Search

Introduction: Standard regimens for scleroderma interstitial lung diseases (SSc-ILDs) are pulse intravenous (IV) and oral daily cyclophosphamide (CYC). However, IV CYC has limited access to diffuse cutaneous SSc, and oral daily CYC is associated with febrile neutropenia and hemorrhagic cystitis. Pulse oral CYC regimen has never been studied. Objective: To determine the effectiveness of pulse oral CYC therapy in SSc-ILDs, predictors of effectiveness, and side-effects. Methods: A historical cohort study enrolled SSc-ILDs from the SSc database registry at Srinagarind Hospital, Thailand from 1 January 2012 to 1 October 2018. All patients received monthly oral dosages of CYC 600–750 mg/m2, Mesna, and daily prednisolone of 10 mg for 2 years. Changes of FVC, chest radiography, HRCT, 6MWT, and side effects were recorded for the baseline and at the end of the treatment. Response to treatment was defined by (a) stable FVC or a decline ≤ 10% of predicted, (b) unchanged or improved radiographic findings, or (c) a decline 6MWT of ≤ 30 m compared with the baseline. Results: A total of 76 patients with female 52 patients (68.4%) and with a median age of 54.2 years (IQR 46.6–59.6). The majority was dcSSc subset (59 patients; 78.6%). Fifty-four patients (71%) were defined as responsive to therapy. The mean FVC improvement was 1 ml (SD 9.5). The only factor associated with treatment response was limited cutaneous SSc (OR 7.69, 95% CI (1.01, 339.68), p = 0.029). Hemorrhagic cystitis was found in 1 patient. Conclusions: Nearly three-quarters of SSc-ILDs patients had a good response to the pulse oral CYC therapy for 2 years with a few serious side effects. Pulse oral CYC therapy had been effective for SSc-ILDs in case of difficult IV access. Key Point • Pulse oral cyclophosphamide has been used for scleroderma lung disease. It has shown efficacy and safety in scleroderma patients. In patients who have difficulty with intravenous access, pulse oral cyclophosphamide can be an alternative regimen. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematologic malignancy of plasma cell origin. Incidence of pleural effusion in multiple myeloma patients is approximately 6%. Myelomatous pleural effusions (MPE) are rare and occur in less than 1% of all MM cases. MPE is associated with advanced diseases, decreased survival time, and poor treatment response. In our case report, we describe a 59-year old man who presented with MPE at the initial diagnosis of MM. A diagnosis of MPE was reach through pleural fluid cytology and pleural tissue histology. The MPE had good response to initial dexamethasone without local therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Jet nebulizers are commonly used for bronchodilator therapy in COPD. High-flow nasal cannula with vibrating mesh nebulizer (HFNC-VMN) is a recently developed system; however, few studies have compared the efficacy of bronchodilator administration via HFNC-VMN to jet nebulizer in stable COPD. This study aimed to compare the effect of salbutamol administered via HFNC-VMN versus jet nebulizer on airway and lung function in subjects with stable COPD., Methods: This randomized non-inferiority crossover physiologic study enrolled subjects with stable COPD. Salbutamol was nebulized via HFNC-VMN or jet nebulizer in random order with a 4-h washout period between crossover sequences. Spirometry, lung volume, and impulse oscillometry were performed at baseline and after each intervention. The primary outcome was change in FEV 1 from baseline. Secondary outcomes included changes in other respiratory-related parameters and nebulization time compared between the 2 devices., Results: Seventeen subjects were enrolled. HFNC-VMN and jet nebulizer both significantly improved FEV 1 from baseline ( P = .005 and P = .002, respectively). The difference between respiratory resistance at 5 Hz and 20 Hz significantly decreased after HFNC-VMN compared to baseline ( P = .02), while no significant change was observed after jet nebulizer ( P = .056). Area of reactance and resonant frequency of reactance were both significantly decreased ( P = .035 and P = .03, respectively), and respiratory reactance at 5 Hz significantly increased ( P = .02) in the HFNC-VMN group compared to baseline indicating improved lung mechanics, with no significant changes with the jet nebulizer. HFNC-VMN had a shorter nebulization time (6 [5-9] min vs 20 [16-22] min, respectively, P < .001)., Conclusions: Bronchodilator therapy via HFNC-VMN was not inferior to jet nebulizer for subjects with stable COPD and can significantly improve airway oscillometry mechanics and decrease nebulization time compared to jet nebulizer., Competing Interests: Dr Brochard discloses relationships with Medtronic Covidien, Fisher & Paykel, Philips, Sentec, Air Liquide Medical Systems, GE Healthcare, and St. Michael's Hospital. Dr Chow discloses relationships with Thorasys Thoracic Medical Systems and AstraZeneca Canada. The remaining authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 by Daedalus Enterprises.)