Search

BACKGROUND: Surgery for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) in older adults requires a careful balance of risk and benefit. We sought to analyze patient outcomes in the older individuals after pancreatic resection for IPMN. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database was performed for patients 65 years or older undergoing IPMN resection between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2017. Statistical analysis was performed based on age and Memorial Sloan Kettering Frailty Index (MSKFI) score. RESULTS: 148 patients underwent resection of an IPMN, including five patients who required two operations for recurrent disease. Median age at surgery was 74 (range, 65–90 years), and 52% were male. Most patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (53%) or distal pancreatectomy/splenectomy (35%). An associated adenocarcinoma was seen on pathology for 56 patients (37%). Median hospital length of stay was 7 days (range, 4–46 days). Grade 3 or higher post-operative complications on the Clavien-Dindo classification scale were seen in 20%. No patient died within 30-days. Patient outcomes were evaluated by age, split at age ≥ 75 (considered “elderly”), and separately by MSKFI score. No differences in post-operative morbidity or mortality was seen when stratified by age (65 – 74 vs > 75 years) or by MSKFI frailty score. CONCLUSION: Pancreatic resection can be safely performed in selected patients 65 years and older with low morbidity and mortality. More analysis is needed to determine if MSKFI score is a useful predictor of complications in older individuals.

BACKGROUND: Retrospective studies have shown the beneficial impact of geriatric comanagement (GERICO) on perioperative outcomes of older adults with cancer. We prospectively assessed the feasibility of perioperative GERICO for older adults with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy. METHODS: We conducted a pilot study wherein all patients 75 years and older undergoing radical cystectomy between October 2019 and November 2020 were referred to the Geriatric Service preoperatively. Feasibility was defined according to the percentage of patients who received preoperative evaluation by the Geriatrics Service, who were followed for more than 80% of their inpatient days and who had their surgery rescheduled for logistical reasons. Urology advanced practice provider (APP) satisfaction with the program was measured via an 11-item survey. RESULTS: Sixty-six eligible patients underwent radical cystectomy in the stated time frame; 59 (89%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 79–97%) were referred to the Geriatric Service for evaluation. The median age of patients who had geriatric comanagement was 79 years; 40 (68%) were male. Forty-one patients (69%) were visited on at least 80% of the days in which they were not in the intensive care unit. No surgeries were rescheduled for logistical reasons. Nine of the 12 urology APPs (75%) responded to the survey; all nine “somewhat” or “strongly” agreed with statements indicating satisfaction with the program. CONCLUSION: Despite the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, we showed that perioperative GERICO is feasible. Fully powered prospective randomized controlled trials should be conducted to assess GERICO’s impact on perioperative outcomes of older adults with cancer.

For patients with oligometastatic cancer, radiotherapy presents a promising avenue for achieving meaningful symptom relief and durable disease control. Data from recently published and ongoing randomized studies are helping to define the appropriate contexts for effective intervention with stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) in the oligometastatic setting. Importantly, older adults represent a significant portion of patients with oligometastatic disease, yet often comprise a minority of patients in clinical trials. Moreover, older adults of the same chronologic age may have variable degrees of fitness and frailty. In this review, we highlight the specific challenges and considerations for the use of radiotherapy for older adults with oligometastatic disease-noting the importance of geriatric assessments in clinical decision-making about the appropriateness of SABR and other metastasis-directed therapies in this population. We then review data from existing trials, including a subset analysis of adverse events and survival estimates among older adults enrolled in the landmark SABR-COMET trial. Finally, we discuss future directions for research, including the need for focused clinical trials in older adult cohorts. Ultimately, a multidisciplinary approach is critical when carefully balancing the potential risks and benefits of this emerging treatment paradigm in the older adult population.

Purpose Older adults with head and neck cancer have increased postoperative complications, longer hospital stays, and higher rates of mortality. Geriatric assessment (GA) provides a measure of overall health status and is preferable to using age alone for assessing fitness for surgery. We sought to determine whether a patient's frailty as determined by a novel electronic GA is associated with outcomes after head and neck cancer (HNC) surgery. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of 159 patients aged 75 and older referred to the Geriatrics Service at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center for pre-operative evaluation prior to undergoing HNC surgery. All patients completed the electronic Rapid Fitness Assessment (eRFA) within 60 days prior to surgery. The accumulated geriatric deficit (AGD) score includes twelve domains from the eRFA with a point assigned for each domain in which there is a deficit and a final point related to comorbidities. Three other metrics were individually assessed: age, Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), and number of comorbidities. We utilized multivariable linear regression and t-tests to determine whether frailty is associated with longer length of hospital stay, 30-day intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and 30-day and 90-day postoperative mortality. Results Patients with a higher AGD score spent more time in the hospital post-operatively (1.0 day increase per unit increase in AGD; 95% CI: 0.21–1.9; p = 0.015). Lower KPS was also associated with statistically significant longer length of stay (−2.70 day change per increasing index KPS; 95% CI: −4.30 – −1.00; days; p = 0.002), while age and comorbidity were not found to be statistically associated with length of stay. Higher AGD score remained significantly associated with longer length of stay on multivariable analysis (0.93 day increase per unit increase in AGD; 95% CI 0.15–1.71; p = 0.019). AGD was the only metric associated with increased risk of ICU admission (6.6 vs 5.0 geriatric deficits for those admitted vs not admitted to ICU; p = 0.024). Conclusions Frailty is associated with increased length of hospital stay and ICU admission in older adults with HNC undergoing surgery. GA can be used to counsel patients on the expected postoperative course.

PURPOSE This study determined whether an electronic version of the geriatric assessment is feasible in a multi-institutional, diverse setting. METHODs Ten sites within the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology participated. Patients who had active cancer or a history of cancer and were 65 years of age or older were eligible. The geriatric assessment was completed with an electronic data capture system that had been loaded onto iPads. Feasibility was defined a priori as completion in at least 70% of patients either with or without help. To enhance racial diversity, the original sample size was later changed and augmented by 50% with the intention of increasing enrollment of older minority patients. RESULTS A total of one hundred fifty-four patients were registered with a median age of 72 years (range, 65-91 years). Forty-three (28%) identified themselves as African American or Black. One hundred forty-one patients (92%) completed the electronic geriatric assessment. Feasibility was observed across all subgroups, regardless of race, education, performance status, comorbidities, and cognition; 124 patients (81%) completed the geriatric assessment without help. Reasons for not completing the geriatric assessment are as follows: clinic visit did not occur (n = 6), no iPad connection to the Internet (n = 3), patient declined (n = 2), prolonged hospitalization (n = 1), and patient died (n = 1). Reasons for needing help, as reported by study personnel, were as follows: the patient preferred that research personnel ask the questions (n = 9), vision problem (n = 3), lack of comfort with the iPad (n = 2), questions were not clear (n = 1), less proficient in English (n = 1), and challenge in pressing the green button to go to the next question (n = 1). CONCLUSION The electronic geriatric assessment is feasible in a multi-institutional setting that includes a notable proportion of African American or Black patients.

Rapid expansion of telemedicine is one of the transformative healthcare consequences of the COVID pandemic. As a result, telemedicine has allowed clinicians to address the needs of older adults with cancer, who faced the highest risks from COVID, while maintaining safety at home. In light of the COVID experience, which is an important source of learning, this article provides guidance on approaches to enhance telemedicine-enabled supportive care for the geriatric cancer patient.

Purpose Research on the impact of various intraoperative haemodynamic variables on the incidence of postoperative ICU admission among older patients with cancer is limited. In this study, the relationship between intraoperative haemodynamic status and postoperative intensive care unit admission among older patients with cancer is explored. Methods Patients aged ≥75 who underwent elective oncologic surgery lasting ≥120min were analysed. Chi-squared and t-tests were used to assess the associations between intraoperative variables with postoperative intensive care unit admission. Multivariable regressions were used to analyse potential predict risk factors for postoperative intensive care unit admission. Results Out of 994 patients, 48 (4.8%) were admitted to the intensive care unit within 30 days following surgery. Intensive care unit admission was associated with the presence of ≥4 comorbid conditions, intraoperative blood loss ≥100mL, and intraoperative tachycardia and hypertensive urgency. On multivariable analysis, operation time ≥240min (Odds Ratio [OR] = 2.29, p = 0.01), and each minute spent with intraoperative hypertensive urgency (OR = 1.06, p = 0.01) or tachycardia (OR = 1.01, p = 0.002) were associated with postoperative intensive care unit admission. Conclusion Intraoperative hypertensive urgency and tachycardia were associated with postoperative intensive care unit admission in older patients undergoing cancer surgery.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is often omitted in selected patients with advanced primary melanoma, although the justification/criteria for omission have been debated. We sought to determine whether assessment of frailty could serve as an objective marker to guide selection for SLNB in patients with advanced primary melanoma. Patients presenting with clinical stage IIC (ulcerated, > 4 mm Breslow thickness) cutaneous melanoma from January 1999 through June 2019 were included. Frailty was assessed using the Memorial Sloan Kettering Frailty Index (MSK FI), a composite score of functional status and medical comorbidities. Five-year melanoma-specific survival (MSS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Cox regression, and predictors of OS were identified using competing risk models. MSS did not differ between patients who did (n = 451) or did not undergo SLNB (n = 179) [63.2% vs. 65.0%, p = 0.14]; however, omission of SLNB was associated with decreased 5-year OS (29% vs. 44%, p

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the Memorial Sloan Kettering Frailty Index (MSK-FI) is associated with decision-making in older women surgically treated for advanced-stage ovarian cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively applied the MSK-FI to women ≥70 years with newly diagnosed advanced-stage ovarian cancer surgically treated at our institution from 01/2001–05/2017. MSK-FI components, including 10 comorbidities and functional assessment, were extracted from medical records. The MSK-FI ranges from 0–11, with higher scores indicating greater frailty. The primary outcome was the association between frailty and rate of primary debulking surgery (PDS), for which a multivariable logistic regression was used, adjusted for stage and histology. RESULTS: We identified 430 women treated with PDS (n=231, 54%) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy/interval debulking (n=199, 46%) with complete data. MSK-FI score distribution was: “0”, 95 patients (22%); “1”, 172 (40%); “2”, 89 (21%); and “3+”, 74 (17%). More-frail patients were less likely to have undergone PDS (OR for a unit increase of MSK-FI: 0.64; 95%CI, 0.53–0.77; p

Objectives: Care for older adults with cancer became more challenging during the COVID-19 pandemic. We sought to examine cancer care providers' attitudes toward the barriers and facilitators related to the care for these patients during the pandemic. Materials and Methods: Members of the Advocacy Committee of the Cancer and Aging Research Group, along with the Association of Community Cancer Centers, developed the survey distributed to multidisciplinary healthcare providers responsible for the direct care of patients with cancer. Participants were recruited by email sent through four professional organizations' listservs, email blasts, and messages through social media. Results: Complete data was available from 274 respondents. Only 15.4% had access to written guidelines that specifically address the management of older adults with cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic. Age was ranked fifth as the reason for postponing treatment following comorbid conditions, cancer stage, frailty, and performance status. Barriers to the transition to telehealth were found at the patient-, healthcare worker-, and institutional-levels. Providers reported increased barriers in accessing basic needs among older adults with cancer. Most respondents agreed (86.3%) that decision making about Do Not Resuscitate orders should be the result of discussion with the patient and the healthcare proxy in all situations. The top five concerns reported were related to patient safety, treatment delays, healthcare worker mental health and burnout, and personal safety for family and self. Conclusion: These findings demand resources and support allocation for older adults with cancer and healthcare providers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Care for older adults with cancer became more challenging during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in urban hotspots. This study examined the potential differences in healthcare providers' provision of as well as barriers to cancer care for older adults with cancer between urban and suburban/rural settings.Members of the Advocacy Committee of the Cancer and Aging Research Group, with the Association of Community Cancer Centers, surveyed multidisciplinary healthcare providers responsible for the direct care of patients with cancer. Respondents were recruited through organizational listservs, email blasts, and social media messages. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were used.Complete data was available from 271 respondents (urban (n = 144), suburban/rural (n = 127)). Most respondents were social workers (42, 44%) or medical doctors/advanced practice providers (34, 13%) in urban and suburban/rural settings, respectively. Twenty-four percent and 32.4% of urban-based providers reported "strongly considering" treatment delays among adults aged 76-85 and 85, respectively, compared to 13% and 15.4% of suburban/rural providers (Ps = 0.048, 0.013). More urban-based providers reported they were inclined to prioritize treatment for younger adults over older adults than suburban/rural providers (10.4% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.04) during the pandemic. The top concerns reported were similar between the groups and related to patient safety, treatment delays, personal safety, and healthcare provider mental health.These findings demonstrate location-based differences in providers' attitudes regarding care provision for older adults with cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Treatment patterns for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) vary among older adults because of concerns about their health status. Geriatric assessment may guide treatment for older adults with HNSCC by assessing their health status.We conducted a retrospective review of adjuvant treatment received by older patients with HNSCC who completed a novel geriatric assessment, the electronic Rapid Fitness Assessment, before treatment. The electronic Rapid Fitness Assessment yields an accumulated geriatric deficits (AGD) score. Higher AGD score indicates greater frailty. Comparators were age and performance status. The Wilcoxon rank sum test compared differences between those who did and did not receive adjuvant radiation therapy and chemotherapy.The cohort included 73 patients, of whom 56 (77%) had oral cavity cancer. The most common geriatric deficits were major distress, social activity limitation, depression, and impaired activities of daily living. AGD score, age, and performance status were not associated with receipt of adjuvant radiation. Patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy had a significantly lower median AGD score than those who did not (3 vs 6;Receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with frailty. Rates of chemotherapy utilization were very low, indicating the need for novel strategies to mitigate the toxicity burden in this patient population. Receipt of adjuvant radiation therapy was not associated with frailty; however, there was a trend toward lower frailty among those who did receive radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: Frailty is associated with adverse outcomes following radical cystectomy. Prospective tools to identify factors affecting outcomes are needed. We describe a novel electronic rapid fitness assessment to evaluate geriatric patients undergoing radical cystectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prior to undergoing radical cystectomy between February 2015 and February 2018, 80 patients over the age of 75 completed the electronic rapid fitness assessment and were perioperatively comanaged by the Geriatrics Service. Physical and cognitive function over 12 domains were evaluated and an accumulated geriatric deficit score compiled. Hospital length of stay, discharge disposition, unplanned intensive care unit admissions, urgent care visits, readmissions, complications, and deaths were assessed. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients who underwent radical cystectomy for bladder cancer without concomitant procedures completed the assessment. Median age was 80 (77, 84), and 52 (80%) were male. A higher proportion of patients with intensive care unit admission, urgent care visit, and major complications had impairments identified within electronic rapid fitness assessment domains, including Timed Up and Go. Readmission rates were similar between patients with or without deficits identified. Higher accumulated geriatric deficit score was significantly associated with intensive care unit admission (p=0.035), death within 90 days (p=0.037), and discharge to other than home (p=0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated the feasibility of assessing fitness in patients over 75 undergoing radical cystectomy using a novel electronic fitness tool. Physical limitations and overall impairment corresponded to higher intensive care unit admission rates and adverse postoperative outcomes. Larger studies in less resourced environments are required to validate these findings.

The incidence of most cancers increase with increasing age. Cancer is the second most common cause of death in older adults after cardiovascular disease. Many common cancers in older adults can be prevented from occurring or can be identified at an early stage and be effectively treated. Though cancer is feared primarily because of premature mortality, for many older adults, preventing and identifying cancer in its early stages, in an attempt to reduce discomfort and disability associated with advanced cancer and cancer treatment, is also a priority. Overscreening for cancer in older adults, can lead to unnecessary diagnostic testing and unnecessary treatment. Both older adults and their healthcare providers need guidance on the appropriate use of cancer prevention and screening interventions. This is Part 2 of a two part clinical review on cancer prevention and screening for adults, 65 years of age and older. Guidance is provided regarding the prevention and early identification of breast, prostate, cervical, ovarian and endometrial cancer. The prevention of lung, colorectal, bladder and kidney cancer were addressed in Part 1.

The number of older adults with cancer is increasing. Over the past 3 decades, geriatric oncology research has focused on improving the assessment of frailty and fitness of older adults with cancer as well as methods of improving their outcomes. At the same time, advances in digital health technologies have opened new frontiers for reaching this goal. Digital health technologies encompass a variety of solutions, from electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) to big data and wireless sensors. These solutions have the potential to further advance our understanding of patients’ experiences during cancer treatment. Whereas the data on the feasibility and utility of such solutions in the care of older adults with cancer are limited, interest from digital health oncology researchers to further explore the benefits of these products is increasing. In this article, we describe the focus of geriatric oncology, the rationale behind the need to explore digital health technologies in this setting, and emerging data and ongoing studies, as well as provide guidelines for proper selection, implementation, and testing of digital health solutions in the context of geriatric oncology.

Objectives The goal of this study was to evaluate the relationship between social support (SS) and grade 3–5 chemotherapy-related toxicities among older adults with cancer. Methods This is a secondary analysis of a prospective longitudinal study of patients aged 65+ with solid cancer which led to the development of a predictive model for grade 3–5 chemotherapy-related toxicity (the Cancer and Aging Research Group [CARG] Chemotherapy Toxicity Risk Score). SS was measured by a modified version of Medical-Outcome Study-Social Support Survey and grade 3–5 hematological and non-hematological toxicities were captured and graded using CTCAE version 3.0. Patients were categorized into those with poor (SS score ≤ 75) and good SS (score of 76–100). Multivariate polychotomous logistic regression was used to examine the associations between SS and chemotherapy-related toxicity with adjustment for the CARG Toxicity Risk Score. Results Compared to patients with good SS, those with poor SS were less likely to have grade 3–5 toxicity, especially for non-hematological toxicity (adjusted OR = 0.52, p = .02). Patients who did not have someone to take them to the doctor “most” or “all of the time” were less likely to have grade 3–5 non-hematological toxicity compared to patients who had someone to take them to the doctor most or all of the time (adjusted OR = 0.32, p = .02). Conclusion Our study showed that patients with poor SS, especially those with less availability of someone to take them to doctors were less likely to have a documented grade 3–5 non-hematological toxicity.

Older age is associated with poorer outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection, although the heterogeneity of ageing results in some older adults being at greater risk than others. The objective of this study was to quantify the association of a novel geriatric risk index, comprising age, modified Charlson comorbidity index, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, with COVID-19 severity and 30-day mortality among older adults with cancer.In this cohort study, we enrolled patients aged 60 years and older with a current or previous cancer diagnosis (excluding those with non-invasive cancers and premalignant or non-malignant conditions) and a current or previous laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis who reported to the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) multinational, multicentre, registry between March 17, 2020, and June 6, 2021. Patients were also excluded for unknown age, missing data resulting in unknown geriatric risk measure, inadequate data quality, or incomplete follow-up resulting in unknown COVID-19 severity. The exposure of interest was the CCC19 geriatric risk index. The primary outcome was COVID-19 severity and the secondary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality; both were assessed in the full dataset. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were estimated from ordinal and binary logistic regression models.5671 patients with cancer and COVID-19 were included in the analysis. Median follow-up time was 56 days (IQR 22-120), and median age was 72 years (IQR 66-79). The CCC19 geriatric risk index identified 2365 (41·7%) patients as standard risk, 2217 (39·1%) patients as intermediate risk, and 1089 (19·2%) as high risk. 36 (0·6%) patients were excluded due to non-calculable geriatric risk index. Compared with standard-risk patients, high-risk patients had significantly higher COVID-19 severity (adjusted OR 7·24; 95% CI 6·20-8·45). 920 (16·2%) of 5671 patients died within 30 days of a COVID-19 diagnosis, including 161 (6·8%) of 2365 standard-risk patients, 409 (18·5%) of 2217 intermediate-risk patients, and 350 (32·1%) of 1089 high-risk patients. High-risk patients had higher adjusted odds of 30-day mortality (adjusted OR 10·7; 95% CI 8·54-13·5) than standard-risk patients.The CCC19 geriatric risk index was strongly associated with COVID-19 severity and 30-day mortality. Our CCC19 geriatric risk index, based on readily available clinical factors, might provide clinicians with an easy-to-use risk stratification method to identify older adults most at risk for severe COVID-19 as well as mortality.US National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute Cancer Center.

BACKGROUND: Hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to oxaliplatin present a therapeutic challenge. The standard desensitization protocol consists of 12 infusion steps with three drug dilutions, often in an inpatient setting. Several years ago we implemented a simplified outpatient graded infusion protocol for oxaliplatin with two drug dilutions and three infusion steps. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of our experience to define the safety and outcomes associated with this simplified, ambulatory, graded infusion strategy. RESULTS: Between 1/1/2011 and 12/1/2020, 374 patients who had experienced an oxaliplatin-related HSR were treated via a 3-step graded infusion in the outpatient setting. Of these 374 patients, 283 (76%) did not experience a subsequent HSR, while 91 (24%) did experience a breakthrough HSR. Of the 374 patients, 19 (5%) experienced a grade 3 or 4 HSR. Three patients (0.8%) were hospitalized. There were no grade 5 (fatal) HSRs. Overall, the 374 patients received a median additional 3 cycles of oxaliplatin (range 1 – 41). The most common reasons for treatment discontinuation were disease progression (35%), breakthrough HSRs (24%), completion of treatment (21%) and toxicity other than HSR (20%). Fifteen patients who experienced breakthrough HSRs during a graded infusion were subsequently treated with the standard 12-step desensitization. Five of these 15 patients had an HSR during their initial desensitization and 5 developed an HSR on subsequent 12-step desensitizations. Thus, treatment was discontinued in 67% of these 15 patients due to persistent HSRs. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that the simplified 3-step graded infusion protocol is a safe outpatient strategy for patients with a history of HSR to oxaliplatin.

Geriatric assessment (GA) provides information on key health domains of older adults and is recommended to help inform cancer treatment decisions and cancer care. However, GA is not feasible in many health institutions due to lack of geriatric staff and/or resources. To increase accessibility to GA and improve treatment decision making for older adults with cancer (≥65 years), we developed a self-reported, electronic geriatric assessment tool: Comprehensive Assessment for My Plan (CHAMP).Older adults with cancer were invited to join user-centered design sessions to develop the layout and content of the tool. Subsequently, they participated in usability testing to test the usability of the tool (ease of use, acceptability, etc.). Design sessions were also conducted with oncology clinicians (oncologists and nurses) to develop the tool's clinician interface. GA assessment questions and GA recommendations were guided by a systematic review and Delphi expert panel.A total of seventeen older adults participated in the study. Participants were mainly males (82.4%) and 75% were aged 75 years and older. Nine oncology clinicians participated in design sessions. Older adults and clinicians agreed that the tool was user-friendly. Domains in the final CHAMP tool (with questions and recommendations) included functional status, falls risk, cognitive impairment, nutrition, medication review, social supports, depression, substance use disorder, and miscellaneous items.CHAMP was designed for use by older adults and oncologists and may enhance access to GA for older adults with cancer. The next phase of the CHAMP study will involve field validation in oncology clinics.

Introduction Geriatric medical comanagement of older surgical patients with cancer is associated with lower 90-day postoperative mortality. Here, we investigate the hypothesis that this association varies on the basis of the degree of a patient's frailty. Methods Frailty was assessed using the Memorial Sloan Kettering Frailty Index. Our hypothesis was evaluated using two approaches, both adjusted for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status, preoperative albumin, operating room duration, and estimated blood loss. A logistic regression was performed with 90-day mortality as the outcome and geriatric comanagement, continuous Memorial Sloan Kettering Frailty Index, and an interaction term between these two variables as the primary predictors. We then categorized frailty into four levels and, within each level, performed logistic regression with geriatric comanagement as the primary predictor and 90-day mortality as the outcome. Finally, we extracted the effect size and used a meta-analytic approach to test for heterogeneity. Results Of 1687 patients aged ≥75 years who underwent elective cancer surgery with a length of stay of ≥1 day, 931 (55%) received comanagement; 31 patients (3.3%) who received comanagement died within 90 days, compared with 72 (9.5%) who did not. Ninety-day mortality was not statistically significantly different by degree of frailty in either analysis (interaction P = 0.4; test of heterogeneity P = 0.8). Conclusion Geriatric comanagement is valuable for all older surgical patients, not just the frail, and should be provided to as large a portion of the older surgical population as possible. Further research should examine predictors of response to geriatric comanagement.

Older patients are at increased risk for complications and death following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Traditional transplant-specific prognostic indices such as hematopoietic cell transplant comorbidity index (HCT-CI) may not capture all underlying geriatric vulnerabilities, and in-depth evaluation by a geriatrician prior to transplant may not always be available. We hypothesize that routine pre-transplant interdisciplinary clinical assessment may uncover prognostically important geriatric deficits. Using an institutional database of 457 adults aged 60 years and older who underwent first allo-HCT for hematological malignancies from 2010 to 2017, we examined the prognostic impact of pre-transplant deficits in geriatric domains of function, mobility, mood, medication, nutrition, and relevant biochemical markers. We found that impairment in instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) was associated with reduced survival through increased non-relapse mortality (NRM, HR = 1.82; 95% CI, 1.04-3.19). The combination of IADL impairment with either HCT-CI/age index or disease risk index readily stratified NRM and overall survival, respectively. In addition, we found that even mild renal dysfunction adversely impacted survival in older transplant patients. Our findings establish important geriatric vulnerabilities in older patients prior to allo-HCT and may provide an entry point for prospective, interventional trials to improve their outcomes.

62 Background: The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) improves the outcomes of older patients with cancer, and by identifying of geriatric impairments the CGA can guide the development of supportive interventions. However, the implementation of these interventions in a real-world setting can be burdensome for patients, particularly when additional visits are required in an often frail population. Therefore, our team developed a collaborative model for home-based delivery of CGA-guided interventions. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of community-dwelling patients aged ≥ 70 years with an active cancer diagnosis who were deemed to be frail by a CGA and who received home-based CGA-guided supportive interventions under a collaborative care model established by the geriatric oncology and the palliative home care teams at Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute between October 2020 and April 2022. The collaboration is based on multidisciplinary discussion of the CGA results / interventions and weekly rounds to discuss patient’s progress and emerging needs. Results: A total of 182 patients received a CGA during the study period, 54% (n = 99) were determined to be frail based on impairment in ≥ 7 geriatric domains. Among all eligible patients, 19 patients (19%) were included in the collaborative model. The median age of enrolled patients was 84 years (74-90), 12/19 (63%) had metastatic cancer, 7/19 (37%) received systemic treatment, and 8/19 (42%) received radiation. The average number of geriatric impairments per patients was 9.5 (7-12). Geriatric impairments addressed at home were skilled nursing (19/19), physical therapy (18/19), occupational therapy (12/19), speech-language-pathology (2/19), nutrition (5/19), or social worker (11/19) support at home. The average number of unplanned hospitalizations was 1.16 per patient (range 0-4), and the average unplanned emergency room visit was 0.89 per person (range 0-4) during study time. Transition to hospice occurred in 8/19 patients (42%), the median time to transition to hospice was 33.5 days (15-167). Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility of a collaborative model for home-based geriatric oncology care in a real-world setting to help reduce the burden of care on patients and ensure patient-centered delivery of CGA-guided interventions. Findings underscore the need for future work to evaluate the impact of this novel geriatric oncology care model on patient outcomes.

Background Advanced age and multiple comorbidities have been established as a risk factor for more severe disease and increased mortality among patients with COVID-19, yet the impact of frailty in patients with cancer 75 years and older who are admitted, remains unclear. Methods To better understand the clinical presentation and course of illness for this population, we conducted a chart review of patients with cancer age 75 and older who were admitted to a comprehensive cancer center within 72 h of a confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis over a three-month period (March 1, 2020-May 31, 2020). Frequency and proportion of characteristics were reported. We additionally assessed the association between frailty and 30-day mortality using univariable logistic regression. Results Our cohort consisted of 70 patients. We found evidence that increased frailty based on MSK-FI was associated with increased risk of 30-day mortality (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.00, 1.87; p-value = 0.051), though this did not meet conventional levels of significance. Conclusion Our analysis showed evidence of some association between degree of frailty and 30-day survival among older patients with cancer aged ≥75 who were admitted with COVID-19 infection. This finding illustrates the importance of frailty screening in the care management of older patients with cancer and COVID-19.

Objectives Care for older adults with cancer became more challenging during the COVID-19 pandemic. We sought to examine healthcare providers' clinical barriers, patient questions, and overall experiences related to care delivery for these patients during the pandemic. Materials and methods Members of the Advocacy Committee of the Cancer and Aging Research Group along with the Association of Community Cancer Centers developed a 20-question survey for healthcare providers of older adults with cancer. Eligible participants were recruited by email sent through professional organizations' listservs, email blasts, and social media. This manuscript reports the qualitative data from the survey's three open-ended questions. Free text, open-ended survey items were analyzed by two independent coders for identification of common themes using NVivo software. Theme agreement was reached through consensus and count comparisons of participant responses were made. Results Healthcare system organizational challenges and meeting basic needs and support were commonly reported themes among respondents (n = 274). Barriers to care delivery included organizational challenges, patients' access to resources and support, concerns for patients' mental and physical health, and telehealth challenges. Respondents reported older adults were asking about their health and cancer care as well as access to basic needs and supports. Providers described worrying about patients' mental health, fear of personal safety, frustration in multi-level institutions, as well as experiencing positive leadership and communication. Conclusion Providers are faced with balancing their concerns for personal and patient safety. These findings demand resources and support allocation for older adults with cancer and healthcare providers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

e24023 Background: Presence and severity of comorbid conditions impact surgical outcomes of older adults with cancer. The aim of our study is to evaluate the relationship between diabetes mellitus (DM), and preoperative HgbA1c (pHgbA1c) with frailty and adverse surgical outcomes among older adults with cancer. Methods: Retrospective study of patients aged 65 and older who underwent elective cancer surgery with at least one-day hospital stay in 2015-18 at our institution. For our primary aim, we assessed the association between DM and frailty, sociodemographic and clinical characteristics by reporting the characteristics stratified by presence of DM. Frailty was assessed using the Memorial Sloan Kettering Frailty Index (MSK-FI), which composes of 10 comorbidities and one functional component. This score ranges from 0-11, with higher score corresponding to greater frailty. Our secondary aim to assess the association between pHgbA1c and frailty was evaluated by a linear regression with pHgbA1c as the outcome and MSK-FI as the predictor. For our tertiary aim to assess the association between pHgbA1c and adverse surgical outcomes, we used a univariable logistic regression model with the outcome as the composite definition of 30-day readmission, 30-day emergency room visit, 30-day major complication, or 90-day mortality, and pHgbA1c as the predictor. We also used a multivariable logistics regression model, adjusting for age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologist Performance Status (ASA-PS), and operation time.Analyses related to pHgbA1c excluded patients without pHgbA1c records. Results: Among 4417 patients, 1024 (23%) had DM and among those 403 (39%) had pHgbA1c values recorded. The results showed patients with DM were older, had higher ASA-PS, more comorbidities and higher MSK-FI scores than those without DM. Moreover, pHgbA1c was not found to be statistically associated with degree of frailty (β for one unit change in MSK-FI 0.11, 95% CI 0.00, 0.21; p = 0.057). Lastly, in both unadjusted and adjusted models pHgbA1c was not associated with adverse surgical outcomes (OR for both models, 0.99, 95% CI 0.83, 1.16, p = 0.9). Conclusions: In this cohort of patients whose pHgbA1c values were recorded, pHgbA1c was not associated with adverse surgical outcomes. Further studies are needed to confirm this study with more focus on perioperative care process of patients with DM and find cohorts whose pHgbA1c measurements can better predict frailty and adverse surgical outcomes.

e24014 Background: The stress from oncologic surgeries for older adults may lead to poor surgical outcomes. In this study, we aim to develop a MSK Surgery Stress Score to measure the complexity of surgery for these patients. The score could then be used for future analyses using datasets where patients undergoing a variety of procedures. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of adults aged 75 and older who underwent elective cancer surgery in our institution with hospital length of stay of at least one day in 2015 to 2020. Based on surgery stress score developed by Haga et al., we explored various models including at least one or some of these variables as linear or non-linear terms: operation time, weight (kg), blood loss (cc), type of surgery, body mass index, and incision score. The primary outcome of interest evaluated was defined as the composite outcome of death within 90-day of surgery, readmission or emergency room visit or major complications (grade 3-5) within 30 days of surgery. We additionally explored models for a secondary outcome, where minor complications (grade 1-2) were included in the definition, and lastly, we looked at major complications alone as a tertiary outcome. For each of the model and outcomes, we used a logistic regression. We then used the logit transformation of the predicted probability to represent the proposed surgery stress score. Using this score, we evaluated the area under the curve (AUC) for each outcome. Results: In total, 1573 patients were included in the study. The median age was 80 (quartiles 77, 83) and just under half (49%) were male. The median (quartile) operation time was 181 minutes (115, 259), weight was 71 kg (62, 84), blood loss was 100 mL (50, 300), and just over (51%) of patient underwent an abdominopelvic procedure. The rate of 90-day mortality was 3.8%, while the rate of 30-day major complication, readmission and emergency room visit was 7.4%, 10% and 13%, respectively Furthermore, 21%, and 35% experienced primary, and secondary outcomes, respectively. Overall, 18 predictive models for each of the outcomes were developed and assessed. AUC for our different models ranged from 0.59 to 0.73 for the different definitions of our outcomes. Among the various models, the one defined using whether patients underwent an abdominopelvic procedure, incision score, operation time, weight, and blood loss (the latter two both included as non-linear terms) appeared to the front runner. Conclusions: We explored potential models to be used as the MSK Surgery Stress Score. Currently the model is being optimized by additional work. Following optimization of the model, future studies should validate this score in other cohorts of older surgical patients with cancer.

e24022 Background: With expansion of web-based geriatric assessment (GA), the aim of our study is to assess whether patients’ independency and time to complete electronic Rapid Fitness Assessment (eRFA), a web-based GA at our institution, is associated with frailty. Methods: Retrospective study of 3456 patients with cancer who underwent cancer surgery in 2015-2020 with hospital length of stay of 1+ days and completed the eRFA prior to surgery. Frailty was assessed by two methods: Memorial Sloan Kettering Frailty Index (MSK-FI, score 0-11) and accumulative geriatric deficits (AGD, score 0-13). In both measures, higher score is reflective of higher degree of frailty. Patient’s independency to complete the eRFA was self-reported (no help, some help, someone else). Time to complete the eRFA was captured by the system based on survey start time and submission time. Association between characteristics and patient’s independency to complete the eRFA were assessed using Kruskal Wallis test for continuous variable and Chi-square test for categorical variables. Analysis into time to complete the eRFA excluded surveys completed by someone else (n = 407), those completed in < 2 min (n = 1) or > 40 min (n = 82). Association between time to complete the eRFA and frailty was assessed using two separate linear regression models with frailty—MSK-FI and AGD, separately—as the outcome, and minutes to complete the eRFA as the predictor, in surveys completed with no help and some help, separately. Time to complete the eRFA was included in the model as a non-linear term with restricted cubic splines with knots at the tertiles. Results: Among our cohort, the median age at the time of survey completion was 78 (quartiles 75, 82), just under half (49%) of patients were male. Survey completion corresponded to 58% with no help, 30% with some help, and 12% by someone else. Independency in completing the eRFA was associated with younger age (median ages: no help 77, some help 80, someone else 80), and lower frailty (median AGD: no help 4, some help 6, someone else 8; median MSK-FI: no help 2, some help 3, someone else 3) (all p < 0.001). Longer time to complete the eRFA was associated with higher degree of frailty measured by MSK-FI and AGD (all non-linear association p < 0.001). For example, for surveys completed with no help in 5, 10, and 15 minutes, the estimated MSK-FI is 1.4 (95% CI 1.3, 1.6); 2.3 (95% CI 2.2, 2.4); and 2.3 (95% CI 2.1, 2.6), and the estimated AGD is 3.1 (95% CI 2.9, 3.3); 5.1 (95% CI 4.9, 5.4), and 5.1 (95% CI 4.7, 5.5). Conclusions: Patients who needed assistance or took a longer time to complete the assessment were more likely to have a higher degree of frailty. To avoid burdening the hospital, placing undue stress on patients, and possibly inaccurate responses, we should test solutions that may enhance the ability of frail patients to complete the eRFA faster and without assistance from others, such as by using voice assistants.

Key Points Question Is collaboration between geriatricians and surgeons in the perioperative care of older patients with cancer associated with postoperative outcomes? Findings In this cohort study including 1892 patients aged 75 years and older, the adjusted probability of death within 90 days after surgery was 4.3% for patients who received geriatric comanagement of care, compared with 8.9% for patients who received care management from the surgical service only. Meaning These findings suggest that when feasible, older patients undergoing surgical treatment for cancer should receive geriatric care comanagement as part of their perioperative care., This cohort study examines outcomes associated with geriatric comanaged perioperative care vs care managed by the surgery team alone among patients aged 75 years and older with cancer., Importance Collaboration between geriatricians and surgeons in the perioperative treatment of older patients has been associated with improved outcomes in several nononcologic specialties. Similar associations may be possible among older patients with cancer. Objective To investigate the associations of geriatric comanagement of care for older patients undergoing cancer-related surgical treatment with 90-day postoperative mortality, rate of adverse surgical events, and postoperative use of inpatient supportive care services. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study assessed outcomes of patients who received geriatric comanaged care vs those who did not using multivariable logistic regression analysis, with 90-day mortality as the outcome and geriatric comanagement of care as the main variable, with adjustment for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiology score, Memorial Sloan Kettering Frailty Index score, preoperative albumin level, operative time, and estimated blood loss. A similar model was used to assess the association of geriatric comanagement with adverse surgical events, defined as any major complication, readmission, or emergency department visit within 30 days. Patients aged 75 years and older who underwent an elective surgical procedure with a hospital stay of at least 1 day at a single tertiary-care cancer center between February 2015 and February 2018 were included. Data were analyzed from January to July 2019. Exposures Postoperative care comanaged by the geriatrics service and surgical service (geriatric comanagement group) vs by the surgical service only (surgical service group). Main Outcomes and Measures 90-day mortality, adverse surgical events, and use of supportive care services. Results Of 1892 patients included, 1020 (53.9%) received geriatric comanagement of care; these patients, compared with those who received care managed by the surgery service only, were older (mean [SD] age, 81 [4] years vs 80 [4] years; P

Background The number of older patients with gastrointestinal cancer is increasing due to an aging global population. Minimizing reliance on an in-clinic patient performance status test to determine a patient’s prognosis and course of treatment can improve resource utilization. Further, current performance status measurements cannot capture patients' constant changes. These measurements also rely on self-reports, which are subjective and subject to bias. Real-time monitoring of patients' activities may allow for a more accurate assessment of patients’ performance status while minimizing resource utilization. Objective This study investigates the validity of consumer-based activity trackers for monitoring the performance status of patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Methods A total of 27 consenting patients (63% male, median age 58 years) wore a consumer-based activity tracker 7 days before chemotherapy and 14 days after receiving their first treatment. The provider assessed patients using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) scale and Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale-Short Form (MSAS-SF) before and after chemotherapy visits. The statistical correlations between ECOG-PS and MSAS-SF scores and patients’ daily step counts were assessed. Results The daily step counts yielded the highest correlation with the patients' ECOG-PS scores after chemotherapy (P Conclusions This study demonstrates the feasibility of using inexpensive, consumer-based activity trackers for the remote monitoring of performance status in the gastrointestinal cancer population. The findings need to be validated in a larger population for generalizability.

BACKGROUND The number of older patients with gastrointestinal cancer is increasing due to an aging global population. Minimizing reliance on an in-clinic patient performance status test to determine a patient’s prognosis and course of treatment can improve resource utilization. Further, current performance status measurements cannot capture patients' constant changes. These measurements also rely on self-reports, which are subjective and subject to bias. Real-time monitoring of patients' activities may allow for a more accurate assessment of patients’ performance status while minimizing resource utilization. OBJECTIVE This study investigates the validity of consumer-based activity trackers for monitoring the performance status of patients with gastrointestinal cancer. METHODS A total of 27 consenting patients (63% male, median age 58 years) wore a consumer-based activity tracker 7 days before chemotherapy and 14 days after receiving their first treatment. The provider assessed patients using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) scale and Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale-Short Form (MSAS-SF) before and after chemotherapy visits. The statistical correlations between ECOG-PS and MSAS-SF scores and patients’ daily step counts were assessed. RESULTS The daily step counts yielded the highest correlation with the patients' ECOG-PS scores after chemotherapy (P CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the feasibility of using inexpensive, consumer-based activity trackers for the remote monitoring of performance status in the gastrointestinal cancer population. The findings need to be validated in a larger population for generalizability.