Search

Objective: To assess physician-patient communication and identify the frequency of use of specific communication techniques by analyzing recordings of routinely scheduled medical encounters for patients with clinician-identified chronic migraine., Background: Chronic migraine is an under-diagnosed, under-treated, and highly burdensome disease. Effective medical communication is integral to optimal medical care, including providing accurate diagnoses, creating effective treatment plans, and enhancing patient adherence. Communication patterns during office visits may be a target for intervention to improve outcomes for people with chronic migraine., Design: This was a prospective, observational study based on analysis of audio recordings collected during neurologist-patient chronic migraine dialogues., Methods: Twenty neurologists from a US neurology panel maintained by Verilogue, Inc., a research organization specializing in healthcare dialogues, were invited to identify patients with chronic migraine and record clinical encounters with their patients. Both new patient visits and follow-up visits were included in this analysis. Neurologist-patient dialogues were audio-recorded, anonymized, transcribed, and analyzed by a sociolinguist for the presence of prespecified communication parameters, strategies, and specific language indicative of optimal migraine-related medical care., Results: Fourteen out of the 20 invited neurologists (70.0%) accepted the study invitation and recorded 35 encounters with patients eligible for the study. The patient sample was 91.4% female (n = 32/35), with a mean age of 46 years. On average, there were 17 headache-related questions per visit; 82.0% of questions were closed-ended (n = 369/450). Headache/migraine frequency was elicited in 77.1% of the dialogues (n = 27/35), but headache days per month was assessed in only a single dialogue. Only one neurologist utilized the ask-tell-ask technique. Headache-related disability was discussed in 22.9%of the dialogues (n = 8/35), with only one using open-ended questions. None of the dialogues discussed ictal vs interictal headache-related disability. Chronic migraine was mentioned in 8.6% of dialogues (n = 3/35) and treatment plans were discussed in 37.1% of the dialogues (n = 13/35)., Conclusions: Results from this preliminary study showed that the majority of the neurologist-chronic migraine patient dialogues did not assess elements crucial for diagnosis and treatment (eg, headache days per month and headache related disability) or use standard communication techniques (eg, open-ended questions, ask-tell-ask). We recommend intervention studies designed to assess the benefits of improved communication on diagnostic accuracy, treatment decisions, and patient reported outcomes., (© 2018 American Headache Society.)

Background: Longstanding uncertainty surrounds the selection of surgical protocols for unilateral cleft lip and palate, and randomised trials have only rarely been performed. The Scandcleft Project consists of three trials commenced in 1997 involving ten centres in Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden, and the UK. Three groups of centres tested a newly-defined common technique for palatal repair (Arm A) against their local protocols (Arms B, C, D). Arm A was familiar to most of the surgeons in Trial 1, but not to the surgeons in the other Trials., Aim: To evaluate surgical events and complications of the 448 (293 boys, 155 girls) patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) enrolled in the three trials., Method: The three trials were carried out in parallel in adherence with a fully developed, ethically approved protocol. Operative time, bleeding, complications, and major dehiscence during and after both primary surgeries were recorded by the surgeon. Rates of fistula and surgery for velopharyngeal incompetence (VPI) were assessed until the youngest patient of the study had reached the age of 9 years. Pearson Chi-square statistical analysis was used to compare the outcomes., Results: No significant differences in bleeding, infection, anaesthetic complications or length of hospital stay between the different arms were found for Trial 1. However, in Trials 2 and 3 there were more airway problems in Arm A than with the traditional local protocols (Arms C or D). In Trial 3 fistula and VPI surgery rates were also higher in Arm A., Conclusions: The results do not provide statistical evidence that any technique is better than others, but indicate that surgery was more problematic for surgeons who were still gaining experience with an unfamiliar surgical protocol., Trial Registration: ISRCTN29932826.

Background and Aims: Longstanding uncertainty surrounds the selection of surgical protocols for the closure of unilateral cleft lip and palate, and randomised trials have only rarely been performed. This paper is an introduction to three randomised trials of primary surgery for children born with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). It presents the protocol developed for the trials in CONSORT format, and describes the management structure that was developed to achieve the long-term engagement and commitment required to complete the project., Method: Ten established national or regional cleft centres participated. Lip and soft palate closure at 3-4 months, and hard palate closure at 12 months served as a common method in each trial. Trial 1 compared this with hard palate closure at 36 months. Trial 2 compared it with lip closure at 3-4 months and hard and soft palate closure at 12 months. Trial 3 compared it with lip and hard palate closure at 3-4 months and soft palate closure at 12 months. The primary outcomes were speech and dentofacial development, with a series of perioperative and longer-term secondary outcomes., Results: Recruitment of 448 infants took place over a 9-year period, with 99.8% subsequent retention at 5 years., Conclusion: The series of reports that follow this introductory paper include comparisons at age 5 of surgical outcomes, speech outcomes, measures of dentofacial development and appearance, and parental satisfaction. The outcomes recorded and the numbers analysed for each outcome and time point are described in the series., Trial Registration: ISRCTN29932826.

The aim of this study was to estimate the clinical condition and amount of remaining grafted bone 20 years after final repair of unilateral cleft lip and palate. Eighteen consecutive patients had computed tomograms (CT) and clinical examination 20 years or more after secondary bone grafting which had been done at ages of 7-11 years. The images were obtained with a spiral CT with 1 mm collimation, and reconstructed as three-dimensional volumes with reformatted cut planes. The area of grafted bone was measured in a plane perpendicular to the curved axis of the alveolar arch and compared with the area corresponding section through the non-cleft side. The clinical examination showed satisfactory results in all. CT indicated a mean cross sectional area of 97 mm2 on the cleft side compared with 157 mm2 on the non-cleft side. The bone mass was significantly less on the grafted cleft side (p < 0.001), but the functional results were satisfactory.

The management of the hypoplastic midface in syndromic craniosynostosis remains a great challenge. Frequently, patients have to be operated on numerous times to achieve a satisfactory end result, partially because of the limited skeletal advancement possible when using traditional surgical techniques. During the last decade, however, methods for gradual midfacial distraction have been presented, whereby greater advancements can be obtained. We present four children aged 17 months to 15 years with severe syndromal craniosynostosis in need of midface advancements because of severe respiratory obstruction or severe exophthalmos. These patients were complex cases with several previous craniofacial surgeries (mean of three times, range of two to six times) that yielded insufficient skeletal advancements. They were operated on with gradual monobloc advancements using the Modular Internal Distraction System. The mean length of operations was 370 minutes (range: 240-455 minutes), and the mean amount of perioperative blood transfusion needed was 1,300 ml (range: 280-2,700 ml) or 66.9 ml/kg (range: 31.1-94.9 ml/kg). The patient with the greatest number of previous operations also had the longest operation time as well as the most blood loss. The average midface advancement obtained was 25 mm (range: 20-30 mm), resulting in cessation or a significant decrease of preoperative respiratory problems, reduced exophthalmos, and improved facial profile. Apart from a local infection in one patient with a connective tissue disorder and several previous wound infections, no major postoperative complications were recorded. Distraction osteogenesis has become a versatile and safe technique that allows for large advancements of the midface.

Frontoethmoidal meningoencephalocele is a rare congenital disease where intracranial masses protrudes through a midline defect at foramen coecum from the anterior cranial fossa into the facial skeleton. The patient presents at birth with a soft-tissue swelling at the nasal bridge. In the majority of cases, the cele is completely covered by skin. The face is elongated, the nasal bridge is broad, the upper part of the nose is long, and the patients have telecanthus. Frequently, the patients have a normal psychomotor development, but may have intracerebral malformations and a shunt dependent hydrocephalus. Spinal fluid leakage may result in meningitis. Anosmia is infrequent. The patients may have a wide range of ophthalmological problems. Newborns with meningoencephalocele should be examined by a neurosurgeon. The investigation and work-up commences with a multidisciplinary approach. We present two patients with meningoencephaloceles.

A double blind, randomised controlled trial was performed to compare the amount of pain experienced after subcutaneous infiltration of lignocaine with adrenaline, and the same anaesthetic buffered to pH 7.1-7.3, in patients undergoing liposuction (n = 8), blepharoplasty (n = 7), mammaplasty (n = 6), and in volunteers (n = 10). A linear analogue pain scale was used to access pain. In all four groups the buffered solution caused significantly less pain (p < 0.001 except for mammaplasty--p = 0.02).

This article briefly discusses laser theory and medical use of different types of laser, laserphysics and laser properties. The indications for lasertherapy as claimed from laser-producers, are numerous. However, we recommend that the effect of treatment with low level laser therapy has to be more documented before general use in a dental practice.