Search

Giulia Marvaso,1,2,* Stefania Volpe,1,2,* Matteo Pepa,1,* Mattia Zaffaroni,1,* Giulia Corrao,1,2,* Matteo Augugliaro,1,* Franco Nolè,3,* Ottavio De Cobelli,2,4,* Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa1,2,* 1Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; 2Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; 3Medical Oncology Division of Urogenital & Head & Neck Tumors, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; 4Department of Urology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Matteo PepaDivision of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, ItalyEmail matteo.pepa@ieo.itAbstract: After primary treatment for prostate cancer with either radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy, a significant proportion of patients are at risk of developing metastases. In recent years, a deeper understanding of the underlying biology together with improved imaging techniques and the advent of new therapeutic options including metastases-directed therapies and new drugs have revolutionized the management of low-burden metastatic disease, also known as oligometastatic state. The purpose of this narrative review is to report the recent developments in the management of hormone-sensitive oligometastatic prostate cancer patients.Keywords: oligometastatic prostate cancer, metastasis-directed therapies, narrative review, imaging, biology

Aerosol transmission remains a major challenge for control of respiratory viruses, particularly those causing recurrent epidemics, like influenza A virus (IAV). These viruses are rarely expelled alone, but instead are embedded in a consortium of microorganisms that populate the respiratory tract. The impact of microbial communities and inter-pathogen interactions upon stability of transmitted viruses is well-characterized for enteric pathogens, but is under-studied in the respiratory niche. Here, we assessed whether the presence of five different species of commensal respiratory bacteria could influence the persistence of IAV within phosphate-buffered saline and artificial saliva droplets deposited on surfaces at typical indoor air humidity, and within airborne aerosol particles. In droplets, presence of individual species or a mixed bacterial community resulted in 10- to 100-fold more infectious IAV remaining after 1 h, due to bacterial-mediated flattening of drying droplets and early efflorescence. Even when no efflorescence occurred at high humidity or the bacteria-induced changes in droplet morphology were abolished by aerosolization instead of deposition on a well plate, the bacteria remained protective. Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae were the most stabilizing compared to other commensals at equivalent density, indicating the composition of an individual's respiratory microbiota is a previously unconsidered factor influencing expelled virus persistence.IMPORTANCEIt is known that respiratory infections such as coronavirus disease 2019 and influenza are transmitted by release of virus-containing aerosols and larger droplets by an infected host. The survival time of viruses expelled into the environment can vary depending on temperature, room air humidity, UV exposure, air composition, and suspending fluid. However, few studies consider the fact that respiratory viruses are not alone in the respiratory tract-we are constantly colonized by a plethora of bacteria in our noses, mouth, and lower respiratory system. In the gut, enteric viruses are known to be stabilized against inactivation and environmental decay by gut bacteria. Despite the presence of a similarly complex bacterial microbiota in the respiratory tract, few studies have investigated whether viral stabilization could occur in this niche. Here, we address this question by investigating influenza A virus stabilization by a range of commensal bacteria in systems representing respiratory aerosols and droplets., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Purpose: ARTO (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03449719) is a multicenter, phase II randomized clinical trial testing the benefit of adding stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to abiraterone acetate and prednisone (AAP) in patients with oligometastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)., Materials and Methods: All patients were affected by oligometastatic CRPC as defined as three or less nonvisceral metastatic lesions. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either AAP alone (control arm) or AAP with concomitant SBRT to all the sites of disease (experimental arm). Primary end point was the rate of biochemical response (BR), defined as a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decrease ≥50% from baseline measured at 6 months from treatment start. Complete BR (CBR), defined as PSA < 0.2 ng/mL at 6 months from treatment, and progression-free survival (PFS) were secondary end points., Results: One hundred and fifty-seven patients were enrolled between January 2019 and September 2022. BR was detected in 79.6% of patients (92% v 68.3% in the experimental v control arm, respectively), with an odds ratio (OR) of 5.34 (95% CI, 2.05 to 13.88; P = .001) in favor of the experimental arm. CBR was detected in 38.8% of patients (56% v 23.2% in the experimental v control arm, respectively), with an OR of 4.22 (95% CI, 2.12 to 8.38; P < .001). SBRT yielded a significant PFS improvement, with a hazard ratio for progression of 0.35 (95% CI, 0.21 to 0.57; P < .001) in the experimental versus control arm., Conclusion: The trial reached its primary end point of biochemical control and PFS, suggesting a clinical advantage for SBRT in addition to first-line AAP treatment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Background: The rates of local failure after curative radiotherapy for prostate cancer (PC) remain high despite more accurate locoregional treatments available, with one third of patients experiencing biochemical failure and clinical relapse occurring in 30-47% of cases. Today, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the treatment of choice in this setting, but with not negligible toxicity and low effects on local disease. Therefore, the treatment of intraprostatic PC recurrence represents a challenge for radiation oncologists. Prostate reirradiation (Re-I) might be a therapeutic possibility. We present our series of patients treated with salvage stereotactic Re‑I for intraprostatic recurrence of PC after radical radiotherapy, with the aim of evaluating feasibility and safety of linac-based prostate Re‑I., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated toxicities and outcomes of patients who underwent salvage reirradiation using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for intraprostatic PC recurrence. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years, histologically proven diagnosis of PC, salvage Re‑I for intraprostatic recurrence after primary radiotherapy for PC with curative intent, concurrent/adjuvant ADT with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) allowed, performance status ECOG 0-2, restaging choline/PSMA-PET/TC and prostate MRI after biochemical recurrence, and signed informed consent., Results: From January 2019 to April 2022, 20 patients were recruited. Median follow-up was 26.7 months (range 7-50). After SBRT, no patients were lost at follow-up and all are still alive. One- and 2‑year progression free survival (PFS) was 100% and 81.5%, respectively, while 2‑year biochemical progression-free survival (bFFS) was 88.9%. Four patients (20%) experienced locoregional lymph node progression and were treated with a further course of SBRT. Prostate reirradiation allowed the ADT start to be postponed for 12-39 months. Re‑I was well tolerated by all patients and none discontinued the treatment. No cases of ≥ G3 genitourinary (GU) or gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity were reported. Seven (35%) and 2 (10%) patients experienced acute G1 and G2 GU toxicity, respectively. Late GU toxicity was recorded in 10 (50%) patients, including 8 (40%) G1 and 2 (10%) G2. ADT-related side effects were found in 7 patients (hot flashes and asthenia)., Conclusion: Linac-based SBRT is a safe technique for performing Re‑I for intraprostatic recurrence after primary curative radiotherapy for PC. Future prospective, randomized studies are desirable to better understand the effectiveness of reirradiation and the still open questions in this field., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background/aim: Radiotherapy represents an important therapeutic option in the management of prostate cancer (PCa). As helical tomotherapy may improve toxicity outcomes, we aimed to evaluate and report the toxicity and clinical outcomes of localized PCa patients treated with moderately hypofractionated helical tomotherapy., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 415 patients affected by localized PCa and treated with moderately hypofractionated helical tomotherapy in our department from January 2008 to December 2020. All patients were stratified according to the D'Amico risk classification: low-risk 21%, favorable intermediate-risk 16%, unfavorable intermediate-risk 30.4%, and high-risk 32.6%. The dose prescription for high-risk patients was 72.8 Gy to the prostate (planning tumor volume-PTV1), 61.6 Gy to the seminal vesicles (PTV2), and 50.4 Gy to the pelvic lymph nodes (PTV3) in 28 fractions; for low- and intermediate-risk patients 70 Gy for PTV1, 56 Gy for PTV2, and 50.4 Gy for PTV3 in 28 fractions. Image-guided radiation therapy was performed daily in all patients by mega-voltage computed tomography. Forty-one percent of patients received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Acute and late toxicity was assessed according to the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v.5.0 (CTCAE)., Results: Median follow-up was 82.7 months (range=12-157 months) and the median age of patients at diagnosis was 72.5 years (range=49-84 years). The 3, 5, and 7 yr overall survival (OS) rates were 95%, 90%, and 84%, respectively, while 3, 5, and 7 yr disease-free survival (DFS) were 96%, 90%, and 87%, respectively. Acute toxicity was as follows: genitourinary (GU) G1 and G2 in 35.9% and 24%; gastrointestinal (GI) in 13.7% and 8%, with G3 or more acute toxicities less than 1%. The late GI toxicity G2 and G3 were 5.3% and 1%, respectively, and the late GU toxicity G2 and G3 were 4.8% and 2.1%, respectively, and only three patients had a G4 toxicity., Conclusion: Hypofractionated helical tomotherapy for PCa treatment appeared to be safe and reliable, with favorable acute and late toxicity rates and encouraging results in terms of disease control., (Copyright © 2023, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)