Search

Objectives Pediatric palliative care services improve the quality of life for children with life-limiting and life-threatening diseases, although little has been published about variation based on cultural and religious factors. This article sets out to describe clinical and cultural characteristics of pediatric end-of-life patients in a majority Jewish and Muslim country with religious and legal constraints around end-of-life care. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of 78 pediatric patients who died during a 5-year period and could potentially have utilized pediatric palliative care services. Results Patients reflected a range of primary diagnoses, most commonly oncologic diseases and multisystem genetic disorders. Patients followed by the pediatric palliative care team had less invasive therapies, more pain management and advance directives, and more psychosocial support. Patients from different cultural and religious backgrounds had similar levels of pediatric palliative care team follow-up but certain differences in end-of-life care. Significance of results In a culturally and religiously conservative context that poses constraints on decision-making around end-of-life care, pediatric palliative care services are a feasible and important means of maximizing symptom relief, as well as emotional and spiritual support, for children at the end of life and their families.

To characterize the new SARS-Co-V-2 related multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) among Israeli children and to compare it with Kawasaki disease (KD). We compared, in two medical centers, the clinical and laboratory characteristics of MIS-C, KD and an intermediate group, which met the case definitions of both conditions. MIS-C patients were older, were more likely to be hypotensive, to have significant gastrointestinal symptoms, lymphopenia and thrombocytopenia and to have non-coronary abnormal findings in their echocardiogram. Lymphopenia was an independent predictor of MIS-C. Most of our MIS-C patients responded promptly to corticosteroid therapy. KD incidence in both centers was similar in 2019 and 2020. Although there is clinical overlap between KD and MIS-C, these are separate entities. Lymphopenia clearly differentiates between these entities. MIS-C patients may benefit from corticosteroids as first-line therapy.

Intraorbital infections may lead to severe complications, necessitating rapid diagnosis and intervention. The decision process regarding the need for emergent imaging and possible surgical intervention is unclear in the literature. This retrospective cohort study included two major pediatric emergency departments in Israel between 2010 and 2020. Patients arriving at the emergency department with an admission diagnosis of intraorbital infection and at least one high-risk symptom for orbital involvement were included in the study. The main outcome measures were the computerized tomography (CT) timing and results, whether the case was managed surgically or conservatively and whether the patient returned to the same hospital with significant complications. Ninety-five patients were included; 70 underwent a CT scan in the first 24 h, and of those 21 were managed surgically; 16 were treated based on clinical findings alone, with no imaging performed. When comparing groups based on management, we found no significant differences based on presenting symptoms, duration of complaints, or severity of CT findings. However, having three or more high-risk presenting symptoms was associated with a greater likelihood of surgical intervention (multivariate logistic regression p = 0.069, odds ratio 1.73, 95% confidence interval 0.96-3.11; one-way ANOVA and Fisher's exact test p 0.05).The decision to treat intraorbital infections at our institutions appears to be based on clinical impression of disease severity rather than radiologic findings. This suggests a need for further interdisciplinary studies to clarify optimal management.• Orbital c ellulitis is associated with significant potential complications, necessitating rapid diagnosis and treatment. • Present literature provides insufficiently clear guidance on emergency department management.• Consideration of all relevant factors (clinical features, laboratory findings, timing of imaging, and conservative vs. surgical management) in a single retrospective cohort. • Our findings suggest that decision-making in practice may be guided by clinical impression rather than imaging.