Search

Introduction Unsupervised digital cognitive testing is an appealing means to capture subtle cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD). Here, we describe development, feasibility, and validity of the Boston Remote Assessment for Neurocognitive Health (BRANCH) against in‐person cognitive testing and amyloid/tau burden. Methods BRANCH is web‐based, self‐guided, and assesses memory processes vulnerable in AD. Clinically normal participants (n = 234; aged 50–89) completed BRANCH; a subset underwent in‐person cognitive testing and positron emission tomography imaging. Mean accuracy across BRANCH tests (Categories, Face‐Name‐Occupation, Groceries, Signs) was calculated. Results BRANCH was feasible to complete on participants’ own devices (primarily smartphones). Technical difficulties and invalid/unusable data were infrequent. BRANCH psychometric properties were sound, including good retest reliability. BRANCH was correlated with in‐person cognitive testing (r = 0.617, P

Introduction We determine whether diminished Learning Over Repeated Exposures (LORE) identifies subtle memory decrements in cognitively unimpaired (CU) older adults with Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarker burden. Methods Ninety‐four CU participants (mean age = 77.6 ± 5.02) completed a challenging associative memory test, at home, monthly, for up to 1 year (mean = 9.97 months) on a study‐issued iPad. Learning curves for face‐name memory were computed for two versions completed monthly: same face‐name pairs (A‐A‐A) and alternate face‐name pairs (B‐C‐D). Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging characterized global amyloid (Pittsburgh Compound‐B (PiB); amyloid beta (Aβ)+/−) and regional tau burden (flortaucipir). Results Diminished LORE for same (but not alternate) face‐name pairs was associated with greater amyloid and tau burden. Aβ+/− group differences for same face‐name pairs emerged by the fourth exposure and was of medium‐to‐large magnitude (Cohen's d = 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.25‐1.08). Discussion Subtle decrements in learning related to AD pathological burden in CU are detectable over short time‐intervals (ie, months). Implications for prevention trial design are discussed.

OBJECTIVE: The Face-Name Associative Memory Exam (FNAME) has been used to detect subtle cognitive changes in clinically normal older adults at increased risk for Alzheimer’s disease. FNAME assesses learning and delayed recall for face-name pairs. The aim of this study is to introduce a Latin American Spanish version of the FNAME (LAS-FNAME), examine its psychometric properties, and provide preliminary normative data in a sample of clinically normal, Spanish-speaking individuals from Antioquia, Colombia. METHOD: 59 clinically normal individuals (71% females) were recruited by the Grupo de Neurociencias in Antioquia (Colombia). Age ranged from 27 to 82 years ( M=50.31, SD=15.32) and years of education ranged from 2 to 17 years (M=9.02, SD=4.11). All participants completed the LAS-FNAME and a brief neuropsychological evaluation. We examined associations between age, education, and sex and performance on the LAS-FNAME. Internal consistency, convergent and discriminant validity were also assessed. Test-restest reliability was computed for a subset of participants (n = 32). RESULTS: LAS-FNAME exhibited moderate convergent validity with other memory measures (Free and Cued Selective Reminding Scale, r(s)=.465, p65) and low and high educational attainment (≤8 and >8 years of education, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The LAS-FNAME is a valid and reliable measure to assess memory in clinically normal, Spanish-speaking individuals from Colombia for clinical and research purposes.