Search

Combinations of GluR5-GluR7, KA1, and KA2 subunits form kainate receptors, a subtype of excitatory ionotropic glutamate receptors. Isoflurane enhances the action of kainate receptors comprising GluR6 subunits expressed in oocytes. To test whether alterations of the GluR6 subunit gene affect the actions of inhaled anesthetics in vivo, we measured the minimum alveolar concentration of desflurane, isoflurane, and halothane in mice lacking the kainate receptor subunit GluR6 (GluR6 knockout mice) and mice with a dominant negative glutamine/arginine (Q/R) editing mutation in membrane domain 2 of the GluR6 receptor (GluR6 editing mutants), which increases the calcium permeability of kainate receptors containing GluR6Q. We also measured the capacity of isoflurane to interfere with Pavlovian fear conditioning to a tone and to context. Absence of the GluR6 subunit did not change the minimum alveolar concentration of isoflurane, desflurane, or halothane. Possibly, kainate receptors assembled from the remaining kainate receptor subunits compensate for the absent subunits and thereby produce a normal minimum alveolar concentration. A Q/R mutation that dominantly affects kainate receptors containing the GluR6 subunit in mice increased isoflurane minimum alveolar concentration (by 12%; P < 0.01), decreased desflurane minimum alveolar concentration (by 18%; P < 0.001), and did not change halothane minimum alveolar concentration (P = 0.25). These data may indicate that kainate receptors containing GluR6Q subunits differently modulate, directly or indirectly, the mechanism by which inhaled anesthetics cause immobility. The mutations of GluR6 that were studied did not affect the capacity of isoflurane to interfere with fear conditioning.

Background Production of retrograde amnesia by anesthetics would indicate that these drugs can disrupt mechanisms that stabilize memory. Such disruption would allow suppression of memory of previous untoward events. The authors examined whether isoflurane provides retrograde amnesia for classic (Pavlovian) fear conditioning. Methods Rats were trained to fear tone by applying three (three-trial) or one (one-trial) tone-shock pairs while breathing various constant concentrations of isoflurane. Immediately after training, isoflurane administration was either discontinued, maintained unchanged, or rapidly increased to 1.0 minimum alveolar concentration for 1 h longer. Groups of rats were similarly trained to fear context while breathing isoflurane by applying shocks (without tones) in a distinctive environment. The next day, memory for the conditioned stimuli was determined by presenting the tone or context (without shock) and measuring the proportion of time each rat froze (appeared immobile). For each conditioning procedure, the effects of the three posttraining isoflurane treatments were compared. Results Rapid increases in posttraining isoflurane administration did not suppress conditioned fear for any of the training procedures. In contrast, isoflurane administration during conditioning dose-dependently suppressed conditioning (P < 0.05). Training to tone was more resistant to the effects of isoflurane than training to context (P < 0.05), and the three-trial learning procedure was more was more resistant than the one-trial procedure (P < 0.05). Conclusions Isoflurane provided intense dose-dependent anterograde but not retrograde amnesia for classic fear conditioning. Isoflurane appears to disrupt memory processes that occur at or within a few minutes of the conditioning procedure.

Inhaled and other anesthetics profoundly affect the central nervous system, causing amnesia, immobility in the face of noxious stimulation, and depression of thermoregulation. Nonimmobilizers, inhaled compounds whose lipophilicity suggests that they should be anesthetics, do not produce immobility, but they do cause amnesia. Their effects on thermoregulation were the subject of the present study. We gave eight rats isoflurane on one occasion and the nonimmobilizer 2N (1,2-dichlorolhexafluorocyclobutane) on another. We measured the effect of various concentrations of each compound on thermoregulation provoked by body cooling. The specific outcome was increased metabolism, as reflected in increased output of carbon dioxide. Isoflurane decreased the temperature threshold for such increases and the maximum response intensity, doing so in a concentration-dependent manner, whereas 2N had a minimal or no effect at any concentration up to 0.9 minimum alveolar concentration (estimated from its lipophilicity). Thus, 2N may be a useful tool for studies of the mechanisms mediating the thermoregulatory depression produced by anesthetics: 2N should not affect such a mechanism. Unlike inhaled anesthetics, the nonimmobilizer 2N (1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane) minimally affects temperature regulation in rats. Thus, 2N may be useful in mechanistic studies of temperature regulation. Cellular and molecular sites that mediate the capacity of inhaled anesthetics to depress thermoregulation should be influenced by anesthetics but not by 2N.

Previous reports suggest that the administration of epinephrine increases learning during deep barbiturate-chloral hydrate anesthesia in rats but not during anesthesia with 0.4% isoflurane in rabbits. We revisited this issue, using fear conditioning to a tone in rats as our experimental model for learning and memory and isoflurane and desflurane as our anesthetics. Expressed as a fraction of the minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) preventing movement in 50% of rats, the amnestic 50% effective dose (ED(50)) for fear to tone in control rats inhaling isoflurane and injected with saline intraperitoneally (i.p.) was 0.32 +/- 0.03 MAC (mean +/- se) compared with 0.37 +/- 0.06 MAC in rats injected with 0.01 mg/kg of epinephrine i.p. and 0.38 +/- 0.03 MAC in rats injected with 0.1 mg/kg of epinephrine i.p. For desflurane, the amnestic ED(50) were 0.32 +/- 0.05 MAC in control rats receiving a saline injection i.p. versus 0.36 +/- 0.04 MAC in rats injected with 0.1 mg/kg of epinephrine i.p. We conclude that exogenous epinephrine does not decrease amnesia produced by inhaled isoflurane or desflurane, as assessed by fear conditioning to a tone in rats.

UNLABELLED The nonimmobilizer 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane (2N, also termed F6) does not suppress movement to noxious stimuli but does suppress learning of fear-potentiated startle. The mechanism whereby 2N suppresses this learning is unknown. Herein, we report the effect of 2N on suppression of two other forms of learning, fear conditioning to context and to tone. Because 2N does not cause sedation, we could study the effect of 2N on short-term memory (memory for fear conditioning measured during or immediately after training) as well as on long-term memory (measured 24 h after training). The EC(50) for suppression of long-term memory (the concentration decreasing memory by 50%) of fear conditioning to context was 2.00% plus/minus 0.01% (mean plus/minus SEM), and for fear conditioning to tone was 3.45% plus/minus 0.26%, (P < 0.05). The EC(50) for suppression of short-term memory of fear conditioning to context was 2.59% plus/minus 0.21% (P < 0.05, compared with long-term memory of context conditioning), whereas short-term memory of fear conditioning to tone was not suppressed by 3.5%, the largest concentration studied. Thus, short-term memory resists the depressant effect of 2N more than long-term memory, fear conditioning to tone is less vulnerable to the effect of 2N than fear conditioning to context, and 3.5% 2N does not preclude transmission of tone and shock signals to the site where tone-shock associations are formed. IMPLICATIONS The nonimmobilizer 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane has a greater depressant effect on long-term memory than short-term memory, suggesting that it impairs the processes responsible for the retention of memory more than for the formation of memory itself.