Search

A long-standing topic of interest in human neurosciences is the understanding of the neurobiology underlying human cognition. Less commonly considered is to what extent such systems may be shared with other species. We examined individual variation in brain connectivity in the context of cognitive abilities in chimpanzees (n = 45) and humans in search of a conserved link between cognition and brain connectivity across the two species. Cognitive scores were assessed on a variety of behavioral tasks using chimpanzee- and human-specific cognitive test batteries, measuring aspects of cognition related to relational reasoning, processing speed, and problem solving in both species. We show that chimpanzees scoring higher on such cognitive skills display relatively strong connectivity among brain networks also associated with comparable cognitive abilities in the human group. We also identified divergence in brain networks that serve specialized functions across humans and chimpanzees, such as stronger language connectivity in humans and relatively more prominent connectivity between regions related to spatial working memory in chimpanzees. Our findings suggest that core neural systems of cognition may have evolved before the divergence of chimpanzees and humans, along with potential differential investments in other brain networks relating to specific functional specializations between the two species.

A long-standing topic of interest in human neurosciences is the understanding of the neurobiology underlying human cognition. Less commonly considered is to what extent such systems may be shared with other species. We examined individual variation in brain connectivity in the context of cognitive abilities in chimpanzees (n = 45) and humans in search of a conserved link between cognition and brain connectivity across the two species. Cognitive scores were assessed on a variety of behavioral tasks using chimpanzee- and human-specific cognitive test batteries, measuring aspects of cognition related to relational reasoning, processing speed, and problem solving in both species. We show that chimpanzees scoring higher on such cognitive skills display relatively strong connectivity among brain networks also associated with comparable cognitive abilities in the human group. We also identified divergence in brain networks that serve specialized functions across humans and chimpanzees, such as stronger language connectivity in humans and relatively more prominent connectivity between regions related to spatial working memory in chimpanzees. Our findings suggest that core neural systems of cognition may have evolved before the divergence of chimpanzees and humans, along with potential differential investments in other brain networks relating to specific functional specializations between the two species.

The brain is an intricate organ responsible for dealing with our thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. The human brain tripled in size during recent evolution, while the rest of our body stayed more or less the same size. This remarkable change has inspired brain researchers to investigate why such brain expansion took place, and how it affects the way our brain works. In this thesis, we investigated the organization of the brain’s wiring by looking at the connections between each part of the brain and how they form a complex network — the connectome. We compared the human connectome to that of other primate species, including chimpanzees, gorillas, rhesus monkeys, and capuchin monkeys. We found that all these connectomes have important aspects in common: They are wired in an efficient way and contain ‘shortcuts’ between important brain regions for quick communication of information. At the same time, they show subtle differences in their wiring organization that are closely linked with their brain size. For example, larger brains have relatively less long-range connections, likely because long connections take up more and more space in larger brains. Larger brains also show more specialization of connectivity, especially between the left and right sides of the brain. The findings of this thesis help our understanding of human brain evolution by showing the relationships between brain size and connectome organization in a wide range of monkeys and apes. Our work suggests that primate brains are wired according to a shared connectome blueprint, with key aspects of connectome organization found in all the studied species. Brain size and adaptations to specific environments form the variations on this conserved blueprint. In the case of humans, our big brains may have paved the way for extensive specialization of brain connectivity, leading to specialized brain functions such as language and highly developed cognition.

Brains come in many shapes and sizes. Nature has endowed big-brained primate species like humans with a proportionally large cerebral cortex. Comparative studies have suggested, however, that the total volume allocated to white matter connectivity-the brain's infrastructure for long-range interregional communication-does not keep pace with the cortex. We investigated the consequences of this allometric scaling on brain connectivity and network organization. We collated structural and diffusion magnetic resonance imaging data across 14 primate species, describing a comprehensive 350-fold range in brain size across species. We show volumetric scaling relationships that indeed point toward a restriction of macroscale connectivity in bigger brains. We report cortical surface area to outpace white matter volume, with larger brains showing lower levels of overall connectedness particularly through sparser long-range connectivity. We show that these constraints on white matter connectivity are associated with longer communication paths, higher local network clustering, and higher levels of asymmetry in connectivity patterns between homologous areas across the left and right hemispheres. Our findings reveal conserved scaling relationships of major brain components and show consequences for macroscale brain circuitry, providing insights into the connectome architecture that could be expected in larger brains such as the human brain.

Multiscale integration of gene transcriptomic and neuroimaging data is becoming a widely used approach for exploring the molecular underpinnings of large-scale brain organization in health and disease. Proper statistical evaluation of determined associations between imaging-based phenotypic and transcriptomic data is key in these explorations, in particular to establish whether observed associations exceed "chance level" of random, nonspecific effects. Recent approaches have shown the importance of statistical models that can correct for spatial autocorrelation effects in the data to avoid inflation of reported statistics. Here, we discuss the need for examination of a second category of statistical models in transcriptomic-neuroimaging analyses, namely those that can provide "gene specificity." By means of a couple of simple examples of commonly performed transcriptomic-neuroimaging analyses, we illustrate some of the potentials and challenges of transcriptomic-imaging analyses, showing that providing gene specificity on observed transcriptomic-neuroimaging effects is of high importance to avoid reports of nonspecific effects. Through means of simulations we show that the rate of reported nonspecific effects (i.e., effects that cannot be specifically linked to a specific gene or gene-set) can run as high as 60%, with only less than 5% of transcriptomic-neuroimaging associations observed through ordinary linear regression analyses showing both spatial and gene specificity. We provide a discussion, a tutorial, and an easy-to-use toolbox for the different options of null models in transcriptomic-neuroimaging analyses.