Search

We have occasionally seen ring-shaped lateral ventricular nodules <1 cm in diameter during routine brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We investigated retrospectively clinical and MRI findings of the nodules. Review of radiological records was performed for 39,607 patients who underwent brain MRI between January 2001 and April 2008. Nodules were assessed for number, location, shape, and signal intensity, which was determined based on the range of signal intensity from gray to white matter on T1- and T2-weighted imaging. Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), contrast enhancement characteristics, and serial MRI changes of nodules were assessed when available. Nine of 39,607 patients (0.023%) showed the nodules. No symptoms associated with the nodules. Among the nine patients, 11 nodules were identified (one nodule in seven patients (77.8%) and two nodules in two patients (22.2%)). Location was limited to the roof of the body for six nodules (54.5%) and the frontal horn for five patients (45.5%). All nodules (100%) were round and isointense on T1- and T2-weighted imaging. On FLAIR imaging of eight nodules, six (75%) were hyperintense, and two (25%) were isointense. On DWI of seven nodules, all nodules (100%) were isointense. None of seven nodules (0%) examined using postcontrast MRI showed enhancement. None of eight nodules (0%) examined using serial MRI (range, 4–60 months) showed changes in morphology over time. These nodules were incidentally encountered and shared similar MRI features. Although pathological confirmation was lacking in our cases, these nodules may be of nonaggressive nature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A 42-year-old man complaining of left back pain was admitted to our hospital. The hepatis B and C surface antigens were negative. The serum levels of tumor markers were within the reference ranges. Abdominal ultrasound revealed an 8 cm-sized, primarily round and hyperechoic mass in the left lateral segment. Contrast-echo showed non-uniform enhancement in the arterial phase and uniform enhancement in the portal phase. This mass did not indicate"wash-out"on contrast- enhanced CT. It showed hypointensity in the hepatobiliary phase on MRI. The definitive diagnosis could not be obtained, and the patient was suspected with malignancy, such as hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC). Therefore, left hemi-hepatectomy was performed for the diagnostic treatment. Based on the immunochemical staining results, he was diagnosed with angiomyolipoma( AML). AML is composed of fat, blood vessels, and smooth muscles. It is regarded as a tumor of perivascular epithelioid cell tumor(PEComa). Early venous return and adipose tissues in the tumor were the distinctive features of this tumor. The preoperative diagnosis of AML without any fatty component as in this case is very difficult.

Objective: The purpose of our study was to evaluate whether simultaneous injection into cubital veins bilaterally at one half of the standard injection rate achieves similar hepatic and aortic enhancement on MDCT as the conventional injection rate into a single cubital vein., Materials and Methods: Thirty-two patients underwent multiphase MDCT because they were suspected of having a hepatic tumor. Patients were assigned to one of the following two groups: group A, 100 mL of 370 mg I/mL of contrast medium injected into a unilateral cubital vein (one-route) via a 20-gauge cannula at a rate of 4 mL/s; or group B, 50 mL of contrast medium injected into the cubital veins bilaterally (two-route) via 24-gauge cannulas at 2 mL/s. Peak contrast enhancement of the liver and abdominal aorta for groups A and B was measured using regions of interest and compared; arrival time of the contrast media was also compared using a bolus-tracking system. Analysis was performed using Wilcoxon's signed rank test., Results: Peak aortic enhancement of groups A and B was 367 +/- 67 H and 361 +/- 113 H (p = 0.61, not significant), respectively, and peak hepatic enhancement of groups A and B was 56 +/- 11 H and 56 +/- 16 H (p = 0.88, not significant), respectively. Mean arrival time to the aorta of group B (19.4 +/- 3.4 seconds) was significantly later compared with that of group A (15.5 +/- 3.5 seconds) (p = 0.005)., Conclusion: The slower two-route injection produced the same aortic and hepatic enhancement as the faster one-route method with faster injection, but the arrival time of the contrast medium was later using the two-route method.