Search

Abstract Background Postoperative pain is a common complication following surgery, with severity and duration varying between patients. Chronic postoperative pain after inguinal hernia surgery has an incidence rate of approximately 10%. Risk factors for acute and chronic pain following hernia surgery include age, sex, psychosocial factors, and demographic background. Additionally, genetic polymorphisms in enzymes involved in pain mechanisms, as well as the metabolism of analgesics might influence pain perception, pain development, and response to pain medications. Key enzymes include the catechol-o-methyltransferase (COMT), the µ-opioid receptor 1 (OPRM1), and the cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6). CYP2D6 plays a crucial role in metabolizing analgesics such as tramadol, codeine, and oxycodone. It is also suspected to be involved in the synthesis of catecholamines and endogenous morphines suggesting a potential role in pathophysiology of pain. We hypothesize that the CYP2D6 activity influences the development of postoperative pain after hernia surgery. Methods This study is a prospective, observational, multicenter association study investigating adult patients scheduled for inguinal hernia surgery using a robotic-assisted (rTAPP) approach. Patients are enrolled during the preoperative surgical consultation. A buccal swab is collected for genetic testing at this time. Pain at the site of the hernia is assessed using the validated EuraHSQoL score preoperatively and at 2, 4, and 6 weeks postoperatively. Additionally, information on co-medication and details of the surgery will be collected. The planned number of participants is 350 patients. The primary objective is to analyze the association between different genotype-predicted CYP2D6 phenotypes and patient-reported pain intensity 6 weeks after surgery. Secondary objectives include the association between further genetic variants, such as the COMT rs4680 and OPRM1 rs1799971 genotype, and pain severity. Additionally, the potential of pharmacogenetic panel testing to optimize analgesic therapy in hernia surgery patients will be explored. Discussion The findings of this study are expected to provide valuable insights into identifying patients at higher risk for postoperative pain before surgery. This knowledge could pave the way for tailored interventions during and after surgery for these specific patients. Trial registration Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien https://www.drks.de/DRKS00034796 Registered on August 07, 2024.

Abstract Background In clinical practice, family medication history is not routinely assessed as part of a patient’s family health history (FHH). The information is self-reported and can depend on the individual’s subjective perception. To illustrate how pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing results could be used to validate self-reported family medication history on drug-related problems (DRP), as well as to inform medication-related decisions, we herein present a case involving ten members of the same family. Case Presentation Prior to a planned surgery, a preemptive PGx panel test was performed for a nine-year-old girl due to self-reported family medication history. The PGx panel test was also performed for her three siblings, parents, and grandparents. The focus was directed to the paternal grandmother, as she reported DRP from the hypnotic agent propofol, and to the maternal grandmother, as she described DRP after the administration of codeine and tramadol. A commercial PGx panel test of 100 variations in 30 different genes was conducted and analyzed focusing on genetic variants in cytochrome P450 enzyme 2B6 (CYP2B6), and CYP2D6 as they are involved in the biotransformation of propofol and the bioactivation of codeine and tramadol, respectively. The girl was identified as (1) CYP2B6 intermediate metabolizer (IM) with reduced enzyme activity and (2) CYP2D6 poor metabolizer (PM) with no enzyme activity. Regarding the planned surgery, it was recommended (1) to carefully titrate propofol dosage with increased monitoring of potential DRP and (2) to avoid opioids whose activation is mediated by CYP2D6 (e.g. codeine and tramadol). Further PGx testing revealed (1) the paternal grandmother as CYP2B6 normal metabolizer (NM) and (2) the maternal grandmother as CYP2D6 NM. Conclusion The original trigger for PGx testing was the self-reported, conspicuous family medication history of DRP reported by the grandmothers. However, the girl’s genotype predicted phenotypes of CYP2B6 IM and CYP2D6 PM, differed from the grandmothers’. With this exemplary case, we propose that hereditary concerns based on self-reported information on DRP should be verified by a PGx panel test, when the respective drug exhibits a PGx association. Also, the girl’s PGx testing results provided important medication recommendations, which were considered perioperatively by the anesthetist suggesting to use PGx testing results preemptively to inform medication-related decisions.

Genetic predisposition is one factor influencing interindividual drug response. Pharmacogenetic information can be used to guide the selection and dosing of certain drugs. However, the implementation of pharmacogenetics (PGx) in clinical practice remains challenging. Defining a formal structure, as well as concrete procedures and clearly defined responsibilities, may facilitate and increase the use of PGx in clinical practice. Over 140 patient cases from an observational study in Switzerland formed the basis for the design and refinement of a pharmacist-led pharmacogenetics testing and counselling service (PGx service) in an interprofessional setting. Herein, we defined a six-step approach, including: (1) patient referral; (2) pre-test-counselling; (3) PGx testing; (4) medication review; (5) counselling; (6) follow-up. The six-step approach supports the importance of an interprofessional collaboration and the role of pharmacists in PGx testing and counselling across healthcare settings.