Search

New generation therapies such as bispecific antibodies (BsAb), chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR T) and antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) have revolutionized the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, there is emerging evidence of increased infection risk associated with these treatments in clinical trials and observational settings. This infection risk may be mediated by on-target, off-tumor side effects such as cytokine release syndrome, hypogammaglobulinaemia and cytopenias, disease-related humoral impairment and the consequences of multiple previous lines of treatment. While bacterial and viral pathogens predominate, reactivation of latent infection and opportunistic infections also warrant attention. This review characterizes the epidemiology of infections associated with novel therapies for RRMM to guide prophylaxis and antimicrobial prescribing in this patient population and highlights future areas of focus to inform ongoing infection prevention strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis is essential for preventing surgical site infections (SSI); however, the clinical benefit of intraoperative redosing remains unclear and controversial owing to insufficient reliable evidence. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis to assess the effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotic redosing in lengthy surgical procedures. Methods We systematically searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Ichushi‐Web databases for articles published until 31 December, 2023. We compared the incidence of SSI between patients receiving and not receiving intraoperative redosing of antibiotics in surgeries lasting ≥3 h. Subgroup analyses were conducted across study characteristics. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the Mantel–Haenszel random effects model. The risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS‐I. Results Overall, seven observational studies involving 4,671 patients were included. Intraoperative antibiotic redosing significantly reduced the risk of SSI compared with non‐redosing (OR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.45–0.94, p = 0.02). Subgroup analyses showed that intraoperative redosing decreased SSI risk in studies with a minimum 4‐h operative time, no postoperative antibiotic continuation, and a moderate risk of bias. However, the statistical heterogeneity of the analyses was high among the studies. Conclusions Intraoperative redosing with prophylactic antibiotics during lengthy surgeries may be associated with a lower risk of SSI than non‐redosing. Therefore, we recommend intraoperative redosing for surgeries lasting beyond 3–4 h to reduce the risk of infection. Further research is required to clarify the optimal redosing interval, which should be prioritized in future studies.

Abstract Background Urinary tract catheters, including Double-J or ureteral stents, are prone to bacterial colonization forming biofilms and leading to asymptomatic bacteriuria. In the context of asymptomatic bacteriuria, endourological procedures causing mucosa-inducing lesions can lead to severe infections. Antibiotic prophylaxis is warranted, yet its efficacy is limited by biofilm formation on stents. Biofilms promote antibiotic tolerance, the capacity of genetically susceptible bacteria to survive a normally lethal dose of antimicrobial therapy. The UROPOT study evaluates the effectiveness of a first-in-type metabolism-based aminoglycoside potentiation for (i) preventing infectious complications of asymptomatic bacteriuria during mucosa lesion-inducing endourological procedures and (ii) assessing its anti-tolerance efficacy. Methods The UROPOT trial is a phase I/II single-center (Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Switzerland) randomized double-blinded trial. Over 2 years, patients with asymptomatic Escherichia coli and/or Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteriuria, undergoing endourological procedures, will be randomly allocated to one of three treatment arms (1:1:1 randomization ratio, 30 patients per group) to evaluate the efficacy of mannitol-potentiated low-dose amikacin compared to established standard treatments (ceftriaxone or amikacin standard dose). Patients will be recruited at the CHUV Urology Outpatient Clinic. The primary outcome is the comparative incidence of postoperative urinary tract infections (assessed at 48 h) between the investigational amikacin/mannitol therapy and standard (ceftriaxone or amikacin) antibiotic prophylaxis, defined by specific systemic symptoms and/or positive blood and/or urine culture. Secondary outcomes include assessing microbiological eradication through anti-biofilm activity, sustained microbiological eradication, and mannitol and antibiotics pharmacokinetics in blood and urine. Safety outcomes will evaluate the incidence of adverse events following amikacin/mannitol therapy and postoperative surgical complications at postoperative day 14. Discussion UROPOT tests a novel antimicrobial strategy based on “metabolic potentiation” for prophylaxis enabling aminoglycoside dose reduction and targeting biofilm activity. The anti-biofilm effect may prove beneficial, particularly in patients who have a permanent stent in situ needing recurrent endourological manipulations strategies in preventing infections and achieving sustained microbiological eradication in pre-stented patients. Trial registration The protocol is approved by the local ethics committee (CER-VD, 2023–01369, protocole 2.0) and the Swiss Agency for Therapeutic Products (Swissmedic, 701,676) and is registered on the NIH’s ClinicalTrials.gov (trial registration number: NCT05761405). Registered on March 07, 2023.

Background: Urinary tract catheters, including Double-J or ureteral stents, are prone to bacterial colonization forming biofilms and leading to asymptomatic bacteriuria. In the context of asymptomatic bacteriuria, endourological procedures causing mucosa-inducing lesions can lead to severe infections. Antibiotic prophylaxis is warranted, yet its efficacy is limited by biofilm formation on stents. Biofilms promote antibiotic tolerance, the capacity of genetically susceptible bacteria to survive a normally lethal dose of antimicrobial therapy. The UROPOT study evaluates the effectiveness of a first-in-type metabolism-based aminoglycoside potentiation for (i) preventing infectious complications of asymptomatic bacteriuria during mucosa lesion-inducing endourological procedures and (ii) assessing its anti-tolerance efficacy. Methods: The UROPOT trial is a phase I/II single-center (Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Switzerland) randomized double-blinded trial. Over 2 years, patients with asymptomatic Escherichia coli and/or Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteriuria, undergoing endourological procedures, will be randomly allocated to one of three treatment arms (1:1:1 randomization ratio, 30 patients per group) to evaluate the efficacy of mannitol-potentiated low-dose amikacin compared to established standard treatments (ceftriaxone or amikacin standard dose). Patients will be recruited at the CHUV Urology Outpatient Clinic. The primary outcome is the comparative incidence of postoperative urinary tract infections (assessed at 48 h) between the investigational amikacin/mannitol therapy and standard (ceftriaxone or amikacin) antibiotic prophylaxis, defined by specific systemic symptoms and/or positive blood and/or urine culture. Secondary outcomes include assessing microbiological eradication through anti-biofilm activity, sustained microbiological eradication, and mannitol and antibiotics pharmacokinetics in blood and urine. Safety outcomes will evaluate the incidence of adverse events following amikacin/mannitol therapy and postoperative surgical complications at postoperative day 14. Discussion: UROPOT tests a novel antimicrobial strategy based on "metabolic potentiation" for prophylaxis enabling aminoglycoside dose reduction and targeting biofilm activity. The anti-biofilm effect may prove beneficial, particularly in patients who have a permanent stent in situ needing recurrent endourological manipulations strategies in preventing infections and achieving sustained microbiological eradication in pre-stented patients. Trial registration: The protocol is approved by the local ethics committee (CER-VD, 2023–01369, protocole 2.0) and the Swiss Agency for Therapeutic Products (Swissmedic, 701,676) and is registered on the NIH's ClinicalTrials.gov (trial registration number: NCT05761405). Registered on March 07, 2023. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP), when used appropriately based on evidence-based guidelines, can reduce the rate of infectious complications following endourologic procedures without compromising patient outcomes. Objectives: To investigate the appropriateness of the current SAP used in endourologic surgeries based on international guidelines and report their associated outcomes (urinary tract infection [UTI] and blood stream infection [BSI]). Design: Prospective cross-sectional study. Methodology: The medical records of patients undergoing endourologic procedures were reviewed to assess healthcare providers' adherence to international guideline recommendations. Assessed parameters included indication, duration, choice, and dose of the antibiotics used in endourologic procedures in two medical centers in Amman/Jordan. Furthermore, patients were asked to conduct laboratory urine tests to determine the rate of infectious complications within one month post-procedure. Results: Three hundred and sixty-one patients were recruited for the study. The adherence rates to guidelines regarding indication, choice, and dose of pre-operative antibiotics were 90.3%, 2.8%, and 77.8%, respectively. The duration was concordant with guidelines in only 3.4% of participants. A total of 41.8% of patients completed follow-up. Among those, 4.6% developed bacterial UTIs, and 0.7% developed BSI. Conclusion: Adherence to SAP guidelines in endourologic procedures was far from optimal. Primary deviations in the implementation of guidelines' recommendations were pinpointed. These results are crucial for planning interventions that optimize SAP utilization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To evaluate risk factors for developing endophthalmitis after repair of open globe injuries. Retrospective chart analysis of 1303 patients from May 1996 till December 2019. All patients received prophylactic intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotics for 5–7 days. Endophthalmitis was clinically suspected in 37 (2.8%) eyes and was culture proven in 14 of these eyes (1.1%). Univariate analysis identified poor initial visual acuity at presentation, rural setting of injury, contaminated wound and lens injury as significant predictors for the development of clinically suspected endophthalmitis. Intravitreal antibiotics at the time of primary repair in eyes with high-risk characteristics decreased risk of developing endophthalmitis (OR: 2.28;95% CI,1.07–4.86; p =.033). Poor initial visual acuity, rural setting of injury, contaminated wound, and lens injury increased risk of suspected posttraumatic endophthalmitis. Prophylactic intravitreal antibiotics at the time of primary repair in eyes with high-risk characteristics reduced the risk of posttraumatic endophthalmitis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Our aim was to describe the frequency and severity of infectious complications after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T‐cell therapy in patients with large B‐cell lymphoma (LBCL). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed clinical records of LBCL patients treated with CD19‐targeted CAR T‐cell therapy from July/2018 to December/2021 at our institution, and identified all infectious episodes from CAR T‐cell infusion until disease progression, death or last follow‐up. Results: Overall, 137 patients were included. Thirty six percent had received ≥3 previous lines of therapy and 26% an autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto‐HCT). Cytokine release syndrome occurred in 87 (64%) patients. Antibacterial prophylaxis was not used in any patient; only 38% received antifungal prophylaxis. Sixty three infectious events were observed in 41 (30%) patients. Fifty two (83%) of the infectious events had at least one pathogen identified (bacteria [n = 38], virus [n = 11], and fungi [n = 3]). Most of the infectious events occurred during hospitalization for CAR‐T treatment. Infection‐related mortality was observed in two patients. Independent risk factors for infection included male gender, previous auto‐HCT, ≥3 lines of treatment and pre‐lymphodepletion neutropenia. Conclusions: Infections after CAR T‐cell therapy in patients with lymphoma are frequent but generally not severe. A conservative and tailored antimicrobial prophylaxis seems to be a safe approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AIM: To investigate the efficacy of antimicrobial prophylaxis (AP) for TRUS-PBx using intravenous cefmetazole (CMZ) and oral levofloxacin (LVFX). BACKGROUND: Fluoroquinolones (FQ) are currently the first choice as prophylactics for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-PBx). However, infections caused by FQ-resistant or extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing Escherichia coli remain a significant concern. Although CMZ is effective against these resistant E. coli, there are only a few reports on its use in TRUS-PBx. METHODS: This single-center retrospective observational study was conducted between January 2014 and December 2023 at Komaki City Hospital, Japan. The incidence of febrile urinary tract infection (UTI), urosepsis, bacteremia, re-admission, abscess, and healthcare-related costs after TRUS-PBx were compared between those who received a single dose of intravenous cefazolin (CEZ) and oral LVFX and single doses of intravenous CMZ and oral LVFX, from January 2014 to December 2023. The risk factors for post-TRUS-PBx febrile UTI were analyzed using multivariable logistic analysis. RESULTS: The incidence of febrile UTI after TRUS-PBx was 0.77% (9/1,168) in the CEZ + LVFX group and 0.20% (2/1,008) in the CMZ + LVFX group. Complications such as urosepsis (5 cases), bacteremia (3 cases), abscess (2 cases), and re-admission (3 cases) were observed only in the CEZ+LVFX group. The use of CMZ+LVFX as an AP significantly decreased febrile UTI after TRUS-PBx. CMZ+LVFX use reduced healthcare-related costs by JPY 975.5 (USD 6.8) per TRUS-PBx compared to CEZ+LVFX. CONCLUSIONS: Empirical AP with CMZ + LVFX before TRUS-PBx reduced the incidence of infectious complications and healthcare-related costs.

Purpose: Despite recent WHO recommendations, antibiotic prophylaxis is routinely continued for several days after surgery. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis cessation within 24 h after abdominal surgeries Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients who underwent 3 representative gastrointestinal surgeries (1; transumbilical small bowel procedure for intestinal atresia or stenosis, 2; extrahepatic bile duct resection, and hepaticojejunostomy for congenital biliary dilatation, 3; stoma closure for intestinal perforation, anorectal malformation, or inflammatory bowel disease) at our institution between 2011 and 2023. The demographic data collected included age, preoperative hemoglobin level, albumin level, body mass index, and ASA class. Intraoperative and postoperative data were also collected. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the duration of perioperative antibiotics (‘within 24 h’ and ‘beyond 24 h’), and the incidence of superficial incisional SSI (siSSI) was compared between the 2 groups in each procedure Results: During the study period, 25 cases underwent transumbilical small bowel procedure, 23 cases underwent hepaticojejunostomy, and 45 cases underwent stoma closure. The preoperative care bundle including bowel preparation, cleansing, and operative procedures has not changed during the study period. First- and third-generation cephalosporins were administered to all the patients. All patients received their first single dose of antibiotics within 60 min before the skin incision. In particular, 14 patients who underwent small-bowel procedures received only a single dose. The SSI rates for small bowel procedures, hepaticojejunostomy, and stoma closure were 0 %, 4.4 %, and 4.4 %, respectively. No SSIs were observed in any of the procedures in the 'within 24 h' group Conclusion: Based on our study, we conclude that ≤24 h of postoperative continuation of antibiotic prophylaxis is sufficient for siSSI prevention in hepaticojejunostomy and stoma closure. Additionally, single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis is adequate for neonatal small bowel procedures. Level of evidence: Level

Abstract Background Surgical site infections (SSI) are characterized by infections occurring in the surgical incision site, organ or cavity in the postoperative period. Adherence to surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) is paramount in mitigating the occurrence of SSIs. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the appropriateness of SAP use in patients undergoing surgical procedures in the field of general surgery according to the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) guideline and to determine the difference between the pre-training period (pre-TP) and the post-training period (post-TP) organized according to this guideline. Methods It is a single-center prospective study conducted in general surgery wards between January 2022 and May 2023, with 404 patients pre-TP and 406 patients post-TP. Results Cefazolin emerged as the predominant agent for SAP, favored in 86.8% (703/810) of cases. Appropriate cefazolin dosage increased significantly from 41% (129 patients) in pre-TP to 92.6% (276 patients) in post-TP (p

Background: Surgical site infections (SSI) are characterized by infections occurring in the surgical incision site, organ or cavity in the postoperative period. Adherence to surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) is paramount in mitigating the occurrence of SSIs. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the appropriateness of SAP use in patients undergoing surgical procedures in the field of general surgery according to the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) guideline and to determine the difference between the pre-training period (pre-TP) and the post-training period (post-TP) organized according to this guideline. Methods: It is a single-center prospective study conducted in general surgery wards between January 2022 and May 2023, with 404 patients pre-TP and 406 patients post-TP. Results: Cefazolin emerged as the predominant agent for SAP, favored in 86.8% (703/810) of cases. Appropriate cefazolin dosage increased significantly from 41% (129 patients) in pre-TP to 92.6% (276 patients) in post-TP (p < 0.001), along with a rise in adherence to recommended timing of administration from 42.2% (133 patients) to 62.8% (187 patients) (p < 0.001). The proportion of patients receiving antibiotics during hospitalization in the ward postoperatively decreased post-TP (21–14.3%; p = 0.012), as did antibiotic prescription at discharge (16.8–10.3%; p = 0.008). The incidence of SSI showed a slight increase from 9.9% in pre-TP to 13.3% in post-TP (p = 0.131). Conclusions: Routine training sessions for surgeons emerged as crucial strategies to optimize patient care and enhance SAP compliance rates, particularly given the burden of clinical responsibilities faced by surgical teams. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This study sought to investigate the quality of antimicrobial prescribing among adult surgical inpatients besides exploring the determinants of non-compliance and inappropriate prescribing to inform stewardship activities. Methods: A cross-sectional point prevalence study employing Hospital National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey (Hospital NAPS) was conducted in April 2019 at two teaching hospitals in Malaysia. Results: Among 566 surgical inpatients, 44.2% were receiving at least one antimicrobial, for a total of 339 prescriptions. Antimicrobials belonging to the World Health Organization's Watch group were observed in 57.8% of cases. Both hospitals exhibited similar types of antimicrobial treatments prescribed and administration routes. A significant difference in antimicrobial choice was observed between hospitals (p < 0.001). Hospital with electronic prescribing demonstrated better documentation practice (p < 0.001). Guidelines compliance, 32.8% (p = 0.952) and appropriateness, 55.2% (p = 0.561) did not significantly differ. The major contributors of inappropriateness were incorrect duration, (15%) and unnecessary broad-spectrum coverage, (15.6%). Non-compliance and inappropriate prescribing were found to be 2 to 4 times significantly higher with antimicrobial prophylaxis prescription compared to empirical therapy. Conclusion: Antimicrobial stewardship efforts to improve appropriate surgical prescribing are essential. These initiatives should prioritize surgical prophylaxis prescribing, focusing on reducing unnecessarily prolonged use and broadspectrum antimicrobials, raising awareness among prescribers and promoting proper documentation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to establish a precise preoperative high-risk factor scoring system and algorithm for antibiotic prophylaxis decision-making, provide guidance for the judicious use of AMP, refine interventions, and ensure the appropriate application of AMP for class I incisions in neurosurgery. According to PRISMA guidelines, literature searches, study selection, methodology development, and quality appraisal were performed. The quality of evidence across the study population was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A two-round Delphi expert consultation method involved 15 experts from leading tertiary hospitals in China. Establishing an algorithm of SOPs for perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis in Class I neurosurgical incisions. Thirteen studies, encompassing 11,936 patients undergoing clean neurosurgical procedures, were included. 791 patients experienced SSI, resulting in an average incidence of 6.62%. Identified risk factors significantly associated with an increased incidence of postoperative SSI (P < 0.05) included emergency surgery, preoperative hospitalization ≥7 days, intraoperative blood loss ≥300 mL, operation time ≥4 hours, diabetes mellitus, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, and repeat surgery. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated robust results for emergency surgery, intraoperative blood loss ≥300 mL, operation time ≥4 hours, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, and repeat surgery. Established a risk assessment system for Class I neurosurgical incisions by the Delphi method. Additionally, we have formulated an algorithm of SOPs for perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis in Class I neurosurgical incisions. The established index for AMP utilization and SOPs in the preoperative period of class I neurosurgical incisions proves valuable, contributing to improved patient outcomes in neurosurgical procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To assess the effect of antimicrobial prophylaxis with ampicillin-sulbactam (ABPC/SBT) compared with cefazolin (CEZ) on the short-term outcomes after esophagectomy. Background: CEZ is widely used for antimicrobial prophylaxis in esophagectomy without procedure-specific evidence, whereas ABPC/SBT is preferred in some hospitals to target both aerobic and anaerobic oral bacteria. Methods: Data of patients who underwent esophagectomy for cancer between July 2010 and March 2019 were extracted from a nationwide Japanese inpatient database. Overlap propensity score weighting was conducted to compare the short-term outcomes [including surgical site infection (SSI), anastomotic leakage, and respiratory failure] between antimicrobial prophylaxis with CEZ and ABPC/SBT after adjusting for potential confounders. Sensitivity analyses were also performed using propensity score matching and instrumental variable analyses. Results: Among 17,772 eligible patients, 16,077 (90.5%) and 1695 (9.5%) patients were administered CEZ and ABPC/SBT, respectively. SSI, anastomotic leakage, and respiratory failure occurred in 2971 (16.7%), 2604 (14.7%), and 2754 patients (15.5%), respectively. After overlap weighting, ABPC/SBT was significantly associated with a reduction in SSI [odds ratio 0.51 (95% CI: 0.43–0.60)], anastomotic leakage [0.51 (0.43–0.61)], and respiratory failure [0.66 (0.57–0.77)]. ABPC/SBT was also associated with reduced respiratory complications, postoperative length of stay, and total hospitalization costs. The proportion of Clostridioides difficile colitis and noninfectious complications did not differ between the groups. Propensity score matching and instrumental variable analyses demonstrated equivalent results. Conclusions: The administration of ABPC/SBT as antimicrobial prophylaxis for esophagectomy was associated with better short-term postoperative outcomes compared with CEZ. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This study sought to investigate the quality of antimicrobial prescribing among adult surgical inpatients besides exploring the determinants of non-compliance and inappropriate prescribing to inform stewardship activities.Methods: A cross-sectional point prevalence study employing Hospital National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey (Hospital NAPS) was conducted in April 2019 at two teaching hospitals in Malaysia.Results: Among 566 surgical inpatients, 44.2% were receiving at least one antimicrobial, for a total of 339 prescriptions. Antimicrobials belonging to the World Health Organization’s Watch group were observed in 57.8% of cases. Both hospitals exhibited similar types of antimicrobial treatments prescribed and administration routes. A significant difference in antimicrobial choice was observed between hospitals (p < 0.001). Hospital with electronic prescribing demonstrated better documentation practice (p < 0.001). Guidelines compliance, 32.8% (p = 0.952) and appropriateness, 55.2% (p = 0.561) did not significantly differ. The major contributors of inappropriateness were incorrect duration, (15%) and unnecessary broad-spectrum coverage, (15.6%). Non-compliance and inappropriate prescribing were found to be 2 to 4 times significantly higher with antimicrobial prophylaxis prescription compared to empirical therapy.Conclusion: Antimicrobial stewardship efforts to improve appropriate surgical prescribing are essential. These initiatives should prioritize surgical prophylaxis prescribing, focusing on reducing unnecessarily prolonged use and broad-spectrum antimicrobials, raising awareness among prescribers and promoting proper documentation.

BackgroundAntimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASP) have been applied widely in high-resource countries to prevent surgical site infections (SSI). Evidence favoring ASP interventions (ASPi) in gastrointestinal surgeries from low and middle-income countries has been limited, especially in antimicrobial prophylaxis. We aimed to investigate this gap at a Vietnamese tertiary hospital.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study on patients undergoing clean-contaminated surgeries in 2015 who received standard of care (SoC) or SoC + ASPi. Primary outcome was 30-day SSI incidence. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LoS) after surgery (days), cost of antibiotics, and cost of treatment (USD). Results were controlled for multiplicity and reported with treatment effect and 95% confidence interval (95%CI). A predictive model was built and cross-validated to detect patients at high risk of SSI.ResultsWe included 395 patients for analysis (48.1% being female, mean age 49.4 years). Compared to patients receiving SoC, those with SoC + ASPi had a lower incidence of 30-day SSI (−8.8, 95%CI: −16.0 to −1.6, p = 0.042), shorter LoS after surgery (−1.1 days, 95%CI: −1.8 to −0.4, p = 0.004), and lower cost of antibiotics (−37.3 USD, 95%CI: −59.8 to −14.8, p = 0.012) and treatment (−191.1 USD, 95%CI: −348.4 to −33.8, p = 0.042). We estimated that by detecting patients at high risk of SSI with the predictive model and providing prophylactic measures, we could save 398120.7 USD per 1,000 cases of SSI.ConclusionWe found that ASPi were associated with a reduction in risks of SSI, hospital stays, and cost of antibiotics/treatment in a Vietnamese tertiary hospital.

Purpose The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases guidelines recommend ciprofloxacin as a first-line option for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) prophylaxis, citing literature that is over 30 years old. There is insufficient data and guidance for prophylaxis in cases of fluoroquinolone treatment failure or intolerance. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes in patients whose antimicrobial prophylaxis was switched from first-line therapies to an alternative agent versus those who were not switched following recurrent SBP. Methods This study was an institutional review board–approved retrospective chart review of patients admitted to University of Kentucky HealthCare from 2014 through 2020. Patients included were 18 years of age or older with a diagnosis of recurrent SBP. The primary outcome examined was SBP recurrence rate following initial prophylaxis failure. Additional analyses targeted secondary outcomes, including 6-month mortality, development of SBP complications, development of an adverse drug reaction, and development of multidrug-resistant pathogens. Results Fifty-three patients were identified with recurrent SBP and divided into 2 cohorts: 25 patients were switched from their original prophylactic agent while 28 patients continued on the same agent after SBP recurrence. Patients in the switch group had lower rates of recurrence (52% vs 100%). Additionally, these patients had lower 6-month mortality rates (24% vs 57.1%; P = 0.015). Thirteen patients in the no-switch group and 3 patients in the switch group required intensive care on a subsequent admission (46.4% vs 12%; P = 0.008). There were no significant differences between the groups in rates of other SBP complications. Conclusion Patients switched from their original prophylactic agent had lower rates of SBP recurrence with significantly lower 6-month mortality rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Appropriate administration of perioperative antibiotics can prevent antimicrobial resistance, adverse drug events, surgical site infections, and increased costs to the health care system for many surgeries in Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery (OHNS). Objective: The objective of the study is to achieve 90% compliance with evidence‐based perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines among elective surgical procedures in OHNS. Methods: The pre‐intervention group consisted of patients undergoing elective surgical procedures in the 13 months prior to the interventions (September 2019–2020) whereas the post‐intervention group comprised patients undergoing elective procedures during the 8 months following the implementation (October 2020–May 2021). The 4 Es of knowledge translation and the Donabedian framework were used to frame the study. Components of the intervention included educational grand rounds and automatic substitutions in electronic health records. In June 2021, a survey of staff and residents assessed the self‐reported perception of following evidence‐based guidelines. Results: Compliance with antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines were evaluated based on agent and dose. The overall compliance improved from 38.8% pre‐intervention to 59.0% post‐intervention (p < 0.001). Agent compliance did not improve from pre‐ to post‐intervention, that is, 60.7% to 62.8%, respectively, (p = 0.68), whereas dose compliance improved from 39.6% to 89.2% (p < 0.001). Approximately 78.5% of survey respondents felt that they strongly agreed or agreed with always following evidence‐based antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines. Conclusion: Compliance with antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines improved, primarily due to increased dosing compliance. Future interventions will target agent compliance and selected procedures with lower compliance rates. Level of Evidence: 3 Laryngoscope, 133:3403–3408, 2023 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: In the context of COVID-19, patients with a severe or critical illness may be more susceptible to developing secondary bacterial infections. This study aims to investigate the relationship between the use of prophylactic antibiotic therapy and the occurrence of bacterial or fungal isolates following the administration of tocilizumab in hospitalized COVID-19 patients who had previously received steroids during the first and second waves of the pandemic in Spain. Methods: This retrospective observational study included 70 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 who received tocilizumab and steroids between January and December 2020. Data on demographics, comorbidities, laboratory tests, microbiologic results, treatment, and outcomes were collected from electronic health records. The patients were divided into two groups based on the use of antibiotic prophylaxis, and the incidence of bacterial and fungal colonizations/infections was analyzed. Results: Among the included patients, 45 patients received antibiotic prophylaxis. No significant clinical differences were observed between the patients based on prophylaxis use regarding the number of clinically diagnosed infections, ICU admissions, or mortality rates. However, the patients who received antibiotic prophylaxis showed a higher incidence of colonization by multidrug-resistant bacteria compared to that of the subgroup that did not receive prophylaxis. The most commonly isolated microorganisms were Candida albicans, Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Conclusions: In this cohort of hospitalized COVID-19 patients treated with tocilizumab and steroids, the use of antibiotic prophylaxis did not reduce the incidence of secondary bacterial infections. However, it was associated with an increased incidence of colonization by multidrug-resistant bacteria. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are an internationally recognized strategy for reducing antimicrobial resistance while maintaining patient safety. ASP activities include the restriction of broad-spectrum antibiotics, the establishment of hospital guidelines based on antibiograms, and the promotion of appropriate antibiotic use. This study aimed to determine whether the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship practices improved the effects of a peri-procedure antibiotic prophylaxis prescribed by urologists for patients with spinal cord injury/disease (SCI/D) undergoing minor urological procedures at a tertiary care hospital. Methods This single-group, quasi-experiment study included adult patients with SCI/D who required minor urological procedures (cystoscopy, cytobotox, cystolitholapaxy, and urodynamic study) and who were hospitalized between 2012 and 2020. Results In total, 233 patients were included in each of the pre- and post-ASP implantation groups. There was a significant reduction in antibiotic use among patients who received a pre-procedure antimicrobial prophylaxis in the post- compared to the pre-implementation group (45.9% vs. 24.46%, p

Fluoroquinolones (FQs) have been traditionally used for prophylaxis against bacterial infection. However, the rapid emergence of FQ-resistant Escherichia coli due to overuse and misuse have resulted in an increase in post-biopsy infections. We requested 723 patients undergoing transrectal or transrectal plus transperineal targeted prostate biopsy to provide preprocedure rectal swabs. The rectal swabs were plated onto deoxycholate hydrogen sulfate lactose agar culture and FQ resistance tests were conducted using the disc diffusion method following the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. All patients undergoing biopsy were given a 1.0 g intravenous injection of cefmetazole (CMZ) 30 min before and 12 h after biopsy. Patients with FQ-resistant organisms received an additional 1.0 g intravenous injection of CMZ every 12 h for an additional 1.5 days, while those without FQ-resistant organisms received levofloxacin 500 mg for 4 days. We evaluated infectious symptoms during the 30 days after the biopsy. We also evaluated the incidence of acute prostatitis within 7 days after the biopsy and isolation rates of FQ-resistant strains. A total of 289 patients (40%) had FQ-resistant isolates on rectal swabs. The overall infectious complication rate was 0.69%. Two patients with FQ-resistant isolates and three patients without them experienced infectious episodes. One patient with FQ-resistant isolates and two patients without them suffered acute prostatitis. The difference in the rates of infectious complication and acute prostatitis rates between FQ-resistant and FQ-susceptible carriers were not significant (p = 1.0 and 1.0, respectively). Post-biopsy sepsis was identified in one patient (0.14%) who had FQ-resistant Escherichia coli. Targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis with cefmetazole based on presence of FQ-resistant isolates on rectal swabs may prevent post-prostate biopsy infectious complications, especially in geographic lesions with a high incidence of FQ-resistant strains in rectal flora.

Abstract Background The prophylactic use of antimicrobials and zinc oxide (ZnO) in pig production was prohibited by the European Union in 2022 due to potential associations between antimicrobial and heavy metal usage with antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and concerns regarding environmental pollution. However, the effects of their usage on the bacterial AMR profiles on commercial pig farms are still not fully understood and previous studies examining the effect of ZnO have reported contrasting findings. The objective of this study was to examine the effects of antimicrobial and ZnO usage on AMR on commercial pig farms. Faecal and environmental samples were taken on 10 Irish commercial farms, of which 5 farms regularly used ZnO and antimicrobials (amoxicillin or sulphadiazine-trimethoprim) for the prevention of disease. The other 5 farms did not use ZnO or any other form of prophylaxis. Escherichia coli numbers were quantified from all samples using non-supplemented and supplemented Tryptone Bile X-glucuronide agar. Results In total 351 isolates were phenotypically analysed, and the genomes of 44 AmpC/ESBL-producing E. coli isolates from 4 farms were characterised using whole-genome sequencing. Phenotypic analysis suggested higher numbers of multi-drug resistant (MDR) E. coli isolates on farms using prophylaxis. Furthermore, farms using prophylaxis were associated with higher numbers of isolates resistant to apramycin, trimethoprim, tetracycline, streptomycin, and chloramphenicol, while resistance to ciprofloxacin was more associated with farms not using any prophylaxis. Thirty-four of the 44 AmpC/ESBL-producing E. coli strains harboured the bla CTX-M-1 resistance gene and were multi drug resistant (MDR). Moreover, network analysis of plasmids and analysis of integrons showed that antimicrobial and biocide resistance genes were frequently co-located on mobile genetic elements, indicating the possibility for co-selection during antimicrobial or biocide usage as a contributor to AMR occurrence and persistence on farms. Conclusions The results of this study showed evidence that antimicrobial and ZnO treatment of pigs post-weaning can favour the selection and development of AMR and MDR E. coli. Co-location of resistance genes on mobile genetic elements was observed. This study demonstrated the usefulness of phenotypic and genotypic detection of antimicrobial resistance by combining sequencing and microbiological methods.

Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) is the most common reason for patient readmission after surgery. Because most cases of surgical site infection are preventable with antimicrobial prophylaxis, adherence to appropriate guidelines is critical. The aim of this study was to evaluate adherence to guideline recommendations for antimicrobial prophylaxis of surgical site infections at Shahid Chamran Heart Hospital, Isfahan, Iran. Methods: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted using prospective data collected from December 2021 to June 2022 in the cardiac surgery ward of Chamran Hospital. Adherence to "Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery (2013)" was assessed using data from patient records regarding the type, dosage, timing, and duration of antimicrobial prophylaxis. Results: A total of 363 patients were included in this study. The compliance rate with the guideline in terms of the type, dosing, initiation time, redosing and duration of the antimicrobial agent was 99.72%, 1.6%, 98.8%, 29.28%, and 0% respectively.Conclusion: The present study revealed relatively low adherence to the guidelines in terms of dosing, re-dosing and duration of antimicrobial prophylaxis at Chamran Heart Hospital. Based on the results, developing a local guideline is highly recommended.

Introduction: Surgical site infections (SSI) remain a leading cause of hospital-acquired infections globally. Despite proven efficacy of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) in the reduction of SSI, adherence to SAP guidelines is inconsistent. Methods: A single centre cross-sectional survey study was conducted using a peer-reviewed questionnaire to assess the knowledge, practice and awareness of SAP guidelines among perioperative clinicians at a tertiary hospital in South Africa. Results: Of the 273 invitations sent, 153 responses were completed for analysis. The mean (SD) knowledge score was 72.5% (8.1) but knowledge on dosage, timing and redosing was poor. SAP practices among participants were adequate, except for procedures that are controversial or require complex antimicrobial cover. Registrars and specialists scored significantly higher mean knowledge scores compared to medical officers. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean knowledge scores of different disciplines. Only 50% of participants reported using a SAP guideline. More than 80% of the participants agreed that their practice would improve if guidelines were readily accessible in the operating theatre and if an effective SSI surveillance system was in place. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the overall SAP knowledge and practice was fair, but core principles such as dosing, timing and duration of SAP were inadequate and need urgent attention. We recommend that through a multidisciplinary collaborative effort, a recognised guideline should be adapted and introduced, and awareness of correct SAP practices promoted at Tygerberg Hospital. Furthermore, the introduction of a surveillance system will help improve the quality of surgical care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi is the property of KARE Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background and Aims: Antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended for cirrhotic patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). However, the frequency of bacterial infection in such patients has remarkably decreased over the decades, which has reduced the necessity for prophylaxis. Therefore, here we investigated the real-world adherence and effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in cirrhotic patients with UGIB in Japan. Methods: This population-based study was conducted with a Japanese real-world database of the Health, Clinic, and Education Information Evaluation Institute. We enrolled cirrhotic patients who were hospitalized for UGIB between April 2010 and March 2020. After those who died within 24 h and who had aspiration pneumonia at admission were excluded, 1232 patients were analyzed. Rates of 6-week mortality, in-hospital bacterial infection, 30-day readmission, and length of hospital stay were evaluated. Results: Prophylactic antibiotics were prescribed in 142 (11.5%) patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that antibiotic prophylaxis was not significantly associated with either 6-week mortality or bacterial infection. After propensity score matching, the rates of 6-week mortality (7.2% vs. 8.4%, P = 0.810), bacterial infection (9.6% vs. 4.2%, P = 0.082), and 30-day unexpected readmission (7.2% vs. 7.8%, P = 1.000) were similar in patients with and without prophylaxis, whereas the median length of hospital stay was significantly longer in patients with prophylaxis (17 days vs. 13 days, P = 0.013). Conclusions: Under current real-world circumstances in Japan, prophylactic antibiotics were prescribed in only 11.5% of cirrhotic patients with UGIB and were not associated with better clinical outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Fluoroquinolones (FQs) have been traditionally used for prophylaxis against bacterial infection. However, the rapid emergence of FQ-resistant Escherichia coli due to overuse and misuse have resulted in an increase in post-biopsy infections. We requested 723 patients undergoing transrectal or transrectal plus transperineal targeted prostate biopsy to provide preprocedure rectal swabs. The rectal swabs were plated onto deoxycholate hydrogen sulfate lactose agar culture and FQ resistance tests were conducted using the disc diffusion method following the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. All patients undergoing biopsy were given a 1.0 g intravenous injection of cefmetazole (CMZ) 30 min before and 12 h after biopsy. Patients with FQ-resistant organisms received an additional 1.0 g intravenous injection of CMZ every 12 h for an additional 1.5 days, while those without FQ-resistant organisms received levofloxacin 500 mg for 4 days. We evaluated infectious symptoms during the 30 days after the biopsy. We also evaluated the incidence of acute prostatitis within 7 days after the biopsy and isolation rates of FQ-resistant strains. A total of 289 patients (40%) had FQ-resistant isolates on rectal swabs. The overall infectious complication rate was 0.69%. Two patients with FQ-resistant isolates and three patients without them experienced infectious episodes. One patient with FQ-resistant isolates and two patients without them suffered acute prostatitis. The difference in the rates of infectious complication and acute prostatitis rates between FQ-resistant and FQ-susceptible carriers were not significant (p = 1.0 and 1.0, respectively). Post-biopsy sepsis was identified in one patient (0.14%) who had FQ-resistant Escherichia coli. Targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis with cefmetazole based on presence of FQ-resistant isolates on rectal swabs may prevent post-prostate biopsy infectious complications, especially in geographic lesions with a high incidence of FQ-resistant strains in rectal flora. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are an internationally recognized strategy for reducing antimicrobial resistance while maintaining patient safety. ASP activities include the restriction of broad-spectrum antibiotics, the establishment of hospital guidelines based on antibiograms, and the promotion of appropriate antibiotic use. This study aimed to determine whether the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship practices improved the effects of a peri-procedure antibiotic prophylaxis prescribed by urologists for patients with spinal cord injury/disease (SCI/D) undergoing minor urological procedures at a tertiary care hospital. Methods: This single-group, quasi-experiment study included adult patients with SCI/D who required minor urological procedures (cystoscopy, cytobotox, cystolitholapaxy, and urodynamic study) and who were hospitalized between 2012 and 2020. Results: In total, 233 patients were included in each of the pre- and post-ASP implantation groups. There was a significant reduction in antibiotic use among patients who received a pre-procedure antimicrobial prophylaxis in the post- compared to the pre-implementation group (45.9% vs. 24.46%, p < 0.0001), and there was a highly significant reduction in the post- compared to the pre-implementation group in the number who received a post-procedure prophylaxis (16.7% vs. 1.2%, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: ASP implementation is a highly effective strategy for reducing the use of peri-procedure antimicrobial prophylaxes in patients with SCI/D injuries undergoing minor urological procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cephalosporins are used as first-line antimicrobial prophylaxis for orthopedics surgeries. However, alternative antibiotics are usually used in the presence of penicillin allergy (PA), which might increase the risk of surgical site infection (SSI). This study aimed to analyze the relationship between SSI after orthopedic surgeries and PA among surgical candidates and related alternative antibiotic use. Methods: In this single-center retrospective cohort study, we compared inpatients with and without PA from January 2015 to December 2021. The primary outcome was SSI, and the secondary outcomes were SSI sites and perioperative antibiotic use. Moreover, pathogen characteristics of all SSIs were also compared between the two cohorts. Results: Among the 20,022 inpatient records, 1704 (8.51%) were identified with PA, and a total of 111 (0.55%) SSI incidents were reported. Compared to patients without PA, patients with PA had higher postoperative SSI risk (1.06%, 18/1704 vs. 0.51%, 93/18318), shown both in multivariable regression analysis (odds ratio [OR] 2.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-3.50; p= 0.004) and propensity score matching (OR 1.84; 95% CI, 1.05-3.23; p= 0.034). PA was related to elevated deep SSI risk (OR 2.79; 95% CI, 1.47-5.30; p= 0.002) and had no significant impact on superficial SSI (OR 1.39; 95% CI, 0.59-3.29; p= 0.449). The PA group used significantly more alternative antibiotics. Complete mediation effect of alternative antibiotics on SSI among these patients was found in mediation analysis. Pathogen analysis revealed gram-positive cocci as the most common pathogen for SSI in our study cohort, while patients with PA had higher infection rate from gram-positive rods and gram-negative rods than non-PA group. Conclusion: Compared to patients without PA, patients with PA developed more SSI after orthopedic surgeries, especially deep SSI. The elevated infection rate could be secondary to the use of alternative prophylactic antibiotics [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are a considerable cause of patient morbidity and mortality and are associated with increased hospital lengths of stay as well as increased health care costs to both patients and health care facilities. Substantial advances have been made in infection control practices throughout the perioperative setting to prevent SSIs and improve patient quality of care. Preventing and reducing SSIs requires a multifaceted approach encompassing the continuum of medical and surgical care. This article reviews four major infection prevention guidelines and provides an updated summary of effective strategies that perioperative team members can implement for the prevention of SSIs preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The aim of our survey was to analyze the current attitudes toward antimicrobial prophylaxis in heart transplanting centers worldwide. Methods: The survey was composed of a total of 50 questions, it consisted of four different sections as follows. The first section collected physicians' personal data and centers' general characteristics, second assessed the approach to patients colonized with multidrug‐resistant organisms (MDROs), while the third consisted of the infection risk related to cardiovascular devices, and antimicrobial treatment data, the last focused on donor's colonization. Results: A total of 56 answers from 26 different countries were collected, mostly from Europe (n = 30) and the USA (n = 16). A first‐generation cephalosporin (58.9%) or a combination therapy with vancomycin (10.7%) were the most frequently prescribed antimicrobial prophylaxis. Roughly 30% of the centers used different antimicrobial prophylaxis,mostly including Gram negative bacteria coverage. The frequency of screening for multidrug resistant Gram‐negative bacteria was higher in Europe, where the percentage of centers providing screening for extended spectrum beta‐lactamase (46.7%) and carbapenem‐resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) (53.3%) was higher than in other geographic area (p =.019; p =.013, respectively). Conclusion: This survey highlights a heterogeneity of clinical practice concerning antimicrobial prophylaxis at transplant. The concern for potential Gram‐negative bacteria infection was responsible for broader antimicrobial coverage in 30% of centers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cutibacterium acnes is a common pathogen leading to postoperative shoulder infections. Many centers are utilizing 5% topical benzoyl peroxide (BPO) gel to decrease cutibacterium acnes bioburden prior to surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient compliance, tolerance, and side effects of applying BPO to the shoulder prior to surgery. Our hypothesis was that BPO would be well tolerated with few, minor side effects, and patients would comply with a regimen of 5 treatments spanning 48 hours prior to surgery. Methods: All patients undergoing operative intervention, either open or arthroscopic, about the shoulder from August 7, 2020, through July 15, 2021, by a single surgeon were instructed to apply BPO to the shoulder after showering, on dry skin, in the morning and evening, starting 48 hours before their surgical date. Patients were instructed to apply a half-dollar-sized quantity for each treatment. There were a total of 5 topical applications. On the day of surgery, patients were given a 6-question survey regarding side effects experienced, BPO treatments missed, ease of treatment, and a scenario question. Demographic information was collected, and a satisfaction survey was administered upon study completion. Results: A total of 183 patients out of a possible 284 eligible patients (64.4%) completed the survey. The median (interquartile range) age at surgery was 59.9 years. Sixty-four participants (35%) in the study cohort were female. One-hundred thirteen (61.7%) had an arthroscopic surgical approach, whereas 70 (38.3%) underwent open shoulder surgery. Most patients (N = 152, 83.5%) experienced no side effects from the topical 5% BPO gel treatments. Twenty-two (12.0%) patients missed 1 treatment, 10 (5.5%) missed 2 treatments, 1 (0.5%) missed 3 treatments, 3 (1.6%) missed 4 treatments, and 4 (2.2%) missed all 5 treatments. The majority of patients, 143 (78.1%), completed all 5 treatments. When prompted to choose between serial skin preparation treatments at home leading up to surgery or a single light-based decolonization procedure in the preoperative holding area on the day of surgery, 111 (60.7%) preferred to undergo antimicrobial treatment at home and arrive for surgery as otherwise scheduled. Conclusion: Serial preoperative applications of topical 5% BPO gel are well tolerated by the majority of patients. Over 20% of patients missed at least one application of BPO. Most patients prefer home-based antimicrobial treatments compared with arriving earlier on the day of surgery for a single light-based antimicrobial treatment.

Abstract Background Surgical site infections are common. Risk can be reduced substantially with appropriate preoperative antimicrobial administration. In 2005, the VA implemented the Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) in the setting of high rates of non-compliance with antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines. SCIP included public reporting of evidenced-based antimicrobial guideline compliance metrics in high-risk surgeries. SCIP was highly successful and led to high rates of adoption of preoperative antimicrobials and early discontinuation of postoperative antimicrobials (>95%). The program was retired in 2015, as the manual measurement and reporting process was costly with limited expected additional benefit. To our knowledge, no studies have assessed whether the gains achieved by SCIP were sustained since active support for the program was discontinued. Furthermore, there has been no investigation of the spread of antimicrobial prophylaxis guideline adoption beyond the limited set of procedures that were included in the program. Methods Using a mixed methods sequential exploratory approach, this study will (1) quantitatively measure compliance with SCIP metrics over time and across all procedures in the five major surgical specialties targeted by SCIP and (2) collect qualitative data from stakeholders to identify strategies that were effective for sustaining compliance. Diffusion of Innovation Theory will guide assessment of whether improvements achieved spread to procedures not included under the umbrella of the program. Electronic algorithms to measure SCIP antimicrobial use will be adapted from previously developed methodology. These highly novel data mining algorithms leverage the rich VA electronic health record and capture structured and text data and represent a substantial technological advancement over resource-intensive manual chart review or incomplete electronic surveillance based on pharmacy data. An interrupted time series analysis will be used to assess whether SCIP compliance was sustained following program discontinuation. Generalized linear models will be used to assess whether compliance with appropriate prophylaxis increased in all SCIP targeted and non-targeted procedures by specialty over the duration the program’s active reporting. The Dynamic Sustainability Framework will guide the qualitative methods to assess intervention, provider, facility, specialty, and contextual factors associated with sustainability over time. Barriers and facilitators to sustainability will be mapped to implementation strategies and the study will yield an implementation playbook to guide future sustainment efforts. Relevance Sustainability of practice change has been described as one of the most important, but least studied areas of clinical medicine. Learning how practices spread is also a critically important area of investigation. This study will use novel informatics strategies to evaluate factors associated with sustainability following removal of active policy surveillance and advance our understanding about these important, yet understudied, areas.

Background/purpose: The epidemiology of infective endocarditis (IE) is under constant change due to the aging society and increases in antimicrobial-resistant pathogens. However, IE remains severe. This study aimed to review the current clinical characteristics of IE and the antimicrobial susceptibility of oral bacteria (OB) isolated from blood cultures to implement appropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis. Materials and methods: We retrospectively investigated the clinical features of 180 patients with IE in whom OB and pathogens except OB (eOB) were identified as causative microorganisms via blood cultures. The susceptibility of the OB group to eight antibiotics was examined by broth microdilution. Results: Among causative microorganisms, the isolation rate of staphylococci was slightly higher than that of OB; however, the difference was not significant (36.7% vs. 33.8%, p = 0.3203). The number of patients with underlying cardiac disease was significantly higher in the OB group than in the eOB group (53.7% vs. 34.1%, p = 0.0113). Only one ampicillin-resistant OB was detected (2.0%). OBs were significantly less susceptible to clarithromycin and azithromycin than to ampicillin (98.0% vs. 66.7% and 98.0% vs. 60.0%, p = 0.0003 and p = 0.0003, respectively). Moreover, OBs were significantly less susceptible to clarithromycin and azithromycin than to clindamycin (66.7% vs. 88.2% and 60.0% vs. 88.2%, p = 0.0301 and p = 0.0217, respectively). Conclusion: OBs were susceptible to ampicillin. However, the susceptibility of OBs to clarithromycin and azithromycin was significantly lower than that to ampicillin and clindamycin. These results are important and should help decisions regarding guide antimicrobial prophylaxis.

Background: Emergency laparotomy for abdominal trauma is associated with high rates of surgical site infection (SSI). A protocol for antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) for trauma laparotomy was implemented to determine whether SSI could be reduced by adhering to established principles of AMP. Patients and Methods: A protocol utilizing ertapenem administered immediately before initiation of trauma laparotomy was adopted. Compliance with measures of adequate AMP were determined before and after protocol implementation, as were rates of SSI and other infections related to abdominal trauma. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to determine risk factors for development of infection related to trauma laparotomy. Results: Over a four-year period, 320 patient operations were reviewed. Ertapenem use for prophylaxis increased to 54% in the post-intervention cohort. Compliance with individual measures of appropriate AMP improved modestly. Overall, infections related to trauma laparotomy decreased by 46% (absolute decrease of 13%) in the post-intervention cohort. Multivariable analysis confirmed that treatment during the post-intervention phase was associated with this decrease, with a separate analysis suggesting that ertapenem use was an important factor in this decrease. Conclusions: Development of a standardized protocol for AMP in trauma laparotomy led to decreases in infectious complications after that procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Compliance with guideline recommendations for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) in colorectal surgery, particularly redosing, has been suboptimal at many institutions including ours. This study aimed to evaluate if single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis with ertapenem improves compliance with guideline recommendations for SAP versus multiple-dose antibiotic prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery. Methods: A retrospective, cohort study of the use of ertapenem compared with standard of care antibiotic agents was performed in adult patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery at an academic medical center between January 2020 and February 2022. The primary outcome was compliance with guideline-recommended SAP for colorectal surgery. The secondary outcome was surgical site infections (SSIs) within 30 days after surgery. Results: A total of 135 patients were included in this study. Fifty-eight patients received single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis with ertapenem and 77 patients received multiple-dose antibiotic prophylaxis. Cefazolin plus metronidazole was the most common multiple-dose regimen (65 of 77). Single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis with ertapenem increased overall SAP compliance (96.6% vs. 64.9%; p < 0.001) as well as compliance with antibiotic administration within the recommended time period before incision (96.6% vs. 84.4%; p = 0.022), compliance with intra-operative antibiotic redosing when warranted (100% vs. 83.1%; p < 0.001), and compliance with guideline-recommended dosing (100% vs. 92.2%; p = 0.037). Surgical site infection rates were not statistically different between the groups (12.1% vs. 19.4%; p = 0.248). Conclusions: Single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis with ertapenem increased compliance with guideline-recommended SAP for elective colorectal surgeries. No statistically significant difference was observed in SSI rates regardless of the antibiotic regimen used. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The prophylactic use of antimicrobials and zinc oxide (ZnO) in pig production was prohibited by the European Union in 2022 due to potential associations between antimicrobial and heavy metal usage with antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and concerns regarding environmental pollution. However, the effects of their usage on the bacterial AMR profiles on commercial pig farms are still not fully understood and previous studies examining the effect of ZnO have reported contrasting findings. The objective of this study was to examine the effects of antimicrobial and ZnO usage on AMR on commercial pig farms. Faecal and environmental samples were taken on 10 Irish commercial farms, of which 5 farms regularly used ZnO and antimicrobials (amoxicillin or sulphadiazine-trimethoprim) for the prevention of disease. The other 5 farms did not use ZnO or any other form of prophylaxis. Escherichia coli numbers were quantified from all samples using non-supplemented and supplemented Tryptone Bile X-glucuronide agar. Results: In total 351 isolates were phenotypically analysed, and the genomes of 44 AmpC/ESBL-producing E. coli isolates from 4 farms were characterised using whole-genome sequencing. Phenotypic analysis suggested higher numbers of multi-drug resistant (MDR) E. coli isolates on farms using prophylaxis. Furthermore, farms using prophylaxis were associated with higher numbers of isolates resistant to apramycin, trimethoprim, tetracycline, streptomycin, and chloramphenicol, while resistance to ciprofloxacin was more associated with farms not using any prophylaxis. Thirty-four of the 44 AmpC/ESBL-producing E. coli strains harboured the blaCTX-M-1 resistance gene and were multi drug resistant (MDR). Moreover, network analysis of plasmids and analysis of integrons showed that antimicrobial and biocide resistance genes were frequently co-located on mobile genetic elements, indicating the possibility for co-selection during antimicrobial or biocide usage as a contributor to AMR occurrence and persistence on farms. Conclusions: The results of this study showed evidence that antimicrobial and ZnO treatment of pigs post-weaning can favour the selection and development of AMR and MDR E. coli. Co-location of resistance genes on mobile genetic elements was observed. This study demonstrated the usefulness of phenotypic and genotypic detection of antimicrobial resistance by combining sequencing and microbiological methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: An inappropriately slow heart rate can lead to exercise intolerance, collapsing episodes, sudden death and congestive heart failure. Pacemaker implantation is often the only effective therapy to treat these cardiac rhythm disturbances. Unfortunately, pacemaker implantation can have various complications, among others bacterial infection. The best way to clear the infection is to remove the pacemaker, and treat the patient with antibiotics for several weeks before the pacemaker can be re-implanted. Though pacemaker-removal can control the infection, the clinical signs of the slow heart rate will recur and remain uncontrolled. The present case describes a 13.5-year-old dog that got a surgical site infection after pacemaker implantation. Though the first course of antibiotics resolved the clinical signs, the infection recurred. To identify the causative bacteria, the swelling under the skin caused by the bacterial infection was punctured under ultrasound-guidance to gain a sample for laboratory testing. Based on a number of considerations, another antibiotic was chosen, which successfully cleared the infection without the need of pacemaker removal. After completion of this 4-week long antibiotic course, the dog remained free of infection and free from the previously noted clinical signs thanks to the appropriately functioning pacemaker. Though permanent pacemaker implantation is the only effective therapy for certain bradyarrhythmias in dogs, it is not without risks. Bacterial infection of the device is one of the most common complications. Human guidelines recommend besides systemic antibiotics, surgical explantation of the pacing lead and pulse generator in case of device-infection. This report describes a 13.5-year-old dog that received a transvenous endocardial permanent pacemaker because of syncopal episodes resulting from paroxysmal third-degree atrio-ventricular block. Five days after an uneventful surgery, a painful swelling appeared around the subcutaneous part of the lead where this was inserted into the jugular vein. A 4-week course of amoxicillin and clavulanic acid combined with enrofloxacin failed to clear the infection on long-term. Ultrasound-guided puncture of the abscess was performed to gain a sample for bacterial culture and antibiogram. Oral clindamycin of 4 weeks' duration successfully resolved the infection with Staphylococcus aureus without having to explant the device. Repeated ultrasonographic examinations and fine-needle aspiration biopsies were used to evaluate for persistent local inflammation, guiding the length of the antibiotic therapy. Though the described approach has traditionally been ill-advised because of the risk of introducing bacteria and damaging the pacemaker lead, it was successful in our case. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Fluoroquinolones (FQ) are currently the first choice as prophylactics for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-PBx). However, infections caused by FQ-resistant or extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing Escherichia coli remain a significant concern. Although cefmetazole (CMZ) is effective against these resistant E. coli strains, there are only a few reports on its use in TRUS-PBx. We investigated the efficacy of antimicrobial prophylaxis (AP) for TRUS-PBx using intravenous CMZ and oral levofloxacin (LVFX)., Methods: This single-center retrospective observational before-and-after study was conducted between January 2014 and December 2023 at Komaki City Hospital, Japan. The incidence of febrile urinary tract infection (UTI), urosepsis, bacteremia, readmission, abscess, and healthcare-related costs after TRUS-PBx were compared between individuals who received a single dose of intravenous cefazolin (CEZ) and oral LVFX and those who received single doses of intravenous CMZ and oral LVFX. The risk factors for post-TRUS-PBx febrile UTI were analyzed using multivariable logistic analysis., Results: The incidence of febrile UTI after TRUS-PBx was 0.77% (9/1,168) in the CEZ+LVFX group and 0.20% (2/1,008) in the CMZ+LVFX group. Complications such as urosepsis (5 cases), bacteremia (3 cases), abscess (2 cases), and readmission (3 cases) were observed only in the CEZ+LVFX group. Multivariable analysis indicated that the use of CMZ+LVFX significantly decreased febrile UTI after TRUS-PBx (odds ratio: 0.20, 95% confidence interval: 0.04-0.98, P = 0.047). CMZ+LVFX use reduced healthcare-related costs by JPY 975.5 (USD 6.8) per TRUS-PBx compared to CEZ+LVFX., Conclusions: Empirical AP with CMZ+LVFX before TRUS-PBx reduced the incidence of infectious complications and healthcare-related costs., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Antibiotic prophylaxis for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBPPr) in patients with cirrhosis has been considered standard of care since the 1990s and is currently recommended by several major gastroenterological societies. However, the evidence supporting this practice is weak and there is no clear mortality benefit. The unintended consequences of this strategy are not insignificant, both at the patient and population level. Recent evidence suggests that SBPPr may even cause harm. Since the widespread implementation of SBPPr three decades ago, our overall approach to antibiotic use has shifted. We now recognize the growing threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), the potential harms of antibiotics, and the vital role of antimicrobial stewardship. In light recent developments and evidence, there is an urgent need for infectious disease, antimicrobial stewardship, and hepatology leaders to collaborate to develop an updated and cohesive approach to SBPPr., (© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction: Fishhook injuries are a common occurrence among anglers. There are no guidelines for prophylactic antibiotic use after fishhook removal. This study analyzed the management of embedded fishhooks, prophylactic antibiotic use, and complication rate at a Michigan county emergency department to observe whether antibiotic use changes patient outcome. Commentary on a freshwater pathogen ( Aeromonas hydrophila ) is also included., Methods: Cases were obtained through a retrospective chart review of patients seen for fishhook injury between 2016 and 2022. We analyzed age, sex, relevant medical history, type of fishhook, site preparation, removal technique, antibiotic use, return visit within 30 days, and complications., Results: Fifty-one patients with fishhooks injuries were identified. Mean age was 48±17 y. Forty-three patients were male (84%), and 8 were female (16%). Hook site varied, with most occurring in the finger/thumb (78.4%) and scalp (5.9%). One case involved the ear cartilage. The most common removal technique was the advance and cut method (52.9%). Four patients had an immunocompromising condition (eg, diabetes). Oral antibiotics were prescribed to 26 patients (51%) on discharge. Prophylactic antibiotic choice varied-cephalexin predominated (61.5%). There were no wound infections or complications in cases where the fishhook was removed during the emergency department encounter (50 of 51). One case involved a delayed presentation, abscess formation, and outpatient hand surgery referral., Conclusions: In this small observational study, antibiotic prophylaxis for freshwater-associated fishhook injury did not change outcome regardless of fishhook location or presence of an immunocompromising condition. Further controlled studies are needed to determine the validity of these findings.