Search

Introduction: Biomarkers that could reliably anticipate the effectiveness of antihistamines and omalizumab in treating chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) have not been conclusively identified. Our objective was to examine how eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP), tryptase, D-dimer, and total Immunoglobulin E (IgE) impact the response to antihistamine and omalizumab treatments in individuals with CSU., Methods: In this cross-sectional retrospective study, CSU patients that had undergone treatment with either antihistamines or omalizumab for a minimum of 12 weeks between 2015 and 2021 at an Allergy and Immunology Department were analyzed. Several demographic and laboratory parameters including eosinophil counts, mean platelet volüme (MPV), sedimentation, C-reactive protein (CRP), antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and Anti-thyroperoxidase (Anti-TPO) and total IgE, tryptase, ECP and D-dimer were retrived from patient files. The association of these biomarkers with Urticaria Control Test (UCT) and the effect of these biomarkers on treatment response were evaluated. Treatment response was assessed using the UCT, with a score of UCT ≥ 12 indicating a responder and UCT < 12 indicating a non responder., Results: The patients in the omalizumab group were older, had a longer disease duration and had worse urticaria control (lower baseline UCT scores). 421 patients were treated with antihistamines and 88 patients were treated with omalizumab. ECP was found to be inversely correlated with baseline UCT ( p  < 0.001 r=-0.268). ECP and D-dimer levels of non-responder patients in the antihistamine group were significantly higher than in responder patients (ECP: 49 ng/mL vs 28.1 ng/mL, p  < 0.001) (D-dimer: 0.60 mg/L vs 0.30 mg/L, p  < 0.001), while there were no significant difference in terms of tryptase and total IgE. These four biomarkers were similar, in omalizumab responders and non responders., Conclusion: In this study with CSU, we looked at predictors of responses to treatments. ECP can serve as a marker of poor urticaria control and may predict antihistamine refractoriness along with D-dimer.

Introduction: There is a significant prevalence of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) in children across the globe. Some children with CSU do not achieve disease control with first-line antihistamine treatment and may need anti-IgE therapy with omalizumab. Recently, several novel treatment options, including dupilumab and BTK inhibitors, showed promising results in the treatment of antihistamine-refractory CSU in adults. However, information regarding their use in pediatric CSU is scarce, and most data is extrapolated from adult studies., Areas Covered: The review highlights the evidence on the use of mAbs and small-molecule inhibitors in pediatric CSU and aims to bridge the knowledge gaps and highlight unmet needs., Expert Opinion: Omalizumab is approved for allergic asthma patients aged ≥6 years, and some experience with omalizumab in children with CSU at this age has been published. However, approximately 5-10% of pediatric CSU patients may show insufficient response to omalizumab, necessitating other therapies. The available information on the off-label use of biologics other than omalizumab in children is limited to case reports. No data is available for other new therapies.

Background: Treatments for allergic rhinitis include intranasal or oral medications., Objective: To perform a systematic review with meta-analysis comparing the effectiveness of intranasal corticosteroids or antihistamines versus oral antihistamines or leukotriene receptor antagonists in improving allergic rhinitis symptoms and quality of life., Methods: We searched four bibliographic databases and three clinical trial datasets for randomized controlled trials (1) assessing patients aged 12 years and older with seasonal or perennial allergic rhinitis, and (2) comparing intranasal corticosteroids or antihistamines versus oral antihistamines or leukotriene receptor antagonists. We performed a meta-analysis of the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS), Total Ocular Symptom Score, Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ), development of adverse events, and withdrawals owing to adverse events. Certainty of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation., Results: We included 35 studies, most of which assessed patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and displayed an unclear risk of bias. Superiority of intranasal treatments was found for all assessed outcomes. Intranasal corticosteroids were more effective than oral antihistamines at improving the TNSS (mean difference [MD], -0.86; 95% CI, -1.21 to -0.51; I 2  = 70%), Total Ocular Symptom Score (MD, -0.36; 95% CI, -0.56 to -0.17; I 2  = 0%), and RQLQ (MD, -0.88; 95% CI, -1.15 to -0.61; I 2  = 0%), which were mostly associated with clinically meaningful improvements. Superiority of intranasal corticosteroids at improving the TNSS was also found against oral leukotriene receptor antagonists (MD, -1.05; 95% CI, -1.33 to -0.77). Intranasal antihistamines were more effective than oral antihistamines at improving the TNSS (MD, -0.47; 95% CI, -0.81 to -0.14; I 2  = 0%) and RQLQ (MD, -0.31; 95% CI, -0.56 to -0.06; I 2  = 0%)., Conclusions: Randomized controlled trials suggest that intranasal treatments are more effective than oral treatments at improving symptoms and quality of life in seasonal allergic rhinitis., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Azelastine nasal spray is effective in relieving symptoms of seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis., Objective: To evaluate the time to onset of efficacy of azelastine hydrochloride (HCl) 0.15% vs placebo in participants with seasonal allergic rhinitis., Methods: A total of 110 participants aged 18 to 65 years were randomized to receive azelastine HCl 0.15% 2 sprays per nostril vs placebo nasal spray after being continuously exposed to ragweed pollen in an environmental exposure chamber. Symptoms were evaluated subjectively by the total nasal symptom score (TNSS) scale. The primary efficacy parameter was the time to onset of efficacy of azelastine as measured by the change from baseline in TNSS 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180, and 240 minutes post-dose., Results: The azelastine nasal spray group had statistically significant improvement in TNSS compared with placebo 30 minutes post-dose (P = .0002), and the effect was sustainable throughout the environmental exposure chamber session for all subsequent time points (P < .0001). Adverse events were mild, including bitter taste, nasal discomfort, epistaxis, sinusitis, and nausea. No major adverse events were reported during the study., Conclusion: Azelastine HCl 0.15% nasal spray relieves nasal symptoms associated with allergic rhinitis and has a fast onset of action within 30 minutes. The overall safety profile of azelastine has also been proven to be safe. These results, along with previous findings on efficacy and improved quality of life for people with allergic rhinitis, establish the important clinical role of azelastine HCl 0.15%., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04264637., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Hsu, Dr Sajjad, Ms Brigham, Mr Centofanti, Dr An, and Dr Ng are employees or contractors of Bayer Consumer Health. Dr Couroux is an employee of Cliantha and the principal investigator of this work. Cliantha received research funding from Bayer Consumer Health to conduct this research., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: There is a lack of real-life safety data on treatment options for chronic urticaria in the presence of comedication and comorbidities., Methods: We present a single-center UCARE pilot study of 212 outpatients with chronic urticaria. Patients were divided into three groups according to different CU therapies according to international guidelines., Results: Of 212 patients, 108 (mean age 48.9 years, 71.3% female) had 59 comorbidities, including cardiovascular, autoimmune and malignant diseases. Patients were followed for a mean of 24.6 months (SD ± 21.3). Urticaria therapies were divided into three groups: A: 105 (97.2%) with omalizumab and 2nd generation antihistamines), B: 16 patients (14.8%): dual therapy with antihistamines and cyclosporine in 10 (9.3%), montelukast in five (4. 6%), dapsone in four (3.7%), hydroxychloroquine in one patient (0.9%), C: 12 (11.1%) patients received a third drug for 4.9 months (SD ± 3.2) and one quadruple therapy (2.1 months). 10 out of 12 (83.3%) patients received montelukast, two (16.7%) cyclosporine, two (16.7%) dapsone and one (8.3%) hydroxychloroquine as a third drug for chronic urticaria., Conclusions: Combining treatment modalities for chronic urticaria and comorbidities are available and feasible with a good safety profile.

Purpose: The presence of wheals or hives has been viewed as a hallmark symptom of urticaria, a highly debilitating disease. This study explores our experience with omalizumab in patients with apparent mast-cell mediated pruritus in the absence of hives., Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective case series examining all patients with mast cell-mediated pruritus in the absence of hives from April 2022 to May 2024 at a tertiary referral clinic at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York. Peak pruritus-numerical rating scale (PP-NRS) itch score changes over time were recorded and analyzed., Results: Six patients (67% women; mean [SD] age, 47.67 [13.52] years) were included in the analysis. The median [IQR] pruritus PP-NRS itch score before omalizumab injection was 9 [6 - 10] and the final median [IQR] PP-NRS itch score was 2.5 [0 - 5]. The mean [SD] reduction in the PP-NRS itch score was 6 [3.16]., Conclusions: This study suggests that patients with evidence of mast cell-mediated pruritus can be identified based on clinical features and may benefit from omalizumab therapy.

Aquagenic urticaria, a rare dermatological condition characterised by urticarial eruptions following water contact, poses significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. This condition, although uncommon, necessitates heightened clinical awareness due to its substantial impact on the patient's quality of life. We present a comprehensive account of a paediatric case involving a girl in her mid-teens, who developed recurrent wheals post-exposure to water, independent of its temperature or source. Diagnosis hinged on a detailed clinical history and a definitive water provocation test, with routine laboratory assessments yielding no contributory findings. The therapeutic regimen featuring cetirizine yielded significant symptomatic relief. Although antihistamines are the cornerstone of treatment, the differential response among individuals necessitates an individualised approach, considering adjunctive treatments such as omalizumab and ultraviolet therapy. This case reinforces the critical role of clinical acumen in the recognition and diagnosis of aquagenic urticaria and calls for further research into its pathophysiology to refine treatment strategies., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Oral immunotherapy is proposed as the only active intervention to modify allergies and decrease the risk of severe reactions. However, it is crucial to note that oral immunotherapy still presents a notable failure rate and potential for severe, life-threatening outcomes. Notably, patients who discontinue oral immunotherapy may face an increased risk of fatal reactions. Omalizumab could be a viable option for patients with failed oral immunotherapy., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Importance: Chronic spontaneous urticaria affects approximately 1% of the general population worldwide, including approximately 3 million people in the US, impairs patients' quality of life, and is associated with multiple comorbidities., Observations: Chronic spontaneous urticaria affects patients of any age but is most common in females aged 30 to 50 years. Diagnosis is based on clinical presentation, ie, spontaneously recurring wheals, angioedema, or both. Chronic spontaneous urticaria persists for more than 1 year in most patients (1 or repeated episodes) and may present with comorbidities including chronic inducible urticaria (>10%), autoimmune thyroiditis (approximately 20%), metabolic syndrome (6%-20%), and anxiety (10%-31%) and depression (7%-29%). Known autoimmune endotypes (subtypes of urticaria defined by distinct pathogenesis) of chronic spontaneous urticaria are mediated by mast cell-activating IgE and/or IgG autoantibodies (>50%). Approximately 40% of patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria have a Dermatology Life Quality Index of more than 10, corresponding to a very large or extremely large negative effect on quality of life. Second-generation H1 antihistamines are first-line treatment; partial or complete response, defined as a reduction in urticaria symptoms of greater than 50%, is observed in approximately 40% of patients. The 2022 international urticaria guideline recommends the monoclonal anti-IgE antibody omalizumab as second-line treatment for antihistamine-refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria. However, at least 30% of patients have an insufficient response to omalizumab, especially those with IgG-mediated autoimmune urticaria. Cyclosporine, used off-label, can improve symptoms in approximately 54% to 73% of patients, especially those with autoimmune chronic spontaneous urticaria and nonresponse to omalizumab, but has adverse effects such as kidney dysfunction and hypertension., Conclusions and Relevance: Chronic spontaneous urticaria is an inflammatory skin disease associated with medical and psychiatric comorbidities and impaired quality of life. Second-generation H1 antihistamines are first-line treatment, omalizumab is second-line treatment, and cyclosporine is third-line treatment for chronic spontaneous urticaria.

Delayed pressure urticaria (DPU) is a subset of chronic inducible urticaria. It is characterized by the formation of wheals anytime between 30 minutes and 24 hours after stimulus exposure of localized pressure application. In this case report, we discuss a military flight crew member with no significant past medical history who developed DPU following rapid decompression in an altitude chamber. The chamber training included an uneventful ascent to 45,000 feet, higher than he had been previously, and a rapid decompression. About 16 hours later, he developed pruritic swelling of his hands and feet, along with diffuse deep nodular swelling, erythematous plaques, and erythematous nodules. His DPU was refractory to monotherapy treatment with antihistamines, and he continued to develop lesions in weight-bearing areas. Control of symptoms was achieved through combination treatment of a second-generation antihistamine, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, and an immunosuppressant (cyclosporine). His waiver to return to flight status was denied while on cyclosporine. He was transitioned to a monoclonal antibody that binds free immunoglobin E (omalizumab) with resolution of symptoms and was cleared to return to active duty., (© The Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2024. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site–for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction: A patient was presented with a history of idiopathic recurrent anaphylaxis after administration of Pfizer BioNTech mRNA vaccine, and the attacks were controlled with omalizumab. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of recurrent idiopathic anaphylaxis (IA) after administration of Pfizer BioNTech mRNA vaccine., Case Presentation: A 52-year-old man with recurrent episodes of IA after COVID-19 vaccination presented to our adult Allergy and Immunology Clinic. In the patient, urticaria and anaphylaxis episodes could not be controlled with high-dose antihistamine and systemic steroid treatment, and complete control was achieved with omalizumab treatment and anaphylaxis attacks completely regressed., Conclusion: In cases of unexplained or recurrent anaphylaxis in adult patients, COVID-19 vaccination and timing should be questioned, and its association with anaphylaxis might be considered., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Patients and families living with food allergy may experience significant burdens, including social isolation, impaired quality of life, and anxiety. Allergists/immunologists play a critical role in educating families living with food allergies about risk, particularly with regard to the rarity of fatal food allergy. Appropriate risk framing can greatly decrease the fear-based burden of disease. In 2024, an increasing complex fabric of food allergy treatments has emerged that includes oral immunotherapy (OIT), sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT), and omalizumab, with the promise of additional treatments, including epicutaneous immunotherapy and oral mucosal immunotherapy in the near future. Younger children may be most likely to benefit from OIT and SLIT, with some evidence that suggests the possibility of an immunomodulatory effect. Omalizumab, approved in 2024 for use in conjunction with strict avoidance, increases the threshold of reactivity before a moderate-to-severe reaction for many, but not all, patients. There is no evidence to date that omalizumab has an immunomodulatory effect, and young children treated with omalizumab monotherapy may bear a lost opportunity cost from possible immunomodulation would they have been treated with OIT or SLIT instead; however, within a shared decision-making paradigm, beyond label use of omalizumab may include treatment with OIT or SLIT. Fortunately, the co-evolution of shared decision-making with modern food allergy treatments will facilitate the critical preference-sensitive care that must be characteristic of all decisions surrounding active food allergy management.

Immunoglobuin E (IgE)-mediated food allergies greatly impact patients and their families, causing financial and emotional stress, and placing them at risk for lifethreatening reactions. Until recently, food allergies have been treated with allergen avoidance and emergency treatment of allergic reactions. Omalizumab was recently approved in adults and children greater than one year who are allergic to one or more foods for the prevention of serious allergic reactions in the setting of accidental exposure. Omalizumab also shows promise when combined with oral immunotherapy for possible allergen ingestion. Other classes of biologics and small molecule inhibitors have also demonstrated potential for use in preventing and treating food allergy., Competing Interests: Disclosure K.K. Brar has served as an advisor and received research support from Incyte Pharmaceuticals. She is an investigator for Sanofi, and Siolta Therapeutics., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In February 2024, omalizumab was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of food allergy, based on data from the landmark phase 3 clinical trial, Omalizumab as Monotherapy and as Adjunct Therapy in Children and Adults (OUtMATCH). In this Rostrum, OUtMATCH investigators share their perspectives on the trial results, the implications for translation into daily practice, and on remaining gaps in the field. The study met its primary and key secondary end points, demonstrating a large effect size in multiallergen desensitization compared with placebo; yet there were some participants who did not respond, and the percentage of responders tolerating all 3 food allergens was lower than that for single foods. Clinicians are likely to have many questions about appropriate patient selection, monitoring for treatment responsiveness, and how to manage off-label considerations such as dietary incorporation or cotreatment with oral immunotherapy. Additional research is needed to answer these remaining questions and ensure that the translation of omalizumab in real-world practice leads to high-quality outcomes., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Anaphylaxis is a globally increasing allergic reaction that is often fatal. Recently, our previous study reported the possibility of using the modified natural products "sodium R-lipoate (NaRLA) and enzymatically modified isoquercitrin (EMIQ)" as potential novel safe agents against the non-immunological-degranulation of mast cells., Methods: Here, we extended our previous findings by determining the antianaphylactic activity of 50 and 100 mg/kg body weight of NaRLA and EMIQ (given orally and prior to local or systemic challenge) in mice models of ovalbumin (OVA)-induced IgE-dependent active cutaneous anaphylaxis (ACA) and active systemic anaphylaxis (ASA) in comparison with sulfasalazine (SSZ, amast cell stabilizer)., Results: The pre-treatment of mice with NaRLA or EMIQ completely succeeded, as SSZ, in suppression of the increased vascular permeability associated with IgE-dependent ACA and protected the OVA-sensitized mice from fatal ASA by reducing ( p < .001) the skin mast cell degranulation, the elevated peritoneal histamine and interleukin-4 levels, along with decreasing the associated sever gastrointestinal and lung histopathological alterations and inflammation. The high dose of EMIQ prevented death in 70% of mice with anaphylactic shock, better than SSZ., Discussion: Our data indicated that NaRLA and EMIQ may be potential prophylactic and therapeutic candidates for the alleviation of atopic and systemic anaphylaxis.

We present the case of a patient with failed desensitisation to paclitaxel that was ultimately successful with omalizumab treatment. Our patient, a female aged between 20-25 and diagnosed with a triple negative breast cancer, received first-line treatment with carboplatin and paclitaxel. During the second cycle of paclitaxel, she experienced heat, dyspnoea, facial angioedema and vomiting. Skin tests for allergic reactions returned negative results, and drug provocation tests showed a positive result (anaphylaxis). Rapid drug desensitisation (RDD) was carried out with two bags of dilutions but at the beginning of the infusion, the patient experienced symptoms again, so the infusion was stopped. Therefore, the use of omalizumab, already reported as a successful adjuvant in desensitisation to other drugs, was considered. The anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) monoclonal antibody was administered off-label before the first programmed desensitisation with success: total dose of paclitaxel was infused without any reaction. The patient was able to receive the complete chemotherapy treatment., Competing Interests: Competing interests: JLA acknowledges payments from Lilly, Roche, Novartis and that he is a member of the Safety Monitoring Board of his institution., (© European Association of Hospital Pharmacists 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Hypersensitivity to exogenous or endogenous progesterone presents with a variety of clinical, usually cutaneous, manifestations. The condition can occur at any age during the reproductive years, causes debilitating symptoms and can impact the use of exogenous hormones. Management strategies include symptom control or hormonal manipulation via desensitisation. Strategic testing confirms the diagnosis, while targeted intervention can significantly and positively impact quality of life and further childbearing., (© 2024 The Author(s). Internal Medicine Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australasian College of Physicians.)

Purpose of Review: Allergic conjunctivitis is characterized by the development of pathophysiological changes to the ocular surface, which occurs when pro-allergic and pro-inflammatory mediators interact with their cognate receptors expressed on immune and nonimmune cells. Traditional treatments with antihistamines and corticosteroids provide relief, but there is a need for more efficacious and tolerable long-term therapy with a better safety profile. This article aims to provide an overview of the mode of action and clinical application of agonist therapies targeting glucocorticoid, melanocortin, and toll-like receptors, as well as antagonist therapies targeting cytokine, chemokine, integrin, and histamine receptors., Recent Findings: There has been considerable advancement in immunology and pharmacology, as well as a greater understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms of allergic conjunctivitis. Recent research advancing therapy for allergic conjunctivitis has focused on developing synthetic molecules and biologics that can interfere with the process of the allergic immune reaction., Summary: This review discusses novel therapeutic receptors being explored agonistically or antagonistically to develop alternative treatment options for allergic conjunctivitis. These novel approaches hold promise for improving the management of allergic eye diseases, offering patients hope for more effective and safer treatment options in the future., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Outcomes for high-risk neuroblastoma have improved with the addition of antidisialoganglioside (GD2) antibody-mediated immunotherapy to multimodality therapy. Urticaria is an expected side effect of anti-GD2 immunotherapy. Rarely, despite maximal use of antihistamines and H2 receptor antagonists, refractory urticaria can result in impaired quality of life, and delays or discontinuation of immunotherapy. The anti-IgE monoclonal antibody, omalizumab, is approved for the treatment of asthma and chronic spontaneous urticaria. We successfully managed grade 3, naxitamab-related urticaria refractory to standard management in 2 patients using omalizumab, allowing for continued anti-GD2 immunotherapy. Omalizumab did not impact antitumor activity or immunogenicity of naxitamab., Competing Interests: M.L. declares consulting roles with Novartis. S.M. declares consulting roles with Ymabs Therapeutics, US WorldMeds, EUSA Pharma, and Innervate RP Inc. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Chronic urticaria can be divided into 2 subsets: chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) with skin lesions occurring without a specific trigger and chronic inducible urticaria, which has an identified specific stimulus. The annual prevalence of chronic urticaria is 0.5% to 2.3% globally. The CSU is a self-limited disorder in most cases, with an average duration of 2 to 5 years, but symptoms persist beyond 5 years in up to 30% of patients. The first line of treatment is a daily nonsedating, second-generation H1-antihistamine. The CSU guidelines recommend using oral nonsedating antihistamines up to 4 fold in patients with CSU unresponsive to standard doses as the next step in treatment. A meta-analysis found that the rate of response in patients with CSU who responded to updosing was 63.2%. Therefore, approximately 40% of patients continue to have persistent hives and itching requiring treatment with the biologic omalizumab, based on evidence from randomized controlled trials. Although omalizumab has been shown to markedly relieve symptoms of CSU, omalizumab is not effective in all patients and has not been shown to induce long-term disease remission. Thus, there is an unmet need for more effective treatments that can lead to cure or long-term remission. In this review, we will provide an overview of new treatment targets and biologics that are under investigation for the treatment of CSU., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Saini reports receiving grant, research, and/or clinical trial support from the National Institutes of Health, Novartis, Sanofi, Regeneron, Amgen, Allakos, and Escient and served as a consultant or advisory boards to Allakos, Granular Therapeutics, Novartis, Aquestive, Regeneron, Escient, Innate, Celltrion, and Sanofi. Dr Min has no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Purpose of Review: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) patients sometimes do not respond to second-generation antihistamine, and 10-50% patients do not even respond to four-fold the usual dose of nonsedating H1 antihistamine, which further leads to repeated courses of oral corticosteroids to abate the symptoms. There are third-line agents approved by EAACI guidelines, which include omalizumab and cyclosporine. Certain patients are even resistant to the third-line agents. In this review, various other treatment options will be discussed in patients of refractory CSU., Recent Findings: Recently, we demonstrated azathioprine as a possible third-line option, which was found noninferior to cyclosporine in antihistamine refractory CSU. There have been trials, studies, case series and reports, which suggest other putative options for refractory CSU management., Summary: Studies on the management of refractory CSU are accumulating thereby expanding the armamentarium of dermatologists and allergologist against difficult-to-treat urticaria patients., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Chronic urticaria (CU) is characterized by weals (hives) angio-oedema (or both) that last for ≥ 6 weeks, with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) being the most common subtype. Patients with omalizumab-refractory CSU represent an unmet clinical need. In this study, we aimed to assess the prevalence and predictors of omalizumab failure in a large cohort of patients with CU and assess the effectiveness of dupilumab for omalizumab-refractory CU. Of 338 patients with CU, 33 received omalizumab; 69.7% (n = 23) were responders and 30.3% (n = 10) were nonresponders. Bivariate regression demonstrated that female sex [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14-2.06], higher baseline weekly urticaria activity score (aOR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.09) and older age (controlling for sex) (aOR 1.00, 95% CI 1.00-1.01) were associated with omalizumab failure. Of 10 patients with omalizumab-refractory CU, 3 were well controlled with ciclosporin (all children), whereas the 7 adults failed a mean [standard deviation (SD)] of 5.6 (2.6) treatments, including ciclosporin. All seven achieved a complete response with dupilumab, with time to response varying between 1 and 6 months. While our results suggest a favourable efficacy of dupilumab in patients with omalizumab-refractory CU, future confirmatory studies are required., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest EN has been a speaker or consultant, or has received investigator-initiated research funding from AbbVie, Arcutis, Bausch Health, Boehringer Ingelheim International, Bristol Myers Squibb, Galderma, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Medexus, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Sanofi Genzyme, Sun Pharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly and UCB. EN is the founder of Montreal Derm FilEZ website, which is a non-profit educational resource. M.B.-S. is a consultant for Novartis and Sanofi. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists.)

Background: Galectin-9 (Gal-9) has been implicated in allergic and autoimmune diseases, but its role and relevance in chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) are unclear., Objectives: To characterize the role and relevance of Gal-9 in the pathogenesis of CSU., Methods: We assessed 60 CSU patients for their expression of Gal-9 on circulating eosinophils and basophils as well as T cell expression of the Gal-9 receptor TIM-3, compared them with 26 healthy controls (HCs), and explored possible links with disease features including disease activity (urticaria activity score, UAS), total IgE, basophil activation test (BAT), and response to omalizumab treatment. We also investigated potential drivers of Gal-9 expression by eosinophils and basophils., Results: Our CSU patients had markedly increased rates of circulating Gal-9 + eosinophils and basophils and high numbers of lesional Gal-9 + cells. High rates of blood Gal-9 + eosinophils/basophils were linked to high disease activity, IgE levels, and BAT negativity. Serum levels of TNF-α were positively correlated with circulating Gal-9 + eosinophils/basophils, and TNF-α markedly upregulated Gal-9 on eosinophils. CSU patients who responded to omalizumab treatment had more Gal-9 + eosinophils/basophils than non-responders, and omalizumab reduced blood levels of Gal-9 + eosinophils/basophils in responders. Gal-9 + eosinophils/basophils were negatively correlated with TIM-3 + T H 17 cells., Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate a previously unrecognized involvement of the Gal-9/TIM-3 pathway in the pathogenesis CSU and call for studies that explore its relevance., (© 2024 The Author(s). Allergy published by European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Limited information is available on the use of omalizumab (OMA) updosing since its introduction as a second-line therapy in chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) in 2014. Practical guidelines from health authorities are lacking, and the specific characteristics of patients requiring higher doses remain unknown. Our objectives were to characterize the patterns of OMA updosing (defined as changes in dose and/or injection intervals), to identify the predictive factors associated with updosing, and to improve CSU management., Methods: We conducted a prospective, multicentric, real-life observational study, including patients diagnosed with CSU and starting OMA. The data were collected at 0, 3, 6, and 9 months. The primary endpoint was the frequency of OMA updosing at 3 months. The secondary endpoints included an analysis of updosed patients' profile, and an assessment of OMA efficacy and safety., Results: We included 153 patients. Twenty percent of patients were updosed at 3 months, and 27% in total during the 9-month follow-up. Practitioners mainly chose to increase the frequency of injections (66%). At baseline, the updosed patients were more likely to have more severe CSU (UCT < 4, p < 0.030), a lower lymphocyte count (<2000/mm 3 , p = 0.037), and low IgE levels (<70 UI/mL, p = 0.024). The side effects of OMA were not more frequent after updosing., Conclusion: One in five patient underwent updosing within just 3 months. OMA updosing is frequent in particular in cases of severe disease and low IgE blood levels., (© 2024 The Author(s). Allergy published by European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a common, debilitating skin disorder characterized by recurring episodes of raised, itchy and sometimes painful wheals lasting longer than 6 weeks. CSU is mediated by mast cells which are absent from peripheral blood. However, lineage - CD34 hi CD117 int/hi FcεRI + cells in blood have previously been shown to represent a mast cell precursor., Methods: We enumerated FcεRI - , FcεRI + and FcεRI hi lineage - CD34 + CD117 + cells using flow cytometry in blood of patients with CSU (n = 55), including 12 patients receiving omalizumab and 43 not receiving omalizumab (n = 43). Twenty-two control samples were studied. Disease control and patient response to omalizumab was evaluated using the urticaria control test. We performed single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-Seq) on lineage - CD34 hi CD117 hi blood cells from a subset of patients with CSU (n = 8) and healthy controls (n = 4)., Results: CSU patients had more lineage - CD34 + CD117 + FcεRI + blood cells than controls. Lineage - CD34 + CD117 + FcεRI + cells were significantly higher in patients with CSU who had an objective clinical response to omalizumab when compared to patients who had poor disease control 90 days after initiation of omalizumab. scRNA-Seq revealed that lineage - CD34 + CD117 + FcεRI + cells contained both lymphoid and myeloid progenitor lineages, with omalizumab responsive patients having proportionally more myeloid progenitors. The myeloid progenitor lineage contained small numbers of true mast cell precursors along with more immature FcεRI - and FcεRI + myeloid progenitors., Conclusion: Increased blood CD34 + CD117 + FcεRI + cells may reflect enhanced bone marrow egress in the setting of CSU. High expression of these cells strongly predicts better clinical responses to the anti-IgE therapy, omalizumab., (© 2024 The Authors. Allergy published by European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of a once a day, over the counter antihistamine eye drop, 0.7% olopatadine hydrochloride, in treating or preventing experimentally induced allergic conjunctivitis in dogs., Animals Studied: Twelve systemically healthy pet dogs with no known history of allergies or atopic dermatitis, and in the past 12 months had no known ocular abnormalities., Procedures: Dogs were randomly assigned to two groups: "Treatment" which received topical 0.7% olopatadine hydrochloride and "Control" which received artificial tears. Dogs received the antihistamine eye drops before (Phase 1) or after (Phase 2) receiving a compounded ophthalmic histamine solution to induce clinical signs of allergic conjunctivitis. Conjunctival hyperemia, chemosis, follicles, ocular discharge, and ocular pruritus were graded, and photographs were used to document changes. Schirmer tear test values, fluorescein staining, and intraocular pressures were monitored throughout., Results: In both Phase 1 and Phase 2, conjunctival scores increased 10 min after histamine administration (p < .05). There was no difference between maximum overall conjunctival scores between treatment and control groups in either phase or when comparing treatment groups of Phase 1 to Phase 2 (p > .05). However, treatment groups in Phase 2 did have a higher maximum conjunctival chemosis score and spent more time at their maximum chemosis score when compared to Phase 1 (p < .05)., Conclusion: Olopatadine may be beneficial as prophylaxis to reduce the degree and duration of clinical signs of allergic conjunctivitis., (© 2023 The Authors. Veterinary Ophthalmology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Veterinary Ophthalmologists.)

Purpose: To assess the effect of anti-allergic therapy on sleep quality of children with allergic conjunctivitis (AC) and their parents., Methods: This prospective single-arm intervention study included 54 AC child-parent dyads. Chinese versions of the Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ) and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) were used to assess the sleep quality of children and their parents, respectively., Results: CSHQ and PSQI total scores were significantly decreased after treatment, with fewer children and parents reporting poor sleep quality. Part impaired sleep behaviors of children and parents can recover to the normal levels. Sleep quality improved greater in children with a severe type of AC, those with worse baseline signs, and without other allergic diseases. For both children and parents, greater improvements in sleep quality were associated with longer treatment duration and with worse baseline sleep quality., Conclusion: Successful management of AC improves sleep quality for both children and their parents.

Background: Omalizumab is an anti-IgE therapy newly approved by the Food and Drug Administration for allergen agnostic treatment of single or multiple food allergies in patients aged 1 year or older., Objective: Evaluate the cost-effectiveness of omalizumab as a food allergy treatment., Methods: We evaluated health and economic outcomes in Markov cohorts of simulated food allergic infants randomized to receive omalizumab using a 15-year horizon. Monte Carlo simulation was used (n = 40,000 subjects) to evaluate cost-effectiveness from a societal perspective, incorporating both a family-level and individual-level analysis. We included family-level analysis to incorporate a broad perspective for health utility change, given treatment effects likely benefit all parties at home (eg, caregivers, siblings), not just the patient, representing the sum of changes in all such persons. Supplemental analyses explored lower omalizumab cost and home initiation. We performed deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses., Results: In the family-level cohort analysis, omalizumab exceeded cost-effectiveness thresholds ($185,183/quality-adjusted life-years [QALY]). In a comparison of the omalizumab strategy (OMA) with the non-omalizumab strategy, the cost of OMA exceeded the non-omalizumab strategy ($315,020 vs $136,609) with greater incremental effectiveness (12.668 vs 11.699 QALY). In the individual-level analysis, the cost-effectiveness of OMA was $573,698/QALY. In base-case assessments, OMA was cost-effective (willingness to pay, $100,000/QALY) at a health state utility (HSU) improvement of 0.265. The value-based cost of OMA ranged from $14,166 to $23,791 when it was considered at the individual and family-unit levels. Requiring OMA administration in the clinic was not cost-effective (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, $260,239)., Conclusions: In the base case and at current pricing, omalizumab is not cost-effective, but it could be at a lower retail price or when use creates large health utility shifts in the family and patient., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To highlight common mechanistic targets for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) and IgE-mediated food allergy (IgE-FA) with potential to be effective for both diseases and prevent atopic progression., Data Sources: Data sources were PubMed searches or National Clinical Trials (NCT)-registered clinical trials related to AD, IgE-FA, and other atopic conditions, especially focused on the pediatric population., Study Selections: Human seminal studies and/or articles published in the past decade were emphasized with reference to preclinical models when relevant. NCT-registered clinical trials were filtered by inclusion of pediatric subjects younger than 18 years with special focus on children younger than 12 years as a critical period when AD and IgE-FA diseases may often be concurrent., Results: AD and IgE-FA share several pathophysiologic features, including epithelial barrier dysfunction, innate and adaptive immune abnormalities, and microbial dysbiosis, which may be critical for the clinical progression between these diseases. Revolutionary advances in targeted biologic therapies have shown the benefit of inhibiting type 2 immune responses, using dupilumab (anti-interleukin-4Rα) or omalizumab (anti-IgE), to potentially reduce symptom burden for both diseases in pediatric populations. Although the potential for biologics to promote disease remission (AD) or sustained unresponsiveness (IgE-FA) remains unclear, the refinement of biomarkers to predict infants at risk for atopic disorders provides promise for prevention through timely intervention., Conclusion: AD and IgE-FA exhibit common features that may be leveraged to develop biologic therapeutic strategies to treat both conditions and even prevent atopic progression. Future studies should be designed with consistent age stratification in the pediatric population and standardized regimens of adjuvant oral immunotherapy or dose escalation (IgE-FA) to improve cross-study interpretation., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a highly prevalent and difficult to manage cutaneous disease characterized by the presence of recurrent urticaria, angioedema, or both, for a period of 6 weeks or longer. One of the biological treatments used for patients with CSU with an autoimmune background and bad control of the disease is omalizumab, an anti-IgE monoclonal antibody. The understanding of the mechanism of action of this biological drug in CSU along with the identification of potential biomarkers of clinical response can be helpful in the personalized management of the disease., Objective: The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of omalizumab on peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations in patients with CSU in order to identify potential biomarkers of treatment response., Methods: We analyzed 71 patients with CSU [33 under omalizumab and 38 under non-immunomodulatory drugs (treated with antihistamines; NID)] and 50 healthy controls. An exhaustive immunophenotyping of whole blood T-cell subpopulations, including naïve, central memory, effector memory, effector cells, Th1, Th2, and Th17 was performed by multiparametric flow cytometry. Moreover, in CSU patients, we analyzed markers of inflammation (ESR, DD, CRP), atopy (prick test, IgE quantification), and autoimmunity (anti-thyroid antibodies and indirect basophil activation test).To evaluate the clinical activity, the Urticaria Activity Score 7 (UAS 7) test was used., Results: In patients with CSU under treatment with omalizumab, there was a significant decrease in the percentage of naïve and an increase in the percentage of central memory CD4 T cells as well as a decrease in the percentage of naïve and increase in the percentage of effector CD8 T-cell subsets. Moreover, patients under treatment with omalizumab had higher percentages of Th1 and Th2 cells than patients under treatment with NID., Conclusion: The immune monitoring of T-cell subpopulations in patients with CSU starting omalizumab, may be a useful strategy to analyze treatment response in the clinical practice., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 López, Depreux, Bielsa, Roger, Quirant-Sanchez, Basagaña, Jurgens, Padró, Miquel, Martinez-Caceres and Teniente-Serra.)

Background: Vitamin K3 (VK3), a fat-soluble synthetic analog of the vitamin K family, has coagulant, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, and anticancer properties. Pseudo allergy is a IgE-independent immune response associated with mast cells. This study investigated the role of VK3 in IgE-independent mast cell activation., Methods: Substance P (SP) was used to induce LAD2-cell activation in order to analyze the effects of VK3 in vitro. Cutaneous allergy and systemic allergy mouse models were used to analyze the anti-pseudo-allergic effects of VK3. Proteome microarray assays were used to analyze VK3-binding protein. Biolayer interferometry and immunoprecipitation were used to verify interaction between VK3 and its key targets. RNA interference was used to determine the role of GAB1 in LAD2cell activation., Results: VK3 inhibited SP-induced LAD2-cell activation, and resulted in the release of β-hexosaminidase, histamine and cytokines; VK3 inhibited SP-induced pseudo allergic reactions in mice, and serum histamine and TNF-α levels decreased. Degranulation of skin mast cells was reduced; GAB1 in mast cells was stably bound to VK3. GAB1 participated in SP-induced LAD2-cell activation. GAB1 knockdown in LAD2 cells prevented SP-induced β-hexosaminidase release, calcium mobilization and cell skeletal remodeling. VK3 directly binds to GAB1 and reduces its expression to inhibited SP-induced LAD2 cell activation., Conclusion: The anti-pseudo-allergic activity of VK3 was confirmed in vitro and in vivo. VK3 can inhibit SP-induced mast cell activation by directly targeting GAB1. This study provides new insights on the activity of VK3 and the mechanism of pseudoallergic reaction., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: To acknowledge, the newly available treatments for food allergy described in the latest scientific literature, such as oral immunotherapy (OIT), biologics and the combination of them in managing patients with IgE-mediated food allergies., Recent Findings: Recent studies suggest that OIT and biologics, alone or together, can have a role as disease-modifying treatments for food allergies. The FDA has recently approved omalizumab as a treatment for food allergy. Other biologics are currently under evaluation and further studies are needed to assess the efficacy and safety of these therapies., Summary: The allergology scenario is rapidly evolving, the recent introduction and approval of new therapeutic strategies such as biotechnological drugs and allergen immunotherapy is changing the therapeutic paradigm: we are witnessing a shift from a strategy based on avoiding the trigger and reversing an allergic reaction already in progress, to one that aims to modify the natural history of the disease by acting on the immunological mechanisms that determine it. This approach is consistent with the modern perspective of a personalized patient-tailored medicine. In this opinion review, we will provide a brief analysis of current and future therapeutic options for IgE-mediated food allergy, focusing on OIT, biologics and their combination., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) significantly impacts the quality of life of affected individuals. This study aimed to elucidate the epidemiological and clinical profiles of adult CSU patients in Latvia. Patient interviews and electronic medical records from two study centres in Riga, Latvia, were reviewed. PROMs, including UCT, UAS7, USS, and CU-Q2oL, were used to assess disease control, activity, severity, and quality of life. Statistical analysis was performed using Jamovi v. 2.3.28 and IBM SPSS v. 29.0.0.0. The cohort included 140 CSU patients (76.4% female; mean age 41.3 ± 14.9 years), mostly urban residents (87.1%) and non-smokers (53.6%). Urticaria with angioedema occurred in 52.1% and isolated urticaria in 47.9%, with 40% experiencing CSU for 1-5 years. Accompanying symptoms were reported by 63% and triggers by 72.9%. Allergy history and autoimmune disease diagnosis were noted in 49.3% and 29.3%. Treatment mainly involved second-generation antihistamines (85.7%) and omalizumab (17.9%). Mean scores for USS, UCT, and UAS7 were 28.8 (SD: 17.8), 8.2 (SD: 3.7), and 17.2 (SD: 14.1). UAS7 indicated severe CSU in 28.6%, and UCT suggested poorly controlled disease in 77.9%. CU-Q2oL total scores revealed mental status as the most affected domain (mean score: 51.7, SD: 28.7), with a significant association between accompanying symptoms and questionnaire scores. This study provides insights into the demographic and clinical aspects of CSU patients in Latvia, highlighting areas for potential improvement in patient care and emphasizing the need for further investigation into treatment outcomes and patient quality of life.

Background: There is insufficient systematized evidence on the effectiveness of individual intranasal medications in allergic rhinitis (AR)., Objectives: We sought to perform a systematic review to compare the efficacy of individual intranasal corticosteroids and antihistamines against placebo in improving the nasal and ocular symptoms and the rhinoconjunctivitis-related quality of life of patients with perennial or seasonal AR., Methods: The investigators searched 4 electronic bibliographic databases and 3 clinical trials databases for randomized controlled trials (1) assessing adult patients with seasonal or perennial AR and (2) comparing the use of intranasal corticosteroids or antihistamines versus placebo. Assessed outcomes included the Total Nasal Symptom Score, the Total Ocular Symptom Score, and the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire. The investigators performed random-effects meta-analyses of mean differences for each medication and outcome. The investigators assessed evidence certainty using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach., Results: This review included 151 primary studies, most of which assessed patients with seasonal AR and displayed unclear or high risk of bias. Both in perennial and seasonal AR, most assessed treatments were more effective than placebo. In seasonal AR, azelastine-fluticasone, fluticasone furoate, and fluticasone propionate were the medications with the highest probability of resulting in moderate or large improvements in the Total Nasal Symptom Score and Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire. Azelastine-fluticasone displayed the highest probability of resulting in moderate or large improvements of Total Ocular Symptom Score. Overall, evidence certainty was considered "high" in 6 of 46 analyses, "moderate" in 23 of 46 analyses, and "low"/"very low" in 17 of 46 analyses., Conclusions: Most intranasal medications are effective in improving rhinitis symptoms and quality of life. However, there are relevant differences in the associated evidence certainty., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU) management often follows chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) guidelines, but a step-by-step evaluation of their effectiveness in CIndU is lacking., Objective: To assess the clinical impact of adapting CSU international guidelines for CIndU management., Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study involving patients diagnosed with CIndU based on challenge tests and a Urticaria Control Test (UCT) score of ≤11 points. Following the guidelines, a stepwise approach was used: avoidance measures, antihistamines, omalizumab, and cyclosporine. Treatment steps were added based on individual response, with control defined as UCT ≥12 points. Pharmacological steps were evaluated for at least 1 month, with the next step initiated in case of a UCT score ≤11 points., Results: We enrolled 194 patients with CIndU. Of them, 134 patients had CIndU with concomitant CSU and 60 had CIndU only. Following the step-by-step approach outlined in the guidelines, a total of 159 (81.9%) patients reach a UCT ≥12 points, with avoidance measures 23 (11.8%) patients, antihistamines 84 (43.2%), omalizumab 35 (18%), and cyclosporine 17 (8.7%)., Conclusions: This study supports the use of a stepwise approach based on CSU guidelines for CIndU management. However, a significant proportion of patients, particularly those with CIndU only, did not achieve adequate control. This highlights the heterogeneity within CIndU and the need for further research to develop new therapies for patients with CIndU who remain uncontrolled., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: Chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU) is a group of long-persisting and challenging to manage diseases, characterized by recurrent wheals and angioedema induced by definite triggers. In this review, we address recent findings on CIndU pathogenesis, diagnosis as well as its treatment, and we discuss novel potential targets that may lead to the development of more effective therapies for CIndU patients., Recent Advances: Meaningful advances in the understanding of its pathogenesis have been reported in the last decades. Novel CIndU-specific patient-reported outcome measures enable a closer and better evaluation of patients. CIndU is a hard-to-treat disease that highly impairs quality of life (QoL) of affected patients. Provocation tests allow to diagnose CIndU subtypes. The only licensed and recommended treatment for CIndU are second generation non-sedating H1-antihistamines, which lack efficacy in many cases. Omalizumab off-label use has been assessed in all types of CIndU with overall good outcomes. Promising emerging therapies currently assessed in chronic spontaneous urticaria are paving the path for novel treatments for CIndU., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Hypersensitivity reactions to anticancer drugs include treatment-limiting toxicity. Standard drug desensitisation offers temporary tolerance and hence requires repetition. We used omalizumab, an anti-immunoglobulin E antibody, to overcome immediate and delayed hypersensitivity reactions to various anticancer drugs. Seven of the eight patients in the current study successfully resumed the desired anticancer drug regimen without standard desensitisation. No safety issues from omalizumab were observed., (© 2024 The Author(s). Internal Medicine Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australasian College of Physicians.)

Abstract: Seasonal allergies have a negative impact on patients' quality of life. Nurses must be aware of the different treatment options and lifestyle modifications to help patients manage their symptoms. This article discusses the benefits and risks of over-the-counter medications for seasonal allergies and other implications for nurses., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) affects 0.5% to 1% of the general population and is often managed by allergy and immunology specialists. Guidelines have evolved over the past several decades with an emphasis on decreasing extensive screening laboratory testing as they are of low-yield and cost-ineffective. The utility of biomarkers remains under investigation but total immunoglobulin E may be helpful in determining specific endotypes and response to omalizumab. Antihistamines and omalizumab remain the primary therapeutic options for CSU, but an expanding body of evidence supports the use of immunosuppressants and anti-inflammatory medications in refractory cases., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors declare the following competing financial interest(s): S.R. Joshi was a paid advisor for Novartis, Sanofi, Genentech, and Regeneron. K.M. Anstey and D. Khan have no financial interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Allergic rhinitis is a common childhood disease. Although various drugs have been used to treat allergic rhinitis, including nasal corticosteroids, antileukotrienes, and antihistamines, there is still controversy about the optimal dose and the best combination with the highest efficacy. Higher doses of antihistamines are recommended for better control of urticaria, but there is insufficient evidence regarding the efficacy of increased doses of antihistamines in allergic rhinitis. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of different drug combinations in the treatment of children with allergic rhinitis. Sixty-four children with persistent moderate to severe allergic rhinitis were enrolled and randomly divided into 4 groups. All children received mometasone furoate nasal spray once daily. In addition to mometasone, each group received one of the following drugs or drug combinations: daily desloratadine, twice daily desloratadine, montelukast, or a combination of desloratadine and montelukast. The severity of symptoms before and after the intervention was evaluated based on the total nasal symptoms score, including sneezing, nasal congestion, nasal itching, and rhinorrhea. Sixty patients completed the study. The reduction of nasal congestion score and total nasal symptoms score in the groups receiving desloratadine twice a day and desloratadine plus montelukast was superior to the daily desloratadine group and daily montelukast groups. According to this work, the treatment of allergic rhinitis with mometasone nasal spray with desloratadine twice a day or with the combination of desloratadine and montelukast was more effective than other treatment regimens.

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is a chronic autoimmune disease affecting the elderly population and characterized by the formation of subepidermal tense bullae. Treatment options include topical steroids, systemic steroids, immunosuppressants, and antimicrobials, and there is emerging evidence of the efficacy of omalizumab. In this study, we aimed to demonstrate omalizumab's efficacy for treating BP, and we also reported treatment-related adverse events. The retrospective cohort study included patients with BP who were followed up in our clinic's bullous diseases department between 2016 and 2023. Patients who received omalizumab were included in the study. Treatment responses of all patients were assessed by BP Disease Area Index activity and damage scores, treatment scale scoring, steroid dose reduction, and the presence/absence of pruritus. Also, total IgE levels of patients before the treatment onset and at the last visit were compared. There were 15 (male/female = 8/7) BP patients receiving omalizumab treatment. Omalizumab therapy allowed steroid dose reduction at a median of 1 month. Omalizumab (25.5 mg, 95% confidence interval 17.2-33.9, P < .001) provided a significant steroid dose reduction at the last visit compared to the beginning of treatment. Omalizumab resulted in a decrease in BP Disease Area Index activity score of 80.8 (95% confidence interval 71.8-89.8, P < .001). Also, omalizumab caused significant decline in IgE levels compared to baseline (1102.5 ± 834.5 vs 834.6 ± 613.6, P = .002). In this study, omalizumab treatment was an effective and safe option in BP patients with high baseline IgE levels who are refractory to or cannot tolerate other immunosuppressive therapies., Competing Interests: The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest L.E.R. received clinical trial funding and grants from Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma America Inc and Clinuvel Phar­maceuticals Ltd outside the submitted work. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.