Isabel C. Hageman, Hendrik J.J. van der Steeg, Ekkehart Jenetzky, Misel Trajanovska, Sebastian K. King, Ivo de Blaauw, Iris A.L.M. van Rooij, Dalia Aminoff, Eva Amerstorfer, Holger Till, Piero Bagolan, Barbara Iacobelli, Hakan Çavuşoğlu, Onur Ozen, Stefan Deluggi, Johanna Ludwiczek, Emre Divarci, María Fanjul, Francesco Fascetti-Leon, Araceli García Vázquez, Carlos Giné, Ramon Gorter, Justin de Jong, Jan Goseman, Martin Lacher, Caterina Grano, Sabine Grasshoff-Derr, Michel Haanen, Ernesto Leva, Anna Morandi, Gabriele Lisi, Igor Makedonsky, Carlo Marcelis, Paola Midrio, Marc Miserez, Mazeena Mohideen, Alessio PiniPrato, Carlos Reck-Burneo, Heiko Reutter, Stephan Rohleder, Inbal Samuk, Eberhard Schmiedeke, Nicole Schwarzer, Pim Sloots, Pernilla Stenström, Chris Verhaak, Alejandra Vilanova-Sánchez, Patrick Volk, Marieke Witvliet, Paediatric Surgery, AGEM - Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, and ARD - Amsterdam Reproduction and Development
Background: Registries are important in rare disease research. The Anorectal Malformation Network (ARM-Net) registry is a well-established European patient registry collecting demographic, clinical, and functional outcome data. We assessed the quality of this registry through review of the structure, data elements, collected data, and user experience. Material and methods: Design and data elements were assessed for completeness, consistency, usefulness, accuracy, validity, and comparability. An intra- and inter-user variability study was conducted through monitoring and re-registration of patients. User experience was assessed via a questionnaire on registration, design of registry, and satisfaction. Results: We evaluated 119 data elements, of which 107 were utilized and comprised 42 string and 65 numeric elements. A minority (37.0%) of the 2278 included records had complete data, though this improved to 83.5% when follow-up elements were excluded. Intra-observer variability demonstrated 11.7% incongruence, while inter-observer variability was 14.7%. Users were predominantly pediatric surgeons and typically registered patients within 11–30 min. Users did not experience any significant difficulties with data entry and were generally satisfied with the registry, but preferred more longitudinal data and patient-reported outcomes. Conclusions: The ARM-Net registry presents one of the largest ARM cohorts. Although its collected data are valuable, they are susceptible to error and user variability. Continuous evaluations are required to maintain relevant and high-quality data and to achieve long-term sustainability. With the recommendations resulting from this study, we call for rare disease patient registries to take example and aim to continuously improve their data quality to enhance the small, but impactful, field of rare disease research. Level of Evidence: V.