Search

Although prior literature has evaluated firework injuries broadly, there are no focused investigations examining trends, etiology, and costs associated with firework injuries to the hand. The 2006 to 2014 National Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) was used. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision ( ICD-9 ) codes identified patients presenting to the emergency department with a firework-related injury of the hand that resulted in a burn, open wound, fracture, blood vessel injury, or traumatic amputation. A linear regression model was used to identify significant changes over time, with a significance threshold of P Orthopedics . 2023;46(3):180–184.]

The current relative value units (RVU)-based system is built to reflect the varying presentation of ankle fractures (uni-malleolar vs bi-malleolar vs tri-malleolar) by assigning individual RVUs to different fracture complexities. However, no study has evaluated whether the current RVUs reflect an appropriate compensation per unit time following open reduction internal fixation for uni-malleolar versus bi-malleolar versus tri-malleolar ankle fractures. The 2012 to 2017 American College of Surgeons - National Surgical Quality Improvement Program files were queried using current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for patients undergoing open reduction internal fixation for uni-malleolar (CPT-27766,CPT-27769,CPT-27792), bi-malleolar (CPT-27814), and tri-malleolar (CPT-27822,CPT-27823) ankle fractures. A total of 7830 (37.2%) uni-malleolar, 7826 (37.2%) bi-malleolar and 5391 (25.6%) tri-malleolar ankle fractures were retrieved. Total RVUs, Mean RVU/minute and Reimbursement rate ($/min) and Mean Reimbursement/case for each fracture type were calculated and compared using Kruskal-Wallis tests. The mean total RVU for each fracture type was as follows: (1) Uni-malleolar: 9.99, (2) Bi-malleolar = 11.71 and 3) Tri-malleolar = 12.87 (p.001). A statistically significant difference was noted in mean operative time (uni-malleolar = 63.2 vs bi-malleolar = 78.6 vs tri-malleolar = 95.5; p.001) between the 3 groups. Reimbursement rates ($/min) decreased significantly as fracture complexity increased (uni-malleolar = $7.21/min vs bi-malleolar = $6.75/min vs tri-malleolar = $6.10; p.001). The average reimbursement/case was $358, $420, and $462 for uni-malleolar, bi-malleolar and tri-malleolar fractures respectively. Footankle surgeons are reimbursed at a higher rate ($/min) for treating a simple uni-malleolar fracture as compared to bi-malleolar and tri-malleolar fractures, despite the higher complexity and longer operative times seen in the latter. The study highlights the need of a change in the RVUs for bi-malleolar and tri-malleolar ankle fractures to ensure that surgeons are adequately reimbursed per unit time for treating a more complex fracture case.

BACKGROUND Emergency general surgery (EGS) presents a challenge for frail, geriatric individuals who often have extensive comorbidities affecting postoperative recovery. Previous studies have shown an association between increasing frailty and adverse outcomes following elective and EGS; no study has explored the same for the geriatric patient population using the modified 5-item frailty index (mFI-5) score. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective cohort study was performed using the 2012-2017 American College of Surgeons - National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to identify geriatric patients (≥65 years) undergoing EGS procedures within 48 h of admission. The previously validated mFI-5 score was used to assess preoperative frailty. The study cohort was divided into four groups: mFI-5 = 0, mFI-5 = 1, mFI-5 = 2, and mFI-5 ≥ 3; the impact of increasing mFI-5 score on failure-to-rescue (FTR), 30-day complications, readmissions, reoperations, and mortality was assessed. RESULTS A total of 47,216 patients were included: 27.4% with mFI-5 = 0, 45% with mFI-5 = 1, 22.1% with mFI-5 = 2, and 5.5% with mFI-5 ≥ 3. Following multivariate analyses, increasing mFI-5 score was associated with higher odds of FTR (mFI-5 = 1: odds ratio (OR) 1.48, p=0.003; mFI-5 = 2: OR 2.66, p

In 2020, total hip arthroplasty (THA) was removed from the inpatient-only list by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The objective was to analyze outpatient THA in the Medicare population to understand incidence of failed same-day discharge (SDD) and risk factors for complications and extended length of stay (LOS). The 2015–2019 American College of Surgeons—National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for Medicare patients (≥ 65 years) undergoing outpatient THA. Short-term complications, LOS, and discharge destination were evaluated. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate risk factors for complications, failed SDD, reoperation, readmission, and non-home discharge disposition. Overall, 2,063 THAs were included. Complication rate was 7.4%. The number of patients staying in the hospital ≥ 1 day was 1,080 (52%). A total of 151 patients (7.3%) experienced a non-home discharge. Predictors for having any complication was an extended LOS ≥ 1 day (odds ratio [OR] 2.86), p II (OR 1.67), and age ≥ 71 (OR 1.31) (all p ≤ 0.004). Significant predictors for a non-home discharge were LOS ≥ 1 day (OR 13.71), American Society of Anesthesiologists Class > II (OR 2.36), age ≥ 71 (OR 2.07), operative time ≥ 82 minutes (OR 1.88), and female gender (OR 1.81), all p ≤ 0.003. The current study identifies the incidence, risk factors, and clinical impact of postoperative complications and prolonged LOS in Medicare-aged patients undergoing outpatient THA. Providers should consider preoperatively risk stratifying patients to reduce the costs associated with extended LOS, complication, and unplanned discharge destination.

Introduction The U.S. News & World Report (USNWR) hospital rankings remain the most publicly referenced system for identifying top hospitals for each specialty. The current study aims to evaluate whether there are any differences in outcomes and costs for patients undergoing anatomic TSA (ATSA) or reverse TSA (RTSA) for degenerative pathologies at ranked vs. non–ranked hospitals. Methods The 2011-2014 USNWR hospital rankings were used to identify ranked hospitals in “Orthopedics.” The 2011-2014 100% Medicare Standard Analytical Files (SAF100) were used to identify patients undergoing ATSA or RTSA for degenerative arthritis. The study cohort was divided into two groups, based on whether patients received surgery at a ranked hospital vs. a non–ranked hospital. Multi-variate logistic and linear regression analyses were used to assess for differences in 90-day outcomes and costs between ranked and non–ranked hospitals, while controlling for potential co-variates/confounders. Results A total of 82,417 TSA were included in the study – out of which 8,868 (10.8%) were performed in one of the 68 hospitals that were ranked by the USNWR between 2011 and 2014. Following adjustment for baseline demographics, and clinical characteristics, there were no statistically significant differences between ranked vs. non–ranked hospitals, with regards to rates of infectious complications (0.8% vs. 1.0%, OR 0.91 [95% CI 0.82-1.01]; P = .079), dislocations (0.8% vs. 0.9%, OR 1.07 [95% CI 0.79-1.43]; P = .658), peri-prosthetic fractures (0.3% vs. 0.3%, OR 0.77 [95% CI 0.47-1.21]; P = .269), pulmonary embolism (0.7% vs. 0.8%, OR 0.88 [95% CI 0.64-1.20]; P = .435), deep venous thrombosis (1.1% vs. 0.9%, OR 1.21 [95% CI 0.93-1.56]; P = .153), myocardial infarction (0.4% vs. 0.5%, OR 1.00 [95% CI 0.67-1.46]; P = .995), sepsis (6.0% vs. 7.3%, OR 0.95 [95% CI 0.85-1.05]; P = .314), urinary tract infections (4.8% vs. 5.6%, OR 0.99 [95% CI 0.87-1.11]; P = .831) and readmissions (7.1% vs. 8.3%, OR 0.91 [95% CI 0.82-1.01]; P = .079). Ranked hospitals, however, did have higher risk-adjusted charges (+ $6,167; P Conclusion Based on our findings, patients undergoing TSA at ranked hospitals vs. non–ranked hospitals have similar outcomes, despite the former facilities having higher costs and charges across the episode of care. Level of Evidence Level III

Background Impact of resident participation on short-term postoperative outcomes after total elbow arthroplasty has not been studied. The aim was to investigate whether resident participation affects postoperative complication rates, operative time, and length of stay. Methods The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program registry was queried from 2006 to 2012 for patients undergoing total elbow arthroplasty. A 1:1 propensity score match was performed to match resident cases to attending-only cases. Comorbidities, surgical time, and short-term (30-day) postoperative complications were compared between groups. Multivariate Poisson regression was used to compare the rates of postoperative adverse events between groups. Results After propensity score match, 124 cases (50% with resident participation) were included. Adverse event rate after surgery was 18.5%. On multivariate analysis, there were no significant differences between attending-only cases and resident involved cases, with regards to short-term major complications, minor complications, or any complications (all p > 0.071). Total operative time was similar between cohorts (149.16 vs. 165.66 min; p = 0.157). No difference was observed in the length of hospital stay (2.95 vs. 2.6 days), p = 0.399. Discussion Resident participation during total elbow arthroplasty is not associated with increased risk for short-term medical or surgical postoperative complications or operative efficiency.

Objective To evaluate medical and surgical complication rates between robotic-assisted versus conventional elective posterior lumbar fusions. Methods The Symphony Integrated DataVerse was queried using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition, Clinical Modification procedure codes to identify patients undergoing elective posterior lumbar fusions for degenerative spine pathologies between 2015 and 2018. International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition, Clinical Modification procedure codes (8E0W4CZ, 8E0W0CZ, 8E0W3CZ) were used to identify patients undergoing a robotic-assisted spinal fusion. Outcome measures were 90-day medical and surgical complications, 1-year pseudarthrosis, and 1-year revision surgery rates. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess whether undergoing a robotic-assisted fusion (vs. conventional fusion) was associated with differences in wound complications, medical complications, pseudarthrosis, revision surgery, and readmissions within 90 days of surgery. Results A total of 39,387 patients undergoing elective posterior lumbar fusions were included in the cohort—of whom 245 (0.62%) patients underwent a robotic-assisted fusion. Multivariate analysis showed that robotic-assisted fusion (vs. conventional fusion) was not associated with significant differences in 90-day rates of wound complications (P = 0.299), urinary tract infections (P = 0.648), acute myocardial infarctions (P = 0.209), acute renal failure (P = 0.461), pneumonia (P = 0.214), stroke (P = 0.917), deep venous thrombosis (P = 0.562), pulmonary embolism (P = 0.401), and readmissions (P = 0.985). In addition, there were no significant differences in the 1-year rates of revision fusions (P = 0.316) and pseudarthrosis (P = 0.695). Conclusions Patients who underwent a robotic-assisted fusion had similar rates of surgical and medical complications compared with those who underwent a conventional fusion. Further studies are warranted to better understand the future role of robots in spine surgery.

Objective To understand trends and variability of procedures performed by orthopedic spine surgery fellows during training. Design Cross-sectional survey. Setting Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) case logs. Participants Fellows enrolled in ACGME-accredited “Orthopaedic Surgery of the Spine” fellowships from 2010 to 2015. Results The 2010 to 2015 ACGME fellowship case logs for “Orthopaedic Surgery of the Spine” were retrieved. Spine cases in case logs are grouped into the following categories: (1) Excision, (2) Osteotomy, (3) Fracture and/or Dislocation, (4) Decompression, (5) Anterior fusion/arthrodesis, (6) Posterior fusion, (7) Deformity surgery, (8) Exploration, (9) Instrumentation, and (10) other/uncategorized. The total number of spine cases logged by each fellow increased from 821 in 2010 to 1134 in 2015 (38.2% increase). The greatest increases were noted from fracture/dislocation cases (77.9%), followed by posterior fusions (62.2%), anterior fusions (43.6%), decompressions (36.3%), and instrumentation (29.5%). The average number of deformity cases decreased from 23 in 2010 to 19 in 2016 (18.6% decrease). The average number of adult-only cases increased from 770 in 2010 to 1100 in 2015 (42.8% increase), whereas the average number of pediatric-only cases declined from 51 in 2010 to 35 in 2015 (32.1% decrease). Based on case logs from 2015, the greatest variation in case volume between the 10th centile and 90th centile of fellows was noted for deformity cases, followed by decompressions and posterior fusions. Conclusions Even though there has been a 38% increase in the overall number of spine cases performed by fellows during training, a large amount of variation in type of case exposure exists between fellowships. The findings of our study call for the establishment of minimal case volumes and/or uniformity of training spectrums across the nation to ensure appropriate surgical care is made accessible to all patients.

STUDY DESIGN Retrospective observational study. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate whether there are any differences in outcomes and costs for elective one- to three-level anterior cervical fusions (ACFs) performed at US News and World Report (USNWR) ranked and unranked hospitals. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Although the USNWR rankings are advertised by media and are routinely used by patients as a guide in seeking care, evidence regarding whether these rankings are reflective of actual clinical outcome remains limited. METHODS The 2010-2014 USNWR hospital rankings were used to identify ranked hospitals in "Neurosurgery" and "Orthopedics." The 2010-2014 100% Medicare Standard Analytical Files (SAF100) were used to identify patients undergoing elective ACFs at ranked and unranked hospitals. Multivariable logistic regression and generalized linear regression analyses were used to assess for differences in 90-day outcomes and costs between ranked and unranked hospitals. RESULTS A total of 110,520 patients undergoing elective one- to three-level ACFs were included in the study, of which 10,289 (9.3%) underwent surgery in one of the 100 ranked hospitals. Following multivariate analysis, there were no significant differences between ranked versus unranked hospitals with regards to wound complications (1.2% vs. 1.1%; P = 0.907), cardiac complications (12.9% vs. 11.9%; P = 0.055), pulmonary complications (3.7% vs. 6.7%; P = 0.654), urinary tract infections (7.3% vs. 5.8%; P = 0.120), sepsis (9.3% vs. 7.9%; P = 0.847), deep venous thrombosis (1.9% vs. 1.3%; P = 0.077), revision surgery (0.3% vs. 0.3%; P = 0.617), and all-cause readmissions (4.7% vs. 4.4%; P = 0.266). Ranked hospitals, as compared to unranked hospitals, had a slightly lower odds of experiencing renal complications (7.0% vs. 4.9%; P = 0.047), but had significantly higher risk-adjusted 90-day charges (+$17,053; P

Study design This was a national database study. Objective The objective of this study was to assess the impact of prior bariatric surgery (BS) on altering 90-day postoperative outcomes following elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusions (ACDFs). Summary of background data Though obesity has previously been shown to be linked with adverse outcomes following elective spine surgical procedures, the effectiveness of weight-loss strategies such as BS has not been explored. Methods The PearlDiver program was used to query the 2007-2013 100% Medicare Standard Analytical Files (SAF100) for patients undergoing an elective ACDF. The study cohort was divided into 2 groups-(1) obese ACDF patients (body mass index ≥35 kg/m) receiving a BS procedure within 2 years before an ACDF and (2) obese ACDF patients (body mass index ≥35 kg/m) without a known history of a BS procedure within the last 2 years. Multivariate regression analyses were used to assess the impact of a BS procedure on postoperative outcomes following ACDF while adjusting for age, sex, region, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. Results A total of 411 ACDF patients underwent BS within the 2 years before an ACDF. Multivariate analysis showed that undergoing BS before an elective ACDF was associated with a significantly reduced risk of pulmonary complications [odds ratio (OR)=0.53; P=0.002], cardiac complications (OR=0.69; P=0.012), sepsis (OR=0.69; P=0.035), renal complications (OR=0.54; P=0.044), and 90-day readmissions (OR=0.53; P=0.015). Conclusions Surgery-induced weight loss before an ACDF in obese patients is associated with reduced 90-day complication and readmission rates. Orthopaedic and bariatric surgeons should counsel obese patients on the benefits of BS following ACDFs.

Purpose To evaluate trends in Medicare physician reimbursements for 20 common hand procedures/surgeries from 2002 to 2018. Methods The Physician Fee Schedule Look-up Tool was used to retrieve average reimbursement rates for 20 common hand surgeries/procedures from 2002 to 2018. All reimbursement data were adjusted for inflation to 2018 dollars. Results After adjusting all data for inflation, the average reimbursement for all included procedures decreased by 20.9% from 2002 to 2018, with a compound annual growth rate of –3.25%. Reimbursement percentage decreases were the greatest prior to 2010 (18.4% decrease), followed by a relative stabilization (0.94% increase) from 2010 to 2014, after which physicians experienced a decrease of 3.9% in reimbursements between 2014 and 2018, following implementation of the Medicare Access and Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act in 2015. The most significant decreases in reimbursements over time were noted for primary tendon/muscle repair (–49.6%), wrist arthroscopy for triangular fibrocartilage repair/debridement (–44.0%), trigger finger release in facility (–40.1%), excision of extensor tendon sheath (–38.2%), ganglion cyst excision (–36.7%), wrist arthroscopy for diagnostic/synovial biopsy (–35.7%), wrist arthroscopy for drainage/infection/lavage (–35.1%), wrist arthrodesis (–30.6%), endoscopic carpal tunnel release (–27.2%), total wrist arthroplasty (–26.6%), carpometacarpal/basal joint arthroplasty (–25.1%), and open carpal tunnel release (–22.3%). The only procedures with a significant increase in reimbursement over time were trigger finger release in office (+4.2%), open reduction internal fixation distal radius fracture (+2.5%), and cubital tunnel release (+1.5%). Conclusions After adjusting for inflation, Medicare physician reimbursements for a major proportion of hand surgical procedures have decreased over time. Clinical relevance Health-policy makers need to understand the impact of decreasing reimbursements to develop policies of reimbursements that will not only ensure provider satisfaction but also maintain access to care for patients.

Study design Retrospective cohort. Objective To identify gaps in opioid prescription immediately prior to spinal fusion and to study the effect of such simulated "opioid weaning/elimination" on risk of long-term postoperative opioid use. Summary of background data Numerous studies have described preoperative opioid duration and dose thresholds associated with sustained postoperative opioid use. However, the benefit and duration of preoperative opioid weaning before spinal fusion has not been elaborated. Methods Humana commercial insurance data (2007-Q1 2017) was used to study primary cervical and lumbar/thoracolumbar fusions. More than 5000 total morphine equivalents in the year before spinal fusion were classified as chronic preoperative opioid use. Based on time between last opioid prescription ( 2-months gap (2G) and >3-months gap (3G). Primary outcome measure was long-term postoperative opioid use (>5000 total morphine equivalents between 3 and 12-mo postoperatively). The effect of "opioid gap" on risk of long-term postoperative opioid use was studied using multiple-variable logistic regression analyses. Results 17,643 patients were included, of whom 3590 (20.3%) had chronic preoperative opioid use. Of these patients, 41 (1.1%) were in the 3G group and 106 (3.0%) were in the 2G group. In the 2G group, 53.8% patients ceased to have long-term postoperative use as compared with 27.8% in NG group. This association was significant on logistic regression analysis (OR 0.30, 95% CI: 0.20-0.46, P Conclusions Chronic opioid users whose last opioid prescription was >2-months prior to spinal fusion and less than 14-days' supply had significantly lower risk of long-term postoperative opioid use. We have simulated "opioid weaning" in chronic opioid users undergoing major spinal fusion and our analysis provides an initial reference point for current clinical practice and future clinical studies.Level of Evidence: 3.

Background Context Due to financial pressures associated with healthcare reforms, an increasing number of hospitals are now merging (or consolidating) into networks (or systems). However, it remains unclear how these mergers or network participations affect quality of care and/or costs. Purpose The current study aims to evaluate the impact of hospital network participation on 90-day complications, charges and costs following elective posterior lumbar fusions (PLFs). Study Design Retrospective review of a 100% national sample of Medicare claims from 2010-2014 (SAF100). Study Sample All Medicare-eligible patients undergoing elective 1-to-3 level posterior lumbar fusions for degenerative lumbar pathology from 2010 to 2014. Outcome measures Ninety-day complications, charges and costs. Methods The 2010-2014 100% Medicare Standard Analytical Files (SAF100) was used to identify patients undergoing elective 1-to-3 level posterior lumbar fusions for degenerative lumbar pathology. The Dartmouth Atlas for Healthcare hospital-level data, which uses a combination of American Hospital Association and additional source data, was used to identify hospitals that were part of a network (or system) between 2010 and 2014. The study sample was divided into two cohorts (network hospitals and non-network hospitals) for analyses. Multi-variate logistic regression models were used to compare differences in 90-day complications between network and non-network hospitals, while controlling for baseline demographics (age, gender, region, year of surgery, median household income, co-morbidity burden) and hospital-level characteristics (case volume, teaching status, urban/rural location and hospital ownership). Generalized linear regression modeling was used to assess for differences in 90-day charges and costs. Results A total of 145,141 patients undergoing surgery in 2,186 hospitals were included in the study, out of which 107,919 (74.4%) underwent surgery in a network hospital (N=1,526). Network hospitals were more prevalent in the South or West regions of the United States. Patients in network hospitals had a median household income less than the 5th quintile. Network hospitals were also more likely to have a higher annual case volume of elective 1- to 3-level PLFs, greater number of beds, be located in an urban location, and have a voluntary/non-profit or proprietary/profit ownership model. Multi-variate analyses showed that even though patients undergoing surgery at network hospitals (vs. non-network hospitals) had a slightly increased odds of 90-day cardiac complications (7.9% vs. 7.4%, OR 1.07 [95% CI 1.02-1.12]; p=0.010), thromboembolic complications (2.4% vs. 2.2%, OR 1.12 [95% CI 1.01-1.20]; p=0.025) and emergency department visits (16.4% vs. 16.0%, OR 1.06 [95% CI 1.02-1.09]; p=0.002), the differences would not be considered clinically significant. Despite a slight decrease in risk-adjusted 90-day reimbursements (-$272), the risk-adjusted 90-day charges were actually significantly higher (+ $9,959; p Conclusions Even though hospitals that are part of a network do not appear to have significantly different complication rates following elective PLFs, they do have significantly higher risk-adjusted charges as compared to non-network hospitals. Further research is required to understand market-level changes induced by hospital mergers into networks.

Introduction: With limited evidence on national incidences of hip arthroscopy in the elderly population, the current study aims to investigate trends of primary hip arthroscopies being performed in the elderly population, using the US Medicare database, and determine risk factors for conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods: Medicare Standard Analytic Files were queried using CPT codes to retrieve records of primary hip arthroscopies done for degenerative pathology during 2005–2014. Overall and age-stratified trends in the incidence of hip arthroscopy over time were analysed. Kaplan Meier survival curves were used to assess the overall 2-year conversion rate to a THA. Cox regression analysis was implemented to study risk factors for conversion. Results: 8100 primary hip arthroscopies for degenerative pathology were performed during 2005–2014. There was a 280% increase in overall incidence of arthroscopy. The most commonly performed arthroscopic procedure was for chondroplasty and/or resection of labrum, with 4712 (58.1%) procedures. Around 18.5% patients underwent arthroplasty within 2 years after primary arthroscopy. Following Cox regression an existing diagnosis of osteoarthritis, ages 65–69, ages 70–74, and arthroscopies done in the West were associated with higher risk of conversion to THA within 2 years. Undergoing a repeat arthroscopy was not significantly associated with a higher risk of conversion. Conclusions: Despite inconclusive clinical evidence, hip arthroscopies are being increasingly used in patients older than 65 in the Medicare population. We conclude that patients in the age bracket of 65–74 years and with a pre-existing diagnosis of osteoarthritis, arthroscopy should be approached with caution.

BACKGROUND: Critical access hospitals (CAHs) play an important role in providing access to care for many patients in rural communities. Prior studies have shown that these facilities are able to provide timely and quality care for patients who undergo various elective and emergency general surgical procedures. However, little is known about the quality and reimbursement of surgical care for patients undergoing surgery for hip fractures at CAHs compared with non-CAH facilities. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Are there any differences in 90-day complications, readmissions, mortality, and Medicare payments between patients undergoing surgery for hip fractures at CAHs and those undergoing surgery at non-CAHs? METHODS: The 2005 to 2014 Medicare 100% Standard Analytical Files were queried using ICD-9 procedure codes to identify Medicare-eligible beneficiaries undergoing open reduction and internal fixation (79.15, 79.35, and 78.55), hemiarthroplasty (81.52), and THA (81.51) for isolated closed hip fractures. This database was selected because the claims capture inpatient diagnoses, procedures, charged amounts and paid claims, as well as hospital-level information of the care, of Medicare patients across the nation. Patients with concurrent fixation of an upper extremity, lower extremity, and/or polytrauma were excluded from the study to ensure an isolated cohort of hip fractures was captured. The study cohort was divided into two groups based on where the surgery took place: CAHs and non-CAHs. A 1:1 propensity score match, adjusting for baseline demographics (age, gender, Census Bureau-designated region, and Elixhauser comorbidity index), clinical characteristics (fixation type and time to surgery), and hospital characteristics (whether the hospital was located in a rural ZIP code, the average annual procedure volume of the operating facility, hospital bed size, hospital ownership and teaching status), was used to control for the presence of baseline differences in patients presenting at CAHs and those presenting at non-CAHs. A total of 1,467,482 patients with hip fractures were included, 29,058 of whom underwent surgery in a CAH. After propensity score matching, each cohort (CAH and non-CAH) contained 29,058 patients. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess for differences in 90-day complications, readmissions, and mortality between the two matched cohorts. As funding policies of CAHs are regulated by Medicare, an evaluation of costs-of-care (by using Medicare payments as a proxy) was conducted. Generalized linear regression modeling was used to assess the 90-day Medicare payments among patients undergoing surgery in a CAH, while controlling for differences in baseline demographics and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Patients undergoing surgery for hip fractures were less likely to experience many serious complications at a critical access hospital (CAH) than at a non-CAH. In particular, after controlling for patient demographics, hospital-level factors and procedural characteristics, patients treated at a CAH were less likely to experience: myocardial infarction (3% (916 of 29,058) versus 4% (1126 of 29,058); OR 0.80 [95% CI 0.74 to 0.88]; p < 0.001), sepsis (3% (765 of 29,058) versus 4% (1084 of 29,058); OR 0.69 [95% CI 0.63 to 0.78]; p < 0.001), acute renal failure (6% (1605 of 29,058) versus 8% (2353 of 29,058); OR 0.65 [95% CI 0.61 to 0.69]; p < 0.001), and Clostridium difficile infections (1% (367 of 29,058) versus 2% (473 of 29,058); OR 0.77 [95% CI 0.67 to 0.88]; p < 0.001) than undergoing surgery in a non-CAH. CAHs also had lower rates of all-cause 90-day readmissions (18% (5133 of 29,058) versus 20% (5931 of 29,058); OR 0.83 [95% CI 0.79 to 0.86]; p < 0.001) and 90-day mortality (4% (1273 of 29,058) versus 5% (1437 of 29,058); OR 0.88 [95% CI 0.82 to 0.95]; p = 0.001) than non-CAHs. Further, CAHs also had risk-adjusted lower 90-day Medicare payments than non-CAHs (USD 800, standard error 89; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients who received hip fracture surgical care at CAHs had a lower risk of major medical and surgical complications than those who had surgery at non-CAHs, even though Medicare reimbursements were lower as well. Although there may be some degree of patient selection at CAHs, these facilities appear to provide high-value care to rural communities. These findings provide evidence for policymakers evaluating the impact of the CAH program and allocating funding resources, as well as for community members seeking emergent care at local CAH facilities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

BACKGROUND Treatment of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas can be costly, and therefore, it is not surprising that insurance status of patients is a prognostic factor in determining overall survival. Furthermore, uninsured individuals with suspected bone and/or soft-tissue masses routinely encounter difficulty in obtaining access to basic healthcare (such as office visits, radiology scans), and therefore are more likely to be diagnosed with later stages at presentation. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) mandate of 2010 aimed to increase access to care for uninsured individuals by launching initiatives, such as expanding Medicaid eligibility, subsidizing private insurance, and developing statewide mandates requiring individuals to have a prescribed minimum level of health insurance. Although prior reports have demonstrated that the ACA increased both coverage and the proportion of early-stage diagnoses among patients with common cancers (including breast, colon, prostate, and lung), it is unknown whether similar improvements have occurred for patients with bone and soft-tissue sarcomas. Understanding changes in insurance coverages and stage at diagnosis of patients with bone and soft-tissue sarcomas would be paramount in establishing policies that will ensure orthopaedic cancer care is made equitable and accessible to all. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES (1) Has the introduction of the ACA been associated with changes in insurance coverage for adult patients with newly diagnosed bone and soft-tissue sarcomas? (2) Did the introduction of health reforms under the ACA lead to an increased proportion of sarcoma diagnoses occurring at earlier disease stages? METHODS The 2007 to 2015 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database was queried using International Classification of Diseases for Oncology codes for primary malignant bone tumors of the upper and lower extremity (C40.0 to C40.3), unspecified or other overlapping bone, articular cartilage, and joint and/or ribs, sternum, or clavicle (C40.8 to C40.9, C41.3, and C41.8 to C41.9), vertebral column (C41.2), pelvis (C41.4, C41.8, and C41.9), and soft-tissue sarcomas of the upper or lower extremity and/or pelvis (C49.1, C49.2, and C49.5). A total of 15,287 patients with newly diagnosed cancers were included, of which 3647 (24%) were malignant bone tumors and 11,640 (76%) were soft-tissue sarcomas. The study sample was divided into three cohorts according to specified time periods: pre-ACA from 2007 to 2010 (6537 patients), pre-Medicaid expansion from 2011 to 2013 (5076 patients), and post-Medicaid expansion from 2014 to 2015 (3674 patients). The Pearson chi square tests were used to assess for changes in the proportion of Medicaid and uninsured patients across the specified time periods: pre-ACA, pre-expansion and post-expansion. A differences-in-differences analysis was also performed to assess changes in insurance coverage for Medicaid and uninsured patients among states that chose to expand Medicaid coverage in 2014 under the ACA's provision versus those who opted out of Medicaid expansion. Since the database switched to using the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) 7th edition staging system in 2010, linear regression using data only from 2010 to 2015 was performed that assessed changes in cancer stage at diagnosis from 2010 to 2015 alone. After stratifying by cancer type (bone or soft-tissue sarcoma), Pearson chi square tests were used to assess for changes in the proportion of patients who were diagnosed with early, late, and unknown stage at presentation before Medicaid expansion (2011-2013) and after Medicaid expansion (2014-2015) among states that chose to expand versus those who did not. RESULTS After stratifying by time cohorts: pre-ACA (2007 to 2010), pre-expansion (2011 to 2013) and post-expansion (2014 to 2015), we observed that the most dramatic changes occurred after Medicaid eligibility was expanded (2014 onwards), with Medicaid proportions increasing from 12% (pre-expansion, 2011 to 2013) to 14% (post-expansion, 2014 to 2015) (p < 0.001) and uninsured proportions decreasing from 5% (pre-expansion, 2011 to 2013) to 3% (post-expansion, 2014 to 2015) (p < 0.001). A differences-in-differences analysis that assessed the effect of Medicaid expansion showed that expanded states had an increase in the proportion of Medicaid patients compared with non-expanded states, (3.6% [95% confidence interval 0.4 to 6.8]; p = 0.03) from 2014 onwards. For the entire study sample, the proportion of early-stage diagnoses (I/II) increased from 56% (939 of 1667) in 2010 to 62% (1137 of 1840) in 2015 (p = 0.003). Similarly, the proportion of unknown stage diagnoses decreased from 11% (188 of 1667) in 2010 to 7% (128 of 1840) in 2015 (p = 0.002). There was no change in proportion of late-stage diagnoses (III/IV) from 32% (540 of 1667) in 2010 to 31% (575 of 1840) in 2015 (p = 0.13). CONCLUSION Access to cancer care for patients with primary bone or soft-tissue sarcomas improved after the ACA was introduced, as evidenced by a decrease in the proportion of uninsured patients and corresponding increase in Medicaid coverage. Improvements in coverage were most significant among states that adopted the Medicaid expansion of 2014. Furthermore, we observed an increasing proportion of early-stage diagnoses after the ACA was implemented. The findings support the preservation of the ACA to ensure cancer care is equitable and accessible to all vulnerable patient populations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, therapeutic study.

Background The current Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services diagnosis-related group (DRG) bundled-payment model for upper-extremity arthroplasty does not differentiate between the type of arthroplasty (anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty [ATSA] vs. reverse total shoulder arthroplasty vs. total elbow arthroplasty [TEA] vs. total wrist arthroplasty) or the diagnosis and indication for surgery (fracture vs. degenerative osteoarthritis vs. inflammatory arthritis). Methods The 2011-2014 Medicare 5% Standard Analytical Files (SAF5) database was queried to identify patients undergoing upper-extremity arthroplasty under DRG-483 and -484. Multivariate linear regression modeling was used to assess the marginal cost impact of patient-, procedure-, diagnosis-, and state-level factors on 90-day reimbursements. Results Of 6101 patients undergoing upper-extremity arthroplasty, 3851 (63.1%) fell under DRG-484 and 2250 (36.9%) were classified under DRG-483. The 90-day risk-adjusted cost of an ATSA for degenerative osteoarthritis was $14,704 ± $655. Patient-level factors associated with higher 90-day reimbursements were male sex (+$777), age 75-79 years (+$740), age 80-84 years (+$1140), and age 85 years or older (+$984). Undergoing a TEA (+$2175) was associated with higher reimbursements, whereas undergoing a shoulder hemiarthroplasty (–$1000) was associated with lower reimbursements. Surgery for a fracture (+$2354) had higher 90-day reimbursements. Malnutrition (+$10,673), alcohol use or dependence (+$6273), Parkinson disease (+$4892), cerebrovascular accident or stroke (+$4637), and hyper-coagulopathy (+$4463) had the highest reimbursements. In general, states in the South and Midwest had lower 90-day reimbursements associated with upper-extremity arthroplasty. Conclusions Under the DRG-based model piloted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, providers and hospitals would be reimbursed the same amount regardless of the type of surgery (ATSA vs. hemiarthroplasty vs. TEA), patient comorbidity burden, and diagnosis and indication for surgery (fracture vs. degenerative pathology), despite each of these factors having different resource utilization and associated reimbursements. Lack of risk adjustment for fracture indications leads to strong financial disincentives within this model.

Background There has been a considerable rise in the number of musculoskeletal/orthopaedic oncology fellowships and subsequently, orthopaedic oncologists, in the nation. National societies have been concerned that the increasing number of orthopaedic oncologists, coupled with a limited number of patients with bone and soft-tissue sarcomas in the country, may have led to an unintended impact on the training spectrum and/or exposure of orthopaedic oncology fellows-in-training over time. Fellows who are unable to gain exposure by operating on varied cancer presentations during training may be less confident in dealing with a wide array of patients in their practice. Despite these concerns, the volume and variability of procedures performed by fellows-in-training remains unknown. Understanding these parameters will be helpful in establishing policies for standardizing training of prospective fellows to ensure they are well-equipped to care for patients with bone and/or soft-tissue sarcomas in the beginning of their career. Questions/purposes (1) Has the median surgical procedure volume per fellow changed over time? (2) How much variability in procedural volume exists between fellows, based on the most recent (2017) Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) procedure log data? (3) What proportion of fellows are meeting the minimum procedure volume thresholds, as recommended by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS)? Methods The 2010 to 2017 ACGME fellowship procedure logs for musculoskeletal oncology fellowships were retrieved from the council's official website. All fellows enrolled in ACGME-accredited fellowships are mandated to complete case logs before graduation. This study did not include operative procedures performed by fellows in nonACGME-approved fellowship programs. The 2010 to 2016 anatomic site-based procedure log data were used to evaluate fellows' overall and location-specific median operative or patient volume, using descriptive statistics. Linear regression analyses were used to assess changes in the median procedure volume over time. The 2017 categorized procedure log data were used to assess variability in procedure volume between the lowest (10th percentile) and highest (90th percentile) of all fellows. Using 2017 procedure logs, we compared the minimum procedure volume standards, as defined by the MSTS, against the number of procedures performed by fellows across the 10th, 30th, 50th (median), 70th, and 90th percentiles. Results There was no change in the median (range) procedural volume per fellow from 2010 (292 procedures [131 to 634]) to 2017 (312 procedures [174 to 479]; p = 0.58). Based on 2017 categorized procedure log data, there was considerable variability in procedural volume between the lowest (10) percentile and highest (90) percentile of fellows across programs: pediatric oncologic procedures (10-fold difference), surgical management of complications from limb-salvage surgery (sevenfold difference), soft-tissue resections or reconstructions (fourfold difference), bone sarcoma resections or limb-salvage surgery (fourfold difference), and spine, sacrum, and pelvis procedures (threefold difference). A fair proportion of fellows did not meet the minimum procedure volume standards, as recommended by the MSTS across certain categories. For the spine and pelvis (minimum = 10 procedures), fellows in the lowest 10th percentile performed only six procedures. For patients with bone sarcomas or limb salvage (minimum = 20 procedures), fellows in the lowest 10th percentile performed only 14 procedures. For pediatric patients with oncologic conditions (minimum = 15 procedures), fellows in the 50th percentile (13 procedures) and below failed to meet the thresholds. For surgical management of complications from limb-salvage procedures (minimum = five procedures), fellows in the lowest 10th percentile performed only three procedures. Conclusions Although we were encouraged to observe that the median number of procedures performed by musculoskeletal oncology fellows over this time has not changed, we observed wide variability in the procedure volume among fellows for pediatric sarcomas, soft-tissue resection and reconstruction, limb salvage procedures, and spine procedures. We do not know how this compares with fellows trained in nonaccredited fellowship programs. Clinical relevance Although we recognize that the education of fellows entails much more than performing operations, national societies have recognized a need to bring about more uniformity or standardization of training in musculoskeletal oncology. Limiting the number of orthopaedic oncology fellowships to high-volume institutions, expanding the training time period, and/or introducing subspecialty certification may be possible avenues through which standardization of training can be defined.

Aims Currently, the US Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) has been testing bundled payments for revision total joint arthroplasty (TJA) through the Bundled Payment for Care Improvement (BPCI) programme. Under the BPCI, bundled payments for revision TJAs are defined on the basis of diagnosis-related groups (DRGs). However, these DRG-based bundled payment models may not be adequate to account appropriately for the varying case-complexity seen in revision TJAs. Methods The 2008-2014 Medicare 5% Standard Analytical Files (SAF5) were used to identify patients undergoing revision TJA under DRG codes 466, 467, or 468. Generalized linear regression models were built to assess the independent marginal cost-impact of patient, procedural, and geographic characteristics on 90-day costs. Results A total of 9,263 patients (DRG-466 = 838, DRG-467 = 4,573, and DRG-468 = 3,842) undergoing revision TJA from 2008 to 2014 were included in the study. Undergoing revision for a dislocation (+$1,221), periprosthetic fracture (+$4,454), and prosthetic joint infection (+$5,268) were associated with higher 90-day costs. Among comorbidities, malnutrition (+$10,927), chronic liver disease (+$3,894), congestive heart failure (+$3,292), anaemia (+$3,149), and coagulopathy (+$2,997) had the highest marginal cost-increase. The five US states with the highest 90-day costs were Alaska (+$14,751), Maryland (+$13,343), New York (+$7,428), Nevada (+$6,775), and California (+$6,731). Conclusion Under the proposed DRG-based bundled payment methodology, surgeons would be reimbursed the same amount of money for revision TJAs, regardless of the indication (periprosthetic fracture, prosthetic joint infection, mechanical loosening) and/or patient complexity. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(7):959–964.

BACKGROUND The management of primary malignant bone tumors in patients with metastatic disease at presentation remains a challenge. Although surgical resection has been a mainstay in the management of nonmetastatic malignant bone tumors, there is a lack of large-scale evidence-based guidance on whether surgery of the primary site/tumor improves overall survival in malignant bone tumors with metastatic disease at presentation. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES (1) Is surgical resection of the primary tumor associated with improved overall survival in patients with primary malignant bone tumors who have metastatic disease at presentation? (2) What other factors are associated with improved and/or poor overall survival? METHODS The 2004 to 2016 National Cancer Database (NCDB), a national registry containing data from more than 34 million cancer patients in the United States, was queried using International Classification of Diseases, 3rd Edition, topographical codes to identify patients with primary malignant bone tumors of the extremities (C40.0-C40.3, C40.8, and C40.9) and/or pelvis (C41.4). The NCDB was preferred over other national cancer registries (that is, the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database) because it includes a specific variable that codes for patients who received additional surgeries at metastatic sites. Patients with malignant bone tumors of the head or skull, trunk, and spinal column were excluded because these patients are not routinely encountered and treated by orthopaedic oncologists. Histologic codes were used to categorize the tumors into the following groups: osteosarcomas, chondrosarcomas, and Ewing sarcomas. Patients whose tumors were classified as Stage 1, 2, or 3 based on American Joint Commission of Cancer guidelines were excluded. Only patients who presented with metastatic disease were included in the final study sample. The study sample was divided into two distinct groups: those who underwent surgical resection of the primary tumor and those who did not receive any operation for the primary tumor. A total of 2288 patients with primary malignant bone tumors (1121 osteosarcomas, 345 chondrosarcomas, and 822 Ewing sarcomas) with metastatic disease at presentation were included, of whom 46% (1053 of 2288) underwent surgical resection of the primary site. Thirty-three percent (348 of 1053) of patients undergoing surgical resection of the primary site also underwent additional resection of metastases. Patients undergoing surgical resection of the primary site typically were younger than 18 years, lived further from a facility, had tumors involving the upper or lower extremity, had a diagnosis of osteosarcoma or chondrosarcoma, and had a greater tumor size and higher tumor grade at presentation. To account for baseline differences within the patient population and to adjust for additional confounding variables, multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to assess whether undergoing surgical resection of the primary tumor was associated with improved overall survival, after controlling for differences in baseline demographics, tumor characteristics (grade, location, histologic type, and tumor size), and treatment patterns (resection of distant or regional metastatic sites, positive or negative surgical margins, and use of radiation therapy or chemotherapy). Additional sensitivity analyses, stratified by histologic type for osteosarcomas, chondrosarcomas, and Ewing sarcomas, were used to assess factors associated with overall survival for each tumor type. RESULTS After controlling for differences in baseline demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment patterns, we found that surgical resection of the primary site was associated with reduced overall mortality compared with those who did not have a resection of the primary site (hazard ratio 0.42 [95% confidence interval 0.36 to 0.49]; p < 0.001). Among other factors, in the stratified analysis, radiation therapy was associated with improved overall survival for patients with Ewing sarcoma (HR 0.71 [95% CI 0.57 to 0.88]; p = 0.002) but not for those with osteosarcoma (HR 1.14 [95% CI 0.91 to 1.43]; p = 0.643) or chondrosarcoma (HR 1.0 [95 % CI 0.78 to 1.50]; p = 0.643). Chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival for those with osteosarcoma (HR 0.50 [95% CI 0.39 to 0.64]; p < 0.001) and those with chondrosarcoma (HR 0.62 [95% CI 0.45 to 0.85]; p = 0.003) but not those with Ewing sarcoma (HR 0.7 [95% CI 0.46 to 1.35]; p = 0.385). CONCLUSIONS Surgical resection of the primary site was associated with an overall survival advantage in patients with primary malignant bone tumors who presented with metastatic disease. Further research, using more detailed data on metastatic sites (such as, size, location, number, and treatment), chemotherapy regimen and location of radiation (primary or metastatic site) is warranted to better understand which patients will have improved overall survival and/or a benefit in the quality of life from resecting their primary malignant tumor if they present with metastatic disease at diagnosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, therapeutic study.

Despite increasing interest toward managing isolated ankle fractures in an outpatient setting, evidence of its safety remains largely limited. The 2007 to 2014 Humana Administrative Claims database was queried to identify patients undergoing open reduction internal fixation for unimalleolar, bimalleolar, or trimalleolar isolated closed ankle fractures. Two cohorts (outpatient versus inpatient) were then matched on the basis of age, sex, race, region, fracture type (uni-/bi-/trimalleolar) and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index to control for selection bias. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to report independent impact of outpatient-treated ankle fracture surgery on 90-day complications, readmission, and emergency department visit rates. Independent-samples t test was used to compare global 90-day costs between cohorts. A total of 5317 inpatient-treated and 6941 outpatient-treated closed ankle fractures were included in the final cohort. After matching and multivariate analyses, patients with outpatient ankle fractures, compared with patients with inpatient ankle fractures, had statistically lower rates of pneumonia (2.3% versus 4.0%; p.001), myocardial infarction (0.9% versus 1.8%; p = .005), acute renal failure (2.2% versus 5.3%; p.001), urinary tract infections (7.4% versus 12.3%; p.001), and pressure ulcers (0.9% versus 2.0%; p = .001). Outpatient ankle fractures also had lower rates of 90-day readmissions (9.7% versus 14.1%; p.001) and emergency department visits (13.8% versus 16.2%; p = .028). Last, overall 90-day costs for outpatient ankle fractures were nearly $9000 lower than costs for inpatient ankle fractures ($12,923 versus $21,866; p.001). Based on our findings, it appears that outpatient treatment of ankle fractures can be deemed safe and feasible in a select cohort of patients.

BACKGROUND Owing to concerns regarding higher cost, low quality of care and cherry-picking in physician-owned hospitals (POHs), the Affordable Care Act imposed sanctions that prevented the formation of new POHs. With an increasing utilization of total shoulder arthroplasties (TSAs), there is a need for re-evaluation and assessment of quality and cost of TSAs performed at these POHs. METHODS The 2011 to 2014 Medicare 100% Standard Analytical Files was used to identify patients undergoing a reverse TSA or anatomic TSA at POHs and non-POHs. Multivariate regression analyses were used to assess differences in 90-day and 1-year outcomes between the two groups. RESULTS A total of 1,626 (2.2%) patients received a TSA at a POH (N = 50). No notable differences were noted between POH versus non-POHs regarding 90-day surgical site infections (P = 0.645), dislocation (P = 0.068), periprosthetic fractures (P = 0.556), revision arthroplasty (P = 0.114), pulmonary embolism (P = 0.155), deep vein thrombosis (P = 0.208), acute myocardial infarction (P = 0.219), sepsis (P = 0.288), urinary tract infections (P = 0.186), all-cause readmissions (P = 0.427), 1-year dislocations (P = 0.475), 1-year periprosthetic fractures (P = 0.697), and 1-year revision arthroplasties (P = 0.225). TSAs performed at POHs had higher odds of postoperative stiffness at 90-day (odds ratio 1.39; P < 0.001) and 1-year follow-up points (odds ratio 1.51; P < 0.001). TSAs at POHs had markedly lower risk-adjusted 90-day charges (-$8,904) and 90-day costs (-$1,659). CONCLUSION Apart from slightly higher rates of stiffness and renal complications, patients undergoing TSAs at POHs seem to have similar outcomes as compared to non-POHs, while having lower costs of care. The findings suggest a need for further research, evaluating the value of care at POHs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH) of bone, now known as undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma of bone, is a rare neoplasm that accounts for less than 2% of all primary malignant bone tumors. The objective of the current study was to evaluate prognosis and survival for MFH of bone. METHODS The 2004 to 2016 National Cancer Database was queried to identify patients with a primary MFH of bone. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression analyses were used to analyze overall survival and risk factors associated with overall mortality. RESULTS The overall 5-year and 10-year survival rates were 38.3% and 30.5%, respectively. Increasing stage and metastatic disease at presentation were associated with poor overall survival (P

As the current healthcare model transitions from fee-for-service to value-based payments, identifying cost-drivers of 90-day payments following surgical procedures will be a key factor in risk-adjusting prospective bundled payments and ensuring success of these alternative payment models. The 5% Medicare Standard Analytical Files data set for 2005-2014 was used to identify patients undergoing open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for isolated unimalleolar, bimalleolar, and trimalleolar ankle fractures. All acute care and post-acute care payments starting from day 0 of surgery to day 90 postoperatively were used to calculate 90-day costs. Patients with missing data were excluded. Multivariate linear regression modeling was used to derive marginal cost impact of patient-level (age, sex, and comorbidities), procedure-level (fracture type, morphology, location of surgery, concurrent ankle arthroscopy, and syndesmotic fixation), and state-level factors on 90-day costs after surgery. A total of 6499 patients were included in the study. The risk-adjusted 90-day cost for a female patient, aged 65 to 69 years, undergoing outpatient ORIF for a closed unimalleolar ankle fracture in Michigan was $6949 ± $1060. Individuals aged

Background: No study has evaluated the relationship between increasing BMI and severity/type of cervical spine injuries. Aims and Objectives: The objective of our study was to study the impact of body mass index (BMI) on severity of cervical spine fracture. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with traumatic cervical spine fractures at a level I trauma center over a 74-year period. CT scans of the cervical spine were blindly graded according to the AO Spine sub-axial cervical spine classification. The association between BMI and severity of cervical spine fracture was studied by multiple-variable logistic regression. Results: A total of 291 patients with an average BMI of 26.1 ± 5.4 kg/m2 were studied. Higher BMI was not associated with more severe injury (OR 1.03, 95%, CI: 0.97–1.08). For rollover motor vehicle accident (MVA), the association was trending towards significance (OR 2.55, 95%, CI: 0.98-6.66, P = 0.06). Conclusions: Patients with higher BMI may be predisposed to more severe cervical spine fracture in rollover MVA, but not non-rollover MVA or falls.

Obesity has been shown to be associated with higher rates of complications after lumbar spine surgery. However, the evidence regarding the impact of body mass index (BMI) on outcomes following posterior cervical fusions (PCFs) remains limited.The 2012-2017 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried using Current Procedural Terminology code 22600 to identify PCFs. Patients undergoing anterior cervical spine surgery and surgery for deformity, malignancy, or infection were excluded. Patients with missing data with regard to weight, height, and 30-day outcomes were excluded. BMI (kg/mOf 2786 patients with PCFs, 710 (25.5%) had BMI25.0, 919 (33.0%) had BMI between 25.0 and 29.9, 655 (23.5%) had BMI between 30.0 and 34.9, and 502 (18.0%) had BMI ≥35.0. Following adjustment for baseline demographics and clinical characteristics, increased BMI was not associated with a higher risk of any adverse events, severe adverse events, minor adverse events, bleeding requiring transfusion, or readmissions within 30 days of surgery. BMI ≥35.0 versus BMI25.0 was associated only with a higher risk of deep surgical site infections (odds ratio 4.61; P = 0.009).With the exception of a higher rate of deep surgical site infections seen in obese patients, increased BMI does not seem to have a major impact on 30-day outcomes following PCFs.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Current bundled payment programs in spine surgery, such as the Bundled Payment for Care Improvement (BPCI), rely on the use of Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) to define payments. However, these DRGs may not be adequate enough to appropriately capture the large amount of variation seen in spine procedures. For example, DRG 459 (spinal fusion except cervical with major co-morbidity or complication) and DRG 460 (spinal fusion except cervical without major co-morbidity or complication) do not differentiate between the type of fusion (anterior or posterior), the levels/extent of fusion, the use of interbody/graft/BMP, indication of surgery (primary vs revision) or even if the surgery was performed for a vertebral fracture. PURPOSE We carried out a comprehensive analysis to report the factors responsible for cost variation in a bundled payment model for spinal fusions. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review of a 5% national sample of Medicare claims from 2008-2014 (SAF5). OUTCOME MEASURES To understand the independent marginal cost impact of various patient-level, geographic-level and procedure-level characteristics on 90-day costs for patients undergoing spinal fusions under DRG 459 and 460. METHODS The 2008-2014 Medicare 5% Standard Analytical Files (SAF) were used to retrieve patients undergoing spinal fusions under DRG 459 and DRG 460 only. Patients with missing gender, age and/or state-level data were excluded. Only those patients who had complete data, with regard to payments/costs/reimbursements, starting from Day 0 of surgery up to 90 days postoperatively were included to prevent erroneous collection. Multivariate linear regression models were built to assess the independent marginal cost impact (decrease/increase) of each patient-level, state-level and procedure-level characteristic on the average 90-day cost while controlling for other covariates. RESULTS A total of 21,367 patients (DRG-460=20,154; DRG-459=1,213) were included in the study. The average 90-day cost for all lumbar fusions was $31,716 ± $18,124, with the individual 90-day payments being $54,607 ± $30,643 (DRG-459) and $30,338 ± $16,074 (DRG-460). Increasing age was associated with significant marginal increases in 90-day payments (70-74y: + $2,387, 75-79y: + $3,389, 80-84y: + $2,872, ≥85: + $1,627). With regard to procedure-level factors – undergoing an anterior fusion (+ $3,118), >3 level fusion (+ $5,648) vs 1-3 level fusion, use of interbody device (+ $581), intra-operative neuro-monitoring (+ $1,413), concurrent decompression (+ $768) and undergoing surgery for thoracolumbar fracture (+ $6,169) were associated with higher 90-day costs. Most individual comorbidities were associated with higher 90-day costs, with malnutrition (+ $12,264), CVA/stroke (+ $5,886), Alzheimer's (+ $4,968), Parkinson's disease (+ $4,415) and coagulopathy (+ $3,810) having the highest marginal 90-day cost-increases. The top 5 states with the highest marginal cost-increase, in comparison to Michigan, were Maryland (+ $12,657), Alaska (+ $11,292), California (+ $10,040), Massachusetts (+ $8,800) and the District of Columbia (+ $8,315). CONCLUSIONS Under the proposed DRG-based bundled payment model, providers would be reimbursed the same amount for lumbar fusions regardless of the surgical approach (posterior vs anterior), the extent of fusion (1-3 level vs >3 level), use of adjunct procedures (decompressions) and cause/indication of surgery (fracture vs degenerative pathology), despite each of these factors having different resource utilization and associated costs. When defining and developing future bundled payments for spinal fusions, health policy makers should strive to account for the individual patient-level, state-level and procedure-level variation seen within DRGs to prevent the creation of a financial disincentive in taking care of sicker patients and/or performing more extensive complex spinal fusions. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

Study design This was a retrospective cohort study. Objective To analyze risk factors associated with 30-day adverse outcomes and readmissions after revision anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Summary of background data No current literature has evaluated the risk factors associated with adverse outcomes after revision ACDF. Methods The 2012-2016 American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried using Current Procedural Terminology codes for ACDF (22551, 22554, and 63075) combined with Current Procedural Terminology codes 22830 (exploration of spinal fusion) or 22855 (removal of anterior instrumentation) to identify revision cases. Patients undergoing concurrent posterior cervical spine surgery and/or corpectomies were excluded from the analysis. A total of 1140 patients were retrieved for analysis. Results Out of a total of 1140 patients, 51 (4.5%) experienced at least 1 any adverse event, with 40 (3.5%) experiencing a severe adverse event, and 17 (1.5%) experiencing a minor adverse event. A 30-day readmission rate was 3.4% (N=39) after a revision ACDF. On multivariate analysis, any adverse events were significantly associated with male sex [odds ratio (OR), 1.98], 2-level versus 1-level fusion (OR, 2.05), and a length of stay (LOS)>1 day (OR, 7.70). Severe adverse events were independently associated with male sex (OR, 2.85), smoking (OR, 0.33), 2-level versus 1-level fusion (OR, 2.03), and LOS>1 day (OR, 7.28). LOS>1 day was the only significant factor associated with an minor adverse event (OR, 14.65) and readmission within 30 days (OR, 2.67). Conclusions Using a national surgical database, the study is the first of its kind to report rates and risk factors associated with adverse outcomes after ACDFs. Providers should understand the need of preoperative risk stratification in these patients to reduce the risk of experiencing adverse outcomes. Level of evidence Level III-retrospective.

STUDY DESIGN Retrospective. OBJECTIVE Assess the impact of varying severity of BMI on 30-day outcomes following posterior spinal fusions in neuromuscular scoliosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Obesity in the pediatric population is shown to be associated with adverse outcomes across varying specialties. The weight-outcome relationship in neuromuscular scoliosis has not been thoroughly investigated. METHODS The 2012-2016 American College of Surgeons - National Surgical Quality Improvement (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried using Current Procedural Terminology codes 22800, 22802, and 22804 to identify patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion for neuromuscular scoliosis only. BMI was classified into four groups based on the Center for Disease Control (CDC) BMI-for-age percentile chart - Normal weight (BMI ≥5th to

Objective To understand cost distribution in a 90-day episode of care following posterior spinal fusions (PSFs) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Methods The 2007–2016 Humana PearlDiver dataset was queried using Current Procedural Terminology codes (22800, 22802, 22804, 22842, 22843, and 22844) to identify patients with AIS, aged 10–19 years, receiving PSFs. The following categories were used to define distribution in 90-day costs: 1) facility costs, 2) surgeon costs, 3) anesthesia costs, 4) intraoperative neuromonitoring, 5) hospital services and investigations, 6) intensive care unit stay, 7) radiology, 8) physical therapy/rehabilitation, 9) office visits, and 10) readmissions. Results A total of 455 patients with AIS received PSFs, of whom 381 (83.7%) were commercial insurance beneficiaries and 74 (16.3%) were Medicaid beneficiaries. The overall average 90-day cost of surgery was $124,360 with the 90-day stipulated bundled prices being $136,302 and $62,871 for commercial and Medicaid beneficiaries, respectively. Facility costs comprised 85%−92% of the 90-day cost, followed by surgeon costs (5.2%−5.7%). Post-acute care (physical therapy/rehab and office visits) was not a major driver of the 90-day cost (0.2%−0.3%). Significant independent predictors of increased 90-day costs were—increased co-morbidity burden (+$11,284), ≥7 levels fusion (+$65,330), and length of stay (+$5298/day). Medicaid (−$81,957) payer type was associated with lower 90-day costs. Conclusions Facility costs are a major determinant of overall 90-day costs following PSFs in AIS. Providers should aim at optimizing the co-morbidity burden and constructing accelerated care-pathways to decrease the length of stay and reduce the cost of the entire episode of care.

The current Bundled Payment for Care Improvement model relies on the use of "Diagnosis Related Groups" (DRGs) to risk-adjust reimbursements associated with a 90-day episode of care. Three distinct DRG groups exist for defining payments associated with cervical fusions: (1) DRG-471 (cervical fusions with major comorbidity/complications), (2) DRG-472 (with comorbidity/complications), and (3) DRG-473 (without major comorbidity/complications). However, this DRG system may not be entirely suitable in controlling the large amounts of cost variation seen among cervical fusions. For instance, these DRGs do not account for area/location of surgery (upper cervical vs. lower cervical), type of surgery (primary vs. revision), surgical approach (anterior vs. posterior), extent of fusion (1-3 level vs.3 level), and cause/indication of surgery (fracture vs. degenerative pathology).To understand factors responsible for cost variation in a 90-day episode of care following cervical fusions.Retrospective study of a 5% national sample of Medicare claims from 2008 to 2014 5% Standard Analytical Files (SAF5).To calculate the independent marginal cost impact of various patient-level, geographic-level, and procedure-level characteristics on 90-day reimbursements for patients undergoing cervical fusions under DRG-471, DRG-472, and DRG-473.The 2008 to 2014 Medicare SAF5 was queried using DRG codes 471, 472, and 473 to identify patients receiving a cervical fusion. Patients undergoing noncervical fusions (thoracolumbar), surgery for deformity/malignancy, and/or combined anterior-posterior fusions were excluded. Patients with missing data and/or those who died within 90 days of the postoperative follow-up period were excluded. Multivariate linear regression modeling was performed to assess the independent marginal cost impact of DRG, gender, age, state, procedure-level factors (including cause/indication of surgery), and comorbidities on total 90-day reimbursement.Following application of inclusion/exclusion criteria, a total of 12,419 cervical fusions were included. The average 90-day reimbursement for each DRG group was as follows: (1) DRG-471=$54,314±$32,643, (2) DRG-472=$28,535±$17,271, and (3) DRG-473=$18,492±$10,706. The risk-adjusted 90-day reimbursement of a nongeriatric (age65) female, with no major comorbidities, undergoing a primary 1- to 3-level anterior cervical fusion for degenerative cervical spine disease was $14,924±$753. Male gender (+$922) and age 70 to 84 (+$1,007 to +$2,431) was associated with significant marginal increases in 90-day reimbursements. Undergoing upper cervical surgery (-$1,678) had a negative marginal cost impact. Among other procedure-level factors, posterior approach (+$3,164),3 level fusion (+$2,561), interbody (+$667), use of intra-operative neuromonitoring (+$1,018), concurrent decompression/laminectomy (+$1,657), and undergoing fusion for cervical fracture (+$3,530) were associated higher 90-day reimbursements. Severe individual comorbidities were associated with higher 90-day reimbursements, with malnutrition (+$15,536), CVA/stroke (+$6,982), drug abuse/dependence (+$5,059), hypercoagulopathy (+$5,436), and chronic kidney disease (+$4,925) having the highest marginal cost impacts. Significant state-level variation was noted, with Maryland (+$8,790), Alaska (+$6,410), Massachusetts (+$6,389), California (+$5,603), and New Mexico (+$5,530) having the highest reimbursements and Puerto Rico (-$7,492) and Iowa (-$3,393) having the lowest reimbursements, as compared with Michigan.The current cervical fusion bundled payment model fails to employ a robust risk adjustment of prices resulting in the large amount of cost variation seen within 90-day reimbursements. Under the proposed DRG-based risk adjustment model, providers would be reimbursed the same amount for cervical fusions regardless of the surgical approach (posterior vs. anterior), the extent of fusion, use of adjunct procedures (decompressions), and cause/indication of surgery (fracture vs. degenerative pathology), despite each of these factors having different resource utilization and associated reimbursements. Our findings suggest that defining payments based on DRG codes only is an imperfect way of employing bundled payments for spinal fusions and will only end up creating major financial disincentives and barriers to access of care in the healthcare system.

BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of patients undergoing hip fracture surgery are transferred from other locations. With no current orthopedic literature present, we sought to study the impact of transfer location on 30-day outcomes following geriatric hip fracture surgery. MATERIALS & METHODS: The 2015–2016 ACS-NSQIP database was queried using CPT codes to retrieve records of geriatric patients undergoing hip fracture surgery (total hip arthroplasty/THA, hemiarthroplasty/HA and open reduction internal fixation/ORIF). Transfer status was defined into four groups – 1) No transfer (admitted from home), 2) From acute care hospital, 3) From nursing home/chronic care facility and 4) From outside emergency department (ED). Patients with missing data were excluded. A total of 31,218 patients were included in the final cohort. RESULTS: Out of 31,218 patients - 23,659 (75.8%) were admitted from home, 1574 (5.0%) from acute care hospitals, 3299 (10.6%) from nursing home/chronic care facilities and 2686 (8.6%) from outside EDs. Following adjusted analysis, transfer from nursing home vs. home was associated with higher odds of 30-day mortality (OR 1.57 [95% 1.36–1.80]; p

Caused by perceptions regarding unnecessary healthcare resource utilization, high costs of care, and financial incentives towards "cherry-picking" cases in physician owned hospitals, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) of 2010 imposed restrictions on existing physician-owned hospitals from expanding. Despite an increasing number of individuals requiring access to spine surgical care, no study has evaluated the surgical safety and costs of elective posterior lumbar fusions (PLFs) being performed in physician-owned vs. non-physician-owned hospitals.We assessed differences in 90-day costs and outcomes between patients undergoing elective 1- to 3-level PLFs at physician-owned hospitals vs. nonphysician-owned hospitals.Retrospective cohort study of 2007 to 2014 100% Medicare claims database.The 2007 to 2014 Medicare 100% Standard Analytical Files (SAF100) was queried using International Classification of Diseases 9th Edition (ICD-9) procedure code for patients undergoing elective 1- to 3-level PLFs (81.07, 81.08, and 81.62). The Medicare Hospital Compare database was used to identify provider codes for physician-owned hospitals. These provider codes were cross-referenced to identify records of patients receiving elective PLFs at these hospitals from the SAF100 database.Ninety day complications, readmissions, emergency department (ED) visits, charges, and costs.Multivariate logistic and linear regression analyses were used to assess significant differences in 90-day complications, readmissions, charges and costs between the two groups.A total of 6,679 (2.9%) patients received an elective PLF at a physician-owned hospital (N=39; 2.2%) whereas 225,090 (97.1%) received surgery at nonphysician-owned hospital (N=1,774; 97.8%). After controlling for age, gender, region, hospital factors (socio-economic status area, urban vs. rural location and volume) and Elixhauser co-morbidity index, undergoing surgery at physician-owned hospital was associated with lower odds of thromboembolic complications (OR 0.66 [95% CI 0.53-0.82]; p.001), urinary tract infections (OR 0.87 [95% CI 0.79-0.95]; p=.002) and renal complications (OR 0.52 [95% CI 0.43-0.63]; p.001) within 90-days following the surgery. Patients undergoing PLFs at physician-owned hospitals vs. nonphysician-owned hospitals also had lower risk-adjusted inpatient charges (-$10,218), inpatient costs (-$2,302), 90-day charges (-$9,780) and 90-day costs (-$2,324). No significant differences were noted between physician-owned and nonphysician-owned hospitals with regards to 90-day wound complications (OR 1.08 [95% CI 0.94-1.22]; p=.279), pulmonary complications (OR 1.06 [95% CI 0.97-1.17]; p=.187), cardiac complications (OR 0.92 [95% CI 0.83-1.01]; p=.089), septic complications (OR 0.77 [95% CI 0.56-1.01]; p=.073), all-cause ED visits (OR 0.96 [95% CI 0.89-1.04]; p=.311), revision surgery (OR 1.09 [95% CI 0.72-1.59]; p=.653) and readmissions (OR 0.98 [95% CI 0.89-1.08]; p=.680).Our results suggest that patients undergoing elective 1- to 3-level PLFs at physician-owned hospitals do not experience a greater number of complications and/or readmissions while having lower risk-adjusted charges and costs over the 90-day episode of care. The findings call on the need for revaluation/reconsideration of the ACAs restriction on the expansion of these physician-owned hospitals.

To analyze the stability of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and compare various methods of supplemental fixation in adjacent-segment disease.Four fresh-frozen human cadaveric lumbar spines (L1 to sacrum) were used for motion analysis in extension, flexion, and lateral bending. The L4-L5 level was secured with a lateral interbody cage and pedicle screws to simulate a fused segment. The adjacent segment (L3-L4) was evaluated with flexibility testing sequentially under the following conditions: native disc (control), LLIF cage, cage with lateral plate, pedicle screws with z-rod, and single-rod construct. The difference in mean displacement (millimeters) between groups was studied by the analysis of variance and post-hoc Tukey test.Mean displacement (millimeters) on averaging motion in all planes was 0.741 for native disc, 0.273 for cage, 0.183 for cage with plate, 0.086 for pedicle screws and z-rod, and 0.106 for the single-rod construct. All 4 constructs led to a significant reduction (P0.001) in displacement in extension and flexion, as compared with native disc. There was no demonstrable superiority between the 4 constructs as the mean displacements were not significantly different from each other.LLIF with and without supplemental fixation reduced motion significantly at the adjacent segment as compared with intact disc. There was a trend toward increasing rigidity with supplemental fixation (plate and pedicle screw constructs). Further biomechanical studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these initial findings.