Search

Purpose – Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is common in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and obesity. Stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has been proposed as a non-invasive tool for detection of CMD. The aim of this study was to determine relationship between CMD and diastolic function in patients with HFpEF using a novel CMR technique. Methods – Patients with obesity and HFpEF without epicardial coronary artery disease (CAD) underwent Doppler echocardiography to measure diastolic function, followed by vasodilator stress CMR, using a single bolus, dual sequence, quantitative myocardial perfusion mapping to measure myocardial blood flow (MBF) at rest and at peak hyperemia. With this, myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR), global stress endocardial-to-epicardial (endo:epi) perfusion ratio, and total ischemic burden (IB, defined as myocardial segments with MBF Results – Nineteen subjects were enrolled (100% female, 42% Black). Median age was 64 [56–72] years. Global stress MBF was 2.43 ml/min/g [2.16–2.78] and global myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) was 2.34 [2.07–2.88]. All had an abnormal subendocardial perfusion with an endo:epi of less than 1 (0.87 [0.81–0.90]). Regional myocardial hypoperfusion was detected in 14 (74%) patients with an IB of 6% [0-34.4]. Endo:epi ratio significantly correlated with IB (R=-0.510, p = 0.026) and measures of diastolic function (R = 0.531, p = 0.019 and R=-0.544, p = 0.014 for e’ and E/e’ respectively). Conclusion – Using a novel quantitative stress CMR myocardial perfusion mapping technique, women with obesity and HFpEF were found to have patterns of abnormal subendocardial perfusion which significantly correlated with measures of diastolic dysfunction.

Modulation of the inflammatory response is a promising therapeutic strategy in acute myocardial infarction. The novel approach is based on the anti-inflammatory and cytoprotective properties mediated by the engagement of the low-density lipoprotein‒related protein 1 (LRP1) receptor. SERPIN peptide 16 (SP16) is a synthetic, selective LRP1 agonist. We herein present the results of a study with a single subcutaneous administration of SP16 in 10 patients with STEMI, to appraise its safety and tolerability and explore the effects on the acute inflammatory response, infarct size, and cardiac function.Ten patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were enrolled within 12 hours of symptoms onset and 6 hours of percutaneous coronary intervention in a single-center, single-arm, open-label study of a single subcutaneous administration of SP16 (0.2 mg/kg). Serial clinical biomarkers and echocardiography data were collected up to 12 months. The data are presented separately for the treatment group and compared with historical controls from a placebo-treated arm in a recently completed clinical trial (N = 28) with similar enrollment criteria.All ten patients with STEMI received subcutaneous administration of SP16, 381 [272-478] minutes after percutaneous coronary intervention, without any treatment-related adverse events. The area under the curve for C-reactive protein was 133 [46-528] mg·d/L in the SP16-treated group versus 286 [141-581] mg·d/L in the historical placebo-treated group ( P = 0.161). The area under the curve for creatine kinase-myocardial band was 1432 [675-3089] ng·d/mL in the SP16-treated group versus 2367 [830-4750] ng·d/mL in the historical placebo-treated patients ( P = 0.428). Left ventricular ejection fraction was 46% [39-54] at baseline and 51% [46-58] at 1 year follow-up in SP16-treated patients (interval change 5% [-0.3% to +9%] P = 0.05) and 44% [38%-56%] at baseline and 53% [43%-59%] at 1 year follow-up in historical placebo-treated patients (interval change 3% [-5% to 10%], P = 0.305).A single subcutaneous administration of SP16, a synthetic targeted LRP1 agonist, was safe and well-tolerated in patients with STEMI. A trend toward reduction in the inflammatory response and infarct size with SP16 was noted; however, the sample size for this study was not based on formal statistical criteria. More extensive studies are planned to determine the clinical efficacy of SP16 in STEMI.NCT: NCT04225533.

ObjectivePolypharmacy management of recurrent pericarditis (RP) often involves long-term therapies, often with negative effects. Slow tapering of oral therapies is often required to avoid recurrence. A post hoc analysis of the phase III trial Rilonacept inHibition of interleukin-1 Alpha and beta for recurrent Pericarditis: a pivotal Symptomatology and Outcomes Study (RHAPSODY) evaluated investigator approaches to transitioning to IL-1 blockade monotherapy with rilonacept, which was hypothesised to allow accelerated withdrawal of common multidrug pericarditis regimens.MethodsRHAPSODY was a multicentre (Australia, Israel, Italy, USA), double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised-withdrawal trial in adults and adolescents with RP. Investigators initiated rilonacept at the labelled dose level and discontinued oral pericarditis therapies during the 12-week run-in; randomised patients received study drug as monotherapy. Time to rilonacept monotherapy was quantified in patients receiving multidrug regimens at baseline who achieved rilonacept monotherapy during run-in.ResultsIn 86 enrolled patients, mean time to rilonacept monotherapy was 7.9 weeks, with no recurrences. Of these, 64% (n=55) entered on multidrug regimens: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) plus colchicine (44% (24/55)), colchicine plus glucocorticoids (24% (13/55)), or NSAIDs, colchicine, plus glucocorticoids (33% (18/55)). Investigators transitioned patients receiving colchicine and glucocorticoids at baseline to rilonacept monotherapy without recurrence regardless of taper approach: sequential (n=14; median, 7.7 weeks) or concurrent (n=17; median, 8.0 weeks). Median time to rilonacept monotherapy was similar regardless of glucocorticoid dose and duration: ≤15 mg/day (n=21): 7.3 weeks; >15 mg/day (n=18): 8.0 weeks; long-term (≥28 days): 7.6 weeks.ConclusionsRapid discontinuation of oral RP therapies while transitioning to rilonacept monotherapy was feasible without triggering pericarditis recurrence.Trial registration numberNCT03737110.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This focused report aims to discuss and summarize the use of conventional and emerging methods using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in cardiomyopathy patients with implanted cardiac devices to identify diffuse and focal inflammation and fibrosis. RECENT FINDINGS: Many cardiomyopathy patients with diffuse and focal myocardial fibrosis have a unique need for cardiac imaging that is complicated by cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). CMR imaging can accurately image myocardial fibrosis and inflammation using T1 mapping and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging. CMR imaging in CIED patients, however, has been limited due to severe imaging artifacts associated with the devices. The emergence of wideband imaging variants of LGE and T1 mapping techniques can successfully reduce or eliminate CIED artifacts for the evaluation of myocardial substrate in cardiomyopathy patients. SUMMARY: Wideband imaging variants of LGE and T1 mapping techniques provide new tools for imaging focal and diffuse fibrosis and imaging in cardiomyopathy patients with implanted cardiac devices. These emerging techniques have the potential for great impact in clinical care of such patients as well as clinical research where imaging endpoints are desired.

Purpose of Review Ischemic cardiomyopathy refers to systolic left ventricular dysfunction in the setting of obstructive coronary artery disease and represents the most common cause of heart failure worldwide. It is often the combination of an irreversible loss of viable mass following an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with a dysfunctional, but still viable, myocardium in the context of a chronically reduced myocardial blood flow and reduced coronary reserve. Medical treatments aiming at modulating neurohumoral response and restoring blood flow to the ischemic cardiomyocytes were shown to dramatically abate the occurrence of ventricular dysfunction and adverse remodeling in ischemic cardiomyopathy. Recent Findings Novel therapeutic approaches, such as mechanical unloading and modulation of the inflammatory response, appear to be promising. Furthermore, the understanding of the mechanisms by which, despite optimal treatment, heart failure ensues after AMI, with or without adverse remodeling and systolic dysfunction, is a critical step in the search for novel ways to tackle heart failure risk beyond preservation of left ventricular volumes and systolic function. Summary In this review article, we explore the principal pathophysiological mechanisms and pathways of heart failure in ischemic cardiomyopathy, therapeutic opportunities, and knowledge gaps in this area.

Mortality related to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has gradually declined during the last decade. However, the causes and circumstances of death remain largely undescribed in contemporary practice.We retrospectively evaluated all patients undergoing PCI at our institution from July 2013 to March 2021. Three cardiologists independently determined the causes and circumstances of death, and evaluated the preventability of death using validated methods.During study period, 4334 patients underwent 5506 PCIs, of whom 166 patients suffered in-hospital death (3.0%). Ninety-three percent of deceased patients initially presented with acute coronary syndrome, and 45% with cardiogenic shock. Left ventricular failure was the most common cause of death (39.7%), followed by neurologic compromise after cardiac arrest (16.8%) and infections (13.8%). The circumstance of death was most commonly acute cardiac (51.8%), followed by non-cardiac (19.2%) and non-procedural complications (17.4%). Death was attributed to a procedural complication in only 12% of cases. Reviewers determined that 90% of cases as being unpreventable or slightly preventable. Inter-reviewer agreement was substantial (the three reviewers agreed in80% of cases for cause and preventability of death).Mortality after PCI is uncommon, largely unpreventable, and most often related to pre-existing, acute cardiovascular conditions. Procedural complications account for a minority of cases of death, and future effort should focus on the treatment of acute cardiovascular conditions, in particular cardiogenic shock, to decrease acute mortality after PCI.

Aspirin or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and colchicine are first-line treatments for acute and recurrent pericarditis. Drugs blocking the NACHT, leucine-rich repeat, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome/interleukin-1β (IL-1β) axis are beneficial in patients with multiple recurrences.In this review, the role of the NLRP3 inflammasome/IL-1β axis in the pathophysiology of pericarditis is discussed. Updates about novel therapies targeting IL-1 for recurrent pericarditis (RP) and practical considerations for their use are provided.IL-1 inhibitors have been increasingly studied for RP in recent years. NLRP3 inflammasome is a key mediator in the pathophysiology of RP. IL-1β, its main product, can sustain its own production and feeds local and systemic inflammation. Randomized clinical trials testing anakinra (a recombinant form of the IL-1 receptor antagonist blocking IL-1α and IL-1β) and rilonacept (an IL-1α and IL-1β trap) have shown that IL-1 blockade reduces recurrences. These trials also helped in phenotyping patients with RP. Patients with multiple recurrences and signs of pericardial and/or systemic inflammation might benefit from IL-1 blockers in order to interrupt cyclic flares of auto-inflammation. Given this evidence, guidelines should consider incorporating IL-1 blockers.

Aims In this protocol-predefined sub-study of the RHAPSODY trial, the primary aim was to assess whether pericardial late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was associated with time to pericarditis recurrence. Methods and Results RHAPSODY was a Phase 3 double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized-withdrawal trial which demonstrated the efficacy of rilonacept in recurrent pericarditis (RP). Patients with a history of multiple RP and an active recurrence were enrolled and had the option to participate in a cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging sub-study. CMRs were interpreted by a blinded independent core laboratory with pre-specified criteria to define pericardial LGE. Compared to patients with trace or mild pericardial LGE (n=9), patients with moderate or severe pericardial LGE (n=16) generally had a higher number of recurrent episodes per year (5.3 vs. 3.9) and a higher mean CRP level (3.6 vs 1.1 mg/dL). Overall, 10/14 (71.4%) who received placebo had a recurrence compared to 0/11 (0%) who received rilonacept. In patients randomized to placebo who had moderate or severe pericardial LGE, the median time to recurrence was 4.2 weeks compared to 10.7 weeks in patients who had trace or mild pericardial LGE. At the conclusion of the event-driven randomized withdrawal period, among patients receiving placebo, 5/7 (71.4%) with trace or mild pericardial LGE and 5/7 (71.4%) with moderate or severe pericardial LGE had a recurrence. Conclusions Among patients with multiple RP, these preliminary findings support the concept of pericardial LGE as an imaging biomarker that may inform duration of treatment and risk of recurrence with cessation of therapy, and larger studies should be considered. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03737110

Large traditional clinical trials suggest that sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors improve symptoms in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). In the midst of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic, we sought to confirm these benefits in a new type of trial that was patient centered and conducted in a completely remote fashion. In the CHIEF-HF trial (NCT04252287), 476 participants with HF, regardless of EF or diabetes status, were randomized to 100 mg of canagliflozin or placebo. Enrollment was stopped early due to shifting sponsor priorities, without unblinding. The primary outcome was change in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Total Symptom Score (KCCQ TSS) at 12 weeks. The 12-week change in KCCQ TSS was 4.3 points (95% confidence interval, 0.8–7.8; P = 0.016) higher with canagliflozin than with placebo, meeting the primary endpoint. Similar effects were observed in participants with HFpEF and in those with HFrEF and in participants with and without diabetes, demonstrating that canagliflozin significantly improves symptom burden in HF, regardless of EF or diabetes status. This randomized, double-blind trial, conducted without in-person interactions between doctor and patient, can serve as a model for future all-virtual clinical trials.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is capable of inducing the activation of NACHT, leucine-rich repeat, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome, a macromolecular structure sensing the danger and amplifying the inflammatory response. The main product processed by NLRP3 inflammasome is interleukin (IL)-1β, responsible for the downstream production of IL-6, which has been recognized as an important mediator in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Since colchicine is an anti-inflammatory drug with the ability to block NLRP3 inflammasome oligomerization, this may prevent the release of active IL-1β and block the detrimental effects of downstream cytokines, i.e. IL-6. To date, few randomized clinical trials and many observational studies with colchicine have been conducted, showing interesting signals. As colchicine is a nonspecific inhibitor of the NLRP3 inflammasome, compounds specifically blocking this molecule might provide increased advantages in reducing the inflammatory burden and its related clinical manifestations. This may occur through a selective blockade of different steps preceding NLRP3 inflammasome oligomerization as well as through a reduced release of the main cytokines (IL-1β and IL-18). Since most evidence is based on observational studies, definitive conclusion cannot be drawn and additional studies are needed to confirm preliminary results and further dissect how colchicine and other NLRP3 inhibitors reduce the inflammatory burden and evaluate the timing and duration of treatment. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00011-022-01540-y.

Acute pericarditis is an inflammatory disease associated with a non-negligible risk of acute complications and future recurrence. However, the exact incidence of pericarditis recurrence in patients with a first uncomplicated clinical course is unknown. We sought to evaluate the incidence and clinical predictors of recurrence after a first episode of acute uncomplicated pericarditis in a large urban hospital in the United States. We conducted a retrospective review, through electronic health records, to complete a database that includes patients admitted with a first episode of acute pericarditis and selected only those with an uncomplicated course (without in-hospital death, large pericardial effusion [>20 mm] or tamponade, constriction, or incessant pericarditis) at the VCU Medical Center (Richmond, Virginia) from 2009 to 2018. A total of 240 patients met acute pericarditis criteria: of the 240 patients, 164 patients (68%) had an uncomplicated course (median age [interquartile range] in years: 50 [32 to 62], 43% females). The median follow-up time was 186 (19 to 467) days. Pericarditis was idiopathic in 84 patients (51%). Fifteen patients (9%) had at least 1 episode of recurrent pericarditis. Compared with those without recurrence, patients with recurrent pericarditis were younger (37 [25 to 59] vs 51 [34 to 62] years, p = 0.034), had a higher prevalence of subacute/delayed presentation (2 [13%] vs 1 [1%], p = 0.023), and less frequently received colchicine (6 [40%] vs 100 [67%], p = 0.036). At multivariate logistic regression analysis, subacute presentation and younger age remained predictors of recurrence at follow-up. In conclusion, 9% of patients with acute pericarditis experienced a recurrence over a 6-month median follow-up despite an initial uncomplicated course. Younger age and subacute presentation were associated with a significantly increased risk of recurrence.

The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has placed tremendous strain on health systems throughout the world. This has led to many clinical trials being launched in order to try to find ways to combat the disease. The unprecedented nature of the pandemic has been reflected in the methods used in some of these trials. Placebo-controlled randomized trials are considered the gold-standard, however, there are inherent challenges in the use of placebo, especially during COVID-19. We herein review the pros, cons, challenges and limitations of using placebo in clinical trials investigating treatments for COVID-19. We also discuss the importance of viewing research critically, examining the potential impact of placebo use or lack thereof, on blinding and possible biases. This becomes important as we assess the responses to the pandemic in preparation for a future pandemic. Although placebo-controlled clinical trials are the gold standard for clinical research, they may not be practically or ethically feasible during a pandemic. Choices accomplished to design many COVID-19 trials might reflect the unprecedently trying environment in which they were made. However, critical evaluation of the methodology and practice of scientific research remains a crucial part of the scientific process. Even when conducted as randomized double-blinded studies, residual biases may exist and interfere with the study conduct and interpretation of the data. A critical review of all data, remains essential to thoroughly assess the impact of a research study.