Search

Rahul G Argula,1 Celine Ward,2 Carol Feghali-Bostwick2 1Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA; 2Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USACorrespondence: Rahul G ArgulaDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Medical University of South Carolina, 816 CSB, MSC 630, Jonathan Lucas Street, Charleston, SC 29425, USATel +1 843 792 3167Email argula@musc.eduAbstract: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare autoimmune disorder with multi-organ involvement. SSc-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (SSc-PAH) is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the SSc population. With advances in our understanding of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) diagnosis and treatment, outcomes for all PAH patients have significantly improved. While SSc-PAH patients have also benefited from these advances, significant challenges remain. Diagnosis of PAH is a challenging endeavor in SSc patients who often have many co-existing pulmonary and cardiac comorbidities. Given the significantly elevated prevalence and lifetime risk of PAH in the SSc population, screening for SSc-PAH is a critically useful strategy. Treatment with pulmonary arterial (PA) vasodilators has resulted in a dramatic improvement in the survival and quality of life of PAH patients. While therapy with PA vasodilators is beneficial in SSc-PAH patients, therapy effects appear to be attenuated when compared to responses in patients with idiopathic PAH (IPAH). This review attempts to chronicle and summarize the advances in our understanding of the optimal screening strategies to identify PAH in patients with SSc. The article also reviews the advances in the therapeutic and risk stratification strategies for SSc-PAH patients.Keywords: systemic sclerosis, pulmonary arterial hypertension, screening, risk stratification, therapy, advances

Rationale: Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) has been shown to result in benefits in moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) in patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease (f-ILD) receiving supplemental oxygen in two independent trials. Objective: This phase III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study sought to validate the benefit of ambulatory iNO in patients with f-ILD requiring supplemental oxygen. Methods: Patients with f-ILD receiving supplemental long-term oxygen were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to iNO at 45 μg/kg ideal body weight per hour or placebo for 16 weeks. The primary outcome was the change from baseline to Week 16 in MVPA assessed by accelerometry. Secondary outcomes included overall activity, 6-minute-walk distance and patient-reported outcomes. Results: 145 patients were enrolled; 75 were assigned to receive iNO and 70 placebo. The changes from baseline in MVPA at 16 weeks were -9.2 min/d (standard error, 3.51) in the iNO45 group and -3.7 min/d (3.76) in the placebo group (difference, 5.5; P  = 0.265). No statistically significant differences between the two treatment arms were found for any of the secondary outcomes. A subgroup analysis of patients with an intermediate or high probability of pulmonary hypertension on echocardiography did not demonstrate any benefit. The most common adverse events reported were respiratory tract infections, but the therapy was generally very well tolerated. Conclusions: There was no demonstrable benefit to iNO in patients with f-ILD receiving supplemental oxygen in daily physical activity assessed by actigraphy, a potential novel clinical trial endpoint. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03267108).

Background: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) accompanying COPD (PH-COPD) is associated with worse outcomes than COPD alone. There are currently no approved therapies to treat PH-COPD. The PERFECT study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03496623) evaluated the safety and efficacy of inhaled treprostinil (iTRE) in this patient population., Methods: Patients with PH-COPD (mean pulmonary arterial pressure ≥30 mmHg and pulmonary vascular resistance ≥4 WU) were enrolled in a multicentre, randomised (1:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week, crossover study. A contingent parallel design was also prespecified and implemented, based on a blinded interim analysis of missing data. Patients received treatment with iTRE up to 12 breaths (72 µg) 4 times daily or placebo. The primary efficacy end-point was change in peak 6-min walk distance (6MWD) at week 12., Results: In total, 76 patients were randomised, 64 in the original crossover design and 12 in the contingent parallel design; 66 patients received iTRE and 58 received placebo. The study was terminated early at the recommendation of the data and safety monitoring committee based on the totality of evidence that iTRE increased the risk of serious adverse events and suggestive evidence of an increased risk of mortality. The change in 6MWD was numerically worse with iTRE exposure than with placebo exposure., Conclusions: The risk-benefit observations associated with iTRE in patients with PH-COPD did not support continuation of the PERFECT study. The results of this study do not support iTRE as a viable treatment option in patients with PH-COPD., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: S.D. Nathan is a paid consultant for United Therapeutics. R.G. Argula reports advisory board consulting fees from United Therapeutics, Liquidia Inc., Merck Pharmaceuticals, Janssen and Accordant Health (CVS), and lecture honoraria from United Therapeutics, outside the submitted work. M.G. Trivieri reports advisory board participation with Janssen, outside the submitted work. B. Medarov reports lecture honoraria from Jensen Pharmaceuticals, outside the submitted work. A. Raina reports lecture honoraria from Merck and United Therapeutics, outside the submitted work. M.G. Risbano reports grants from Shadyside Foundation, royalties from Springer (Pulmonary Hypertension: Controversial and Emerging Topics), and advisory board participation with Gilead and Liquidia, outside the submitted work. T. Thenappan reports grants from United Therapeutics, Aerovate, Merck and Aria CV, and consulting fees from Merck and United Therapeutics, outside the submitted work. J.S. Soto reports grants, lecture honoraria, travel support and advisory board participation with GlaxoSmithKline and Genentech Pharmaceuticals, outside the submitted work. H. Bell, V. Lacasse, P. Sista, M. Di Marino, A. Smart, B. Hawkes and E. Nelson are employees of United Therapeutics, the PERFECT study sponsor. T. Bull reports grants from Bayer, Merck, Insmed and Aerovate, lecture honoraria from Merck, payment for expert testimony from Lung Biotechnology, travel support from Lung, advisory board participation with Keros, consultancy for United Therapeutics and a leadership role as PHA SLC chair, outside the submitted work. V. Tapson is a paid consultant for United Therapeutics. A. Waxman reports grants from Aria CV PI, AI Therapeutics and Acceleron/Merck, consultancy for United Therapeutics, and data and safety monitoring board participation with Insmed, outside the submitted work. The remaining authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright ©The authors 2024.)

Tyvaso DPI is a drug-device combination therapy comprised of a small, portable, reusable, breath-powered, dry powder inhaler (DPI) for the delivery of treprostinil. It is approved for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension and pulmonary hypertension associated with interstitial lung disease. Tyvaso DPI utilizes single-use prefilled cartridges to ensure proper dosing. Unlike nebulizer devices, administration of Tyvaso DPI is passive and does not require coordination with the device. The low-flow rate design results in targeted delivery to the peripheral lungs due to minimal drug loss from impaction in the oropharynx. The inert fumaryl diketopiperazine (FDKP) excipient forms microparticles that carry treprostinil into the airways, with a high fraction of the particles in the respirable range. In a clinical study in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, Tyvaso DPI had similar exposure and pharmacokinetics, low incidence of adverse events, and high patient satisfaction compared with nebulized treprostinil solution. Tyvaso DPI may be considered as a first prostacyclin agent or for those that do not tolerate other prostacyclin formulations, patients with pulmonary comorbidities, patients with mixed Group 1 and Group 3 pulmonary hypertension, or those that prefer an active lifestyle and need a portable, non-invasive treatment. Tyvaso DPI is a patient-preferred, maintenance-free, safe delivery option that may improve patient compliance and adherence., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest CM has received payment or honoraria from United Therapeutics and has participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board, for United Therapeutics, Merck, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals. RA is a member of an advisory board, has done disease state specific speaking engagements, and participates in clinical trials sponsored by United Therapeutics. SSa has received payments for speaking (promotional/non-promotional), consulting, and research from United Therapeutics, Liquidia Technologies, Gossamer Bio, Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline, and Janssen/Johnson and Johnson. CME has received payment or honoraria from United Therapeutics and has served on Advisory Boards for United Therapeutics. SSh is involved in research projects with United Therapeutics, Liquidia, Pharmousa, and Gossamer but receives no compensation for this work. CS is an employee of MannKind. CD, TW, BND, and MB are employees of United Therapeutics. CB has participated in multi-center interventional trials sponsored by United Therapeutics and is a consultant for INSMED, Gossamer Bio, and Janssen., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

To better understand the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the care of patients with pulmonary hypertension, we conducted a retrospective cohort study evaluating health insurance status, healthcare access, disease severity, and patient reported outcomes in this population. Using the Pulmonary Hypertension Association Registry (PHAR), we defined and extracted a longitudinal cohort of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients from the PHAR's inception in 2015 until March 2022. We used generalized estimating equations to model the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patient outcomes, adjusting for demographic confounders. We assessed whether insurance status modified these effects via covariate interactions. PAH patients were more likely to be on publicly-sponsored insurance during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with prior, and did not experience statistically significant delays in access to medications, increased emergency room visits or nights in the hospital, or worsening of mental health metrics. Patients on publicly-sponsored insurance had higher healthcare utilization and worse objective measures of disease severity compared with privately insured individuals irrespective of the COVID-19 pandemic. The relatively small impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pulmonary hypertension-related outcomes was unexpected but may be due to pre-established access to high quality care at pulmonary hypertension comprehensive care centers. Irrespective of the COVID-19 pandemic, patients who were on publicly-sponsored insurance seemed to do worse, consistent with prior studies highlighting outcomes in this population. We speculate that previously established care relationships may lessen the impact of an acute event, such as a pandemic, on patients with chronic illness., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (© 2023 The Authors. Pulmonary Circulation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute.)

Background: No therapies are currently approved for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension in patients with interstitial lung disease. The safety and efficacy of inhaled treprostinil for patients with this condition are unclear., Methods: We enrolled patients with interstitial lung disease and pulmonary hypertension (documented by right heart catheterization) in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 16-week trial. Patients were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive inhaled treprostinil, administered by means of an ultrasonic, pulsed-delivery nebulizer in up to 12 breaths (total, 72 μg) four times daily, or placebo. The primary efficacy end point was the difference between the two groups in the change in peak 6-minute walk distance from baseline to week 16. Secondary end points included the change in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level at week 16 and the time to clinical worsening., Results: A total of 326 patients underwent randomization, with 163 assigned to inhaled treprostinil and 163 to placebo. Baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups. At week 16, the least-squares mean difference between the treprostinil group and the placebo group in the change from baseline in the 6-minute walk distance was 31.12 m (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.85 to 45.39; P<0.001). There was a reduction of 15% in NT-proBNP levels from baseline with inhaled treprostinil as compared with an increase of 46% with placebo (treatment ratio, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.72; P<0.001). Clinical worsening occurred in 37 patients (22.7%) in the treprostinil group as compared with 54 patients (33.1%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.92; P = 0.04 by the log-rank test). The most frequently reported adverse events were cough, headache, dyspnea, dizziness, nausea, fatigue, and diarrhea., Conclusions: In patients with pulmonary hypertension due to interstitial lung disease, inhaled treprostinil improved exercise capacity from baseline, assessed with the use of a 6-minute walk test, as compared with placebo. (Funded by United Therapeutics; INCREASE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02630316.)., (Copyright © 2021 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Background: Rare genetic variants cause pulmonary arterial hypertension, but the contribution of common genetic variation to disease risk and natural history is poorly characterised. We tested for genome-wide association for pulmonary arterial hypertension in large international cohorts and assessed the contribution of associated regions to outcomes., Methods: We did two separate genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and a meta-analysis of pulmonary arterial hypertension. These GWAS used data from four international case-control studies across 11 744 individuals with European ancestry (including 2085 patients). One GWAS used genotypes from 5895 whole-genome sequences and the other GWAS used genotyping array data from an additional 5849 individuals. Cross-validation of loci reaching genome-wide significance was sought by meta-analysis. Conditional analysis corrected for the most significant variants at each locus was used to resolve signals for multiple associations. We functionally annotated associated variants and tested associations with duration of survival. All-cause mortality was the primary endpoint in survival analyses., Findings: A locus near SOX17 (rs10103692, odds ratio 1·80 [95% CI 1·55-2·08], p=5·13 × 10 -15 ) and a second locus in HLA-DPA1 and HLA-DPB1 (collectively referred to as HLA-DPA1/DPB1 here; rs2856830, 1·56 [1·42-1·71], p=7·65 × 10 -20 ) within the class II MHC region were associated with pulmonary arterial hypertension. The SOX17 locus had two independent signals associated with pulmonary arterial hypertension (rs13266183, 1·36 [1·25-1·48], p=1·69 × 10 -12 ; and rs10103692). Functional and epigenomic data indicate that the risk variants near SOX17 alter gene regulation via an enhancer active in endothelial cells. Pulmonary arterial hypertension risk variants determined haplotype-specific enhancer activity, and CRISPR-mediated inhibition of the enhancer reduced SOX17 expression. The HLA-DPA1/DPB1 rs2856830 genotype was strongly associated with survival. Median survival from diagnosis in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension with the C/C homozygous genotype was double (13·50 years [95% CI 12·07 to >13·50]) that of those with the T/T genotype (6·97 years [6·02-8·05]), despite similar baseline disease severity., Interpretation: This is the first study to report that common genetic variation at loci in an enhancer near SOX17 and in HLA-DPA1/DPB1 is associated with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Impairment of SOX17 function might be more common in pulmonary arterial hypertension than suggested by rare mutations in SOX17. Further studies are needed to confirm the association between HLA typing or rs2856830 genotyping and survival, and to determine whether HLA typing or rs2856830 genotyping improves risk stratification in clinical practice or trials., Funding: UK NIHR, BHF, UK MRC, Dinosaur Trust, NIH/NHLBI, ERS, EMBO, Wellcome Trust, EU, AHA, ACClinPharm, Netherlands CVRI, Dutch Heart Foundation, Dutch Federation of UMC, Netherlands OHRD and RNAS, German DFG, German BMBF, APH Paris, INSERM, Université Paris-Sud, and French ANR., (Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)