Search

Rationale and Objectives: Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is mandatory before transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy of artificial intelligence (AI)-powered software in automatically analyzing cardiac parameters from pre-procedural CCTA to predict major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in TAVR patients., Materials and Methods: Patients undergoing pre-TAVR CCTA were retrospectively included. AI software automatically extracted 34 morphologic and volumetric cardiac parameters characterizing the ventricles, atria, myocardium, and epicardial adipose tissue. Clinical information and outcomes were recorded from institutional database. Cox regression analysis identified predictors of MACE, including non-fatal myocardial infarction, heart failure hospitalization, unstable angina, and cardiac death. Model performance was evaluated with Harrell's C-index, and nested models were compared using the likelihood ratio test. Manual analysis of 170 patients assessed agreement with automated measurements., Results: Among the 648 enrolled patients (77 ± 9.3 years, 58.9% men), 116 (17.9%) experienced MACE within a median follow-up of 24 months (interquartile range 10-40). After adjusting for clinical parameters, only left ventricle long axis shortening (LV-LAS) was an independent predictor of MACE (hazard ratio [HR], 1.05 [95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.11]; p = 0.04), with significantly improved C-index (0.620 vs. 0.633; p < 0.001). When adjusted for the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality score, LV-LAS was also predictive of MACE (HR, 1.08 [95%CI, 1.03-1.13]; p = 0.002), while improving model performance (C-index: 0.557 vs. 0.598; p < 0.001). All parameters showed good or excellent agreement with manual measurements., Conclusion: Automated AI-based comprehensive cardiac assessment enables pre-TAVR MACE prediction, with LV-LAS outperforming all other parameters., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors of this manuscript declare relationships with the following companies: A.V-S.: receives institutional research support and/or personal subscriptions from Siemens and Elucid Bioimaging; U.J.S.: receives institutional research support and/or personal fees by Bayer, Bracco, Elucid BioImaging, Guerbet, HeartFlow, Inc., Keya Medical, and Siemens; A.J.: is an employee of Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc; P.S.: is an employee of Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc; S.R.: is an employee of Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc; J.O.: is an employee of Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc; T.E.: receives travel support and speaker fee from Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc, institutional research support by Siemens Healthineers and is a consultant for Circle Cardiovascular Imaging; For the remaining authors, none were declared., (Copyright © 2024 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Since its inaugural issue in 2019, Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging has disseminated the latest scientific advances and technical developments in cardiac, vascular, and thoracic imaging. In this review, we highlight select articles published in this journal between October 2021 and October 2022. The scope of the review encompasses various aspects of coronary artery and congenital heart diseases, vascular diseases, thoracic imaging, and health services research. Key highlights include changes in the revised Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System 2.0, the value of coronary CT angiography in informing prognosis and guiding treatment decisions, cardiac MRI findings after COVID-19 vaccination or infection, high-risk features at CT angiography to identify patients with aortic dissection at risk for late adverse events, and CT-guided fiducial marker placement for preoperative planning for pulmonary nodules. Ongoing research and future directions include photon-counting CT and artificial intelligence applications in cardiovascular imaging. Keywords: Pediatrics, CT Angiography, CT-Perfusion, CT-Spectral Imaging, MR Angiography, PET/CT, Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation/Replacement (TAVI/TAVR), Cardiac, Pulmonary, Vascular, Aorta, Coronary Arteries © RSNA, 2023., Competing Interests: Disclosures of conflicts of interest: D.M. Grants or contracts from the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (no. 5T32EB009035); consulting fees from Segmed; stock or stock options in Segmed; member of Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging trainee editorial board. G.J.A. Member of Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging trainee editorial board. K.G.O. Payment or honoraria from Grand Rounds for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events; president of the Society of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance; associate editor for Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging. D.V. Treasurer of the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging; member of Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging editorial board; mentor for Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging trainee editorial board. D.F. Deputy editor for Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging. S.A. Royalties from Elsevier for textbook authorship; member of the board of directors of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography; editor of Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging. K.H. Payment or honoraria from Sanofi Genzyme for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events; associate editor and trainee editorial board lead for Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging., (© 2023 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.)

BACKGROUND. Deep learning-based convolutional neural networks have enabled major advances in development of artificial intelligence (AI) software applications. Modern AI applications offer comprehensive multiorgan evaluation. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article was to evaluate the impact of an automated AI platform integrated into clinical workflow for chest CT interpretation on radiologists' interpretation times when evaluated in a real-world clinical setting. METHODS. In this prospective single-center study, a commercial AI software solution was integrated into clinical workflow for chest CT interpretation. The software provided automated analysis of cardiac, pulmonary, and musculoskeletal findings, including labeling, segmenting, and measuring normal structures as well as detecting, labeling, and measuring abnormalities. AI-annotated images and autogenerated summary results were stored in the PACS and available to interpreting radiologists. A total of 390 patients (204 women, 186 men; mean age, 62.8 ± 13.3 [SD] years) who underwent out-patient chest CT between January 19, 2021, and January 28, 2021, were included. Scans were randomized using 1:1 allocation between AI-assisted and non-AI-assisted arms and were clinically interpreted by one of three cardiothoracic radiologists (65 scans per arm per radiologist; total of 195 scans per arm) who recorded interpretation times using a stopwatch. Findings were categorized according to review of report impressions. Interpretation times were compared between arms. RESULTS. Mean interpretation times were significantly shorter in the AI-assisted than in the non-AI-assisted arm for all three readers (289 ± 89 vs 344 ± 129 seconds, p < .001; 449 ± 110 vs 649 ± 82 seconds, p < .001; 281 ± 114 vs 348 ± 93 seconds, p = .01) and for readers combined (328 ± 122 vs 421 ± 175 seconds, p < .001). For readers combined, the mean difference was 93 seconds (95% CI, 63-123 seconds), corresponding with a 22.1% reduction in the AI-assisted arm. Mean interpretation time was also shorter in the AI-assisted arm compared with the non-AI-assisted arm for contrast-enhanced scans (83 seconds), noncontrast scans (104 seconds), negative scans (84 seconds), positive scans without significant new findings (117 seconds), and positive scans with significant new findings (92 seconds). CONCLUSION. Cardiothoracic radiologists exhibited a 22.1% reduction in chest CT interpretations times when they had access to results from an automated AI support platform during real-world clinical practice. CLINICAL IMPACT. Integration of the AI support platform into clinical workflow improved radiologist efficiency.

BACKGROUND. Cardiac CTA is required for preprocedural workup before transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and can be used to assess functional parameters of the left atrium (LA). OBJECTIVE. We aimed to evaluate the utility of functional and volumetric LA parameters derived from cardiac CTA to predict mortality in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing TAVR. METHODS. This retrospective study included 175 patients with severe AS (92 men, 83 women; median age, 79.0 years) who underwent cardiac CTA for clinical pre-TAVR assessment. A postdoctoral research fellow calculated maximum and minimum LA volumes using biplane area-length measurements; these values were indexed to body surface area, and maximum and minimum LA volume index (LAVI max and LAVI min , respectively) values were calculated. The LA emptying fraction (LAEF) was automatically calculated. All-cause mortality within a 24-month follow-up period after TAVR was recorded. To identify parameters predictive of mortality, Cox regression analysis was performed, and results were summarized by hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CI. The Harrell C-index was used to assess model performance. A radiology resident repeated the measurements in a random sample of 20% ( n = 35) of the cases, and interobserver agreement was computed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS. Thirty-eight deaths (21.7%) were recorded within a median follow-up of 21 months. LAVI max (HR, 1.02 [95% CI, 1.01-1.04]; p = .01), LAVI min (HR, 1.02 [95% CI, 1.01-1.04]; p < .001), and LAEF (HR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.95-0.99]; p = .002) were predictive of mortality in univariable analysis. After adjusting for clinical parameters, only LAEF (HR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.94-0.99]; p = .02) independently predicted mortality. The C-index of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality (STS-PROM) significantly increased from 0.636 to 0.683, 0.694, and 0.700 when incorporating into the model LAVI max , LAVI min , and LAEF, respectively. The ICC for maximum and minimum LA volumes and LAEF ranged from 0.94 to 0.99. CONCLUSION. LAEF derived from preprocedural cardiac CTA independently predicts mortality in patients with severe AS undergoing TAVR. CLINICAL IMPACT. Cardiac CTA-derived LA function, evaluated during pre-TAVR workup, can be used to assess preprocedural risk and may improve risk stratification in post-TAVR surveillance.