Search

Abstract Background The Field Epidemiology Training Program (FETP)-Frontline is a three-month in-service training aimed at improving surveillance officers’ capacity to collect, analyze, and interpret surveillance data, and respond to health emergencies. We evaluated the effectiveness of the FETP-Frontline which was introduced in Ethiopia in 2016. Methods We conducted a comparative, randomized cross-sectional study to assess surveillance-related knowledge, skills, and performance among trained and untrained officers using a structured questionnaire and observation checklist. We compared the knowledge, skills, and performance scores of trained and untrained officers using the Fisher’s Exact test, chi-square test, and t-test at p-value

Abstract Background Field epidemiology training programs (FETPs) have trained field epidemiologists who strengthen global capacities for surveillance and response to public health threats. We describe how FETP residents and graduates have contributed to COVID-19 preparedness and response globally. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey of FETPs between March 13 and April 15, 2020 to understand how FETP residents or graduates were contributing to COVID-19 response activities. The survey tool was structured around the eight Pillars of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Strategic Preparedness and Response Plan for COVID-19. We used descriptive statistics to summarize quantitative results and content analysis for qualitative data. Results Among 88 invited programs, 65 (74%) responded and indicated that FETP residents and graduates have engaged in the COVID-19 response across all six WHO regions. Response efforts focused on country-level coordination (98%), surveillance, rapid response teams, case investigations (97%), activities at points of entry (92%), and risk communication and community engagement (82%). Descriptions of FETP contributions to COVID-19 preparedness and response are categorized into seven main themes: conducting epidemiological activities, managing logistics and coordination, leading risk communication efforts, providing guidance, supporting surveillance activities, training and developing the workforce, and holding leadership positions. Conclusions Our findings demonstrate the value of FETPs in responding to public health threats like COVID-19. This program provides critical assistance to countries' COVID-19 response efforts but also enhances epidemiologic workforce capacity, public health emergency infrastructure and helps ensure global health security as prescribed in the WHO’s International Health Regulations.

From the Field is a semiregular column that provides insight into the experiences of local, county, or state health professionals on the frontlines of health emergencies. National Association of County and City Health Officials members share the challenges faced and the solutions developed as they prepared for and responded to disasters, epidemics, and other major health issues. The aim of sharing these practical experiences is to provide other public health champions with the information and tools they need to help keep their communities safe even in extreme situations. The COVID-19 pandemic created an extraordinarily high demand for personal protective equipment (PPE). Acute need and supply chain disruptions made hospitals, emergency medical services, and other critical care agencies particularly vulnerable to PPE shortages. In March 2020, King County, Washington, developed computational tools, operating procedures, and data visualizations to fulfill its responsibilities to prioritize, allocate, and distribute scarce PPE equitably and efficiently during a public health emergency. King County distributed over 1.6 million gowns, 22 million gloves, 3.9 million surgical masks, and 1.5 million N95 respirators (among other items) during its PPE distribution mission. An algorithm processed resource requests from the community, with respect to available inventory, emergency allocation policies, prioritization constraints, estimated PPE use rates, agency-specific needs, and other parameters. With these inputs and constraints, the requests were translated into instructions for fulfillment and delivery and several tabular and graphical data visualizations were produced for quality assurance and transparency. Access to timely, relevant, and stable data was a constant challenge, and constraints invariably changed as the emergency response unfolded. King County's PPE distribution mission provides a useful case study in how to develop a scalable and data-driven approach to resource allocation and distribution under emergency response conditions.