Search

A man in his mid-30s was admitted with a thunderclap headache. He was conscious and hypertensive. A decade earlier, severe hypertension had been diagnosed and extensively investigated without revealing an underlying cause. Brain imaging showed subarachnoid haemorrhage caused by a ruptured pericallosal aneurysm. Endovascular occlusion was attempted, but as the sheath could not pass the aortic arch, it was converted to surgical aneurismal clipping. Intraoperative blood pressure measurement revealed a peak-to-peak gradient of 100 mm Hg across the aortic arch and an ankle/brachial index of 0.46 (normal range 0.9–1.2). Aortic coarctation was suspected, and angiographic imaging and echocardiography confirmed the diagnosis. Subacute direct stenting was performed, which normalised the peak-to-peak gradient and ankle/brachial index. To minimise the risk of severe complications, early diagnosis of aortic coarctation is important and can be facilitated by ankle/brachial index and echocardiography in the suprasternal view.

Background: to investigate the frequency and distribution of new ischemic brain lesions detected by diffusion-weighted imaging on brain magnetic resonance imaging after aortic arch surgery. Methods: This preplanned secondary analysis of the randomized, controlled ACE (Aortic Surgery Cerebral Protection Evaluation) CardioLink-3 trial compared the safety and efficacy of innominate versus axillary artery cannulation during elective proximal aortic arch surgery. Participants underwent pre and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging. New ischemic lesions were defined as lesions visible on postoperative, but not preoperative diffusion weighted imaging. Results: Of the 111 trial participants, 102 had complete magnetic resonance imaging data. A total of 391 new ischemic lesions were observed on diffusion-weighted imaging in 71 (70%) patients. The average number of lesions in patients with ischemic lesion were 5.5±4.9 with comparable numbers in the right (2.9±2.0) and left (3.0±2.3) hemispheres ( P =0.49). Half the new lesions were in the middle cerebral artery territory; 63% of the cohort had ischemic lesions in the anterior circulation, 49% in the posterior circulation, 42% in both, and 20% in watershed areas. A probability mask of all diffusion-weighted imaging lesions revealed that the cerebellum was commonly involved. More severe white matter hyperintensity on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (odds ratio, 1.80 [95% CI, 1.10–2.95]; P =0.02) and lower nadir nasopharyngeal temperature during surgery (odds ratio per 1°C decrease, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.00–1.32]; P =0.05) were associated with the presentation of new ischemic lesion; older age (risk ratio per 1-year increase, 1.02 [95% CI, 1.00–1.04]; P =0.03) and lower nadir temperature (risk ratio per 1°C decrease, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.00–1.14]; P =0.06) were associated with greater number of lesions. Conclusions: In patients who underwent elective proximal aortic arch surgery, new ischemic brain lesions were common, and predominantly involved the middle cerebral artery territory or cerebellum. Underlying small vessel disease, lower temperature nadir during surgery, and advanced age were risk factors for perioperative ischemic lesions. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02554032.

Total endovascular aortic arch repair (TEAAR) represents an emerging alternative for the treatment of aortic arch disease in patients at prohibitive risk for open surgery. A systematic review of TEAAR was performed to delineate early outcomes with this new technology.All studies (excluding single-patient case reports) of CE-certified "custom made" or "off-the-shelf" zone 0 stent graft deployments were included. The primary search of Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and the Cochrane CENTRAL registry was supplemented with searches of Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and conference abstracts (within last 3 years), and a hand search of citations within relevant articles. Articles underwent 2-stage screening by 2 independent reviewers before inclusion.Fifteen relevant investigations were identified. Indications for TEAAR were chronic arch dissection with degenerative aneurysmal disease (54%, 148/273), pure arch aneurysm (41%, 112/273), penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (2%, 5/273), and type IA endoleak from a zone 2 thoracic endograft (1%, 3/273). Double-branch (70%, 192/273), triple-branch (19%, 53/273), and single-branch (into innominate artery; 10%, 28/273) devices were used. Adjunct left carotid-subclavian bypass occurred in 90% of double- and single-branch procedures. Procedural success with TEAAR was 93% (95% CI 85.8%-96.3%). The proportion of all-cause mortality was 16% (95% CI 8%-26%), stroke 14% (8%-24%), peripheral vascular events 7% (1%-33%), and myocardial infarction 4% (2%-7%). Endoleaks were identified in 13% (7%-25%) of the study population.TEAAR represents an emerging option for the management of aortic arch disease wth high procedural success rates and acceptable early outcomes in a high-risk patient population.

Female sex has been associated with decreased mortality after blunt trauma, but whether sex influences the outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for traumatic blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) is unknown.In this retrospective study of a prospectively maintained database, the Vascular Quality Initiative registry was queried from 2013 to 2020 for patients undergoing TEVAR for BTAI. Univariate Student's t-tests and χOf 806 eligible patients, 211 (26.2%) were female. Female patients were older (47.9 vs 41.8 years, P .0001) and less likely to smoke (38.3% vs 48.2%, P = .044). Most patients presented with grade III BTAI (54.5% female, 53.6% male), followed by grade IV (19.0% female, 19.5% male). Mean Injury Severity Scores (30.9 + 20.3 female, 30.5 + 18.8 male) and regional Abbreviated Injury Score did not vary by sex. Postoperatively, female patients were less likely to die as inpatients (3.8% vs 7.9%, P = .042) and to be discharged home (41.4% vs 52.2%, P = .008). On multivariate logistic regression, female sex (odds ratio [OR]: 0.05, P = .002) was associated with reduced inpatient mortality. Advanced age (OR: 1.06, P .001), postoperative transfusion (OR: 1.05, P = .043), increased Injury Severity Score (OR: 1.03, P = .039), postoperative stroke (OR: 9.09, P = .016), postoperative myocardial infarction (OR: 9.9, P = .017), and left subclavian coverage (OR: 2.7, P = .029) were associated with inpatient death.Female sex is associated with lower odds of inpatient mortality after TEVAR for BTAI, independent of age, injury severity, BTAI grade, and postoperative complications. Further study of the influence of sex on postdischarge outcomes is needed.

Truncus arteriosus with interrupted aortic arch (TA-IAA) is a rare congenital heart defect with historically poor outcomes. Contemporary multicenter data are limited.A retrospective cohort study of children who underwent repair of TA-IAA between 2009 and 2016 at 12 tertiary care referral centers within the United States was performed. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were defined as postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, or operative mortality. TA-IAA patients were compared with TA patients who underwent repair during the study period from the same institutions.We reviewed 35 patients with TA-IAA. MACE occurred in 12 patients (34%). Improvement over time was observed during the study period with 11 events (92%) occurring in the first half of the study period (P = .03). Factors associated with MACE included moderate or severe truncal valve insufficiency (P.01), concomitant truncal valve repair (P = .04), and longer cardiopulmonary bypass duration (P = .02). In comparison with 216 patients who underwent TA repair, patients with TA-IAA had a higher rate of MACE, but this finding was not statistically significant (34% vs 20%, respectively; P = .07). Additionally no differences between TA-IAA and TA groups were observed for unplanned reoperations (14% vs 22%, respectively; P = .3), hospital length of stay (24 vs 23 days, P = .65), or late deaths (7% vs 7%, P = 1.00).In this contemporary, multicenter cohort the rate of MACE after repair of TA-IAA was high but improved during the study period. Early childhood outcomes of patients with TA-IAA were similar to those with TA.

Background and Introduction Interrupted aortic arch (IAA) is a very rare congenital anomaly carrying high neonatal mortality rate if left untreated. Rarer still, is its presentation in teenage or adulthood. This condition has been found to be complicated with cerebral aneurysms, which is a consequence of hemodynamic stress and hypertension secondary to arch interruption. Cerebral aneurysms can further complicate the clinical course and lead to poor clinical outcomes, especially if ruptured. Clinical Presentation A 17-year-old female presented with ruptured basilar top aneurysm and was considered for endovascular coiling. Transfemoral access was chosen but the catheter could not be negotiated beyond proximal thoracic aorta. A computed tomographic angiography (CTA) of thorax and abdomen was performed, which showed isolated interruption of aortic arch. Subsequently, transradial route was used for coiling of the aneurysm. Conclusion To the best of our knowledge, the index case is one of the only seven cases of IAA with cerebral aneurysm that have been reported till date in medical literature. It also holds the unique distinction of being the first case of IAA with cerebral aneurysm treated by endovascular approach. Our case highlights the importance of transradial access in such pathological conditions.

Prenatal detection of coarctation of the aorta (CoA) still suffers from high false-positive and false-negative rates. The objective of this study was to develop a novel model to improve the diagnostic accuracy of fetal CoA.A retrospective study was conducted in 122 fetuses with suspected CoA who also had postnatal follow-up. Fetuses with confirmed diagnoses of CoA after birth were defined as the CoA group, and the non-CoA group comprised those with false positives. Conventional fetal echocardiographic measurements, including great arterial dimensions and flow characteristics, were obtained. Left ventricular (LV) functional parameters were determined using two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography. A novel multiparametric diagnostic model, including gestational age at diagnosis, aortic isthmus (AOI) Z score, and LV longitudinal strain (LVLS), was developed in univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. The model was validated prospectively by a validation cohort of 48 fetuses.CoA was confirmed in 62 of 122 patients (50.8%) after birth. Fetuses with postnatal CoA were diagnosed significantly earlier than those with false-positives (median, 24.5 weeks [interquartile range, 23.3-26.4 weeks] vs 27.8 weeks [interquartile range, 24.5-30.4 weeks]; P .001). The Z scores of aortic dimensions (aortic valve annulus, ascending aorta, transverse aortic arch, and AOI) were significantly smaller (P .001 for all), whereas the Z scores of pulmonary dimensions (pulmonary valve annulus and main pulmonary artery) were significantly greater (P .05 for all), in cases of confirmed CoA than false positives. Compared with the non-CoA group, the CoA group displayed lower LV ejection fraction (P = .005), LV fractional area change (P .001), and LVLS (P .001). A multivariate logistic regression model incorporating gestational age (odds ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.60-0.88; P = .001), AOI Z score (odds ratio, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.08-0.41; P .001), and LVLS (odds ratio, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.41-2.42; P .001) was shown to diagnose CoA more accurately (Akaike information criterion = 81.77, C statistic = 0.945). The performance of this model was confirmed prospectively in the validation cohort.In fetuses with suspected CoA, speckle-tracking analysis of LVLS may have incremental value in predicting postnatal CoA. The diagnostic model presented here, including gestational age, AOI Z score and LVLS, may provide a good tool for stratification of risk in fetal CoA and contribute to patient-specific perinatal management.

Today's vascular surgeon must navigate their practice through a field of ever-advancing technology while maintaining knowledge of open techniques that remain equally important in the care of their patients. In this article, the authors provide insight into the perioperative decision-making that goes into choosing a surgical plan for each patient based on their disease process, anatomy, nonmodifiable risk factors, and other comorbidities.

No guidelines for the treatment of Kommerell diverticulum (KD) have been established. Endovascular treatment with arch vessel reconstruction of 4 patients with a right-sided aortic arch and aberrant left subclavian artery are presented herein. A 39-year-old woman and 47-year-old man experienced dyspnea and retrosternal pain. The first patient concomitantly underwent left subclavian transposition and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). The second patient underwent bilateral carotid-subclavian bypass grafting, followed by TEVAR and KD embolization. The 2 other patients were 72- and 75-year old men who presented with KD and type B dissection, in which these conditions were characterized by acute thoracic pain in the former patient and were noted on incidental body scan for prostatic adenocarcinoma in the latter. The third patient underwent carotid-subclavian bypass grafting, followed by TEVAR and subclavian plugs, and in the fourth patient, regular follow-up with antihypertensive therapy was scheduled. After a mean follow-up period of 12 months, all patients were alive.

Various surgical options have been described for the treatment of aberrant subclavian arteries and an associated Kommerell diverticulum.Between 1999 and 2019, 43 patients underwent a repair, comprising 26 (61%) endovascular and 17 (39%) open approaches. The endovascular approach consisted of initial subclavian revascularization followed by thoracic endovascular aortic repair. The open approach included total arch replacement (12%) and reverse hemiarch repair with left thoracotomy (53%) or right thoracotomy (35%). The perioperative and long-term outcomes were retrospectively reviewed.No mortality occurred in the endovascular group, whereas there was 1 (6%) in the open approach group. Patients in the endovascular group demonstrated a shorter hospital stay (3.5 days vs 10.0 days; P = .001) and less frequent prolonged mechanical ventilation (0% vs 24%; P = .019), with a lower occurrence of pneumonia (0% vs 24%; P = .019). Among patients who had the endovascular approach, shrinkage of Kommerell diverticulum or aberrant vessel origin was seen in 96%. Furthermore, relief of dysphagia was confirmed in 92% (12/13), including patients without Kommerell diverticulum (n = 3) after endovascular repair. The cumulative incidence of treatment failure or aortic reintervention at 7 years was 21% and 14 % in the endovascular and open approach groups, respectively (P = .62). Two (8%) patients in the endovascular group required an open reintervention. One reintervention was performed for persistent dysphagia in the setting of an untreated complete vascular ring, and the other was for persistent false lumen flow associated with aortic dissection.The treatment approach should be individualized on the basis of the aortic disease and comorbidities. The endovascular approach is a viable and effective alternative in the presence of suitable landing zones.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term outcomes of a conservative approach (with proximal aortic replacement with or without hemiarch replacement) versus an aggressive approach (with total aortic arch replacement) in the treatment of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD).METHODS: We performed a pooled analysis of Kaplan-Meier-derived individual patient data from studies with follow-up comparing the aforementioned approaches to treat patients with ATAAD.RESULTS: Eighteen studies met our eligibility criteria, comprising 5243 patients with follow-up (Conservative: 3676 patients; Aggressive: 1567 patients). We observed a statistically significant difference in overall survival favoring the aggressive approach (hazard ratios [HR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-0.98, p = .022), but no statistically significant difference in the risk of reoperation (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.66-1.2, p = .439) in the overall follow-up. Landmark analyses revealed that, in the first 3 months after the procedure, mortality rates were comparable between conservative and aggressive approaches (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.88-1.24, p = .627), but the results beyond 3 months showed improved survival in patients undergoing the aggressive surgical procedure (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.59-0.85, p CONCLUSION: The aggressive approach seems to confer better long-term survival and lower risk of the need for reoperation in the follow-up of patients treated for ATAAD.

The aim of this study was to investigate whether distal aortic maximum false lumen area (MFLA) ratio predicts late aortic dilation and reintervention after open repair of acute type I aortic dissection.We analyzed 309 nonsyndromic acute type I aortic dissection patients who were treated with a repair to the proximal aorta between 1994 and 2017. In 230 patients who did not show completely thrombosed false lumen on postoperative computed tomography, the MFLA ratio (MFLA/aortic area) on the descending thoracic aorta (DTA) was measured with postoperative computed tomography. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the quartile range of MFLA ratio: low MFLA,0.62 (n = 57); intermediate MFLA, 0.62 to 0.81 (n = 116); and high MFLA, ≥0.82 (n = 57).The aortic expansion rate was significantly higher in the high MFLA group (11.1 ± 21.2 mm/y) compared with intermediate (3.0 ± 7.4 mm/y; P.01) and low (0.6 ± 6.6 mm/y; P.01) MFLA groups. High MFLA was found to be an independent risk factor for significant aortic expansion (adjusted hazard ratio, 5.26; 95% CI, 1.53-18.12; P.01) and aorta-related reintervention (hazard ratio, 4.99; 95% CI, 2.23-11.13; P.01), and the MFLA ratio was significantly related to proximal DTA reentry tears (adjusted odds ratio, 12974.3; P.001; area under curve, 0.807).A high MFLA ratio on the DTA after acute type I aortic dissection repair is associated with increased risk of late aortic reintervention and distal aortic dilation. A high MFLA ratio is strongly associated with proximal DTA reentry tears.

Background: No previous study has shown that the volume of calcium score is useful for evaluating the aorta when performing a partial clamp (PC). The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of different clamping strategies during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB), in terms of the incidence of postoperative stroke using the calcium score of the ascending aorta. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 339 patients, who underwent isolated OPCAB between August 2013 and March 2021. There were two groups of patients, depending on the procedure. A PC was used for proximal anastomoses in 130 (38.3%) patients. A clampless proximal facilitating anastomotic device (CFD) was used in 107 (31.5%) patients. We prescribed preoperative CT for all patients, and the Agatston score was used. Results: The calcium score significantly was higher in the CFD group than in the PC group (29.7 ± 66.5 vs. 1819.8 ± 2391.5, < 0.001). The number of distal anastomoses and operative time were not significantly different between the two groups. There was no mortality and three strokes occurred at the 30-day follow up. Two strokes occurred in the PC group (1.5%) and one in the CFD group (0.9%), which was not significantly different (P = 0.98). Conclusion: A PC does not increase postoperative stroke incidence compared with a CFD, when utilizing calcium score evaluation in OPCAB.

The effect of the surgical sealant AQUABRID on outcomes after acute aortic dissection repair has not been evaluated. The objective of this study was to examine whether the use of AQUABRID affects the volume of intraoperative blood transfusion or operative time in patients undergoing emergency surgery to repair acute aortic dissection.A multicenter retrospective cohort study from January 2007 to December 2021. A total of 399 patients underwent emergency acute aortic dissection repair. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for the type of surgery and other patient characteristics.A total of 387 of the eligible 399 patients were included in this study and propensity score matching yielded 94 patients for whom characteristics were not significantly different between the two groups. The type of surgery was exactly matched (ascending aorta replacement: 19 [40%]; partial arch replacement: 13 [28%]; total arch replacement: 15 [32%] in each group). Within the matched cohort, there was a statistically significant difference in the volume of intraoperative blood transfusion. (AQUABRID vs. control: 34 [26-38] vs. 50 [38-60] U in Japan, p = .03). Operating time was significantly shorter in the AQUABRID group (total operation: mean ± SD, 343 ± 92 vs. 402 ± 161 min, p = .03; reconstruction for arch vessels: 29 ± 17 vs. 56 ± 22, p .01). The rate of postoperative complications was comparable in the two groups. Failure to use AQUABRID was a significant predictor of the need for massive transfusion (40 U) (odds ratio: 7.20; 95% confidence interval: 2.56-20.23; p .01).The use of AQUABRID during emergency acute aortic dissection repair significantly decreased the volume of intraoperative blood transfusion and the duration of surgery.

Objectives: New temperature management concepts of moderate and mild hypothermic circulatory arrest during aortic arch surgery have gained weight over profound cooling. Comparisons of all temperature levels have rarely been performed. We performed direct and indirect comparisons of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) (≤20°C), moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest (MHCA) (20.1–25°C), and mild hypothermic circulatory arrest (mild HCA) (≥25.1°C) in a network meta-analysis. Methods: The literature was systematically searched for all papers published through February 2022 reporting on clinical outcomes after aortic arch surgery utilizing DHCA, MHCA and mild HCA. The primary outcome was operative mortality. The secondary outcomes were postoperative stroke and acute kidney failure (AKI). Results: A total of 34 studies were included, with a total of 12,370 patients. DHCA was associated with significantly higher postoperative incidence of stroke when compared with MHCA (odds ratio [OR], 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19–1.78) and mild HCA: (OR, 1.50, 95% CI, 1.14–1.98). Furthermore, DHCA and MHCA were associated with higher operative mortality when compared with mild HCA (OR 1.71, 95% CI, 1.23–2.39 and OR 1.50, 95% CI, 1.12–2.00, respectively). Separate analysis of randomized and propensity score matched studies showed sustained increased risk of stroke with DHCA in contrast to MHCA and mild HCA (OR, 1.61, 95% CI, 1.18–2.20, p value =.0029 and OR, 1.74, 95% CI, 1.09–2.77, p value =.019). Conclusions: In the included studies, the moderate to mild hypothermia strategies were associated with decreased operative mortality and the risk of postoperative stroke. Large-scale prospective studies are warranted to further explore appropriate temperature management for the treatment of aortic arch pathologies.

Optimal hypothermia strategy for total arch replacement in acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is unclear. A higher temperature during circulatory arrest might reduce tolerance to ischemia for visceral organs. We sought to investigate the effect of hypothermia on visceral protection.From January 2010 to December 2019, 1138 consecutive patients underwent total arch replacement combined with frozen elephant trunk for acute type A aortic dissection. The data were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Visceral organ injury and visceral-related adverse outcomes were defined as acute renal failure or spinal cord injury or both. Multivariate logistic regression analysis and multivariate linear regression model were used.The mean age of patient was 46.9 ± 10.0 years, with a male preponderance (79.6%). Operative mortality was 6.1% (69 patients). Spinal cord injury occurred in 55 (4.8%) patients and 133 (11.7%) patients had acute renal failure. In the multivariate logistic regression model, neither bladder temperature (odds ratio [OR] 0.971, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.922-1.024, p = .278) nor circulatory arrest duration (OR 1.017, 95% CI 0.987-1.047, p = .267) significantly associated with visceral-related adverse outcomes. Female, lower limb malperfusion, age, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) duration and preoperative serum creatinine level were independent risk factors of visceral-related outcomes. There was a significant negative correlation between bladder temperature and CPB duration in multiple linear regression model (β = -3.67, p .0001).Bladder temperature had no effect on outcomes related to visceral protection under the premise of short circulatory arrest duration, but female gender, lower limb malperfusion, age, CPB duration, and preoperative serum creatinine level were independent risk factors. Bladder temperature negatively correlated to CPB duration.

To compare perioperative and midterm outcomes in thoracic and thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm (TAA and TAAA) repair using hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA) or aortic clamping (AC) with mild hypothermia.From 2012 to 2021 there were 180 open repairs of a TAA or TAAA, of which 90 (50%) were done with HCA and 90 (50%) with aortic clamping with mild hypothermia. The indications for HCA were arch aneurysm, TAA from chronic aortic dissection, and inability to clamp the aorta for proximal anastomosis.Compared to AC, the HCA group had less prior descending aorta replacement/repair (9.1% vs. 32%, p = 0.0001). Intraoperatively, the HCA group had more TAAs (70% vs. 20%, p 0.0001) while the AC group had more TAAAs (80% vs. 30%, p 0.0001). HCA group had longer cardiopulmonary bypass times (242 vs. 181 min, p 0.0001) but shorter cross-clamp time (39 vs. 120 min, p 0.0001) and lower temperatures (18°C vs. 34°C, p 0.0001). Postoperatively, the HCA group had longer intubation times (31 vs. 26 h, p = 0.002), but all other postoperative outcomes including paralysis (2.2% vs. 8.9%, p = 0.08), and operative mortality (4.4% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.68) were similar between HCA and AC groups. Patient age was an independent risk factor for postoperative paralysis (OR 1.07, p = 0.03) while HCA was not significant (OR 0.37, p = 0.21). Five-year survival was similar between HCA and AC groups (85% vs. 80%, p = 0.36).Postoperative outcomes and midterm survival were acceptable in thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysm patients after HCA or AC. Both HCA and AC with mild hypothermia were valid approaches in TAA/A repair.

Thoracic endovascular repair has become the standard treatment for blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI). Occlusion of the left subclavian artery (LSA) is generally required for an adequate landing zone (ALZ). We propose that coverage of the LSA is not necessary for BTAI even with a short landing zone (SLZ).Retrospective review of BTAI patients, who were treated from January 2008 to December 2020, was analyzed. BTAI was categorized into 2 cohorts, SLZ20 mm and ALZ20 mm. Demographic data, trauma scores, grade of BTAI, procedure-related data, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. t-Test and chi-squared tests were used for statistical analysis.Thoracic endovascular repair was performed in 59 BTAI patients (mean age of 38.9 ± 14 years, mean Injury Severity Score of 40.4 ± 9.3). Two cohorts were identified: 49 patients had an SLZ, and 10 patients had an ALZ (14 ± 3.1 mm vs. 25 ± 4.1 mm, P = 0.03). The procedures were performed successfully with 59 patients (86.4%) deploying in zone 3. In-hospital mortality (SLZ group: 4.1% vs. ALZ group: 0, P = 0.318), endoleak (SLZ group: 4.1% vs. ALZ group: 20%, P = 0.45), stroke (SLZ group: 0 vs. ALZ group: 0, P = 1), spinal cord ischemia (SLZ group: 2% vs. ALZ group: 0, P = 1), left arm ischemia (SLZ group: 0 vs. ALZ group: 0, P =1), and reintervention rate (SLZ group: 0 vs. ALZ group: 0, P = 1) were not statistically different between cohorts.BTAI repair with an SLZ can be treated successfully without covering the LSA, analyzing technical success and in-hospital complications. Mid- and long-term data are necessary to confirm the durability of this technique.

Ischemic stroke is a devastating complication of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). This risk may be higher in more proximal aneurysms that require arch manipulation. The purpose of this study is to (1) describe 30-day stroke and death rates in patients undergoing TEVAR, (2) compare stroke rates in patients undergoing TEVAR for arch versus descending aneurysm pathology, and (3) identify predictive factors associated with stroke after TEVAR.The Vascular Quality Initiative registry was queried (2015-2021) for TEVAR procedures performed for degenerative aneurysms. Our primary outcomes were any stroke or death at 30 days. Patient-, procedure-, and hospital-level predictors of stroke were assessed using multivariable Poisson regression.Among 3,072 patients with degenerative aneurysms (197 [6.4%] arch versus 2,875 [93.6%] descending) treated with elective TEVAR, the median age was 73 years (interquartile range 67-79) and 54.8% were male. Within the arch aneurysm group, there were 27.4% zone 0, 22.8% zone 1, and 49.8% zone 2 interventions. Overall 30-day stroke and death rates were 3.2% and 3.8%. The distribution of stroke events was bilateral (52.9%), left carotid (20.7%), left vertebrobasilar (11.5%), right carotid (9.2%), and right vertebrobasilar (5.7%). Although mortality was similar between groups, the rate of ischemic stroke was higher for patients undergoing TEVAR for arch aneurysm versus descending aneurysms (7.1% arch versus 2.9% descending, P = 0.001). Factors that were associated with ischemic stroke after TEVAR included age (79 years, relative risk [RR] 1.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-2.98 vs.79 years), dependent functional status (RR 1.73, 95% CI 1.07-2.78), procedural time (RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.15-1.36), and endovascular intervention for supra-aortic trunk revascularization (RR 2.66, 95% CI 1.06-6.70 versus no intervention).Ischemic stroke risk after TEVAR was increased for arch aneurysms compared to descending aneurysms. More proximal zone coverage and endovascular interventions on the supra-aortic trunks were associated with increasing risk for stroke. Adequate preparation for stroke prevention is necessary prior to TEVAR with supra-aortic trunk revascularization.

The frozen elephant trunk stent has greatly facilitated the repair of elective and emergency arch and proximal descending thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections. As one of the few tertiary hospitals that routinely inserts and images the floating and frozen elephant trunk grafts, we aim to provide an up-to-date illustration of the contrasting methods of elephant trunk thoracic aortic aneurysm repair through a computed tomography (CT) review and detail the common radiological interpretation pitfalls in addition to the most significant associated complications.

Prosthetic replacement of the aortic arch requires a cardiopulmonary bypass and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. Thus, it is associated with major perioperative risks, and custom-made devices have been developed. However, the time required for this procedure precludes emergency cases, and anatomical prerequisites limit the creation of appropriate devices. Here, we present a totally endovascular approach that allowed an exclusion of the aortic arch with the usual commercial devices. We explain, step by step, the procedure and the materials carefully selected for each step.

Objective Standard surgical repair of acute type A aortic dissection is associated with high mortality rates, especially in high-risk patients. In an attempt to improve survival in frail patients, we evaluated the outcomes after ascending aorta wrapping in a high-risk patient cohort. Methods This single-center retrospective cohort study included all consecutive patients treated using ascending aorta wrapping for an acute type A aortic dissection from 2008 to 2019. The primary end points included 30-day mortality, survival during follow-up, and dissection-related mortality. Secondary end points included assessment of aortic remodeling after ascending aorta wrapping. Patients with an aortic anatomy suitable for adjunctive endografting of the ascending aorta were also identified. Results Thirty-five consecutive patients who underwent ascending aorta wrapping were included. Their median age was 77 years (range, 46-96 years). The 30-day all-cause mortality rate was 9%. Major complications occurred in 7 patients (21%), including early reinterventions in 11 (31%). Median follow-up was 36 months (range, 2.4-106.6; interquartile range, 72). The actuarial survival at 36 months was 82%. The dissection-related mortality was 11.4%. The median aortic growth of the nonwrapped descending thoracic aorta was 3.4 mm. Computed tomography scan analysis depicted that 88% of survivors were theoretical candidates for an additional endovascular procedure to exclude the primary entry tear. Conclusions Aortic wrapping is associated with favorable early outcomes and a low rate of aortic events during follow-up. This therapeutic option should be considered for patients considered too fragile for standard surgical repair.

The results of best medical treatment (BMT), endovascular based treatment (EBT), and total arch replacement (TAR) with frozen elephant trunk (FET) treatment in a single centre experience were reported in non-A non-B aortic dissection patients.From January 2016 to May 2020, 215 consecutive patients with acute or subacute non-A non-B aortic dissection were enrolled. The primary endpoints were all cause death. Secondary endpoints included follow up adverse aortic event (AE), a composite of the outcomes of dissection related death, rupture, retrograde type A aortic dissection, stent graft induced new entry tear, secondary endoleak, and follow up re-intervention. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to evaluate associations between different treatments and outcomes.Among the 215 dissection patients, 127 (59.1%) received EBT, 42 (19.5%) received TAR + FET, and the remaining 46 (21.4%) received BMT. Thirty day mortality was higher in patients receiving TAR + FET (7.1%) than in those treated with EBT (1.6%) or BMT (2.2%) (p = .12). However, after a median follow up of 39.1 (27.0 - 50.7) months, no additional death was recorded in the TAR + FET group, while nine (7.3%) patients died in the EBT group and 14 (31.8%) died in the BMT group (p.001). Specifically, EBT and TAR + FET showed no significant difference in midterm mortality rate, follow up AE, and re-intervention for complicated or uncomplicated dissection patients involving zone 2. For patients with uncomplicated non-A non-B aortic dissection involving zone 2, EBT could profoundly decrease the mortality rate, follow up AE and re-intervention when compared with BMT (p.010 for all), although this difference was not statistically significant between TAR + FET and BMT. No statistical comparison was performed in patients with zone 1 involvement because of the limited number of patients.It was demonstrated that EBT or TAR + FET might be a viable strategy for non-A non-B aortic dissection patients.

Maternal hypothyroidism is an important problem of modern healthcare and is reported to increase the risk of cardiovascular diseases in the offspring later in life. However, it is unclear whether hypothyroidism during pregnancy causes vascular damage in the fetal period. We established the prenatal hypothyroidism rat model and collected the fetuses at the 21th day of gestation (GD21). Thyroid hormone concentrations in maternal and offspring blood serum were assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The thoracic aortas of the fetuses were isolated for microvessel functional testing and histochemical stainings. qPCR and Western blot were performed to access mRNA and protein expression. We found that the concentrations of thyroid hormones in the serum of pregnant rats and fetuses were significantly suppressed at GD21. The responses of the fetal thoracic aortas to SNP were significantly attenuated in the PTU group. However, no statistical difference was found between the two groups when treated with either inhibitor (ODQ) or activator (BAY58-2667) of sGC. The production of O