Search

Routine placement of a feeding jejunostomy tube (FJT) following esophagectomy remains controversial due to the risk of complications including small bowel obstruction (SBO). This study aimed to evaluate FJT placement following esophagectomy.This retrospective cohort study included consecutive 229 patients undergoing thoracoscopic esophagectomy between January 2010 and June 2020. Short-term outcomes, postoperative nutritional status, incidence of SBO, and long-term outcomes were compared between patients according to FJT placement.The total operative duration was significantly longer in the FJT group compared to the no FJT group (P 0.0001); however, no differences in overall or severe postoperative morbidity were observed. Body weight loss at discharge was significantly attenuated in patients with FJT (5% vs 7%, P = 0.001). Serum cholinesterase levels were significantly higher in patients with FJT (P = 0.002), while no difference was observed in serum albumin levels. At 6-month follow-up, no statistically significant differences were observed in serological markers or percentage body weight. The incidence of SBO was significantly higher in the FJT group (P = 0.006). The 5-year incidence of SBO was 12%. Patients in the FJT group had higher progression-free and overall survival compared to patients in the no FJT group (P = 0.041 and P = 0.033, respectively). A similar trend toward better survival in the FJT group was observed after propensity score matching.Routine placement of FJT significantly improves postoperative nutritional status and may contribute to improved long-term survival but is associated with increased long-term risk of SBO.

An 85 year-old woman was transferred with a chief complaint of right thigh pain persisting for 5 days. Abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography clearly depicted a swollen appendix incarcerated in the right obturator cavity. She underwent an emergent laparoscopic appendectomy and the simultaneous repair of the obturator hernia. At laparoscopy, appendix was found to be incarcerated in the right obturator canal. The incarcerated appendix was successfully flushed out from the sac by spurting saline into the obturator hernia sac through the catheter inserted into the hernia sac. After a laparoscopic appendectomy, the hernia orifice was repaired using the uterine flap. The patient was discharged from the hospital without any sequelae. This report demonstrates a very rare case of obturator hernia incarcerated with appendix. Although patients with obturator hernia incarcerated with small intestine present with the symptoms related to bowel obstruction, patients with incarceration of appendix do not. Moreover, they would show no typical abdominal symptoms associated with acute appendicitis. Therefore, it is important to perform a radiological evaluation promptly to make a definitive diagnosis when a patient with persisting pain of the right thigh or right ileac fossa with a possibility of obturator hernia with incarceration of the appendix is encountered.