Search

The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with operable breast cancer allows for assessment of treatment response and subsequent tailoring of adjuvant therapy. Data are limited with respect to outcomes among patients with a heavy residual tumor burden after NAC. We report outcomes in patients who had exceptionally poor responses to NAC: those with9 involved nodes after NAC or with 5 cm or more of residual disease in the breast.Between June 2014 and April 2020, 1511 patients with breast cancer received NAC followed by surgery at our institution. Poor responders, defined as those with positive nodes or residual tumor in the breast, were identified for analysis. Patients were further classified into 3 groups for comparison purposes: (1) 1 to 3 positive nodes; (2) 4 to 9 positive nodes; or (3)9 positive nodes and/or5 cm of residual tumor, which was defined as high-volume residual (HVR). Recurrence and survival outcomes were compared based on residual disease burden after NAC.Among 934 poor responders, 539 patients had 1 to 3 positive nodes (ypN1), 215 had 4 to 9 positive nodes (ypN2), and 180 had HVR disease. Specifically, 118 had9 positive nodes (HVR), and 62 patients had5 cm of residual tumor in the breast. With a median follow-up of 31 months (interquartile range, 18-46), the 5-year overall survival rate was 88% among ypN1, 76% among ypN2, and 72% among patients with HVR disease (P.001). The 5-year distant recurrence-free survival and locoregional recurrence incidences were 82% and 7.6% among ypN1 versus 67% and 8.4% among ypN2 versus 53% and 12% among HVR, respectively.Our work suggests that patients with HVR disease are at high risk for locoregional and distant recurrence as well as death, despite best available standard-of-care treatment. Intensification of locoregional therapies and/or alternative adjuvant systemic treatment may improve outcomes in these poor responders.

Invasive lobular breast cancers (ILCs) respond poorly to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The degree of benefit of NAC among non-classic ILC (NC-ILC) variants compared with classic ILCs (C-ILCs) is unknown.Consecutive patients with Stage I-III ILC treated from 2003 to 2019 with NAC and surgery were identified, and grouped as C-ILC or NC-ILC as per the original surgical pathology report, with pathologist (A.G.) review performed if original categorization was unclear. A subset of similarly treated invasive ductal cancers (IDCs) was identified for comparison. Clinicopathologic characteristics and pathologic complete response (pCR) rates were evaluated.Of 145 patients with ILC, 101 (70%) were C-ILC and 44 (30%) were NC-ILC (IDC cohort: 1157 patients). ILC patients were older, more often cT3/T4 and cN2/N3, and less often high-grade compared to IDC patients. Those with NC-ILC were less often ER+/HER2- (55% versus 93%), and more often HER2 + (25% versus 7%) and TN (21% versus 0%, all p 0.001). Breast pCR was more common among NC-ILC, but most frequent in IDC. Nodal pCR rates were also lowest among C-ILC patients, but similar among NC-ILC and IDC patients. On multivariable analysis, C-ILC (OR 0.09) and LVI (OR 0.51) were predictive of lack of breast pCR; non-ER+/HER2- subtypes and breast pCR were predictive of nodal pCR. When our analysis was repeated with patients stratified by receptor subtype, histology was not independently predictive of either breast or nodal pCR.NC-ILC patients were significantly more likely to achieve breast and nodal pCR compared with C-ILC patients, but when stratified by subtype, histology was not independently predictive of breast or nodal pCR.

Despite advances in neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST), some patients with aggressive T4 breast cancers do not respond. The efficacy of ‘heroic’ mastectomy in maintaining local control is unclear. In consecutive patients with primary or recurrent T4 cancers with < 50% shrinkage on NST who underwent mastectomy from 2007 to 2017, clinicopathologic characteristics and locoregional recurrence (LRR) were examined. Among 104 patients, 59 (57%) had primary T4M0, 12 (12%) had locally recurrent T4M0, and 33 (32%) had T4M1 disease. Median age was 58.5 years and the majority had high-grade (74%) ductal cancers (85%); 45 (44%) were estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (ER+/HER2−), 26 (25%) were HER2 positive (HER2+), and 31 (30%) were triple negative (TN). Postoperative complications developed in 41 (39%) patients. At a median follow-up of 37 months, 42 (40%) patients developed LRR. TN (hazard ratio [HR] 7.5) and HER2+ (HR 2.67) subtypes, lymphovascular invasion (LVI; HR 3.80), and positive margins (HR 4.09) were predictive of LRR. The 3-year LRR rate was highest and overall survival (OS) was lowest among patients with TN cancers, at 66% (95% confidence interval [CI] 48–83%) and 30% (95% CI 14–47%), respectively. After heroic mastectomy, postoperative complications were frequent and LRR occurred in 40% of patients despite a median OS of 3.8 years. Among TN patients, the 3-year LRR rate of 66% and 3-year OS of 30% suggest limited surgery benefit. Careful patient selection is prudent when considering heroic mastectomy.

Historically, more than one-third of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) underwent additional surgery. The SSO-ASTRO guidelines advise 2 mm margins for patients with DCIS having BCS and whole-breast radiation (WBRT). Here we examine guideline impact on additional surgery and factors associated with re-excision. Patients treated with BCS for pure DCIS from August 2015 to January 2018 were identified. Guidelines were adopted on September 1, 2016, and all patients had separately submitted cavity-shave margins. Clinicopathologic characteristics, margin status, and rates of additional surgery were examined. Among 650 patients with DCIS who attempted BCS, 50 (8%) converted to mastectomy. Of 600 who had BCS as final surgery, 336 (56%) received WBRT and comprised our study group. One hundred twenty-eight (38%) were treated pre-guideline and 208 (62%) were treated post-guideline. Characteristics and margin status were similar between groups. The re-excision rate was 38% pre-guideline adoption and 29% post-guideline adoption (p = 0.09), with 91% having only one re-excision. Re-excision for ≥ 2 mm margins was uncommon (6% pre-guideline vs. 5% post-guideline). On multivariate analysis, younger age (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.94–0.99, p = 0.02) and larger DCIS size (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.2–1.8, p

Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) can be avoided in node-positive patients who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) if three or more negative sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) are retrieved. We evaluate how often node-positive patients avoid ALND with NAC, and identify predictors of identification of three or more SLNs and of nodal pathological complete response (pCR). From November 2013 to July 2019, all patients with cT1-3, biopsy-proven N1 tumors who converted to cN0 after NAC received SLN biopsy (SLNB) with dual mapping and were identified from a prospectively maintained database. 630 consecutive N1 patients were eligible for axillary downstaging with NAC; 573 (91%) converted to cN0 and had SLNB, and 531 patients (93%) had three or more SLNs identified. Lymphovascular invasion (LVI; odds ratio [OR] 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.24–0.87; p = 0.02) and increasing body mass index (BMI; OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.62–0.96 per 5-unit increase; p = 0.02) were significantly associated with failure to identify three or more SLNs. 255/573 (46%) patients achieved nodal pCR; 237 (41%) had adequate mapping. Factors associated with ALND avoidance included high grade (OR 2.51, 95% CI 1.6–3.94, p = 0.001) and receptor status (HR+/HER2− [referent]: OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.15–3.46 [p = 0.01] for HR−/HER2−, OR 3.93, 95% CI 2.40–6.44 [p

The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011 trial demonstrated the safety of omitting axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in T1–T2cN0 patients with fewer than three positive sentinel nodes (SLNs) undergoing breast-conservation therapy. While microscopic extracapsular extension (mECE) > 2 mm is associated with increased nodal burden, the significance of extranodal tumor deposits (ETDs) in the axillary fat is uncertain. Consecutive patients with T1–T2cN0 breast cancer undergoing sentinel node biopsy and ALND for SLN metastases from January 2010 to December 2018 were identified. ETDs were defined as intravascular tumor emboli or metastatic deposits in the axillary fat. Clinicopathologic characteristics and nodal burden were compared by ETD status. Among 1114 patients, 113 (10%) had ETDs: 81 (72%) were intravascular tumor emboli and 32 (28%) were soft tissue deposits. Patients with ETDs had larger tumors (median 2.2 vs. 2.1 cm; p = 0.033) and more often had mECE (83% vs. 44%; p

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Standard options for the treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) include breast-conserving surgery (BCS) alone; BCS with radiotherapy or endocrine therapy, or both; and mastectomy. Survival is excellent with all options, but rates of local recurrence (LR) vary, as do quality-of-life measures. Here we discuss treatment outcomes, risk factors for LR, and tools for risk estimation. RECENT FINDINGS: After BCS, radiotherapy reduces the risk of LR by half, and endocrine therapy reduces the risk by a third. Young age, inadequate margins, and greater volume of disease are associated with higher risk of LR after BCS, while young age, high grade, and microinvasion are associated with higher risk of locoregional recurrence after mastectomy. Clinical tools, including the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) DCIS nomogram, provide LR risk estimates after BCS that appear more accurate than current genomic assays. The safety of active surveillance for seemingly low-risk patients remains uncertain. SUMMARY: Estimation of LR risk, utilizing a multitude of clinicopathologic and treatment factors, can help a woman balance that risk with her values and priorities, and allow her to choose the optimal treatment option for her.

Younger women (age ≤ 40 years) with breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) have higher rates of pathologic complete response (pCR); however, it is unknown whether axillary or breast downstaging rates differ by age. In this study, we compared pCR incidence and surgical downstaging rates of the breast and axilla post NAC, between patients aged ≤ 40, 41-60, and ≥ 61 years.We identified 1383 women with stage I-III breast cancer treated with NAC and subsequent surgery from November 2013 to December 2018. pCR and breast/axillary downstaging rates were assessed and compared across age groups.Younger women were significantly more likely to have ductal histology, poorly differentiated tumors, and BRCA mutations; 35% of tumors were hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-), 36% were HER2-positive (HER2+), and 29% were triple negative (TN), with similar subtype distribution across age groups (p = 0.6). Overall, pCR rates did not differ by age, however among patients with TN tumors (n = 394), younger women had higher pCR rates (52% vs. 35% among those aged 41-60 years and 29% among those aged ≥61 years; p = 0.007) and were more likely to have tumors with high tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) concentrations (p 0.001). Downstaging to breast-conserving surgery (BCS) eligibility post NAC among initially BCS-ineligible patients was similar across age groups; younger women chose BCS less often (p 0.001). Among cN1 patients (n = 813), 52% of women ≤40 years of age avoided axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) with NAC, versus 39% and 37% in the older groups (p 0.001).Younger women undergoing NAC for axillary downstaging were more likely to avoid ALND across all subtypes; however, overall pCR rates did not differ by age. Despite equivalent breast downstaging and BCS eligibility rates across age groups, younger women were less likely to undergo BCS.

Importance Prospective trials have demonstrated sentinel lymph node (SLN) false-negative rates of less than 10% when 3 or more SLNs are retrieved in patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer rendered clinically node-negative with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). However, rates of nodal recurrence in such patients treated with SLN biopsy (SLNB) alone are unknown because axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was performed in all patients, limiting adoption of this approach. Objective To evaluate nodal recurrence rates in a consecutive cohort of patients with clinically node-positive (cN1) breast cancer receiving NAC, followed by a negative SLNB using a standardized technique, and no further axillary surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants From November 2013 to February 2019, a cohort of consecutively identified patients with cT1 to cT3 biopsy-proven N1 breast cancer rendered cN0 by NAC underwent SLNB with dual tracer mapping and omission of ALND if 3 or more SLNs were identified and all were pathologically negative. Metastatic nodes were not routinely clipped, and localization of clipped nodes was not performed. The study was performed in a single tertiary cancer center. Intervention Omission of ALND in patients with cN1 breast cancer after NAC if 3 or more SLNs were pathologically negative. Main Outcome and Measures The primary outcome was the rate of nodal recurrence among patients with cN1 breast cancer treated with SLNB alone after NAC. Results Of 610 patients with cN1 breast cancer treated with NAC (median [IQR] age, 49 [40-58] years), 555 (91%) converted to cN0 and underwent SLNB; 234 (42%) had 3 or more negative SLNs and had SLNB alone. Median age was 49 years. Median tumor size was 3 cm; 144 (62%) wereERBB2(formerlyHER2)-positive, and 43 (18%) were triple negative. Most (212 [91%]) received doxorubicin-based NAC, 205 (88%) received adjuvant radiotherapy (RT), and 164 (70%) also received nodal RT. At a median follow-up of 40 months, there was 1 axillary nodal recurrence synchronous with local recurrence in a patient who refused RT. Among patients who received RT (n = 205), there were no nodal recurrences. Conclusions and Relevance This cohort study found that in patients with cN1 disease rendered cN0 with NAC, with 3 or more negative SLNs with SLNB alone, nodal recurrence rates were low, without routine nodal clipping. These findings potentially support omitting ALND in such patients.

BACKGROUND In early studies, local recurrence (LR) rates were higher after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in comparison with upfront surgery. Modern outcomes are uncertain, particularly among those who are initially breast-conserving surgery-ineligible (BCSi) and downstage to being breast-conserving surgery-eligible (BCSe). METHODS Among patients with cT1-3 breast cancer treated from 2014 to 2018 who were BCSe after NAC, clinicopathologic characteristics and LR were compared between initially BCSe patients and BCSi patients who downstaged. Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) eligibility was determined prospectively. RESULTS Among 685 patients, 243 (35%) were BCSe before and after NAC and had BCS; 282 (41%) were BCSi before NAC, downstaged to BCSe, and had BCS; and 160 (23%) were BCSi before NAC, downstaged to BCSe, and chose mastectomy. The median age was 52 years, and most cancers were cT1-2 (84%), cN+ (61%), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+; 38%) or triple-negative (34%). Those who were BCSe before NAC had a lower cT stage, whereas those who chose mastectomy were younger (P < .05). NAC was usually ACT (doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and a taxane)-based (92%), 99% of HER2+ patients received dual blockade, and 99% of BCS patients received adjuvant radiation. At a median follow-up of 35 months, 22 patients (3.2%) had developed LR. The Kaplan-Meier 4-year LR rates were not different among the groups (1.9% for those who were BCSe before and after NAC, 6.3% for those who downstaged to being BCSe and underwent BCS, and 2.7% for those who downstaged and underwent mastectomy; P = .17). CONCLUSIONS LR rates are low after NAC and BCS, even among BCSi patients who downstage, and they are not improved in patients who downstage and choose mastectomy. Mastectomy can be safely avoided in BCSi patients who downstage with NAC.

BACKGROUND: A margin of “no ink on tumor” has been established for primary breast conservation therapy (BCT), but the appropriate margin following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) remains controversial. We examined the impact of margin width on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) in the NAC-BCT population. METHODS: Consecutive patients receiving NAC-BCT were identified from a prospective database. The association between clinicopathologic characteristics, margin width and isolated IBTR was evaluated. RESULTS: From 2013–2019, we identified 582 patients with 586 tumors who received NAC-BCT. The median age of the cohort was 54 years (IQR 45, 62); 84% of patients had cT1/T2 tumors and 61% were clinically node positive. The majority of tumors were HER2+ (38%) or triple negative (TN) (31%). Pathologic complete response was observed in 29%. Margin width was >2 mm in 517 tumors (88%) and ≤2 mm in 69 (12%). At a median follow-up of 39 months, 14 patients had IBTR as a first event, with 64% occurring within 24 months of surgery. The 4-year IBTR rate was 2% (95% CI 1–4%), and there was no difference based on margin width (3% ≤2 mm vs. 2% >2 mm; p = not significant). On univariate analysis, clinical and pathologic T stage and receptor subtype, but not margin width, were associated with IBTR (p < 0.05). On multivariable analysis, TN subtype and higher pathologic T stage were associated with isolated IBTR (both p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Pathologic features and tumor biology, not margin width, were associated with IBTR in NAC-BCT patients.

BACKGROUND. Locoregional recurrence (LRR) after breast–conserving surgery (BCS) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is increased in young women. We examined the impact of age on LRR and distant disease after mastectomy for DCIS ± microinvasion. METHODS. We identified consecutive patients with DCIS ± microinvasion treated with mastectomy from 1995 to 2017. LRR was defined as recurrence at the ipsilateral chest wall or regional nodes. RESULTS. Overall, 3121 cases were identified, of which 421 (13.5%) had DCIS + microinvasion. Median age was 49 years and median follow–up was 6.4 years; 821 were followed for 10 or more years. Thirty–four LRRs were observed: 33 (97%) were invasive, and 23 (68%) were in the chest wall alone. Cumulative 10–year LRR incidence was 1.4%. Age

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with operable breast cancer allows for assessment of treatment response, and subsequent tailoring of adjuvant therapy. While there is robust evidence demonstrating worse prognosis with residual disease versus path CR after NAC, there is little data regarding outcomes among patients with a heavy residual tumor burden after NAC. We report outcomes in patients who have exceptionally poor responses to NAC-those with > 9 nodes after NAC or with 5 cm or more of residual disease in the breast. MATERIALS/METHODS Between 06/2014 and 04/2020, 1511 patients received NAC followed by surgery at our institution. Poor responders, defined as those with positive nodes or residual tumor in the breast, were identified for analysis. Those with 1-3 positive nodes after NAC were used as a comparison cohort. Recurrence and survival outcomes were compared based on residual disease burden after NAC. Clinicopathologic parameters were summarized with descriptive statistics. Overall survival and recurrence-free survival estimates were calculated using Kaplan Meier methodology. RESULTS Among 517 poor-responders, 315 patients had 1-3 positive nodes (N1a), 108 had 4-9 positive nodes (N2a), and 62 had > 9 positive nodes (high-volume residual, HVR); 32 patients with > 5cm of residual tumor in the breast were categorized as HVR. With a median follow-up of 39 months (IQR 27-50), the 5-year overall survival rate was 90% among N1a, 72% among N2a, and 78% among HVR patients (P = 0.003). The 5-year distant recurrence-free survival and local recurrence-free survival rates were 87%/87% among N1a vs. 59%/71% among N2a vs. 68%/75% among HVR (P < 0.001 and P = 0.009), respectively. 5-year local-regional and distant recurrence cumulative incidence rates, stratified by residual disease burden and by breast cancer subtype, are shown in Table 1. CONCLUSION Our work confirms that patients with high-volume residual are at high risk for LR and distant recurrence as well as death, despite best available standard-of-care treatment. ypN2a patients appear to perform as bad as HVR patients in terms of DM and death, but better in terms of local-regional recurrence. Triple-negative patients with residual disease had high rates of recurrence and death compared to other subtypes. Treatment intensification efforts are urgently needed.

Background: Four prospective multi-institutional trials have demonstrated that clinically node-positive patients (cN1) who receive neoadjuvant therapy (NAC) and convert to cN0 can be reliably staged with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with false-negative rates (FNRs) of < 10%, when ≥ 3 SLNs are retrieved. Since study patients all had axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), the rate of axillary recurrence after SLNB alone is unknown. Of concern is the possibility that residual chemotherapy-resistant axillary disease could lead to higher recurrence rates than seen in the primary surgery setting for cN0 patients where SLN FNRs of 5-10% result in axillary recurrence in < 1% of cases. Here we report regional recurrence rates in a prospectively defined cohort of cN1 patients receiving NAC, followed by a negative SLNB using a standardized technique, and no further axillary surgery. Methods: From 06/2014 to 02/2019, patients with cT1-3 biopsy-proven cN1 breast cancer who received NAC and converted to cN0 by physical exam were prospectively managed with SLNB with dual tracer mapping and omission of ALND if ≥ 3 SLNs were pathologically negative. Nodes were not routinely clipped, and retrieval of clipped metastatic nodes was not required. Pathologically negative SLNs were defined as the absence of any metastases including isolated tumor cells. Results: Of 610 cN1 patients treated with NAC, 555 (91%) converted to cN0 and had SLNB; 234 (42%) had ≥ 3 negative SLNs and were treated with SLNB alone. Median patient age was 49 years and median tumor size at presentation was 3 cm; 61% were HER2+ and 18% triple negative. Most (91%) received doxorubicin-based NAC and 88% received adjuvant radiotherapy (RT), with 80% (n = 164) of RT patients receiving nodal RT (Table). At a median follow-up of 35 months, there was only 1 (0.4%) axillary recurrence for the entire cohort, synchronous with a breast recurrence, in a patient who refused RT. Among patients who received RT (n = 205), there were no axillary recurrences. The 4-year rate of distant recurrence for all patients was 6.1% (95% CI, 3.4-10.7%) and 4-year overall survival was 93.9% (95% CI, 87.6-97.1%). Conclusion: In cN1 patients treated with NAC, rates of axillary recurrence in patients with ≥ 3 pathologically negative SLNs treated with SLNB alone were low, without routine nodal clipping. Although further follow-up is needed, multiple studies have shown that nodal recurrence is an early event, particularly in HER2+ and triple negative patients, who comprised the majority of the population. Our findings support omitting ALND in cN1 patients after NAC when the SLNs are negative using an optimal SLNB technique. Table. Patient PopulationOverall cohort (n = 234)Age, years (median, IQR)49 (40, 58)Tumor size at presentation, cm (median, IQR)3.0 (2.2, 5.0)Number SLNs retrieved (median, IQR)4 (3, 5)Palpable nodes at presentation (n, %)179 (76%)HistologyDuctal211 (90%)Lobular and mixed7 (3%)Micropapillary and mixed10 (4%)Other3 (1%)Occult3 (1%)DifferentiationWell1 (0.5%)Moderate36 (15%)Poor196 (84%)Unknown1 (0.5%)Receptor StatusHR+/HER2-47 (20%)HR+/HER2+80 (34%)HR-/HER2+64 (27%)HR-/HER2-43 (18%)Breast SurgeryBCS118 (50%)Mastectomy116 (50%)Breast pCR¥Yes161 (70%)No70 (30%)NAC regimenAC-T197 (84%)AC-T + carbo15 (6.4%)TC8 (3.4%)Other14 (6%)Neoadjuvant anti-HER2 treatmentHP (dual-therapy)144 (100%)Adjuvant RTYes205 (88%)No*29 (12%)¥3 patients had occult primary breast cancer and were not included in breast pCR calculation; *6/29 patients who did not receive RT enrolled in NSABP B-51 Citation Format: Andrea V Barrio, Giacomo Montagna, Anita Mamtani, Varadan Sevilimedu, Hiram S Cody, III, Mahmoud El-Tamer, Mary L Gemignani, Alexandra S Heerdt, Tracy-Ann Moo, Melissa Pilewskie, George Plitas, Lisa Sclafani, Kimberly J Van Zee, Monica Morrow. Axillary recurrence is a rare event in node-positive patients. treated with sentinel node biopsy alone after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Results of a prospective study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD4-05.

Randomized trials demonstrate equivalent locoregional control with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for T1–2 micrometastatic breast cancer, but include few mastectomy patients. Consensus is lacking on indications for post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in this population. Herein, we evaluate locoregional recurrence (LRR) in an unselected, modern cohort of T1–2 breast cancer patients with micrometastases or isolated tumor cells (ITCs; N0i+/N1mi) having a mastectomy. We identified patients with T1–2N0i+/N1mi breast cancer treated with mastectomy from January 2006 to December 2011. Recurrent, bilateral, and neoadjuvant cases were excluded. The primary outcome of interest was LRR. Overall, 352 patients [211 (60%) with ITCs and 141 (40%) with micrometastases] were identified. 162 (46%) patients had SLNB alone and one node was positive in 295 (84%) cases; 31 (9%) patients had PMRT and 95% had systemic therapy. At a median 6 years of follow-up, the overall crude LRR rate was 2.8% (n = 9), with no axillary recurrences, and the crude LRR rate was 3.9% among those who had SNB alone. Those with LRR had a median age of 55 years, median tumor size of 1.7 cm, and ductal histology; the majority were high-grade (89%) and estrogen receptor positive (78%), with one positive node (89%). There was no association between LRR and receipt of PMRT (p = 0.4), SLNB versus ALND (p = 0.2), or number of positive nodes (p = 0.7) using the log-rank test. LRR was infrequent among T1–2N0i+/N1mi patients treated with mastectomy without PMRT, with no axillary failures, suggesting that PMRT or nodal radiotherapy are not routinely indicated in this population.

BACKGROUND Indications for postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in patients with T1 to T2, lymph node-negative (N0) breast cancer with “high-risk” features are controversial. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 22922 and National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group MA20 trials reporting improved 10-year disease-free survival with lymph node irradiation included patients with high-risk N0 disease, but, to the authors’ knowledge, benefits in patients receiving modern systemic therapy are uncertain. METHODS The authors retrospectively identified patients with T1 to T2N0 disease who were treated with mastectomy from January 2006 through December 2011. High-risk features included age .05). Receipt of systemic therapy decreased the LRR rate (hazard ratio, 0.40; P = .03). Although crude LRR rates increased from 3.8% to 9.4% with 1 versus ≥ 4 high-risk features, the number of risk factors was not found to be significantly associated with LRR (P = .54). CONCLUSIONS In the current study, a low crude LRR rate (4.7%) was observed in a large unselected cohort of patients with T1 to T2N0 breast cancer with high-risk features who were treated with mastectomy and systemic therapy without PMRT. Although increasing tumor size and the omission of systemic therapy were found to be predictive, other features did not confer a higher LRR risk either independently or together, and do not by themselves mandate the use of PMRT in this patient population. Cancer 2017;123:2626-33. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Background: Indications for post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in T1-T2, node negative (N0) breast cancer patients with “high-risk” features are controversial based on lack of consensus as to what constitutes “high-risk”, and variable results of small retrospective studies. The EORTC 22922 and MA20 trials reporting improved 10-year disease-free survival with nodal irradiation included high-risk N0 patients but these patients were not analyzed separately and did not receive modern systemic therapy. We sought to evaluate long-term locoregional control in T1-T2N0 patients with high-risk features undergoing mastectomy in the contemporary era. Methods: We retrospectively identified patients with T1-T2N0 breast cancer with ≥1 high-risk feature treated with mastectomy from 1/2006-12/2011. High-risk features were defined as age Results: Among 672 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 187 (28%) had 1 risk factor: 21 (3%) were age Table 1: Clinicopathologic characteristics, n = 657 Median (Range)Age, years49 (24-89)Tumor size, cm1.4 ( Sentinel node biopsy alone was performed in 98% of these patients. A median of 4 lymph nodes were retrieved (range 1-15). Adjuvant systemic therapy was received by 86% of patients. At median 5.6 years of follow-up, overall LRR rate was 4.7% (n = 31), with the majority (55%) of events involving the chest wall. Increasing tumor size was associated with LRR (HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.26–2.29, p = 0.006), while age, histology, grade, subtype, LVI, multifocality/multicentricity, and tumor location were not (all p > 0.05). Although rate of LRR increased from 3.8% to 9.4% with 1 vs. ≥4 high-risk features, a comparison of 1 vs. 2 vs. 3 vs. ≥4 risk factors was not significant by Kaplan-Meier estimation (p = 0.54). Conclusions: A low LRR rate of 4.7% was seen in this large unselected cohort of T1-T2N0 cancers with "high-risk" features treated by mastectomy and systemic therapy without PMRT. While increasing tumor size was predictive, other features did not confer a higher risk of LRR either independently or together, and do not by themselves mandate the use of PMRT in this population. Citation Format: Mamtani A, Patil S, Stempel M, Morrow M. Are there patients with T1-T2, node-negative breast cancer who are high-risk for locoregional recurrence? [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-13-07.

Objectives Trastuzumab (H) and pertuzumab (P) with standard chemotherapy is approved for use in the neoadjuvant setting for human epidermal growth receptor 2 -positive patients. A retrospective analysis was performed of patients treated with dose-dense (dd) doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by paclitaxel (T), trastuzumab, and pertuzumab (THP) in the neoadjuvant setting. Here, the pathologic complete response (pCR) rates are reported. Methods An electronic medical record review was conducted of patients treated with HP-based therapy in the neoadjuvant setting from September 1, 2013, to March 1, 2015. Data on patient demographics, stage of breast cancer, pathology reports, surgical data, and information on systemic therapy were collected. The pCR was defined as total (tpCR, ypT0/is ypN0), German Breast Group (GBG) pCR (ypT0 ypN0), breast pCR (bpCR) with in situ disease (ypT0/is) and without in situ disease (ypT0), and explored axillary pCR (ypN0). Results Charts from 66 patients were reviewed, and 57 patients were evaluable for pCR. Median age was 46 years (range 26-68 years). Median tumor size was 4 cm. Of 57 patients, 53 (93%) had operable breast cancer (T1-3, N0-1, M0). Three patients (5.3%) had locally advanced disease (T2-3, N2-3, M0 or T4a-c, any N, M0), and 1 (1.7%) had inflammatory breast cancer (T4d, any N, M0). Overall, 44 (77%) and 13 (23%) had hormone receptor (HR)-positive and negative diseases, respectively. Median numbers of cycles of neoadjuvant treatment were as follows: AC (4, range 1-4), T (4, range 1-4), trastuzumab (6, range 3-8), and pertuzumab (6, range 2-8). In these 57 patients, the rates of tpCR and bpCR with in situ disease were demonstrated in 41/57 (72%) patients, and the rates of GBG pCR and bpCR without in situ disease were found in 30/57 (53%) patients. Of 26 patients with biopsy-proven lymph nodal involvement, axillary pCR occurred in 22 (85%) patients. Conclusion At a single center, the tpCR and GBG pCR rates of dd AC followed by THP are high at 72% and 53%, respectively. The Oncologist 2017;22:139-143Implications for Practice: This is the first study describing the role of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel and dual anti-HER2 therapy with trastuzumab and pertuzumab (ACTHP) in patients with early stage HER2-positive breast cancer. Total (breast + lymph node) pathological complete remission (pCR) remission (ypT0/is ypN0) and German Breast Group pCR rates (ypT0/ ypN0) were high at 72% and 53%, respectively, with the ACTHP regimen. Rate of axillary clearance in patients with known axillary involvement was high at 85%, which may translate into less extensive axillary surgeries in this subset in the future.

This study aimed to determine the relationship between mammographic calcifications and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) tumoral enhancement before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and to assess the impact of these findings on surgical management. This Institutional Review Board-approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant retrospective study involved breast cancer patients who underwent NAC between 2009 and 2015. The study cohort comprised 90 patients with pre- and posttreatment MRI and mammograms demonstrating calcifications within the tumor bed either at presentation or after treatment. The data gathered included pre- and post-NAC imaging findings and post-NAC histopathology, particularly findings associated with calcifications. Comparisons were made using Fisher’s exact test, with p values lower than 0.05 considered significant. Complete resolution of MRI enhancement occurred for 44% of the patients, and a pathologic complete response (pCR) was achieved for 32% of the patients. No statistically significant correlation between changes in mammographic calcifications and MRI enhancement was found (p = 0.12). Resolution of enhancement was strongly correlated with pCR (p < 0.0001). The majority of the patients with pCR demonstrated complete resolution of enhancement (79%, 23/29). No statistically significant relationship was found between changes in calcifications and rates of pCR (p = 0.06). A pCR was achieved most frequently for patients with resolution of enhancement and new, increasing, or unchanged calcifications (p < 0.0001). Although calcifications seen on post-NAC mammography may be associated with benign disease, loss of MRI enhancement does not predict the absence of residual tumor with sufficient accuracy to leave calcifications in place. Complete excision of tumor bed calcifications remains standard practice and a substantial limitation to NAC use for downstaging patients to be eligible for breast conservation treatment.

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) endorses sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with clinically positive axillary nodes who downstage after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). In this study, we compared the accuracy of post-NAC MRI to clinical exam alone in predicting pathologic status of sentinel lymph nodes in cN1 patients. We identified patients with T0-3, N1 breast cancer who underwent NAC and subsequent SLNB from March 2014 to July 2017. Patients were grouped based on whether a post-NAC MRI was done. MRI accuracy in predicting SLN status was assessed versus clinical exam alone. A total of 450 patients met initial study criteria; 269 were analyzed after excluding patients without biopsy-confirmed nodal disease, palpable disease after NAC, and failed SLN mapping. Median age was 49 years. Post-NAC MRI was done in 68% (182/269). Patients undergoing lumpectomy vs mastectomy more frequently received a post-NAC MRI (88 vs 54%, p

Background Understanding the underlying factors associated with unplanned readmissions is an important first step toward interventions designed to improve quality of care. This study aimed to identify predictors of unplanned 30-day readmission using a national breast surgery cohort. Study design Using the National Cancer Database, we performed a review of patients undergoing surgery for breast cancer from 2006 to 2014. A multivariatble logistic regression model was generated to assess predictors of 30-day unplanned readmission. Results Of 944,092 patients identified, 15,695 (1.7%) had an unplanned readmission within 30 days. Significant predictors of readmission included: increased procedure complexity, high co-morbidity score, Medicaid or lack of insurance, and low annual hospital volume; p Conclusion Unplanned readmission following breast surgery is an uncommon event. However, our results demonstrate risk factors associated with higher rates of readmission following surgery. Understanding the underlying causes for readmission allows for identification of high-risk individuals and the design of targeted intervention programs.

The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011 trial demonstrated that axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) may be omitted for women with two or fewer positive sentinel nodes (SLNs) undergoing breast-conservation therapy (BCT). Lobular histology comprises a minority of patients, and applicability to these discohesive cancers has been questioned. From August 2010 to March 2017, patients undergoing BCT for cT1-2N0 cancer with positive SLNs were prospectively managed with ALND for three or more positive SLNs or gross extracapsular extension (ECE). In this study, clinicopathologic characteristics and nodal burden were compared between pure/mixed invasive lobular cancer (ILC) and invasive ductal cancer (IDC) patients. Among 813 consecutive patients, 104 (12.8%) had ILC and 709 (87.2%) had IDC. ILC was more often multifocal and low grade, and less frequently had lymphovascular invasion (all p

The understanding of margins has changed with awareness that factors in addition to tumor burden such as tumor biology and the effectiveness of systemic therapy impact local control in invasive cancer. This chapter reviews pathologic techniques of margin assessment and what is known about the relationship between margin width and local control for invasive carcinoma and intraductal carcinoma.

Nodal staging with sentinel node biopsy (SLNB), post-lumpectomy radiotherapy (RT), and endocrine therapy (ET) for estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) tumors is valuable in the treatment of early-stage (stages 1 or 2) breast cancer but used less often for elderly women.This retrospective study investigated women referred for surgical evaluation of biopsy-proven primary early-stage invasive breast cancer from January 2001 to December 2010. Clinicopathologic features, treatment course, and outcomes for women ages 80-89 years and 50-59 years were compared.The study identified 178 eligible women ages 80-89 years and 169 women ages 50-59 years. The elderly women more often had grade 1 or 2 disease (p = 0.003) and ER+ tumors (p = 0.007) and less frequently had undergone adjuvant therapies (all p ≤ 0.001). Lumpectomy was performed more commonly for the elderly (92 vs. 83 %, p = 0.02), and axillary surgery was less commonly performed (46 vs. 96 %; p 0.001). Fewer elderly women had undergone post-lumpectomy RT (42 vs. 89 %; p 0.001) and ET for ER+ tumors (72 vs. 95 %; p 0.001). During the median follow-up period of 56 months for the 80- to 89-year old group and 98 months for the 50- to 59-year-old group, death from breast cancer was similar (4 vs. 5 %; p = 0.5). The two groups respectively experienced 7 versus 6 locoregional recurrences and 11 versus 13 distant recurrences.The octogenarians had disease survivorship similar to that of the younger women despite less frequent use of adjuvant therapies, likely reflecting lower-risk disease features. Whether increased use of axillary surgery, post-lumpectomy RT, and/or ET for ER+ tumors would further improve outcomes is an important area for further study, but treatment should not be deferred solely on the basis of age.

The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial demonstrated the safety of omitting axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for women with fewer than three positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) who are undergoing breast-conservation therapy (BCT). Because most of the women were postmenopausal with estrogen receptor (ER) positive cancers, applicability of ALND for younger patients and those with triple-negative (TN) or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpressing (HER2+) tumors remains controversial.From August 2010 to December 2015, patients undergoing BCT for cT1-2N0 disease and found to have positive SLNs were prospectively followed. Axillary lymph node dissection was indicated for more than two positive SLNs or gross extracapsular extension. Clinicopathologic characteristics, axillary surgery, nodal burden, and outcomes were compared between the high-risk patients (TN, HER2+, or age 50 years) and the remaining patients, termed average risk patients.Among 701 consecutive patients, 242 (35 %) were high risk: 31 (13 %) with TN, 48 (20 %) with HER2+, 130 (54 %) with age less than 50 years, and 33 (14 %) with more than one high-risk feature. The remaining 459 patients (65 %) were average risk. The high-risk patients were younger, had higher-grade tumors (p 0.0001), and more often had abnormal nodes imaged (p = 0.02). In this study, SLNB alone was performed for 85 % high-risk versus 82 % average-risk cases (p = 0.39). A median of four versus three SLNs were excised (p = 0.04), and both groups had a median of one positive SLN. Additional positive nodes at ALND were found in 62 % high-risk patients versus 65 % average-risk patients (p = 0.8), with a median of three positive nodes in both groups. During a median follow-up period of 31 months, no patients experienced isolated axillary recurrences.Axillary lymph node dissection was no more likely to be indicated for high-risk patients. For patients undergoing ALND, the nodal burden was similar. For patients otherwise meeting the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011 clinical eligibility criteria, ALND is not indicated on the basis of age or subtype.

BACKGROUND: ACOSOG Z0011 demonstrated that axillary dissection (ALND) may be omitted in women with ≤2 positive sentinel nodes (SLNs) undergoing breast-conservation therapy (BCT). Lobular histology comprised a minority, and applicability to these discohesive cancers has been questioned. METHODS: From 8/2010–3/2017, patients having BCT for cT1-2N0 cancer with positive SLNs were prospectively managed with ALND for >2 positive SLNs or gross extracapsular extension (ECE). Clinicopathologic characteristics and nodal burden were compared between pure/mixed invasive lobular cancer (ILC) and invasive ductal cancer (IDC) patients. RESULTS: Among 813 consecutive patients, 104 (12.8%) had ILC and 709 (87.2%) had IDC. ILC was more often multifocal and low-grade, and less frequently had lymphovascular invasion (all p2mm ECE (30.8% ILC vs. 19.5% IDC, p=0.03), but proportion with ≥3 positive SLNs was similar (14.4% ILC vs. 9.9% IDC, p=0.2). ALND was performed in 20 (19.2%) ILC vs. 97 (13.7%) IDC patients (p=0.2). Additional positive nodes were found in 80.0% ILC vs. 56.7% IDC (p=0.09). ALND and nodal burden rates were similar on ER+ subset analysis. On multivariable analysis, lobular histology (p=0.03) and larger tumors (p=0.03) were associated with additional positive nodes. At 42 months median follow-up, there have been no isolated axillary recurrences. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a higher proportion of SLN macrometastases and association with more positive nodes at ALND, lobular histology does not predict need for ALND. ALND is not indicated on the basis of histology among patients otherwise meeting Z0011 criteria.

Key Clinical Message Diabetes insipidus (DI) arises from impaired function of antidiuretic hormone, characterized by hypovolemia, hypernatremia, polyuria, and polydipsia. This case is a reminder of the rare but challenging obstacle that undiagnosed DI poses in fasting surgical patients, requiring prompt recognition and vigilant management of marked homeostatic imbalances.

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is the second most common type of breast cancer, with a unique pathogenesis and distinct clinical biology. These cancers display a characteristic loss of E-cadherin, and the vast majority are estrogen receptor positive (ER+), with a low-to-intermediate grade. These features generally portend a favorable prognosis, but there is a propensity for late recurrences and metastasis to atypical locations. These infiltrative tumors can be more clinically challenging than the more common ductal cancers. Their insidious nature can make them more difficult to diagnose, and they may show a differing response to standard therapies, keeping with the predominantly ER+ phenotype. Although ILC patients comprise a small minority in large breast cancer trials, most fundamentals of locoregional and systemic therapy presently remain shared between all cancer types. Recognizing the nuances of treating ILC remains important, and the recent discovery of novel mutations that are more frequently expressed in ILC holds promise for further investigations into lobular-specific targeted therapies. This review 3 figures, 8 tables and 50 references Key words: aromatase inhibitors, breast cancer, breast conservation, chemotherapy, E-cadherin, invasive lobular carcinoma, mastectomy, The Cancer Genome Analysis

Octogenarians with early-stage breast cancer often have low-risk tumor biology. However, optimal treatment strategies for those with high-risk biology remain unclear. We reviewed the records of women ages 80–89 years with biopsy-proven, Stage I–II invasive breast cancer who were referred for surgical evaluation from January 2001 through December 2010. High-risk was defined as human epidermal growth factor receptor-positive (HER2+), triple-negative (TN), or histologic grade 3 disease. Among 178 patients, 40 (22%) were high-risk: 12 were grade 1–2 (10 HER2 + , 2 TN); 28 were grade 3 (7 HER2+, 6 TN, 15 estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/HER2−). The high-risk group had larger tumors and more often had ductal histology and lymphovascular invasion than the low-risk group and was more likely to undergo mastectomy (18 vs. 5%, p = 0.02), radiotherapy (55 vs. 36%, p = 0.03), and chemotherapy (10 vs. 0%, p = 0.002). Endocrine therapy use was similar among ER+ patients in both groups. The four patients in the high-risk group given chemotherapy were HER2+ and received trastuzumab-based regimens, without any reported toxicities. At median follow-up of 67 months, 10% of the high-risk group had a recurrence (3 distant-only, 1 simultaneous locoregional and distant in a patient treated with mastectomy without radiotherapy). Tailored locoregional and systemic therapy resulted in low incidence of failure in these octogenarians with high-risk cancers with low morbidity. Modern adjuvant therapies should be considered for elderly women with high-risk cancers in the absence of significant comorbidities.

To determine rates of axillary dissection (ALND) and nodal recurrence in patients eligible for ACOSOG Z0011.Z0011 demonstrated that patients with cT1-2N0 breast cancers and 1 to 2 involved sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) having breast-conserving therapy had no difference in locoregional recurrence or survival after SLN biopsy alone or ALND. The generalizability of the results and importance of nodal radiotherapy (RT) is unclear.Patients eligible for Z0011 had SLN biopsy alone. Prospectively defined indications for ALND were metastases in ≥3 SLNs or gross extracapsular extension. Axillary imaging was not routine. SLN and ALND groups and radiation fields were compared with chi-square and t tests. Cumulative incidence of recurrences was estimated with competing risk analysis.From August 2010 to December 2016, 793 patients met Z0011 eligibility criteria and had SLN metastases. Among them, 130 (16%) had ALND; ALND did not vary based on age, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, or HER2 status. Five-year event-free survival after SLN alone was 93% with no isolated axillary recurrences. Cumulative 5-year rates of breast + nodal and nodal + distant recurrence were each 0.7%. In 484 SLN-only patients with known RT fields (103 prone, 280 supine tangent, 101 breast + nodes) and follow-up ≥12 months, the 5-year cumulative nodal recurrence rate was 1% and did not differ significantly by RT fields.We confirm that even without preoperative axillary imaging or routine use of nodal RT, ALND can be avoided in a large majority of Z0011-eligible patients with excellent regional control. This approach has the potential to spare substantial numbers of women the morbidity of ALND.

The natural history of pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ (PLCIS) remains largely unknown. A pathology database search (1995–2012) was performed to identify patients diagnosed with an LCIS variant. Patients with synchronous breast cancer and/or no evidence of pleomorphism were excluded. Original slides were re-evaluated by three pathologists to identify a consensus cohort of PLCIS. Borderline lesions with focal atypia were classified as LCIS with pleomorphic features (LCIS-PF). Clinical data were obtained from medical records. From 233 patients, we identified 32 with an LCIS variant diagnosis and no concurrent breast cancer. Following review, 16 cases were excluded due to lack of pleomorphism. The remaining 16 were classified as PLCIS (n = 11) and LCIS-PF (n = 5). 12/16 patients were treated with surgical excision ± chemoprevention. Patients with a prior breast cancer history and those having mastectomy were excluded from outcome analysis. Among the remaining 7 patients with PLCIS/LCIS-PF, 4/7 (57%) developed ipsilateral breast cancer at a median follow-up of 67 months. Median age at the time of breast cancer diagnosis was 56 years old and median time from PLCIS/LCIS-PF to cancer diagnosis was 59 months (range 45–66 months). The four cancers included 1 invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), 1 microinvasive ILC, 1 invasive ductal carcinoma, and 1 ductal carcinoma in situ. We confirm that PLCIS in isolation is indeed a rare entity, further contributing to the difficulty in determining the actual risk conferred by this lesion. Long-term follow-up data on larger cohorts are needed to define standardized management and outcomes for patients with PLCIS.

Strategies to reduce the likelihood of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) include application of Z0011 or use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Indications for ALND differ by treatment plan, and nodal pathologic complete response rates after NAC vary by tumor subtype. This study compared ALND rates for cT1-2N0 tumors treated with upfront surgery versus those treated with NAC. The ALND rates for cT1-2N0 breast cancer patients were compared by tumor subtype among women undergoing upfront surgery to NAC. Multivariable analysis with control for age, cT stage, and lymphovascular invasion, and stratification by subtype was performed. The study identified 1944 cancers in 1907 women who underwent sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy with or without ALND (669 upfront breast-conserving surgeries [BCSs], 1004 upfront mastectomies, 271 NACs). Compared with the NAC group, the ALND rates in the BCS group were lower for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor-positive (PR+), human epidermal growth factor 2-negative (HER2−) tumors (15 vs 34%; p

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend axillary imaging prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer patients who are clinically node negative (cN0) by physical examination. However, the benefit of this approach remains uncertain. The purpose of this study was to determine whether abnormal axillary imaging pre-NAC predicts nodal metastases post-NAC (ypN+) in cN0 patients. cN0 patients undergoing NAC followed by axillary surgery were identified. Rates of ypN+ were compared among patients with abnormal pre-treatment axillary imaging vs. normal or no pre-treatment imaging using Fisher’s exact test. From May 2008 to March 2016, 402 eligible cN0 patients were identified. The median age of the patients was 49.5 years, and the median tumor size was 4 cm. Of these patients, 38% were estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−), 30% were HER2+ , and 32% were triple negative. All had pre-NAC mammograms, 40% axillary ultrasound, 83% MRI, and 51% PET. Abnormal nodes on imaging were seen in 208 patients (52%); 128 had pre-NAC node biopsy, and 75 were positive. Overall, 28% of the patients (n = 111) were ypN+ post-NAC. Although the incidence of ypN+ was significantly higher in patients with abnormal nodes on pre-NAC imaging (p = 0.001), 54% did not require axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) post-NAC. Among the patients with normal nodes on pre-NAC imaging, 20% were ypN+ post-NAC. Half of patients with abnormal nodes on pre-NAC imaging did not require ALND post-NAC, while 20% of those with normal pre-NAC nodes had disease post-NAC, indicating that in cN0 patients already selected for NAC, axillary imaging pre-NAC does not predict the need for axillary surgery post-NAC with sufficient accuracy to be clinically useful.

There is an urgent need for reliable markers to identify patients whose prostate cancer (PCa) will recur after initial therapy and progress to lethal disease. Gleason score (GS) is considered the most accurate predictive marker for disease-specific mortality after primary treatment of localized PCa. Most PCas cluster into groups of GS 6 and 7 with considerable variation in the disease recurrence and disease-specific death. In preclinical PCa models, Stat5a/b promotes PCa growth and progression. Stat5a/b is critical for PCa cell viability in vitro and for tumor growth in vivo and promotes metastatic dissemination of cancer in nude mice. Here, we analyzed the predictive value of high nuclear Stat5a/b protein levels in 2 cohorts of PCas: Material I (n = 562) PCas treated by radical prostatectomy (RP), and Material II (n = 106) PCas treated by deferred palliative therapy. In intermediate GS PCas treated by radical prostatectomy, high levels of nuclear Stat5a/b predicted both early recurrence (univariable analysis; P < .0001, multivariable analysis; HR = 1.82, P = .017) and early PCa-specific death (univariable analysis; P = .028). In addition, high nuclear Stat5a/b predicted early disease recurrence in both univariable (P < .0001) and multivariable (HR = 1.61; P = .012) analysis in the entire cohort of patients treated by RP regardless of the GS. Patients treated by deferred palliative therapy, elevated nuclear Stat5a/b expression was associated with early PCa-specific death by univariable Cox regression analysis (HR = 1.59; 95% CI = [1.04, 2.44]; P = .034). If confirmed in future prospective studies, nuclear Stat5a/b may become a useful independent predictive marker of recurrence of lethal PCa after RP for intermediate GS PCas.

Breast-conserving therapy (BCT) and mastectomy result in equivalent long-term survival. Locoregional recurrence rates after BCT have decreased over time and are now similar to those after mastectomy. Contralateral breast cancer rates are declining as well owing to the widespread use of adjuvant systemic therapy. Despite these improved outcomes, increasing rates of bilateral mastectomy for unilateral cancer have been observed in the United States. Medical indications for mastectomy are well defined and present in a minority of patients, and women at increased risk for contralateral cancer are a small proportion of the breast cancer population. Evidence indicates that increasing use of mastectomy is a patient-driven trend that is most pronounced among younger, educated, and well-insured women, and reflects fear of recurrence and in some cases misunderstanding of future cancer risks. Although satisfaction levels are generally high among patients choosing contralateral prophylactic mastectomy, complications and procedure extent may be underestimated. Improved communication strategies are essential to facilitate this complex decision-making process.