150 results on '"Asko Noormets"'
Search Results
2. Upscaling Wetland Methane Emissions From the FLUXNET‐CH4 Eddy Covariance Network (UpCH4 v1.0): Model Development, Network Assessment, and Budget Comparison
- Author
-
Gavin McNicol, Etienne Fluet‐Chouinard, Zutao Ouyang, Sara Knox, Zhen Zhang, Tuula Aalto, Sheel Bansal, Kuang‐Yu Chang, Min Chen, Kyle Delwiche, Sarah Feron, Mathias Goeckede, Jinxun Liu, Avni Malhotra, Joe R. Melton, William Riley, Rodrigo Vargas, Kunxiaojia Yuan, Qing Ying, Qing Zhu, Pavel Alekseychik, Mika Aurela, David P. Billesbach, David I. Campbell, Jiquan Chen, Housen Chu, Ankur R. Desai, Eugenie Euskirchen, Jordan Goodrich, Timothy Griffis, Manuel Helbig, Takashi Hirano, Hiroki Iwata, Gerald Jurasinski, John King, Franziska Koebsch, Randall Kolka, Ken Krauss, Annalea Lohila, Ivan Mammarella, Mats Nilson, Asko Noormets, Walter Oechel, Matthias Peichl, Torsten Sachs, Ayaka Sakabe, Christopher Schulze, Oliver Sonnentag, Ryan C. Sullivan, Eeva‐Stiina Tuittila, Masahito Ueyama, Timo Vesala, Eric Ward, Christian Wille, Guan Xhuan Wong, Donatella Zona, Lisamarie Windham‐Myers, Benjamin Poulter, and Robert B. Jackson
- Subjects
global ,wetland ,methane ,eddy covariance ,flux ,random forest ,Geology ,QE1-996.5 ,Geophysics. Cosmic physics ,QC801-809 - Abstract
Abstract Wetlands are responsible for 20%–31% of global methane (CH4) emissions and account for a large source of uncertainty in the global CH4 budget. Data‐driven upscaling of CH4 fluxes from eddy covariance measurements can provide new and independent bottom‐up estimates of wetland CH4 emissions. Here, we develop a six‐predictor random forest upscaling model (UpCH4), trained on 119 site‐years of eddy covariance CH4 flux data from 43 freshwater wetland sites in the FLUXNET‐CH4 Community Product. Network patterns in site‐level annual means and mean seasonal cycles of CH4 fluxes were reproduced accurately in tundra, boreal, and temperate regions (Nash‐Sutcliffe Efficiency ∼0.52–0.63 and 0.53). UpCH4 estimated annual global wetland CH4 emissions of 146 ± 43 TgCH4 y−1 for 2001–2018 which agrees closely with current bottom‐up land surface models (102–181 TgCH4 y−1) and overlaps with top‐down atmospheric inversion models (155–200 TgCH4 y−1). However, UpCH4 diverged from both types of models in the spatial pattern and seasonal dynamics of tropical wetland emissions. We conclude that upscaling of eddy covariance CH4 fluxes has the potential to produce realistic extra‐tropical wetland CH4 emissions estimates which will improve with more flux data. To reduce uncertainty in upscaled estimates, researchers could prioritize new wetland flux sites along humid‐to‐arid tropical climate gradients, from major rainforest basins (Congo, Amazon, and SE Asia), into monsoon (Bangladesh and India) and savannah regions (African Sahel) and be paired with improved knowledge of wetland extent seasonal dynamics in these regions. The monthly wetland methane products gridded at 0.25° from UpCH4 are available via ORNL DAAC (https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/2253).
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Asynchrony of the seasonal dynamics of gross primary production and ecosystem respiration
- Author
-
Linqing Yang and Asko Noormets
- Subjects
phenology ,gross primary production ,ecosystem respiration ,eddy covariance ,carbon sequestration ,Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering ,TD1-1066 ,Environmental sciences ,GE1-350 ,Science ,Physics ,QC1-999 - Abstract
The phenological cycles of terrestrial ecosystems have shifted with the changing climate, and the altered timings of biogeochemical fluxes may also exert feedback on the climate system. As regulators of land carbon balance, relative shifts in photosynthetic and respiratory phenology under climate change are of great importance. However, the relative seasonal dynamics of these individual processes and their sensitivity to climate factors as well as the implications for carbon cycling are not well understood. In this study, we examined the relationship in the seasonality of gross primary production (GPP) and ecosystem respiration (RE) as well as their temperature sensitivities and the implications for carbon uptake with around 1500 site-years’ of data from FLUXNET 2015 and Boreal Ecosystem Productivity Simulator (BEPS) at 212 sites. The results showed that RE started earlier in the spring and ended later in the autumn than GPP over most biomes. Furthermore, the flux phenology metrics responded differently to temperature: GPP phenology was more sensitive to changes during the spring temperature than RE phenology, and less sensitive to autumn temperature than RE. We found large BEPS-observation discrepancies in seasonality metrics and their apparent temperature sensitivity. The site-based BEPS projections did not capture the observed seasonal metrics and temperature sensitivities in either GPP or RE seasonality metrics. Improved understanding of the asynchrony of GPP and RE as well as different sensitivity of environmental factors are of great significance for reliable future carbon balance projections.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Substantial hysteresis in emergent temperature sensitivity of global wetland CH4 emissions
- Author
-
Kuang-Yu Chang, William J. Riley, Sara H. Knox, Robert B. Jackson, Gavin McNicol, Benjamin Poulter, Mika Aurela, Dennis Baldocchi, Sheel Bansal, Gil Bohrer, David I. Campbell, Alessandro Cescatti, Housen Chu, Kyle B. Delwiche, Ankur R. Desai, Eugenie Euskirchen, Thomas Friborg, Mathias Goeckede, Manuel Helbig, Kyle S. Hemes, Takashi Hirano, Hiroki Iwata, Minseok Kang, Trevor Keenan, Ken W. Krauss, Annalea Lohila, Ivan Mammarella, Bhaskar Mitra, Akira Miyata, Mats B. Nilsson, Asko Noormets, Walter C. Oechel, Dario Papale, Matthias Peichl, Michele L. Reba, Janne Rinne, Benjamin R. K. Runkle, Youngryel Ryu, Torsten Sachs, Karina V. R. Schäfer, Hans Peter Schmid, Narasinha Shurpali, Oliver Sonnentag, Angela C. I. Tang, Margaret S. Torn, Carlo Trotta, Eeva-Stiina Tuittila, Masahito Ueyama, Rodrigo Vargas, Timo Vesala, Lisamarie Windham-Myers, Zhen Zhang, and Donatella Zona
- Subjects
Science - Abstract
Wetland methane emissions contribute to global warming, and are oversimplified in climate models. Here the authors use eddy covariance measurements from 48 global sites to demonstrate seasonal hysteresis in methane-temperature relationships and suggest the importance of microbial processes.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Site Characteristics Mediate the Relationship Between Forest Productivity and Satellite Measured Solar Induced Fluorescence
- Author
-
Theresia Yazbeck, Gil Bohrer, Pierre Gentine, Luping Ye, Nicola Arriga, Christian Bernhofer, Peter D. Blanken, Ankur R. Desai, David Durden, Alexander Knohl, Natalia Kowalska, Stefan Metzger, Meelis Mölder, Asko Noormets, Kim Novick, Russell L. Scott, Ladislav Šigut, Kamel Soudani, Masahito Ueyama, and Andrej Varlagin
- Subjects
Gross Primary Production ,Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence ,canopy conductance ,canopy structure ,photosynthesis ,Forestry ,SD1-669.5 ,Environmental sciences ,GE1-350 - Abstract
Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence (SIF) can provide key information about the state of photosynthesis and offers the prospect of defining remote sensing-based estimation of Gross Primary Production (GPP). There is strong theoretical support for the link between SIF and GPP and this relationship has been empirically demonstrated using ground-based, airborne, and satellite-based SIF observations, as well as modeling. However, most evaluations have been based on monthly and annual scales, yet the GPP:SIF relations can be strongly influenced by both vegetation structure and physiology. At the monthly timescales, the structural response often dominates but short-term physiological variations can strongly impact the GPP:SIF relations. Here, we test how well SIF can predict the inter-daily variation of GPP during the growing season and under stress conditions, while taking into account the local effect of sites and abiotic conditions. We compare the accuracy of GPP predictions from SIF at different timescales (half-hourly, daily, and weekly), while evaluating effect of adding environmental variables to the relationship. We utilize observations for years 2018–2019 at 31 mid-latitudes, forested, eddy covariance (EC) flux sites in North America and Europe and use TROPOMI satellite data for SIF. Our results show that SIF is a good predictor of GPP, when accounting for inter-site variation, probably due to differences in canopy structure. Seasonally averaged leaf area index, fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (fPAR) and canopy conductance provide a predictor to the site-level effect. We show that fPAR is the main factor driving errors in the linear model at high temporal resolution. Adding water stress indicators, namely canopy conductance, to a multi-linear SIF-based GPP model provides the best improvement in the model precision at the three considered timescales, showing the importance of accounting for water stress in GPP predictions, independent of the SIF signal. SIF is a promising predictor for GPP among other remote sensing variables, but more focus should be placed on including canopy structure, and water stress effects in the relationship, especially when considering intra-seasonal, and inter- and intra-daily resolutions.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Millennial-Scale Carbon Storage in Natural Pine Forests of the North Carolina Lower Coastal Plain: Effects of Artificial Drainage in a Time of Rapid Sea Level Rise
- Author
-
Maricar Aguilos, Charlton Brown, Kevan Minick, Milan Fischer, Omoyemeh J. Ile, Deanna Hardesty, Maccoy Kerrigan, Asko Noormets, and John King
- Subjects
ghost forest ,forested wetland ,aboveground biomass ,soil carbon ,carbon dating ,Agriculture - Abstract
Coastal forested wetlands provide important ecosystem services along the southeastern region of the United States, but are threatened by anthropogenic and natural disturbances. Here, we examined the species composition, mortality, aboveground biomass, and carbon content of vegetation and soils in natural pine forests of the lower coastal plain in eastern North Carolina, USA. We compared a forest clearly in decline (termed “ghost forest”) adjacent to a roadside canal that had been installed as drainage for a road next to an adjacent forest subject to “natural” hydrology, unaltered by human modification (termed “healthy forest”). We also assessed how soil organic carbon (SOC) accumulation changed over time using 14C radiocarbon dating of wood sampled at different depths within the peat profile. Our results showed that the ghost forest had a higher tree density at 687 trees ha−1, and was dominated by swamp bays (Persea palustric), compared to the healthy forest, which had 265 trees ha−1 dominated by pond pine (Pinus serotina Michx). Overstory tree mortality of the ghost forest was nearly ten times greater than the healthy forest (p < 0.05), which actually contributed to higher total aboveground biomass (55.9 ± 12.6 Mg C ha−1 vs. 27.9 ± 8.7 Mg ha−1 in healthy forest), as the dead standing tree biomass (snags) added to that of an encroaching woody shrub layer during ecosystem transition. Therefore, the total aboveground C content of the ghost forest, 33.98 ± 14.8 Mg C ha−1, was higher than the healthy forest, 24.7 ± 5.2 Mg C ha−1 (p < 0.05). The total SOC stock down to a 2.3 m depth in the ghost forest was 824.1 ± 46.2 Mg C ha−1, while that of the healthy forest was 749.0 ± 170.5 Mg C ha−1 (p > 0.05). Carbon dating of organic sediments indicated that, as the sample age approaches modern times (surface layer year 2015), the organic soil accumulation rate (1.11 to 1.13 mm year−1) is unable to keep pace with the estimated rate of recent sea level rise (2.1 to 2.4 mm year−1), suggesting a causative relationship with the ecosystem transition occurring at the site. Increasing hydrologic stress over recent decades appears to have been a major driver of ecosystem transition, that is, ghost forest formation and woody shrub encroachment, as indicated by the far higher overstory tree mortality adjacent to the drainage ditch, which allows the inland propagation of hydrologic/salinity forcing due to SLR and extreme storms. Our study documents C accumulation in a coastal wetland over the past two millennia, which is now threatened due to the recent increase in the rate of SLR exceeding the natural peat accumulation rate, causing an ecosystem transition with unknown consequences for the stored C; however, much of it will eventually be returned to the atmosphere. More studies are needed to determine the causes and consequences of coastal ecosystem transition to inform the modeling of future coastal wetland responses to environmental change and the estimation of regional terrestrial C stocks and flux.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Author Correction: The FLUXNET2015 dataset and the ONEFlux processing pipeline for eddy covariance data
- Author
-
Gilberto Pastorello, Carlo Trotta, Eleonora Canfora, Housen Chu, Danielle Christianson, You-Wei Cheah, Cristina Poindexter, Jiquan Chen, Abdelrahman Elbashandy, Marty Humphrey, Peter Isaac, Diego Polidori, Markus Reichstein, Alessio Ribeca, Catharine van Ingen, Nicolas Vuichard, Leiming Zhang, Brian Amiro, Christof Ammann, M. Altaf Arain, Jonas Ardö, Timothy Arkebauer, Stefan K. Arndt, Nicola Arriga, Marc Aubinet, Mika Aurela, Dennis Baldocchi, Alan Barr, Eric Beamesderfer, Luca Belelli Marchesini, Onil Bergeron, Jason Beringer, Christian Bernhofer, Daniel Berveiller, Dave Billesbach, Thomas Andrew Black, Peter D. Blanken, Gil Bohrer, Julia Boike, Paul V. Bolstad, Damien Bonal, Jean-Marc Bonnefond, David R. Bowling, Rosvel Bracho, Jason Brodeur, Christian Brümmer, Nina Buchmann, Benoit Burban, Sean P. Burns, Pauline Buysse, Peter Cale, Mauro Cavagna, Pierre Cellier, Shiping Chen, Isaac Chini, Torben R. Christensen, James Cleverly, Alessio Collalti, Claudia Consalvo, Bruce D. Cook, David Cook, Carole Coursolle, Edoardo Cremonese, Peter S. Curtis, Ettore D’Andrea, Humberto da Rocha, Xiaoqin Dai, Kenneth J. Davis, Bruno De Cinti, Agnes de Grandcourt, Anne De Ligne, Raimundo C. De Oliveira, Nicolas Delpierre, Ankur R. Desai, Carlos Marcelo Di Bella, Paul di Tommasi, Han Dolman, Francisco Domingo, Gang Dong, Sabina Dore, Pierpaolo Duce, Eric Dufrêne, Allison Dunn, Jiří Dušek, Derek Eamus, Uwe Eichelmann, Hatim Abdalla M. ElKhidir, Werner Eugster, Cacilia M. Ewenz, Brent Ewers, Daniela Famulari, Silvano Fares, Iris Feigenwinter, Andrew Feitz, Rasmus Fensholt, Gianluca Filippa, Marc Fischer, John Frank, Marta Galvagno, Mana Gharun, Damiano Gianelle, Bert Gielen, Beniamino Gioli, Anatoly Gitelson, Ignacio Goded, Mathias Goeckede, Allen H. Goldstein, Christopher M. Gough, Michael L. Goulden, Alexander Graf, Anne Griebel, Carsten Gruening, Thomas Grünwald, Albin Hammerle, Shijie Han, Xingguo Han, Birger Ulf Hansen, Chad Hanson, Juha Hatakka, Yongtao He, Markus Hehn, Bernard Heinesch, Nina Hinko-Najera, Lukas Hörtnagl, Lindsay Hutley, Andreas Ibrom, Hiroki Ikawa, Marcin Jackowicz-Korczynski, Dalibor Janouš, Wilma Jans, Rachhpal Jassal, Shicheng Jiang, Tomomichi Kato, Myroslava Khomik, Janina Klatt, Alexander Knohl, Sara Knox, Hideki Kobayashi, Georgia Koerber, Olaf Kolle, Yoshiko Kosugi, Ayumi Kotani, Andrew Kowalski, Bart Kruijt, Julia Kurbatova, Werner L. Kutsch, Hyojung Kwon, Samuli Launiainen, Tuomas Laurila, Bev Law, Ray Leuning, Yingnian Li, Michael Liddell, Jean-Marc Limousin, Marryanna Lion, Adam J. Liska, Annalea Lohila, Ana López-Ballesteros, Efrén López-Blanco, Benjamin Loubet, Denis Loustau, Antje Lucas-Moffat, Johannes Lüers, Siyan Ma, Craig Macfarlane, Vincenzo Magliulo, Regine Maier, Ivan Mammarella, Giovanni Manca, Barbara Marcolla, Hank A. Margolis, Serena Marras, William Massman, Mikhail Mastepanov, Roser Matamala, Jaclyn Hatala Matthes, Francesco Mazzenga, Harry McCaughey, Ian McHugh, Andrew M. S. McMillan, Lutz Merbold, Wayne Meyer, Tilden Meyers, Scott D. Miller, Stefano Minerbi, Uta Moderow, Russell K. Monson, Leonardo Montagnani, Caitlin E. Moore, Eddy Moors, Virginie Moreaux, Christine Moureaux, J. William Munger, Taro Nakai, Johan Neirynck, Zoran Nesic, Giacomo Nicolini, Asko Noormets, Matthew Northwood, Marcelo Nosetto, Yann Nouvellon, Kimberly Novick, Walter Oechel, Jørgen Eivind Olesen, Jean-Marc Ourcival, Shirley A. Papuga, Frans-Jan Parmentier, Eugenie Paul-Limoges, Marian Pavelka, Matthias Peichl, Elise Pendall, Richard P. Phillips, Kim Pilegaard, Norbert Pirk, Gabriela Posse, Thomas Powell, Heiko Prasse, Suzanne M. Prober, Serge Rambal, Üllar Rannik, Naama Raz-Yaseef, Corinna Rebmann, David Reed, Victor Resco de Dios, Natalia Restrepo-Coupe, Borja R. Reverter, Marilyn Roland, Simone Sabbatini, Torsten Sachs, Scott R. Saleska, Enrique P. Sánchez-Cañete, Zulia M. Sanchez-Mejia, Hans Peter Schmid, Marius Schmidt, Karl Schneider, Frederik Schrader, Ivan Schroder, Russell L. Scott, Pavel Sedlák, Penélope Serrano-Ortíz, Changliang Shao, Peili Shi, Ivan Shironya, Lukas Siebicke, Ladislav Šigut, Richard Silberstein, Costantino Sirca, Donatella Spano, Rainer Steinbrecher, Robert M. Stevens, Cove Sturtevant, Andy Suyker, Torbern Tagesson, Satoru Takanashi, Yanhong Tang, Nigel Tapper, Jonathan Thom, Michele Tomassucci, Juha-Pekka Tuovinen, Shawn Urbanski, Riccardo Valentini, Michiel van der Molen, Eva van Gorsel, Ko van Huissteden, Andrej Varlagin, Joseph Verfaillie, Timo Vesala, Caroline Vincke, Domenico Vitale, Natalia Vygodskaya, Jeffrey P. Walker, Elizabeth Walter-Shea, Huimin Wang, Robin Weber, Sebastian Westermann, Christian Wille, Steven Wofsy, Georg Wohlfahrt, Sebastian Wolf, William Woodgate, Yuelin Li, Roberto Zampedri, Junhui Zhang, Guoyi Zhou, Donatella Zona, Deb Agarwal, Sebastien Biraud, Margaret Torn, and Dario Papale
- Subjects
Science - Abstract
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021-00851-9.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Forest Drought Response Index (ForDRI): A New Combined Model to Monitor Forest Drought in the Eastern United States
- Author
-
Tsegaye Tadesse, David Y. Hollinger, Yared A. Bayissa, Mark Svoboda, Brian Fuchs, Beichen Zhang, Getachew Demissie, Brian D. Wardlow, Gil Bohrer, Kenneth L. Clark, Ankur R. Desai, Lianhong Gu, Asko Noormets, Kimberly A. Novick, and Andrew D. Richardson
- Subjects
forest monitoring ,drought ,time series satellite data ,Bowen ratio ,carbon flux ,Science - Abstract
Monitoring drought impacts in forest ecosystems is a complex process because forest ecosystems are composed of different species with heterogeneous structural compositions. Even though forest drought status is a key control on the carbon cycle, very few indices exist to monitor and predict forest drought stress. The Forest Drought Indicator (ForDRI) is a new monitoring tool developed by the National Drought Mitigation Center (NDMC) to identify forest drought stress. ForDRI integrates 12 types of data, including satellite, climate, evaporative demand, ground water, and soil moisture, into a single hybrid index to estimate tree stress. The model uses Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to determine the contribution of each input variable based on its covariance in the historical records (2003–2017). A 15-year time series of 780 ForDRI maps at a weekly interval were produced. The ForDRI values at a 12.5km spatial resolution were compared with normalized weekly Bowen ratio data, a biophysically based indicator of stress, from nine AmeriFlux sites. There were strong and significant correlations between Bowen ratio data and ForDRI at sites that had experienced intense drought. In addition, tree ring annual increment data at eight sites in four eastern U.S. national parks were compared with ForDRI values at the corresponding sites. The correlation between ForDRI and tree ring increments at the selected eight sites during the summer season ranged between 0.46 and 0.75. Generally, the correlation between the ForDRI and normalized Bowen ratio or tree ring increment are reasonably good and indicate the usefulness of the ForDRI model for estimating drought stress and providing decision support on forest drought management.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Performance of Linear and Nonlinear Two-Leaf Light Use Efficiency Models at Different Temporal Scales
- Author
-
Xiaocui Wu, Weimin Ju, Yanlian Zhou, Mingzhu He, Beverly E. Law, T. Andrew Black, Hank A. Margolis, Alessandro Cescatti, Lianhong Gu, Leonardo Montagnani, Asko Noormets, Timothy J. Griffis, Kim Pilegaard, Andrej Varlagin, Riccardo Valentini, Peter D. Blanken, Shaoqiang Wang, Huimin Wang, Shijie Han, Junhua Yan, Yingnian Li, Bingbing Zhou, and Yibo Liu
- Subjects
gross primary productivity (GPP) ,light use efficiency model ,sunlit and shaded leaves ,vegetation types ,temporal scales ,Science - Abstract
The reliable simulation of gross primary productivity (GPP) at various spatial and temporal scales is of significance to quantifying the net exchange of carbon between terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere. This study aimed to verify the ability of a nonlinear two-leaf model (TL-LUEn), a linear two-leaf model (TL-LUE), and a big-leaf light use efficiency model (MOD17) to simulate GPP at half-hourly, daily and 8-day scales using GPP derived from 58 eddy-covariance flux sites in Asia, Europe and North America as benchmarks. Model evaluation showed that the overall performance of TL-LUEn was slightly but not significantly better than TL-LUE at half-hourly and daily scale, while the overall performance of both TL-LUEn and TL-LUE were significantly better (p < 0.0001) than MOD17 at the two temporal scales. The improvement of TL-LUEn over TL-LUE was relatively small in comparison with the improvement of TL-LUE over MOD17. However, the differences between TL-LUEn and MOD17, and TL-LUE and MOD17 became less distinct at the 8-day scale. As for different vegetation types, TL-LUEn and TL-LUE performed better than MOD17 for all vegetation types except crops at the half-hourly scale. At the daily and 8-day scales, both TL-LUEn and TL-LUE outperformed MOD17 for forests. However, TL-LUEn had a mixed performance for the three non-forest types while TL-LUE outperformed MOD17 slightly for all these non-forest types at daily and 8-day scales. The better performance of TL-LUEn and TL-LUE for forests was mainly achieved by the correction of the underestimation/overestimation of GPP simulated by MOD17 under low/high solar radiation and sky clearness conditions. TL-LUEn is more applicable at individual sites at the half-hourly scale while TL-LUE could be regionally used at half-hourly, daily and 8-day scales. MOD17 is also an applicable option regionally at the 8-day scale.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Spatial heterogeneity in CO2, CH4, and energy fluxes: insights from airborne eddy covariance measurements over the Mid-Atlantic region
- Author
-
Reem A Hannun, Glenn M Wolfe, S Randy Kawa, Thomas F Hanisco, Paul A Newman, Joseph G Alfieri, John Barrick, Kenneth L Clark, Joshua P DiGangi, Glenn S Diskin, John King, William P Kustas, Bhaskar Mitra, Asko Noormets, John B Nowak, K Lee Thornhill, and Rodrigo Vargas
- Subjects
airborne eddy covariance ,CO2 and CH4 ,fluxes ,biosphere-atmosphere exchange ,Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering ,TD1-1066 ,Environmental sciences ,GE1-350 ,Science ,Physics ,QC1-999 - Abstract
The exchange of carbon between the Earth’s atmosphere and biosphere influences the atmospheric abundances of carbon dioxide (CO _2 ) and methane (CH _4 ). Airborne eddy covariance (EC) can quantify surface-atmosphere exchange from landscape-to-regional scales, offering a unique perspective on carbon cycle dynamics. We use extensive airborne measurements to quantify fluxes of sensible heat, latent heat, CO _2 , and CH _4 across multiple ecosystems in the Mid-Atlantic region during September 2016 and May 2017. In conjunction with footprint analysis and land cover information, we use the airborne dataset to explore the effects of landscape heterogeneity on measured fluxes. Our results demonstrate large variability in CO _2 uptake over mixed agricultural and forested sites, with fluxes ranging from −3.4 ± 0.7 to −11.5 ± 1.6 μ mol m ^−2 s ^−1 for croplands and −9.1 ± 1.5 to −22.7 ± 3.2 μ mol m ^−2 s ^−1 for forests. We also report substantial CH _4 emissions of 32.3 ± 17.0 to 76.1 ± 29.4 nmol m ^−2 s ^−1 from a brackish herbaceous wetland and 58.4 ± 12.0 to 181.2 ± 36.8 nmol m ^−2 s ^−1 from a freshwater forested wetland. Comparison of ecosystem-specific aircraft observations with measurements from EC flux towers along the flight path demonstrate that towers capture ∼30%–75% of the regional variability in ecosystem fluxes. Diel patterns measured at the tower sites suggest that peak, midday flux measurements from aircraft accurately predict net daily CO _2 exchange. We discuss next steps in applying airborne observations to evaluate bottom-up flux models and improve understanding of the biophysical processes that drive carbon exchange from landscape-to-regional scales.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Quantifying the effect of forest age in annual net forest carbon balance
- Author
-
Simon Besnard, Nuno Carvalhais, M Altaf Arain, Andrew Black, Sytze de Bruin, Nina Buchmann, Alessandro Cescatti, Jiquan Chen, Jan G P W Clevers, Ankur R Desai, Christopher M Gough, Katerina Havrankova, Martin Herold, Lukas Hörtnagl, Martin Jung, Alexander Knohl, Bart Kruijt, Lenka Krupkova, Beverly E Law, Anders Lindroth, Asko Noormets, Olivier Roupsard, Rainer Steinbrecher, Andrej Varlagin, Caroline Vincke, and Markus Reichstein
- Subjects
carbon cycle ,eddy covariance ,net ecosystem production ,empirical modelling ,forest age ,climate ,Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering ,TD1-1066 ,Environmental sciences ,GE1-350 ,Science ,Physics ,QC1-999 - Abstract
Forests dominate carbon (C) exchanges between the terrestrial biosphere and the atmosphere on land. In the long term, the net carbon flux between forests and the atmosphere has been significantly impacted by changes in forest cover area and structure due to ecological disturbances and management activities. Current empirical approaches for estimating net ecosystem productivity (NEP) rarely consider forest age as a predictor, which represents variation in physiological processes that can respond differently to environmental drivers, and regrowth following disturbance. Here, we conduct an observational synthesis to empirically determine to what extent climate, soil properties, nitrogen deposition, forest age and management influence the spatial and interannual variability of forest NEP across 126 forest eddy-covariance flux sites worldwide. The empirical models explained up to 62% and 71% of spatio-temporal and across-site variability of annual NEP, respectively. An investigation of model structures revealed that forest age was a dominant factor of NEP spatio-temporal variability in both space and time at the global scale as compared to abiotic factors, such as nutrient availability, soil characteristics and climate. These findings emphasize the importance of forest age in quantifying spatio-temporal variation in NEP using empirical approaches.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Evaluating and bridging the flux-variance and surface renewal methods
- Author
-
Milan Fischer, Gabriel Katul, Asko Noormets, Gabriela Pozníková, Jean-Christophe Domec, Matěj Orság, Miroslav Trnka, and John S. King
- Abstract
Two micrometeorological methods that utilize high frequency sampling of air temperature were tested against eddy covariance (EC) sensible heat flux (H) measurements at three sites representing agricultural, agro-forestry and forestry systems. The two methods encompass conventional and newly proposed forms of the flux-variance (FV) and surface renewal (SR) schemes. In terms of measurement setup, the sites represent surface, roughness and roughness to surface transitional layers, respectively. After the selection of the most reliable approaches, regression analyses against EC showed that both methods can estimate H with slopes within ±10 % from unity, and coefficient of determination R2 >0.9 across all three sites. The best performance, of both FV and SR, was at the agricultural field, where the measurements were within the surface layer. The worst performance occurred in the tall, relatively heterogeneous forest, where the measurements were taken in the roughness sublayer, the depth of which (with its inherent uncertainty) needs to be taken into account in the calculations. In addition to the evaluation of the FV and SR forms, an alternative perspective relating ramp-like structures to the vertical temperature gradients in the surface boundary layer is introduced here. Ramp-like structures carry much of the heat flux and temperature variance, representing opportunities to constrain the coefficients of the two methods. As a corollary, we introduce a novel approach emerging from bridging FV and SR methods that combines information about the coherent structures with the overall variance to obtain heat fluxes in a turbulent atmosphere. The proposed approach yields reliable H estimates without the need for site-specific calibration and instrumentation other than a single fast thermocouple. Acknowledgement: This study was conducted with support of SustES - Adaptation strategies for sustainable ecosystem services and food security under adverse environmental conditions (CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000797) and USDA NIFA-AFRI Sustainable Bioenergy Program, 2011-67009-20089, Loblolly pine-switch grass intercropping for sustainable timber and biofuels production in the Southeastern United States. Funding for AmeriFlux core site US-NC4 (natural forested wetland) was provided by the USDA NIFA (Multi-agency A.5 Carbon Cycle Science Program) award 2014-67003-22068. Additional funding was provided by the DOE NICCR award 08-SC-NICCR-1072, the USDA Forest Service award 13-JV-11330110-081, and the DOE LBNL award DE-AC02-05CH11231.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Spatial variability in tree-ring carbon isotope discrimination in response to local drought across the entire loblolly pine natural range
- Author
-
Madison Akers, Jean-Christophe Domec, Timothy A. Martin, Cassandra R. Meek, Asko Noormets, Lisa J. Samuelson, Marshall A. Laviner, Rodney E. Will, Thomas R. Fox, Jason G. Vogel, John D. Marshall, Wen Lin, Ge Sun, John S. King, Steve McNulty, and Josh Cucinella
- Subjects
Carbon Isotopes ,Spatial correlation ,δ13C ,Physiology ,Water ,Pinus taeda ,Plant Science ,Deserts and xeric shrublands ,Atmospheric sciences ,Acclimatization ,Droughts ,Trees ,Isotopes of carbon ,Dendrochronology ,Environmental science ,Spatial variability ,Water use - Abstract
Considering the temporal responses of carbon isotope discrimination (Δ13C) to local water availability in the spatial analysis of Δ13C is essential for evaluating the contribution of environmental and genetic facets of plant Δ13C. Using tree-ring Δ13C from years with contrasting water availability at 76 locations across the natural range of loblolly pine, we decomposed site-level Δ13C signals to maximum Δ13C in well-watered conditions (Δ13Cmax) and isotopic drought sensitivity (m) as a change in Δ13C per unit change of Palmer’s Drought Severity Index (PDSI). Site water status, especially the tree lifetime average PDSI, was the primary factor affecting Δ13Cmax. The strong spatial correlation exhibited by m was related to both genetic and environmental factors. The long-term average water availability during the period relevant to trees as indicated by lifetime average PDSI correlated with Δ13Cmax, suggesting acclimation in tree gas-exchange traits, independent of incident water availability. The positive correlation between lifetime average PDSI and m indicated that loblolly pines were more sensitive to drought at mesic than xeric sites. The m was found to relate to a plant’s stomatal control and may be employed as a genetic indicator of efficient water use strategies. Partitioning Δ13C to Δ13Cmax and m provided a new angle for understanding sources of variation in plant Δ13C, with several fundamental and applied implications.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Beyond carbon flux partitioning: Carbon allocation and nonstructural carbon dynamics inferred from continuous fluxes
- Author
-
Guofang Miao, Asko Noormets, Michael Gavazzi, Bhaskar Mitra, Jean‐Christophe Domec, Ge Sun, Steve McNulty, and John S. King
- Subjects
Soil ,Ecology ,Pinus taeda ,Carbon Dioxide ,Carbon ,Ecosystem ,Carbon Cycle - Abstract
Carbon (C) allocation and nonstructural carbon (NSC) dynamics play essential roles in plant growth and survival under stress and disturbance. However, quantitative understanding of these processes remains limited. Here we propose a framework where we connect commonly measured carbon cycle components (eddy covariance fluxes of canopy CO
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Aquaporins, and not changes in root structure, provide new insights into physiological responses to drought, flooding, and salinity
- Author
-
Anna Treado Overby, Rémi Wortemann, William K. Smith, John S. King, Daniel M. Johnson, Mary Jane Carmichael, Asko Noormets, Guofang Miao, Jean-Christophe Domec, Interactions Sol Plante Atmosphère (UMR ISPA), Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Sciences Agronomiques de Bordeaux-Aquitaine (Bordeaux Sciences Agro)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University [Durham], North Carolina State University [Raleigh] (NC State), University of North Carolina System (UNC), Hollins University, Clemson University, SILVA (SILVA), AgroParisTech-Université de Lorraine (UL)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Wake Forest University, Fujian Normal University [Fujian], Texas A&M University System, University of Georgia [USA], ANR-18-PRIM-0006,SWATCH,Effet du changement climatique sur les stratégies d'amélioration de l'utilisation en eau des bassin versants et des systèmes agrosylvopastoraux Méditerranéens(2018), and ANR-17-ASIE-0007,CWSSEA,Assessments of vulnerability of mature and secondary forests to climatic water stress in Southeast Asia(2017)
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,0301 basic medicine ,Salinity ,Stomatal conductance ,loblolly pine ,Physiology ,Vapour Pressure Deficit ,Aquaporin ,Plant Science ,Root system ,Aquaporins ,01 natural sciences ,Acclimatization ,Taxodium distichum ,aquaporin activity ,water stress ,03 medical and health sciences ,flooding ,bald cypress ,Ecosystem ,Water transport ,Chemistry ,fungi ,Water ,food and beverages ,Xylem ,Plant Transpiration ,plant hydraulics ,Pinus taeda ,15. Life on land ,leaf water relations ,Floods ,conductances ,Droughts ,Plant Leaves ,030104 developmental biology ,Agronomy ,13. Climate action ,[SDE]Environmental Sciences ,010606 plant biology & botany - Abstract
The influence of aquaporin (AQP) activity on plant water movement remains unclear, especially in plants subject to unfavorable conditions. We applied a multitiered approach at a range of plant scales to (i) characterize the resistances controlling water transport under drought, flooding, and flooding plus salinity conditions; (ii) quantify the respective effects of AQP activity and xylem structure on root (Kroot), stem (Kstem), and leaf (Kleaf) conductances; and (iii) evaluate the impact of AQP-regulated transport capacity on gas exchange. We found that drought, flooding, and flooding plus salinity reduced Kroot and root AQP activity in Pinus taeda, whereas Kroot of the flood-tolerant Taxodium distichum did not decline under flooding. The extent of the AQP control of transport efficiency varied among organs and species, ranging from 35–55% in Kroot to 10–30% in Kstem and Kleaf. In response to treatments, AQP-mediated inhibition of Kroot rather than changes in xylem acclimation controlled the fluctuations in Kroot. The reduction in stomatal conductance and its sensitivity to vapor pressure deficit were direct responses to decreased whole-plant conductance triggered by lower Kroot and larger resistance belowground. Our results provide new mechanistic and functional insights on plant hydraulics that are essential to quantifying the influences of future stress on ecosystem function.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Gap-filling eddy covariance methane fluxes : Comparison of machine learning model predictions and uncertainties at FLUXNET-CH4 wetlands
- Author
-
Sheel Bansal, Lisamarie Windham-Myers, Karina V. R. Schäfer, Christian Wille, Han Dolman, Hiroki Iwata, Mats Nilsson, Robert Shortt, Andrew D. Richardson, Pavel Alekseychik, Sarah Feron, Benjamin Poulter, David P. Billesbach, Kyle B. Delwiche, Walter C. Oechel, Anand Avati, Avni Malhotra, Jiquan Chen, Fred Lu, Ivan Mammarella, Lutz Merbold, Ankur R. Desai, Robert B. Jackson, Pia Gottschalk, Carole Helfter, Bhaskar Mitra, Kathrin Fuchs, Takashi Hirano, Manuel Helbig, Edward A. G. Schuur, M. Goeckede, Domenico Vitale, Zutao Ouyang, Andrew Y. Ng, Mangaliso J. Gondwe, Regine Maier, M. C. R. Alberto, Asko Noormets, Thomas Friborg, Patricia Y. Oikawa, Torsten Sachs, Franziska Koebsch, Eiko Nemitz, Andrej Varlagin, Dario Papale, Keisuke Ono, Jeremy Irvin, Matthias Peichl, Jordan P. Goodrich, Carlo Trotta, Gil Bohrer, Gerardo Celis, David I. Campbell, Camilo Rey-Sanchez, Vincent Liu, Sara H. Knox, Benjamin R. K. Runkle, Sébastien Gogo, Andrew Kondrich, Guan Xhuan Wong, Sharon Zhou, Housen Chu, Kuno Kasak, Lukas Hörtnagl, Timothy H. Morin, Oliver Sonnentag, George L. Vourlitis, Rodrigo Vargas, Derrick Y.F. Lai, Kyle S. Hemes, Ryan C. Sullivan, E. J. Ward, Masahito Ueyama, Annalea Lohila, Gerald Jurasinski, Daphne Szutu, Eeva-Stiina Tuittila, Gavin McNicol, Donatella Zona, Ayaka Sakabe, Cove Sturtevant, Aram Kalhori, Antje Lucas-Moffat, Mika Aurela, Dennis D. Baldocchi, Martin Heimann, Eugénie S. Euskirchen, Adrien Jacotot, Alex C. Valach, Ellen Stuart-Haëntjens, Joeseph G. Verfaillie, Higo J. Dalmagro, Etienne Fluet-Chouinard, Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research (INAR), Micrometeorology and biogeochemical cycles, Earth and Climate, Earth Sciences, Institut des Sciences de la Terre d'Orléans - UMR7327 (ISTO), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université d'Orléans (UO)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Observatoire des Sciences de l'Univers en région Centre (OSUC), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Observatoire de Paris, Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université d'Orléans (UO)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Observatoire de Paris, Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université d'Orléans (UO)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières (BRGM) (BRGM), Biogéosystèmes Continentaux - UMR7327, and Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université d'Orléans (UO)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières (BRGM) (BRGM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université d'Orléans (UO)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Observatoire des Sciences de l'Univers en région Centre (OSUC)
- Subjects
Atmospheric Science ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,imputation ,computer.software_genre ,01 natural sciences ,CARBON-DIOXIDE ,FluxNet ,Imputation (statistics) ,ENVIRONMENTAL DRIVERS ,EMISSIONS ,Global and Planetary Change ,Artificial neural network ,methane ,Sampling (statistics) ,Forestry ,04 agricultural and veterinary sciences ,6. Clean water ,machine learning ,RESPIRATION ,CO2 ,Marginal distribution ,SDG 6 - Clean Water and Sanitation ,gap-filling ,CH4 FLUX ,time series ,methane flux ,wetlands ,ASSIMILATION ,Eddy covariance ,Decision tree ,Machine learning ,114 Physical sciences ,[SDU.ENVI]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Continental interfaces, environment ,Baseline (configuration management) ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,NET ECOSYSTEM EXCHANGE ,business.industry ,15. Life on land ,flux ,PERSPECTIVES ,[SDU]Sciences of the Universe [physics] ,13. Climate action ,040103 agronomy & agriculture ,0401 agriculture, forestry, and fisheries ,Environmental science ,Artificial intelligence ,business ,METHODOLOGY ,Agronomy and Crop Science ,computer - Abstract
Time series of wetland methane fluxes measured by eddy covariance require gap-filling to estimate daily, seasonal, and annual emissions. Gap-filling methane fluxes is challenging because of high variability and complex responses to multiple drivers. To date, there is no widely established gap-filling standard for wetland methane fluxes, with regards both to the best model algorithms and predictors. This study synthesizes results of different gap-filling methods systematically applied at 17 wetland sites spanning boreal to tropical regions and including all major wetland classes and two rice paddies. Procedures are proposed for: 1) creating realistic artificial gap scenarios, 2) training and evaluating gap-filling models without overstating performance, and 3) predicting half-hourly methane fluxes and annual emissions with realistic uncertainty estimates. Performance is compared between a conventional method (marginal distribution sampling) and four machine learning algorithms. The conventional method achieved similar median performance as the machine learning models but was worse than the best machine learning models and relatively insensitive to predictor choices. Of the machine learning models, decision tree algorithms performed the best in cross-validation experiments, even with a baseline predictor set, and artificial neural networks showed comparable performance when using all predictors. Soil temperature was frequently the most important predictor whilst water table depth was important at sites with substantial water table fluctuations, highlighting the value of data on wetland soil conditions. Raw gap-filling uncertainties from the machine learning models were underestimated and we propose a method to calibrate uncertainties to observations. The python code for model development, evaluation, and uncertainty estimation is publicly available. This study outlines a modular and robust machine learning workflow and makes recommendations for, and evaluates an improved baseline of, methane gap-filling models that can be implemented in multi-site syntheses or standardized products from regional and global flux networks (e.g., FLUXNET). ISSN:0168-1923 ISSN:1873-2240
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. Saltwater reduces potential CO2 and CH4 production in peat soils from a coastal freshwater forested wetland
- Author
-
Asko Noormets, Kevan J. Minick, John S. King, and Bhaskar Mitra
- Subjects
Hydrology ,geography ,geography.geographical_feature_category ,Marsh ,Peat ,ved/biology ,ved/biology.organism_classification_rank.species ,Wetland ,Shrub ,Salinity ,Environmental science ,Ecosystem ,Saltwater intrusion ,Coarse woody debris ,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics ,Earth-Surface Processes - Abstract
A major concern for coastal freshwater wetland function and health is the effects of saltwater intrusion on greenhouse gas production from peat soils. Coastal freshwater forested wetlands are likely to experience increased hydroperiod with rising sea level, as well as saltwater intrusion. These potential changes to wetland hydrology may also alter forested wetland structure and lead to a transition from forest to shrub/marsh wetland ecosystems. Loss of forested wetlands is already evident by dying trees and dead standing trees (“ghost” forests) along the Atlantic coast of the US, which will result in significant alterations to plant carbon (C) inputs, particularly that of coarse woody debris, to soils. We investigated the effects of salinity and wood C inputs on soils collected from a coastal freshwater forested wetland in North Carolina, USA, and incubated in the laboratory with either freshwater or saltwater (2.5 or 5.0 ppt) and with or without the additions of wood. Saltwater additions at 2.5 and 5.0 ppt reduced CO2 production by 41 % and 37 %, respectively, compared to freshwater. Methane production was reduced by 98 % (wood-free incubations) and by 75 %–87 % (wood-amended incubations) in saltwater treatments compared to the freshwater plus wood treatment. Additions of wood also resulted in lower CH4 production from the freshwater treatment and higher CH4 production from saltwater treatments compared to wood-free incubations. The δ13CH4-C isotopic signature suggested that, in wood-free incubations, CH4 produced from the freshwater treatment originated primarily from the acetoclastic pathway, while CH4 produced from the saltwater treatments originated primarily from the hydrogenotrophic pathway. These results suggest that saltwater intrusion into coastal freshwater forested wetlands will reduce CH4 production, but long-term changes in C dynamics will likely depend on how changes in wetland vegetation and microbial function influence C cycling in peat soils.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. A regional assessment of permanganate oxidizable carbon for potential use as a soil health indicator in managed pine plantations
- Author
-
Fernanda C. C. Oliveira, Allan Bacon, Thomas R. Fox, Eric J. Jokela, Michael B. Kane, Timothy A. Martin, Asko Noormets, C. Wade Ross, Jason Vogel, and Daniel Markewitz
- Subjects
History ,Polymers and Plastics ,Forestry ,Business and International Management ,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law ,Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering ,Nature and Landscape Conservation - Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. The 2013 FLEX - US Airborne Campaign at the Parker Tract Loblolly Pine Plantation in North Carolina, USA.
- Author
-
Elizabeth M. Middleton, Uwe Rascher, Lawrence A. Corp, Karl Fred Huemmrich, Bruce D. Cook, Asko Noormets, Anke Schickling, Francisco Pinto, Luis Alonso 0002, Alexander Damm, Luis Guanter, Roberto Colombo, Petya K. E. Campbell, David R. Landis, Qingyuan Zhang, Micol Rossini, Dirk Schuettemeyer, and Remo Bianchi
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. Representativeness of Eddy-Covariance flux footprints for areas surrounding AmeriFlux sites
- Author
-
Zutao Ouyang, Sébastien C. Biraud, Xiangzhong Luo, Hideki Kobayashi, Masahito Ueyama, Marcy E. Litvak, Andrew E. Suyker, Walter C. Oechel, Gregory Starr, Peter D. Blanken, Andrew D. Richardson, Prajaya Prajapati, Asko Noormets, Steven F. Oberbauer, Russell L. Scott, Sara H. Knox, Eric S. Russell, John F. Knowles, Ankur R. Desai, Sigrid Dengel, John A. Gamon, Rodrigo Vargas, Elise Pendall, Shirley A. Papuga, Hiroki Iwata, Margaret S. Torn, Ralf M. Staebler, Jiquan Chen, David Durden, Timothy J. Arkebauer, Jitendra Kumar, Heping Liu, Gil Bohrer, Tomer Duman, Paul C. Stoy, William L. Quinton, Inke Forbrich, Nathaniel A. Brunsell, Ryan C. Sullivan, Rosvel Bracho, Elyn Humphreys, Kimberly A. Novick, Jeffrey D. Wood, Christopher M. Gough, Hiroki Ikawa, Xuhui Lee, Carl J. Bernacchi, Yang Ju, Silvano Fares, W. Stephen Chan, Oliver Sonnentag, Housen Chu, T. Andrew Black, P. Y. Oikawa, David Y. Hollinger, Timothy J. Griffis, Donatella Zona, Xingyuan Chen, Stefan Metzger, D. P. Billesbach, Thomas Kolb, Manuel Helbig, Dennis D. Baldocchi, Beverly E. Law, Shannon E. Brown, M. Altaf Arain, John H. Prueger, Kenneth L. Clark, Ellen Stuart-Haëntjens, and J. William Munger
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,Atmospheric Science ,Land cover ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Eddy covariance ,Atmospheric sciences ,01 natural sciences ,Footprint ,Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences ,Landsat EVI ,Flux footprint ,Spatial analysis ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Global and Planetary Change ,Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences ,Sensor location bias ,Forestry ,Spatial representativeness ,Enhanced vegetation index ,Vegetation ,Wind direction ,Biological Sciences ,Model-data benchmarking ,Footprint Flussi carbonio ,Earth Sciences ,Environmental science ,Eddy Covariance ,Agronomy and Crop Science ,010606 plant biology & botany - Abstract
Large datasets of greenhouse gas and energy surface-atmosphere fluxes measured with the eddy-covariance technique (e.g., FLUXNET2015, AmeriFlux BASE) are widely used to benchmark models and remote-sensing products. This study addresses one of the major challenges facing model-data integration: To what spatial extent do flux measurements taken at individual eddy-covariance sites reflect model- or satellite-based grid cells? We evaluate flux footprints—the temporally dynamic source areas that contribute to measured fluxes—and the representativeness of these footprints for target areas (e.g., within 250–3000 m radii around flux towers) that are often used in flux-data synthesis and modeling studies. We examine the land-cover composition and vegetation characteristics, represented here by the Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI), in the flux footprints and target areas across 214 AmeriFlux sites, and evaluate potential biases as a consequence of the footprint-to-target-area mismatch. Monthly 80% footprint climatologies vary across sites and through time ranging four orders of magnitude from 103 to 107 m2 due to the measurement heights, underlying vegetation- and ground-surface characteristics, wind directions, and turbulent state of the atmosphere. Few eddy-covariance sites are located in a truly homogeneous landscape. Thus, the common model-data integration approaches that use a fixed-extent target area across sites introduce biases on the order of 4%–20% for EVI and 6%–20% for the dominant land cover percentage. These biases are site-specific functions of measurement heights, target area extents, and land-surface characteristics. We advocate that flux datasets need to be used with footprint awareness, especially in research and applications that benchmark against models and data products with explicit spatial information. We propose a simple representativeness index based on our evaluations that can be used as a guide to identify site-periods suitable for specific applications and to provide general guidance for data use.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
21. Heterotrophic Respiration and the Divergence of Productivity and Carbon Sequestration
- Author
-
Wen Lin, Rosvel Bracho, Daniel Markewitz, Robert O. Teskey, Kristin M. McElligott, Carlos A. Gonzalez-Benecke, John S. King, Steve McNulty, Jason G. Vogel, Brian D. Strahm, Cassandra R. Meek, Lisa J. Samuelson, Guofang Miao, Rodney E. Will, Eric J. Ward, Jinyan Yang, Eric J. Jokela, Timothy A. Martin, Asko Noormets, Jean-Christophe Domec, John R. Seiler, Ge Sun, and Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation
- Subjects
Heterotrophic respiration ,net primary production ,Primary production ,drought ,net ecosystem production ,Carbon sequestration ,carbon sequestration ,Loblolly pine ,Divergence ,heterotrophic respiration ,Geophysics ,Agronomy ,Productivity (ecology) ,fertilization ,General Earth and Planetary Sciences ,Environmental science - Abstract
Net primary productivity (NPP) and net ecosystem production (NEP) are often used interchangeably, as their difference, heterotrophic respiration (soil heterotrophic CO2 efflux, R-SH = NPP-NEP), is assumed a near-fixed fraction of NPP. Here, we show, using a range-wide replicated experimental study in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) plantations that R-SH responds differently than NPP to fertilization and drought treatments, leading to the divergent responses of NPP and NEP. Across the natural range of the species, the moderate responses of NPP (+11%) and R-SH (-7%) to fertilization combined such that NEP increased nearly threefold in ambient control and 43% under drought treatment. A 13% decline in R-SH under drought led to a 26% increase in NEP while NPP was unaltered. Such drought benefit for carbon sequestration was nearly twofold in control, but disappeared under fertilization. Carbon sequestration efficiency, NEP:NPP, varied twofold among sites, and increased up to threefold under both drought and fertilization. USDA National Institute of Food and AgricultureUnited States Department of Agriculture (USDA) [2011-68002-30185]; US Forest Service Eastern Forest Environmental Threat Assessment Center [08-JV-11330147-038]; McIntire-Stennis Project [121209 94160] Published version This study was conducted as part of The Pine Integrated Network: Education, Mitigation, and Adaptation Project (PINEMAP) that was a Coordinated Agricultural Project funded by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Award #2011-68002-30185. The authors thank Foley Timber and Land Company (Florida), Ed Hurliman (Oklahoma), and the Virginia Department of Forestry, Appomattox-Buckingham State Forest (Virginia) for providing property access to install the experiments. Partial support was provided by US Forest Service Eastern Forest Environmental Threat Assessment Center Grant 08-JV-11330147-038, and McIntire-Stennis Project 121209 94160. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Public domain – authored by a U.S. government employee
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. Environmental and Plant-Derived Controls on the Seasonality and Partitioning of Soil Respiration in an American Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis) Bioenergy Plantation Grown at Different Planting Densities
- Author
-
Suna Morkoc, Maricar Aguilos, Asko Noormets, Kevan J. Minick, Omoyemeh Ile, David A. Dickey, Deanna Hardesty, Maccoy Kerrigan, Joshua Heitman, and John King
- Subjects
soil CO2 efflux ,heterotrophic respiration ,autotrophic respiration ,short-rotation woody crops ,planting density ,soil temperature ,soil water content ,Forestry - Abstract
Bioenergy is one of the most considered alternatives to fossil fuels. Short-rotation woody crops (SRWCs) as bioenergy sources are capable of alleviating energy constraints and sequestering atmospheric CO2. However, studies investigating soil carbon (C) dynamics at SWRC plantations are scarce. We studied American sycamore (Platanus occidentalis) as a model tree species for SRWC at different planting densities ((1) 0.5 × 2.0 m (10,000 trees·ha−1 or tph), (2) 1.0 × 2.0 m (5000 tph), and (3) 2.0 × 2.0 m (2500 tph)) to examine seasonal variation in total soil respiration (Rtotal), partitioned into heterotrophic (Rh) and autotrophic (Ra) respiration, and we evaluated climatic and biological controls on soil respiration. Rtotal and Rh exhibited larger seasonal variation than Ra (p < 0.05). During the nongrowing seasons, the average Rtotal was 0.60 ± 0.21 g·C·m−2·day−1 in winter and 1.41 ± 0.73 g·C·m−2·day−1 in fall. During the growing season, Rtotal was 2–7 times higher in spring (3.49 ± 1.44 g·C·m−2·day−1) and summer (4.01 ± 1.17 g·C·m−2·day−1) than winter. Average Rtotal was 2.30 ± 0.63 g·C·m−2·day−1 in 2500 tph, 2.43 ± 0.64 g·C·m−2·day−1 in 5000 tph, and 2.41 ± 0.75 g·C·m−2·day−1 in 10,000 tph treatments. Average Rh was 1.72 ± 0.40 g·C·m−2·day−1 in 2500 tph, 1.57 ± 0.39 g·C·m−2·day−1 in 5000 tph, and 1.93 ± 0.64 g·C·m−2·day−1 in 10,000 tph, whereas Ra had the lowest rates, with 0.59 ± 0.53 g·C·m−2·day−1 in 2500 tph, 0.86 ± 0.51 g·C·m−2·d−1 in 5000 tph, and 0.48 ± 0.34 g·C·m−2·day−1 in 10,000 tph treatments. Rh had a greater contribution to Rtotal (63%–80%) compared to Ra (20%–37%). Soil temperature was highly correlated to Rtotal (R2 = 0.92) and Rh (R2 = 0.77), while the correlation to Ra was weak (R2 = 0.21). Rtotal, Rh, and Ra significantly declined with soil water content extremes (e.g., 50%). Total root biomass in winter (469 ± 127 g·C·m−2) was smaller than in summer (616 ± 161 g·C·m−2), and the relationship of total root biomass to Rtotal, Rh, and Ra was only significant during the growing seasons (R2 = 0.12 to 0.50). The litterfall in 5000 tph (121 ± 16 g DW·m−2) did not differ (p > 0.05) from the 2500 tph (108 ± 16 g DW·m−2) or 10,000 tph (132 ± 16 g DW·m−2) treatments. In no circumstances were Rtotal, Rh, and Ra significantly correlated with litterfall amount across planting densities and seasons (p > 0.05). Overall, our results show that Rtotal in American sycamore SRWC is dominated by the heterotrophic component (Rh), is strongly correlated to soil environmental conditions, and can be minimized by planting at a certain tree density (5000 tph).
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. The FLUXNET2015 dataset and the ONEFlux processing pipeline for eddy covariance data
- Author
-
Eddy Moors, Uwe Eichelmann, Christian Brümmer, Stefano Minerbi, Barbara Marcolla, Gil Bohrer, Leonardo Montagnani, Üllar Rannik, Han Dolman, Janina Klatt, Samuli Launiainen, Elizabeth A. Walter-Shea, Nina Buchmann, Hank A. Margolis, Beniamino Gioli, Peter S. Curtis, Margaret S. Torn, Gabriela Posse, Luca Belelli Marchesini, Gianluca Filippa, Kenneth J. Davis, Leiming Zhang, Alexander Graf, Ray Leuning, Andrew Feitz, Simone Sabbatini, Harry McCaughey, Werner Eugster, Juha Pekka Tuovinen, Timothy J. Arkebauer, N. N. Vygodskaya, Adam J. Liska, Rosvel Bracho, Sebastian Wolf, Marc Aubinet, Jiří Dušek, Eugénie Paul-Limoges, Christof Ammann, Daniel Berveiller, Zoran Nesic, Giacomo Nicolini, Jaclyn Hatala Matthes, Russell L. Scott, David E. Reed, Frans-Jan W. Parmentier, Changliang Shao, Penélope Serrano-Ortiz, Yingnian Li, Jason Beringer, Marc Fischer, Deb Agarwal, Rasmus Fensholt, Russell K. Monson, Agnès de Grandcourt, Stefan K. Arndt, Timo Vesala, Uta Moderow, Joseph Verfaillie, Mika Aurela, Bev Law, Nina Hinko-Najera, Taro Nakai, Richard P. Phillips, Lindsay B. Hutley, Benjamin Loubet, Michele Tomassucci, Ayumi Kotani, Hans Peter Schmid, Raimundo Cosme de Oliveira, Anatoly A. Gitelson, Domenico Vitale, Regine Maier, Caitlin E. Moore, Xiaoqin Dai, Damien Bonal, John M. Frank, Yuelin Li, Christopher M. Gough, Shijie Han, Shirley A. Papuga, Edoardo Cremonese, Shawn Urbanski, Sébastien C. Biraud, Scott D. Miller, Mana Gharun, Annalea Lohila, Ian McHugh, Giovanni Manca, Bert Gielen, Wayne S. Meyer, Pierpaolo Duce, Bruce D. Cook, Carsten Gruening, Hiroki Ikawa, B.R. Reverter, Marian Pavelka, Andrew M. S. McMillan, Gang Dong, Isaac Chini, Kimberly A. Novick, Dalibor Janouš, Anne De Ligne, E. Beamesderfer, Marty Humphrey, Virginie Moreaux, Christian Wille, Markus Hehn, Hideki Kobayashi, Allen H. Goldstein, Walter C. Oechel, Richard Silberstein, Francisco Domingo, Francesco Mazzenga, Elise Pendall, Juha Hatakka, Lutz Merbold, Xingguo Han, Daniela Famulari, Carlo Trotta, Naama Raz-Yaseef, Dario Papale, Jean Marc Ourcival, Benoit Burban, Pavel Sedlák, Diego Polidori, Asko Noormets, Huimin Wang, Birger Ulf Hansen, Thomas Grünwald, Caroline Vincke, Robert M. Stevens, Carole Coursolle, D. P. Billesbach, Karl Schneider, Guoyi Zhou, Marcin Jackowicz-Korczynski, Paul V. Bolstad, Iris Feigenwinter, Shiping Chen, Julia Boike, Ivan Schroder, D. S. Christianson, Junhui Zhang, Pierre Cellier, Catharine van Ingen, Andrej Varlagin, A. Ribeca, Claudia Consalvo, Derek Eamus, Jason Brodeur, Alan G. Barr, Denis Loustau, Andreas Ibrom, Ankur R. Desai, Andrew E. Suyker, Efrén López-Blanco, Peter Cale, Nicola Arriga, William J. Massman, Abdelrahman Elbashandy, Yoshiko Kosugi, Pauline Buysse, Cove Sturtevant, T. A. Black, Housen Chu, David R. Bowling, Sabina Dore, Albin Hammerle, Tilden P. Meyers, M. Altaf Arain, Hatim Abdalla M. ElKhidir, Ignacio Goded, Roberto Zampedri, Alessio Collalti, Torsten Sachs, Tuomas Laurila, Cristina Poindexter, E. Canfora, Alexander Knohl, Donatella Spano, Silvano Fares, Scott R. Saleska, Michiel K. van der Molen, Suzanne M. Prober, Marryanna Lion, Steven C. Wofsy, Michael L. Goulden, Matthew Northwood, Antje Lucas-Moffat, Christine Moureaux, Jean-Marc Limousin, Sara H. Knox, Damiano Gianelle, Olaf Kolle, Jørgen E. Olesen, Mikhail Mastepanov, Bernard Heinesch, Christian Bernhofer, Peter D. Blanken, Hyojung Kwon, Georg Wohlfahrt, Peili Shi, Yann Nouvellon, Allison L. Dunn, Onil Bergeron, Mauro Cavagna, Heiko Prasse, Natalia Restrepo-Coupe, Yanhong Tang, Donatella Zona, Andrew S. Kowalski, Eric Dufrêne, Kim Pilegaard, Serena Marras, Yongtao He, Brent E. Ewers, Siyan Ma, Jean Marc Bonnefond, Jonas Ardö, Ko van Huissteden, Roser Matamala, Robin Weber, Nigel J. Tapper, Humberto Ribeiro da Rocha, Eva van Gorsel, Torbern Tagesson, Frederik Schrader, Frank Tiedemann, Myroslava Khomik, Torben R. Christensen, Jonathan E. Thom, James Cleverly, Víctor Resco de Dios, Ivan Shironya, Jeffrey P. Walker, You Wei Cheah, Ana López-Ballesteros, Georgia R. Koerber, J. William Munger, Shicheng Jiang, Johannes Lüers, Bruno De Cinti, Gilberto Pastorello, David R. Cook, Werner L. Kutsch, Paul Di Tommasi, Nicolas Delpierre, Peter Isaac, Carlos Marcelo Di Bella, Jiquan Chen, Craig Macfarlane, Dennis D. Baldocchi, William Woodgate, Riccardo Valentini, Marilyn Roland, Ladislav Šigut, Tomomichi Kato, Sebastian Westermann, Ivan Mammarella, Bart Kruijt, Marta Galvagno, Marius Schmidt, Serge Rambal, J. Kurbatova, Sean P. Burns, Ettore D'Andrea, Chad Hanson, Vincenzo Magliulo, Anne Griebel, Brian D. Amiro, M. Goeckede, Enrique P. Sánchez-Cañete, Thomas L. Powell, Marcelo D. Nosetto, Cacilia Ewenz, Michael J. Liddell, Satoru Takanashi, Lukas Hörtnagl, Zulia Mayari Sanchez-Mejia, W.W.P. Jans, N. Pirk, Johan Neirynck, Rainer Steinbrecher, Lukas Siebicke, Matthias Peichl, Rachhpal S. Jassal, Costantino Sirca, Earth and Climate, Earth Sciences, Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research (INAR), INAR Physics, Micrometeorology and biogeochemical cycles, Viikki Plant Science Centre (ViPS), Ecosystem processes (INAR Forest Sciences), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory [Berkeley] (LBNL), Università degli studi della Tuscia [Viterbo], California State University [Sacramento], Michigan State University System, University of Virginia, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (MPI-BGC), Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement [Gif-sur-Yvette] (LSCE), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Chinese Academy of Sciences [Beijing] (CAS), University of Manitoba [Winnipeg], Agroscope, McMaster University [Hamilton, Ontario], Lund University [Lund], University of Nebraska–Lincoln, University of Nebraska System, University of Melbourne, University of Antwerp (UA), Université de Liège, Finnish Meteorological Institute (FMI), University of California [Berkeley] (UC Berkeley), University of California (UC), University of Saskatchewan [Saskatoon] (U of S), Peoples Friendship University of Russia [RUDN University] (RUDN), The University of Western Australia (UWA), Technische Universität Dresden = Dresden University of Technology (TU Dresden), Ecologie Systématique et Evolution (ESE), AgroParisTech-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), University of British Columbia (UBC), University of Colorado [Colorado Springs] (UCCS), Ohio State University [Columbus] (OSU), Humboldt University Of Berlin, University of Minnesota System, SILVA (SILVA), AgroParisTech-Université de Lorraine (UL)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Interactions Sol Plante Atmosphère (UMR ISPA), Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Sciences Agronomiques de Bordeaux-Aquitaine (Bordeaux Sciences Agro)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), University of Utah, University of Central Florida [Orlando] (UCF), Thunen Institute of Climate-Smart Agriculture, Department of Environmental Systems Science [ETH Zürich] (D-USYS), Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule - Swiss Federal Institute of Technology [Zürich] (ETH Zürich), Ecologie des forêts de Guyane (UMR ECOFOG), Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (Cirad)-AgroParisTech-Université de Guyane (UG)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université des Antilles (UA)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Ecologie fonctionnelle et écotoxicologie des agroécosystèmes (ECOSYS), AgroParisTech-Université Paris-Saclay-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Fondazione Edmund Mach - Edmund Mach Foundation [Italie] (FEM), Aarhus University [Aarhus], University of Technology Sydney (UTS), National Research Council of Italy | Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), Argonne National Laboratory [Lemont] (ANL), Université Laval [Québec] (ULaval), Universidade de São Paulo = University of São Paulo (USP), Pennsylvania State University (Penn State), Penn State System, Ecologie fonctionnelle et biogéochimie des sols et des agro-écosystèmes (UMR Eco&Sols), Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (Cirad)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-Institut Agro Montpellier, Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam [Amsterdam] (VU), Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas (CSIC), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [Madrid] (CSIC), Shanxi University (SXU), Worcester State University [Worcester], Czech Academy of Sciences [Prague] (CAS), Centre d’Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive (CEFE), Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 (UPVM)-École Pratique des Hautes Études (EPHE), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD [France-Sud])-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-Institut Agro - Montpellier SupAgro, Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (Cirad)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Centre international d'études supérieures en sciences agronomiques (Montpellier SupAgro)-Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier (Montpellier SupAgro), Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), UCL - SST/ELI/ELIE - Environmental Sciences, GILBERTO PASTORELLO, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, THOMAS ANDREW BLACK, University of British Columbia, PETER D. BLANKEN, University of Colorado, GIL BOHRER, Ohio State University, JULIA BOIKE, Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research / Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, PAUL V. BOLSTAD, University of Minnesota, JEAN-MARC BONNEFOND, ISPA Bordeaux Sciences Agro, DAVID R. BOWLING, University of Utah, ROSVEL BRACHO, University of Florida, JASON BRODEUR, McMaster University, CHRISTIAN BRÜMMER, Thünen Institute of Climate-Smart Agriculture, NINA BUCHMANN, ETH Zurich, BENOIT BURBAN, INRAE UMR ECOFOG, AGNES DE GRANDCOURT, UMR Eco&Sols, CIRAD, ANNE DE LIGNE, University of Liege, RAIMUNDO COSME DE OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, CPATU, HAN DOLMAN, Universiteit Amsterdam, FRANCISCO DOMINGO, CSIC, GANG DONG, Shanxi University, SABINA DORE, HydroFocus, PIERPAOLO DUCE, National Research Council of Italy, MARTA GALVAGNO, Environmental Protection Agency of Aosta Valley, MANA GHARUN, ETH Zurich, DAMIANO GIANELLE, Fondazione Edmund Mach, MARCIN JACKOWICZ-KORCZYNSKI, Lund University / Aarhus University, DALIBOR JANOUS, Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, WILMA JANS, Wageningen University and Research, RACHHPAL JASSAL, University of British Columbia, SHICHENG JIANG, Northeast Normal University, ANA LÓPEZ-BALLESTEROS, Trinity College Dublin, EFRÉN LÓPEZ-BLANCO, Aarhus University, BENJAMIN LOUBET, Université Paris-Saclay, DENIS LOUSTAU, ISPA - INRA, JOHANNES LÜERS, University of Bayreuth, JOHAN NEIRYNCK, Research Institute for Nature and Forest, ZORAN NESIC, University of British Columbia, GIACOMO NICOLINI, University of Tuscia / CMCC, ASKO NOORMETS, Texas A&M University, MATTHEW NORTHWOOD, Charles Darwin University, KIMBERLY NOVICK, Indiana University Bloomington, MARILYN ROLAND, University of Antwerp, SIMONE SABBATINI, University of Tuscia, TORSTEN SACHS, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, SCOTT R. SALESKA, University of Arizona, ENRIQUE P. SÁNCHEZ-CAÑETE, University of Granada / CEAMA-IISTA, ZULIA M. SANCHEZ-MEJIA, Instituto Tecnológico de Sonora, RAINER STEINBRECHER, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, ROBERT M. STEVENS, Sentek Pty Ltd, COVE STURTEVANT, National Ecological Observatory Network Program, ANDY SUYKER, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, TORBERN TAGESSON, Lund University / University of Copenhagen, SATORU TAKANASHI, Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, DOMENICO VITALE, University of Tuscia / CMCC, NATALIA VYGODSKAYA, Russian Academy of Sciences, JEFFREY P. WALKER, Monash University, ELIZABETH WALTER-SHEA, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, HUIMIN WANG, Chinese Academy of Sciences, ROBIN WEBER, University of California Berkeley, SEBASTIAN WESTERMANN, Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Agropecuaria (INTA), CHRISTIAN WILLE, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, STEVEN WOFSY, Harvard University, GEORG WOHLFAHRT, University of Innsbruck, SEBASTIAN WOLF, ETH Zurich, WILLIAM WOODGATE, CSIRO Land and Water, YUELIN LI, Chinese Academy of Sciences, DONATELLA ZONA, San Diego State University / University of Sheffield, DEB AGARWAL, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, SEBASTIEN BIRAUD, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, MARGARET TORN, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, DARIO PAPALE, University of Tuscia / CMCC., ALLISON DUNN, Worcester State University, JIRÍ DUSEK, Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, DEREK EAMUS, University of Technology Sydney, UWE EICHELMANN, Technische Universität Dresden, HOUSEN CHU, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, DANIELLE CHRISTIANSON, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, YOU-WEI CHEAH, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, CRISTINA POINDEXTER, California State University, JIQUAN CHEN, Michigan State University, ABDELRAHMAN ELBASHANDY, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, MARTY HUMPHREY, University of Virginia, PETER ISAAC, TERN Ecosystrem Processes, DIEGO POLIDORI, University of Tuscia / CMCC, ALESSIO RIBECA, University of Tuscia / CMCC, CATHARINE VAN INGEN, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, LEIMINGZ HANG, Chinese Academy of Sciences, BRIAN AMIRO, University of Manitoba, CHRISTOF AMMANN, Agroscope Research Institute, M. ALTAF ARAIN, McMaster University, JONAS ARDÖ, Lund University, TIMOTHY ARKEBAUER, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, STEFAN K. ARNDT, The University of Melbourne, NICOLA ARRIGA, University of Antwerp / Joint Research Centre, MARC AUBINET, University of Liege, MIKA AURELA, Finnish Meteorological Institute, DENNIS BALDOCCHI, University of California Berkeley, ALAN BARR, University of Saskatchewan / Environment and Climate Change Canada, DAMIEN BONAL, Université de Lorraine, SEAN P. BURNS, University of Colorado / National Center for Atmospheric Research, PAULINE BUYSSE, Université Paris-Saclay, PETER CALE, Australian Landscape Trust, MAURO CAVAGNA, Fondazione Edmund Mach, PIERRE CELLIER, Université Paris-Saclay, SHIPING CHEN, Chinese Academy of Sciences, ISAAC CHINI, Fondazione Edmund Mach, TORBEN R . CHRISTENSEN, Aarhus University, JAMES CLEVERLY, University of Technology Sydney, ALESSIO COLLALTI, University of Tuscia / National Research Council of Italy, CLAUDIA CONSALVO, University of Tuscia / National Research Council of Italy, BRUCE D. COOK, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, DAVID COOK, Argonne National Laboratory, CAROLE COURSOLLE, Natural Resources Canada / Université Laval, EDOARDO CREMONESE, Climate Change Unit, PETER S. CURTIS, Ohio State University, ETTORE DANDREA, National Research Council of Italy, HUMBERTO DA ROCHA, USP, XIAOQIN DAI, Chinese Academy of Sciences, KENNETH J. DAVIS, The Pennsylvania State University, BRUNO DE CINTI, National Research Council of Italy, NICOLAS DELPIERRE, Université Paris-Saclay, ANKUR R . DESAI, University of Wisconsin-Madison, CARLOS MARCELO DI BELLA, Facultad de Agronomía, UBA, Buenos Aires., PAUL DI TOMMASI, National Research Council of Italy, ERIC DUFRÊNE, Université Paris-Saclay, MARIUS SCHMIDT, Agrosphere (IBG3), HATIM ABDALLA M. ELKHIDIR, ElObeid Research Station, WERNER EUGSTER, ETH Zurich, CACILIA M. EWENZ, TERN Ecosystem Processes Central Node, BRENT EWERS, University of Wyoming, DANIELA FAMULARI, National Research Council of Italy, SILVANO FARES, National Research Council of Italy / Research Centre for Forestry and Wood, IRIS FEIGENWINTER, ETH Zurich, ANDREW FEITZ, Geoscience Australia, RASMUS FENSHOLT, University of Copenhagen, GIANLUCA FILIPPA, Environmental Protection Agency of Aosta Valley, MARC FISCHER, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, JOHN FRANK, USDA Forest Service, BERT GIELEN, University of Antwerp, BENIAMINO GIOLI, National Research Council of Italy, ANATOLY GITELSON, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, IGNACIO BALLARIN GODED, Joint Research Centre, MATHIAS GOECKEDE, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, ALLEN H. GOLDSTEIN, University of California Berkeley, CHRISTOPHER M. GOUGH, Virginia Commonwealth University, MICHAEL L. GOULDEN, University of California, ALEXANDER GRAF, Forschungszentrum Jülich, ANNE GRIEBEL, The University of Melbourne, CARSTEN GRUENING, Joint Research Centre, THOMAS GRÜNWALD, Technische Universität Dresden, ALBIN HAMMERLE, University of Innsbruck, SHIJIE HAN, Henan University / Chinese Academy of Sciences, XINGGUO HAN, Chinese Academy of Sciences, BIRGER ULF HANSEN, University of Copenhagen, CHAD HANSON, Oregon State University, JUHA HATAKKA, Finnish Meteorological Institute, YONGTAO HE, Chinese Academy of Sciences / University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, MARKUS HEHN, Technische Universität Dresden, BERNARD HEINESCH, University of Liege, NINA HINKO-NAJERA, The University of Melbourne, LUKAS HÖRTNAGL, ETH Zurich, LINDSAY HUTLEY, Charles Darwin University, ANDREAS IBROM, Technical University of Denmark, HIROKI IKAWA, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, TOMOMICHI KATO, Hokkaido University, MYROSLAVA KHOMIK, McMaster University / Geography and Environmental Management, JANINA KLATT, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, ALEXANDER KNOHL, University of Goettingen, SARA KNOX, The University of British Columbia, HIDEKI KOBAYASHI, Institute of Arctic Climate and Environment Research, GEORGIA KOERBER, University of Adelaide, OLAF KOLLE, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, YOSHIKO KOSUGI, Kyoto University, AYUMI KOTANI, Nagoya University, ANDREW KOWALSKI, University of Granada, BART KRUIJT, Wageningen University, JULIA KURBATOVA, Russian Academy of Sciences, WERNER L. KUTSCH, ICOS ERIC, HYOJUNG KWON, Oregon State University, SAMULI LAUNIAINEN, Natural Resources Institute Finland, TUOMAS LAURILA, Finnish Meteorological Institute, BEV LAW, Oregon State University, RAY LEUNING, In memoriam, YINGNIAN LI, Chinese Academy of Sciences, MICHAEL LIDDELL, James Cook University, JEAN-MARC LIMOUSIN, Univ Montpellier, KARL SCHNEIDER, University of Cologne, MARRYANNA LION, Forest Research Institute Malaysia, ADAM J. LISKA, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, ANNALEA LOHILA, Finnish Meteorological Institute / University of Helsinki, ANTJE LUCAS-MOFFAT, Thünen Institute of Climate-Smart Agriculture / Centre for Agrometeorological Research, SIYAN MA, University of California Berkeley, CRAIG MACFARLANE, CSIRO Land and Water, VINCENZO MAGLIULO, National Research Council of Italy, REGINE MAIER, ETH Zurich, IVAN MAMMARELLA, University of Helsinki, GIOVANNI MANCA, Joint Research Centre, BARBARA MARCOLLA, Fondazione Edmund Mach, HANK A . MARGOLIS, Université Laval, SERENA MARRAS, CMCC / University of Sassari, WILLIAM MASSMAN, USDA Forest Service, MIKHAIL MASTEPANOV, Aarhus University / University of Oulu, ROSER MATAMALA, Argonne National Laboratory, JACLYN HATALA MATTHES, Wellesley College, FRANCESCO MAZZENGA, National Research Council of Italy, HARRY MCCAUGHEY, Queen’s University, IAN MCHUGH, The University of Melbourne, ANDREW M. S. MCMILLAN, Environmental Analytics NZ, LUTZ MERBOLD, International Livestock Research Institute, WAYNE MEYER, University of Adelaide, TILDEN MEYERS, NOAA/OAR/Air Resources Laboratory, SCOTT D. MILLER, State University of New York at Albany, STEFANO MINERBI, Forest Department of South Tyrol, UTA MODEROW, Technische Universität Dresden, RUSSELL K. MONSON, University of Arizona, LEONARDO MONTAGNANI, Forest Department of South Tyrol / Free University of Bolzano, CAITLIN E. MOORE, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, EDDY MOORS, IHE Delft / VU Amsterdam, VIRGINIE MOREAUX, ISPA / University Grenoble Alpes, CHRISTINE MOUREAUX, University of Liege, J. WILLIAM MUNGER, Harvard University, TARO NAKAI, National Taiwan University / University of Alaska Fairbanks, MARCELO NOSETTO, Instituto de Matemática Aplicada San Luis / UNER, YANN NOUVELLON, Univ Montpellier-CIRAD-INRA-IRD-Montpellier SupAgro, WALTER OECHEL, San Diego State University / University of Exeter, JORGEN EIVIND OLESEN, Aarhus University, JEAN-MARC OURCIVAL, Univ Montpellier, SHIRLEY A. PAPUGA, Wayne State University, FRANS-JAN PARMENTIER, Lund University / University of Oslo, EUGENIE PAUL-LIMOGES, University of Zurich, MARIAN PAVELKA, Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, MATTHIAS PEICHL, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, ELISE PENDALL, Western Sydney University, RICHARD P. PHILLIPS, Indiana University Bloomington, KIM PILEGAARD, Technical University of Denmark, NORBERT PIRK, Lund University / CSIRO Land and Water, GABRIELA POSSE, Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Agropecuaria (INTA), THOMAS POWELL, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, HEIKO PRASSE, Technische Universität Dresden, SUZANNE M. PROBER, CSIRO Land and Water, SERGE RAMBAL, Univ Montpellier, ÜLLAR RANNIK, University of Helsinki, DAVID REED, Michigan State University, VICTOR RESCO DE DIOS, Western Sydney University / Southwest University of Science and Technology, NATALIA RESTREPO-COUPE, University of Arizona, BORJA R. REVERTER, Universidade Federal da Paraiba, HANS PETER SCHMID, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, FREDERIK SCHRADER, Federal Research Institute of Rural Areas, IVAN SCHRODER, Geoscience Australia, RUSSELL L. SCOTT, Southwest Watershed Research Center, PAVEL SEDLÁK, Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences / Institute of Atmospheric Physics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, PENÉLOPE SERRANO-ORTÍZ, CEAMA-IISTA / University of Granada, CHANGLIANG SHAO, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, PEILI SHI, Chinese Academy of Sciences, IVAN SHIRONYA, Russian Academy of Sciences, LUKAS SIEBICKE, Bioclimatology, University of Goettingen, LADISLAV SIGUT, Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, RICHARD SILBERSTEIN, University of Western Australia / Edith Cowan University, COSTANTINO SIRCA, CMCC / University of Sassari, DONATELLA SPANO, CMCC / University of Sassari, YANHONG TANG, Peking University, NIGEL TAPPER, Monash University, JONATHAN THOM, University of Wisconsin-Madison, FRANK TIEDEMANN, University of Goettingen, MICHELE TOMASSUCCI, University of Tuscia / Terrasystem srl, JUHA-PEKKA TUOVINEN, Finnish Meteorological Institute, SHAWN URBANSKI, Rocky Mountain Research Station, RICCARDO VALENTINI, University of Tuscia / CMCC, MICHIEL VAN DER MOLEN, Wageningen University, EVA VAN GORSEL, Australian National University Canberra, KO VAN HUISSTEDEN, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, ANDREJ VARLAGIN, Russian Academy of Sciences, JOSEPH VERFAILLIE, University of California Berkeley, TIMO VESALA, University of Helsinki, CAROLINE VINCKE, Chinese Academy of Sciences, ROBERTO ZAMPEDRI, Fondazione Edmund Mach, JUNHUI ZHANG, Chinese Academy of Sciences, GUOYI ZHOU, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, NAAMA RAZ-YASEEF, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, ERIC BEAMESDERFER, McMaster University, CARLO TROTTA, University of Tuscia, ELEONORA CANFORA, University of Tuscia / CMCC, LUCA BELELLI MARCHESINI, Fondazione Edmund Mach / RUDN University, ONIL BERGERON, Ministère du Développement durable de l’Environnement et de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques, JASON BERINGER, University of Western Australia, CHRISTIAN BERNHOFER, Technische Universität Dresden, DANIEL BERVEILLER, Université Paris-Saclay, and DAVE BILLESBACH, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
- Subjects
Meteorologie en Luchtkwaliteit ,Data Descriptor ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Settore AGR/05 - ASSESTAMENTO FORESTALE E SELVICOLTURA ,dataset provides ecosystem ,UNCERTAINTY ,Eddy covariance ,Observation météorologique ,01 natural sciences ,ecosystem-scale data ,lcsh:Science ,SITES ,Energy ,Respiration ,Statistics ,Uncertainty ,Carbon cycle ,Biological measurements ,Terrestrial biome ,RESPIRATION ,gapfilling ,[SDE]Environmental Sciences ,Assimilation ,Anhídrid carbònic ,ddc:500 ,Net ecosystem exchange ,Écosystème ,STORAGE ,Information Systems ,Statistics and Probability ,ecosystem approaches [EN] ,Meteorology and Air Quality ,ASSIMILATION ,Library and Information Sciences ,Education ,collection [EN] ,Donnée climatique ,Data collection ,Water ,15. Life on land ,Earth system science ,Climate Resilience ,Klimaatbestendigheid ,lcsh:Q ,processing ,Climate sciences ,Ecophysiology ,Storage ,Oceanography, Hydrology, Water Resources ,010501 environmental sciences ,CARBON-DIOXIDE ,ENERGY-BALANCE CLOSURE ,ddc:550 ,Échange d'énergie ,FLUXNET2015 ,Biosphere ,Energy balance closure ,fluxnet ,Computer Science Applications ,Collecte de données ,Energia ,P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières ,Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty ,INTERANNUAL VARIABILITY ,Eddy Covariance ,SDG 6 - Clean Water and Sanitation ,Engineering sciences. Technology ,Sensoriamento Remoto ,FLUX ,1171 Geosciences ,Consistency (database systems) ,eau ,Life Science ,Time series ,Remote sensing studies ,Measurement device ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Remote sensing ,Ecosystem respiration and photosynthetic ,WIMEK ,NET ECOSYSTEM EXCHANGE ,Pipeline (software) ,Environmental sciences ,Metadata ,Earth sciences ,Carbon dioxide ,13. Climate action ,Environmental science ,Probability and Uncertainty ,Water Systems and Global Change ,Dioxyde de carbone - Abstract
The FLUXNET2015 dataset provides ecosystem-scale data on CO2, water, and energy exchange between the biosphere and the atmosphere, and other meteorological and biological measurements, from 212 sites around the globe (over 1500 site-years, up to and including year 2014). These sites, independently managed and operated, voluntarily contributed their data to create global datasets. Data were quality controlled and processed using uniform methods, to improve consistency and intercomparability across sites. The dataset is already being used in a number of applications, including ecophysiology studies, remote sensing studies, and development of ecosystem and Earth system models. FLUXNET2015 includes derived-data products, such as gap-flled time series, ecosystem respiration and photosynthetic uptake estimates, estimation of uncertainties, and metadata about the measurements, presented for the frst time in this paper. In addition, 206 of these sites are for the frst time distributed under a Creative Commons (CC-BY 4.0) license. This paper details this enhanced dataset and the processing methods, now made available as open-source codes, making the dataset more accessible, transparent, and reproducible., European Union (EU), United States Department of Energy (DOE)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. COSORE: A community database for continuous soil respiration and other soil‐atmosphere greenhouse gas flux data
- Author
-
Dennis D. Baldocchi, Kadmiel Maseyk, Yuji Kominami, Nadine K. Ruehr, Patrick M. Crill, John E. Drake, Mioko Ataka, Anya M. Hopple, Haiming Kan, Samaneh Ashraf, Matthew Saunders, Zhuo Pang, Daphne Szutu, Stephanie C. Pennington, Whendee L. Silver, Scott T. Miller, Cecilio Oyonarte, David A. Lipson, Naishen Liang, Masahito Ueyama, Thomas Wutzler, Michael L. Goulden, Järvi Järveoja, Jiye Zeng, Wu Sun, Debjani Sihi, Takashi Hirano, Nina Buchmann, Amir AghaKouchak, Peter S. Curtis, Ruth K. Varner, Greg Winston, Munemasa Teramoto, Mark G. Tjoelker, Susan E. Trumbore, Kathleen Savage, Omar Gutiérrez del Arroyo, Asko Noormets, Mats Nilsson, Catriona A. Macdonald, Carolyn Monika Görres, M. Altaf Arain, Alexandre A. Renchon, Joseph Verfaillie, James W. Raich, Masahiro Takagi, Jason P. Kaye, Quan Zhang, Hamidreza Norouzi, Ulli Seibt, Melanie A. Mayes, Jinsong Wang, Juan J. Armesto, Marion Schrumpf, Tianshan Zha, Mirco Migliavacca, Chelcy Ford Miniat, Jin-Sheng He, Enrique P. Sánchez-Cañete, Michael Gavazzi, Tarek S. El-Madany, T. A. Black, H. Hughes, Elise Pendall, Christopher M. Gough, Jillian W. Gregg, Guofang Miao, Junliang Zou, Avni Malhotra, Russell L. Scott, D. S. Christianson, Marguerite Mauritz, Steve McNulty, Juying Wu, Jinshi Jian, K. C. Mathes, Tana E. Wood, Rodrigo Vargas, Jennifer Goedhart Nietz, Christoph S. Vogel, Claire L. Phillips, Mariah S. Carbone, Kentaro Takagi, Shih-Chieh Chang, Jorge F. Perez-Quezada, Richard P. Phillips, Hassan Anjileli, Eric A. Davidson, Ankur R. Desai, Christine S. O’Connell, Matthias Peichl, Bruce Osborne, Ben Bond-Lamberty, and Rachhpal S. Jassal
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Nitrous Oxide ,Climate change ,open data ,computer.software_genre ,Greenhouse gas ,010603 evolutionary biology ,01 natural sciences ,Database design ,soil respiration ,Soil respiration ,Greenhouse Gases ,Soil ,11. Sustainability ,greenhouse gases ,open science ,ddc:550 ,Environmental Chemistry ,Biology ,Ecosystem ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,General Environmental Science ,Global and Planetary Change ,Database ,Ecology ,Atmosphere ,carbon dioxide ,methane ,Respiration ,Reproducibility of Results ,15. Life on land ,Biological Sciences ,Climate Action ,Earth system science ,Ancillary data ,Chemistry ,Earth sciences ,Technical Advance ,13. Climate action ,Soil water ,Environmental science ,Ecosystem respiration ,computer ,Environmental Sciences - Abstract
Globally, soils store two to three times as much carbon as currently resides in the atmosphere, and it is critical to understand how soil greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and uptake will respond to ongoing climate change. In particular, the soil‐to‐atmosphere CO2 flux, commonly though imprecisely termed soil respiration (R S), is one of the largest carbon fluxes in the Earth system. An increasing number of high‐frequency R S measurements (typically, from an automated system with hourly sampling) have been made over the last two decades; an increasing number of methane measurements are being made with such systems as well. Such high frequency data are an invaluable resource for understanding GHG fluxes, but lack a central database or repository. Here we describe the lightweight, open‐source COSORE (COntinuous SOil REspiration) database and software, that focuses on automated, continuous and long‐term GHG flux datasets, and is intended to serve as a community resource for earth sciences, climate change syntheses and model evaluation. Contributed datasets are mapped to a single, consistent standard, with metadata on contributors, geographic location, measurement conditions and ancillary data. The design emphasizes the importance of reproducibility, scientific transparency and open access to data. While being oriented towards continuously measured R S, the database design accommodates other soil‐atmosphere measurements (e.g. ecosystem respiration, chamber‐measured net ecosystem exchange, methane fluxes) as well as experimental treatments (heterotrophic only, etc.). We give brief examples of the types of analyses possible using this new community resource and describe its accompanying R software package., Here we describe the lightweight, open source COSORE (COntinuous SOil REspiration) database and software. COSORE focuses on automated, continuous and long‐term greenhouse gas flux datasets, and is intended to serve as a community resource for earth sciences, climate change syntheses and model evaluation.
- Published
- 2020
25. Root water gates and not changes in root structure provide new insights into plant physiological responses and adaptations to drought, flooding and salinity
- Author
-
Jean-Christophe Domec, Mary Jane Carmichael, Remi Wortemann R, Guofang Miao, Anna Treado Overby, Asko Noormets, John S. King, Daniel M. Johnson, and William K. Smith
- Subjects
Salinity ,Stomatal conductance ,Water transport ,Agronomy ,biology ,Vapour Pressure Deficit ,Xylem ,Root system ,biology.organism_classification ,Acclimatization ,Taxodium - Abstract
The influence of aquaporin (AQP) activity on plant water movement remains unclear, especially in plants subject to unfavorable conditions. We applied a multitiered approach at a range of plant scales to (i) characterize the resistances controlling water transport under drought, flooding and flooding plus salinity conditions; (ii) quantify the respective effects of AQP activity and xylem structure on root (Kroot), stem (Kstem) and leaf (Kleaf) conductances, and (iii) evaluate the impact of AQP-regulated transport capacity on gas exchange. We found that drought, flooding and flooding-salinity reduced Kroot and root AQP activity in Pinus taeda, whereas Kroot of the flood-tolerant Taxodium distichum did not decline under flooding. The extent of the AQP-control of transport efficiency varied among organs and species, ranging from 35%-55% in Kroot to 10%-30% in Kstem and Kleaf. In response to treatments, AQP-mediated inhibition of Kroot rather than changes in xylem acclimation controlled the fluctuations in Kroot. The reduction in stomatal conductance and its sensitivity to vapor pressure deficit were direct responses to decreased whole-plant conductance triggered by lower Kroot and larger resistance belowground. Our results provide new mechanistic and functional insights on plant hydraulics that are essential to quantifying the influences of future stress on ecosystem function.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
26. Forest Drought Response Index (ForDRI): A New Combined Model to Monitor Forest Drought in the Eastern United States
- Author
-
Asko Noormets, Yared A. Bayissa, Getachew Demissie, Gil Bohrer, Mark Svoboda, David Y. Hollinger, Beichen Zhang, Kimberly A. Novick, Brian Fuchs, Andrew D. Richardson, Tsegaye Tadesse, Kenneth L. Clark, Brian D. Wardlow, Ankur R. Desai, and Lianhong Gu
- Subjects
010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Science ,0208 environmental biotechnology ,02 engineering and technology ,drought ,01 natural sciences ,Carbon cycle ,forest monitoring ,time series satellite data ,Bowen ratio ,carbon flux ,Forest ecology ,Dendrochronology ,Water content ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Hydrology ,Covariance ,atmospheric_science ,020801 environmental engineering ,Principal component analysis ,General Earth and Planetary Sciences ,Environmental science ,Groundwater - Abstract
Monitoring drought impacts in forest ecosystems is a complex process, because forest ecosystems are composed of different species with heterogeneous structural compositions. Even though forest drought status is a key control on the carbon cycle, very few indices exist to monitor and predict forest drought stress. The Forest Drought Indicator (ForDRI) is a new monitoring tool developed by the National Drought Mitigation Center (NDMC) to identify forest drought stress. ForDRI integrates 12 types of data, including satellite, climate, evaporative demand, ground water, and soil moisture, into a single hybrid index to estimate tree stress. The model uses Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to determine the contribution of each input variable based on its covariance in the historical records (2003–2017). A 15-year time series of 780 ForDRI maps at a weekly interval were produced. The ForDRI values at a 12.5km spatial resolution were compared with normalized weekly Bowen ratio data, a biophysically based indicator of stress, from nine AmeriFlux sites. There were strong and significant correlations between Bowen ratio data and ForDRI at sites that had experienced intense drought. In addition, tree ring annual increment data at eight sites in four eastern U.S. national parks were compared with ForDRI values at the corresponding sites. The correlation between ForDRI and tree ring increments at the selected eight sites during the summer season ranged between 0.46 and 0.75. Generally, the correlation between the ForDRI and normalized Bowen ratio or tree ring increment are reasonably good and indicate the usefulness of the ForDRI model for estimating drought stress and providing decision support on forest drought management.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
27. Spectral evidence for substrate availability rather than environmental control of methane emissions from a coastal forested wetland
- Author
-
Jean-Christophe Domec, Asko Noormets, Kevan J. Minick, Ge Sun, Prajaya Prajapati, John S. King, Steve McNulty, Guofang Miao, Bhaskar Mitra, Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, Pennsylvania State University (Penn State), Penn State System-Penn State System, Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources (North Carolina State University), North Carolina State University [Raleigh] (NC State), University of North Carolina System (UNC)-University of North Carolina System (UNC), Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, Interactions Sol Plante Atmosphère (UMR ISPA), Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Sciences Agronomiques de Bordeaux-Aquitaine (Bordeaux Sciences Agro)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Texas A&M University [College Station], Eastern Forest Environmental Threat Assessment Center, Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), University of Michigan [Ann Arbor], and University of Michigan System
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,Atmospheric Science ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Water table ,Cross-scale analysis ,Growing season ,Wetland ,Wavelet analysis ,Atmospheric sciences ,01 natural sciences ,Swamp ,Ecosystem ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Transpiration ,Global and Planetary Change ,geography ,geography.geographical_feature_category ,Forestry ,Vegetation ,15. Life on land ,Substrate (marine biology) ,Water table depth ,13. Climate action ,[SDE]Environmental Sciences ,Plant transportation ,Environmental science ,Agronomy and Crop Science ,Methane ,010606 plant biology & botany - Abstract
International audience; Knowledge of the dynamics of methane (CH4) fluxes across coastal freshwater forested wetlands, such as those found in the southeastern US remains limited. In the current study, we look at the spectral properties of ecosystem net CH4 exchange (NEECH4) time series, and its cospectral behavior with key environmental conditions (temperature (Ts5), water table (WTD) and atmospheric pressure (Pa)) and physiological fluxes (photosynthesis (GPP), transpiration (LE), sap flux (Js)) using data from a natural bottomland hardwood swamp in eastern North Carolina. NEECH4 fluxes were measured over five years (2012 – 2016) that included both wet and dry years. During the growing season, strong cospectral peaks at diurnal scale were detected between CH4 efflux and GPP, LE and Js. This suggests that the well understood diurnal cycles in the latter processes may affect CH4 production through substrate availability (GPP) and transport (sap flow and LE). The causality between different time series was established by the magnitude and consistency of phase shifts. The causal effect of Ts5 and Pa were ruled out because despite cospectral peaks with CH4, their phase relationships were inconsistent. The effect of fluctuations in WTD on CH4 efflux at synoptic scale lacked clear indications of causality, possibly due to time lags and hysteresis. The stronger cospectral peak with ecosystem scale LE rather than Js suggested that the evaporative component of LE contributed equally with plant transpiration. Hence, we conclude that while the emission of dissolved gases through plants likely takes place, it may not contribute to higher CH4 emissions as has been proposed by aerenchymatous gas transport in sedge wetlands. These findings can inform future model development by (i) highlighting the coupling between vegetation processes and CH4 emissions, and (ii) identifying specific and non-overlapping timescales for different driving factors.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
28. Long-term carbon flux and balance in managed and natural coastal forested wetlands of the Southeastern USA
- Author
-
John S. King, Steve McNulty, Ge Sun, Prajaya Prajapati, Guofang Miao, Xuefeng Li, Bhaskar Mitra, Kevan J. Minick, Asko Noormets, Maricar Aguilos, Michael Gavazzi, Jean-Christophe Domec, Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources (North Carolina State University), North Carolina State University [Raleigh] (NC State), University of North Carolina System (UNC)-University of North Carolina System (UNC), Texas A&M University [College Station], United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), North Carolina State University, Center for High Performance Simulation and Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Interactions Sol Plante Atmosphère (UMR ISPA), and Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Sciences Agronomiques de Bordeaux-Aquitaine (Bordeaux Sciences Agro)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,Atmospheric Science ,Biogeochemical cycle ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Coastal plain ,Eddy covariance ,Coastal plain forest ,Wetland ,01 natural sciences ,Sink (geography) ,Carbon fluxes ,Ecosystem ,Harvesting ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Forested wetlands ,Global and Planetary Change ,geography ,geography.geographical_feature_category ,Managed forests ,Drought ,Forestry ,15. Life on land ,[SDE]Environmental Sciences ,Environmental science ,Ecosystem respiration ,Cycling ,Agronomy and Crop Science ,010606 plant biology & botany - Abstract
Wetlands store large carbon (C) stocks and play important roles in biogeochemical C cycling. However, the effects of environmental and anthropogenic pressures on C dynamics in lower coastal plain forested wetlands in the southern U.S. are not well understood. We established four eddy flux stations in two post-harvest and newly-planted loblolly pine plantations (YP2–6, 2–6 yrs old; YP2–8, 2–8 yrs old), a rotation-aged loblolly pine plantations (MP, 15–27 yrs old), and a mixed bottomland hardwood forest (BHF, >100 yrs old) in the lower coastal plain of North Carolina, USA. We analyzed the gross primary productivity (GPP), ecosystem respiration (RE) and net ecosystem exchange (NEE) for age-related trends, interannual variability in response to climate forcing, and management-related disturbances from 2005 – 2017. For the first few years after being harvested, pine plantations were net C sources (NEE = 1133 and 897 g C m–2 yr–1 in YP2–6 and YP2–8, respectively). The MP was a strong C sink (–369 to –1131 g C m–2 yr–1) over the entire study period. In contrast, BHF was a C source (NEE = 87 g C m–2 yr–1 to 759 g C m–2 yr–1) in most years, although in the first year it did show a net C uptake (NEE = –368 g C m–2 yr–1). The source activity of BHF may have been related to increasing overstory tree mortality and diameter growth suppression. Decreases in relative extractable water in pine plantations enhanced GPP and RE. Pine plantations regained status as C sinks 5–8 years after harvest and recovered C equivalent to post-harvest losses at 8–14 years. Thus, coastal pine plantations have a net C uptake for only about half the 25-year rotation period, suggesting that they have decreased climate mitigation potential in comparison to protecting primary forests. However, primary forests in this area may be vulnerable to ecosystem transition, and subsequent C loss, due to the changing environmental conditions at the land-ocean interface.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
29. Microtopography Alters Hydrology, Phenol Oxidase Activity and Nutrient Availability in Organic Soils of a Coastal Freshwater Forested Wetland
- Author
-
Bhaskar Mitra, Asko Noormets, A. M. Kelley, Kevan J. Minick, Guofang Miao, Xuefeng Li, and John S. King
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,Hydrology ,Nutrient cycle ,geography ,geography.geographical_feature_category ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Ecology ,010604 marine biology & hydrobiology ,Wetland ,Soil carbon ,01 natural sciences ,Nutrient ,Soil water ,Environmental Chemistry ,Environmental science ,Ecosystem ,Sample collection ,Water content ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,General Environmental Science - Abstract
Hummock-hollow microtopography is a unique feature of wetland ecosystems, but our understanding of its effects on soil carbon and nutrient cycling is limited. We investigated effects of microtopography on hydrology, phenol oxidase activity (POX) and nutrient availability in a freshwater forested wetland of coastal North Carolina. Water table depth (WTD) was measured from September 2012 to August 2013. Ion exchange probes were used to measure nutrient concentrations prior to soil sample collection in August 2013. WTD fluctuated seasonally with maximum and minimum WTD resulting in 92% (September 2012) to 8% (June 2013) of the site in flooded and non-flooded conditions, respectively. Hummocks had greater POX activity (12 ± 2.8 μmol g−1 h−1) compared to hollows (4 ± 0.7 μmol g−1 h−1) and greater concentrations of potassium and sulfur, but lower concentrations of calcium, iron, zinc, boron, and lead. POX was negatively correlated with soil water content. Higher enzyme activity in hummocks likely drives greater rates of carbon and nutrient cycling compared to hollows, consistent with observations that hummocks are hotspots for CO2 fluxes. Microtopography altered site-level hydrologic conditions, phenol oxidase activity and nutrient availability with important implications for understanding carbon and nutrient cycling in forested wetlands and response to changes in hydrology.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
30. Understanding coastal wetland hydrology with a new regional‐scale, process‐based hydrological model
- Author
-
Ge Sun, Wenhong Li, Yu Zhang, Ryan E. Emanuel, Guofang Miao, John S. King, and Asko Noormets
- Subjects
Hydrology ,geography ,geography.geographical_feature_category ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Scale (ratio) ,Coastal plain ,Erosion control ,0208 environmental biotechnology ,Climate change ,Wetland ,02 engineering and technology ,01 natural sciences ,020801 environmental engineering ,Hydrology (agriculture) ,Environmental science ,Saltwater intrusion ,Groundwater ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Water Science and Technology - Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
31. Assessing the interplay between canopy energy balance and photosynthesis with cellulose δ18O: large-scale patterns and independent ground-truthing
- Author
-
Asko Noormets, Sean P. Burns, Michael L. Goulden, Brent R. Helliker, Jiquan Chen, Paul V. Bolstad, Xin Song, Eugenie Euskirchenn, Kenneth L. Clark, Timothy A. Martin, Ankur R. Desai, J. William Munger, S. C. Wofsy, David Y. Hollinger, and Dennis D. Baldocchi
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,Canopy ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,δ18O ,Taiga ,Primary production ,Oxygen isotope ratio cycle ,Biology ,Atmospheric sciences ,01 natural sciences ,Boreal ,Temperate climate ,Ecosystem ,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics ,010606 plant biology & botany ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences - Abstract
There are few whole-canopy or ecosystem scale assessments of the interplay between canopy temperature and photosynthesis across both spatial and temporal scales. The stable oxygen isotope ratio (δ18O) of plant cellulose can be used to resolve a photosynthesis-weighted estimate of canopy temperature, but the method requires independent confirmation. We compare isotope-resolved canopy temperatures derived from multi-year homogenization of tree cellulose δ18O to canopy-air temperatures weighted by gross primary productivity (GPP) at multiple sites, ranging from warm temperate to boreal and subalpine forests. We also perform a sensitivity analysis for isotope-resolved canopy temperatures that showed errors in plant source water δ18O lead to the largest errors in canopy temperature estimation. The relationship between isotope-resolved canopy temperatures and GPP-weighted air temperatures was highly significant across sites (p
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
32. Corrigendum to: Using δ13C and δ18O to analyze loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) response to experimental drought and fertilization
- Author
-
Wen Lin, Jean-Christophe Domec, Eric J Ward, John Marshall, John S King, Marshall A Laviner, Thomas R Fox, Jason B West, Ge Sun, Steve McNulty, and Asko Noormets
- Subjects
Physiology ,Plant Science - Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
33. Wetland microtopography alters response of potential net CO2 and CH4 production to temperature and moisture: Evidence from a laboratory experiment
- Author
-
Kevan J. Minick, Xuefeng Li, Prajaya Prajapati, Milan Fischer, John S. King, Maricar Aguilos, Asko Noormets, and Bhaskar Mitra
- Subjects
geography ,geography.geographical_feature_category ,Peat ,Nutrient ,Moisture ,Environmental chemistry ,Soil water ,Q10 ,Soil Science ,Environmental science ,Wetland ,Water content ,Mineralization (biology) - Abstract
Coastal wetlands store significant amounts of carbon (C) belowground, which may be altered through effects of rising temperature and changing hydrology on CO2 and CH4 fluxes and related microbial activities. Wetland microtopography (hummock-hollow) also plays a critical role in mediating plant growth, microbial activity, and thus cycling of C and nutrients and may interact with rising seas to influence coastal wetland C dynamics. Recent evidence suggests that CH4 production in oxygenated surface soils of freshwater wetlands may contribute substantially to global CH4 production, but comprehensive studies linking potential CH4 production to environmental and microbial variables in temperate freshwater forested wetlands are lacking. This study investigated effects of temperature, moisture, and microtopography on potential net CO2 and CH4 production and extracellular enzyme activity (β-glucosidase, xylosidase, phenol oxidase, and peroxidase) in peat soils collected from a freshwater forested wetland in coastal North Carolina, USA. Soils were retrieved from three microsites (hummock, hollow, and subsurface peat soils (approximately 20–40 cm below surface)) and incubated at two temperatures (27 °C and 32 °C) and soil water contents (65% and 100% water holding capacity (WHC)). Hummocks had the highest cumulative potential net CO2 (13.7 ± 0.90 mg CO2-C g soil−1) and CH4 (1.8 ± 0.42 mg CH4-C g soil−1) production and enzyme activity, followed by hollows (8.7 ± 0.91 mg CO2-C g soil−1 and 0.5 ± 0.12 mg CH4-C g soil−1) and then subsurface soils (5.7 ± 0.70 mg CO2-C g soil−1 and 0.04 ± 0.019 mg CH4-C g soil−1). Fully saturated soils had lower potential net CO2 production (50–80%) and substantially higher potential net CH4 production compared to non-saturated soils (those incubated at 65% WHC). Soils incubated at 32 °C increased potential net CO2 (24–34%) and CH4 (56–404%) production under both soil moisture levels compared to those incubated at 27 °C. The Q10 values for potential net CO2 and CH4 production ranged from 1.5 to 2.3 and 3.3–8.8, respectively, and did not differ between any microsites or soil water content. Enrichment of δ13CO2-C was found in saturated soils from all microsites (−24.4 to − 29.7 ‰) compared to non-saturated soils (−31.1 to − 32.4 ‰), while δ13CH4-C ranged from −62 to −55‰ in saturated soils. Together, the CO2 and CH4 δ13C data suggest that acetoclastic methanogenesis is an important pathway for CH4 production in these wetlands. A positive relationship (Adj. R2 = 0.40) between peroxidase activity and CH4 production was also found, indicating that peroxidase activity may be important in providing fermented C substrates to acetoclastic methanogenic communities and contribute to anaerobic C mineralization. These results suggest that changes in temperature and hydrology could stimulate CO2 and CH4 emissions from surface hummock soils, and to a lesser extent from hollow soils, and provide preliminary evidence that hummocks may be a spatially important and unrecognized hotspot for CH4 production.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
34. Hydrology and microtopography control carbon dynamics in wetlands: Implications in partitioning ecosystem respiration in a coastal plain forested wetland
- Author
-
Carl C. Trettin, John S. King, Steve McNulty, Asko Noormets, Ge Sun, Jean-Christophe Domec, Montserrat Fuentes, Guofang Miao, Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University [Raleigh] (NC State), University of North Carolina System (UNC)-University of North Carolina System (UNC), Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois System, Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, Pennsylvania State University (Penn State), Penn State System-Penn State System, Interactions Sol Plante Atmosphère (UMR ISPA), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Sciences Agronomiques de Bordeaux-Aquitaine (Bordeaux Sciences Agro), Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University [Durham], North Carolina State University, Center for High Performance Simulation and Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, and United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,Atmospheric Science ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Coastal plain ,Water table ,[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio] ,microtopography ,Eddy covariance ,hydrology ,Wetland ,01 natural sciences ,Hydrology (agriculture) ,eddy covariance flux ,Ecosystem ,14. Life underwater ,chamber flux ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Hydrology ,Global and Planetary Change ,geography ,geography.geographical_feature_category ,Forestry ,15. Life on land ,Water level ,13. Climate action ,[SDE]Environmental Sciences ,Environmental science ,Ecosystem respiration ,forested wetland ,Agronomy and Crop Science ,respiration ,010606 plant biology & botany - Abstract
International audience; Wetlands store a disproportionately large fraction of organic carbon relative to their areal coverage, and thus play an important role in global climate mitigation. As destabilization of these stores through land use or environmental change represents a significant climate feedback, it is important to understand the functional regulation of respiratory processes that catabolize them. In this study, we established an eddy covariance flux tower project in a coastal plain forested wetland in North Carolina, USA, and measured total ecosystem respiration (R-e) over three years (2009-2011). We evaluated the magnitude and variability of three respiration components-belowground (R-s), coarse woody debris (R-CWD), and aboveground plant (R-asp) respiration at the ecosystem scale, by accounting microtopographic variation for upscaling and constraining the mass balance with R-e. Strong hydrologic control was detected for 12, and R-CWD,, whereas R-asp and R-e were relatively insensitive to water table fluctuations. In a relatively dry year (2010), this forested wetland respired a total of about 2000 g CO2-C m(-2)y(-1) annually, 51% as R-s, 37% as R-agp, and 12% as R-CWD. During non-flooded periods R-s contributed up to 57% of R-e and during flooded periods R-asp contributed up to 69%. The contribution of R-e to R-e increased by 2.4% for every cm of decrease in water level at intermediate water table level, and was nearly constant when flooded or when the water level more than 15 cm below ground. The contrasting sensitivity of different respiration components highlights the need for explicit consideration of this dynamic in ecosystem and Earth System Models.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
35. Leveraging 35 years of Pinus taeda research in the southeastern US to constrain forest carbon cycle predictions: regional data assimilation using ecosystem experiments
- Author
-
Timothy A. Martin, David A. Sampson, Robert O. Teskey, Harold E. Burkhart, Carlos A. Gonzalez-Benecke, A. Jersild, Heather Dinon-Aldridge, Jean-Christophe Domec, Randolph H. Wynne, Asko Noormets, Eric J. Ward, Timothy R. Fox, R. Quinn Thomas, Evan B. Brooks, Timothy J. Albaugh, Department of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation [Blacksburg], Virginia Tech [Blacksburg], Climate Change Science Institute [Oak Ridge] (CCSI), Oak Ridge National Laboratory [Oak Ridge] (ORNL), UT-Battelle, LLC-UT-Battelle, LLC, State Climate Office of North Carolina, North Carolina State University [Raleigh] (NC State), University of North Carolina System (UNC)-University of North Carolina System (UNC), Interactions Sol Plante Atmosphère (UMR ISPA), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Sciences Agronomiques de Bordeaux-Aquitaine (Bordeaux Sciences Agro), Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University [Durham], Department of Forest Engineering, Resources and Management, Oregon State University (OSU), School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida [Gainesville] (UF), Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources (North Carolina State University), Decision Center for a Desert City, Arizona State University [Tempe] (ASU), Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia [USA], Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation, Interactions Sol Plante Atmosphère (ISPA), and University of Florida [Gainesville]
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,loblolly pine ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio] ,05 Environmental Sciences ,lcsh:Life ,Atmospheric sciences ,01 natural sciences ,Data assimilation ,FERTILIZATION ,Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences ,Geosciences, Multidisciplinary ,2. Zero hunger ,GROWTH-RESPONSES ,Carbon dioxide in Earth's atmosphere ,changement climatique ,Ecology ,RADIATION-USE EFFICIENCY ,lcsh:QE1-996.5 ,WATER AVAILABILITY ,Geology ,forest ecosystem ,Physical Sciences ,Life Sciences & Biomedicine ,cycle du carbone ,MODEL-DATA FUSION ,04 Earth Sciences ,CANOPY STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE ,Climate change ,Environmental Sciences & Ecology ,STREAMS ,assimilation de données ,010603 evolutionary biology ,THROUGHFALL REDUCTION ,Carbon cycle ,lcsh:QH540-549.5 ,carbon cycle ,Forest ecology ,LOBLOLLY-PINE ,3-PG MODEL ,Ecosystem ,global change ,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Earth-Surface Processes ,écosystème forestier ,Hydrology ,Global change ,06 Biological Sciences ,15. Life on land ,lcsh:Geology ,lcsh:QH501-531 ,pinus taeda ,13. Climate action ,Environmental science ,SOUTHERN UNITED-STATES ,lcsh:Ecology - Abstract
Predicting how forest carbon cycling will change in response to climate change and management depends on the collective knowledge from measurements across environmental gradients, ecosystem manipulations of global change factors, and mathematical models. Formally integrating these sources of knowledge through data assimilation, or model–data fusion, allows the use of past observations to constrain model parameters and estimate prediction uncertainty. Data assimilation (DA) focused on the regional scale has the opportunity to integrate data from both environmental gradients and experimental studies to constrain model parameters. Here, we introduce a hierarchical Bayesian DA approach (Data Assimilation to Predict Productivity for Ecosystems and Regions, DAPPER) that uses observations of carbon stocks, carbon fluxes, water fluxes, and vegetation dynamics from loblolly pine plantation ecosystems across the southeastern US to constrain parameters in a modified version of the Physiological Principles Predicting Growth (3-PG) forest growth model. The observations included major experiments that manipulated atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration, water, and nutrients, along with nonexperimental surveys that spanned environmental gradients across an 8.6 × 105 km2 region. We optimized regionally representative posterior distributions for model parameters, which dependably predicted data from plots withheld from the data assimilation. While the mean bias in predictions of nutrient fertilization experiments, irrigation experiments, and CO2 enrichment experiments was low, future work needs to focus modifications to model structures that decrease the bias in predictions of drought experiments. Predictions of how growth responded to elevated CO2 strongly depended on whether ecosystem experiments were assimilated and whether the assimilated field plots in the CO2 study were allowed to have different mortality parameters than the other field plots in the region. We present predictions of stem biomass productivity under elevated CO2, decreased precipitation, and increased nutrient availability that include estimates of uncertainty for the southeastern US. Overall, we (1) demonstrated how three decades of research in southeastern US planted pine forests can be used to develop DA techniques that use multiple locations, multiple data streams, and multiple ecosystem experiment types to optimize parameters and (2) developed a tool for the development of future predictions of forest productivity for natural resource managers that leverage a rich dataset of integrated ecosystem observations across a region.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
36. Deriving the sensible heat flux from the air temperature time-series through the flux-variance and the surface renewal methods
- Author
-
Jean-Christophe Domec, Matěj Orság, Gabriel G. Katul, Milan Fischer, Asko Noormets, Gabriela Pozníková, John S. King, and Miroslav Trnka
- Subjects
Surface (mathematics) ,Series (mathematics) ,Air temperature ,Flux ,Environmental science ,Variance (accounting) ,Sensible heat ,Atmospheric sciences - Abstract
Eddy covariance (EC) has become the standard method for determining energy fluxes at the soil-plant-atmosphere interface. However, the cost and complexity of EC often limit its widespread deployment, and therefore, alternatives need to be considered. Here, two alternative methods, flux-variance (FV) and surface renewal (SR), are evaluated in quantifying sensible heat flux at three sites representing agricultural (wheat field, straw and bare soil), agroforestry (pine-switchgrass intercroping) and natural forested wetland (mixed conifer-deciduous wetland forest) systems that span a broad range of canopy height and structural complexity. By considering the position of the sensors with respect to canopy, the measurements at these three sites were carried out in the atmospheric surface layer, roughness layer, and roughness to surface transitional layer, respectively. Since the introduction of FV and SR, several versions of these methods have been proposed, with significantly differing perspectives and assumptions. Until now, the differences between the methods have not been fully standardized or clarified. In principle, both methods require the monitoring of high frequency (e.g. 10 Hz) air temperature variation while some approaches require additional wind velocity measurements. This presentation provides an overview of the FV and SR approaches, including new perspectives as well as identifies the common framework of the methods rather than carrying out their mere comparison. We show that the frequently reported need for the calibration (e.g. against EC) cannot be fully overcome. However, it can be put in a more universal framework where the parameters of both methods requiring calibration are represented by joint physically based parameters such as surface aerodynamic properties rather than similarity constants in the case of FV or the mean volume over the area of the air parcels in the case of SR. After the selection of the most reliable approaches, regression analyses against EC shows that both methods can estimate sensible heat flux with slopes within ±10 % from unity and R2 >0.9 across all the three sites. The best performance of both FV and SR was at the agricultural field, where the measurements are well in the surface layer while the worst in the case of the tall forest where the measurements are still in the roughness sublayer and the roughness layer depth (with its inherent uncertainty) needs to be taken into account in the calculations. We conclude there may be opportunities to fill gaps in knowledge of ecosystem energy balance at substantial cost-savings in specialized circumstances where EC may not be appropriate using both FV and SR methods.Acknowledgement: This study was conducted with support of SustES - Adaptation strategies for sustainable ecosystem services and food security under adverse environmental conditions (CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000797) and USDA NIFA-AFRI Sustainable Bioenergy Program, 2011-67009-20089, Loblolly pine-switch grass intercropping for sustainable timber and biofuels production in the Southeastern United States. Funding for AmeriFlux core site US-NC4 (natural forested wetland) was provided by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
37. Remote Sensing of Environment
- Author
-
Ge Sun, Christopher Hain, Asko Noormets, Yun Yang, Martha C. Anderson, Feng Gao, Liang Sun, Randolph H. Wynne, Valerie A. Thomas, and Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation
- Subjects
Stand development ,Time series ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,0208 environmental biotechnology ,Forest management ,Soil Science ,02 engineering and technology ,Land cover ,01 natural sciences ,Water balance ,Evapotranspiration ,Forest ecology ,Forest ,Computers in Earth Sciences ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Remote sensing ,Hydrology ,Drought ,Evapotranspiration (ET) ,Geology ,Disturbance ,Data fusion ,020801 environmental engineering ,Disturbance (ecology) ,Environmental science ,Moderate-resolution imaging spectroradiometer ,Landsat - Abstract
Forest ecosystem services such as clean water, wildlife habitat, and timber supplies are increasingly threatened by drought and disturbances (e.g., harvesting, fires and conversion to other uses), which can have great impacts on stand development and water balance. Improved understanding of the hydrologic response of forested systems to drought and disturbance at spatiotemporal resolutions commensurate with these impacts is important for effective forest management. Evapotranspiration (ET) is a key hydrologic variable in assessing forest functioning and health, but it remains a challenge to accurately quantify ET at landscape scales with the spatial and temporal detail required for effective decision-making. In this study, we apply a multi-sensor satellite data fusion approach to study the response of forest ET to drought and disturbance over a 7-year period. This approach combines Landsat and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) ET product time series retrieved using a surface energy balance model to generate a multi-year ET datacube at 30-m resolution and daily timesteps. The study area (similar to 900 km(2)) contains natural and managed forest as well as croplands in the humid lower coastal plains in North Carolina, USA, and the simulation period from 2006 to 2012 includes both normal and severe drought conditions. The model results were evaluated at two AmeriFlux sites (US-NC2 and US-NC1) dominated by a mature and a recently clearcut pine plantation, respectively, and showed good agreement with observed fluxes, with 813% relative errors at monthly timesteps. Changes in water use patterns in response to drought and disturbance as well as forest stand aging were assessed using the remotely sensed time series describing total evapotranspiration, the transpiration (T) component of ET, and a moisture stress metric given by the actual-to-reference ET ratio (f(RET)). Analyses demonstrate differential response to drought by land cover type and stand age, with larger impacts on total ET observed in young pine stands than in mature stands which have substantially deeper rooting systems. Transpiration flux shows a clear ascending trend with the growth of young pine plantations, while stand thinning within the plantation leads to decreases in both remotely sensed leaf area index and T, as expected. Time series maps of f(RET) anomalies at 30-m resolution capture signals of drought, disturbance and the subsequent recovery after clearcut at the stand scale and may be an effective indicator for water use change detection and monitoring in forested landscapes. National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNational Aeronautics & Space Administration (NASA) [NNH14AX36I] This work was funded in part by a grant from National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNH14AX36I). We thank the Weyerhaeuser Company for providing stand age data. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
- Published
- 2020
38. Tidal Wetland Gross Primary Production Across the Continental United States, 2000–2019
- Author
-
John S. King, Hafsah Nahrawi, Inke Forbrich, Ken W. Krauss, Jack A. Hutchings, J. Ruiz-Plancarte, Rodrigo Vargas, Merryl Alber, Guofang Miao, A. Jaimes, Monique Y. Leclerc, Raymond G. Najjar, Kevin D. Kroeger, Alma Vázquez-Lule, Jose D. Fuentes, Camille L. Stagg, A.L. Hinson, Jordan G. Barr, Brian A. Bergamaschi, Bhaskar Mitra, Georgianne W. Moore, Thomas S. Bianchi, Rusty A. Feagin, Eric J. Ward, Sara H. Knox, Lisamarie Windham-Myers, Thomas P. Huff, Karina V. R. Schäfer, and Asko Noormets
- Subjects
Hydrology ,Atmospheric Science ,Global and Planetary Change ,geography ,geography.geographical_feature_category ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,0207 environmental engineering ,Primary production ,Wetland ,Estuary ,02 engineering and technology ,01 natural sciences ,Blue carbon ,Environmental Chemistry ,Environmental science ,020701 environmental engineering ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,General Environmental Science - Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
39. Productivity of Low-Input Short-Rotation Coppice American Sycamore (Platanus Occidentalis L.) as a Bioenergy Feedstock Over Two Rotation Cycles: Effects of Different Planting Densities
- Author
-
Omoyemeh Jennifer Ile, Maricar Aguilos, Suna Morkoc, Kevan Minick, Jean-Christophe Domec, Asko Noormets, and John S. King
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
40. Effects of microtopography on absorptive and transport fine root biomass, necromass, production, mortality and decomposition in a coastal freshwater forested wetland, southeastern USA
- Author
-
Ge Sun, Jean-Christophe Domec, Kevan J. Minick, Jordan Luff, Asko Noormets, Bhaskar Mitra, Steven G. McNulty, John S. King, Xuefeng Li, Guofang Miao, Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University [Raleigh] (NC State), University of North Carolina System (UNC)-University of North Carolina System (UNC), Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Vermont [Burlington], Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, Pennsylvania State University (Penn State), Penn State System-Penn State System, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign (UIUC), University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign [Urbana], University of Illinois System-University of Illinois System, Interactions Sol Plante Atmosphère (UMR ISPA), Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Sciences Agronomiques de Bordeaux-Aquitaine (Bordeaux Sciences Agro)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Eastern Forest Environmental Threat Assessment Center, and US Forest Service
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,Peat ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Coastal plain ,[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio] ,microtopography ,necromass ,Wetland ,010603 evolutionary biology ,01 natural sciences ,fine root ,Sink (geography) ,Root mass ,Environmental Chemistry ,Muck ,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics ,Sea level ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,2. Zero hunger ,geography ,geography.geographical_feature_category ,decomposition ,Ecology ,biomass ,15. Life on land ,mortality ,6. Clean water ,Agronomy ,13. Climate action ,[SDE]Environmental Sciences ,Environmental science ,production ,Cycling ,forested wetland - Abstract
International audience; Forested wetlands are an important carbon (C) sink. Fine roots (diameter
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
41. Saltwater reduces CO2 and CH4 production in organic soils from a coastal freshwater forested wetland
- Author
-
Asko Noormets, Kevan J. Minick, John S. King, and Bhaskar Mitra
- Subjects
Hydrology ,geography ,Marsh ,geography.geographical_feature_category ,ved/biology ,ved/biology.organism_classification_rank.species ,Wetland ,Shrub ,Salinity ,Soil water ,Environmental science ,Ecosystem ,Coarse woody debris ,Saltwater intrusion - Abstract
A major concern for coastal freshwater wetland function and health is saltwater intrusion and the potential impacts on greenhouse gas production. Coastal freshwater wetlands are likely to experience increased hydroperiod with rising sea level, as well as saltwater intrusion. These potential changes to wetland hydrology may also alter forest structure and lead to a transition from forest to shrub/marsh wetland ecosystems. Loss of forested wetlands is already evident by dying trees and dead standing trees ("ghost" forests) along the Atlantic Coast of the US, which will result in significant alterations to plant carbon (C) inputs, particularly that of coarse woody debris, to soils. We investigated the effects of salinity and wood C inputs on soils collected from a coastal freshwater forested wetland in North Carolina, USA, and incubated in the laboratory with either freshwater or saltwater (2.5 or 5.0 ppt) and with or without the additions of wood. Saltwater additions at 2.5 ppt and 5.0 ppt reduced CO2 production by 41 and 37 %, respectively, compared to freshwater. Methane production was reduced by 98 % (wood-free incubations) and by 75–87 % (wood-amended incubations) in saltwater treatments compared to the freshwater treatment. Additions of wood resulted in lower CH4 production from the freshwater treatment and higher CH4 production from saltwater treatments compared to wood-free incubations. The δ13CH4-C isotopic signature indicated that in wood-free incubations, CH4 produced from the freshwater treatment was from the acetoclastic pathway, while CH4 produced from the saltwater treatments was more likely from the hydrogenotrophic pathway. These results suggest that saltwater intrusion into subtropical coastal freshwater forested wetlands will reduce CH4 fluxes, but long-term changes in C dynamics will likely depend on how changes in wetland vegetation and microbial function influences C inputs to the soil.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
42. Water Table Drawdown Alters Soil and Microbial Carbon Pool Size and Isotope Composition in Coastal Freshwater Forested Wetlands
- Author
-
Bhaskar Mitra, John S. King, Xuefeng Li, Asko Noormets, and Kevan J. Minick
- Subjects
Hydrology ,Global and Planetary Change ,geography ,Peat ,geography.geographical_feature_category ,Ecology ,Water table ,Forestry ,Wetland ,Soil carbon ,Environmental Science (miscellaneous) ,Hydrology (agriculture) ,Soil water ,Environmental science ,Soil horizon ,Ecosystem ,Nature and Landscape Conservation - Abstract
Loss of coastal wetlands is occurring at an increasingly rapid rate due to drainage of these wetlands for alternative land-uses, which also threatens carbon (C) storage in these C-rich ecosystems. Wetland drainage results in water table drawdown and increased peat aeration, which enhances decomposition of previously stabilized peat and changes stable C isotope profiles with soil depth. The effect of water table drawdown on the pool size and δ13C signature of plant C, soil organic C (SOC) and microbial biomass C (MBC) across a range of organic and mineral soils has not previously been reported in coastal freshwater forested wetlands. To this end, litter, roots, and soils were collected from organic and mineral soil horizons in two coastal freshwater forested wetlands in North Carolina with different hydrological regimes: 1) a natural bottomland hardwood forest (natural); and 2) a ditched and drained, intensively-managed wetland for loblolly pine silviculture (managed). We found that hydrology and soil horizon, and to a lesser degree micro-topography, was important in shaping observed differences in size and 13C signature of soil and microbial pools between the natural and managed wetland. The natural wetland had higher SOC and MBC concentrations in the litter, surface organic, and mineral horizons compared to the managed wetland. In the managed wetland, 13C of SOC was enriched across most of the soil profile (Oa and mineral soil horizons) compared to the natural wetland, suggesting enhanced decomposition and incorporation of microbially-derived inputs to soils. Root C concentration decreased with soil depth, while root 13C signature became enriched with soil depth. In the litter and Oe horizon of the natural wetland, MBC was higher and 13C of MBC and SOC was enriched in hummocks compared to hollows. The 13C of MBC and SOC tended to be enriched in upper soil horizons and depleted in lower soil horizons, particularly in the managed wetland. We conclude that drainage of these coastal wetlands has enhanced the breakdown of previously stabilized C and has the potential to alter regional C storage, feedbacks to climate warming, and ecosystem responses to changing environmental conditions.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
43. Conversion of natural forests to managed forest plantations decreases tree resistance to prolonged droughts
- Author
-
Andrew Radecki, Dave M. Bell, Ge Sun, Jean-Christophe Domec, Sari Palmroth, A. Christopher Oishi, Asko Noormets, Michael Gavazzi, Guofang Miao, John S. King, Daniel M. Johnson, Steve McNulty, Eric J. Ward, Interactions Sol Plante Atmosphère (UMR ISPA), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Sciences Agronomiques de Bordeaux-Aquitaine (Bordeaux Sciences Agro), Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University [Raleigh] (NC State), University of North Carolina System (UNC)-University of North Carolina System (UNC), Southern Research Station, United States Department of Agriculture Forest Services, Nicholas School of the Environment and Earth Sciences, Duke University [Durham], University of North Carolina System (UNC), Pacific Northwest Research Station, United States Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Department of Forest, Rangeland and Fire Sciences, University of Idaho [Moscow, USA], Asko Noormets, and Yann Nouvellon
- Subjects
roots ,natural stands ,Vapour Pressure Deficit ,Agroforestry ,[SDE.MCG]Environmental Sciences/Global Changes ,Forest management ,Xylem ,Forestry ,drought ,15. Life on land ,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law ,transpiration ,cavitation ,Agronomy ,Soil water ,Environmental science ,Ecosystem ,[SDE.BE]Environmental Sciences/Biodiversity and Ecology ,Water content ,Water use ,pine ,Nature and Landscape Conservation ,Transpiration - Abstract
International audience; Throughout the southern US, past forest management practices have replaced large areas of native forests with loblolly pine plantations and have resulted in changes in forest response to extreme weather conditions. However, uncertainty remains about the response of planted versus natural species to drought across the geographical range of these forests. Taking advantage of a cluster of unmanaged stands (85-130 year-old hardwoods) and managed plantations (17-20 year-old loblolly pine) in coastal and Piedmont areas of North Carolina, tree water use, cavitation resistance, whole-tree hydraulic (K-tree) and stomatal (G(s)) conductances were measured in four sites covering representative forests growing in the region. We also used a hydraulic model to predict the resilience of those sites to extreme soil drying. Our objectives were to determine: (1) if K-tree and stomatal regulation in response to atmospheric and soil droughts differ between species and sites; (2) how ecosystem type, through tree water use, resistance to cavitation and rooting profiles, affects the water uptake limit that can be reached under drought; and (3) the influence of stand species composition on critical transpiration that sets a functional water uptake limit under drought conditions. The results show that across sites, water stress affected the coordination between K-tree and G(s). As soil water content dropped below 20% relative extractable water, K-tree declined faster and thus explained the decrease in G(s) and in its sensitivity to vapor pressure deficit. Compared to branches, the capability of roots to resist high xylem tension has a great impact on tree-level water use and ultimately had important implications for pine plantations resistance to future summer droughts. Model simulations revealed that the decline in K-tree due to xylem cavitation aggravated the effects of soil drying on tree transpiration. The critical transpiration rate (E-crit), which corresponds to the maximum rate at which transpiration begins to level off to prevent irreversible hydraulic failure, was higher in managed forest plantations than in their unmanaged counterparts. However, even with this higher E-crit, the pine plantations operated very close to their critical leaf water potentials (i.e. to their permissible water potentials without total hydraulic failure), suggesting that intensively managed plantations are more drought-sensitive and can withstand less severe drought than natural forests.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
44. Effects of forest management on productivity and carbon sequestration: A review and hypothesis
- Author
-
John S. King, Asko Noormets, Thomas R. Fox, Daniel Epron, Jean-Christophe Domec, Ge Sun, Steven G. McNulty, North Carolina State University [Raleigh] (NC State), University of North Carolina System (UNC), Ecologie et Ecophysiologie Forestières [devient SILVA en 2018] (EEF), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Université de Lorraine (UL), Transfert Sol-Plante et Cycle des Eléments Minéraux dans les Ecosystèmes Cultivés (TCEM), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-École Nationale d'Ingénieurs des Travaux Agricoles - Bordeaux (ENITAB), United States Department of Agriculture - USDA (USA), Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University [Blacksburg], United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Asko Noormets, and Yann Nouvellon
- Subjects
Trade-offs ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio] ,Belowground allocation ,Forest management ,Harvest disturbance ,Climate change ,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law ,Carbon sequestration ,01 natural sciences ,Ecosystem services ,Carbon cycle ,Ecosystem ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Nature and Landscape Conservation ,Agroforestry ,Primary production ,Forestry ,04 agricultural and veterinary sciences ,15. Life on land ,Productivity (ecology) ,13. Climate action ,Fertilization ,040103 agronomy & agriculture ,0401 agriculture, forestry, and fisheries ,Environmental science ,Soil carbon sequestration ,Carbon management - Abstract
International audience; With an increasing fraction of the world's forests being intensively managed for meeting humanity's need for wood, fiber and ecosystem services, quantitative understanding of the functional changes in these ecosystems in comparison with natural forests is needed. In particular, the role of managed forests as long-term carbon (C) sinks and for mitigating climate change require a detailed assessment of their carbon cycle on different temporal scales. In the current review we assess available data on the structure and function of the world's forests, explore the main differences in the C exchange between managed and unmanaged stands, and explore potential physiological mechanisms behind both observed and expected changes. Two global databases that include classification for management indicate that managed forests are about 50 years younger, include 25% more coniferous stands, and have about 50% lower C stocks than unmanaged forests. The gross primary productivity (GPP) and total net primary productivity (NPP) are the similar, but relatively more of the assimilated carbon is allocated to aboveground pools in managed than in unmanaged forests, whereas allocation to fine roots and rhizosymbionts is lower. This shift in allocation patterns is promoted by increasing plant size, and by increased nutrient availability. Long-term carbon sequestration potential in soils is assessed through the ratio of heterotrophic respiration to total detritus production, which indicates that (i) the forest soils may be losing more carbon on an annual basis than they regain in detritus, and (ii) the deficit appears to be greater in managed forests. While climate change and management factors (esp. fertilization) both contribute to greater carbon accumulation potential in the soil, the harvest-related increase in decomposition affects the C budget over the entire harvest cycle. Although the findings do not preclude the use of forests for climate mitigation, maximizing merchantable productivity may have significant carbon costs for the soil pool. We conclude that optimal management strategies for maximizing multiple benefits from ecosystem services require better understanding of the dynamics of belowground allocation, carbohydrate availability, heterotrophic respiration, and carbon stabilization in the soil.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
45. Ecosystem Productivity and Evapotranspiration Are Tightly Coupled in Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda L.) Plantations along the Coastal Plain of the Southeastern U.S
- Author
-
John S. King, Kevan J. Minick, Maricar Aguilos, Jean-Christophe Domec, Ge Sun, Michael Gavazzi, Steven G. McNulty, Prajaya Prajapati, Bhaskar Mitra, Asko Noormets, North Carolina State University [Raleigh] (NC State), University of North Carolina System (UNC), USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Texas A&M University System, Interactions Sol Plante Atmosphère (UMR ISPA), Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Sciences Agronomiques de Bordeaux-Aquitaine (Bordeaux Sciences Agro)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Florida International University [Miami] (FIU), and Northern Arizona University [Flagstaff]
- Subjects
coastal plain ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Forest management ,evapotranspiration ,0207 environmental engineering ,Eddy covariance ,loblolly pine plantation ,02 engineering and technology ,Carbon sequestration ,01 natural sciences ,Carbon cycle ,Evapotranspiration ,eddy covariance ,Ecosystem ,QK900-989 ,Water-use efficiency ,Plant ecology ,020701 environmental engineering ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Forestry ,15. Life on land ,carbon and water coupling ,Productivity (ecology) ,Agronomy ,[SDE]Environmental Sciences ,Environmental science ,gross primary productivity ,forested wetland - Abstract
Forest water use efficiency (WUE), the ratio of gross primary productivity (GPP) to evapotranspiration (ET), is an important variable to understand the coupling between water and carbon cycles, and to assess resource use, ecosystem resilience, and commodity production. Here, we determined WUE for managed loblolly pine plantations over the course of a rotation on the coastal plain of North Carolina in the eastern U.S. We found that the forest annual GPP, ET, and WUE increased until age ten, which stabilized thereafter. WUE varied annually (2–44%), being higher at young plantation (YP, 3.12 ± 1.20 g C kg−1 H2O d−1) compared to a mature plantation (MP, 2.92 ± 0.45 g C kg−1 H2O d−1), with no distinct seasonal patterns. Stand age was strongly correlated with ET (R2 = 0.71) and GPP (R2 = 0.64). ET and GPP were tightly coupled (R2 = 0.86). Radiation and air temperature significantly affected GPP and ET (R2 = 0.71 − R2 = 0.82) at a monthly scale, but not WUE. Drought affected WUE (R2 = 0.35) more than ET (R2 = 0.25) or GPP (R2 = 0.07). A drought enhanced GPP in MP (19%) and YP (11%), but reduced ET 7% and 19% in MP and YP, respectively, resulting in a higher WUE (27–32%). Minor seasonal and interannual variation in forest WUE of MP (age >, 10) suggested that forest functioning became stable as stands matured. We conclude that carbon and water cycles in loblolly pine plantations are tightly coupled, with different characteristics in different ages and hydrologic regimes. A stable WUE suggests that the pine ecosystem productivity can be readily predicted from ET and vice versa. The tradeoffs between water and carbon cycling should be recognized in forest management to achieve multiple ecosystem services (i.e., water supply and carbon sequestration).
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
46. Effects of land-use change and drought on decadal evapotranspiration and water balance of natural and managed forested wetlands along the southeastern US lower coastal plain
- Author
-
Ge Sun, Kevan J. Minick, John S. King, Steve McNulty, Asko Noormets, Maricar Aguilos, Bhaskar Mitra, Michael Gavazzi, Yun Yang, Jean-Christophe Domec, Prajaya Prajapati, North Carolina State University [Raleigh] (NC State), University of North Carolina System (UNC), United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Texas A&M University System, Interactions Sol Plante Atmosphère (UMR ISPA), Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Sciences Agronomiques de Bordeaux-Aquitaine (Bordeaux Sciences Agro)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Eastern Forest Environmental Threat Assessment Center, Forest Service, Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, Pennsylvania State University (Penn State), Penn State System-Penn State System, and Texas A&M University [College Station]
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,Canopy ,Atmospheric Science ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Coastal plain ,Chronosequence ,Coastal plain forest ,Eddy covariance ,Wetland ,01 natural sciences ,Water balance ,Hydrology (agriculture) ,Evapotranspiration ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Forested wetlands ,Global and Planetary Change ,geography ,geography.geographical_feature_category ,Managed forests ,Drought ,Forestry ,15. Life on land ,13. Climate action ,[SDE]Environmental Sciences ,Environmental science ,Agronomy and Crop Science ,010606 plant biology & botany - Abstract
International audience; Forested wetlands are important in regulating regional hydrology and climate. However, long-term studies on the hydrologic impacts of converting natural forested wetlands to pine plantations are rare for the southern US. From 2005-2018, we quantified water cycling in two post-harvest and newly-planted loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) plantations (YP2-7, 2-7 yrs old; YP2-8, 2-8 yrs old), a rotation-age loblolly pine plantation (MP, 15-28 yrs old), and a natural bottomland hardwood forest (BHF, > 100 yrs old) along the lower coastal plain of North Carolina. We quantified the differences in inter-annual and seasonal water balance and trends of evapotranspiration (ET) using eddy covariance over 37 site-years and assessed key climatic and biological drivers of ET. We found that the rotation-age plantation (MP) had higher annual ET (933 +/- 63 mm) than the younger plantations (776 +/- 74 mm for YP2-7 and 638 +/- 190 mm for YP2-8), and the BHF (743 +/- 172 mm), owing to differences in stand age, canopy cover, and micrometeorology. Chronosequence analysis of the pine sites showed that ET increased with stand age up to 10 years, then gradually stabilized for the remainder of the rotation of 28 - 30 years. YP2-8 was sensitive to water availability, decreasing ET by 30 - 43 % during the extreme 2007 - 2008 drought, but reductions in ET at MP were only 8 - 11 %. Comparing to BHF, ditching with management enhanced drainage at YP2-7 and YP2-8, while drainage was lower at the mature pine site. This study provides insight into land use-hydrology-climate interactions that have important implications for forested wetland management in a time of rapidly changing environmental conditions of the LCP of the southern US.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
47. The increasing importance of atmospheric demand for ecosystem water and carbon fluxes
- Author
-
Russell L. Scott, Darren L. Ficklin, Benjamin N. Sulman, Lixin Wang, Gil Bohrer, Asko Noormets, Peter D. Blanken, Christopher B. Williams, A. Christopher Oishi, Kimberly A. Novick, Shirley A. Papuga, Paul C. Stoy, and Richard P. Phillips
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,Hydrology ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Foundation (engineering) ,Environmental Science (miscellaneous) ,Climate science ,01 natural sciences ,Hydrology (agriculture) ,Environmental science ,Ecosystem ,Ecosystem ecology ,Water resource management ,Social Sciences (miscellaneous) ,010606 plant biology & botany ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Carbon flux - Abstract
US Department of Energy; National Science Foundation (NSF) [DEB 1552747]; NSF [DEB 1552976, EF 1241881, EAR 125501, EAR 155489]; NOAA/GFDL-Princeton University Cooperative Institute for Climate Science
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
48. Development of a coupled carbon and water model for estimating global gross primary productivity and evapotranspiration based on eddy flux and remote sensing data
- Author
-
Ge Sun, Steven G. McNulty, Zhiqiang Zhang, Yulong Zhang, Asko Noormets, Lawrence E. Band, Quanfa Zhang, and Conghe Song
- Subjects
Atmospheric Science ,Global and Planetary Change ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Vapour Pressure Deficit ,0208 environmental biotechnology ,Eddy covariance ,Forestry ,02 engineering and technology ,01 natural sciences ,020801 environmental engineering ,FluxNet ,Evapotranspiration ,Environmental science ,Terrestrial ecosystem ,Moderate-resolution imaging spectroradiometer ,Water-use efficiency ,Water cycle ,Agronomy and Crop Science ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Remote sensing - Abstract
Terrestrial gross primary productivity (GPP) and evapotranspiration (ET) are two key ecosystem fluxes in the global carbon and water cycles. As carbon and water fluxes are inherently linked, knowing one provides information for the other. However, tightly coupled and easy to use ecosystem models are rare and there are still large uncertainties in global carbon and water flux estimates. In this study, we developed a new monthly coupled carbon and water (CCW) model. GPP was estimated based on the light-use efficiency (LUE) theory that considered the effect of diffuse radiation, while ET was modeled based on GPP and water-use efficiency (WUE). We evaluated the non-linear effect of single (GPPOR) or combined (GPPAND) limitations of temperature and vapor pressure deficit on GPP. We further compared the effects of three types of WUE (i.e., WUE, inherent WUE, and underlying WUE) on ET (i.e., ETWUE, ETIWUE and ETUWUE). CCW was calibrated and validated using global eddy covariance measurement from FLUXNET and remote sensing data from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) from 2000 to 2007. Modeled GPPAND and GPPOR explained 67.3% and 66.8% of variations of tower-derived GPP, respectively, while ETUWUE, ETIWUE and ETWUE explained 65.7%, 59.9% and 58.1% of tower-measured ET, respectively. Consequently, we chose GPPAND and ETUWUE as the best modeling framework for CCW, and estimated global GPP as 134.2 Pg C yr−1 and ET as 57.0 × 103 km3 for vegetated areas in 2001. Global ET estimated by CCW compared favorably with MODIS ET (60.5 × 103 km3) and ET derived from global precipitation (56.5 × 103 km3). However, global GPP estimated by CCW was about 19% higher than MODIS GPP (109.0 Pg C yr−1). The mean global WUE value estimated by CCW (2.35 g C kg−1 H2O) was close to the mean tower-based WUE (2.60 g C kg−1 H2O), but was much higher than the WUE derived from MODIS products (1.80 g C kg−1 H2O). We concluded that the new simple CCW model provided improved estimates of GPP and ET. The biome-specific parameters derived in this study allow CCW to be further linked with land use change models to project human impacts on terrestrial ecosystem functions.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
49. Evaluating atmospheric CO2 effects on gross primary productivity and net ecosystem exchanges of terrestrial ecosystems in the conterminous United States using the AmeriFlux data and an artificial neural network approach
- Author
-
Shaoqing Liu, Yujie He, Jiquan Chen, Asko Noormets, Lianhong Gu, and Qianlai Zhuang
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,Atmospheric Science ,Global and Planetary Change ,Carbon dioxide in Earth's atmosphere ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Artificial neural network ,Eddy covariance ,chemistry.chemical_element ,Primary production ,Forestry ,01 natural sciences ,Gross primary productivity ,chemistry ,Climatology ,Environmental science ,Ecosystem ,Terrestrial ecosystem ,Agronomy and Crop Science ,Carbon ,010606 plant biology & botany ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences - Abstract
Quantitative understanding of regional gross primary productivity (GPP) and net ecosystem exchanges (NEE) and their responses to environmental changes are critical to quantifying the feedbacks of ecosystems to the global climate system. Numerous studies have used the eddy flux data to upscale the eddy covariance derived carbon fluxes from stand scales to regional and global scales. However, few studies incorporated atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) concentrations into those extrapolations. Here, we consider the effect of atmospheric CO 2 using an artificial neural network (ANN) approach to upscale the AmeriFlux tower of NEE and the derived GPP to the conterminous United States. Two ANN models incorporating remote sensing variables at an 8-day time step were developed. One included CO 2 as an explanatory variable and the other did not. The models were first trained, validated using eddy flux data, and then extrapolated to the region at a 0.05 o × 0.05 o (latitude × longitude) resolution from 2001 to 2006. We found that both models performed well in simulating site-level carbon fluxes. The spatially-averaged annual GPP with and without considering the atmospheric CO 2 were 789 and 788 g C m −2 yr −1 , respectively (for NEE, the values were −112 and −109 g C m −2 yr −1 , respectively). Model predictions were comparable with previous published results and MODIS GPP products. However, the difference in GPP between the two models exhibited a great spatial and seasonal variability, with an annual difference of 200 g C m −2 yr −1 . Further analysis suggested that air temperature played an important role in determining the atmospheric CO 2 effects on carbon fluxes. In addition, the simulation that did not consider atmospheric CO 2 failed to detect ecosystem responses to droughts in part of the US in 2006. The study suggests that the spatially and temporally varied atmospheric CO 2 concentrations should be factored into carbon quantification when scaling eddy flux data to a region.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
50. Stability of soil organic carbon during forest conversion is more sensitive in deep soil than in topsoil in subtropical forests
- Author
-
Asko Noormets, Maokui Lyu, Yiqing Li, Yusheng Yang, Liisa Ukonmaanaho, and Jinsheng Xie
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,Topsoil ,Land use ,Soil Science ,04 agricultural and veterinary sciences ,Mineralization (soil science) ,Soil carbon ,Subtropics ,010603 evolutionary biology ,01 natural sciences ,Agronomy ,Disturbance (ecology) ,Soil water ,040103 agronomy & agriculture ,0401 agriculture, forestry, and fisheries ,Environmental science ,Physical accessibility ,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics - Abstract
Despite much research, a lot of uncertainty remains regarding the effects of forest conversion to plantation on soil organic carbon (SOC) stabilization, particularly in deep soils. After comparing the SOC content and its distribution in over 200 years old natural broadleaved of forest of Castanopsis carlesii to that in an adjacent 38 years old C. carlesii plantation, we evaluated the effect of land use intensification on soil carbon (C) storage indicators - soil aggregates, density fractions and SOC mineralization rate. The conversion of natural forest to plantation caused divergent, but seemingly progressive responses in the topsoil and deep soil. In the topsoil, SOC stocks were up to 32 % lower following the forest conversion, with a lower labile C pool, whereas the recalcitrance indices in the topsoil of the plantation forest was similar to that in the topsoil of the natural forest. In contrast, in the deep soil, SOC stocks were unaltered, but the recalcitrance indices of SOC decreased by 64 % after forest conversion. The decreased stability of deep SOC was confirmed by the observed decrease in biochemically protected C and increase in specific C mineralization (normalized for soil C content). The decline in biochemically protected C may attribute to greater physical accessibility of organic C to microbes due to soil disturbance induced by forests conversion practices. Consequently, our results supported the view that despite the variable processing rates of C in differently protected pools, all SOC pools are potentially decomposable and dynamic. Physical disturbance appears to be the key factor modifying SOC protection status and long-term stabilization.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.