Search

Background: Triple Negative Breast Cancers (TNBC) are a biologically diverse and aggressive subgroup lacking targeted therapy. Germline BRCA (gBRCA) breast cancer and TNBC share some phenotypic and molecular similarities, with 10%-20% of TNBC patients having gBRCA mutations. Homologous recombination deficient tumours are particularly sensitive to PARP inhibitors such as olaparib (Lynparza). It has been shown that adjuvant olaparib for patients with high-risk, HER2-negative early breast cancer and gBRCA pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants after adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly improves 3-year invasive and distant disease-free survival compared to placebo (OlympiA). Aim: To establish if the addition of olaparib to neoadjuvant platinum based chemotherapy for basal TNBC and/or gBRCA breast cancer is safe and improves efficacy (pathological complete response (pCR) rate). Trial design: 3-stage open label randomised phase II/III trial of neoadjuvant paclitaxel and carboplatin +/- olaparib, followed by clinicians' choice of anthracycline regimen. Stage 1 and 2: Randomisation (1:1:1) to either control (3 weekly carboplatin AUC5/weekly paclitaxel 80mg/m2 for 4 cycles) or one of two research arms with the same chemotherapy regimen but with two different schedules of olaparib 150mg BD for 12 days. Stage 3: Randomisation (1:1) to either control arm or to the research arm selected in stage 2. End-points: Stage 1: Safety; Stage 2: Schedule selection using pCR rate and completion rate of olaparib using a “pick-the-winner” design. Stage 3: pCR rate. This trial includes an optional pathway (PARTNERING) aiming to establish if the addition of new agents (ATR inhibitor and PDL1 inhibitor) can improve response in those patients with evidence of residual disease before surgery. Eligibility criteria: Aged 16-70; histologically confirmed invasive breast cancer; ER-negative, HER2-negative with TNBC basal phenotype or gBRCA positive, HER2-negative irrespective of hormone status; clinical stage T1-4 N0-2; performance status 0-1; treatment commenced within 6 weeks of diagnostic biopsy; biomarker scores: TILs, CK 5/6, EGFR +/- AR. Statistical methods: The recruitment of TNBC non-gBRCA and gBRCA patients is independent. Enrichment design is applied with an overall significance level 0.05(α) and 80% power. A minimum of 780 patients will be included to detect an absolute improvement of 15% (all patients and the TNBC non-gBRCA cohort) and 20% (gBRCA patients) by adding olaparib to platinum based chemotherapy. It is planned to recruit a minimum of 188 gBRCA patients. A maximum of 15 patients will be allocated into each PARTNERING cohort. Present accrual: Recruitment commenced 27 May 2016 and 678 patients from 30 sites have been accrued to date. The IDSMC reviewed the trial after Stages 1 and 2 and recommended to continue the trial without change. Data analysis for Stage 2 revealed no safety concerns and research arm 2 (olaparib on day 3 to day 14) was selected. Stage 3 Phase I recruitment is in progress (recruiting TNBC non-gBRCA and gBRCA patients) and we anticipate moving to Phase II (recruiting gBRCA patients only) by early 2022. Four patients have been accrued to the PARTNERING optional pathway to date. The trial is open and enrolling patients to UK and international sites. Contact information: partner@addenbrookes.nhs.uk Citation Format: Lynsey M Drewett, Karen A Pinilla, Louise Grybowicz, Jerome Wulff, Alimu Dayimu, Nikolaos Demiris, Jessica Martin, Camila Maida de Pontes, Nicola Johnson, Caron Harvey, Erdem Demir, Kimberley St John Green, James Jones, Gemma Young, Anne-Laure Vallier, Wendi Qian, Andrea Machin, Karen McAdam, Rebecca Roylance, Ellen R Copson, Anne Armstrong, Nicola Levitt, Elena Provenzano, Marc Tischkowitz, Emma McMurtry, Helena Earl, Jean E Abraham. PARTNER: Randomised, phase II/III trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the addition of olaparib to platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple negative and/or germline BRCA mutated breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-24-01.

Purpose: Associations between taxane-related sensory neuropathy (TRSN) and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) have previously been reported, but few have been replicated in large, independent validation studies. This study evaluates the association between previously investigated SNPs and TRSN, using genotype data from a study of chemotherapy-related toxicity in patients with breast cancer.Experimental Design: We investigated 73 SNPs in 50 genes for their contribution to TRSN risk, using genotype data from 1,303 European patients. TRSN was assessed using National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria for adverse events classification. Unconditional logistic regression evaluated the association between each SNP and TRSN risk (primary analysis). Cox regression analysis assessed the association between each SNP and cumulative taxane dose causing the first reported moderate/severe TRSN (secondary analysis). The admixture likelihood (AML) test, which considers all SNPs with a prior probability of association with TRSN together, tested the hypothesis that certain SNPs are truly associated.Results: The AML test provided strong evidence for the association of some SNPs with TRSN (P = 0.023). The two most significantly associated SNPs were rs3213619(ABCB1) [OR = 0.47; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.28–0.79; P = 0.004] and rs9501929(TUBB2A) (OR = 1.80; 95% CI, 1.20–2.72; P = 0.005). A further 9 SNPs were significant at P-value ≤ 0.05.Conclusion: This is currently the largest study investigating SNPs associated with TRSN. We found strong evidence that SNPs within genes in taxane pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic pathways contribute to TRSN risk. However, a large proportion of the inter-individual variability in TRSN remains unexplained. Further validated results from GWAS will help to identify new pathways, genes, and SNPs involved in TRSN susceptibility. Clin Cancer Res; 20(9); 2466–75. ©2014 AACR.

PDF file - 237KB, Supplementary Table 1: Published Studies of Putative Functional SNPs Supplementary Table 2a: Drug Regimens and Doses of Taxanes by Study Supplementary Table 2b: Comparison of Toxicity grades/rates by recruiting trial in PGSNPS included in Taxane Related Sensory Neuropathy Study Supplementary Table 3: PGSNPS Taxane Treated Patient Characteristics Supplementary Table 4: All Putative Functional SNPs Replicated in the PGSNPS dataset (phenotype: cumulative dose to TRSN) Supplementary Table 5: All Putative Functional SNPs Replicated in the PGSNPS dataset (phenotype: maximum TRSN) Supplementary Figure 1: Percentage of Patients with TRSN ≥ grade 2 by genotype, for three statistically significant SNPs that were genotyped in PGSNPS (maximum TRSN) Supplementary Figures 2a-c: Kaplan-Meier curves Kaplan-Meier curves: Shows for each SNP, by genotype, the probability of TRSN grade 0-1 (i.e., the probability of not experiencing moderate/severe TRSN) as the cumulative dose increases.

Pharmacokinetics: Z-endoxifen levels per taselisib dose level

Purpose:The strategy of combining endocrine therapy with PI3K-mTOR inhibition has shown promise in estrogen receptor (ER)–positive breast cancer, but new agents and combinations with a better therapeutic index are urgently needed. Taselisib is a potent, selective, beta-isoform–sparing PI3 kinase inhibitor.Patients and Methods:30 patients with ER-positive, metastatic breast cancer who had failed prior endocrine therapy were treated with escalating doses of taselisib (2 or 4 mg in an intermittent or continuous schedule) combined with tamoxifen 20 mg once daily in this phase 1b study using a “rolling six” design.Results:Taselisib combined with tamoxifen was generally well tolerated, with treatment-emergent adverse events as expected for this class of drugs, including diarrhea (13 patients, 43%), mucositis (10 patients, 33%), and hyperglycemia (8 patients, 27%). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Objective responses were seen in 6 of 25 patients with RECIST-measurable disease (ORR 24%). Median time to disease progression was 3.7 months. Twelve of 30 patients (40%) had disease control for 6 months or more. Circulating tumor (ct)DNA studies using next-generation tagged amplicon sequencing identified early indications of treatment response and mechanistically relevant correlates of clinical drug resistance (e.g., mutations in KRAS, ERBB2) in some patients.Conclusions:Taselisib can be safely combined with tamoxifen at the recommended phase 2 dose of 4 mg given once daily on a continuous schedule. Preliminary evidence of antitumor activity was seen in both PIK3CA mutant and wild-type cancers. The randomized phase 2 part of POSEIDON (testing tamoxifen plus taselisib or placebo) is currently recruiting.

Supplementary Methods Text

Background: Triple negative breast cancers (TNBCs) are an aggressive and diverse subgroup with no specific targeted therapies currently available. Basal TNBCs show some phenotypic and molecular similarities with germline BRCA mutated BC (gBRCA). In gBRCA patients, and potentially other homologous recombination deficiencies, these already compromised pathways may allow PARP inhibitors (olaparib) to work more effectively. PARTNER was designed to establish if the addition of olaparib to neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy for gBRCA and/or basal TNBC is safe and improves efficacy (pathological complete response (pCR)). This is the first time a clinical trial provides safety data of the combination of olaparib with platinum and taxane chemotherapy in an early breast cancer setting. Methods: PARTNER is a 3-stage open label randomised Phase II/III trial of neoadjuvant Carboplatin AUC5 with weekly Paclitaxel 80mg/m2 (CP) +/- olaparib (O) 150mgBD for 12 days x 4 cycles, followed by clinicians' choice of anthracycline regimen x 3 cycles. Basal-TNBC and/or gBRCA patients are eligible for inclusion. Primary endpoints are defined by stage: Stage 1 - Safety, Stage2 - Schedule selection, and Stage 3 - Efficacy (pCR rate). The trial is now powered for efficacy analysis in the BRCA and non-BRCA population independently. Stage 1 and 2 randomization was(1:1:1) to CP: CP + O from day (D) -2: or CP + O from D 3. G-CSF was mandatory during the first 4 cycles of treatment. We present a pooled-safety analysis from Stage 1 and 2 of the two research arms only. Recruitment continues into Stage 3. Results: Between June 2016 and April 2018, 159 patients were recruited among the three arms. Overall, median age was 48.2 [range 22.3- 70.9]; 12% had Tumours >5cm, 34% had Axillary involvement; 17% were gBRCA. Adverse events (AE) that were reported as common (in at least 10% of patients) were Anaemia 23%, Neutropenia 18% and Infection 10%. Fatigue and Diarrhoea were next most prevalent with 9% and 6% respectively. The most common AE Grade >=3 were haematological events. These include Neutropenia 19%, Anaemia 15%, and Thrombocytopenia 5%. Febrile Neutropenia and Haemorrhage were reported in only 2% and 1% of cases. Grade 3 Non- haematological events were Fatigue 7%, Hypertension 3%, Headache 3% and Diarrhoea 2%. Grade 3 Sensory neuropathy was present in 2% of patients. No grade 4 sensory or motor neuropathy events were described. Serious adverse reactions related to investigational regimen were reported in 17% of patients and include fever and infection with 8 and 4 events respectively. No toxicity related deaths were reported. As per July 8th 2019, 373 patients have been recruited from which 58 were gBRCA. Conclusions: Combinations of olaparib with neoadjuvant CP chemotherapy showed an acceptable and manageable toxicity profile. Although haematological events were the most common, they did not exceed historical frequencies reported for standard chemotherapy regimens. Final safety analysis will be performed once recruitment is complete and will include detailed long-term neuropathy data. Citation Format: Karen Pinilla Alba, Emma McMurtry, Anne-Laure Vallier, Louise Grybowicz, Ellen Copson, Anne Armstrong, Rebecca Roylance, Wendi Qian, Nikolaos Demiris, Stanly Thomas, Caron Harvey, Luke Hughes-Davies, Karen McAdam, Paula del Rosario, Bryony Harrop, Elena Provenzano, Marc Tischkowitz, Helena M Earl, Jean E Abraham. Preliminary safety data from stage 1 and 2 of the phase II/III PARTNER trial: Addition of olaparib to platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple negative and/or germline BRCA mutated breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-10-05.

Rapid COVID-19 diagnosis in the hospital is essential, although this is complicated by 30%–50% of nose/throat swabs being negative by SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT). Furthermore, the D614G spike mutant dominates the pandemic and it is unclear how serological tests designed to detect anti-spike antibodies perform against this variant. We assess the diagnostic accuracy of combined rapid antibody point of care (POC) and nucleic acid assays for suspected COVID-19 disease due to either wild-type or the D614G spike mutant SARS-CoV-2. The overall detection rate for COVID-19 is 79.2% (95% CI 57.8–92.9) by rapid NAAT alone. The combined point of care antibody test and rapid NAAT is not affected by D614G and results in very high sensitivity for COVID-19 diagnosis with very high specificity., Graphical Abstract, Highlights Combined rapid antibody + nucleic acid detection correctly diagnoses SARS-CoV-2 Rapid antibody tests detect immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 bearing D614G Rapid SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests do not cross-react with antibodies to seasonal CoV False positivity in SARS-CoV-2 finger prick blood antibody tests can be very low, Mlcochova et al. report that combined rapid nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) and finger prick blood antibody tests can substantially improve the diagnosis of COVID-19 as compared to NAAT alone and is able to detect the SARS-CoV-2 Spike D614G variant that dominates the pandemic.

Purpose: The strategy of combining endocrine therapy with PI3K-mTOR inhibition has shown promise in estrogen receptor (ER)–positive breast cancer, but new agents and combinations with a better therapeutic index are urgently needed. Taselisib is a potent, selective, beta-isoform–sparing PI3 kinase inhibitor. Patients and Methods: 30 patients with ER-positive, metastatic breast cancer who had failed prior endocrine therapy were treated with escalating doses of taselisib (2 or 4 mg in an intermittent or continuous schedule) combined with tamoxifen 20 mg once daily in this phase 1b study using a “rolling six” design. Results: Taselisib combined with tamoxifen was generally well tolerated, with treatment-emergent adverse events as expected for this class of drugs, including diarrhea (13 patients, 43%), mucositis (10 patients, 33%), and hyperglycemia (8 patients, 27%). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Objective responses were seen in 6 of 25 patients with RECIST-measurable disease (ORR 24%). Median time to disease progression was 3.7 months. Twelve of 30 patients (40%) had disease control for 6 months or more. Circulating tumor (ct)DNA studies using next-generation tagged amplicon sequencing identified early indications of treatment response and mechanistically relevant correlates of clinical drug resistance (e.g., mutations in KRAS, ERBB2) in some patients. Conclusions: Taselisib can be safely combined with tamoxifen at the recommended phase 2 dose of 4 mg given once daily on a continuous schedule. Preliminary evidence of antitumor activity was seen in both PIK3CA mutant and wild-type cancers. The randomized phase 2 part of POSEIDON (testing tamoxifen plus taselisib or placebo) is currently recruiting.

Background The addition of adjuvant trastuzumab to chemotherapy has significantly improved outcomes in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive early, potentially curable breast cancer. Twelve months��� trastuzumab tested in the registration trials was adopted for standard adjuvant treatment in 2006. Subsequently similar outcomes were demonstrated using 9 weeks trastuzumab. Shorter durations were therefore tested for non-inferiority. Objectives To establish whether 6 months��� adjuvant trastuzumab is non-inferior to 12 months in HER2-positive early breast cancer using a primary endpoint of 4-year disease-free-survival (DFS). Design Phase III randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Setting 152 NHS Hospitals. Participants 4088 patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer planned to receive both chemotherapy and trastuzumab. Intervention Randomisation (1:1) between six months��� or twelve months��� trastuzumab. Main outcomes Primary endpoint was DFS four years after diagnosis. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), cost effectiveness, and cardiac function during trastuzumab. Assuming a 4-year DFS rate of 80% with 12 months, 4000 patients were required to demonstrate non-inferiority of 6-months (5% 1-sided significance, 85% power), defining the non-inferiority limit as no worse than 3% below the standard arm. Costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated by within-trial analysis and a lifetime decision-analytic model. Results Between 4th October 2007 and 31st July 2015, 2045 patients were randomised to 12-months��� trastuzumab and 2043 to 6-months. Sixty-nine percent had ER-positive disease; 90% received anthracyclines (49% with taxanes; 41% without taxanes); 10% received taxanes without anthracyclines; 54% had trastuzumab sequentially after chemotherapy; 85% received adjuvant chemotherapy (58% were node negative). At 6.1 years median follow-up with 389 (10%) deaths, and 566 (14%) DFS events, 4-year DFS rates for the 4088 patients were 89.5% (95% CI, 88.1-90.8) in the 6-month group and 90.3% (95% CI 88.9- 91.5) in the 12-month group (Hazard Ratio 1.10; 90% CI 0.96���1.26, non-inferiority p=0.01), demonstrating non-inferiority of 6-months��� trastuzumab. Congruent results were found for OS (non-inferiority p=0.0003), and landmark analyses 6 months from starting trastuzumab (non-inferiority p=0.03 (DFS) and p=0.006 (OS)). 6-months��� trastuzumab resulted in fewer patients reporting adverse events of severe grade (365/1929 (19%) versus 460/1935 (24%) 12-month patients, p=0.0003) or stopping early because of cardiotoxicity (61/1977 (3%) versus 146/1941 (8%) 12-month patients, p, National Institute for Health Research, Health Technology Assessment Programme (HTA Project: 06/303/98).

Background: Adjuvant trastuzumab significantly improves outcomes for patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer. The standard treatment duration is 12 months but shorter treatment could provide similar efficacy while reducing toxicities and cost. We aimed to investigate whether 6-month adjuvant trastuzumab treatment is non-inferior to the standard 12-month treatment regarding disease-free survival.Methods: This study is an open-label, randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Patients were recruited from 152 centres in the UK. We randomly assigned patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer, aged 18 years or older, and with a clear indication for chemotherapy, by a computerised minimisation process (1:1), to receive either 6-month or 12-month trastuzumab delivered every 3 weeks intravenously (loading dose of 8 mg/kg followed by maintenance doses of 6 mg/kg) or subcutaneously (600 mg), given in combination with chemotherapy (concurrently or sequentially). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival, analysed by intention to treat, with a non-inferiority margin of 3% for 4-year disease-free survival. Safety was analysed in all patients who received trastuzumab. This trial is registered with EudraCT (number 2006–007018–39), ISRCTN (number 52968807), and ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT00712140).Findings: Between Oct 4, 2007, and July 31, 2015, 2045 patients were assigned to 12-month trastuzumab treatment and 2044 to 6-month treatment (one patient was excluded because they were double randomised). Median follow-up was 5·4 years (IQR 3·6–6·7) for both treatment groups, during which a disease-free survival event occurred in 265 (13%) of 2043 patients in the 6-month group and 247 (12%) of 2045 patients in the 12-month group. 4-year disease-free survival was 89·4% (95% CI 87·9–90·7) in the 6-month group and 89·8% (88·3–91·1) in the 12-month group (hazard ratio 1·07 [90% CI 0·93–1·24], non-inferiority p=0·011), showing non-inferiority of the 6-month treatment. 6-month trastuzumab treatment resulted in fewer patients reporting severe adverse events (373 [19%] of 1939 patients vs 459 [24%] of 1894 patients, p=0·0002) or stopping early because of cardiotoxicity (61 [3%] of 1939 patients vs 146 [8%] of 1894 patients, pInterpretation: We have shown that 6-month trastuzumab treatment is non-inferior to 12-month treatment in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer, with less cardiotoxicity and fewer severe adverse events. These results support consideration of reduced duration trastuzumab for women at similar risk of recurrence as to those included in the trial.Funding: UK National Institute for Health Research, Health Technology Assessment Programme.

Background: In patients with TNBC, following standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy, residual disease (RD) is correlated with poor prognosis and 50% relapse within 5 years [1]. PARTNER is a neoadjuvant clinical trial which randomises TNBC and gBRCAm patients to carboplatin and paclitaxel +/- olaparib followed by anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Patients with RD after neoadjuvant treatment in this trial also face poorer survival outcomes, due to the paucity of treatment options. PARTNERING, develops a new strategy using novel agent combinations as an alternative pathway for patients with RD within the PARTNER trial. Methods: PARTNERING is a phase II open label, sub-study with a two-stage Simon design with biomarker guided treatment cohorts open only to patients in the PARTNER trial. A maximum of 15 patients will be included in each cohort. Patients with RD > 10% tumour cellularity (TC) on biopsy after neoadjuvant therapy will be eligible. Patients who have no tumour cells or < 10% TC, and those with progressive disease will be excluded. Allocation of patients into the cohorts will be based on tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) expression either on diagnostic or post treatment biopsy. Patients with tumours with TILs score ≤20% are considered “non-immunogenic” They will be stratified according to HRD status and allocated to receive a cell cycle checkpoint inhibitor + olaparib. Patients with a TILs score >20% are considered “immunogenic” and will be allocated to receive an immune checkpoint inhibitor with olaparib or a cell cycle checkpoint inhibitor. Primary outcome measure is pCR / MRD rate at surgery after the administration of 2 cycles / 8 weeks of a combination of new agents. The rate of conversion to pCR/MRD will be correlated with TC, TILs, BRCA and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status, Ki67% and previous olaparib treatment. Progress: The PARTNERING pathway in the PARTNER trial will be open late 2018. Citation Format: Abraham JE, Vallier A-L, Qian W, Machin A, Grybowicz L, Thomas S, Weiss M, Harvey C, McAdam K, Hughes-Davies L, Roberts A, Provenzano E, Pinilla K, Roylance R, Copson E, Armstrong A, McMurtry E, Tischkowitz M, Earl HM. PARTNERING / PARTNER : Phase II sub-study to establish if the addition of combinations of new agents (olaparib, cell cycle and immune checkpoint inhibitors) can improve the rate of pathological complete response (pCR) and minimal residual disease (MRD) in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and / or germline BRCA mutated (gBRCAm) patients with evidence of residual disease after PARTNER therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-01-02.

Background: Neo-tAnGo, a National Cancer Research Network (NCRN) multicentre randomised neoadjuvant chemotherapy trial in early breast cancer, enroled 831 patients in the United Kingdom. We report a central review of post-chemotherapy histopathology reports on the surgical specimens, to assess the presence and degree of response.\ud Methods: A central independent two-reader review (EP and HME) of histopathology reports from post-treatment surgical specimens was performed. The quality and completeness of pathology reporting across all centres was assessed. The reviews included pathological response to chemotherapy (pathological complete response (pCR); minimal residual disease (MRD); and lesser degrees of response), laterality, the number of axillary metastases and axillary nodes, and the type of surgery. A consensus was reached after discussion.\ud Results: In all, 825 surgical reports from 816 patients were available for review. Out of 4125 data items there were 347 discrepant results (8.4% of classifications), which involved 281 patients. These involved grading of breast response (169 but only 9 involving pCR vs MRD); laterality (6); presence of axillary metastasis (35); lymph node counts (108); and type of axillary surgery (29). Excluding cases with pCR, only 45% of reports included any comment regarding response in the breast and 30% in the axillary lymph nodes.\ud Conclusion: We found considerable variability in the completeness of reporting of surgical specimens within this national neoadjuvant breast cancer trial. This highlights the need for consensus guidelines among trial groups on histopathology reporting, and the participation of histopathologists throughout the development and analysis of neoadjuvant trials.\ud

The ARTemis Trial tested standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy±bevacizumab in the treatment of HER2-negative early breast cancer. We compare data from central pathology review with report review and also the reporting behavior of the two central pathologists. Eight hundred women with HER2-negative early invasive breast cancer were recruited. Response to chemotherapy was assessed from local pathology reports for pathological complete response in breast and axillary lymph nodes. Sections from the original core biopsy and surgical excision were centrally reviewed by one of two trial pathologists blinded to the local pathology reports. Pathologists recorded response to chemotherapy descriptively and also calculated residual cancer burden. 10% of cases were double-reported to compare the central pathologists’ reporting behavior. Full sample retrieval was obtained for 681 of the 781 patients (87%) who underwent surgery within the trial and were evaluable for pathological complete response. Four hundred and eighty-three (71%) were assessed by JSJT, and 198 (29%) were assessed by EP. Residual cancer burden calculations were possible in 587/681 (86%) of the centrally reviewed patients, as 94/681 (14%) had positive sentinel nodes removed before neoadjuvant chemotherapy invalidating residual cancer burden scoring. Good concordance was found between the two pathologists for residual cancer burden classes within the 65-patient quality assurance exercise (kappa 0.63 (95% CI: 0.57–0.69)). Similar results were obtained for the between-treatment arm comparison both from the report review and the central pathology review. For pathological complete response, report review was as good as central pathology review but for minimal residual disease, report review overestimated the extent of residual disease. In the ARTemis Trial central pathology review added little in the determination of pathological complete response but had a role in evaluating low levels of residual disease. Calculation of residual cancer burden was a simple and reproducible method of quantifying response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy as demonstrated by performance comparison of the two pathologists.

Background The relationship between chemotherapy-related toxicities and prognosis is unclear. Previous studies have examined the association of myelosuppression parameters or neuropathy with survival and reported conflicting results. This study aims to investigate 13 common chemotherapy toxicities and their association with relapse-free survival and breast cancer-specific survival. Methods Chemotherapy-related toxicities were collected prospectively for 6,248 women with early-stage breast cancer from four randomised controlled trials (NEAT; BR9601; tAnGo; Neo-tAnGo). Cox proportional-hazards modelling was used to analyse the association between chemotherapy-related toxicities and both breast cancer-specific survival and relapse-free survival. Models included important prognostic factors and stratified by variables violating the proportional hazards assumption. Results Multivariable analysis identified severe neutropenia (grades ≥3) as an independent predictor of relapse-free survival (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.86; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.76–0.97; P = 0.02). A similar trend was seen for breast cancer-specific survival (HR = 0.87; 95 % CI, 0.75–1.01; P = 0.06). Normal/low BMI patients experienced more severe neutropenia (P = 0.008) than patients with higher BMI. Patients with fatigue (grades ≥3) showed a trend towards reduced survival (breast cancer-specific survival: HR = 1.17; 95 % CI, 0.99–1.37; P = 0.06). In the NEAT/BR9601 sub-group analysis by treatment component, this effect was statistically significant (HR = 1.61; 95 % CI, 1.13–2.30; P = 0.009). Conclusions This large study shows a significant association between chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and increased survival. It also identifies a strong relationship between low/normal BMI and increased incidence of severe neutropenia. It provides evidence to support the development of neutropenia-adapted clinical trials to investigate optimal dose calculation and its impact on clinical outcome. This is important in populations where obesity may lead to sub-optimal chemotherapy doses. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0547-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models for all 15 image metrics. (DOCX 16Â kb)

Distribution of median lymphocyte density from pre-treatment biopsies by clinical variables. Horizontal gray lines represent median values. Results of Kruskal-Wallis tests are depicted within graphs; red text denotes p values

Distribution of post-treatment sample image metrics by tumor molecular subtype. Horizontal gray lines represent median values. Results of Kruskal-Wallis tests are depicted within graphs; red text denotes p values

Multivariate logistic regression model including clinical prognostic factors and image metrics derived from model depicted in Additional File 8. (DOCX 14Â kb)

Histograms depicting the distribution of all image metrics from pre-treatment samples. (PDF 25Â kb)

Correlation matrix of all image metrics from pre-treatment samples. Correlation matrix of 15 image metrics derived from pre-treatment biopsies. Correlations are Pearsonâ s coefficients. Text size is proportional to the strength of the correlation. Pink boxes denote positive correlations and blue boxes denote negative correlations. (PDF 82Â kb)

Correlation matrix of all image metrics from post-treatment surgical samples. Correlation matrix of 15 image metrics derived from post-treatment surgical samples. Correlations are Pearsonâ s coefficients. Text size is proportional to the strength of the correlation. Pink boxes denote positive correlations and those blue boxes denote negative correlations. (PDF 82Â kb)

CONSORT diagram illustrating the flow of patients at each analytical stage. (PDF 7Â kb)

Histograms depicting the distribution of all image metrics from post-treatment surgical samples. (PDF 26Â kb)

e22101Background: PERSEPHONE is a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial comparing 6 months of trastuzumab to the standard 12 months in patients with HER2 positive early breast cancer. An impo...

506Background: Adjuvant trastuzumab has significantly improved outcomes for HER2+ EBC pts, using the 12m duration empirically adopted from the pivotal registration trials. A shorter duration could reduce toxicities and cost whilst providing similar efficacy. No reduced-duration trial to date has demonstrated non-inferiority. Methods: PERSEPHONE is a randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial comparing 6 to 12m trastuzumab, the largest reduced-duration non-inferiority trial internationally. Mapping onto standard UK practice, all HER2+ EBC pts were eligible. Stratification is by ER status, chemotherapy (CT) type, and CT and trastuzumab timing. The primary endpoint is DFS from diagnosis (first relapse or death from any cause). Randomising 4000 pts (1:1) enabled the trial to assess the non-inferiority of 6m (5% 1-sided significance, 85% power), defining non-inferiority as ‘no worse than 3%’ below the 12m arm’s assumed 80% 4-yr DFS. The pre-planned definitive DFS analysis required 500 events. Results: 4089 pts w...

Background: The ARTemis trial was developed to assess the efficacy and safety of adding bevacizumab to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-negative early breast cancer.Methods: In this randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial, we enrolled women (≥18 years) with newly diagnosed HER2-negative early invasive breast cancer (radiological tumour size >20 mm, with or without axillary involvement), at 66 centres in the UK. Patients were randomly assigned via a central computerised minimisation procedure to three cycles of docetaxel (100 mg/m2 once every 21 days) followed by three cycles of fluorouracil (500 mg/m2), epirubicin (100 mg/m2), and cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2) once every 21 days (D-FEC), without or with four cycles of bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) (Bev+D-FEC). The primary endpoint was pathological complete response, defined as the absence of invasive disease in the breast and axillary lymph nodes, analysed by intention to treat. The trial has completed and follow-up is ongoing. This trial is registered with EudraCT (2008-002322-11), ISRCTN (68502941), and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01093235).Findings: Between May 7, 2009, and Jan 9, 2013, we randomly allocated 800 participants to D-FEC (n=401) and Bev+D-FEC (n=399). 781 patients were available for the primary endpoint analysis. Significantly more patients in the bevacizumab group achieved a pathological complete response compared with those treated with chemotherapy alone: 87 (22%, 95% CI 18–27) of 388 patients in the Bev+D-FEC group compared with 66 (17%, 13–21) of 393 patients in the D-FEC group (p=0·03). Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were reported at expected levels in both groups, although more patients had grade 4 neutropenia in the Bev+D-FEC group than in the D-FEC group (85 [22%] vs 68 [17%]).Interpretation: Addition of four cycles of bevacizumab to D-FEC in HER2-negative early breast cancer significantly improved pathological complete response. However, whether the improvement in pathological complete response will lead to improved disease-free and overall survival outcomes is unknown and will be reported after longer follow-up. Meta-analysis of available neoadjuvant trials is likely to be the only way to define subgroups of early breast cancer that would have clinically significant long-term benefit from bevacizumab treatment.Funding: Cancer Research UK, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis.

BACKGROUND: Response to treatments is highly heterogeneous in cancer. Increased availability of biomarkers and targeted treatments has led to the need for trial designs that efficiently test new treatments in biomarker-stratified patient subgroups. METHODS: We propose a novel Bayesian adaptive randomisation (BAR) design for use in multi-arm phase II trials where biomarkers exist that are potentially predictive of a linked treatment's effect. The design is motivated in part by two phase II trials that are currently in development. The design starts by randomising patients to the control treatment or to experimental treatments that the biomarker profile suggests should be active. At interim analyses, data from treated patients are used to update the allocation probabilities. If the linked treatments are effective, the allocation remains high; if ineffective, the allocation changes over the course of the trial to unlinked treatments that are more effective. RESULTS: Our proposed design has high power to detect treatment effects if the pairings of treatment with biomarker are correct, but also performs well when alternative pairings are true. The design is consistently more powerful than parallel-groups stratified trials. CONCLUSIONS: This BAR design is a powerful approach to use when there are pairings of biomarkers with treatments available for testing simultaneously.

Patient characteristics of the 6,248 patients shown by trial. Table S2. National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 2. Table S3. Case-control classification method for the 13 CRTs investigated. Table S4. Neutropenia and fatigue in relation to outcome, split by different treatment components. Figure S1. Trial objectives, outcomes and treatment regimens of the contributing clinical trials. (DOCX 82 kb)

TPS591 Background: No specific targeted therapies are available for Triple Negative Breast Cancers (TNBC), an aggressive and diverse subgroup. The basal TNBC sub-group show some phenotypic and molecular similarities with germline BRCA (gBRCA). In gBRCA patients, and potentially other homologous recombination deficiencies, these already compromised pathways may allow drugs called PARP inhibitors (olaparib) to work more effectively. Aims: To establish if the addition of olaparib to neoadjuvant platinum based chemotherapy for basal TNBC and/or gBRCA breast cancer is safe and improves efficacy (pathological complete response (pCR)). Trial design: 3-stage open label randomised phase II/III trial of neoadjuvant paclitaxel and carboplatin +/- olaparib, followed by clinicians' choice of anthracycline regimen. Stage 1 and 2: Patients are randomised (1:1:1) to either control (3 weekly carboplatin AUC5/weekly paclitaxel 80mg/m2 for 4 cycles) or one of two research arms with the same chemotherapy regimen but with two different schedules of olaparib 150mg BD for 12 days. Stage 3: Patients are randomised (1:1) to either control arm or to the research arm selected in stage 2. Methods: Stage 1 - Safety: both research arms combined. Stage 2 - Schedule selection criteria: pCR rate and completion rate of olaparib protocol treatment. It is a “pick-the-winner” design with 53 patients in each research arm. This allows a 90% power, 5% one-sided significance level to test null hypothesis of pCR ≤35% versus an alternative hypothesis of pCR ≥55% in each of the research arms. Stage 3 - Efficacy: anticipated pCR ~55-60% for all trial patients and ~60-65% for gBRCA patients. The trial is powered to detect an absolute improvement of 15% (all patients) and 20% (gBRCA patients) by adding olaparib to chemotherapy (enriched design). TNBC patient recruitment will be capped, to ensure required gBRCA patients are enrolled. Enrichment design is applied with overall significance level 0.05(α) = 0.025(αall)+ 0.025(αgBRCA) and 80% power. Target accrual: 527 [gBRCA 220] Current accrual: 17 Sites activated: 12 [expected number of sites 30-50].

Background: The combination of PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway inhibitors with endocrine therapy can improve clinical outcomes of hormone receptor positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. Taselisib is a potent and selective PI3K inhibitor, with greater selectivity against mutant (MUT) PI3Kα isoforms than wild-type (WT) via a unique mechanism. Phase Ib data of POSEIDON with Taselisib + tamoxifen (TAM) demonstrated encouraging activity in patients with heavily pre-treated MBC, with an acceptable toxicity profile (Baird et al, ASCO 2016). The recommended phase II dose (RP2D) was Taselisib 4mg plus TAM 20mg, both administered on a daily continuous schedule. ctDNA monitoring may have value in drug development by (1) assessing predictive biomarkers to therapy, (2) providing an early indication of treatment response, and (3) shedding light on potential mechanisms of acquired drug resistance. In some patients included in phase Ib of POSEIDON, tumor response was preceded by a corresponding early change in plasma PIK3CA ctDNA levels. Methods: The phase II portion of the POSEIDON trial is a two-arm, randomized, double blind study of Taselisib plus TAM versus placebo (PLA) plus TAM in pre- and postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2- MBC. In the first part of the Phase II, 180 patients will be randomized (1:1) to receive continuous TAM with either Taselisib at the RP2D or PLA until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient / physician decision. Crossover is allowed upon progressive disease in those patients receiving PLA plus TAM, after collection of tumor and blood samples for exploratory biomarker analysis. Stratification is based on menopausal status, histology [lobular breast cancer (LBC) vs. ductal/others], PIK3CA mutation (WT vs. exon 9 vs. exon 20), prior everolimus, timing of recurrence/progression after prior endocrine therapy, number of prior chemotherapy (CT) lines, and treatment center. After recruiting the initial 180 patients, trial will focus in LBC, until a total number of 110 patients with LBC are enrolled. Other key eligibility criteria include presence of measurable or evaluable disease (RECIST 1.1), prior progression to endocrine treatment, maximum of 5 prior CT lines in the metastatic setting, absence of diabetes under medical treatment, and absence of chronic inflammatory bowel disease. Primary endpoint is investigator-assessed PFS. Key secondary endpoints are PFS in LBC, objective response rate, clinical benefit rate, safety, and exploratory biomarker analysis (including ctDNA). The study has a 90% power at a two-sided log-rank test significance level of 0.2 to detect an HR of 0.64, which corresponds to an increase in median PFS from 4.5 months in the PLA plus TAM arm to 7 months in the Taselisib plus TAM arm. Enrollment to POSEIDON Phase II started in June 2016 (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02285179). Citation Format: Oliveira M, Baird RD, van Rossum AGJ, Beelen K, Garcia-Corbacho J, Mandjes IAM, Vallier AL, van Werkhoven E, Garrigós L, Kumar S, van Tinteren H, Muñoz S, Linossi C, Rosing H, Miquel JM, Schrier M, de Vries Schultink A, Saura C, Gallagher WM, Bernards R, Tabernero J, Cortés J, Caldas C, Linn SC. Phase II of POSEIDON: A phase Ib / randomized phase II trial of tamoxifen plus taselisib or placebo in hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative, metastatic breast cancer patients with prior exposure to endocrine treatment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-01-11.

Purpose: Associations between taxane-related sensory neuropathy (TRSN) and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) have previously been reported, but few have been replicated in large, independent validation studies. This study evaluates the association between previously investigated SNPs and TRSN, using genotype data from a study of chemotherapy-related toxicity in patients with breast cancer. Experimental Design: We investigated 73 SNPs in 50 genes for their contribution to TRSN risk, using genotype data from 1,303 European patients. TRSN was assessed using National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria for adverse events classification. Unconditional logistic regression evaluated the association between each SNP and TRSN risk (primary analysis). Cox regression analysis assessed the association between each SNP and cumulative taxane dose causing the first reported moderate/severe TRSN (secondary analysis). The admixture likelihood (AML) test, which considers all SNPs with a prior probability of association with TRSN together, tested the hypothesis that certain SNPs are truly associated. Results: The AML test provided strong evidence for the association of some SNPs with TRSN (P = 0.023). The two most significantly associated SNPs were rs3213619(ABCB1) [OR = 0.47; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.28–0.79; P = 0.004] and rs9501929(TUBB2A) (OR = 1.80; 95% CI, 1.20–2.72; P = 0.005). A further 9 SNPs were significant at P-value ≤ 0.05. Conclusion: This is currently the largest study investigating SNPs associated with TRSN. We found strong evidence that SNPs within genes in taxane pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic pathways contribute to TRSN risk. However, a large proportion of the inter-individual variability in TRSN remains unexplained. Further validated results from GWAS will help to identify new pathways, genes, and SNPs involved in TRSN susceptibility. Clin Cancer Res; 20(9); 2466–75. ©2014 AACR.

Background: Bevacizumab (bev) has been used with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in breast cancer trials. Geparquinto reported benefit for bev in triple negative (neg) patients (pts) (pathological complete response (pCR) 36.4% vs 27.8% p=0.02), as did CALGB 40603 (pCR 52% vs 44%, p=0.057), although NSABP-B40 showed benefit in ER positive (pos) pts (pCR 23.3% vs 15.2%, p=0.008). Methods: ARTemis is a randomised phase 3 trial adding bev to NACT (docetaxel (D)-FEC). Pts with HER2-neg invasive breast cancer were eligible. Stratification was by age, ER status (neg:weak pos:strong pos), tumour size (T2:T3/4), clinical involvement of axillary nodes and inflammatory/locally advanced disease. Pts were randomised (1:1) to bev+D-FEC or D-FEC. The primary endpoint was pCR, defined as no residual invasive cancer in the breast or axillary lymph nodes after NACT. 800 pts were required to detect 10% differences in pCR rates; 85% power, 5% alpha level. Results: 800 pts were randomised from 66 UK centres (May 2009 to Jan 2013). 68% were D→FECBev+D→FEC % (95%CI)% (95%CI)p *$pCR in all breast tumours AND absence of disease in ax LNs in all breast tumours(n=66/393)(n=87/388) 17% (13-21%)22% (18-27%)0.03 ER neg (Allred 0-2) (n=253)32% (24-41)44% (36-54) ER weak pos (Allred 3-5) (n=67)26% (13-44)52% (34-69) ER strong pos (Allred 6-8) (n=461)7% (4-11)6% (3-10) pCR or MRD in all breast tumours(n=114/394)(n=138/388) 29% (25-34%)36% (31-41%)0.035 ER neg (Allred 0-2) (n=254)45% (36-54)56% (47-65) ER weak pos (Allred 3-5) (n=67)44% (27-62)73% (54-87) ER strong pos (Allred 6-8) (n=461)18% (13-23)19% (14-24) * Adjusted for stratification variables. $ Primary endpoint for the ARTemis trial Conclusions: ARTemis showed a significant improvement in both pCR and MRD rates with the addition of bev to D-FEC. ER-neg and ER-weak pos / HER2-neg breast cancer pts appeared to benefit most from bev, whilst pCR and MRD rates in ER-strong pos pts were lower and did not appear to benefit from bev. Our results are similar to those reported in Geparquinto and CALGB 40603. Citation Format: Helena M Earl, Louise Hiller, Janet A Dunn, Clare Blenkinsop, Louise Grybowicz, Anne-Laure Vallier, Jean Abraham, Jeremy Thomas, Elena Provenzano, Luke Hughes-Davies, Karen McAdam, Stephen Chan, Rizvana Ahmad, Tamas Hickish, Stephen Houston, Daniel Rea, John Bartlett, Carlos Caldas, David Cameron, Larry Hayward. ARTemis: A randomised trial of bevacizumab with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with HER2-negative early breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PD2-3.

2520Background: Endocrine therapy resistance remains a major challenge in the treatment of HR-positive breast cancer. The strategy of combining PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway inhibitors with endocrine therapy can improve clinical outcomes (eg. BOLERO-2, BELLE-2) but at the cost of increased toxicity. Taselisib is a potent, selective, beta-isoform sparing inhibitor of PI3K designed to have a better therapeutic index than first-generation pan-PI3K inhibitors. Methods: Pts with prior exposure to endocrine therapy were enrolled using a 3+3 design, testing taselisib in combination with tamoxifen 20mg qd. A (21 day on / 7 day off) intermittent schedule was also compared with daily continuous dosing (28/28). The primary objective was to determine the recommended phase II dose and schedule. Other objectives included: pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and serial monitoring of plasma ctDNA using digital PCR / tagged amplicon deep-sequencing. Results: 30 pts were enrolled in 3 cohorts: taselisib 2mg (21/7), 4mg (2...

1014Background: ARTemis compared the addition of Bev to neoadjuvant D-FEC in HER2 negative breast cancer. Improved pathological complete response (pCR) with Bev has been reported previously. Method...

Large, simple, pragmatic, low-risk, maintenance treatment\ud trials may seem straightforward to design, run and\ud analyse. However, if trial case record forms (CRFs) are\ud completed infrequently, the reliability of patient recall\ud over these long time-periods is questionable, especially\ud when recording individual incidences and severity of\ud toxicities of specific interest to the trial. It is essential to\ud know these detailed toxicities as it forms an indication\ud of the reduced level of exposure when comparing treatment\ud duration in a non-inferiority trial. Optimal methods\ud of achieving accurate data are required.

Pathological complete response (pCR) is an important predictor of long-term survival in patients with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). At present, the accuracy of traditional radiological assessments during treatment in predicting pCR is poor. Unidimensional and 3D volumetric ultrasound measurements prior to, after 4 cycles (mid-treatment), and at the end of 8 cycles (end-treatment) of chemotherapy were available from a subset of 55 patients enrolled in Neo-tAnGo, a National Cancer Research Network (NCRN) UK neoadjuvant chemotherapy breast cancer trial. Proportional changes in longest diameter (LD) and volume as well as absolute residual size thresholds were examined for their ability to predict pCR or pCR plus minimal residual disease (pCR/MRD). Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) and likelihood ratios (LRs) were calculated. Receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curves and logistic regression models were also constructed. At mid-treatment, neither complete radiological response, nor proportional LD or volume changes were found predictive of final pCR. A small residual tumour volume (≤ 1 cm³ vs. > 1 cm³) at mid-treatment, however, was associated with pCR/MRD (P = 0.014). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, LR+ and LR- values were 61%, 77%, 61%, 77%, 2.62 and 0.51, respectively. The area under the ROC curve was 0.689 (P = 0.03). Volume ≤ 1 cm³ at mid-treatment was found significant in a logistic regression (OR: 0.194, P = 0.011). At end-treatment, no ultrasound measurements were found predictive of pCR or pCR/MRD. In conclusion, proportional tumour size changes (the basis of the RECIST criteria) were not found predictive of good pathological response, although residual volume ≤ 1 cm³ at mid-treatment was found to be predictive of pCR/MRD. However, multiple volume and LD thresholds were examined and uncorrected P values presented, increasing the possibility of type I errors. Replication in an independent dataset is required.

Background Persephone is a phase III randomised controlled trial comparing six months of trastuzumab (9 doses) to the standard 12 month duration (18 doses) in patients with HER2 positive early breast cancer in respect of disease free survival, safety and cost-effectiveness. The trial opened to recruitment in October 2007 but soon showed that meeting recruitment targets was challenging, reaching only 20–30 patients per month. A key issue seemed to be the mandatory requirement to randomise before patients started trastuzumab treatment. Successful accrual of patients in the PHARE trial, a Persephone sister study, run by the National Institute for Cancer, Paris had not incorporated this criteria. Method: In September 2009, following accrual of 316 patients, this potential barrier to recruitment was addressed by a major protocol amendment which relaxed the eligibility criteria to allow randomisation of patients who had received up to 9 doses of trastuzumab. Results: To date, 1334 patients have been randomised into PERSEPHONE. After the amendment, monthly recruitment increased to 40–50 patients and, more recently, to 60–70 patients. Of the 1018 patients recruited since September 2009, 450 (44%) patients had received at least 1 dose of trastuzumab pre-randomisation (see Table). Retrospective collection of pre-randomisation trastuzumab dose and toxicity information has proved successful, allowing analyses of dose intensity, toxicity and compliance to be carried out on all patients. Conclusion: Relaxing the eligibility criteria has considerably improved recruitment into the PERSEPHONE trial without compromising the important endpoints the trial sets out to assess. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-02-08.

1014 Background: Bevacizumab (bev) has been used with NACT in breast cancer trials. Geparquinto reported benefit for bev in triple negative (neg) patients (pts) (pCR 36.4% v 27.8% p=0.02), as did C...

552 Background: PERSEPHONE is a randomised trial comparing 6month (6m) to 12month (12m) of trastuzumab in patients (pts) with HER2-positive early breast cancer. The trial has recruited 3,166 of 4,0...

Background: Persephone is a phase III randomised controlled trial comparing six months of trastuzumab to the standard 12 month duration in patients with HER2 positive early breast cancer in respect of disease free survival, safety and cost-effectiveness. A Persephone sister study, the PHARE trial run by the National Institute for Cancer, successfully closed to recruitment in 2010. A prospective meta-analysis is planned once each trial has reported individually. Methods: A total of 4000 patients will be randomised into each of the two treatment groups. Eligible participants must be Her2 positive with a histological diagnosis of invasive breast cancer and no evidence of metastatic disease. Patients will receive neo-adjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy and have no previous diagnosis of malignancy unless managed by surgical treatment only and disease-free for 10 years. Patients can be randomised at any time prior to receiving their 10th cycle of trastuzumab. The power calculations assume that the disease-free survival (DFS) of the standard treatment of 12 months trastuzumab will be 80% at 4 years. On this basis, with 5% 1-sided significance and 85% power, a trial randomising 2000 in each arm will have the ability to prove non-inferiority of the experimental arm defining non-inferiority as ‘no worse than 3%’ below the control arm 4 year DFS. Primary outcome is disease-free survival non-inferiority (equivalence) of 6 months trastuzumab compared with 12 months in women with early breast cancer. Secondary outcomes are overall survival non-inferiority (equivalence); expected incremental cost effectiveness; cardiology function and analysis of predictive factors for development of cardiac damage. Two mandatory sub-studies are: Tumour block collection to discover molecular predictors of survival with respect to duration of trastuzumab treatment and blood sample collection, used to discover single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) as genetic/pharmaco-genetic determinants of prognosis, toxicity and treatment outcome. A third optional sub-study is the quality of life questionnaires. Results: Persephone opened to recruitment in October 2007. To date, 2152 patients (54%) of its total have been randomised from 147 UK sites. Recruitment is due to complete by December 2013 and the first planned interim analysis of the primary outcome will be mid-2016. Conclusion: The IDSMC last reviewed the trial in December 2011 and congratulated the Trial Management Group on the conduct of the trial and the quality of the data. No safety concerns were identified, and the IDSMC proposed that the trial continue to planned recruitment. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-1-03.