Search

Background: It is not clear whether subsets of patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) benefit from intensive blood pressure (BP) lowering. We evaluated whether white matter hyperintensities (WMH) burden influences response to this therapy.Methods: Retrospective secondary analysis of the Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage 2 trial. Patients were randomized to intensive (systolic BP target: 110-139 mmHg) versus standard (systolic BP target: 140-179 mmHg) BP treatment with intravenous nicardipine within 4.5 h from onset between May 2011 and September 2015. WMH were rated on magnetic resonance images (fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequences), defining moderate-severe WMH as total Fazekas scale score ≥ 3 (range 0-6). The main outcome was death or major disability at 90 days (modified Rankin scale ≥ 3). The secondary outcome was ICH expansion, defined as hematoma growth > 33% from baseline to follow-up CT scan. Predictors of the outcomes of interest were explored with multivariable logistic regression.Results: A total of 195/1000 patients had MRI images available for analysis, of whom 161 (82.6%) had moderate-severe WMH. When compared to patients with none-mild WMH, those with moderate-severe WMH did not have an increased risk of death or major disability (adjusted relative risk: 1.83, 95% CI 0.71-4.69) or ICH expansion (adjusted relative risk: 1.14, 95% CI 0.38-3.37). WMH burden did not modify the effect of intensive BP treatment on outcome (all p for interaction ≥ 0.2).Conclusion: The majority of acute ICH patients have moderate-severe WMH, but advanced small vessel disease burden marked by WMH does not influence ICH-related outcomes or response to intensive BP reduction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]