Search

Determining the fundamental frequency of Offshore Wind Turbines (OWTs) is crucial to ensure the reliability and longevity of the structure. This study presents a global sensitivity analysis of the fundamental frequency of OWTs on jacket foundations. Monte Carlo sampling was employed to generate a diverse set of wind turbines, emplacements, and jacket designs, ensuring that the generated samples are realistic and yield relevant conclusions. The fundamental frequency and its partial derivatives were obtained via a previously developed ANN model. The relative sensitivities were computed to facilitate the comparison of their influence. The results demonstrate that wind turbine properties are the most relevant variables affecting the fundamental frequency, with a decrement in frequency caused by tower height and rotor-nacelle assembly mass, as well as an increment due to the section dimensions of the tower, particularly at its base. Soil properties have a significant effect on foundation stiffness for soft and light soils but can be neglected for hard and heavy soils. The diameter and thickness of the braces also show different relevance depending on their dimensions, producing rigid links between legs for greater sections. This study provides a measure of the variables influencing the fundamental frequency, facilitating a deeper comprehension of this phenomenon. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: This paper presents a wide parametric study aimed at elucidating the influence, on the computed seismic response of bridge piers, of two related aspects of the model: (1) the adoption of the classical hysteretic or the causal Biot's damping models for the soil and (2) the use of two different lumped parameter models of different complexity and accuracy to approximate the impedances of the pile foundation. A total of 2072 cases, including different superstructures, pile foundations, soil deposits, and seismic input signals, are studied. The results are presented so that the influence of the different parameters involved in the analysis can be assessed. From an engineering point of view, both lumped parameter models provide, in general, sufficiently low errors. The choice of the most adequate model for each case will depend not only on the configuration of the structure and the soil‐foundation system but also on the assumed soil damping model, whose influence on the computed seismic responses is relevant in many cases. The nonphysical behaviour provided by the classical hysteretic damping model for the soil at zero frequency generates issues in the process of fitting the impedance functions. It is also found that larger deck displacements are predicted by Biot's model due to the higher damping at low frequencies provided by the classical hysteretic damping model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]