Search

Electrochemotherapy (ECT) is a minimally invasive and safe treatment gaining positive and long-lasting antitumoral results that are receiving the attention of the scientific community. It is a local treatment that combines the use of electroporation and the administration of cytotoxic drugs to induce cell death in the target tissue. ECT is largely used for the treatment of cutaneous and subcutaneous lesions, and good results have been reported for the treatment of deep visceral tumors. The latest literature review is provided. Moreover, in line with its development for the treatment of visceral tumors in this article, we describe a novel approach of ECT: endoscopic treatment of colorectal cancer. Endoscopic ECT application was combined with systemic chemotherapy in the treatment of obstructing rectal cancer without prospective surgery. A good response after ECT was described: concentric involvement of the rectum was reduced, and no stenosing lesions were detected.

Background: There is ongoing discussion around the optimal course of treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) following the second line. Trifluridine/tipiracil (T) and regorafenib (R) have been the mainstay of therapy in this situation, as they both increased overall survival (OS) in comparison to a placebo. Despite the paucity of evidence, therapy rechallenge is also recognized as an option for practical use. In the third-line scenario of mCRC, we planned to investigate the survival outcomes using (T) and (R), both with and without prior rechallenge treatment. Materials and methods: Between 2012 and 2023, we examined the medical records of 1156 patients with refractory mCRC who were enrolled in the multicenter retrospective ReTrITA study. We then separated the patients into two cohorts based on the rechallenge therapy that was given before regorafenib and/or trifluridine/tipiracil at 17 Italian centres. Results: A total of 981 patients underwent T and/or R therapy, while 175 patients had therapy rechallenge before T and/or R. The median overall survival (mOS) for patients treated with T/R and R/T sequences in the rechallenge therapy cohort was 14.5 months and 17.6 months, respectively (p = 0.1955). A statistically significant survival benefit was observed in patients who received monotheraphy with R (mOS: 6 months) compared to the T group (mOS: 4.2 months) (p = 0.0332). In the same cohort, a median progression-free survival (mPFS) benefit was demonstrated in favour of the R/T group (11.3 months) vs. 9 months of the reverse sequence (p = 0.4004). In the no-rechallenge cohort, the mOS was statistically longer in the R/T sequence than in the T/R sequence (16.2 months vs. 12.3 months, respectively; p = 0.0014). In terms of the mPFS, we saw the same significant result for the adoption of R/T treatment (11.5 months vs. 8.4 months, respectively; p < 0.0001). The two monotherapy groups did not reveal any significant differences. Conclusions: This study suggests that rechallenge therapy may improve survival rates in the third-line treatment of mCRC, particularly if it is administered before sequential R/T treatment. This could allow for the extension of mCRC treatment choices until prospective studies are finished or randomised trials are performed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Carcinoid syndrome in patients with neuroendocrine tumors is a challenging condition that requires accurate diagnostic and therapeutic management by a multidisciplinary team. Therefore, this review intends to detail all clinical aspects of carcinoid syndrome in order to provide clinicians with a definite overview of the effective approach to carcinoid syndrome. In this way, the review aims to improve patient care and treatment outcomes in this patient population. Carcinoid syndrome (CS) is a rare condition associated with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), particularly those originating in the gastrointestinal tract, which secrete bioactive substances like serotonin. The management of CS requires a multidisciplinary approach due to its complex clinical manifestations, including flushing, diarrhea, bronchospasm, and carcinoid heart disease. Optimal care involves collaboration between several professional figures like oncologists, endocrinologists, gastroenterologists, surgeons, and dietitians. Currently, a wide range of treatments are available, focused on both symptom control and tumor burden reduction. Somatostatin analogs (SSAs) are the first-line therapy for symptom relief. Still, in patients with progressive disease or refractory CS, other options include targeted therapies, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), liver-directed therapies, and surgical resection, when feasible. Furthermore, management of complications related to prolonged serotonin release and malnutrition as a result of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, post-surgical conditions, vitamin deficit, and chronic diarrhea often requires early detection to mitigate symptoms and improve the quality of life in these patients. The complexity of CS necessitates individualized care and continuous coordination among specialists to optimize outcomes and enhance patient well-being. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Immunotherapy is increasingly used in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), offering a significant anti-tumor response, as well as causing rising immune-related adverse effects. The incidence of immune checkpoint inhibitorinduced myocarditis-myositis-myasthenia gravis is increasing and particularly concerning due to its high mortality rate. Prompt recognition, diagnosis, and management are crucial. A 40-year-old patient, diagnosed with stage IV nononcogene addicted lung adenocarcinoma, with nivolumab-ipilimumab-chemotherapy as first-line treatment, developed a rare myocarditis-myositis-myasthenia gravis overlap syndrome. Following the treatment, the patient presented with flu-like symptoms and chest pain and subsequently transferred to the cardiac intensive care unit. The physical examination revealed a visual acuity deficit, diplopia, ophthalmoparesis, ptosis, mydriasis, dysphagia, dyspnea, headache, nausea, dry mouth, asthenia, myalgia, and muscle weakness. Imaging and laboratory tests confirmed the triad, showing an elevation of hs-cTnI and CK and positive results for anti-SAE1 and anti-PL-7 Abs. ECG revealed ST segment elevation and RBBB. The echo showed hyperechogenicity of the inferolateral wall, pericardial detachment, and thickening. The cardiac MRI demonstrated hypokinesia, edema, subepicardial LGE, and pericardial effusion. Muscle biopsy revealed muscle fiber necrosis and regeneration with B and T lymphocytic endomysial inflammatory infiltrate and expression of MHC-I. Treatment with oral prednisone, pyridostigmine, and IV Igs was started due to poor clinical response followed by methylprednisolone. Despite stopping immunotherapy, the patient continued to benefit from it, as highlighted on subsequent reevaluation CT scans by partial disease response, and as the patient was in complete remission, we decided to resume chemotherapy by omitting immunotherapy. At the radiological control following the four cycles of double CHT and during CHT maintenance, there was a further reduction of the disease. This report aims to raise awareness among physicians about these serious side effects. A multidisciplinary approach led to clinical improvement and early intervention, optimizing patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Histopathological and molecular factors could play a role in determining LNM in colon cancer. Extended lymphadenectomies in right-sided patients have been associated with complications. We demonstrated that histopathological and molecular analysis can be useful in predicting LNM and therefore identify high risk patients which could potentially benefit from D3 lymphadenectomy/CME. Background: Lymphadenectomy plays a central role in the treatment of localized colon cancer. While in left colon cancer the D3 lymphadenectomy/CME is considered the standard of care, lymphatic stations to be removed in right colon cancer are still a matter of discussion. The individuation of LNM risk factors could help in choosing the lymphadenectomy in right-sided tumors. This study aims to analyze the correlation of histopathological and molecular characteristics with lymph node metastasis, both in right- and left-sided colon cancer, and their impact on survival; Methods: We conducted a single-center observational retrospective study. The following data were collected and analyzed for each patient: demographics, histopathological and molecular data, and intraoperative and perioperative data. Statistical analyses were performed, including descriptive statistics, multivariate logistic regression and survival analysis; Results: An association between tumor size (pT, p < 0.001), grading (p = 0.013), budding (p < 0.001), LVI (79,4% p < 0.001) and LNM was observed. A multivariate analysis identified pT4 (OR 5.45, p < 0.001) and LVI+ (OR 10.7, p < 0.001) as significant predictors of LNM. Right-sided patients presented a worse OS when associated with LNM, while no significant difference was observed in N0 patients; Conclusions: histological and molecular analysis can help identify high risk patients, which could benefit from extended lymphadenectomies. These patients could be ideal candidates for the D3 lymphadenectomy/CME. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC) is a rare site of metastasis in solid tumors, and it is associated with poor prognosis due to disabling symptoms and a scarcity of treatment options. This condition is an uncommon entity in gastric cancer (GC). We present a case of primary LC manifestation in a patient with an incidental diagnosis of localized node-negative GC. We additionally perform a literature review and discuss the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. In conclusion, LC from GC represents a rare condition with a dramatic prognosis. Its diagnosis might be very challenging. A multidisciplinary approach appears to be the best strategy for the management of LC from GC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors arising from neuroendocrine cells, exhibiting a wide range of behaviors from indolent to highly aggressive forms. Treatment options remain limited, particularly for progressive cases. Cabozantinib, a multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has demonstrated potential in targeting key pathways related to tumor growth, angiogenesis, and metastasis. Summary: This review provides a comprehensive analysis of cabozantinib’s therapeutic role across various NEN subtypes, including gastroenteropancreatic NENs, lung NENs, pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas, Merkel cell carcinoma, presacral NENs, pituitary neuroendocrine tumors, and neuroendocrine prostate cancer. Key Messages: The paper discusses several preclinical and clinical studies that demonstrate the efficacy of cabozantinib in slowing tumor progression and improving progression-free survival, particularly in patients with progressive, well-differentiated NENs. However, cabozantinib’s complex toxicity profile limits its broad application, necessitating further research to optimize dosing, particularly in syndromic NENs. Ongoing trials are investigating cabozantinib in combination with somatostatin analogs, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, temozolomide, and immunotherapies in order to overcome treatment resistance and expanding therapeutic strategies for advanced NENs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Drug–drug interactions (DDIs) can affect both treatment efficacy and toxicity. We used Drug-PIN® (Personalized Interactions Network) software in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients to evaluate drug–drug–gene interactions (DDGIs), defined as the combination of DDIs and individual genetic polymorphisms. Inclusion criteria were: (i) stage II-IV CRC; (ii) ECOG PS (Performance status sec. Eastern coperative oncology group) ≤2; (iii) ≥5 concomitant drugs; and (iv) adequate renal, hepatic, and bone marrow function. The Drug-PIN® system analyzes interactions between active and/or pro-drug forms by integrating biochemical, demographic, and genomic data from 110 SNPs. We selected DDI, DrugPin1, and DrugPin2 scores, resulting from concomitant medication interactions, concomitant medications, and SNP profiles, and DrugPin1 added to chemotherapy drugs, respectively. Thirty-four patients, taking a median of seven concomitant medications, were included. The median DrugPin1 and DrugPin2 scores were 42.6 and 77.7, respectively. In 13 patients, the DrugPin2 score was two-fold higher than the DrugPin1 score, with 7 (54%) of these patients experiencing severe toxicity that required hospitalization. On chi-squared testing for any toxicity, a doubled DrugPin2 score (p = 0.001) was significantly related to G3–G4 toxicity. Drug-PIN® software may prevent severe adverse events, decrease hospitalizations, and improve survival in cancer patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The treatment options for GEP-NENs include various drugs and are based on grading, morphology, and location of the primary., Objective: The aim of our work is to investigate the clinical impact of new immune checkpoint inhibitors in order to define a new possible strategy of use within GEP-NENs., Methods: A scientific literature search from 2015 to January 2020 was performed using PubMed and Embase: reviews and prospective or retrospective studies with a minimum of twenty patients were selected; conference proceedings were included., Results: Several studies have been conducted to assess the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in NENs, but nowadays, the current knowledge in this field is mainly based on phase I-II studies. Immunotherapy showed limited antitumor activity, but a higher response rate was reported in poor-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. No specific biomarkers were identified for patient selection and response assessment., Conclusion: Immunotherapy appears as a powerful possibility to help our patients, but nowadays, we see many gaps in this field. We must balance therapeutic possibilities offered by precision oncology with an understanding of the limitations of the application of testing and treatment in clinical practice. Future efforts should focus on research of the best patients to a candidate for immunotherapy in terms of disease characteristics and previous treatments and how to select them with accurate biomarkers., (Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.)