Search

Background: Oral morphine has been widely used to manage children’s pain during burn wound dressing. Rectal ketamine may also be safely administered to children. Objective: To evaluate and compare the efficacy of oral morphine vs. rectal racemic ketamine in management of pain during burn wound dressing in a pediatric population in a rural study population. Methods: This was a randomized open-label clinical trial done in a rural hospital in Uganda. Study participants were randomly assigned to one of the treatment groups, either oral morphine or rectal ketamine, with a ratio of 1:1. Overall, we enrolled 44 participants, with 22 in each treatment arm. Assessment of baseline vital signs, including pulse rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, temperature, oxygen saturation (SPO2), pain assessment (using Face Legs Activity Cry Consolability [FLACC]), and sedation scores (using Richmond’s agitation and sedation scale [RASS]) among others was done. Study participants were followed up hourly for 8 hours for outcomes of interest: adequate pain management/adverse events. Results: The mean age of the study participants was 2.56 (±1.59) years. The overall mean intra-procedural pain difference score for children who received oral morphine was 2.7 (SD±2.2) compared to 0 (SD±0) among those who received rectal ketamine, and the mean difference of 2.7 was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Sialorrhea (hyper-salivation) was the only significant adverse event, with more occurrence in the rectal Ketamine treatment arm (n= 8, 36.3%) compared to 1 (5%) in the oral Morphine treatment arm, p = 0.009. There were no significant adverse effects noted in either treatment arm. Conclusion: The study showed the non-inferiority of rectal ketamine over oral morphine and concluded that administration of rectal ketamine was better at pain management and safety compared to oral morphine. Rectal ketamine is associated with an increased incidence of sialorrhea compared to oral morphine.

Background and objective The role of the antibiogram in reducing hospital length of stay (LOS), mortality rate, health care costs, and, by extension, patients' social, physical, and emotional wellness has a significant impact on the medical community. Hospitals in large cities serve a dynamic population of diverse ethnic groups. Many scholarly works and publications have shown that the antimicrobial pattern in rural settings has significant variability annually. Over the last two years, the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has brought about many unknowns in the sphere of healthcare. The pattern of pathology accompanying COVID-19 has affected hospital policies and direct patient management, leading to a paradigm shift in approaches, policies, and resource utilization. The years 2019 to 2021 were marked by many admissions due to COVID-19, and the effects of COVID-19 are still being studied. In light of this, this study examined the changes in sensitivity patterns, new trends, and nature of bacteria isolates, antimicrobial rates, and susceptibility based on a rural hospital's annual antibiogram pertaining to its central departments: the intensive care unit (ICU), patient care unit (PCU), the outpatient unit, and emergency department (ED). Methods This five-year retrospective antibiogram review compared antibiogram patterns two years before the first case of COVID-19 was reported in the hospital and those two years after the initial outbreak. Results The organism comparative susceptibility tests for

Lack of insight typically complicates psychiatric presentations, necessitating careful thought and planning to choose the best course of treatment. Exploring methods of medication administration techniques in the context of a lack of insight is crucial to achieving the ultimate goal of overcoming the insight barrier as rapidly as possible, which will result in therapeutic benefit. This study's objective was to systematically review the evidence on medication administration techniques in a backdrop of lack of insight and how that evidence was curated in the scientific literature. This study used the literature search strategy, which entails retrieving and analyzing the existing scientific literature pertinent to medication administration techniques for individuals with no insight between 2010 and 2022. Accessing online databases, such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and Medline was utilized in this study's literature search strategy. In our findings, in the primary evidence search, no randomized control trial (RCT) comparing the various models of medication administration with a lack of insight was found. No study provided data on the superiority of utility, quality of life, or efficacy outcome. Some 17 scientific papers were identified that cited various trials about lack of insight and medication use and met the inclusion criteria. We concluded that it could be challenging to administer medication to patients who lack insight. Nonetheless, progress has been made to mitigate this obstacle. Common moral values, common sense, medicolegal support, person-centered integrated care, and cutting-edge medication techniques may play a role. However, these models of medication administration are still evolving, along with the ethical concerns accompanying them. Hopefully, the available models discussed in this analysis will serve as a foundation for future developments. Nonetheless, much remains to be done. We encourage contemporary research to investigate safer and more dynamic methods that can alleviate this condition.