Search

Patients with degenerative hip and lumbar spine disorders requiring surgery in both locations is fairly common in clinical practice. We investigated if the order of total hip replacement (THR) and lumbar spinal stenosis surgery (LSSS) influences patient‐reported outcomes (PROs). We used data from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register (SHAR) and the Swedish Spine Register (Swespine), on patients operated with THR and LSSS in years 2002 to 2012. To increase the probability of having symptomatic disorders in both locations at the time of the first surgery, we only included patients with both LSSS and THR performed within 2 years. Linear and logistic regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, preoperative PROs, and time between surgeries were used to investigate the association between order of surgeries and the generic PRO measurements EQ‐5D and EQ VAS. Eighty‐four patients had THR prior to LSSS and 171 patients LSSS prior to THR. Linear regression showed that LSSS prior to THR was associated with higher EQ‐5D index (B = 0.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.03‐0.16) and EQ VAS (B = 5.6, 95% CI 0.4‐10.9) 1 year after the last surgery. Logistic regression showed that the odds ratio [OR] for not having any problems in the "pain" (OR = 3.0, 95% CI 1.5‐6.3) and "anxiety/depression" (OR = 2.3, 95% CI 1.3‐4.1) dimensions were higher for LSSS before THR. In our cohort, LSSS before THR was associated with better health‐related quality of life outcomes compared to the reverse order. The results from our cohort can be helpful in a clinical situation where the physician gives advice to an individual patient when choosing the order of procedures. However, further studies are necessary in order to confirm these results in other cohorts. At present, standard of care remains that order of surgery should be individualized for each patient, with guidance from the operating surgeons. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and purpose — Feedback programs relating to surgeon levels have been introduced in some orthopedic quality registers around the globe. The aim of an established surgeon feedback program is to help surgeons understand their practice and enable an analysis of their own results. There is no surgeon feedback program in Sweden in the orthopedic quality registers and there is a fear that a feedback system might pinpoint surgeons as poor performers, partly due to patient case mix. As a step prior to the introduction of a future possible feedback program in Sweden, we assessed the variation in the occurrence of adverse events (AE) within 90 days and reoperations within 2 years between surgeons in western Sweden and explored the number of surgeons outside the control-limit following primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs). Patients and methods — Patient data, surgical data, and information on the surgeons, relating to surgeries performed in 2011–2016, were retrieved from 9 publicly funded hospitals in western Sweden. Data from medical hospital records, the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register (SHAR) and a regional patient register located in western Sweden were linked to a database. Funnel plots with control-limits based on upper 95% and 99.8% confidence intervals (CI) were used to illustrate the variation between surgeons in terms of the outcome and to explore the number of surgeons outside the control-limit. Both observed and standardized proportions are explored. The definition of surgeons outside the control-limit in the study is a surgeon above the upper 95% CI. Results — The study comprised 9,482 primary THAs due to osteoarthritis performed by 208 surgeons, where 91% of the included primary THAs were performed by orthopedic specialists and 9% by trainees. The mean overall annual volume for all surgeons was 27. The observed overall mean rate for AEs within 90 days for all surgeons was 6.2% (5.8–6.7) and for reoperations within 2 years 1.8% (1.7–2.2). The proportion of surgeons outside the 95% CI was low for both AEs (0–5%) and reoperations within 2 years (0–1%) in 2011–2016. The corresponding numbers were even lower for AEs (0–3%) but similar for reoperations (0–1%) after standardization for differences in case mix. In a sub-analysis when the number of surgeries performed was restricted to more than 10 primary THAs annually to being evaluated, almost half or more of all the surgeons were excluded from the annual analysis. The result of this restriction was that all surgeons outside the control-limit disappeared after standardization for both AEs and reoperations for all the years investigated. Considering the complete period of 6 years, less than 1% (1 high-volume surgeon for AEs and 2 high-volume surgeons for reoperations) after risk adjustments were outside the 95% CI, and no surgeons were outside the 99.8% CI. Interpretation — In a Swedish setting, the variation in surgeon performance, as measured by AEs within 90 days and reoperations within 2 years following primary THA, was small and 3% or less of the surgeons were outside the 95% CI for the investigated years after adjustments for case mix. The risk for an individual surgeon to be regarded as having poor performance when creating surgeon-specific feedback in the SHAR is very low when volume and patient risk factors are considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and purpose — Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is increasing as treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures. Several studies compare hemiarthroplasty (HA) with THA, but results vary and few studies report on medical complications. We examined the outcome of THA and HA with a focus on medical complications, hip complications, and death. Patients and methods — Data from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register on 30,953 acute hip fracture patients treated with cemented THA or HA in 2005–2011 were cross-matched with Statistics Sweden for socioeconomic data and with the National Patient Register for diagnostic codes representing medical complications within 180 days or hip complications within the study period. Propensity score matching was used to create comparable groups based on age, sex, income, level of education, marital status, Elixhauser index, and year of surgery. Logistic regression models were created for each outcome. Results — 81% were treated with HA, 73% and 71% were female (HA and THA respectively). Matching resulted in 2 groups of 5,815 patients each. THA was associated with fewer medical complications (OR = 0.83; 95% CI 0.76–0.91) and lower 1-year mortality (OR = 0.42; CI 0.38–0.48), but more hip complications (OR = 1.31; CI 1.20–1.43). Interpretation — THA as treatment of hip fracture was associated with more hip-related complications than HA. The results on mortality and medical complications are, rather, influenced by residual confounding than by the implant design per se. An expansive use of THAs for hip fracture treatment, at the expense of HAs, is not recommended based on our findings if hip complications are to be avoided. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: We assessed the impact of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) compared with blood glucose monitoring (BGM) on rates of hospitalization for metabolic and vascular complications of diabetes and on HbA1c levels for adults with type 1 diabetes., Research Design and Methods: This retrospective study using data from the Swedish National Diabetes Register and the Swedish National Patient Register comprised adults with type 1 diabetes and an isCGM initiation date after 1 June 2017 and matched control individuals using BGM. Hospital admission rates were calculated per 100 person-years of follow-up., Results: We identified 11,822 adults with type 1 diabetes and an isCGM index date after 1 June 2017 and HbA1c baseline values 3-8 months prior to the index date. Compared with 3,007 BGM users, isCGM users had a significantly lower relative risk of hospitalization for hypoglycemia (0.32; 95% CI 0.14, 0.74), diabetic ketoacidosis (0.55; 0.35, 0.87), stroke (0.48; 0.37, 0.64), acute myocardial infarction (0.64; 0.46, 0.91), atrial fibrillation (0.59; 0.38, 0.94), heart failure (0.25; 0.16, 0.39), peripheral vascular disease (0.21; 0.07, 0.62), kidney disease (0.48; 0.35, 0.66), or hospitalization for any reason (0.32; 0.29, 0.35). Compared with BGM users, change in mean HbA1c for isCGM users was -0.30% (-3.3 mmol/mol) at 6 months and -0.24% (-2.6 mmol/mol) at 24 months (both P < 0.001)., Conclusions: This study shows that adults with type 1 diabetes in Sweden who initiate isCGM have significantly reduced hospitalization rates for acute diabetes events, kidney disease, and cardiovascular complications, along with improved glucose control, compared with BGM users., (© 2024 by the American Diabetes Association.)