Search

This study aimed to measure relative telomere length (RTL) in blood leukocytes of advanced-stage NSCLC patients either with or without Osimertinib-induced ADRs and determine whether RTL could serve as a biomarker of Osimertinib-induced ADRs. Blood leukocytes RTL were measured in 63 advanced-stage NSCLC patients and 62 age-matched healthy controls using real-time polymerase chain reaction. In patients with advanced-stage NSCLC, RTL was significantly shorter than that in healthy controls (P < 0.001). Compared to patients without ADRs and those with mild/moderate ADRs, patients with severe ADRs exhibited significantly decreased RTL (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively). ROC curve analysis uncovered a diagnostic value of RTL as a biomarker of Osimertinib-induced ADRs (AUC = 1.000, P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significant association between shorter RTL and increased cumulative incidence of Osimertinib-induced ADRs in patients with advanced-stage NSCLC (P < 0.001). Shorter RTL in blood leukocytes would reflect the occurrence of Osimertinib-induced ADRs and might emerge as a promising biomarker for identifying advanced-stage NSCLC patients who are at risk of experiencing Osimertinib-induced ADRs, particularly those with severe ADRs., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: FLT3-ITD AML is associated with an increased risk of relapse, leading many patients to receive an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT) after induction. Unfortunately, relapse rate after alloHCT remains high and strategies are needed to improve outcomes., Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of adult patients with FLT3-ITD AML who received alloHCT from 6/1/2016 to 12/31/2020 and received gilteritinib (GILT) or sorafenib (SORA)as post-transplant maintenance, outside of a clinical trial., Results: A total of 55 patients were treated with either GILT (n = 27) or SORA (n = 29) for post-HCT maintenance. One patient was treated with SORA after first alloHCT and GILT after second alloHCT. Patient characteristics were comparable between groups. FLT3 inhibitors were utilized in pre-alloHCT therapy in all but 1 patient. The median duration of time that patients remained on GILT was 385 days (range, 10-804) and on SORA 315 days (range, 3-1777). 1-year PFS and relapse incidence were similar between GILT and SORA; PFS was 66% versus 76% (P = .4) and relapse incidence was 19% versus 24% (P = .6), respectively.Both groups had high incidence of Grade 3-4 hematological toxicity, including neutropenia (45% GILT and 34% SORA) and thrombocytopenia (30% GILT and 52% SORA). Only 44% and 14% patients who received GILT and SORA did not discontinue maintenance, respectively., Conclusion: Our results revealed comparable PFS and a similar toxicity profile when SORA and GILT are used as post- HCT maintenance therapy., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

We present a case of a patient diagnosed with FLT3 mut+ acute myeloid leukemia with FLT3 and NMP1 mutations who did not respond to standard induction and consolidation treatment with chemotherapy. Due to the FLT3mut+ gene mutation and intermediate cytogenetic risk, treatment with gilteritinib is requested. After treatment she experienced a neutrophilic dermatosis and granuloma annulare that was resolved with gilteritinib dose reduction and specific treatment in coordination with the dermatology department., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Although bosutinib is generally safe and effective, drug-related toxicities (DRTs) such as diarrhea or increased transaminase levels often lead to treatment discontinuation. To clarify whether a lower initial dose of bosutinib (i.e., starting at 200 mg) would reduce rates of discontinuation due to DRTs, we conducted a phase 2 study of BOsutinib Gradual Increase (BOGI trial, UMIN 000032282) as a second/third-line treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Between February 4, 2019 and May 24, 2022, 35 patients were enrolled. The rate of bosutinib discontinuation at 12 months was 25.7% vs. 35.9% in a historical control study (Japanese phase 1/2 study) (p = 0.102). The rate of bosutinib discontinuation due to DRTs was significantly lower, at 11.4% vs. 28.2% (p = 0.015). The incidence of grade 3/4 transaminase elevation was 20% vs. 29% (p = 0.427), while the incidence of diarrhea was 3% vs. 25% (p = 0.009). The median dose intensity of bosutinib was higher (391.7 mg/day vs. 353.9 mg/day). Pharmacokinetic analysis of bosutinib showed that patients who achieved a major molecular response tended to have high trough concentrations. Thus, a low initial dose of bosutinib followed by dose escalation reduced discontinuation due to severe DRTs while maintaining high dose intensity and efficacy., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

This final analysis from the phase 4 BYOND trial reports outcomes with bosutinib in patients with previously treated chronic myeloid leukemia (CML); 163 patients with CML resistant/intolerant to previous tyrosine kinase inhibitors received bosutinib (starting dose: 500 mg QD). At study completion (median follow-up, 47.8 months), 48.1% (n = 75/156) of patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic phase CML were still receiving treatment. Among evaluable patients, 71.8% (95% CI, 63.9-78.9) and 59.7% (95% CI, 51.4-67.7) attained or maintained major molecular response (MMR) and molecular response (MR) 4 , respectively, at any time on treatment. The majority of patients achieved a deeper molecular response relative to baseline while on bosutinib. Kaplan-Meier probabilities (95% CI) of maintaining MMR and MR 4 at 36 months were 87.2% (78.0-92.7) and 80.7% (69.4-88.1), respectively. At 48 months, the Kaplan-Meier overall survival rate was 88.3% (95% CI, 81.8-92.6); there were 17 deaths, including 2 that were considered CML related. Long-term adverse events (AEs) were consistent with the known safety profile of bosutinib, and no new safety issues were identified. The management of AEs through dose reduction maintained efficacy while improving tolerability. These results support the use of bosutinib in patients with previously treated CML.ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02228382., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR) are linked with side effects involving skin and mucosa. Herein, we present a unique case of oral lichenoid drug eruption (LDE) in a patient treated with osimertinib., Case Report: A 75-year-old woman was diagnosed with metastatic EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma, and started on osimertinib 80 mg PO daily. At 24 months of therapy, the patient developed a painful, red, and white striated oral lesion involving the left buccal mucosa and the adjacent buccal aspect of gingivae. Biopsy showed oral LDE. Causality assessment between osimertinib and the oral LDE via Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction probability scale revealed a score of 5., Management and Outcome: Osimetinib discontinuation was not felt to be in the best interest of the patient. Therefore, diphenhydramine HCL mouthwash every 6 h PRN (before meals) was started. Spicy and hot foods were discontinued. At a four-week follow-up visit, the patient reported moderate improvement in her symptoms., Conclusion: Oral LDEs are considered premalignant lesions as they can transform into squamous cell carcinoma; therefore, regular follow-up is needed. Awareness of this potential side effect of osimertinib would also prevent unnecessary (and potentially costly) work-up and lead to its prompt diagnosis and treatment., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

In the field of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), new strategies are needed to increase the rate of successful treatment discontinuations, a crucial goal in this disease. Anti-PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors are a promising therapeutic approach in CML after the demonstration of an increase of these inhibitory molecules in patients with CML. A phase Ib/II (NCT04793399, registration date March 11, 2021) open-label exploratory trial has been conducted to evaluate the safety of atezolizumab, a humanized anti-PD-L1 antibody, in combination with bosutinib in patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase CML. A total of 36 patients were planned to be enrolled, but the study had to be prematurely terminated due to safety concerns. Nine patients were included in the study, and only 8 went on to receive the combination with atezolizumab. There were a total of 44 adverse events (AEs) during the study period. The most frequent were gastrointestinal (50%), mostly mild (86% grade 1-2). The most serious AEs were hepatic. There were 17 hepatic AEs in 5 patients. Of the hepatic AEs 5 were during the bosutinib monotherapy phase and 12 during the combination phase (AST increase x4, ALT increase x4, blood bilirubin increase x1, alkaline phosphatase elevation x2, GGT increase x2), most of them grade 3-4. There were 2 patients who presented a dose-limiting toxicity; a grade 3 elevation of transaminases, that led to premature termination of the study. The combination of atezolizumab with bosutinib presents hepatotoxicity as a dose-limiting effect and therefore we do not recommend to explore this combination in future studies., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: To assess the safety and efficacy of the third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor osimertinib as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with surgically resectable stage I-IIIA EGFR -mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Patients and Methods: This was a multi-institutional phase II trial of neoadjuvant osimertinib for patients with surgically resectable stage I-IIIA (American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC] V7) EGFR -mutated (L858R or exon 19 deletion) NSCLC (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03433469). Patients received osimertinib 80 mg orally once daily for up to two 28-day cycles before surgical resection. The primary end point was major pathological response (MPR) rate. Secondary safety and efficacy end points were also assessed. Exploratory end points included pretreatment and post-treatment tumor mutation profiling., Results: A total of 27 patients were enrolled and treated with neoadjuvant osimertinib for a median 56 days before surgical resection. Twenty-four (89%) patients underwent subsequent surgery; three (11%) patients were converted to definitive chemoradiotherapy. The MPR rate was 14.8% (95% CI, 4.2 to 33.7). No pathological complete responses were observed. The ORR was 52%, and the median DFS was 40.9 months. One treatment-related serious adverse event (AE) occurred (3.7%). No patients were unable to undergo surgical resection or had surgery delayed because of an AE. The most common co-occurring tumor genomic alterations were in TP53 (42%) and RBM10 (21%)., Conclusion: Treatment with neoadjuvant osimertinib in surgically resectable (stage IA-IIIA, AJCC V7) EGFR -mutated NSCLC did not meet its primary end point for MPR rate. However, neoadjuvant osimertinib did not lead to unanticipated AEs, surgical delays, nor result in a significant unresectability rate.

Osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is the standard of care for patients with advanced NSCLC and EGFR-sensitizing mutations. Both in osimertinib pivotal trials and in the post-marketing phase, asymptomatic creatinine phosphokinase elevation and clinically relevant muscle damage have been reported. However, the mechanisms underlying these conditions remain unclear. Herein, we report the first muscle biopsy description of osimertinib-induced myopathy and hypothesize that the mechanisms underpinning muscle toxicity could be driven by hyporegenerative mechanisms and mitochondrial dysfunction with subsequent reduced metabolic endurance, both directly linked to the inhibition of downstream molecular pathways mediated by EGFR in muscle cells., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Bosutinib is a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), and for patients with Ph + chronic phase, accelerated phase, or blast phase CML resistant or intolerant to prior therapy. As is the case for all TKIs approved for treatment of CML, bosutinib is associated with adverse events (AEs) that require appropriate management to ensure adherence to treatment and optimized outcomes. The aim of this review is to provide physicians with updated practical information for the prevention and management of AEs occurring during treatment with bosutinib, including dosing strategies, based on the latest published evidence and clinical experience. Clinical studies and real-world evidence have shown bosutinib has a generally favorable safety profile, which has remained consistent across lines of therapy and in long-term reports. Adjusting the starting dose and/or modifying the dose during treatment with bosutinib are important strategies to manage AEs and improve tolerability, which are recognized within the label and in treatment guidelines. Dosing adjustment strategies to manage AEs are a recognized management approach for other TKIs in the treatment of CML and are not exclusive to bosutinib. In summary, long-term results from clinical trials and emerging real-world evidence demonstrate bosutinib has a safety profile that can largely be managed with treatment modifications and/or supportive care. Increased experience in managing toxicities and by using a personalized dosing approach may further improve adherence and outcomes with bosutinib., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Osimertinib is a recommended treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with an epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR ) mutation and as adjuvant treatment for resected EGFR -mutated NSCLC. EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors have shown preliminary efficacy in unresectable stage III EGFR -mutated NSCLC., Methods: In this phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned patients with unresectable EGFR -mutated stage III NSCLC without progression during or after chemoradiotherapy to receive osimertinib or placebo until disease progression occurred (as assessed by blinded independent central review) or the regimen was discontinued. The primary end point was progression-free survival as assessed by blinded independent central review., Results: A total of 216 patients who had undergone chemoradiotherapy were randomly assigned to receive osimertinib (143 patients) or placebo (73 patients). Osimertinib resulted in a significant progression-free survival benefit as compared with placebo: the median progression-free survival was 39.1 months with osimertinib versus 5.6 months with placebo, with a hazard ratio for disease progression or death of 0.16 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10 to 0.24; P<0.001). The percentage of patients who were alive and progression free at 12 months was 74% (95% CI, 65 to 80) with osimertinib and 22% (95% CI, 13 to 32) with placebo. Interim overall survival data (maturity, 20%) showed 36-month overall survival among 84% of patients with osimertinib (95% CI, 75 to 89) and 74% with placebo (95% CI, 57 to 85), with a hazard ratio for death of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.42 to 1.56; P = 0.53). The incidence of adverse events of grade 3 or higher was 35% in the osimertinib group and 12% in the placebo group; radiation pneumonitis (majority grade, 1 to 2) was reported in 48% and 38%, respectively. No new safety concerns emerged., Conclusions: Treatment with osimertinib resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival than placebo in patients with unresectable stage III EGFR -mutated NSCLC. (Funded by AstraZeneca; LAURA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03521154.)., (Copyright © 2024 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Purpose: Leptomeningeal metastases (LMs) exhibit a high incidence in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) post-treatment with first- or second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). This investigation evaluates the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of 80 mg once daily osimertinib in patients with LMs resistant to prior first- or second-generation EGFR TKIs., Materials and Methods: In this phase II multicenter, open-label, single-arm study, 80 mg osimertinib was administered to patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC who had developed LMs subsequent to treatment with prior EGFR TKIs. The primary end point was overall survival (OS), assessed alongside objective response rate by the blinded independent central review (BICR) and a pharmacokinetic analysis of plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) on the first day of cycles 3 and 6., Results: A total of 73 patients diagnosed with LM were treated with osimertinib, including 64 patients evaluable for the LM efficacy set-T790M negative (n = 62) and T790M positive (n = 2). The median OS in the full-analysis set was 15.6 months (95% CI, 11.5 to 20.2). The objective response rate for LM was 51.6%, including a 15.6% complete response, and the disease control rate was 81.3% by BICR in the LM efficacy evaluable set. The median LM progression-free survival by BICR was 11.2 months (95% CI, 7.7 to 15.3), the duration of response was 12.6 months (95% CI, 7.6 to 17.7), and OS was 15.0 months (95% CI, 11.3 to 18.7). Pharmacokinetic analysis showed that the CSF to free plasma osimertinib ratio was 22%. Most safety profiles were grade 1 and 2., Conclusion: The study demonstrates significant intracranial efficacy and survival benefits of 80 mg once daily osimertinib in NSCLC patients with LMs. The data support considering daily 80 mg of osimertinib as a treatment option for EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with LMs, irrespective of T790M mutation status.

Recent advancements in targeted therapies for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), specifically focusing on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, have revolutionized treatment strategies. Osimertinib, an approved therapy for metastatic NSCLC with EGFR mutations, highlights remarkable efficacy but also harbors the potential for severe adverse events, whose rarity or lack of precedence may mask their criticality. This article delves into the exploration of adverse events linked to osimertinib, shedding light on a rare yet life-threatening occurrence: severe myelosuppression. A case study detailing a patient with EGFR-mutated NSCLC exhibiting a robust treatment response but experiencing severe myelosuppression following osimertinib initiation is presented. Immediate discontinuation of osimertinib alongside concurrent blood transfusions facilitated toxicity recovery, prompting a successful reduction in myelosuppression severity upon re-administration at a lowered dosage.

Background: Patients with EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and MET amplification as a mechanism of resistance to first-line osimertinib have few treatment options. Here, we report the primary analysis of the phase 2 INSIGHT 2 study evaluating tepotinib, a highly selective MET inhibitor, combined with osimertinib in this population., Methods: This open-label, phase 2 study was conducted at 179 academic centres and community clinics in 17 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 and advanced or metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC of any histology, with MET amplification by tissue biopsy fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH; MET gene copy number of ≥5 or MET-to-CEP7 ratio of ≥2) or liquid biopsy next-generation sequencing (MET plasma gene copy number of ≥2·3), following progression on first-line osimertinib. Patients received oral tepotinib 500 mg plus oral osimertinib 80 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was independently assessed objective response in patients with MET amplification by central FISH treated with tepotinib plus osimertinib with at least 9 months of follow-up. Safety was analysed in patients who received at least one study drug dose. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03940703 (enrolment complete)., Findings: Between Feb 13, 2020, and Nov 4, 2022, 128 patients (74 [58%] female, 54 [42%] male) were enrolled and initiated tepotinib plus osimertinib. The primary activity analysis population included 98 patients with MET amplification confirmed by central FISH, previous first-line osimertinib and at least 9 months of follow-up (median 12·7 months [IQR 9·9-20·3]). The confirmed objective response rate was 50·0% (95% CI 39·7-60·3; 49 of 98 patients). The most common treatment-related grade 3 or worse adverse events were peripheral oedema (six [5%] of 128 patients), decreased appetite (five [4%]), prolonged electrocardiogram QT interval (five [4%]), and pneumonitis (four [3%]). Serious treatment-related adverse events were reported in 16 (13%) patients. Deaths of four (3%) patients were assessed as potentially related to either trial drug by the investigator due to pneumonitis (two [2%] patients), decreased platelet count (one [1%]), respiratory failure (one [1%]), and dyspnoea (one [1%]); one death was attributed to both pneumonitis and dyspnoea., Interpretation: Tepotinib plus osimertinib showed promising activity and acceptable safety in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC and MET amplification as a mechanism of resistance to first-line osimertinib, suggesting a potential chemotherapy-sparing oral targeted therapy option that should be further investigated., Funding: Merck (CrossRef Funder ID: 10.13039/100009945)., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests Y-LW reports receiving institute grants from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Pfizer; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, and Roche; and speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Hengrui, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi. VG reports receiving personal fees for advisory board membership from AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Exact Sciences, Gilead, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Olema Oncology; speaker fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Exact Sciences, Gilead, GSK, and Novartis; fees for expert testimony for Eli Lilly; and travel support from Gilead, AstraZeneca, and PharmaMar. PJV reports receiving personal fees for advisory board membership from Amgen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Ipsen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche. MWi reports receiving personal advisory board fees, consulting fees, speaker fees, and institute grants from AstraZeneca. CKL reports receiving research grants from AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim; honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Zuellig Pharma; travel support from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche; and personal fees for advisory board membership from AstraZeneca, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche. JM reports receiving advisory board fees from Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Novartis, Merck, Daiichi Sankyo, and MSD, and research funding to his institution from Roche, AstraZeneca, and Pierre Fabre. LMT reports receiving advisory board fees from AstraZeneca, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche; personal honoraria fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche; and travel support from AstraZeneca, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche. HH reports receiving honoraria fees from AstraZeneca, Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Sysmex Corporation, 3H Medi Solution, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Novartis, Merck Biopharma Co, Tokyo, Japan, an affiliate of Merck, Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo/UCB Japan, Takeda, and MSD; research funding from IQVIA, Syneos Health Clinical, EPS Corporation, Nippon Kayaku, Takeda, MSD, Amgen, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, CMIC, Pfizer R&D, LabCorp, Kobayashi Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Eisai, EP-CRSU, Shionogi & Co, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, GSK, Sanofi, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Boehringer Ingelheim, SRL Medisearch, PRA Health Sciences, Astellas Pharma, Ascent Development Services, and Bayer; and financial support for the present manuscript from Guardant Health. PLC reports receiving advisory board fees from AstraZeneca, Merck, and Pfizer, and honoraria fees from AstraZeneca. JR reports receiving personal honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, speaker fees (to their institution) from Merck, and advisory board fees (to their institution) from Merck. GF reports receiving personal fees for speaker engagements with AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, and MSD, and travel support from Roche. TK reports receiving honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Taiho, and Takeda; receiving research funding for their institution from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, BluePrint, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Haihe Biopharma, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Takeda, and TurningPoint; receiving advisory board fees from AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, Merck, MSD, Novartis, and Pfizer; and their spouse as an employee of Eli Lilly. EN reports receiving research funding from Roche, Pfizer, EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Billerica, MA, USA, an affiliate of Merck, and Bristol Myers Squibb; consulting fees from Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Billerica, MA, USA, an affiliate of Merck, Sanofi, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Amgen, Janssen, Daiichi Sankyo, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Takeda, Sanofi, Janssen, Pierre Fabre, Qiagen, and Bayer; personal honoraria for lectures from Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Sanofi, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Amgen, Janssen, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Takeda, Sanofi, Janssen, Qiagen, Mirati, and Bayer; travel support from Takeda, MSD, AstraZeneca, and Roche; and fees for participation in data safety meetings from Apollomics. HSH reports receiving research grants for their institution from AstraZeneca, Merck, Janssen, Novartis, and Boehringer Ingelheim; honoraria and fees for lectures and advisory board meetings from AstraZeneca, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Janssen; and travel support from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche. EFS reports receiving advisory or consultancy fees to their institution from Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, MSD, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Takeda, and Daiichi Sankyo; personal speaker fees from Boehringer Ingelheim; and advisory board fees from Merck and Daiichi Sankyo. MWe reports holding a consulting or advisory role for Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, ISA Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Immatics, Bayer, and ImCheck therapeutics; honoraria fees from Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, SYNLAB, Janssen, EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Billerica, MA, USA, an affiliate of Merck, GWT, Amgen, and Novartis; travel support from Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Amgen, GEMoaB, Sanofi/Aventis, Immatics, and EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Billerica, MA, USA, an affiliate of Merck; and research funding to his institution from Roche. DT reports receiving consulting fees for their institution from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, DKSH, GSK, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, and Takeda; research funding from ACM Biolabs, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, and Pfizer; and speaker fees for their institution from Amgen, Bayer, Merck, Pfizer, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, and Takeda. MM reports receiving research funding from Boehringer Ingelheim and Eli Lilly; personal honoraria fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Chugai Pharmaceutical, MSD, Ono Pharmaceutical, and Taiho Pharmaceutical; and other clinical trial support from Chugai Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Billerica, MA, USA, an affiliate of Merck, Kissei, Taiho, and Novartis. AO’B, SA, BMP, CS, DJ, RS, BE-L, and NK report being employees of Merck. KB reports being an employee of Merck at the time of the study and manuscript preparation. KG reports being an employee of EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Billerica, MA, USA, an affiliate of Merck. XL reports receiving consulting fees from EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Billerica, MA, USA, an affiliate of Merck, AstraZeneca, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Hengrui Therapeutics, Janssen Oncology, Daiichi Sankyo, Blueprint Medicines, Sensei Biotherapeutics, AbbVie, Arrivent, and Regeneron; travel support from Spectrum Pharmaceuticals and EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Billerica, MA, USA, an affiliate of Merck, and research funding to their institution from Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Billerica, MA, USA, an affiliate of Merck, and Regeneron. TMK reports receiving grants for their institution from AstraZeneca; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Janssen, Regeneron, Samsung Bioepis, Takeda, and Yuhan; honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca, IMBDx, Janssen, Takeda, and Yuhan; advisory board fees from AstraZeneca, Janssen, Regeneron, and Takeda; and clinical trial funding to their institution from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca/Medimmune, Bayer, Black Diamond Therapeutics, Blueprint Medicines, Boryung, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Dizal, EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Billerica, MA, USA, an affiliate of Merck, Roche/Genentech, Hanmi, Genmab, Janssen, Novartis, RAPT Therapeutics, Regeneron, Sanofi, Takeda, and Yuhan. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Background: Long QT syndrome (LQTS) has been reported in older patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following the use of osimertinib, the third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI). However, there have not been analytic epidemiology studies on this topic. We aimed to compare the risk of LQTS between osimertinib and first/second-generation EGFR-TKIs in older patients with advanced NSCLC., Research Design and Methods: This retrospective observational study used the 2006-2019 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data and included older patients with advanced NSCLC who were treated with either osimertinib or first/second-generation EGFR-TKIs during 2007-2017. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance the two groups with propensity scores estimated based on the patients' socioeconomic and clinical characteristics. Crude incidence rate (IR) and adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of the primary outcome, incident LQTS, were estimated., Results: A total of 545 and 1,135 patients were included in the osimertinib and first/second-generation EGFR-TKI groups, which increased to 1,614 and 1,659, respectively, after IPTW. The osimertinib group had a higher IR of LQTS (2.62 per 100 person-years, 95% CI 2.03-3.38) compared to the first/second-generation EGFR-TKI group (1.33 per 100 person-years, 95% CI 0.92-1.92). After adjusting for covariates, the osimertinib group had a higher risk of LQTS than the first/second-generation EGFR-TKI group, with an HR of 1.94 (95% CI 1.23-3.08). The increased LQTS risk in the osimertinib group was even higher in females, whites and patients aged ≥ 75., Conclusions: Given the elevated risk of LQTS associated with osimertinib user, close monitoring for cardiac rhythm irregularities of high-risk patients following initiation of EGFR-TKI is recommended.

Osimertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), is routinely prescribed as first-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer, regardless of the presence of the T790M resistance mutation. This study reports a rare case of Factor V inhibitor detection during osimertinib therapy in a patient with lung adenocarcinoma. These findings underscore the importance of vigilant monitoring for coagulation abnormalities during EGFR-TKI therapy., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Methaemoglobinaemia and a Heinz-body haemolytic anaemia are uncommon but potentially treatable complications of aniline poisoning. Management of aniline poisoning is mainly removing the source of aniline exposure and management of methaemoglobinaemia. Management of methaemoglobinaemia is guided by blood methaemoglobin levels and patient symptoms. Blood methaemoglobin level <30% requires only supplemental oxygen while for methaemoglobin level >30%, intravenous methylene blue is the mainstay of treatment. All patients treated with methylene blue should be observed for delayed haemolysis, acute renal failure and cardiac complications. In patients with contraindication to methylene blue, exchange transfusion can be used while haemodialysis is reserved for complicated cases. We successfully managed 6 patients of methaemoglobinaemia due to aniline poisoning by methylene blue. Two of these patients who developed Heinz-body haemolytic anaemia with acute renal failure as a complication also required exchange transfusion.

This case report features a 62-year-old male with stage IB lung adenocarcinoma harboring an epidermal growth factor receptor exon 19 deletion, who underwent treatment with osimertinib following a left upper lobectomy and lymph node dissection. Despite a history of smoking and well-managed type 2 diabetes, the patient developed heart failure 18 months post-initiation of osimertinib therapy, marking one of the latest occurrences of heart failure following osimertinib treatment documented in limited literature. Cardiac MRI revealed significant left ventricular enlargement, lateral wall myocardial thinning, and localized myocardial fibrosis without perfusion defects, a finding not previously reported in literature. This case underscores the severe and unusual cardiac effects of osimertinib in patients with latent risk factors, highlighting the importance of vigilant cardiac monitoring and a multidisciplinary management approach., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Osimertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has been recommended as a first-line treatment of EGFR-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Skin rash is one of the most common side effects of osimertinib, and can have an impact on patients' quality of life and follow-up. However, there are few reports on the safety and efficacy of switching therapy with osimertinib and the other three generations of TKIs. In this paper, we present a case of NSCLC with an EGFR exon 19 deletion (19del) and MET gene amplification who developed a severe rash after 2 months of treatment with osimertinib that did not recur after switching to replacement therapy with aumonertinib. Our findings indicate that aumonertinib is as effective as osimertinib in treating EGFR19del, while also exhibiting a lower occurrence of adverse skin reactions. This may result in an improved quality of life for patients.

A 71-year-old woman was treated with osimertinib for stage IV adenocarcinoma with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. Treatment led to improvements in the primary tumor, multiple lung metastases, and multiple bone metastases. However, nine months later, she presented with marked liver dysfunction and jaundice. Chest and abdominal computed tomography did not show abnormal findings in the liver parenchyma or biliary system. However, blood tests were positive for hepatitis B surface antigen and hepatitis B virus DNA, suggesting hepatitis B virus reactivation. The patient died of liver failure despite treatment with steroids and antiviral drugs.

Objective: We analyze and identify the signals of gender differences in adverse events (ADEs) related to Osimertinib and provide reference for clinical implementation of individualized drug use., Methods: ADE reports of Osimertinib received from FAERS database from the first quarter of 2016 to the fourth quarter of 2022 were extracted. Reporting odds ratio (ROR) data analysis strategy was used for mining of signal strength that represents gender differences in ADEs related to Osimertinib., Results: The number of Osimertinib ADE reports included in the analysis was 7968 in females and 7570 in males, respectively. According to ROR, men were more likely to develop pneumonia aspiration, lung infection, interstitial lung disease, pulmonary toxicity, dyspnea, ventricular extrasystoles, and pulmonary thrombosis, while women were more likely to develop cardiac failure congestive, stomatitis, diarrhea, muscle spasms, nail disorder, onycholysis, skin disorder, dry skin, and rash., Conclusion: Gender differences existed in ADE signals related to Osimertinib. The higher risk of ADEs in male patients was lung diseases that seem more serious than those nail toxicities or skin problems that occurred in female patients. In order to ensure the safety of medication, we should be alert to the differences between different genders and take corresponding preventive measures to reduce the occurrence of serious ADEs.

Osimertinib is used as the first-line therapy for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, early dose reduction is often required due to adverse events (AEs). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of early dose reduction of osimertinib on efficacy and safety. This was a retrospective study including patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC who were started on osimertinib as the first-line therapy between August 2018 and December 2021. Patients whose doses were reduced to less than 80 mg/day within 6 months of osimertinib initiation or started at 40 mg/day were defined as the dose reduction group. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Factors affecting PFS were explored using the Cox proportional hazards model. A total of 85 patients were included in this study. No significant differences in patient characteristics were observed between the dose reduction (n = 25) and standard dose groups (n = 60). The median PFS in the dose reduction group was significantly prolonged compared with that in the standard dose group (26.0 months vs. 12.0 months, p = 0.03). Multivariable analysis of 84 patients, excluding a patient with unknown brain metastasis, revealed that EGFR exon 21 L858R mutation, malignant pleural effusion or pleural metastasis, liver metastasis, and dose reduction within 6 months were independent factors affecting PFS. Early dose reduction of osimertinib is an effective therapeutic strategy for prolonging PFS in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Dasatinib is one of the second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) which is approved for the treatment of patients with chronic phase CML (CP-CML) both in the front line and in the second line setting. Pleural effusion (PE) is a unique toxicity associated with dasatinib use. Our aim was to study the incidence of pleural effusion in our cohort of patients who were treated with dasatinib for CP-CML and the safety upon TKI switch. A total of 390 patients were treated with dasatinib during their course of treatment for CP-CML. A total of 69 patients (17.6%) developed any grade of PE. About 33 (48%) patients developed CTCAE grade 2 PE, 34 (49%) grade 3 and only 1 patient developed grade 4 PE. Recurrence of PE was observed in 34 (49%) patients. While only 12 patients (17.3%) continued using dasatinib after development of PE, dasatinib was discontinued in the other 57 patients. Therapy was switched to bosutinib in 13 patients out of which 6 (46%) patients re-developed PE. While only 12.5% patients developed re-accumulation of pleural fluid in patients switched to imatinib, none of the patients switched to nilotinib re-developed PE. A change in TKI to bosutinib was associated with a 46% risk of recurrence of PE in patients who develop PE on dasatinib for the treatment of CP-CML. The incidence of recurrent PE was markedly lower in patient switched to imatinib or nilotinib., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Azacitidine plus venetoclax is a standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed AML who are unfit for intensive chemotherapy. However, FLT3 mutations are a common mechanism of resistance to this regimen. The addition of gilteritinib, an oral FLT3 inhibitor, to azacitidine and venetoclax may improve outcomes in patients with FLT3 -mutated AML., Methods: This phase I/II study evaluated azacitidine, venetoclax, and gilteritinib in two cohorts: patients with (1) newly diagnosed FLT3 -mutated AML who were unfit for intensive chemotherapy or (2) relapsed/refractory FLT3 -mutated AML (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04140487). The primary end points were the maximum tolerated dose of gilteritinib (phase I) and the combined complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) rate (phase II)., Results: Fifty-two patients were enrolled (frontline [n = 30]; relapsed/refractory [n = 22]). The recommended phase II dose was gilteritinib 80 mg once daily in combination with azacitidine and venetoclax. In the frontline cohort, the median age was 71 years and 73% of patients had an FLT3 -internal tandem duplication (ITD) mutation. The CR/CRi rate was 96% (CR, 90%; CRi, 6%). Sixty-five percent of evaluable patients achieved FLT3 -ITD measurable residual disease <5 × 10 -5 within four cycles. With a median follow-up of 19.3 months, the median relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) have not been reached and the 18-month RFS and OS rates are 71% and 72%, respectively. In the relapsed/refractory cohort, the CR/CRi rate was 27%; nine additional patients (41%) achieved a morphologic leukemia-free state. The most common grade 3 or higher nonhematologic adverse events were infection (62%) and febrile neutropenia (38%), which were more frequent in the relapsed/refractory cohort., Conclusion: The combination of azacitidine, venetoclax, and gilteritinib resulted in high rates of CR/CRi, deep FLT3 molecular responses, and encouraging survival in newly diagnosed FLT3 -mutated AML. Myelosuppression was manageable with mitigative dosing strategies.

Background: Although osimertinib is a promising therapeutic agent for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive lung cancer, the incidence of pneumonitis is particularly high among Japanese patients receiving the drug. Furthermore, the safety and efficacy of subsequent anticancer treatments, including EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) rechallenge, which are to be administered after pneumonitis recovery, remain unclear., Objective: This study investigated the safety of EGFR-TKI rechallenge in patients who experienced first-line osimertinib-induced pneumonitis, with a primary focus on recurrent pneumonitis., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients with EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer who developed initial pneumonitis following first-line osimertinib treatment across 34 institutions in Japan between August 2018 and September 2020., Results: Among the 124 patients included, 68 (54.8%) patients underwent EGFR-TKI rechallenge. The recurrence rate of pneumonitis following EGFR-TKI rechallenge was 27% (95% confidence interval [CI] 17-39) at 12 months. The cumulative incidence of recurrent pneumonitis was significantly higher in the osimertinib group than in the first- and second-generation EGFR-TKI (conventional EGFR-TKI) groups (hazard ratio [HR] 3.1; 95% CI 1.3-7.5; p = 0.013). Multivariate analysis revealed a significant association between EGFR-TKI type (osimertinib or conventional EGFR-TKI) and pneumonitis recurrence, regardless of severity or status of initial pneumonitis (HR 3.29; 95% CI 1.12-9.68; p = 0.03)., Conclusions: Osimertinib rechallenge after initial pneumonitis was associated with significantly higher recurrence rates than conventional EGFR-TKI rechallenge., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: MEK inhibitors (MEKi) lack monotherapy efficacy in most RAS-mutant cancers. BCL-xL is an anti-apoptotic protein identified by a synthetic lethal shRNA screen as a key suppressor of apoptotic response to MEKi., Patients and Methods: We conducted a dose escalation study (NCT02079740) of the BCL-xL inhibitor navitoclax and MEKi trametinib in patients with RAS-mutant tumors with expansion cohorts for: pancreatic, gynecologic (GYN), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and other cancers harboring KRAS/NRAS mutations. Paired pretreatment and day 15 tumor biopsies and serial cell-free (cf)DNA were analyzed., Results: A total of 91 patients initiated treatment, with 38 in dose escalation. Fifty-eight percent had ≥3 prior therapies. A total of 15 patients (17%) had colorectal cancer, 19 (11%) pancreatic, 15 (17%) NSCLC, and 32 (35%) GYN cancers. The recommended phase II dose (RP2D) was established as trametinib 2 mg daily days 1 to 14 and navitoclax 250 mg daily days 1 to 28 of each cycle. Most common adverse events included diarrhea, thrombocytopenia, increased AST/ALT, and acneiform rash. At RP2D, 8 of 49 (16%) evaluable patients achieved partial response (PR). Disease-specific differences in efficacy were noted. In patients with GYN at the RP2D, 7 of 21 (33%) achieved a PR and median duration of response 8.2 months. No PRs occurred in patients with colorectal cancer, NSCLC, or pancreatic cancer. MAPK pathway inhibition was observed in on-treatment tumor biopsies. Reductions in KRAS/NRAS mutation levels in cfDNA correlated with clinical benefit., Conclusions: Navitoclax in combination with trametinib was tolerable. Durable clinical responses were observed in patients with RAS-mutant GYN cancers, warranting further evaluation in this population., (©2024 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Objectives: Osimertinib is largely used as first-line therapy for metastatic epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant lung cancers based on the FLAURA clinical trial. Real-world patient outcomes often differ from clinical trial outcomes. This study evaluated the efficacy of first-line osimertinib in patients treated in British Columbia (BC), Canada. Furthermore, we compared the outcomes of patients who would and would not have been eligible for the original FLAURA trial., Methods: Consecutive patients receiving first-line osimertinib for metastatic EGFR exon19 or L858R lung cancer were identified using the BC Cancer Pharmacy Database. Patient eligibility for the FLAURA clinical trial were retrospectively reviewed based on the following criteria: ECOG ≥ 2, symptomatic brain metastases or on steroids, hemoglobin < 90 g/L, platelets < 100x10 9 /L, or a creatinine clearance < 50 mL/min. mOS was assessed for the entire population and compared between patients who would have been eligible and ineligible for FLAURA., Results: From January 2020 to October 2021, 311 patients received first-line osimertinib; 44 % (137/311) were deemed FLAURA ineligible, predominantly due to low ECOG (n = 120). After a median follow-up of 26.5 months, the mOS for the entire cohort was 27.4 months (95 %CI 23.8-30.1). The mOS for ineligible patients was 18 months shorter than eligible patients (15.8 vs 34.2, p < 0.001). Ineligible patients had higher rates of de novo stage IV disease, higher rates of stage IVB disease, and more sites of disease than eligible patients., Conclusion: In this real-world population, nearly half of patients would have been ineligible for FLAURA. The mOS was one year shorter than reported in FLAURA. However, patients who would have been eligible for the FLAURA clinical trial had similar OS to patients enrolled in FLAURA. Trial ineligible patients had a higher burden of disease at baseline which may have led to inferior outcomes. Further research is needed to improve outcomes in these patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest JC Wells, M Mullin, and S Sun have no COIs to report. C Ho has received: Grants/Research funding - Astra Zeneca, Roche. Honoraria - Abbvie, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, BMS, CADTH, Eisai, Jazz, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi. B Melosky has received speaker honoraria or attended advisory boards for Astra Zeneca, BMS, Merck, Roche, Pfizer, Takeda, Sanofi, EMD Serono, and Janssen J Laskin has received honoraria from Roche, Pfizer, Takeda and Lilly; she has also received research funding to her institution from Roche., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Bosutinib (BOSULIF ® ), an orally administered BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) developed by Pfizer Inc., is well established in the EU and the USA as a treatment for adults with newly diagnosed (ND) chronic phase (CP) Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), and for CP, accelerated phase and blast phase Ph+ CML that is resistant or intolerant (R/I) to prior therapy. In September 2023, based on clinical data from patients aged ≥ 1 to < 18 years, bosutinib was approved in the USA for the treatment of pediatric patients aged ≥ 1 year with CP Ph+ CML that is ND or R/I to prior therapy. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of bosutinib leading to this first pediatric approval., (© 2023. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Purpose: Bosutinib is approved for adults with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML): 400 mg once daily in newly diagnosed (ND); 500 mg once daily in resistant/intolerant (R/I) patients. Bosutinib has a different tolerability profile than other tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and potentially less impact on growth (preclinical data). The primary objective of this first-in-child trial was to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) for pediatric R/I and ND patients., Patients and Methods: In the phase I part of this international, open-label trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04258943), children age 1-18 years with R/I (per European LeukemiaNet 2013) Ph+ CML were enrolled using a 6 + 4 design, testing 300, 350, and 400 mg/m 2 once daily with food. The RP2D was the dose resulting in 0/6 or 1/10 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) during the first cycle and achieving adult target AUC levels for the respective indication. As ND participants were only enrolled in phase II, the ND RP2D was selected based on data from R/I patients., Results: Thirty patients were enrolled; 27 were evaluable for DLT: six at 300 mg/m 2 , 11 at 350 mg/m 2 (one DLT), and 10 at 400 mg/m 2 (one DLT). The mean AUCs at 300 mg/m 2 , 350 mg/m 2 , and 400 mg/m 2 were 2.20 μg h/mL, 2.52 μg h/mL, and 2.66 μg h/mL, respectively. The most common adverse event was diarrhea (93%; ≥grade 3: 11%). Seven patients stopped because of intolerance and eight because of insufficient response. Complete cytogenetic and major molecular response to bosutinib appeared comparable with other published phase I/II trials with second-generation TKIs in children., Conclusion: Bosutinib was safe and effective. The pediatric RP2D was 400 mg/m 2 once daily (max 600 mg/d) with food in R/I patients and 300 mg/m 2 once daily (max 500 mg/d) with food in ND patients, which achieved targeted exposures as per adult experience.

Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.

Rationale: Osimertinib is the third-generation, pyrimidine-based, irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor that received approval from the FDA in November 2015 and has become the standard approach in patients with advanced, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), especially with brain metastases. Osimertinib is beneficial in terms of progression-free and overall survival in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC. However, the rarity of bilateral pneumothorax among adverse events necessitates further research on its potential fatality rate., Patient Concerns: A 72-year-old man diagnosed with stage IV (T2NxM1) NSCLC with the 21L858R mutation of the EGFR gene received osimertinib treatment. Unfortunately, 10 weeks after osimertinib treatment, the patient developed severe interstitial lung disease and pneumothorax. Thus, osimertinib treatment was discontinued, and prednisolone (160 mg/day) and supportive treatment were administered., Diagnoses: Osimertinib-induced severe interstitial lung disease and pneumothorax., Interventions: Osimertinib treatment was discontinued, and prednisolone (160 mg/day) and supportive treatment were administered., Outcomes: The bilateral pneumothorax was difficult to correct and the patient eventually died., Lessons: Osimertinib-induced pneumothorax occurred approximately 10 weeks after receiving the drug and had severe cough and chest tightness as initial symptoms. In addition, the incidence of drug-induced pneumothorax increases in patients treated with osimertinib when combined with underlying respiratory diseases., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: Preclinical Alzheimer's disease is increasingly studied in clinical trials. Although safety signals are routinely monitored in clinical trial populations with Alzheimer's disease, it can be challenging to identify new safety signals against background rates of age-related medical comorbidities., Objectives: To report detailed safety data from a cognitively unimpaired older population with evidence of elevated cerebral amyloid levels on amyloid positron emission tomography in the placebo arm of a Phase 3 clinical trial., Design: Phase 3, 4.5-year, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial., Setting: Placebo data from the Anti-Amyloid Treatment in Asymptomatic Alzheimer's Disease (A4) study., Participants: Enrolled participants were aged 65-85 years with a global Clinical Dementia Rating score of 0, a Mini-Mental State Examination score of 25-30, a Wechsler Memory Scale Logical Memory IIa (delayed recall) score of 6-18, and elevated brain amyloid levels on 18F-florbetapir positron emission tomography., Measurements: Study participants who received placebo were followed up with post-baseline safety measures. Assessments included review of concomitant medication and adverse events, the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale, electrocardiograms, and neuroimaging (brain magnetic resonance imaging)., Results: In total, 591 study participants (mean age [standard deviation] 71.9 [5.0] years) were assigned to and received placebo in the A4 study, and were followed up to 240 weeks. Participants were primarily White (93.9%) and from the United States (86.8%); 60.4% were women. The most common serious adverse events (incidence rate per 100 person-years) were pneumonia (incidence rate=0.4; 95% confidence interval=0.2-0.7) and atrial fibrillation (incidence rate=0.4; 95% confidence interval=0.2-0.7). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were upper respiratory tract infection (incidence rate=10.9; 95% confidence interval=9.4-12.5), fall (incidence rate=7.7; 95% confidence interval=6.6-9.0), and nasopharyngitis (incidence rate=5.8; 95% confidence interval=4.8-6.9). The most common ischemia-related findings on magnetic resonance imaging were subcortical infarction (incidence rate=1.4; 95% confidence interval=1.0-2.0) and acute ischemia (incidence rate=0.6; 95% confidence interval=0.3-1.0). Emergent amyloid-related imaging abnormalities with hemosiderin deposition occurred in 32.8% of participants who received placebo; the primary factor associated with these events during the post-baseline period was the number of microhemorrhages at baseline (odds ratio=349.9; 95% confidence interval=247.6-494.4; adjusted p<0.001)., Conclusion: Safety findings in the placebo-treated group from the A4 study provide a robust characterization of expected safety in a clinical trial population with preclinical Alzheimer's disease. These results may provide context in planning future studies and safety evaluations during ongoing blinded studies in preclinical Alzheimer's disease., Competing Interests: Roy Yaari, Karen C. Holdridge, Michele Mancini, Michael Case, Chakib Battioui, and John R. Sims are full-time employees of Eli Lilly and Company and are minority holders of company stock. Roy Yaari and Karen C. Holdridge have received support for attending meetings and/or travel from Eli Lilly and Company. Michael S. Rafii has received grants from Esai and Eli Lilly and Company; has received consulting fees from AC Immune and Ionis; and has participated in data safety monitoring boards or advisory boards for Alzheon, Aptah Bio, Biohaven, Keystone Bio, Prescient Imaging, Positrigo, and Embic. Paul S. Aisen has received grants from Eisai, Eli Lilly and Company, the National Institutes of Health, and Alzheimer’s Association; and has received consulting fees from Merck, Biogen, Abbvie, Genentech, Roche, ImmunoBrain Checkpoint, and Arrowhead. Reisa A. Sperling has received grants from NIA, GHR Foundation, Alzheimer’s Association, and Eisai; and has received consulting fees from AC Immune, Acumen, Alnylam, AbbVie, Genentech, Janssen, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Merck, Prothena, Shionogi, Alector, Ionis, Vaxxinity, and Roche.

Background: The most recommended treatment for stage IV EGFR-positive lung cancer is osimertinib monotherapy. The dosage of osimertinib is fixed at 80 mg/day regardless of body surface area (BSA), however some patients withdraw or reduce the dosage due to adverse events (AEs)., Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 98 patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), who received 80 mg osimertinib as the initial treatment. We investigated the impact of BSA on efficacy and safety of osimertinib., Results: The cut-off value of BSA was estimated using the receiver operating characteristics curve, and was determined to be 1.5 m 2 . There were 44 patients in the BSA < 1.5 group and 54 patients in the BSA ≥ 1.5 group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of AEs (hematologic toxicity of ≥grade 3 or higher, and non-hematologic toxicity of ≥grade 3) between the two groups. However, the incidence of dose reduction due to AEs was significantly higher in the BSA < 1.5 group compared with the BSA ≥ 1.5 group (16 patients vs 5 patients, p = 0.003). The main reasons were fatigue, anorexia, diarrhea, and liver disfunction. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not significantly different (16.9 months in the BSA < 1.5 group vs 18.1 months in the BSA ≥ 1.5 group, p = 0.869)., Conclusion: Differences in BSA affected the optimal dose of osimertinib. However, the PFS with osimertinib treatment was not affected by BSA. Therefore, when using osimertinib as an initial treatment for patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC, dose reduction to control AEs should be considered, especially in the BSA<1.5 group., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Motohiro Tamiya has received lecture fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Asahi Kasei Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Bayer, Amgen, Kyowa-Kirin, and Nippon Kayaku. Kei Kunimasa has received lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharma and Novartis. Kazumi Nishino has received lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Roche Diagnostics, Novartis, Pfizer, Merk, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Bristol Myers Squibb, and Nippon Kayaku. Mari Takagi has received lecture fees from Eli Lilly, Yakult, Terumo, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Towa Pharmaceutical, Daiichi-Sankyo, Becton Dickinson and Company, MSD, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Nippon Kayaku, AstraZeneca, Sando, and Ono Pharmaceutical. Other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

The treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia relies on orally available tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting the BCR::ABL1 oncoprotein. Bosutinib is a second generation adenosine triphosphate-competitive inhibitor approved for use in frontline adult chronic phase-chronic myeloid leukemia and all phases-chronic myeloid leukemia in the second line setting or beyond. Its efficacy was demonstrated in several pivotal clinical trials at 400mg once daily in the first line context and at 500mg once daily beyond first line. Bosutinib-related adverse events frequently occur early after treatment initiation and include gastro-intestinal symptoms and cytolytic hepatitis. These drug-related adverse events must be properly managed in order to preserve safety, efficacy and treatment acceptability. The French chronic myeloid leukemia study group gathered a panel of experts in hematology, pharmacology and hepatology in order to elaborate practical recommendations on the management of bosutinib treatment. These recommendations aim at optimizing the short and long-term tolerance and benefit/risk balance of bosutinib, mainly focusing at gastro-intestinal and liver toxicities., (Copyright © 2023 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Previous studies have identified an interaction between protein kinase inhibitors (PKIs) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in patients with lung cancer. This type of interaction may reduce the efficacy of PKIs. However, the effect of PKI-PPI interaction on patient mortality remains controversial. This study set out to determine the impact of PKI-PPI interaction on overall survival for lung cancer patients., Materials and Methods: This study was conducted using data from the French National Health Care Database from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2021. We identified patients with: (i) an age equal to or greater than 18 years; (ii) lung cancer; and (iii) at least one reimbursement for one of the following drugs: erlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib and osimertinib. Patients were followed-up between the first date of PKI reimbursement and either December 31, 2021 or if they died, the date on which death occurred. The cumulative exposure to PPI duration during PKI treatment was calculated as the ratio between the number of concomitant exposure days to PKI and PPI and the number of exposure days to PKI. A survival analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model was then performed to assess the risk of death following exposure to a PKI-PPI interaction., Results: 34,048 patients received at least one reimbursement for PKIs of interest in our study: 26,133 (76.8 %) were exposed to erlotinib; 3,142 (9.2 %) to gefitinib; 1,417 (4.2 %) to afatinib; and 3,356 (9.9 %) to osimertinib. Patients with concomitant exposure to PKI-PPI interaction during 20 % or more of the PKI treatment period demonstrated an increased risk of death (HR, 1.60 [95 % CI, 1.57-1.64]) compared to other patients. When this cut-off varied from 10 % to 80 %, the estimated HR ranged from 1.46 [95 % CI, 1.43-1.50] to 2.19 [95 % CI, 2.12-2.25]., Discussion/conclusion: In our study, an elevated risk of death was observed in patients exposed to PKI-PPI interaction. Finally, we were able to identify a dose-dependent effect for this interaction. This deleterious effect of osimertinib and PPI was revealed for the first time in real life conditions., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: Osimertinib is a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) that is selective for EGFR-TKI-sensitizing and EGFR T790M resistance mutations. Evidence suggests that the addition of chemotherapy may extend the benefits of EGFR-TKI therapy., Methods: In this phase 3, international, open-label trial, we randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio patients with EGFR -mutated (exon 19 deletion or L858R mutation) advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had not previously received treatment for advanced disease to receive osimertinib (80 mg once daily) with chemotherapy (pemetrexed [500 mg per square meter of body-surface area] plus either cisplatin [75 mg per square meter] or carboplatin [pharmacologically guided dose]) or to receive osimertinib monotherapy (80 mg once daily). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Response and safety were also assessed., Results: A total of 557 patients underwent randomization. Investigator-assessed progression-free survival was significantly longer in the osimertinib-chemotherapy group than in the osimertinib group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49 to 0.79; P<0.001). At 24 months, 57% (95% CI, 50 to 63) of the patients in the osimertinib-chemotherapy group and 41% (95% CI, 35 to 47) of those in the osimertinib group were alive and progression-free. Progression-free survival as assessed according to blinded independent central review was consistent with the primary analysis (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.80). An objective (complete or partial) response was observed in 83% of the patients in the osimertinib-chemotherapy group and in 76% of those in the osimertinib group; the median response duration was 24.0 months (95% CI, 20.9 to 27.8) and 15.3 months (95% CI, 12.7 to 19.4), respectively. The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events from any cause was higher with the combination than with monotherapy - a finding driven by known chemotherapy-related adverse events. The safety profile of osimertinib plus pemetrexed and a platinum-based agent was consistent with the established profiles of the individual agents., Conclusions: First-line treatment with osimertinib-chemotherapy led to significantly longer progression-free survival than osimertinib monotherapy among patients with EGFR -mutated advanced NSCLC. (Funded by AstraZeneca; FLAURA2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04035486.)., (Copyright © 2023 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis is associated with end-organ damage resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Most recently, avacopan, an orally administered selective antagonist of the C5a receptor, was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration as an adjunctive treatment of adult patients with severe, active ANCA-associated vasculitis (granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis) in combination with standard therapy including glucocorticoids. This case study describes a 58-year-old Asian female with severe ANCA-associated vasculitis and acute renal failure who responded to adjunctive therapy with avacopan despite being refractory to rituximab and glucocorticoid therapy., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

The approved dose of bosutinib in chronic phase CML is 400 mg QD in first-line and 500 mg QD in later-line treatment. However, given that gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity typically occurs early after treatment initiation, physicians often tend to start therapy with lower doses although this has never been tested systematically in prospective trials in the Western world. The Bosutinib Dose Optimization (BODO) Study, a multicenter phase II study, investigated the tolerability and efficacy of a step-in dosing concept of bosutinib (starting at 300 mg QD) in chronic phase CML patients in 2 nd or 3 rd line who were intolerant and/or refractory to previous TKI treatment. Of 57 patients included until premature closure of the study due to slow recruitment, 34 (60%) reached the targeted dose level of 500 mg QD following the 2-weekly step-in dosing regimen. While the dosing-in concept failed to reduce GI toxicity (grade II-IV, primary study endpoint) to < 40% (overall rate of 60%; 95% CI: 45-74%), bosutinib treatment (mean dosage: 403 mg/day) showed remarkable efficacy with a cumulative major molecular remission (MMR) rate of 79% (95% CI: 66 to 88%) at month 24. Of thirty patients refractory to previous therapy and not in MMR at baseline, 19 (64%) achieved an MMR during treatment. GI toxicity did not significantly impact on patient-reported outcomes (PRO) and led to treatment discontinuation in only one patient. Overall, the results of our trial support the efficacy and safety of bosutinib after failure of second-generation TKI pre-treatment. Trial registration: NCT02577926., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common histological subtype of lung cancer. Osimertinib has been recommended as first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC with EGFR mutations. Previous studies have only reported cases of gastrointestinal bleeding due to Erlotinib and gefitinib, but to date, always no cases of gastrointestinal bleeding due to Osimertinib have been reported., Case Report: We report a case of a female patient with NSCLC with EFGR mutation. After 1.5 years of treatment with Osimertinib, a colonoscopy showed diffuse congestion of the colonic mucosa., Management and Outcome: The patient's symptoms of blood in the stool disappeared, after stopping Osimertinib and giving mucosal protection treatment for 1 week., Discussion: Osimertinib may have contributed to gastrointestinal bleeding because no recurrent bleeding was observed after discontinuation of treatment. Physicians and patients should be aware that osimertinib may increase the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Introduction: In ADAURA, adjuvant osimertinib significantly improved disease-free survival versus placebo in resected stage IB to IIIA EGFR-mutated NSCLC. We report in-depth analyses of three-year safety, tolerability, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) from ADAURA., Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1 to osimertinib 80 mg or placebo once daily for up to 3 years. Safety assessments were performed at baseline, week 2, week 4, week 12, and every 12 weeks until treatment completion or discontinuation, and 28 days after treatment was stopped. The SF-36 survey measured HRQoL at baseline, week 12, week 24, and every 24 weeks until recurrence, treatment completion or discontinuation. Data cutoff: April 11, 2022., Results: Safety and HRQoL analysis sets: osimertinib, n = 337 and n = 339; placebo, n = 343 each. Median (range) total exposure duration was longer with osimertinib versus placebo: 35.8 (0-38) versus 25.1 (0-39) months. Most adverse events (AEs) were first reported within 12 months of starting treatment (osimertinib 97%, placebo 86%). AEs leading to dose reduction, interruption or discontinuation were reported in 12%, 27% and 13% respectively of patients with osimertinib; 1%, 13% and 3% with placebo. Stomatitis and diarrhea were the most common AEs leading to osimertinib dose reduction or interruption; interstitial lung disease was the most common leading to osimertinib discontinuation (per protocol). There were no differences in time to deterioration for SF-36 physical, mental component summaries between osimertinib and placebo., Conclusions: No new safety signals were reported and HRQoL was maintained with 3 years of adjuvant osimertinib treatment. Combined with significant efficacy benefit, these data further support adjuvant osimertinib in stage IB to IIIA EGFR-mutated NSCLC., (Copyright © 2023 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The development of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) represents a paradigm shift in the treatment of lung cancer with EGFR mutations. Aumolertinib has been shown to be a safe agent in the registry study. However, successful rechallenge with aumolertinib following osimertinib-induced myocardial damage has not been reported. In this article, a case of neoadjuvant therapy for lung adenocarcinoma is retrospectively analyzed, and the relevant literature is reviewed. The patient was diagnosed with stage IIIA lung adenocarcinoma, and genetic testing revealed EGFR exon 19 deletion mutation combined with Tumor Protein p53 (TP53) mutation. The mutation abundance is 33.5 and 14%, respectively. One month after osimertinib treatment, the patient developed myocardial damage, and abnormal indicators such as myocardial enzyme spectrum showed abnormalities and cardiac insufficiency, followed by pulmonary hypertension and pulmonary edema. Aumolertinib was subsequently used for treatment, following which the myocardial enzyme spectrum returned to normal, and the symptoms of bilateral interstitial edema disappeared. In addition to the disappearance of adverse reactions, the therapeutic effect was excellent; the lung lesions and mediastinal lymph nodes were significantly reduced, and the operation was successfully conducted. This is the first report of successful neoadjuvant treatment of EGFR exon 19 deletion combined with TP53 mutation in NSCLC using aumolertinib after osimertinib-induced myocardial damage. The results suggested that aumolertinib had fewer adverse reactions in patients with EGFR exon 19 deletion combined with TP53 mutation, and aumolertinib may be a potential neoadjuvant therapy for stage IIIA lung cancer., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Purpose: ASTRIS study aimed the largest to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of second- or higher-line osimertinib in patients with advanced/metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the real-world setting. Here we report the results of Chinese patients in ASTRIS study., Methods: Adults with EGFR T790M-positive advanced NSCLC pretreated with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), having a WHO performance status score of 0-2 and asymptomatic, stable central nervous system (CNS) metastases were included. All patients received once-daily osimertinib 80 mg orally. The outcomes included investigator-assessed clinical response, progression-free survival (PFS), time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD), and safety., Results: A total of 1350 patients were included. Response rate was 55.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.58). The median PFS and the median TTD were 11.7 months (95% CI 11.1-12.5) and 13.9 months (95% CI 13.1-15.2), respectively. Overall, 389 patients (28.8%) had at least one protocol-specified adverse event (AE); AEs of interstitial lung diseases/pneumonitis-like events and QT prolongation were reported in 3 (0.2%) and 59 (4.4%) patients, respectively., Conclusion: Osimertinib was effective in Chinese patients with T790M-positive NSCLC who had progressed after first- or second-generation EGFR-TKI in real-word setting and the results were consistent with ASTRIS study overall population and AURA studies. No new safety signals or events were identified., Clinical Trial Number: NCT02474355., (© 2023. The Author(s).)