Search

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a recognized adverse consequence associated with all Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors used to treat chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL); however, real-world time to discontinuation (TTD) and time to next treatment (TTNT) of CLL/SLL patients with a high baseline AF/stroke risk remain unknown.Patients with CLL/SLL from a nationwide electronic health record-derived database (February 12, 2013-January 31, 2021) initiating first-line (1L) or second or later-line (2L+) treatment with ibrutinib or other regimens on or after February 12, 2014 (index date) were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to assess TTD and TTNT among all patients, patients with high AF risk (CHARGE-AF risk score ≥10.0%), and patients at high risk of stroke (CHAIn 1L/2L+, 2190/1851 patients received ibrutinib and 4388/4135, were treated with other regimens. Median TTD for ibrutinib was similar regardless of AF/stroke-related risk (1L: all patients, 15.7 months; high AF risk, 11.7 months; high stroke risk, 13.7 months; similar results in 2L+). Median TTNT was significantly longer for ibrutinib vs. other regimens (1L: not reached vs. 45.9 months; 2L+: not reached vs. 23.6 months; both P.05), including among those with high AF/stroke risk. TTNT was similar between all patients and high-risk cohorts in 1L and 2L+ (all P.05).This study highlights that elevated baseline AF/stroke-related risk does not adversely impact TTD and TTNT outcomes associated with ibrutinib use. Additionally, TTNT was significantly longer for patients treated with ibrutinib vs. other regimens.

To assess the total cost of testing associated with next-generation sequencing (NGS) versus polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing strategies among patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) from a Medicare and US commercial payer’s perspective. A decision tree model considered testing for genomic alterations in EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, KRAS, MET, HER2, RET, NTRK1 among patients with newly diagnosed mNSCLC using (1) liquid or tissue biopsy NGS tests, (2) exclusionary mutation (KRAS) test followed by sequential PCR tests, (3) sequential PCR tests, or (4) hotspot panel PCR tests. The alteration test sequence followed clinical guideline recommendations. Inputs based on literature, expert opinion, or assumptions included prevalence of mNSCLC, proportion of patients using each testing strategy (50% NGS [90% tissue, 10% liquid], 10% exclusionary, 10% sequential, 30% hotspot), proportion testing positive for each genomic mutation, rebiopsy rates, and costs for testing and associated medical care. Time to appropriate targeted therapy initiation and total costs were calculated for NGS, each PCR testing strategy, and all PCR strategies combined. Among a hypothetical plan of 1,000,000 members (75% commercial, 25% Medicare), 1,119 patients were estimated to have mNSCLC and be eligible for testing. Estimated mean time to appropriate targeted therapy was 2 weeks for NGS and 6 weeks for PCR (sequential: 9 weeks, exclusionary: 8 weeks, hotspot: 3 weeks). Mean per patient costs were $4,932 for NGS and $6,605 for PCR (exclusionary: $5,563, sequential: $6,263, hotspot: $7,066). Per patient costs were higher from a commercial perspective (NGS: $6,225; PCR: $8,430) relative to Medicare (NGS: $2,099; PCR: $2,646); nevertheless, NGS was the least costly testing strategy across plan types. NGS was associated with the fastest time to appropriate targeted therapy initiation and lowest total cost of testing compared to PCR testing strategies for newly diagnosed patients with mNSCLC.

80 Background: Several recurrent mutations that interfere with the HRR DNA damage signaling response pathway have been recently identified as novel biomarkers that may help optimize treatment for patients with mCRPC. There is limited real-world information on clinical outcomes, including TTNT and OS, among patients with mCRPC who initiate 1L, overall and by HRR mutation status in the United States. Methods: This study used the nationwide (de-identified) Flatiron Health – Foundation Medicine Inc. (FMI) Metastatic Prostate Cancer Clinico-Genomic Database (1/1/2011–12/31/2021). The de-identified data originated from approximately 280 US cancer clinics (~800 care sites). Patients who initiated 1L therapy (index date) on or after mCRPC diagnosis and had ≥1 HRR mutation test any time prior to or on the index date were included. Patients were excluded if they initiated a clinical trial drug in 1L or had

Background Once-daily oral tenofovir-based combinations as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) have shown to be an effective biomedical HIV prevention strategy for populations at-risk of acquiring HIV-1. However, low adherence can lead to poor effectiveness. This study described the characteristics of commercially-insured US PrEP users. Methods This retrospective study used IQVIA™ PharMetrics Plus data (1/1/2015–3/31/2020) to identify adults newly initiated (index date) on emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (FTC/TDF) or emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (FTC/TAF) as daily PrEP. Users had ≥6 months of continuous enrollment pre-index (baseline); those diagnosed with HIV or with antiretroviral therapy (ART) use during baseline were excluded. User characteristics were described during the baseline period. For FTC/TDF users, proportion of days covered (PDC), persistence, treatment breaks, and switching were described during the follow-up period, which spanned from index to the earliest of disenrollment or end of data. Non-persistence was defined as a >90-day gap from last day of supply, with re-initiation after this gap indicating treatment break. For PDC and persistence, follow-up was censored at HIV infection, defined by both multi-class ART initiation and HIV diagnosis. Results In total 24,232 FTC/TDF and 1,187 FTC/TAF users were identified. Overall, mean age was 35.1 years and 94.5% were male (Table 1). Mean [median] length of follow-up was longer for FTC/TDF (504 [390] days) than FTC/TDF users (77 [70] days). On average, FTC/TDF users had 9.0 dispensings with 38.3 days of supply per dispensing over follow-up; 11.1% had ≥1 treatment break (mean length, 249 days). Among those initiated on FTC/TDF, 10.8% switched to FTC/TAF. The mean PDC for FTC/TDF users at 6 and 12 months was 0.74 and 0.67, respectively, corresponding to 63.7% and 57.9% of patients with PDC ≥0.70 (Figure 1). Persistence to FTC/TDF at 6 and 12 months was 70.2% and 57.4%, respectively (Figure 2). Table 1. Baseline Demographics and Clinical Characteristics of PrEP Users by Regimen Figure 1. Proportion of Days Covered of FTC/TDF Users Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier Persistence Rates of FTC/TDF Users Conclusion Patient characteristics of PrEP users are broadly similar between regimens, though switching from FTC/TDF to FTC/TAF is common. FTC/TDF users had lower real-world PDC and persistence than in recent clinical trials (DISCOVER and HPTN 083). Disclosures Alan Oglesby, MPH, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) (Employee, Shareholder) Guillaume Germain, MSc, ViiV Healthcare (Other Financial or Material Support, I am an employee of Groupe d’analyse, Ltée, a consulting company that provided paid consulting services to ViiV Healthcare for the conduct of the present study.) Francois Laliberte, MA, Viiv (Research Grant or Support) Staci Bush, NP, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) (Employee, Shareholder) Heidi Swygard, MD, ViiV Healthcare (Employee) Sean MacKnight, MScPH, Analysis Group (Employee) Annalise Hilts, BA, Analysis Group, Inc. (Employee) Mei Sheng Duh, MPH, ScD, ViiV Healthcare (Grant/Research Support)