Search

Relapse remains the most common cause of treatment failure in patients receiving autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for follicular lymphoma (FL). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of adding radioimmunotherapy or rituximab (R) to BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, ara-c, melphalan) high-dose therapy for ASCT in patients with relapsed FL. Using the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry, we conducted a cohort comparison of BEAM (n=1973), Zevalin-BEAM (Z-BEAM) (n=207) and R-BEAM (n=179) and also a matched-cohort analysis of BEAM vs Z-BEAM including 282 and 154 patients, respectively. BEAM, Z-BEAM and R-BEAM groups were well balanced for age, time from diagnosis to ASCT and disease status at ASCT. The cumulative incidences of relapse (IR) at 2 years were 34, 34 and 32% for Z-BEAM, R-BEAM and BEAM, respectively. By multivariate analysis, there were no significant differences with Z-BEAM or R-BEAM compared with BEAM for IR, non-relapse mortality, event-free survival or overall survival. With the caveat that the limitations of registry analyses have to be taken into account, this study does not support adding radioimmunotherapy or R to BEAM in ASCT for relapsed FL. However, we cannot rule out the existence a particular subset of patients who could benefit from Z-BEAM conditioning that cannot be identified in our series, and this should be tested in a randomized trial.Bone Marrow Transplantation advance online publication, 22 May 2017; doi:10.1038/bmt.2017.88.

IF 5.128; International audience; The role of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) is debatable. This study investigated the outcome and prognostic factors affecting the outcome of patients undergoing ASCT for MZL. Eligible patients had non‐transformed nodal, extra‐nodal (MALT) or splenic MZL (SMZL), aged ≥18 years, who underwent a first ASCT between1994 and 2013 and were reported to the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Fondazione Italiana Linfomi or Gruppo Italiano Trapianto Di Midollo Osseo registries. The study included 199 patients, [111 MALT lymphoma, 55 nodal MZL (NMZL) and 33 SMZL]. Median age at transplantation was 56 years. The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1–8), including rituximab in 71%. 95% had chemosensitive disease. 89% received a chemotherapy‐based high‐dose regimen. There were no significant differences in patient and transplant characteristics between the 3 histological subtypes except for a lower percentage of patients previously treated with rituximab in the MALT sub‐group and more transplants performed in recent years in the other sub‐groups. After a median follow‐up of 5 years, 5‐year cumulative incidence of relapse/progression and non‐relapse mortality were 38% and 9%, respectively. Five‐year event‐free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 53% and 73%, respectively. Five‐year cumulative incidence of second malignancies was 6%. Multivariate analysis revealed age ≥65 years was associated with a shorter EFS and OS. In addition, patients with SMZL had a shorter OS than those with MALT. ASCT may provide clinical benefit in MZL patients who have failed multiple lines of chemoimmunotherapy.

Introduction:The role of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with marginal zone lymphomas (MZL) is not fully elucidated. The aim of the present study was to determine the outcome of patients undergoing ASCT for relapsed/refractory MZL, and define prognostic factors affecting that outcome. Methods: Eligible for this study were patients with nodal, extra-nodal (MALT) or splenic MZL , aged ≥18 ears, who underwent a first ASCT between July 1994 and February 2013, and reported to the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) registry, and/or the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL) and the Gruppo Italiano Trapianto di Midollo Osseo (GITMO) networks. Patients with a history of MZL transformation were excluded. Review of written diagnostic reports was mandatory for inclusion. Log rank tests were used to assess the impact of baseline characteristics on overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS). In multivariate analysis, the effect of prognostic factors was evaluated using Cox regression models. Cumulative incidence of relapse (IR) and cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) were estimated with a competing-risk approach. Risk factors for IR and NRM were estimated by Pepe & Mori test or by Fine & Gray model. Results: The study included 199 patients, 111 patients (56%) with MALT lymphoma, 55 patients with nodal MZL (28%) and 33 patients (16%) with splenic MZL.. Median age at transplantation was 56 years (range, 25-71 years). Median time from diagnosis to ASCT was 2 years (0.1-28.0). Median number of prior therapies was 1 , (range 1-8) , including rituximab in 74%. 96% were transplanted with chemosensitive disease; 70 (37%) in CR1/PR1 ,113(59%) in CR/PR >1 and 7 in SD (4%) Median calendar year of ASCT was 2006, with 17,1% of transplants being performed before 2001. Total body irradiation-based high-dose regimen was used in 16 patients (8%), whilst 92% of the patients received high-dose chemotherapy only. Median follow-up was 4.1 years (0.1-19.1). Five-year cumulative incidence of relapse/progression (IR) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were 38% (95%CI 30-45%) and 9 %( 95%CI 6-14%) respectively. Five-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 53% (95%CI 45-61%) and 73% (95%CI 65-79%), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed age >65 years to be associated with shorter EFS and a shorter OS (HR=8.6, 95%CI 2.8-26.2, p Additionally, MZL predicted a shorter OS than MALT (HR=3.2, 95%CI 1.2-8.7, p=0.023). Notably, rituximab had no statistically significant effect on transplant outcome.Risk of secondary malignancies approached 6.8%. Conclusions: ASCT is a feasible and effective procedure when offered to MZL patients younger than 65 years, even in those previously exposed to rituximab. Disclosures Zaja: MedImmune: Research Funding.