Search

Background: Decreases in symptom load and improvements in quality of life are important goals in the invasive treatment of symptomatic chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). To date, it is not known which patients profit most from the invasive treatment., Methods: This sub-analysis of the prospective, multi-centre PLA-pCi-EBO trial includes 145 patients with symptomatic CCS and successful PCI. The prespecified endpoints angina pectoris and quality of life (Seattle Angina Questionnaire-SAQ) were assessed 1 and 6 months after PCI. Predictors of symptom improvement were analyzed by logistic regression analysis., Results: Quality of life, physical limitation, and angina frequency markedly improved 6 months after PCI. Worse baseline health status (i.e., low SAQ subscales) was the best predictor of highly clinically relevant improvements (≥ 20 points in SAQ subscales) in symptom load and quality of life. Demographic factors (age, sex, body-mass index) and cardiovascular disease severity (number of involved vessels, ejection fraction) did not predict relevant improvements after PCI. The influence of psychologic traits has not previously been assessed. We found that neither optimism nor pessimism had a relevant effect on symptomatic outcome. However, patients who exercised more after PCI had a much larger improvement in quality of life despite no differences in physical limitation or angina frequency., Conclusion: PCI effectively reduces symptom load and improves quality of life in patients with symptomatic CCS. Reduced baseline health status (symptom load, quality of life) are the only relevant predictors for improvements after PCI. Physical activity after PCI is associated with greater benefits for quality of life., Trial Registry: The German Clinical Trials Register registration number is DRKS0001752., Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors have no conflict of interests to declare. Ethical approval: This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of the University of Regensburg (19-1261-101). All patients gave informed and written consent., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a main cause of morbidity and mortality. The effectiveness of coronary revascularization in chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) is still debated. Our recent study showed the superiority of coronary revascularization over optimal medical therapy (OMT) in reducing cardiovascular (CV) mortality and myocardial infarction (MI). The recent publication of the ORBITA-2 trial suggested superiority of percutaneous coronary revascularization (PCI) in reducing angina and improving quality of life. Therefore, we aimed to provide an updated meta-analysis evaluating the impact of PCI on both clinical outcomes and angina in CCS., Methods: Relevant studies were screened in PubMed/Medline until 08/01/2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PCI to OMT in CCS were selected. The primary outcome was CV death. Secondary outcomes were MI, all-cause mortality, stroke, major bleeding and angina severity., Results: Nineteen RCTs involving 8616 patients were included. Median follow-up duration was 3.3 years. Revascularization significantly reduced CV death (4.2% vs. 5.5%; OR = .77; 95% CI .62-.96, p = .02). Subgroup analyses favoured revascularization in patients without chronic total occlusions (CTOs) (p = .052) and those aged <65 years (p = .02). Finally, a follow-up duration beyond 3 years showed increased benefit of coronary revascularization (p = .04). Secondary outcomes analyses showed no significant differences, except for a lower angina severity in the revascularization group according to the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) (p = .04) and to the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) classification (p = .005)., Conclusions: PCI compared to OMT significantly reduces CV mortality and angina severity, improving quality of life in CCS patients. This benefit was larger without CTOs, in patients aged <65 years and with follow-up duration beyond 3 years., (© 2024 The Author(s). European Journal of Clinical Investigation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Stichting European Society for Clinical Investigation Journal Foundation.)

Failure to close the side branches of the internal mammary artery can result in ischemia due to coronary steal through a patent mammary artery side branch after coronary artery bypass grafting. The authors present the case of a 56-year-old man with recurrent angina after 6 month surgical myocardial revascularization underwent coronary angiography that showed patent left branch of the internal mammary artery. After demonstration of inducible ischemia, effective percutaneous treatment was performed using coil embolization, improving blood flow and clinical symptoms., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (virtual FFR) has shown excellent diagnostic performance compared with wire-based FFR. However, virtual FFR pullback curves have not been validated yet., Objectives: To validate the accuracy of virtual FFR pullback curves compared to wire-based FFR pullbacks and to assess their clinical utility using patient-reported outcomes., Methods: Pooled analysis of two prospective studies, including patients with hemodynamically significant (FFR ≤ 0.80) coronary artery disease (CAD). Virtual and wire-based FFR pullbacks were compared to assess the accuracy of virtual pullbacks to characterize CAD as focal or diffuse. Pullbacks were analyzed visually and quantitatively using the pullback pressure gradient (PPG). Patients underwent PCI, and the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) was administered at 3-month follow-up., Results: A total of 298 patients (300 vessels) with both virtual and wire-based pullbacks who underwent PCI were included in the analysis. The mean age was 61.8 ± 8.8, and 15% were female. The agreement on the visual adjudication of the CAD pattern was fair (Cohen's Kappa: 0.31, 95% confidence interval: 0.18-0.45). The mean PPG were 0.65 ± 0.18 from virtual pullbacks and 0.65 ± 0.13 from wire-based pullbacks (r = 0.68, mean difference 0, limits of agreement -0.27 to 0.28). At follow-up, patients with high virtual PPG (>0.67) had higher SAQ angina frequency scores (i.e., less angina) than those with low virtual PPG (SAQ scores 92.0 ± 14.3 vs. 85.5 ± 23.1, p = 0.022)., Conclusion: Virtual FFR pullback curves showed moderate agreement with wire-based FFR pullbacks. Nonetheless, patients with focal disease based on virtual PPG reported greater improvement in angina after PCI., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: Stimulating acupoints is beneficial for improving heart health but the clinical efficacy of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) as a complementary therapy for chronic coronary syndromes (CCSs) remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate whether TEAS can alleviate angina severity in patients with CCS and to explore the potential mechanisms underlying TEAS., Methods and Analysis: This study, conducted across two clinical centres, involved 90 participants distributed equally into three groups via simple randomisation (1:1:1 ratio). The research cycle was 28 weeks including a 4-week baseline, 12-week treatment and 12-week follow-up period. All groups will receive basic treatment with the TEAS group additionally receiving 36 sessions of TEAS stimulation over the 12 weeks. The two control groups will either undergo sham TEAS or no additional intervention alongside their basic treatment. The primary outcome is the 6-minute walk test; eight other indicators will serve as secondary outcomes., Ethics and Dissemination: Approval for this study was granted by the Medical Research Ethics Committee of the Third Clinical Affiliated Hospital of Changchun University of Chinese Medicine in May 2023. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications., Trial Registration Number: ChiCTR2400079383., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Despite tremendous therapeutic advancements, a significant proportion of coronary artery disease patients suffer from refractory angina pectoris, that is, quality-of-life-compromising angina that is non-manageable with established pharmacological and interventional treatment options. Adenoviral vascular endothelial growth factor-D ΔNΔC (AdVEGF-D)-encoding gene therapy (GT) holds promise for the treatment of refractory angina., Methods: ReGenHeart is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled and double-blinded phase 2 clinical trial that aims to study the safety and efficacy of intramyocardially administered angiogenic AdVEGF-D GT for refractory angina. Patients will be randomised in a 2:1 ratio and blocks of six to receive either AdVEGF-D or placebo. Primary endpoints are improvements in functional capacity assessed with the 6 min walking test and angina symptoms with Canadian Cardiovascular Society class after 6 month follow-up. Secondary endpoints are improvements in myocardial perfusion assessed with either positron emission tomography or single-photon emission CT after 6 month follow-up and functional capacity and angina symptoms after 12 months. In addition, changes in the quality of life, the use of angina medication and the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events will be evaluated., Conclusions: The phase 2 ReGenHeart trial will provide knowledge of the safety and efficacy of AdVEGF-D GT to ameliorate symptoms in refractory angina patients, extending and further testing positive results from the preceding phase 1/2a trial., Competing Interests: Competing interests: JEKH received consultancy fees from Novo Nordisk and speaker fees from the BMS-Pfizer alliance. JK received consultancy fees from GE Healthcare and Synektik and speaker fees from GE Healthcare, Bayer, Lundbeck, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Pfizer, Siemens Healthineers and Merck, outside of the submitted work. AS received consultancy fees from Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim and Pfizer, and speaker fees from Abbott, Astra Zeneca and Bayer. Other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Improving access to primary care physicians' services may help reduce hospitalizations due to Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions (ACSCs). Ontario, Canada's most populous province, introduced blended payment models for primary care physicians in the early- to mid-2000s to increase access to primary care, preventive care, and better chronic disease management. We study the impact of payment models on avoidable hospitalizations due to two incentivized ACSCs (diabetes and congestive heart failure) and two non-incentivized ACSCs (angina and asthma). The data for our study came from health administrative data on practicing primary care physicians in Ontario between 2006 and 2015. We employ a two-stage estimation strategy on a balanced panel of 3710 primary care physicians (1158 blended-fee-for-service (FFS), 1388 blended-capitation models, and 1164 interprofessional team-based practices). First, we account for the differences in physician practices using a generalized propensity score based on a multinomial logit regression model, corresponding to three primary care payment models. Second, we use fractional regression models to estimate the average treatment effects on the treated outcome (i.e., avoidable hospitalizations). The capitation-based model sometimes increases avoidable hospitalizations due to angina (by 7 per 100,000 patients) and congestive heart failure (40 per 100,000) relative to the blended-FFS-based model. Switching capitation physicians into interprofessional teams mitigates this effect, reducing avoidable hospitalizations from congestive heart failure by 30 per 100,000 patients and suggesting better access to primary care and chronic disease management in team-based practices., (© 2024 The Author(s). Health Economics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objectives: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a treatment option for patients with refractory angina pectoris (RAP) which was first used in 1987 and led to a reduction in the number of angina pectoris episodes, less consumption of short-acting nitrates, and an improvement in the quality of life. The conventional mode of stimulation leads to paresthesia felt at the target area. In recent years novel modes of stimulation have been developed that are paresthesia free, such as "burst," "high-density (HD)," or "high-frequency/10 kHz" stimulation. To date, these new modes of stimulation have not been used in patients with RAP and a spinal cord stimulator. This retrospective, single-center, observational study gives a description of the experience of using HD stimulation in selected patients with RAP being treated with SCS., Materials and Methods: All patients with RAP who received a spinal cord stimulator as treatment at our center from September 2009 to February 2021 were screened. Patients were eligible for inclusion into this retrospective, observational study if 1) patients had used HD stimulation, or 2) were currently using HD stimulation., Results: Fifty-three patients out of a total of 157 patients who had a spinal cord stimulator due to RAP use or have used HD stimulation. In most patients (79.2%), the reason for switching from conventional to HD stimulation was due to progression of symptoms under conventional stimulation. The average duration of conventional stimulation use prior to switching to HD stimulation was 40.3 (± 29.6) months. In total, 26 patients (of 53 patients; 49.1%) were using HD stimulation at the end of the follow-up period or until lost to follow-up, and two patients used both forms of stimulation interchangeably. Five patients (9.4%) had stopped using SCS, and 20 patients (37.7%) switched back to conventional stimulation due to a variety of reasons., Conclusions: This retrospective study shows that the use of HD stimulation in patients with RAP being treated with SCS could be an alternative option for conventional stimulation. Due to the nature of this study, additional research is essential to confirm these initial findings., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors reported no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 International Neuromodulation Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Adult stem cell therapy via intramyocardial injection of autologous CD34+ stem cells has been shown to improve exercise capacity and reduce angina frequency and mortality in patients with refractory angina (RA). However, the cost of such therapy is a limitation to its adoption in clinical practice. Our goal was to determine whether the less costly, less invasive, and widely accessible, FDA-approved alternative treatment for RA patients, known as enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP), mobilizes endogenous CD34+ stem cells and whether such mobilization is associated with the clinical benefits seen with intramyocardial injection. We monitored changes in circulating levels of CD34+/CD133+ and CD34+/KDR+ cells in RA patients undergoing EECP therapy and in a comparator cohort of RA patients undergoing an exercise regimen known as cardiac rehabilitation. Changes in exercise capacity in both cohorts were monitored by measuring treadmill times (TT), double product (DP) scores, and Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina scores between pre- and post-treatment treadmill stress tests. Circulating levels of CD34+/CD133+ cells increased in patients undergoing EECP and were significant (β = -2.38, p = 0.012) predictors of improved exercise capacity in these patients. CD34+/CD133+ cells isolated from RA patients could differentiate into endothelial cells, and their numbers increased during EECP therapy. Our results support the hypothesis that mobilized CD34+/CD133+ cells repair vascular damage and increase collateral circulation in RA patients. They further support clinical interventions that can mobilize adult CD34+ stem cells as therapy for patients with RA and other vascular diseases.

Background: Angina pectoris can occur in up to 40% of patients following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). There is limited data assessing whether the type of stent implanted during revascularization can predict post-PCI angina symptoms., Methods: In this study, data regarding revascularization characteristics including the stent type in patients admitted for PCI was collected. Prospective data including occurrence of angina and the presenting class, new onset ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and other clinical outcomes were collected at 1, 3, and 6-month follow-up intervals. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the potential predictors of angina symptoms at 6-month follow-up., Results: A total of 787 patients (64.5% males) undergoing PCI with three stent types (Orsiro, Promus, and Xience) were included in the study. The occurrence of post PCI angina pectoris and new STEMI was similar among the stent types (p > 0.05). A linear association was found between the development of new STEMI (p = 0.018) and stroke (p = 0.003) and the worsening of angina class. The stent type was not a predictor of angina during the follow-up period. Other variables including dyslipidemia (odds ratio (OR) (95% CI), 1.51 (1.08; 2.10)), prior coronary artery disease (CAD) (OR (95% CI), 1.63 (1.02; 2.61)), and previous hospitalization (OR (95% CI), 2.10 (1.22; 3.63)) were independent predictors of angina., Conclusions: Although the type of stent may not have an association with the post-PCI angina, other predictors such as dyslipidemia and previous CAD and hospitalization may predict recurrence of cardiac angina. The class of angina severity may have a linear association with new-onset STEMI and stroke., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Coronary functional testing to formally diagnose coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) reduces cardiovascular events and alleviates angina. This study aims to investigate the extensive and complex journey that patients with CMD undergo, from the onset of chest pain to eventual diagnosis., Methods: Data from the Coronary Microvascular Disease Registry (CMDR) were analyzed, including information on the date of first documentation of chest pain, number of non-invasive and invasive tests the patient underwent, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations. In addition, we estimated the total cost per patient. A total of 61 patients with CMD diagnosis were included in this analysis., Results: Most patients in our cohort were older than 50 years of age. The median time from initial chest pain symptoms to diagnosis was 0.62 (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.06-2.96) years. During this period, patients visited the emergency department a median of 1.0 (IQR: 0.0-2.0) times. Diagnostic tests included 3.0 (IQR: 2.0-6.0) electrocardiograms, 3.0 (IQR: 0.0-6.0) high-sensitivity troponin tests, and 1.0 (IQR: 1.0-2.0) echocardiograms. Prior to diagnosis of CMD, 13 (21.3 %) patients had left heart catheterization without coronary functional testing. Non-invasive testing for ischemia was conducted in 43 (70.5 %) patients. Alternative non-cardiac diagnoses were given to 11 (18.0 %) patients during the diagnostic process, with referrals made to gastroenterology for 16 (26.2 %) and pulmonology for 10 (16.4 %) patients. The cost was almost $2000/patient., Conclusion: Timely identification of CMD offers promising opportunities for prompt symptom alleviation, accompanied by reduced visits to the emergency department, cardiovascular testing, invasive medical procedures, and consequently reduced healthcare expenses., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Brian C. Case – Speaker: Zoll Medical. Hayder D. Hashim – Advisory Board, Speaker: Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Philips IGT. Ron Waksman – Advisory Board: Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Philips IGT, Pi-Cardia Ltd.; Consultant: Abbott Vascular, Append Medical, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, JC Medical, MedAlliance/Cordis, Medtronic, Philips IGT, Pi-Cardia Ltd., Swiss Interventional/SIS Medical AG, Transmural Systems Inc.; Institutional Grant Support: Biotronik, Medtronic, Philips IGT; Investor: Transmural Systems Inc. All other authors – None., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Aims: The REGENERATE-COBRA trial (NCT05711849) will assess the safety and efficacy of an intracoronary infusion of autologous bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells in refractory angina patients with no revascularization options who are symptomatic despite optimal medical and device therapy., Methods: REGENERATE-COBRA is a single site, blinded, randomized, sham-controlled, Phase II clinical trial enrolling 110 refractory angina patients with no revascularization options who are symptomatic despite optimal medical and device therapy. Patients will be randomized to either autologous bone marrow derived-mononuclear cells or a sham procedure. Patients in the cell-treated arm will undergo a bone marrow aspiration and an intracoronary infusion of autologous bone marrow derived-mononuclear cells. Patients in the control arm will undergo a sham bone marrow aspiration and a sham intracoronary infusion. The trial's primary endpoint is an improvement in Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina class by 2 classes between baseline and 6 months. Secondary endpoints include change in: CCS class at 12 months, myocardial ischemic burden (as measured by perfusion imaging) at 6 months, quality of life at 6 and 12 months (as measured by EQ-5D-5L, EQ-5D-VAS and Seattle Angina Questionnaire), angina frequency at 6 and 12 months, total exercise time (as measured by a modified Bruce protocol) and major adverse cardiovascular events at 6 and 12 months., Conclusions: This is the first trial to assess the safety and efficacy of an intracoronary infusion of autologous bone marrow-derived unfractionated mononuclear cells in symptomatic refractory angina patients who have exhausted conventional therapeutic options., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest The authors have nothing to declare., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The objective of this study was to explore functional improvements by sex for patients with refractory angina pectoris using a 6-min walk test (6MWT) after enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) therapy., Methods: All patients who completed EECP from 2015 to 2023 were identified for analysis retrospectively, utilizing the electronic medical record. Patients completed 35 1-hr EECP sessions 5 d/wk over 7 wk. All baseline and post-EECP intervention 6MWT, exertional angina, and dyspnea measurements were assessed on the first and last sessions, respectively. Paired and unpaired t tests and linear and stepwise multivariable regression analyses were performed., Results: The cohort consisted of 116 patients (24 female) with a mean age of 69 ± 13 yr. After EECP, there was a mean improvement of 128 m (72%) in distance walked during the 6MWT ( P < .001) with 126 ± 91 m improvement in males and 134 ± 73 m in females. The improvement in angina and dyspnea scores was 3.5 ± 2.1 and 4.2 ± 2.4, respectively. There were no differences between the sexes for improvements in 6MWT distance, angina, or dyspnea. Univariate associations for change in 6MWT distance included body mass index (BMI; adjusted R2  = .05) and being a nonsmoker (adjusted R2  = .03). The only independent predictor for increasing distance during 6MWT was BMI (adjusted R2  = .1; P = .001)., Conclusion: Patients who have refractory angina pectoris can improve their functional capacity while simultaneously decreasing exertional angina and dyspnea using EECP. This study highlights the equal efficacy of EECP therapy for females., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest : None, (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

The Neovasc Coronary Sinus Reducer Stent (CSRS) was developed for the treatment of patients who continue to suffer from disabling symptoms despite optimal medical therapy. This patient population with refractory angina symptoms is expected to grow, since life expectancy of individuals with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease is increasing. In this paper, we discussed the development of a novel device the CSRS and the upside-down strategy to rebuild a retrograde coronary pressure that was attenuated by the atherosclerotic disease., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Coronary sinus reducer implantation is a percutaneous technique creating a narrowing in the coronary sinus through the implantation of an hourglass-shaped endoprosthesis. It is proposed to reduce symptoms in patients suffering from refractory angina pectoris. This innovative treatment is experiencing a major craze among interventional cardiologists. It is associated with very high procedural success rates. Complications are rare and include coronary sinus dissection or perforation and migration of the device. This review exposes the device implantation technique, the potential anatomical difficulties, the tips and tricks to overcome challenging situations. It also focuses on the prevention and management of potential complications., Competing Interests: Déclaration de liens d'intérêts Les auteurs déclarent ne pas avoir de conflits d'intérêts., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Patients with angina and unobstructed coronary arteries (ANOCA) are frequently encountered in clinical practice. These cases represent a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge and are often characterized by a long patient journey until a diagnosis of coronary vasomotor disorders is established. Moreover, the unsatisfactory management of such patients leads to insecurity, ongoing symptoms, and psychological sequelae such as anxiety or depression. Currently, the psychological burden in patients with ANOCA is underestimated, underexplored, and undertreated. This review gives a new perspective on the pathophysiology of coronary vasomotor disorders including psychological risk factors and calls for comprehensive care by interdisciplinary ANOCA clinics., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Background: In stable coronary artery disease, 30% to 60% of patients remain symptomatic despite successful revascularization. Perhaps not all symptoms reported by a patient with myocardial ischemia are, in fact, angina., Objectives: This study sought to determine whether independent symptom verification using a placebo-controlled ischemic stimulus could distinguish which patients achieve greatest symptom relief from percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)., Methods: ORBITA-STAR was a multicenter, n-of-1, placebo-controlled study in patients undergoing single-vessel PCI for stable symptoms. Participants underwent 4 episodes (60 seconds each) of low-pressure balloon occlusion across their coronary stenosis, randomly paired with 4 episodes of placebo inflation. Following each episode, patients reported the similarity of the induced symptom in comparison with their usual symptom. The similarity score ranged from -10 (placebo replicated the symptom more than balloon occlusion) to +10 (balloon occlusion exactly replicated the symptom). The primary endpoint was the ability of the similarity score to predict symptom relief with PCI., Results: Fifty-one patients were recruited, aged 62.9 ± 8.6 years. The median fractional flow reserve was 0.68 (Q1-Q3: 0.57-0.79), and the instantaneous wave-free ratio was 0.80 (Q1-Q3: 0.48-0.89). The median similarity score was 3 (Q1-Q3: 0.875-5.25). The similarity score was a strong predictor of symptom improvement following PCI: a patient with an upper quartile similarity score of 5.25 was significantly more likely to have lower angina frequency at follow-up (OR: 8.01; 95% credible interval: 2.39-15.86) than a patient with a lower quartile similarity score of 0.875 (OR: 1.31; 95% credible interval: 0.71-1.99), Pr (difference) >99.9%., Conclusions: Similarity score powerfully predicted symptom improvement from PCI. These data lay the foundation for independent symptom mapping to target PCI to those patients most likely to benefit. (Systematic Trial of Angina Assessment Before Revascularization [ORBITA-STAR]; NCT04280575)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This work has received support from the National Institute for Health and Care Research Imperial Biomedical Research Centre and the Imperial College British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence. Dr Rajkumar has received a Clinical Research Training Fellowship from the Medical Research Council; has received speaker fees from Menarini; and has received consulting fees from Philips. Dr Foley has received a Clinical Research Training Fellowship from the Medical Research Council; and has received speaker fees from Menarini and Philips. Dr Ahmed-Jushuf has received a Clinical Research Training Fellowship from the Medical Research Council. Dr Simader has received sponsorship from Servier. Dr Sen has received speaker and consulting fees from Philips, Medtronic, Recor, and AstraZeneca. Dr Petraco has received consulting fees from Philips and Abbott. Dr Nijjer has received speaker fees from Philips Volcano, Pfizer, Bayer, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Amarin. Dr Dungu has received grants from Medtronic and Abbott; has received sponsorship from Vascular Perspectives, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Abbott; and has received speaker honoraria from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Novartis. Dr Kotecha has received honoraria from Bayer and Janssen. Dr Cole holds shares in Mycardium AI. Dr Howard holds shares in Mycardium AI. Dr Keeble has served on the advisory boards of Abbott Vascular and SMT; and has received institutional research funding from Terumo, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, Philips Volcano, and Cardionovum. Dr O’Kane has received speaker fees from Abbott Vascular, Biosensors, Boston Scientific, HeartFlow, Medtronic, Philips, Shockwave, and Terumo. Dr Al-Lamee has received an Intermediate Research Fellowship from the British Heart Foundation [FS/ICRF/22/26051]; has served on the advisory boards of Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Abbott, and Philips; and has received speaker honoraria from Abbott, Philips, Medtronic, Servier, Omniprex, and Menarini. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Aims: We examine the effects of symptoms and cardiovascular disease (CVD) events on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and healthcare costs in a European population with atrial fibrillation (AF)., Methods and Results: In the EURObservational Research Programme on AF long-term general registry, AF patients from 250 centres in 27 European countries were enrolled and followed for 2 years. We used fixed effects models to estimate the association of symptoms and CVD events on HRQOL and annual healthcare costs. We found significant decrements in HRQOL in AF patients in whom ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) [-0.075 (95% confidence interval -0.144, -0.006)], angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) [-0.037 (-0.071, -0.003)], new-onset/worsening heart failure [-0.064 (-0.088, -0.039)], bleeding events [-0.031 (-0.059, -0.003)], thromboembolic events [-0.071 (-0.115, -0.027)], mild symptoms [0.037 (-0.048, -0.026)], or severe/disabling symptoms [-0.090 (-0.108, -0.072)] occurred during the follow-up. During follow-up, annual healthcare costs were associated with an increase of €11 718 (€8497, €14 939) in patients with STEMI, €5823 (€4757, €6889) in patients with angina/NSTEMI, €3689 (€3219, €4158) in patients with new-onset or worsening heart failure, €3792 (€3315, €4270) in patients with bleeding events, and €3182 (€2483, €3881) in patients with thromboembolic events, compared with AF patients without these events. Healthcare costs were primarily driven by inpatient costs. There were no significant differences in HRQOL or healthcare resource use between EU regions or by sex., Conclusion: Symptoms and CVD events are associated with a high burden on AF patients and healthcare systems throughout Europe., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: J.L., A.G., and R.L.F. report research grants from ESC. A.D.T. has stock in two start-up companies, receiving no income from these investments. A.T. has a consultancy agreement with ESC. A.P.M. reports payments from Astra Zeneca, Novartis, Sanofi, and Bayer for participation in study committees in areas outside the present work. P.V. reports consulting fees from Servier International, Hygeia Hospital Group, and ESC. M.W.A., R.H., and M.L. report no disclosures., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Objective: This study investigated differences in clinical outcomes between mixed angina (MA) and pure vasospastic angina (PVA)., Methods: A total of 524 vasospastic angina patients who did or did not have >50% coronary artery stenosis from January 2005 to January 2021 were divided into two groups (Group 1: PVA, N  = 399; Group 2: MA, N  = 125) and then three groups [Group 1: PVA, N  = 399; Group 2: MA without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), N  = 67; Group 3: MA with PCI, N  = 58] for assessment. We recorded the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE: the composite of death, myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke or rehospitalization) during 3-year clinical follow-up., Results: Compared to the PVA group, there were significant differences in MACCE (20.8% vs. 11.8%, P  = 0.011) and rehospitalization (20.0% vs. 9.8%, P  = 0.002) in the MA group. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients in the MA with PCI group had the highest cumulative incidence rate of MACCE during the 3-year follow-up (log-rank P  < 0.001)., Conclusion: Compared with the PVA patients, MA patients had significantly worse clinical outcomes during long-term follow-up., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

The effectiveness of ischemic postconditioning (iPoC) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) without ischemic preconditioning has not been determined. Therefore, we investigated the impact of iPoC and its potential mechanism related to heat shock protein 72 (HSP72) induction on myocardial salvage in patients with STEMI without prodromal angina (PA).We retrospectively analyzed data from 102 patients with STEMI with successful reperfusion among 323 consecutive patients with acute coronary syndrome. Among these, 55 patients with iPoC (iPoC (+) ) underwent 4 cycles of 60-second inflation and 30-second deflation of the angioplasty balloon. Both the iPoC (+) and iPoC (-) groups were divided into 2 further subgroups: patients with PA (PA (+) ) and those without (PA (-) ). We analyzed HSP72 levels in neutrophils, which were measured until 48 hours after reperfusion. I-123 β-methyl-p-iodophenyl-pentadecanoic acid (BMIPP) scintigraphy was performed within a week of reperfusion therapy. In 64% of patients, thallium-201 (TL) scintigraphy was performed 6-8 months after STEMI onset.Using BMIPP and TL, in the PA (-) subgroups, the iPoC (+) group had a significantly greater myocardial salvage ratio than the iPoC (-) group. iPoC was identified as an independent predictor of the myocardial salvage ratio. The HSP72 increase ratio was significantly elevated in the iPoC (+) PA (-) group. Importantly, the myocardial salvage effect in patients without PA was significantly correlated with the HSP72 increase ratio, which was greater in patients with iPoC.These results suggest the potential impact of iPoC via HSP72 induction on myocardial salvage; however, the effects may be limited to patients with STEMI without PA.

Background: Clinical management of patients with angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) is still challenging. This scenario affects up to 50% of patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography due to suspected coronary artery disease. Many patients report a long and debilitating history before adequate diagnostics and management are initiated., Objectives: This article describes the current recommendations for diagnostic assessments and treatment in patients with ANOCA. Focus is placed on invasive diagnostics in the catheter laboratory, pharmacological/interventional treatment as well as the patient journey., Results: In patients with ANOCA, the current European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines suggest that invasive assessments using acetylcholine and adenosine for the diagnosis of an underlying coronary vasomotor disorder should be considered. Acetylcholine is used to diagnose coronary spasm, whereas adenosine is used in conjunction with a wire-based assessment for the measurement of coronary flow reserve and microvascular resistance. The invasive assessments allow the determination of what are referred to as endotypes (coronary spasm, impaired coronary flow reserve, enhanced microvascular resistance or a combination thereof). Establishing a diagnosis is helpful to: (a) initiate targeted treatment to improve quality of life, (b) reassure the patient that a cardiac cause is found and (c) to assess individual prognosis., Conclusions: Currently, patients with ANOCA are often not adequately managed. Referral to specialised centres is recommended to prevent long and debilitating patient histories until expertise in diagnosis and treatment becomes more widespread., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Background: XC001 is a novel adenoviral-5 vector designed to express multiple isoforms of VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) and more safely and potently induce angiogenesis. The EXACT trial (Epicardial Delivery of XC001 Gene Therapy for Refractory Angina Coronary Treatment) assessed the safety and preliminary efficacy of XC001 in patients with no option refractory angina., Methods: In this single-arm, multicenter, open-label trial, 32 patients with no option refractory angina received a single treatment of XC001 (1×10 11 viral particles) via transepicardial delivery., Results: There were no severe adverse events attributed to the study drug. Twenty expected severe adverse events in 13 patients were related to the surgical procedure. Total exercise duration increased from a mean±SD of 359.9±105.55 seconds at baseline to 448.2±168.45 (3 months), 449.2±175.9 (6 months), and 477.6±174.7 (12 months; +88.3 [95% CI, 37.1-139.5], +84.5 [95% CI, 34.1-134.9], and +115.5 [95% CI, 59.1-171.9]). Total myocardial perfusion deficit on positron emission tomography imaging decreased by 10.2% (95% CI, -3.1% to 23.5%), 14.3% (95% CI, 2.8%-25.7%), and 10.2% (95% CI, -0.8% to -21.2%). Angina frequency decreased from a mean±SD 12.2±12.5 episodes to 5.2±7.2 (3 months), 5.1±7.8 (6 months), and 2.7±4.8 (12 months), with an average decrease of 7.7 (95% CI, 4.1-11.3), 6.6 (95% CI, 3.5-9.7), and 8.8 (4.6-13.0) episodes at 3, 6, and 12 months. Angina class improved in 81% of participants at 6 months., Conclusions: XC001 administered via transepicardial delivery is safe and generally well tolerated. Exploratory improvements in total exercise duration, ischemic burden, and subjective measures support a biologic effect sustained to 12 months, warranting further investigation., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04125732., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Nakamura received institutional research support from XyloCor Therapeutics and consulting fees from XyloCor Therapeutics and Sana Biotechnology. Dr Henry received consulting fees (Steering Committee) from XyloCor Therapeutics. Dr Latter received consulting fees from and is a data and safety monitoring board (DSMB) member of XyloCor Therapeutics. Dr Mokadam received consulting fees from Abbott, Medtronic, SynCardia, and XyloCor Therapeutics and is a DSMB member of XyloCor Therapeutics, Medtronic, and Carmat. Dr Williams received consulting fees from XyloCor Therapeutics. Dr Sun received consulting fees from Abbott Vascular and is a DSMB member of 4C Medical and Abbott. Dr DiCarli received institutional research support from XyloCor Therapeutics and Gilead Sciences, consulting fees from Sanofi and MedTrace Pharma, and institutional in-kind research support from Amgen. Dr Chaitman received consulting fees and institutional research support from XyloCor Therapeutics. M.W. Peterson is an employee of XyloCor Therapeutics. D.G. Byrnes is an employee of XyloCor Therapeutics. Dr Ohman is an employee of Amgen. Dr Pepine received institutional research support from XyloCor Therapeutics, BioCardia, Caladrius, Duke Clinical Research Institute, the Gatorade Foundation, the McJunkin Family Foundation Trust, Mesoblast, National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute/National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network, Pfizer, Sanofi, University of Florida Clinical and Translational Science Institute, and US Department of Defense and consulting fees from AbbVie, Akros, BioCardia, Bloomer Tech, Caladrius, Imbria Pharmaceuticals, Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Milestone Pharmaceuticals, and Verily Life Sciences LLC. Dr Crystal received consulting fees from and has equity in XyloCor Therapeutics. Dr Rosengart is an advisor of, is a board of directors member of, and received consulting fees, royalties, and honoraria from XyloCor Therapeutics. Dr Kowalewski received institutional research support from XyloCor Therapeutics. Dr Koch received institutional research support from XyloCor Therapeutics. Dr Dittrich is an employee of XyloCor Therapeutics. Dr Povsic received institutional research support from XyloCor Therapeutics, CSL Behring, Priovant, Bayer, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, UCB Biopharma SRL, BodyPort, and Merck Pharmaceuticals; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Biocardia, Boehringer Ingelheim, Caladrius Biosciences, Recardio, Veralox Therapeutics, Sana Biotechnology, Inc, Guidepoint Global LLC, and the Gerson Lehrman Group; is a DSMB member of Corvia, Novo Nordisk, and Parexel International; and has leadership or fiduciary role in the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology.

We report the case of a 79-year-old male patient who benefited from the implantation of a coronary sinus reducer (CSR) (Reducer; Neovasc, Inc.) in the management of typical angina with mild exertion with optimal medical treatment.

Coronary physiology assessment, including epicardial and microvascular investigations, is a fundamental tool in the contemporary management of patients with coronary artery disease. Coronary revascularisation guided by functional evaluation has demonstrated superiority over angiography-only-guided treatment. In patients with chronic coronary syndrome, revascularisation did not demonstrate prognostic advantage in terms of mortality over optimal medical therapy (OMT). However, revascularisation of coronary stenosis, which induces myocardial ischaemia, has demonstrated better outcome than OMT alone. Pressure wire (PW) or angiography-based longitudinal coronary physiology provides a point-by-point analysis of the vessel to detect the atherosclerotic pattern of coronary disease. A careful evaluation of this disease pattern allows clinicians to choose the appropriate management strategy.Patients with diffuse disease showed a twofold risk of residual angina after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) than those with focal disease. Therefore, OMT alone or coronary artery bypass graft might be considered over PCI. In addition, the post-PCI physiological assessment aims to optimise the result revealing residual myocardial ischaemia. Improvement in post-PCI PW or angiography-based functional indices has been associated with better quality of life and reduced risk of cardiac events and residual angina. Therefore, the information obtained from coronary physiology allows for an optimised treatment strategy, which ultimately leads to improve patient's prognosis and quality of life. This review provides an overview of the latest available evidence in the literature regarding the use of functional assessment of epicardial coronary stenosis in different settings in the contemporary patient-tailored management of coronary disease., Competing Interests: Competing interests: VK is an associate editor for Heart., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Background: Since typical angina has become less frequent, it is unclear if this symptom still has prognostic significance., Methods: We evaluated 38,383 patients undergoing stress/rest SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging followed for a median of 10.9 years. After dividing patients by clinical symptoms, we evaluated the magnitude of myocardial ischemia and subsequent mortality among medically treated versus revascularized subgroups following testing., Results: Patients with typical angina had more frequent and greater ischemia than other symptom groups, but not higher mortality. Among typical angina patients, those who underwent early revascularization had substantially greater ischemia than the medically treated subgroup, including a far higher proportion with severe ischemia (44.9% vs 4.3%, P < 0.001) and transient ischemic dilation of the LV (31.3% vs 4.7%, P < 0.001). Nevertheless, the revascularized typical angina subgroup had a lower adjusted mortality risk than the medically treated subgroup (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.57-0.92, P = 0.009) CONCLUSIONS: Typical angina is associated with substantially more ischemia than other clinical symptoms. However, the high referral of patients with typical angina patients with ischemia to early revascularization resulted in this group having a lower rather than higher mortality risk versus other symptom groups. These findings illustrate the need to account for "treatment bias" among prognostic studies., (Copyright © 2024 American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Refractory angina pectoris (RAP) defined as chronic anginal chest pain because of coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major problem. The increase in the number of patients with RAP in recent years is because of the increasing aging population and improved survival rates among patients with CAD. Management of patients with RAP is often extremely challenging. In this review, we present several interventional approaches for RAP, including device therapies, lifestyle intervention, and cell therapies. Some of these treatments are currently used in the management of RAP, whereas other treatments are under investigation., (Copyright © 2023 Italian Federation of Cardiology - I.F.C. All rights reserved.)

Background: The underlying mechanisms responsible for the clinical benefits following coronary sinus narrowing and pressure elevation remain unclear. The present study aims to investigate whether coronary sinus narrowing improves the indexes of coronary microcirculatory function., Methods: Patients with refractory angina who had a clinical indication for reducer implantation underwent invasive physiological assessments before and 4 months after the procedure. The primary outcome was the change in the values of the index of microcirculatory resistance. Secondary end points included changes in coronary flow reserve and the resistive resistance ratio values. Angina status was assessed with the Canadian Cardiology Society class and the Seattle Angina Questionnaire., Results: Twenty-four patients with a history of obstructive coronary artery disease and prior coronary revascularization (surgical and percutaneous) treated with reducer implantation were enrolled, and 21 of them (87%) underwent repeated invasive coronary physiological assessment after 4 months. The index of microcirculatory resistance values decreased from 33.35±19.88 at baseline to 15.42±11.36 at 4-month follow-up ( P <0.001; mean difference, -17.90 [95% CI, -26.16 to -9.64]). A significant (≥20% from baseline) reduction of the index of microcirculatory resistance was observed in 15 (71.4% [95% CI, 47.8%-88.7%]) patients. The number of patients with abnormal index of microcirculatory resistance (≥25) decreased from 12 (57%) to 4 (19%; P =0.016). Coronary flow reserve increased from 2.46±1.52 to 4.20±2.52 (mean difference, 1.73 [95% CI, 0.51-2.96]). Similar findings were observed for resistive resistance ratio values. Overall, 16 patients (76.1%) had an improvement of 1 Canadian Cardiology Society class. Seattle Angina Questionnaire summary score increase of around 3 points (3.01 [95% CI, 1.39-4.61])., Conclusions: Coronary sinus reduction implantation is associated with a significant improvement in the parameters of coronary microcirculatory function. These findings provide insights into the improvement of angina symptoms and may have implications for the treatment of coronary microvascular dysfunction., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05174572., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Campo received research grants from SMT, Eukon, Siemens, GE Healthcare, and Abbott Vascular outside the present work. Dr Biscaglia received research grants from SMT, Eukon, Siemens, GE Healthcare, and Abbott Vascular outside the present work. Dr Banai is the medical director of Neovasc, Inc. The other authors report no conflicts.

Myocardial bridging (MB) is a congenital variation in which a coronary artery segment tunnels through the myocardium instead of following its usual epicardial route. Although MB is usually diagnosed incidentally and has a good long-term prognosis, it can lead to complications such as angina, myocardial infarction, arrhythmias, and sudden death. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in patients with MB and medically refractory angina. The study included 12 patients with significant MB who did not respond to maximal medical therapy and underwent DES implantation. The patients were followed up for a mean duration of 33 months. The procedural success rate was 92%, with only 1 patient experiencing acute coronary artery rupture during the procedure. During the follow-up period, none of the patients reported angina symptoms, required additional percutaneous coronary intervention, or developed stent thrombosis. One patient (8.3%) died from a non-cardiac cause. The procedure demonstrates a high procedural success rate and leads to favorable long-term outcomes, including the absence of angina symptoms and the avoidance of stent-related complications. In conclusion, this study suggests that DES implantation can serve as an effective treatment option for selected patients with medically refractory angina and significant MB., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Refractory Angina (RA) is an increasingly common clinical diagnosis, in which patients unsuitable for further percutaneous or surgical procedures experience anginal symptoms, despite receiving optimal medical therapy. This clinical condition challenges the everyday activities and diminishes the quality of life of these patients. A wide variety of novel therapies for this type of angina are being investigated for clinical use. One of them is coronary sinus narrowing, which is performed as a percutaneous interventional procedure using catheter-delivered device, the Reducer. The device is implanted in the coronary sinus creating a physical narrowing and a pressure gradient in the sinus. This intervention improves the impaired blood flow in the ischemic regions of the heart leading to the relief of the anginal symptoms and, therefore, the overall clinical improvement of these patients. Several clinical trials have established both the safety and efficacy of the coronary sinus Reducer, while ongoing trials are aiming to further establish the procedure's safety and efficiency in both RA and other cardiovascular diseases, such as coronary microvascular dysfunction. This review aims to discuss the pathophysiology and the role of the coronary sinus Reducer in RA, the clinical trials documenting its safety and efficacy, as well as the future perspectives of this procedure among cardiovascular diseases., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) is an effective and noninvasive treatment for patients with refractory angina and chronic heart failure. However, previous studies evaluating the influence of EECP on endothelial function showed inconsistent results. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the effects of EECP on endothelial function measured by brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD)., Design: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang databases were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing the influence of EECP versus usual care on FMD in adult population. A random-effects model incorporating the potential influence of heterogeneity was used to pool the results., Results: Nineteen studies with 1647 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with usual care or conventional therapy, additional treatment with EECP for 3-7 weeks was associated with a significantly improved FMD (mean difference [ MD ]: 1.96%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.57-2.36, p  < 0.001, I 2 = 52%). Subgroup analysis showed consistent results in patients with coronary artery disease and in patients with other diseases ( p for subgroup difference = 0.21). Results of meta-regression analysis showed that the mean baseline FMD level was positively correlated with the influence of EECP on FMD (coefficient = 0.42, p  < 0.001). Results of subgroup analysis suggested that the increment of FMD following EECP was larger in patients with baseline FMD ≥ 5% ( MD : 2.69, 95% CI: 2.27-3.10, p  < 0.001; I 2 = 15%) compared to those with baseline FMD < 5% ( MD : 1.49, 95% CI: 1.13-1.85, p  < 0.001; I 2 = 0%; p for subgroup difference < 0.001)., Conclusions: EECP may be effective in improving endothelial function measured by FMD.

Objectives. To compare long-term angina pectoris relief of successful versus failed percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions (CTO PCI). Background. Previous studies demonstrate better short-term angina pectoris relief of CTO PCI than with optimal medical treatment (OMT), however, data on the long-term effects are lacking. Methods. 295 patients undergoing CTO PCI were analyzed retrospectively, with a follow-up evaluation of symptoms of angina pectoris and all-cause death one to four years after the intervention. The primary outcome was long-term relief of symptoms of angina pectoris. Secondary outcomes included a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and later target vessel revascularization (TVR). At follow-up, patients were interviewed for symptoms of angina pectoris at 1, 6, 12, and 22 to 48 months after the intervention. Results. CTO PCI was successful in 225 (76%) patients and failed in 70 (24%) patients. Short-term (six months) relief of angina pectoris was observed in both groups, but only the successful CTO PCI group showed long-term relief. The Kaplan-Meier curves of all-cause death did not differ between the groups ( p  = .715). The final follow-up was a mean (range) of 37 (25 to 44) months after the intervention in the successful CTO PCI group, and 33 (28 to 48) months in the failed CTO PCI group. Conclusions. Successful CTO PCI is associated with better long-term relief of symptoms of angina pectoris compared to failed CTO PCI.

Objectives: Five to 10% of patients with stable coronary artery disease have refractory angina pectoris (RAP). These patients are restricted in performing daily activities due to angina pectoris. Spinal cord stimulation is a last resort treatment option. A number of this patient population also has an indication for a cardiac implanted electronic device (CIED) (pacemaker or implantable cardiac defibrillator). Manufacturers of spinal cord stimulators have stated a warning that interference can occur between the spinal cord stimulator and the CIED. Consequently, only a limited number of patients with RAP and a CIED have received a spinal cord stimulator. The aim of this retrospective cohort study is to determine whether spinal cord stimulation can be safely used in patients with RAP and a CIED., Materials and Methods: All patients with RAP referred to our center were screened and included if 1) the patient received a spinal cord stimulator as treatment for RAP and if 2) the patient received a CIED either prior to or after spinal cord stimulator implantation. A transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) treadmill test was used as a screening tool to determine whether the patient was eligible for implantation of a spinal cord stimulator. Interference between the spinal cord stimulator and CIED was checked 1) after TENS treadmill test, 2) during implantation of spinal cord stimulator or CIED, 3) during mode switches of the SCS, and 4) during regular out patient follow-up., Results: In total, 22 patients had both a spinal cord stimulator and a CIED with an average follow-up duration of 44.5 months. No interference between the spinal cord stimulator and CIED was found., Conclusion: Spinal cord stimulation can be safely applied in patients with a CIED provided that the CIED is checked for interference during implantation, if mode switches of the SCS occurred and once yearly after implantation according to routine follow-up., (Copyright © 2022 International Neuromodulation Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Background: Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) comprises a variety of pathogenic mechanisms that impair the microcirculation of the heart. Clinical studies have shown that 30-50% of patients suffering from myocardial ischemia without significant coronary artery stenosis have CMD. The disease is associated with ele - vated mortality and poor quality of life. Whenever a patient presents with symptoms of angina pectoris and no underlying disease is detected by the usual methods, CMD should be considered a possible cause., Methods: This review is based on publications retrieved by a selective search in PubMed and on current international guidelines and recommendations of specialty societies., Results: The diagnosis of CMD is based on objective evidence of a microvascular origin of symptoms. The guidelines contain a class IIa recommendation for invasive coronary flow reserve and microvascular resistance measurements. Noninvasive tests such as positron emission tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging are less accurate and are given a class IIb recommendation. No highquality therapeutic trials are available to date, and the treatment of CMD is thus based on that of chronic coronary syndrome. Lifestyle modification is performed to reduce risk factors. Patients with an abnormal coronary flow reserve or elevated microvascular resistance can be treated with an ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker. Beta-blockers and calcium channel antagonists can relieve angina pectoris. Statins lower the LDL level and have positive pleiotropic effects. First-line treatment can be supplemented with further medications., Conclusion: Approximately 25% of patients with CMD have symptoms that do not respond to intensive treatment with the currently available modalities. New treatments, including interventional therapies, are being studied. Their long-term benefit remains to be assessed and compared to that of the existing methods.

The Coronary Sinus Reducer® (CSR) is an emerging therapy for refractory angina recommended once no further pharmacologic or coronary revascularization options are available. We present the case of a 72-year-old man who underwent CSR implantation. Complex coronary sinus anatomy necessitated an innovative "grandmother, mother, and child" catheter approach., (© 2023 The Authors. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Chronic total occlusion (CTO) is a common finding in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease and has a distinctive role in these patients' quality of life. However, there is still a lack of evidence of correct patient selection for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). From July 2017 to August 2020, 68 patients with successful PCI of a CTO and previous evidence of viability for PCI by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) were prospectively included in this single-centre observational study. Of these patients, 62 underwent follow-up CMR, and 56 underwent surveys using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire before PCI and 3, 12 and 24 months after PCI. The CMR results were assessed for volumetric, functional and deformation parameters. From the baseline to the follow-up, there was a significant reduction in the left ventricular volumes (all p < 0.001) and an increase in the left ventricular ejection fraction (57.6 ± 11.6% vs. 60.3 ± 9.4%, p = 0.006). Among the deformation parameters, only the left ventricular radial strain showed significant improvement. The SAQ showed an early improvement that emphasised angina stability and frequency as well as a summary score, which persisted after 24 months. A low SAQ summary score before PCI was the best predictive factor of good clinical improvement thereafter. Improvements in myocardial function and quality of life can be achieved with PCI of a CTO. Patient selection for PCI should be performed primarily among relevantly symptomatic patients when evidence of viability for PCI is present. The SAQ can help guide such patient selection.Trial registration ISRCTN, identifier: ISRCTN33203221. Retrospectively registered on 01.04.2020. https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN33203221., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Refractory angina (RA) is a chronic condition of coronary artery disease (CAD). Endothelial function (EF) measured by flow-mediated dilation (FMD) is an important prognostic marker in CAD. Exercise training is a stimulus that improves EF in CAD. However, exercise training effects on EF in RA are unknown. Therefore, we aimed to verify the effects of exercise training on EF in RA. This was a longitudinal, non-randomized clinical study, involving patients with patients limited by angina, aged 45 to 75 years. Patients were prospectively allocated by convenience to either exercise trained (ET) or control group (C). Laboratory analysis, cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET), and FMD were implemented at inclusion and after 12 weeks of exercise training or clinical treatment period. Exercise training included 60 minutes per session, 3 times a week, including 40 minutes of aerobic exercise on anginal threshold heart rate obtained on the CPET, 15 minutes of resistance training, and 5 minutes of stretching. A total of 38 patients were included (mean age 60 ± 9 years, 22 men); 21 were allocated to the ET and 17 to the C group. Baseline measures showed no differences between groups. After 12 weeks glycated hemoglobin and systolic blood pressure were lower in ET before than ET after (p = 0.004, and p = 0.05, respectively), and exercise time of the CPET was lower in ET before than ET after (p = 0.002). Exercise training did not change FMD. In conclusion, exercise training performed on anginal threshold increases exercise tolerance but causes no changes in EF in patients with RA., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)