Search

The global demand for hospital care, driven by population growth and medical advances, emphasizes the importance of optimized resource management. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols aim to expedite patient recovery and reduce health care costs without compromising patient safety or satisfaction. Its principles have been adopted in various surgical specialties but have not fully encompassed all areas of neurosurgery, including craniotomy. ERAS for craniotomy has been shown to reduce the length of hospital stay and costs without increasing complications. ERAS protocols may also reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting and perioperative opioid requirements, highlighting their potential to enhance patient outcomes and health care efficiency. Despite these benefits, guidelines, and strategies for ERAS in craniotomy remain limited. This narrative review explores the current global landscape of ERAS for craniotomy, assessing existing literature and highlighting knowledge gaps. Experts from 26 countries with diverse cultural and socioeconomic backgrounds contributed to this review, offering insights about current ERAS protocol applications, implementation challenges, and future perspectives, and providing a comprehensive global overview of ERAS for craniotomy. Representatives from all 6 World Health Organization geographical world areas reported that barriers to the implementation of ERAS for craniotomy include the absence of standardized protocols, provider resistance to change, resource constraints, insufficient education, and research scarcity. This review emphasizes the necessity of tailored ERAS protocols for low and middle-income countries, addressing differences in available resources. Acknowledging limitations in subjectivity and article selection, this review provides a comprehensive overview of ERAS for craniotomy from a global perspective and underscores the need for adaptable ERAS protocols tailored to specific health care systems and countries., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The frequency of duplex ultrasound screening (DUS) for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients with brain tumors undergoing craniotomy is center-specific. We evaluated clinical conditions that increase the tendency to perform DUS, focusing on tumor type., Methods: This is a single-center retrospective analysis to assess the association of intracranial tumor type with DVT as a major decision-making indicator for DUS. A primary analysis investigated the association between tumor pathology and preoperative DVT, and a secondary analysis investigated the development of DVT postoperatively. Confounding factors were defined and included in both analyses., Results: Among 1478 patients, 751 had preoperative DUS and 35 (5%) had DVT. No significant difference in the odds of preoperative DVT was observed between patients having malignant glioma versus benign tumors (odds ratio [OR; 95% CI]: 1.68 [0.65, 4.35], P = 0.29), or metastatic tumors versus benign tumors (OR: 2.10; 95% CI: 0.75-5.89; P = 0.16). Among patients with negative preoperative DUS, 93 underwent postoperative evaluation and 20 (22%) were diagnosed with postoperative DVT. Malignant glioma or (OR: 1.69; 95% CI: 0.36-7.84; P = 0.50) metastatic tumors (OR: 1.84; 95% CI: 0.29-11.5; P = 0.52) were not associated with postoperative DVT versus benign tumors., Conclusion: Brain tumor pathology may not increase the risk for DVT and may not be a good indicator for the selection of patients for DVT screening with DUS. The incidence of DVT in selective preoperative DUS was similar to studies that performed DUS on all patients. Further studies across multiple institutions are needed to develop criteria for DUS in brain tumor surgery., Competing Interests: R.A. is a member of the editorial board of the Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology. He has received invited speaker honoraria, a SPARK Catalyst Grant for medical device Innovation and other patents with potential royalties, none of which are relevant to this study. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have revolutionized the approach to perioperative care in various surgical specialties. They reduce complications, improve patient outcomes, and shorten hospital lengths of stay. Implementation of ERAS protocols for neurosurgical procedures has been relatively underexplored and underutilized due to the unique challenges and complexities of neurosurgery. This narrative review explores the barriers to, and pioneering strategies of, standardized procedure-specific ERAS protocols, and the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration in neurosurgery and neuroanesthsia, patient-centered approaches, and continuous quality improvement initiatives, to achieve better patient outcomes. It also discusses initiatives to guide future clinical practice, research, and guideline creation, to foster the development of tailored ERAS protocols in neurosurgery., Competing Interests: R.A. is a member of the editorial board of the Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology . The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

There are many established factors that influence glioma progression, including patient age, grade of tumor, genetic mutations, extent of surgical resection, and chemoradiotherapy. Although the exposure time to anesthetics during glioma resection surgery is relatively brief, the hemodynamic changes involved and medications used, as well as the stress response throughout the perioperative period, may also influence postoperative outcomes in glioma patients. There are numerous studies that have demonstrated that choice of anesthesia influences non-brain cancer outcomes; of particular interest are those describing that the use of total intravenous anesthesia may yield superior outcomes compared with volatile agents in in vitro and human studies. Much remains to be discovered on the topic of anesthesia's effect on glioma progression., Competing Interests: The authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: R.A. is a member of the Editorial Board of the Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology. The authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to disclose.

Adequate analgesia is known to improve outcomes after spine surgery. Despite recent attention highlighting the negative effects of narcotics and their addiction potential, opioids have been the mainstay of management for providing analgesia following spine surgeries. However, side effects including hyperalgesia, tolerance, and subsequent dependence restrict the generous usage of opioids. Multimodal analgesia regimens acting through different mechanisms offer significant opioid sparing and minimize the side effects of individual drugs. Hence, they are being increasingly incorporated into enhanced recovery protocols. Multimodal analgesia includes drugs such as N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and membrane-stabilizing agents, neuraxial opioids, local anesthetic infiltration, and fascial compartment blocks. Analgesia started before the painful stimulus, termed preemptive analgesia, facilitates subsequent pain management. Both nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and neuraxial analgesia have been conclusively shown to reduce opioid requirements after spine surgery, and there is a resurgence of interest in the use of low-dose ketamine or methadone. Neuraxial narcotics offer enhanced analgesia for a longer duration with lower dosage and side effect profiles compared with systemic opioid administration. Fascial compartment blocks are increasingly used as they provide effective analgesia with fewer adverse effects. In this narrative review, we will discuss multimodality analgesic regimens incorporating opioid-sparing adjuvants to manage pain after spine surgery., Competing Interests: The authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic is an international crisis placing tremendous strain on medical systems around the world. Like other specialties, neuroanesthesiology has been adversely affected and training programs have had to quickly adapt to the constantly changing environment., Methods: An email-based survey was used to evaluate the effects of the pandemic on clinical workflow, clinical training, education, and trainee well-being. The impact of the International Council on Perioperative Neuroscience Training (ICPNT) accreditation was also assessed., Results: Responses were received from 14 program directors (88% response rate) in 10 countries and from 36 fellows in these programs. Clinical training was adversely affected because of the cancellation of elective neurosurgery and other changes in case workflow, the introduction of modified airway and other protocols, and redeployment of trainees to other sites. To address educational demands, most programs utilized online platforms to organize clinical discussions, journal clubs, and provide safety training modules. Several initiatives were introduced to support trainee well-being during the pandemic. Feelings of isolation and despair among trainees varied from 2 to 8 (on a scale of 1 to 10). Fellows all reported concerns that their clinical training had been adversely affected by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic because of decreased exposure to elective subspecialty cases and limited opportunities to complete workplace-based assessments and training portfolio requirements. Cancellation of examination preparation courses and delayed examinations were cited as common sources of stress. Programs accredited by the ICPNT reported that international networking and collaboration was beneficial to reduce feelings of isolation during the pandemic., Conclusion: Neuroanesthesia fellowship training program directors introduced innovative ways to maintain clinical training, educational activity and trainee well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background: Renal autotransplantation is a complex procedure performed for various indications such as treatment of renal vascular and urologic lesions and loin pain hematuria syndrome (LPHS). Because of the rarity of the procedure, few reports have been published, and little is known about anesthetic management and postoperative outcomes of patients with LPHS. The goal of this study was to review and describe all cases of renal autotransplantation performed at Cleveland Clinic during a specified period, focusing on anesthetic management and postoperative 30-day outcomes. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of the records of all patients who underwent renal autotransplantation from 2005 to 2014 at the Cleveland Clinic and collected demographic, anesthetic, surgical, and postoperative data. Results: A total of 64 patients underwent renal autotransplantation from 2005 to 2014. The most frequent indications were nephrolithiasis and LPHS. General endotracheal anesthesia with epidural for pain control was used in 47% of cases. Median duration of anesthesia was 528 minutes. Most patients were sent to a regular nursing floor postoperatively, but 28% of patients required intensive care unit admission. Two patients developed graft ischemia, and 1 patient developed graft failure requiring nephrectomy. No anesthetic-related complications and no mortality were associated with this procedure during the study. Conclusion: Renal autotransplantation is a safe option for patients with LPHS. Additional studies are needed to assess the effect of intraoperative anesthetic management on outcomes in this patient population., (©2020 by the author(s); Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).)

The pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has several implications relevant to neuroanesthesiologists, including neurological manifestations of the disease, impact of anesthesia provision for specific neurosurgical procedures and electroconvulsive therapy, and health care provider wellness. The Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care appointed a task force to provide timely, consensus-based expert guidance for neuroanesthesiologists during the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this document is to provide a focused overview of COVID-19 disease relevant to neuroanesthesia practice. This consensus statement provides information on the neurological manifestations of COVID-19, advice for neuroanesthesia clinical practice during emergent neurosurgery, interventional radiology (excluding endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke), transnasal neurosurgery, awake craniotomy and electroconvulsive therapy, as well as information about health care provider wellness. Institutions and health care providers are encouraged to adapt these recommendations to best suit local needs, considering existing practice standards and resource availability to ensure safety of patients and providers.

Background: Various multimodal analgesic approaches have been proposed for spine surgery. The authors evaluated the effect of using a combination of four nonopioid analgesics versus placebo on Quality of Recovery, postoperative opioid consumption, and pain scores., Methods: Adults having multilevel spine surgery who were at high risk for postoperative pain were double-blind randomized to placebos or the combination of single preoperative oral doses of acetaminophen 1,000 mg and gabapentin 600 mg, an infusion of ketamine 5 µg/kg/min throughout surgery, and an infusion of lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg/h intraoperatively and during the initial hour of recovery. Postoperative analgesia included acetaminophen, gabapentin, and opioids. The primary outcome was the Quality of Recovery 15-questionnaire (0 to 150 points, with 15% considered to be a clinically important difference) assessed on the third postoperative day. Secondary outcomes were opioid use in morphine equivalents (with 20% considered to be a clinically important change) and verbal-response pain scores (0 to 10, with a 1-point change considered important) over the initial postoperative 48 h., Results: The trial was stopped early for futility per a priori guidelines. The average duration ± SD of surgery was 5.4 ± 2.1 h. The mean ± SD Quality of Recovery score was 109 ± 25 in the pathway patients (n = 150) versus 109 ± 23 in the placebo group (n = 149); estimated difference in means was 0 (95% CI, -6 to 6, P = 0.920). Pain management within the initial 48 postoperative hours was not superior in analgesic pathway group: 48-h opioid consumption median (Q1, Q3) was 72 (48, 113) mg in the analgesic pathway group and 75 (50, 152) mg in the placebo group, with the difference in medians being -9 (97.5% CI, -23 to 5, P = 0.175) mg. Mean 48-h pain scores were 4.8 ± 1.8 in the analgesic pathway group versus 5.2 ± 1.9 in the placebo group, with the difference in means being -0.4 (97.5% CI; -0.8, 0.1, P = 0.094)., Conclusions: An analgesic pathway based on preoperative acetaminophen and gabapentin, combined with intraoperative infusions of lidocaine and ketamine, did not improve recovery in patients who had multilevel spine surgery.

Neurosurgical procedures are unique in that the best monitoring modality is the neurologic examination and the most important sign includes an intact mental status. Anesthesiologists play a vital role in medical management of neurosurgical emergencies. The authors discuss the important management strategies for these emergencies, including increased intracranial pressure and impending brain herniation, acute alteration of mental status, status epilepticus, and trauma to cervical spine. The key is to maintain cerebral and spinal cord perfusion pressure at all times to salvage neuronal recovery., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The refractory seizures have significant impact on the quality of life and increase long term neurologic and non-neurologic complications. Implantation of Stereotactic Electroencephalography (SEEG) leads is one of the newer surgical techniques intended to localize seizure foci with higher accuracy than the conventional methods. Most of the commonly utilized anesthetic agents depress EEG waveforms affecting intra operative monitoring during these surgeries. Hence, the anesthetic goals include a stable induction and maintenance with agents which have minimal effect on EEG. This article discusses the peri-operative considerations of multiple anti-epileptic medications, recent advances in anesthetic management, and important post-operative concerns., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright: © 2019 Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology.)

Standardized clinical pathways are useful tool to reduce variation in clinical management and may improve quality of care. However the evidence supporting a specific clinical pathway for a patient or patient population is often imperfect limiting adoption and efficacy of clinical pathway. Machine intelligence can potentially identify clinical variation and may provide useful insights to create and optimize clinical pathways. In this quality improvement project we analyzed the inpatient care of 1786 patients undergoing colorectal surgery from 2015 to 2016 across multiple Ohio hospitals in the Cleveland Clinic System. Data from four information subsystems was loaded in the Clinical Variation Management (CVM) application (Ayasdi, Inc., Menlo Park, CA). The CVM application uses machine intelligence and topological data analysis methods to identify groups of similar patients based on the treatment received. We defined "favorable performance" as groups with lower direct variable cost, lower length of stay, and lower 30-day readmissions. The software auto-generated 9 distinct groups of patients based on similarity analysis. Overall, favorable performance was seen with ketorolac use, lower intra-operative fluid use (< 2000 cc) and surgery for cancer. Multiple sub-groups were easily created and analyzed. Adherence reporting tools were easy to use enabling almost real time monitoring. Machine intelligence provided useful insights to create and monitor care pathways with several advantages over traditional analytic approaches including: (1) analysis across disparate data sets, (2) unsupervised discovery, (3) speed and auto-generation of clinical pathways, (4) ease of use by team members, and (5) adherence reporting.

Objective: Current management of gliomas involves a multidisciplinary approach, including a combination of maximal safe resection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. The use of intraoperative MRI (iMRI) helps to maximize extent of resection (EOR), and use of awake functional mapping supports preservation of eloquent areas of the brain. This study reports on the combined use of these surgical adjuncts., Methods: The authors performed a retrospective review of patients with gliomas who underwent minimal access craniotomy in their iMRI suite (IMRIS) with awake functional mapping between 2010 and 2017. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative adverse events, and treatment details were obtained. Volumetric analysis of preoperative tumor volume as well as intraoperative and postoperative residual volumes was performed., Results: A total of 61 patients requiring 62 tumor resections met the inclusion criteria. Of the tumors resected, 45.9% were WHO grade I or II and 54.1% were WHO grade III or IV. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring modalities included speech alone in 23 cases (37.1%), motor alone in 24 (38.7%), and both speech and motor in 15 (24.2%). Intraoperative MRI demonstrated residual tumor in 48 cases (77.4%), 41 (85.4%) of whom underwent further resection. Median EOR on iMRI and postoperative MRI was 86.0% and 98.5%, respectively, with a mean difference of 10% and a median difference of 10.5% (p < 0.001). Seventeen of 62 cases achieved an increased EOR > 15% related to use of iMRI. Seventeen (60.7%) of 28 low-grade gliomas and 10 (30.3%) of 33 high-grade gliomas achieved complete resection. Significant intraoperative events included at least temporary new or worsened speech alteration in 7 of 38 cases who underwent speech mapping (18.4%), new or worsened weakness in 7 of 39 cases who underwent motor mapping (18.0%), numbness in 2 cases (3.2%), agitation in 2 (3.2%), and seizures in 2 (3.2%). Among the patients with new intraoperative deficits, 2 had residual speech difficulty, and 2 had weakness postoperatively, which improved to baseline strength by 6 months., Conclusions: In this retrospective case series, the combined use of iMRI and awake functional mapping was demonstrated to be safe and feasible. This combined approach allows one to achieve the dual goals of maximal tumor removal and minimal functional consequences in patients undergoing glioma resection.

Background: Parkinson disease (PD), a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra of the midbrain, is commonly thought of as a motion disorder, but it can have significant effect on the respiratory system. Respiratory failure is the most common cause of death in these patients, but it can also affect laryngeal function causing dysphonia, dysphagia, and dysarthric speech. Acute upper airway obstruction is a rare finding in PD, especially in the perioperative settings. In this article we report a PD patient who developed upper respiratory obstruction postoperatively. We also review the literature and highlight the importance of preoperative evaluation to identify patients who may be at risk of this complication., Case Description: We describe a PD patient presenting for brain stimulation electrode implantation under general anesthesia, who postoperatively developed stridor and near complete upper airway obstruction despite maintenance of oral anti-Parkinson medication regimen intraoperatively. The patient was reintubated in post-anesthesia-care unit, and tracheostomy was performed after 1 week due to persistent vocal cord dysfunction., Conclusions: Baseline vocal cord impairment in PD patients can be acutely aggravated perioperatively. Symptoms such as dysphagia and dysarthria, which can indicate susceptibility to postoperative upper airway obstruction, may not be well recognized by the patient and family. Surgical candidates should be carefully interviewed preoperatively, and watchful monitoring of respiratory function intraoperatively and postoperatively is of paramount importance. Neurosurgical and neuroanesthesia team should be aware of, and prepared to manage, this potentially life-threatening airway obstruction in PD patients., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: The main objective of this article is to present the updated data regarding the perioperative management of patients undergoing major spine surgery in an era where the surgical techniques are changing and there is a high demand for these surgeries in older and high-risk patients., Recent Findings: Preoperative assessment and stabilization is now more structured protocol and it is based on a multidisciplinary approach to the patient. The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs and the Perioperative Surgical Home on major spine surgery are not yet fully evidence based but it seems that the use of a perioperative optimization of patients and use of a drugs' bundle is more effective than using single drugs or interventions on the postoperative pain reduction and faster recovery from surgery. Fluid and pain-control protocols combined with an accurate blood management represent the key to success., Summary: A tailored approach to patients undergoing major spine surgeries seems to be effective improving the outcome and quality of life of patients. Future studies should aim to understand which elements of the ERAS can be improved to allow the patient to have a long-term good outcome. VIDEO ABSTRACT.

Background: Lumbar spinal surgery may be associated with electrophysiologic and hemodynamic abnormalities during the procedure., Case Description: A 58-year-old man with grade II L4-5 spondylolisthesis and degenerative changes underwent single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. During decompression of the L4 foramina, distraction of the disc space, and placement of the interbody cage and pedicle screws, episodes of extreme bradycardia with up to 5 seconds of asystole were detected on electrocardiogram and invasive hemodynamic monitoring. The events correlated with and possibly could have been a result of traction on the dura mater., Conclusions: Anesthesia providers should be aware of electrophysiologic and hemodynamic abnormalities during lumbar spinal surgery and the need to respond appropriately with sympathomimetic or vagolytic interventions., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: We evaluated blood pressure management associated with implantable pulse generator (IPG) procedure on same day (SD) versus different day (DD) from deep brain stimulation (DBS) placement., Methods: A retrospective chart review of 99 records for vasopressors given during IPG using a negative binomial regression model was performed. An association between SD versus DD, cumulative vasopressor dose, and minimum and maximum mean arterial pressure (MAP) were sought., Results: No significant association between SD versus DD DBS and the number of times vasopressors were given during stage II, estimated ratio of means (CI) of 1.8 (0.9-3.5); P = 0.07. Day of stage II had no association with the cumulative dose of vasopressor given during stage II, with an estimated difference in means (CI) of 2.4 (-0.4 to 5.3). The SD group had a significantly lower mean of minimum stage II MAP compared with DD, with an estimated difference in means (CI) of -10.5 (-17.4 to -3.5; P < 0.001). There was no association with maximum stage II MAP, with an estimated difference in means (CI) of -2.8 (-17.6 to 12.0; P = 0.63)., Conclusion: No difference in intraoperative vasopressor use was found between SD versus DD IPG placement, but the SD group had a significantly lower minimum MAP., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Anesthesia for craniotomies should blunt responses to noxious stimuli, whereas subsequently leaving patients sufficiently alert for early neurological evaluation. The aim was to compare postoperative blood pressure control, pain, and opioid requirement after anesthesia with dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil. We therefore tested 2 primary hypotheses: (1) intraoperative administration of dexmedetomidine provides better control of postoperative blood pressure than remifentanil; and (2) patients given dexmedetomidine have less postoperative pain and use less opioid., Materials and Methods: Adults having elective brain tumor excisions under balanced general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation were randomized to an infusion of remifentanil (0.08 to 0.15 μg/kg/min, n=71) or dexmedetomidine (0.2 to 0.7 μg/kg/h, n=68). Patients also received propofol, rocuronium, fentanyl, and sevoflurane. The mean arterial pressure (MAP) and pain were recorded at 15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 postoperative minutes. Outcomes were assessed with joint hypothesis testing, evaluating noninferiority and superiority., Results: Compared with remifentanil, the use of dexmedetomidine was associated with reduced postoperative MAP (88±12 vs. 98±11 mm Hg), with estimated mean difference (97.5% confidence interval) of -10 (-13, -4) mm Hg, P<0.001, and mean visual analog pain score (2.9±2.6 vs. 5.1±2.4 points), with estimated mean difference of -5 (-10, -3) points, P<0.001, and required less median opioid consumption (5 [0, 10] vs. 10 [7, 15] mg morphine equivalents), with estimated median difference of -5 (-10, -3) mg, P<0.001. Dexmedetomidine was both noninferior and superior to remifentanil in maintaining postoperative hemodynamics and providing improved pain control., Conclusions: Intraoperative dexmedetomidine better controlled postoperative MAP and provided superior analgesia in patients undergoing craniotomy.

Involvement of the Anesthesiologist in the early stages of care for acute ischemic stroke patient undergoing endovascular treatment is essential. Anesthetic management includes the anesthetic technique (general anesthesia vs sedation), a matter of much debate and an area in need of well-designed prospective studies. The large numbers of confounding factors make the design of such studies a difficult process. A universally agreed point in the endovascular management of acute ischemic stroke is the importance of decreasing the time to revascularization. Hemodynamic and ventilatory management and implementation of neuroprotective modalities and treatment of acute procedural complications are important components of the anesthetic plan., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Objective: Simulation-based learning is emerging as an alternative educational tool in this era of a relative shortfall of teaching anesthesiologists. The objective of the study is to assess whether screen-based (interactive computer simulated) case scenarios are more effective than problem-based learning discussions (PBLDs) in improving test scores 4 and 8 weeks after these interventions in anesthesia residents during their first neuroanesthesia rotation., Design: Prospective, nonblinded quasi-crossover study., Setting: Cleveland Clinic., Patients: Anesthesiology residents., Interventions: Two case scenarios were delivered from the Anesoft software as screen-based sessions, and parallel scripts were developed for 2 PBLDs. Each resident underwent both types of training sessions, starting with the PBLD session, and the 2 cases were alternated each month (ie, in 1 month, the screen-based intervention used case 1 and the PBLD used case 2, and vice versa for the next month)., Measurements: Test scores before the rotation (baseline), immediately after the rotation (4 weeks after the start of the rotation), and 8 weeks after the start of rotation were collected on each topic from each resident. The effect of training method on improvement in test scores was assessed using a linear mixed-effects model., Main Results: Compared to the departmental standard of PBLD, the simulation method did not improve either the 4- or 8-week mean test scores (P = .41 and P = .40 for training method effect on 4- and 8-week scores, respectively). Resident satisfaction with the simulation module on a 5-point Likert scale showed subjective evidence of a positive impact on resident education., Conclusions: Screen-based simulators were not more effective than PBLD for education during the neuroanesthesia rotation in anesthesia residency., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Cushing's disease is a condition rarely encountered during pregnancy. It is known that hypercortisolism is associated with increased maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. When hypercortisolism from Cushing's disease does occur in pregnancy, the impact of achieving biochemical remission on fetal outcomes is unknown. We sought to clarify the impact of successful surgical treatment by presenting such a case report., Case Description: A 38-year-old pregnant woman with recurrent Cushing's disease after 8 years of remission. The patient had endoscopic transsphenoidal of her pituitary adenoma in her 18(th) week of pregnancy. The patient had postoperative biochemical remission and normal fetal outcome with no maternal complications., Conclusion: Transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing's disease can be performed safely during the second trimester of pregnancy.

A 68-year-old woman with acute ischemic stroke presented for mechanical thrombectomy, after failed thrombolysis with intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator. The procedure was completed successfully with dexmedetomidine infusion. However, she developed acute angioedema toward the end of the procedure requiring emergent fiberoptic-guided endotracheal intubation. Angioedema has been reported to occur after administering intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator with an incidence of 1.3%-5.1% in patients with acute stroke., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Hypertension is common in deep brain stimulator (DBS) placement predisposing to intracranial hemorrhage. This retrospective review evaluates factors predicting incremental antihypertensive use intraoperatively. Medical records of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients undergoing DBS procedure between 2008-2011 were reviewed after Institutional Review Board approval. Anesthesia medication, preoperative levodopa dose, age, preoperative use of antihypertensive medications, diabetes mellitus, anxiety, motor part of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale score and PD duration were collected. Univariate and multivariate analysis was done between each patient characteristic and the number of antihypertensive boluses. From the 136 patients included 60 were hypertensive, of whom 32 were on angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), told to hold on the morning of surgery. Antihypertensive medications were given to 130 patients intraoperatively. Age (relative risk [RR] 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-1.02; p=0.005), high Joint National Committee (JNC) class (p<0.0001), diabetes mellitus (RR 1.4; 95%CI 1.2-17; p<0.0001) and duration of PD >10 years (RR 1.2; 95%CI 1.1-1.3; p=0.001) were independent predictors for antihypertensive use. No difference was noted in the mean dose of levodopa (p=0.1) and levodopa equivalent dose (p=0.4) between the low (I/II) and high severity (III/IV) JNC groups. Addition of dexmedetomidine to propofol did not influence antihypertensive boluses required (p=0.38). Intraoperative hypertension during DBS surgery is associated with higher age group, hypertensive, diabetic patients and longer duration of PD. Withholding ACEI or ARB is an independent predictor of hypertension requiring more aggressive therapy. Levodopa withdrawal and choice of anesthetic agent is not associated with higher intraoperative antihypertensive medications., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Patients with medically intractable epilepsy often undergo invasive evaluation and surgery, with a 50% success rate. The low success rate is likely due to poor identification of the epileptogenic zone (EZ), the brain area causing seizures. This work introduces a new method using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) with simultaneous direct electrical stimulation of the brain that could help localize the EZ, performed in five patients with medically intractable epilepsy undergoing invasive evaluation with intracranial depth electrodes. Stimulation occurred in a location near the hypothesized EZ and a location away. Electrical recordings in response to stimulation were recorded and compared to fMRI. Multiple stimulation parameters were varied, like current and frequency. The brain areas showing fMRI response were compared with the areas resected and the success of surgery. Robust fMRI maps of activation networks were easily produced, which also showed a significant but weak positive correlation between quantitative measures of blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) activity and measures of electrical activity in response to direct electrical stimulation (mean correlation coefficient of 0.38 for all acquisitions that produced a strong BOLD response). For four patients with outcome data at 6 months, successful surgical outcome is consistent with the resection of brain areas containing high local fMRI activity. In conclusion, this method demonstrates the feasibility of simultaneous direct electrical stimulation and fMRI in humans, which allows the study of brain connectivity with high resolution and full spatial coverage. This innovative technique could be used to better define the localization and extension of the EZ in intractable epilepsies, as well as for other functional neurosurgical procedures.

Background: Web-based delivery of educational material by scientific societies appears to have increased recently. However, the utilization of such efforts by the members of professional societies is unknown. We report the experience with delivery of educational resources on the Web site of the Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care (SNACC), and utilization of those resources by members., Methods: Three web-based educational initiatives were developed over 1 year to be disseminated through the SNACC Web site (http://www.snacc.org) for society members: (1) The SNACC Bibliography; (2) "Chat with the Author"; and (3) Clinical Case Discussions. Content experts and authors of important new research publications were invited to contribute. Member utilization data were abstracted with the help of the webmaster., Results: For the bibliography, there were 1175 page requests during the 6-month period after its launch by 122/664 (19%) distinct SNACC members. The bibliography was utilized by 107/553 (19%) of the active members and 15/91 (16.5%) of the trainee members. The "Chats with the Authors" were viewed by 56 (9%) members and the Clinical Case Discussions by 51 (8%) members., Conclusions: Educational resources can be developed in a timely manner utilizing member contributions without additional financial implications. However, the member utilization of these resources was lower than expected. These are first estimates of utilization of web-based educational resources by members of a scientific society. Further evaluation of such utilization by members of other societies as well as measures of the effectiveness and impact of such activities is needed.

The anesthetic plan for patients undergoing awake craniotomy, when compared to craniotomy under general anesthesia, is different, in that it requires changes in states of consciousness during the procedure. This retrospective review compares patients undergoing an asleep-awake-asleep technique for craniotomy (group AW: n = 101) to patients undergoing craniotomy under general anesthesia (group AS: n = 77). Episodes of desaturation (AW = 31% versus AS = 1%, p < 0.0001), although temporary, and hypercarbia (AW = 43.75 mmHg versus AS = 32.75 mmHg, p < 0.001) were more common in the AW group. The mean arterial pressure during application of head clamp pins and emergence was significantly lower in AW patients compared to AS patients (pinning 91.47 mmHg versus 102.9 mmHg, p < 0.05 and emergence 84.85 mmHg versus 105 mmHg, p < 0.05). Patients in the AW group required less vasopressors intraoperatively (AW = 43% versus AS = 69%, p < 0.01). Intraoperative fluids were comparable between the two groups. The post anesthesia care unit (PACU) administered significantly fewer intravenous opioids in the AW group. The length of stay in the PACU and hospital was comparable in both groups. Thus, asleep-awake-asleep craniotomies with propofol-dexmedetomidine infusion had less hemodynamic response to pinning and emergence, and less overall narcotic use compared to general anesthesia. Despite a higher incidence of temporary episodes of desaturation and hypoventilation, no adverse clinical consequences were seen., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Pregnancy may aggravate the natural history of an intracranial tumour, and may even unmask a previously unknown diagnosis. Here we present a series of seven patients who had brain tumours during pregnancy. The aim of this case series is to characterize the current perioperative management and to suggest evidence based guidelines for the anaesthetic management of pregnant females with brain tumours. This is a retrospective study. Information on pregnant patients diagnosed with brain tumours that underwent caesarean section (CS) and/or brain tumour resection from May 2003 through June 2008 was obtained from the Department of General Anaesthesia and the Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumour & Neuro-Oncology Centre (BBTC) at the Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA. The mean age was 34.5 years (range 29-40 years old). Six patients had glioma, two of whom had concomitant craniotomy and CS. Six cases had the tumour in the frontal lobe. Four cases were operated on under general anaesthesia and three underwent awake craniotomy. The neonatal outcomes of the six patients with elective or emergent delivery were six viable infants with normal Apgar scores. Pregnancy was terminated in the 7th patient. In conclusion, good knowledge of the variable anesthetic agents and their effects on the fetus is very important in managing those patients.

Standardization and accreditation of fellowship training have been considered in the field of neuroanesthesiology. A prior survey of members of the Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care (SNACC) suggested strong support for accreditation and standardization. In response, SNACC created a Task Force that developed curricular guidelines for neuroanesthesiology fellowship training programs. These guidelines represent a first step toward standards for neuroanesthesiology training and will be useful if accreditation is pursued in the future.

Technological advances have made it possible to seamlessly integrate modern neuroimaging into the neurosurgical operative environment. This integration has introduced many new applications improving surgical treatments. One major addition to the neurosurgical armamentarium is intraoperative navigation and MRI, enabling real-time use during surgery. In the 1970s, the American College of Radiology issued safety guidelines for diagnostic MRI facilities. Until now, however, no such guidelines existed for the MRI-integrated operating room, which is a high-risk zone requiring standardized protocols to ensure the safety of both the patient and the operating room staff. The forces associated with the strong 1.5- and 3.0-T magnets used for MRI are potent and hazardous, creating distinct concerns regarding safety, infection control, and image interpretation. Authors of this paper provide an overview of the intraoperative MRI operating room, safety considerations, and a series of checklists and protocols for maintaining safety in this zero tolerance environment.

Purpose of Review: Efforts in intra-arterial treatment of acute ischemic stroke mainly focus on new devices to reperfuse ischemic brain. Equally, if not more important is the anesthesiologists' role in controlling the consciousness level as well as anxiety, movement, airway and respiration and hemodynamic parameters and in a nutshell the safety of patients in a timely manner. We find paucity in studies designed to show the ideal method, level of anesthesia and optimal hemodynamic parameters for these. This review is designed to relate current thought process and debate on the best anesthetic method for this population., Recent Findings: The primary argument in literature regarding anesthetic management in acute ischemic stroke lies in the sedation level. The ongoing debate is whether general anesthesia is better than local anesthesia with or without sedation. Both sides bring their own argument, which seem legitimate but the bulk of the data are based on retrospective experiences rather than a well designed prospective randomized study. The definition of local vs. general anesthesia is still unclear. Retrospective studies mostly fail to identify cases that had to be converted to general anesthesia, which may influence the outcome. Less has been attributed to the importance of hemodynamic control which seems more important regardless of the anesthetic technique. The potential protective and harmful effect of the anesthetics used needs to be considered as well., Summary: Current literature review on anesthetic considerations of intra-arterial treatment of acute ischemic stroke emphasizes the need for well designed prospective studies to demonstrate the role of anesthetics in brain protection if any as well as define a suitable sedation method and guidelines for hemodynamic parameters.

Antiepileptic drugs (AED) are known to cause coagulation disturbances. We retrospectively analyzed the effect of AED on coagulation parameters in children who underwent craniotomy for epilepsy surgery. A total of 84 children were included. Perioperative coagulation parameters, the number and type of AED, estimated blood loss and the amount of blood products transfused were recorded. The most commonly used AED was lamotrigine. Of all patients, 7.1% were taking valproate. None of the patients showed significantly abnormal prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, or platelet count preoperatively. Thirty-eight percent of patients were transfused with allogeneic red blood cells and 4.7% of all patients showed significant coagulopathy intraoperatively and postoperatively. We concluded that the number of AED does not appear to be associated with preoperative coagulation disorders or blood transfusion requirements. However, caution should be taken in patients taking AED who undergo complex brain epilepsy surgery due to the potential for significant blood loss., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Despite new surgical methods and interventions a considerable number of patients who undergo neurovascular procedures emergently or electively have substantial mortality, morbidity, and disability. Sound knowledge of pathophysiology of cerebral hypoperfusion, reliable and timely information from monitoring devices, and appropriate choice of therapeutic intervention is essential for successful anesthetic management of these patients. The management of perioperative vasospasm and temporary ischemia during aneurysm clipping require an understanding of cerebral vascular pathophysiology and neuroprotective measures.

Cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage can decrease cerebral blood flow with the potential for stroke. Induction of Triple-H therapy (hypertension, hypervolemia, and hemodilution) is an accepted medical therapy to decrease the delayed cerebral ischemia related to vasospasm. Recently selective intra-arterial injection of nicardipine during angiography has also been proposed as a therapeutic modality for the management of distal vasospasm not amenable to balloon angioplasty. We are reporting the hemodynamic changes in 11 patients who underwent this procedure. A retrospective chart review of 15 procedures in 11 patients showed a significant change in blood pressure after the injection of nicardipine. Blood pressure changes were not different between sexes, but increase in heart rate was higher for females. A significantly higher drop in systolic blood pressure but not for diastolic blood pressure or mean arterial pressure after the injection was seen in patients who were not intubated in the intensive care unit before the procedure. Selective intra-arterial injection of nicardipine during angiography can cause significant hemodynamic instability and requires supportive management by the anesthesiologist.

Aim: Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is usually surgically created in a patient's upper extremity to provide adequate blood flow during haemodialysis. Blood flow distal to an AVF is altered and theoretically could change pulse oximetry (SpO2) reading, systemic blood pressure and skin temperature. The authors conducted a prospective case-control study to measure changes in these parameters in the upper extremity of patients who have had an AVF., Methods: In patients with an upper extremity AVF, the authors conducted a prospective case-control study using the patient's own non-AVF upper extremity as the control. The authors evaluated other factors that may have influenced blood flow changes distal to an AV fistula like gender, presence of AVF aneurysm, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes mellitus and vasodilator therapy., Results: Thirty patients were enrolled, skin temperature and blood pressure were significantly altered in the hand distal to the AVF, but there was no significant change in the SpO2., Conclusion: An upper extremity AVF alters blood pressure and temperature measurements when compared with the contralateral non-AVF side, but there is no difference in SpO2 provided an adequate signal quality is detected.

Unintentional intraoperative tracheal extubation can be potentially catastrophic, especially in patients with difficult airways. We describe a case in which extubation occurred during cervical spine decompression. Reintubation was facilitated with a Laryngeal Mask Airway and an Aintree intubation catheter.

For many anesthesiologists, awake fiberoptic endotracheal intubation (AFOBI) is the preferred method of intubation when treating patients with symptoms or signs of cervical spinal cord compression. The advantage of this method is to minimize cervical spine movements that could contribute to neurologic impairment. In patients who are anxious or poorly cooperative, adequate sedation in addition to topicalization of the airway may be key to minimize patient discomfort and assist in successful intubation, but imposes the risk of respiratory depression. Dexmedetomidine has the advantage of producing sedation without a significant decrease in respiratory drive. We are now reporting our experience of a series of AFOBI using dexmedetomidine for sedation. A retrospective chart review was conducted on the anesthetic records of patients, who had undergone an awake fiberoptic endotracheal intubation (AFOBI) using dexmedetomidine for sedation. These were patients in whom AFOBI was indicated because of signs or symptoms of cervical spinal cord compression. Dexmedetomidine provided adequate sedation. We did not encounter any loss of airway or airway obstruction during the intubation. The patients had excellent cooperation for post-intubation neurologic examination. Thirteen patients developed transient hypotension after induction of general anesthesia that was managed with boluses of phenylephrine or ephedrine.