Search

BACKGROUND: Recent randomized trials have suggested non-operative management to be a safe alternative to appendectomy for acute uncomplicated appendicitis. Yet, there remains significant variability in treatment approach. This study sought to characterize center-level variation in non-operative management within a national cohort of adults presenting with appendicitis. METHODS: The 2016-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried to identify all adult (≥18 years) hospitalizations for acute uncomplicated appendicitis. Hierarchical, mixed-effects models were developed to ascertain factors linked with non-operative management. Bayesian methodology was applied to predict random effects, which were then used to rank centers by increasing hospital-attributed rate of non-operative management. Institutions with high center-specific rates of non-operative management (>90th percentile) were considered low-operating hospitals (LOH). RESULTS: Of an estimated 447,500 patients, 52,523 (11.7 %) were managed non-operatively. Compared to those undergoing appendectomy, the non-operative cohort was older, more commonly male, and of a higher comorbidity burden. Approximately 30 % in the variability of non-operative management was attributable to hospital effects, with absolute, risk-adjusted rates ranging from 0.5 to 22.5 %. Centers with non-operative management rates ≥90th percentile were considered LOH.Following risk adjustment, among patients undergoing appendectomy, care at LOH was linked with greater odds of postoperative infection, resource utilization, and non-elective readmission. CONCLUSIONS: We identified significant interhospital variation in the utilization of non-operative management for acute uncomplicated appendicitis. Further, we found LOH to be associated with inferior outcomes following surgical management. Future work is needed to assess the care pathways that contribute to increased utilization of non-operative strategies, and disseminate best practices across institutions.

Objective Methods and Materials Results Conclusion This study aimed to examine the diseases requiring surgery during pregnancy, the changes in surgical methods over time, and the characteristics of surgeries performed in different trimesters.A retrospective study conducted at Bundang CHA Hospital between 2006 and 2023 analyzed surgeries performed during pregnancy and compared laparoscopic and open approaches across the three trimesters of pregnancy. Additionally, general (appendicitis, cholecystitis) and gynecologic (heterotopic pregnancy, adnexal torsion) cases were compared.Among 36 181 delivery patients, 101 (0.28%) underwent surgery. The most common conditions were appendicitis (44.6%), cholecystitis (1.9%), heterotopic pregnancy (23.8%), adnexal torsion (27.7%), and cancer (1.9%). The laparoscopic group had a shorter operative time (41.5 ± 19.3 vs. 57.9 ± 33.9 min, p = 0.009) and hospital stay (4.9 ± 2.7 vs. 9.0 ± 9.8 days, p = 0.016) than open surgery group. Heterotopic pregnancy (47.1%) and adnexal torsion (39.2%) were common in the first trimester, whereas appendicitis peaked in the second (80%) and third trimesters (66.7%).The increasing use of assisted reproductive technology (ART) has led to a rise in gynecological patients requiring surgery in the first trimester, resulting in more laparoscopic surgeries during this period. Interestingly, an increase in laparoscopic surgery was also observed in general surgery during the second and third trimesters. Perioperative tocolysis was more frequent (51.1% vs. 3.8%, p < 0.001) and of longer duration (4.6 ± 8.8 vs. 0.1 ± 0.6 days, p = 0.001) after general surgical procedures.Laparoscopic surgery during pregnancy offers several advantages such as shorter operative time and hospital stay. Since 2011, laparoscopic surgery for the entire gestational period has been on the rise. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Hospital length of stay (LOS) following admission for appendicitis is difficult to predict. Shock index, pediatric age adjusted (SIPA) accurately identifies severely injured trauma patients and predicts mortality among children admitted to the ICU. Our aim was to determine if elevated SIPA at presentation, and time to normalization of SIPA, can identify children with perforated appendicitis and predict hospital LOS. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of children 1–17 years admitted to a quaternary care referral center with appendicitis after appendectomy in 2021. The primary outcomes were presence of perforated appendicitis and hospital LOS. Generalized linear regressions were performed. Covariates included in all models were age, sex, fecalith, initial temperature, and time from diagnosis to OR. Results: We included 169 patients; 53 (31.4%) had perforated appendicitis. After adjustment, elevated SIPA was associated with presence of perforated appendicitis (p = 0.0002) and longer LOS (p < 0.0001). A patient presenting with appendicitis and elevated SIPA had 5.447 times higher odds of having perforated appendicitis (95% CI: 2.262, 13.826), a mean hospital LOS 2.047 times longer (95% CI: 1.564, 2.683), a mean time to toleration of regular diet 4.995 times longer (95% CI: 2.914, 8.918), and a mean duration of antibiotics that is 1.761 times longer (95% CI: 1.383, 2.243) than a patient with normal SIPA. Conclusion: In children with appendicitis, elevated SIPA at presentation is associated with higher risk of perforation. These findings support the incorporation of SIPA during triage of patients with appendicitis and counseling families after surgery. Level of evidence: Level 3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Large B‐cell lymphomas (LBLs) comprise a genetically heterogeneous group of clinically aggressive non‐Hodgkin lymphomas, frequently exhibiting overlapping features with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma and Burkitt's lymphoma. We report a case of a 24‐year‐old, previously healthy male with a classical clinical presentation of acute appendicitis. The pathologic examination discovered a large B‐cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL6 rearrangements in the excised appendix. The patient was assigned Stage IEA, IPI = 0 and received chemotherapy. This case depicts a very uncommon occurrence of fully localized LBL in a patient of an unusually young age and clinical presentation for this type of lymphoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective Methods Results Conclusion This systematic review and network meta‐analysis compared various antibiotic treatments with surgical treatment for acute appendicitis.We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Wanfang databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that met the prespecified inclusion criteria up to July 2023. The interventions included various antibiotics and surgery. The outcomes measured were initial treatment success, treatment success at 1‐year follow‐up, and treatment‐related complications. Meta‐analysis was conducted using R software with the gemtc package. Surfaces under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA) were used to rank the interventions.Thirteen RCTs involving nine treatments (cefotaxime [CTX] + tinidazole [TNZ], CTX + metronidazole [MTZ], ampicillin [AMP] + gentamicin [GEN] + MTZ, amoxicillin/clavulanate [AMC] + GEN, meropenem [MEM] + MTZ, AMC, ertapenem [ETP] + MTZ, ETP, and surgery) were included in this network meta‐analysis. In head‐to‐head comparisons, no statistically significant difference was found between any two interventions for initial treatment success (p > 0.05). The SUCRA indicated that surgery ranked first (SUCRA, 66.5%) for initial treatment success. Surgery was associated with an increased treatment success rate at 1‐year follow‐up compared to AMC (OR = 0.01, 95% CrI = 0.00–0.14, p < 0.05), MEM + MTZ (OR = 0.06, 95% CrI = 0.00–0.42, p < 0.05), and AMP + GEN + MTZ (OR = 0.02, 95% CrI = 0.00–0.23, p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found between any two interventions regarding complications (p > 0.05).Our network meta‐analysis suggests that surgery ranks highest for initial treatment success and treatment success at 1‐year follow‐up. However, surgery may increase the complication rate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Surgeons are sometimes reluctant to manage uncomplicated appendicitis non‐operatively. Reasons cited include the risk of recurrent appendicitis and the risk of missed appendiceal malignancy. The aim of this study was to address these uncertainties and determine the long‐term efficacy of antibiotic versus operative management of appendicitis. Method: One‐year follow‐up of patients enrolled in the multicentre, COVID:HAREM cohort study during March‐June 2020 was performed. Initial operative or non‐operative management was determined on a case‐by‐case basis by the responsible surgeon. Outcomes were appendicectomy rate at 1‐year, histology of removed appendix and predictors of unsuccessful antibiotic treatment. Results: A total of 625 patients who had non‐operative management were included. Emergency appendicectomy had been performed by 1‐year in 24% (149/625), with a median time to appendicectomy of 12 days [IQR 1–77] from presentation. Thirty‐one patients had elective appendicectomy. Normal histology was reported in 6% of emergency procedures and 58% of elective ones. There were 7 malignancies and 3 neuroendocrine tumors identified at histology. All patients with malignant histology had ≥1 risk factors for malignancy at initial presentation. Faecolithiasis (hazard ratios (HR) 2.3, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.51–3.49) and a high Adult Appendicitis Score (AAS >16; HR 2.44, 95% CI 1.52–3.92) were independent risk factors for unsuccessful non‐operative management. Conclusion: At 1 year, 71% of patients managed non‐operatively did not undergo an appendicectomy. Recurrence of appendicitis was associated with faecolithiasis and a high AAS. Patients at higher risk for appendiceal malignancy should have targeted follow‐up. These factors should be considered when counseling patients on non‐operative management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Appendiceal mucocele is a rare entity first described by Carl von Rokitansky, characterized by cystic dilatation of the appendiceal lumen due to obstruction, epithelial proliferation or inflammation and accumulation of mucoid material. The cause can be either neoplastic or non-neoplastic. Patients with appendiceal mucocele can be asymptomatic or present with right lower quadrant pain which may mimic acute appendicitis. We present the case of a 68-year-old male, who presented to the Emergency Room with a two-day history of right lower quadrant pain, nausea, vomiting and loss of appetite. Abdominal examination revealed tenderness over the Mc Burney point with localized guarding and laboratory results showed leukocytosis with neutrophilia. The abdominal computed tomography revealed a cystic dilated appendix, with a length of 130 mm and a diameter of 75 mm, situated ascending retrocecal and associating peri-appendicular inflammatory changes. The patient underwent right hemicolectomy with side-to-side ileo-colonic anastomosis, due to a wide intraluminal communication between the appendix and the cecum and the inflammation of both structures. Histopathological examination showed both high-grade and low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A leading cause of emergency abdominal surgery, appendicitis is a common condition affecting millions of people worldwide. Automatic and accurate segmentation of the appendix from medical imaging is a challenging task, due to its small size, variability in shape, and proximity to other anatomical structures. Methods: In this study, we propose a backbone-enriched Mask R-CNN architecture (MaskAppendix) on the Detectron platform, enhanced with Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM), for precise appendix segmentation on computed tomography (CT) scans. In the proposed MaskAppendix deep learning model, ResNet101 network is used as the backbone. By integrating Grad-CAM into the MaskAppendix network, our model improves feature localization, allowing it to better capture subtle variations in appendix morphology. Results: We conduct extensive experiments on a dataset of abdominal CT scans, demonstrating that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance in appendix segmentation, outperforming traditional segmentation techniques in terms of both accuracy and robustness. In the automatic segmentation of the appendix region in CT slices, a DSC score of 87.17% was achieved with the proposed approach, and the results obtained have the potential to improve clinical diagnostic accuracy. Conclusions: This framework provides an effective tool for aiding clinicians in the diagnosis of appendicitis and other related conditions, reducing the potential for diagnostic errors and enhancing clinical workflow efficiency. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Practice patterns of same-day discharge for pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy for non-perforated appendicitis are not well-analyzed. Our aim is to evaluate current practice patterns and outcomes of same-day discharge for these patients. Methods: NSQIP-P retrospective registry identified patients (2017–2021) who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for non-perforated appendicitis. Annual same-day discharge (SDD) rate was determined. SDD patients were compared to those discharged postoperative days 1–2 (non-SDD). Sub-group analysis was performed on ICD-10 code K35.30. Regression was performed. Results: Overall, 67,214 patients were identified. The SDD rate increased from 33.3% (2017) to 52.5% (2021) with decreased 30-day readmissions between SDD and non-SDD (1.3% vs 2.1%, p < 0.001). Sub-group analysis identified 7,330 patients with SDD rates from 50.7% (2019) to 60.4% (2021) with decreased 30-day readmissions (1.3% vs 2.1%, p < 0.001) for SDD versus non-SDD. No increase in adverse events for SDD occurred in either analysis. Regression identified esophageal/gastric/intestinal diseases increased odds of early readmission or reoperation (OR 1.85, p = 0.042). Conclusion: Same-day discharge after pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy for non-perforated acute appendicitis continues to increase in frequency without a significant increase in adverse outcomes. SDD rates are 20–30% lower than previously published single-center studies, indicating there is a likely a larger percentage of patients that could discharge same-day. Level of evidence (I–V): Level III. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Acute right iliac fossa (RIF) pain is a common presenting symptom in surgical patients, with a wide range of differentials, particularly in premenopausal females. This study explores ultrasound usage in the management of women aged 16–55 years presenting with RIF pain. Methods: A total of 1,082 patients who presented to a tertiary hospital over 12 months were included. Data were collected from patients' electronic records, including initial clinical impression, imaging, management, operative findings, histology and subsequent hospital attendances within 6 weeks and within 6 months. Results: Following clinical assessment, 607 (56%) of patients underwent an ultrasound. Of these, 280 (25.9%) patients received no radiological imaging on initial presentation, and 252 (42%) had pathology identified on ultrasound. The most common finding was an ovarian cyst, closely followed by unexplained free pelvic fluid. Of the 607 patients scanned, 29 (4.8%) had an ultrasound diagnosis of appendicitis; 254 of 1,082 (23.5%) patients underwent operative management. Of the 254 patients who had surgery, 179 (70.5%) had preoperative imaging. Of the 29 (11.4%) cases where the intraoperative finding was gynaecological, 15 (51.7%) cases had not had any preoperative imaging. The negative appendicectomy rate was 21.3% (45/211). Of the 45 patients who had a histologically normal appendix, 22 (48.9%) had not had any previous imaging. Ultrasound had a specificity of 78% for diagnosing appendicitis. Conclusions: In patients who underwent operative management, a negative finding or finding not requiring surgical management was associated with no preoperative imaging. This supports the use of ultrasound scans as an adjunct in a multimodal approach to the assessment of women presenting with RIF pain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Emergency surgery (ES) for complicated appendicitis (CA) is associated with high morbidity. Interval appendectomy (IA) decreases this rate; however, nonoperative management (NOM) is not always successful. Some patients require unplanned ES due to NOM failure (IA failure: IA-F). This study aimed to verify the benefits of IA and to evaluate the risk factors for NOM failure. Methods: Patients diagnosed with CA who underwent surgery between January 2012 and December 2021 were included in this study. We compared the surgical outcomes of the ES group with those of the IA success (IA-S) and IA-F groups. We also analyzed 14 factors that predicted NOM failure. Results: Among 302 patients, the rate of severe complications (Clavien–Dindo grade ≥ III) was significantly higher in the ES group (N = 165) than in the IA-S group (N = 102). The rates were equal between the ES (N = 165) and IA-F (N = 35) groups. NOM was successful in 110 patients and failed in 27. Lack of abscesses, comorbidities, high WBC count, and free air were independent risk factors for NOM failure. Conclusions: Considering the benefits of IA and the non-inferior surgical outcomes of IA-F compared to ES, IA is a good therapeutic strategy for CA. However, in patients exhibiting four independent risk factors for NOM failure, careful monitoring of unplanned ES is necessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objective: Cases of appendicitis were identified in the pivotal randomized clinical trial on BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine and reported from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine pharmacovigilance systems. Three cohort studies and two self-controlled case series (SCCS) studies evaluating the association between mRNA vaccines and appendicitis reported discordant results. To address this uncertainty, the present study examines in a large population, with a SCCS design, the association between mRNA (BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273) and, for the first time, viral vector (ChAdOx1-S and Ad26.COV2-S) COVID-19 vaccines and acute appendicitis. Methods: The SCCS study design was used to evaluate the association between COVID-19 vaccination and subsequent onset of acute appendicitis. The study was based on record linkage of health archives through TheShinISS application, a statistical tool that locally processes data from regional health care databases according to ad hoc, study-tailored and common data model. The study population included all vaccinated subjects ≥ 12 years old between 27 December 2020 and 30 September 2021. The acute appendicitis was identified through discharge diagnoses of hospital admissions or emergency department visits. Incident cases were defined as those who experienced a first event of acute appendicitis in the study period, excluding subjects with a diagnosis of appendicitis in the previous 5 years. Exposure was defined as the first or second dose of BNT162b2, mRNA-1273 and ChAdOx1-S and the single dose of Ad26.COV2-S. The risk interval was defined as 42 days from the first or second vaccination dose and divided into pre-specified risk subperiods; the reference period was the observation time outside the risk interval. Relative incidences (RI) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated with the SCCS method 'modified for event-dependent exposures', through unbiased estimating equations. The seasonal component was considered as a time-dependent covariate. Results: In the 42-day risk interval 1285 incident cases of acute appendicitis occurred: 727 cases after the first dose and 558 cases after the second dose. In the main analysis, no increased risks of acute appendicitis were observed in subjects vaccinated with BNT162b, mRNA-1273, ChAdOx1-S and Ad26.COV2-S. The subgroup analyses by sex showed an increased risk in the 14–27 day risk interval, in males after the first dose of mRNA-1273 (RI of 1.71; 95% CI 1.08–2.70, p = 0.02) and in females after the single dose of Ad26.COV2-S (RI of 4.40; 95% CI 1.29–15.01, p = 0.02). Conclusions: There was no evidence of association of BNT162b, ChAdOx1-S, mRNA-1273 and Ad26.COV2-S with acute appendicitis in the general population. The results of the subgroup analyses by sex needs to be considered with caution. The multiplicity issue cannot be excluded being these hypotheses two of several hypotheses tested. In addition, relevant literature on the biological mechanism of the disease and evidence of similar effects with other vaccines or with the same vaccines are still lacking to provide strong support for a conclusion that there is an harmful effect in males and females with mRNA-1273 and Ad26.COV2-S. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents a case study of a 17-year-old male who developed perforated appendicitis during the re-nourishment phase of treatment for an eating disorder. Topics discussed include the patient's significant weight loss and dietary practices, the medical team's management of his bradycardia and nutritional rehabilitation, and the complications that arose during hospitalization, ultimately leading to emergency surgery.