Methods: Sixty-six eligible parturients will be recruited for this trial and randomly assigned to the norepinephrine or phenylephrine group. The "study drug" will be administered at a rate of 15 ml/h starting from the intrathecal injection. The primary outcome are plasma coagulation factor VIII activity (FVIII: C), fibrinogen, and D-dimer levels. The secondary outcomes include hemodynamic variables and umbilical artery blood pH value., Discussion: Our study is the first trial comparing the effect of norepinephrine and phenylephrine on prothrombotic response in patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Positive or negative results will all help us better understand the impact of vasoactive drugs on patients. If there are any differences, this trial will provide new evidence for maternal choice of vasoactive medications in the perioperative period., Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2300077164. Registered on 1 November 2023. https://www.chictr.org.cn/ ., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Hip fracture surgeries in elderly patients often require spinal or general anesthesia, posing risks of severe hypotension and inadequate pain management. The optimal anesthesia type for minimizing these risks remains undetermined. Preliminary studies suggest that a combination of fascia iliaca block (FIB) and low-dose low-specific-gravity spinal anesthesia (LLSA) might offer a solution, but comprehensive evidence is lacking., Objectives: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of combining FIB with LLSA for reducing severe hypotension and enhancing analgesia during hip fracture surgery in elderly patients., Study Design: A prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted., Setting: An operating theatre of a tertiary hospital., Methods: The study comprised 68 patients. They were separated into 2 equal parallel groups 34 patients each: the FIB+LLSA group and the general anesthesia (GA) group. Patients aged 75-96 undergoing primary hip arthroplasty for hip fracture were randomized to receive either FIB+LLSA or GA. The primary outcome was the incidence of severe hypotension; secondary outcomes included postoperative pain, use of rescue analgesia, vasopressor dosage, and complications., Results: We found a significantly lower incidence of severe hypotension in the FIB+LLSA group compared to the GA group (32.4% vs 67.6%). Additionally, postoperative pain scores were significantly lower, and the need for rescue analgesia was reduced in the FIB+LLSA group. Vasopressor use during surgery was also significantly lower in the FIB+LLSA group. The hospital stay was shorter in the FIB+LLSA group, with an average of 5.9 days compared to 6.7 days in the GA group., Limitations: The study's limitations include its single-center nature, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, the inability to conduct a double-blind study could introduce biases, though measures were taken to minimize this. The sample size might not be sufficient to determine the broader implications of LLSA., Conclusions: Combining FIB with LLSA for elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery significantly reduces the incidence of severe intraoperative hypotension and postoperative pain. It also decreases the need for rescue analgesia and shortens hospital stays, suggesting that FIB+LLSA could be a beneficial regional anesthesia technique for elderly hip fracture surgery patients, aligning with enhanced recovery protocols.

Intraspinal air is a rare complication of intraspinal anesthesia. Reported cases of intraspinal or intracranial air are mostly associated with the air insufflation resistance test, while those associated with the normal saline resistance test are rare. This article presents a case of intracranial air following intraspinal anesthesia performed using the normal saline resistance method. The patient was a 38-year-old female who underwent elective intraspinal anesthesia for 1 week without obvious cause of perianal swelling and pain. The procedure included incision and drainage of perianal abscess, excision of anal fistula with internal thread insertion, mixed hemorrhoid exfoliation and internal ligation, and electrocautery of anal papilloma. On the second postoperative day, she experienced headaches, dizziness, severe neck and back pain, along with numbness in the arms and inability to touch or move them. Resting in a supine position did not alleviate the symptoms. Head CT revealed scattered multiple air collections in the cranial cavity, with a total volume of approximately 3 mL. After a multidisciplinary consultation, symptomatic supportive treatment including bed rest, fluid supplementation, oxygen therapy, and anti-inflammatory and analgesic treatment was administered, leading to improvement and discharge. Follow-up at 6 months showed no discomfort. Currently, intracranial air is mostly associated with the air insufflation resistance test, while cases following the normal saline resistance method are rare, with unclear pathophysiological mechanisms, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention, necessitating further research.

Background: Fluid loading improves hemodynamic stability and reduces the incidence rate of post-spinal anesthesia hypotension when prophylactic vasopressors are administered. We investigated the impact of different crystalloid coload volumes on the 90% effective dose (ED) of prophylactic norepinephrine infusion for preventing post-spinal anesthesia hypotension in non-hypertensive patients undergoing cesarean section., Methods: Patients were randomly allocated to receive one of the different crystalloid coload volumes (0mL/kg [0mL/kg Group], 5mL kg [5mL/kg Group], and 10mL kg [10mL/kg Group]) in combination with prophylactic norepinephrine infusion immediately after the induction of spinal anesthesia. The prophylactic norepinephrine infusion doses were determined using the up-and-down sequential allocation methodology, with an initial dose of 0.025 μg/kg/min and a gradient of 0.005 μg/kg/min. The primary endpoint was the effective dose at which 90% (ED 90) of patients responded to prophylactic norepinephrine infusion for preventing post-spinal anesthesia hypotension., Results: The estimated effective dose of norepinephrine infusion, at which 90% (ED 90) of patients responded, was found to be 0.084 (95% CI, 0.070 to 0.86), 0.074 (95% CI, 0.059 to 0.077), and 0.063 (95% CI, 0.053 to 0.064) μg/kg/min in the three groups, respectively., Conclusion: A crystalloid coload of 5 mL/kg or 10 mL/kg, as opposed to the groups receiving 0 mL/kg crystalloid coloads, resulted in a reduction of approximately 11.9% and 25.0%, respectively, in the ED90 of prophylactic norepinephrine infusion for preventing post-spinal anesthesia hypotension during cesarean section., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work., (© 2024 Chen et al.)

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of intravenous palonosetron compared to ondansetron on hypotension induced by spinal anesthesia in women undergoing cesarean section., Methods: Fifty-four women scheduled for elective cesarean section were, randomly allocated to ondansetron group (n = 27) or palonosetron group (n = 27). Ten minutes prior to the administration of spinal anesthesia, participants received an intravenous injection of either ondansetron or palonosetron. A prophylactic phenylephrine infusion was initiated immediately following the intrathecal administration of bupivacaine and fentanyl. The infusion rate was titrated to maintain adequate blood pressure until the time of fetal delivery. The primary outcome was total dose of phenylephrine administered. The secondary outcomes were nausea or vomiting, the need for rescue antiemetics, hypotension, bradycardia, and shivering. Complete response rate, defined as the absence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and no need for additional antiemetics, were assessed for up to 24 hours post-surgery., Results: No significant differences were observed in the total dose of phenylephrine used between the ondansetron and palonosetron groups (387.5 μg [interquartile range, 291.3-507.8 μg versus 428.0 μg [interquartile range, 305.0-507.0 μg], P = 0.42). Complete response rates also showed no significant differences between the groups both within two hours post-spinal anesthesia (88.9% in the ondansetron group versus 100% in the palonosetron group; P = 0.24) and at 24 hours post-surgery (81.5% in the ondansetron group versus 88.8% in the palonosetron group; P = 0.7). In addition, there was no difference in other secondary outcomes., Conclusion: Prophylactic administration of palonosetron did not demonstrate a superior effect over ondansetron in mitigating hemodynamic changes or reducing phenylephrine requirements in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine and fentanyl for cesarean section., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Kim et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Background: Previous findings on the effect of general versus spinal anesthesia on postoperative delirium in elderly people with hip fractures are somewhat controversial. This article included the latest randomized controlled study for meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of general anesthesia (GA) and spinal anesthesia (SA) on delirium after hip fracture surgery in the elderly, so as to guide the clinical., Methods: Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web Of Science, and Embase were searched from inception up to January 16, 2024. Randomized controlled trial (RCT) was included to evaluate the postoperative results of GA and SA in elderly patients (≥50 years old) undergoing hip fracture surgery. Two researchers independently screened for inclusion in the study and extracted data. Heterogeneity was assessed by the I²and Chi-square tests, and P < .1 or I² ≥ 50% indicated marked heterogeneity among studies. The Mantel-Haenszel method was used to estimate the combined relative risk ratio (RR) and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for the binary variables., Results: Nine randomized controlled trials were included. There was no significant difference (RR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.774-1.111, P > .05) in the incidence of postoperative delirium between the GA group and the SA group. In intraoperative blood transfusion (RR = 1.0, 95% CI = 0.77-1.28, Z = 0.04, P = .971), pulmonary embolism (RR = 0.795, 95% CI = 0.332-1.904, Z = 0.59, P = .606), pneumonia (RR = 1.47, 95% CI = 0.75-2.87, P = .675), myocardial infarction (RR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.24-3.86, Z = 0.05, P = .961), heart failure (RR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.26-2.42, Z = 0.40, P = .961), urinary retention (RR = 1.42, 95% CI = 0.77-2.61, Z = 1.11, P = .267) were similar between the 2 anesthetic techniques., Conclusion: There is no significant difference in the effect of GA and SA on postoperative delirium in elderly patients with hip fracture, and their effects on postoperative complications are similar., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)