Search

Aim of the study:Erlotinib and gefitinib are reversible EGFR-TKI administered orally. Results of the phase III study JBR.21 proved the clinical efficacy of erlotinib-based regimens as second- or third-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. We analyze efficacy of treatment with erlotinib in patients suffering from advanced stage NSCLC who participated in the multicentre, international phase IV study ‐ MO 18109 TRUST (expanded access clinical program of Tarceva TM in patients with advanced stage IIIB/IV NSCLC). Our analysis was performed based on clinical data derived from centres with the largest number of patients who received erlotinib. Material and methods: Between May and November 2005, a total of 56 patients (19 women and 37 men) with histologic or cytologic diagnosis of NSCLC were included in the study. The histological diagnosis was: squamouscell ( n= 23), adenocarcinoma ( n= 20), broncho-alveolar carcinoma ( n= 2). In 11 patients the type of NSCLC was not specified. Results:Patients received erlotinib in a single dose of 150 mg per day. Partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) or progressive disease (PD) were observed in 5 (9%), 33 (59%) and 16 (29%) patients respectively. Median PFS was 16.0 weeks. In the study population adverse events (AE) were noted in 12 (21%) patients. Conclusions: Results of the TRUST study in the Polish population confirmed the efficacy of erlotinib in advanced NSCLC after failure of prior platinum-based chemotherapy. Treatment with erlotinib was associated with longer PFS as com pared to the JBR.2 study, whole TRUST study population and Italian population included in the TRUST study.

Introduction: Patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have a very poor prognosis. Individualization of treatment and identification of therapeutic molecular targets may improve outcomes. Gefitinib was introduced recently among several other molecular-targeted drugs of activity in NSCLC. Gefitinib is indicated for patients diagnosed with advanced or disseminated NSCLC with an activating mutation in the EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) gene. The paper summarize experience with gefitinib in the Department of Lung and Thoracic Tumors of Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute in Warsaw. Materials and methods: The group of 11 patients diagnosed with advanced NSCLC and activating mutations in the EGFR gene was analyzed. Patients were treated from April 2010 to April 2011. Tolerability, objective response rate (ORR) and progression free survival (PFS), which was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, were assessed. Results: Median observation time from the start of gefitinib treatment was 14 months (range 4,8–19 months). The rate of one-year survival in this group of patients was 91% (10 patients) with 54% of patients (6 patients) surviving one year without progression of disease. The ORR rate of 82% and median PFS 11.4 months were reached. No treatment-related deaths were reported. Among the complications skin toxicity (82%) and diarrhea (45%) were most frequently observed, in most cases the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) first grade. Conclusions: The results confirm the literature data on the efficacy and safety profile of gefitinib in the treatment of patients with the diagnosis of advanced NSCLC and activating mutation in the EGFR gene.

Background: Chemotherapy is the principal treatment method for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Treatment with platinum-based and novel chemotherapeutic regimens, compared to monotherapy, slightly increases the response rates to 20-40%. The predictive and prognostic values of molecular factors are highly variable; however, data on clinical-demographic factors are still burdened by significant limitations. Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of synaptophysin and chromogranin A protein expression in patients receiving palliative chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC. Methods: The study population consisted of 23 women and 116 men. The median age was 57.3 years. Expression of synaptophysin and chromogranin was assessed using a two-step model of immunohistochemical staining. Level 0 represented lack of activity, while level 1 represented its expression. Results: Expression of synaptophysin and chromogranin A was observed in 12 (8.6%) and 5 (3.6%) patients, respectively. The risk of death was significantly lower in patients with expression of synaptophysin (p = 0.008) and chromogranin A (p = 0.014). The 12- and 24-month survival rate of patients with synaptophysin expression was 64% (95% CI 0.35-0.93), while for patients without expression it was 46% (95% CI 0.36-0.56) and 16% (95% CI 0.07-0.25), respectively. The 12- and 24-month survival rate of patients with chromogranin expression was 80% (95% CI 0.44-1.00), while for chromogranin A-negative patients it was 47% (95% CI 0.37-0.57) and 19% (95% CI 0.10-0.28), respectively. We did not observe associations between expression of synaptophysin and chromogranin A and the other typical prognostic factors. Conclusions: Expression of synaptophysin and chromogranin A was associated with a longer median overall survival and might have prognostic value. These results should be confirmed in a prospective study.