Search

In Germany, deaths of SARS-CoV-2-positive persons are reported as 'death related to SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19' to the Robert Koch Institute, Germany's main infectious disease institution. In 177 COVID-19-associated deaths reported in Regensburg, Germany, from October 2020 to January 2021, we investigated how deaths following SARS-CoV-2 infection were reported and whether cases with a death attributed to SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19 death [CD]) differed from cases with a reported death from other causes (non-COVID-19 death [NCD]).This was an observational retrospective cohort study.We analysed descriptive data on the numbers of cases, deaths, age, sex, symptoms and hospitalizations. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) and performed Chi-squared/Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for comparison of medians.Deaths attributed to COVID-19 occurred primarily in elderly patients. The mortality rate and the case fatality ratio (CFR) increased with age. The median age and the prevalence of risk factors were similar between CD and NCD. Respiratory symptoms and pneumonia at the time of diagnosis were associated with death reported as CD. The odds of CD attribution in cases hospitalized because of COVID-19 were 6-fold higher than the odds of NCD (OR: 6.00; 95% CI: 1.32 to 27.22).Respiratory symptoms/pneumonia at the time of diagnosis and hospitalization due to COVID-19 were associated with attributing a death to COVID-19. Numbers of COVID deaths need to be interpreted with caution. Criteria that facilitate attributing the cause of death among SARS-CoV-2 cases more uniformly could make these figures more comparable.

Seit Dezember 2019 verbreitet sich das neuartige Coronavirus SARS-CoV‑2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome – Corona Virus-2) rasch im Sinne einer weltweiten Pandemie. Dies stellt Kliniker und Krankenhäuser vor große Herausforderungen und belastet die Gesundheitssysteme vieler Länder in einem nie dagewesenen Ausmaß. Die Mehrheit der Patienten zeigt lediglich milde Symptome der sogenannten Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Dennoch benötigen etwa 5–8 % eine intensivmedizinische Behandlung. Die akute hypoxämische respiratorische Insuffizienz mit Dyspnoe und hoher Atemfrequenz (>30/Min) führt in der Regel zur Aufnahme auf die Intensivstation. Oft finden sich dann bereits bilaterale pulmonale Infiltrate/Konsolidierungen oder auch Lungenembolien in der Bildgebung. Im weiteren Verlauf entwickeln viele Patienten ein Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). Eine klinische Wirksamkeit einer medikamentösen Therapie bei schwerer COVID-Erkrankung (hospitalisierte Patienten) ist bisher für Remdesivir und Dexamethason nachgewiesen. Das Hauptziel der supportiven Therapie ist es eine ausreichende Oxygenierung sicherzustellen. Die invasive Beatmung und wiederholte Bauchlagerung sind dabei wichtige Elemente in der Behandlung von schwer hypoxämischen COVID-19 Patienten. Die strikte Einhaltung der Basishygiene, einschließlich der Händehygiene, sowie das korrekte Tragen von adäquater persönlicher Schutzausrüstung sind im Umgang mit den Patienten unabdingbar. Prozeduren, die zur Aerosolbildung führen könnten, sollten falls nötig, mit äußerster Sorgfalt und Vorbereitung durchgeführt werden.

Seit Dezember 2019 verbreitet sich das neuartige Coronavirus SARS-CoV‑2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome – Corona Virus-2) rasch im Sinne einer weltweiten Pandemie. Dies stellt Kliniker und Krankenhäuser vor große Herausforderungen und belastet die Gesundheitssysteme vieler Länder in einem nie dagewesenen Ausmaß. Die Mehrheit der Patienten zeigt lediglich milde Symptome der sogenannten Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Dennoch benötigen etwa 5–8 % eine intensivmedizinische Behandlung. Die akute hypoxämische respiratorische Insuffizienz mit Dyspnoe und hoher Atemfrequenz (>30/Min) führt in der Regel zur Aufnahme auf die Intensivstation. Oft finden sich dann bereits bilaterale pulmonale Infiltrate/Konsolidierungen oder auch Lungenembolien in der Bildgebung. Im weiteren Verlauf entwickeln viele Patienten ein Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). Eine klinische Wirksamkeit einer medikamentösen Therapie bei schwerer COVID-Erkrankung (hospitalisierte Patienten) ist bisher für Remdesivir und Dexamethason nachgewiesen. Das Hauptziel der supportiven Therapie ist es eine ausreichende Oxygenierung sicherzustellen. Die invasive Beatmung und wiederholte Bauchlagerung sind dabei wichtige Elemente in der Behandlung von schwer hypoxämischen COVID-19 Patienten. Die strikte Einhaltung der Basishygiene, einschließlich der Händehygiene, sowie das korrekte Tragen von adäquater persönlicher Schutzausrüstung sind im Umgang mit den Patienten unabdingbar. Prozeduren, die zur Aerosolbildung führen könnten, sollten falls nötig, mit äußerster Sorgfalt und Vorbereitung durchgeführt werden.

Das „severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2“ (SARS-CoV-2) ist ein neues β‑Coronavirus, das Ende 2019 in Wuhan, China, erstmals entdeckt wurde und sich in den folgenden Monaten weltweit verbreitete. Wir stellen hier die bisher bekannten Parameter und Daten zur Epidemiologie des Virus dar. SARS-CoV‑2 repliziert vor allem im oberen und unteren Respirationstrakt und wird überwiegend von asymptomatisch wie symptomatisch Infizierten durch Tröpfchen übertragen. Die Basisreproduktionszahl wird derzeit auf einen Wert zwischen 2 und 3 geschätzt, die Inkubationszeit beträgt im Median 6 (2–14) Tage. Die überwiegende Zahl der Infektionen verläuft unkompliziert, bei 5–10 % der Infizierten tritt eine Pneumonie auf, die zur Hospitalisierung und auch zum Organversagen führen kann. Wichtigste Risikofaktoren für einen komplizierten Verlauf sind höheres Alter, Hypertonie und chronische Herz- und Lungenerkrankungen sowie Immundefekte. Nosokomiale Übertragungen und Infektionen bei medizinischem Personal werden beobachtet. Die „case fatality rate“ über alle Altersgruppen beträgt etwa 1,4 %, sie steigt ab der sechsten Lebensdekade an. Mit der Reduktion von sozialen Kontakten sind bisher in vielen Regionen Ausbrüche begrenzt worden. Welche Maßnahmen im Einzelnen wirksam sind, ist noch offen.

Against the background of increasing antimicrobial resistance, antibiotic stewardship (ABS) is an important measure to counteract the spread of resistant pathogens and multidrug resistance. For Germany and Austria, a comprehensive S3 guideline is available, which was last updated in 2018. The control of antibiotic or anti-infective use in hospitals should be guided by specialized ABS teams. At the hospital level, ABS also includes a structured ongoing analysis of local antibiotic use and resistance data. Recommendations for locally adapted therapy regimens should be derived and implemented from this data analysis. ABS consists of regular ward rounds ("ABS visits"), during which members of the ABS team review the indication, dosage, route of administration and duration of antimicrobial therapy at the bedside. Here, the key challenge is to save antibiotics without compromising the individual patient. Digitalization and artificial intelligence offer new options for ABS, while the adaption of inpatient concepts to outpatient care is also important.

Antibiotic stewardship (ABS) is an important measure to counteract the spread of resistant pathogens and multidrug resistance. The most important ABS tools include the implementation of local guidelines, the development of a house-related list of anti-infective agents, regular ABS visits and practice-oriented internal training events. Effective strategies for therapy optimization include indication testing and therapy evaluation, dose optimization as well as determining an appropriate duration of therapy. Oralization of anti-infectives (sequence therapy) should be supported by consistent clinical criteria in in-house guidelines. The incidence of Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI) can be more than halved by restricting the so-called "4C antibiotics". Point-of-care tests help to minimize the use of antibiotics in the outpatient setting. Vaccination reduces the need for antibiotic therapy.

Involvement of infectious disease (ID) specialists in the care of hospitalized patients with infections through consultation services improves the quality of care and the outcome of patients. This survey aimed to describe activities and utilization of ID consultations at four German tertiary care hospitals. A 1-month (March 2016) retrospective cross-sectional study at four university hospitals (Freiburg, Jena, Cologne and Regensburg) was performed. Only ID consultations with written documentation and bedside patient evaluation were included. Consultations were analyzed with regard to requesting departments, infections, case severity, and diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations. In the study period, 638 ID consultations were performed in 479 patients—corresponding to 3–4 consultations per 100 inpatient cases. Patients were characterized by a high disease complexity—the mean case mix index in patients with consultation was 10.1 compared to 1.6 for all patients. ID consultations were requested by many different specialties, with approximately half of the requests coming from surgical disciplines. ID consultations resulted in revised diagnoses in 34% of the cases, provided recommendations for additional diagnostic procedures in 66%, and for modifications of antimicrobial regimens in 70% of the cases. Infectious disease consultations were requested for patients with severe and complicated diseases and resulted in recommendations that highly impacted the diagnostic work-up and therapeutic management of patients. The results of this survey may help to estimate requirements for establishment of such services in Germany.

Impfungen, die speziell fur Patienten mit Diabetes mellitus indiziert bzw. sinnvoll sind, sind v. a. diejenigen gegen Pneumokokken, Influenzaviren, Zoster sowie Hepatitis-B-Viren. Bei all diesen Indikationen ist entweder das Risiko fur Infektionen oder das fur Komplikationen eindeutig hoher als bei Personen ohne Diabetes mellitus. Insbesondere auf die Kombination von Pneumokokken- und Influenzaimpfung sollte vom behandelnden Hausarzt oder aber Diabetologen geachtet werden, beide Infektionen konnen synergistisch sein und das ohnehin hohere Risiko fur Pneumonien – und die damit assoziierten kardiovaskularen Komplikationen – bei Diabetespatienten dramatisch beeinflussen. Patienten mit Komplikationen des Diabetes mellitus, insbesondere mit einer Niereninsuffizienz, haben ein noch groseres Komplikationsrisiko und sprechen auf manche Impfungen schlechter an. Auf spezifische Impfschemata, z. B. bei der Hepatitis-B-Impfung, und Indikationen bei Reiseimpfungen wird deshalb hingewiesen. Alle oben angefuhrten Impfungen sind bei Diabetespatienten gut wirksam und sicher und haben insbesondere keine negativen Auswirkungen auf den Diabetes mellitus. Zusatzlich sind Auffrischimpfungen (z. B. gegen Tetanus, Pertussis usw.) je nach Impfanamnese und Alter, ebenso Reiseimpfungen und andere Impfungen je nach Indikationen vorzunehmen.

Despite many novel diagnostic strategies and advances in treatment, infective endocarditis (IE) remains a severe disease. The epidemiology of IE has shifted and staphylococci have replaced streptococci as the most common cause and nosocomially acquired infections, invasive procedures, indwelling cardiac devices and acquired infections due to intravenous drug abuse are more frequent. The incidence of IE has steadily increased in recent years and the patients affected are older and have more comorbidities. The modern treatment of IE is interdisciplinary. The pharmacotherapy of IE depends on the pathogen and its sensitivity. The presence of a bioprosthetic valve and implantable cardiac devices plays a significant role in selection of antibiotics and duration of treatment. This article provides an update and overview of the current clinical practice in diagnostics and pharmacotherapy of IE in adults with a special focus on partial oral therapy and the role of aminoglycosides.

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PcP) has for many years been reported mostly in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. Increasingly, it also affects other immunocompromised patients, e.g. after organ or allogeneic stem cell/bone marrow transplantation, patients with hematologic malignancies or autoimmune diseases. The diagnosis of PcP relies on a critical evaluation of clinical symptoms, risk factors, radiologic features and microbiological tests. High dose cotrimoxazole is the most effective therapeutic option. Rapid initiation is essential, since mortality is especially high in patients admitted to intensive care with respiratory failure. This article reviews the current epidemiology of PcP and highlights the diagnostic and therapeutic options. Recommendations for primary and secondary prophylaxis are summarized.

Infectious diseases have recently gained wide public interest. Emerging infections and rising rates of antibiotic resistance are determining this trend. Both challenges will need to be addressed in international and local collaborations between different specialties in medicine and basic science. Infectious diseases as a clinical specialty in this scenario is directly responsible for the care of patients with infectious diseases. Its involvement in the care of patients with complicated infections has proved to be highly effective. Antibiotic stewardship programmes are effective measures in slowing the development of antibiotic resistance and have been widely implemented. But antibiotic stewardship specialists should not be confused with or taken as an alternative to infectious disease experts. Infectious diseases requires appropriate and specific training. It mainly uses the instrumentarium of internal medicine. With the current challenges in modern medicine, infectious diseases in Germany should thus be upgraded from a subspecialty to a clinical specialty, ideally within Internal Medicine.

Ergebnisse einer S2k-Konsensuskonferenz der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Gastroenterologie, Verdauungsund Stoffwechselerkrankungen (DGVS) gemeinsam mit der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Innere Medizin (DGIM), der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Hygiene und Mikrobiologie (DGHM), der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Infektiologie (DGI), der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Krankenhaushygiene e. V. (DGKH), der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Pathologie (DGP), der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Tropenmedizin und Internationale Gesundheit (DTG), dem ROBERT-KOCHINSTITUT (RKI) und der Paul-Ehrlich Gesellschaft fur Chemotherapie e.V. (PEG)

We surveyed European medical schools regarding teaching of prudent antibiotic prescribing in the undergraduate curriculum. We performed a cross-sectional survey in 13 European countries (Belgium, Croatia, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Serbia, Slovenia, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom) in 2013. Proportional sampling was used, resulting in the selection of two to four medical schools per country. A standardized questionnaire based on literature review and validated by a panel of experts was sent to lecturers in infectious diseases, medical microbiology and clinical pharmacology. In-depth interviews were conducted with four lecturers. Thirty-five of 37 medical schools were included in the study. Prudent antibiotic use principles were taught in all but one medical school, but only four of 13 countries had a national programme. Interactive teaching formats were used less frequently than passive formats. The teaching was mandatory for 53% of the courses and started before clinical training in 71%. We observed wide variations in exposure of students to important principles of prudent antibiotic use among countries and within the same country. Some major principles were poorly covered (e.g. reassessment and duration of antibiotic therapy, communication skills). Whereas 77% of the respondents fully agreed that the teaching of these principles should be prioritized, lack of time, mainly due to rigid curriculum policies, was the main reported barrier to implementation. Given the study design, these are probably optimistic results. Teaching of prudent antibiotic prescribing principles should be improved. National and European programmes for development of specific learning outcomes or competencies are urgently needed. Clinical Microbiology and Infection © 2014 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved

The human intestinal microbiome has important metabolic and immunological functions for the host and is part of the defense against pathogens in the gastrointestinal tract. Antibiotics, probiotics, dietary measures, such as prebiotics, and the relatively newly established method of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT, also known as fecal microbiome transfer) all influence the intestinal microbiome. The FMT procedure comprises the transmission of fecal microorganisms from a healthy donor into the gastrointestinal tract of a patient. The aim of this intervention is to restore a normal microbiome in patients with diseases associated with dysbiosis. The only indication for FMT is currently multiple recurrence of Clostridium difficile infections. Approximately 85% of affected patients can be successfully treated by FMT compared to only about 30% treated conventionally with vancomycin. Other possible therapeutic applications are chronic inflammatory and functional bowel diseases, insulin resistance and morbid obesity but these have to be evaluated further in clinical trials. Knowledge on the optimal donor, the best dosage and the most appropriate route of administration is still limited. A careful donor selection is necessary. The implementation of FMT in Germany is subject to the Medicines Act (Arzneimittelgesetz, AMG) with a duty of disclosure and personal implementation by the attending physician. By documentation in a central register long-term effects and side effects of FMT have to be evaluated.

Infektionskrankheiten stellen unzweifelhaft eine grose Herausforderung fur die Menschheit dar. Durch eine Reihe von Besonderheiten – wie z. B. die Ubertragbarkeit, das Potenzial zu epidemischer Ausbreitung, das Zusammenspiel von Umwelt- und Wirtsfaktoren und viele andere mehr – unterscheiden sie sich grundsatzlich von anderen Erkrankungen [ 1 ]. Wie kann angesichts aktueller und kunftiger Entwicklungen die klinische Versorgung von Patienten mit Infektionskrankheiten sichergestellt werden?

The medical treatment of migrants and refugees has recently become an important topic in the German healthcare system due to the large numbers of migrants. Healthcare for migrants includes treatment of acute illnesses and trauma on arrival, screening for chronic communicable and non-communicable diseases and in the long term, the integration into the local healthcare system. As health problems of migrants are diverse and dependent on the region of origin, guidelines should be readily available for all healthcare professionals involved in migrant healthcare. A literature search for comprehensive guidelines for screening and treatment of migrant's health problems detected 47 different guidelines including 2 comprehensive ones from the US Centers of Disease Control and Prevention and the Canadian Collaboration for Immigrant and Refugee Health. Comparative analysis of these guidelines could be a starting point for evidence-based European guidelines on migrant health.

Objective: The primary aim of the study was to compare the metabolic side effects of a nucleoside analogue- containing regimen with a nucleoside analogue-sparing double protease inhibitor regimen. A secondary goal was to test for efficacy of a double-PI regimen. Design: Multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III clinical trial. Subjects: Adult HIV-1-infected individuals naive to antiretroviral therapy with viral load above 400 HIV-RNA copies/ml were randomized (1:1) to either 400 mg lopinavir /100 mg ritonavir (LPV/r) BID plus 150 mg lamivudine/300 mg zidovudine (CBV) BID versus LPV/r BID plus 300 mg atazanavir (ATV) QD. Main outcome measure was the virologic failure in both groups, defined as viral load � 50 copies/ml at week 48. Results: In the CBV/LPV/r-arm, 29 out of 35 patients ((83%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 66.9-92.2%) and 18 out of 40 patients (45%; 95% CI 29.7-61.5%) in the ATV/LPV/r-arm had a HIV-RNA level

Objective: To develop a consensus-based set of generic competencies in antimicrobial prescribing and stewardship for European prescribers through a structured consensus procedure. Methods: The RAND-modified Delphi procedure comprised two online questionnaire rounds, a face-to-face meeting between rounds, and a final review. Our departure point was a set of competencies agreed previously by consensus among a UK multi-disciplinary panel, and which had been subsequently revised through consultation with ESCMID Study Group representatives. The 46 draft competency points were reviewed by an expert panel consisting of specialists in infectious diseases and clinical microbiology, and pharmacists. Each proposed competency was assessed using a nine-point Likert scale, for relevance as a minimum standard for all independent prescribers in all European countries. Results: A total of 65 expert panel members participated, from 24 European countries (one to six experts per country). There was very high satisfaction (98%) with the final competencies set, which included 35 competency points, in three sections: core concepts in microbiology, pathogenesis and diagnosing infections (11 points); antimicrobial prescribing (20 points); and antimicrobial stewardship (4 points). Conclusions: The consensus achieved enabled the production of generic antimicrobial prescribing and stewardship competencies for all European independent prescribers, and of possible global utility. These can be used for training and can be further adapted to the needs of specific professional groups., peer-reviewed

OBJECTIVE: Staphylococcus aureus is a leading cause of bloodstream infection and S. aureus bacteremia (SAB) is one of the most severe infections acquired in hospital or in the community. The epidemiology and prognosis of this infection in Germany is not fully understood because of the lack of prospective data. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter cohort study (INSTINCT, Invasive Staphylococcus aureus Infection Cohort) was initiated to record and analyse data on patients with SAB through an internet-based documentation. Data are being obtained by specially trained personnel. Clinical variables recorded are comorbidities, risk factors, clinical course, therapy, complications and outcome. Prospectively acquired data from 1 January 2006 to 31 October 2007 are now available from two of the study centers. RESULTS: During this period 263 patients with SAB were identified. 52 % of patients had hospital-acquired infections, 28 % had non-nosocomial but healthcare-associated infections, and 20 % had community-acquired infections. The mean patient age was 61 years, 38 % of patients were female. 62 % of the patients had primary bloodstream infections, while 38 % had a secondary bacteremia, diagnosed on the basis of an underlying organ infection with S. AUREUS. The mean duration of bacteremia was 3.3 days. Average duration of hospitalization was 27 days. The seven-day mortality was 8 % and in-hospital mortality 22 %. CONCLUSIONS: SAB is a common infection in Germany with a serious prognosis.

ObjectivesPEPDar compared the tolerability and safety of ritonavir-boosted darunavir (DRV/r)-based post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) with the tolerability and safety of standard of care (SOC). The primary endpoint was the early discontinuation rate among the per-protocol population. MethodsPEPDar was an open-label, randomized, multicentre, prospective, noninferiority safety study. Subjects were stratified by type of event (occupational vs. nonoccupational, i.e. sexual) and were randomized to receive DRV/r plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) or SOC PEP. Twenty-two private or university HIV clinics in Germany participated. Subjects were 18 years old and had documented or potential HIV exposure and indication for HIV PEP. They initiated PEP not later than 72 h after the event and were HIV negative. ResultsA total of 324 subjects were screened, the per-protocol population was 305, and 273 subjects completed the study. One hundred and fifty-five subjects received DRV/r-based PEP and 150 subjects received ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r)-based PEP for 28-30 days;298 subjects also received tenofovir/emtricitabine. The early discontinuation rate in the DRV/r arm was 6.5% compared with 10.0% in the SOC arm (P = 0.243). Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported in 68% of DRV/r subjects and 75% of SOC subjects (P = 0.169). Fewer DRV/r subjects (16.1%) had at least one grade 2 or 3 ADR compared with SOC subjects (29.3%) (P = 0.006). All grades of diarrhoea, nausea, and sleep disorders were significantly less frequent with DRV/r, while headache was significantly more frequent. No HIV seroconversion was reported during follow-up. ConclusionsNoninferiority of DRV/r to SOC was demonstrated. DRV/r should be included as a standard component of recommended regimens in PEP guidelines.

The complexity and diversity of the human intestinal microbiome has only recently been characterized. The multiple metabolic and immunologic effects of the bacterial flora have demonstrated the symbiosis between the microbiome and its host. This symbiosis is disturbed in a multitude of diseases, especially in critically ill patients.A review of the changes in the intestinal microbiome of critically ill patients and the use of probiotics.Nonsystematic literature search in PubMed on the topics: (1) changes in the intestinal microbiome in critically ill patients, (2) interventions using probiotics in critically ill patients, and (3) use of fecal transplantation in Clostridium difficile colitis.Trauma, sepsis, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and other conditions lead to shifts in the composition of the intestinal microbiome, which are correlated with clinical outcome. The most obvious change is a profound loss of obligate anaerobe bacteria, leading also to metabolic changes. Probiotics have been used in several studies and show efficacy in the reduction of infectious complication but not in overall mortality. C. difficile colitis as the model disease for a disturbed microbiome can be treated effectively by transfer of donor feces, which also restores the diversity of the microbiome.Taking into account the successful intervention of fecal transplantation on the intestinal microbiome, new products developed using the current knowledge of the intestinal microbiome could be more effective.

Temozolomide, a recently approved cytotoxic agent for the treatment of malignant glioma, has shown promising results in the treatment studies published so far. However, cytopenia and related infectious complications have been reported in 2-8% of cases. Here we present three treatment-naive patients with malignant glioma experiencing cytopenia and/or infectious complications after the first cycle of temozolomide. Neutrophils obtained from each patient up to 6 weeks after the end of the temozolomide application showed normal phagocytic capacity but decreased oxygen radical production and thus impairment of microcidal activity. Our data suggest that a prolonged impairment of the immunological defense may occur in temozolomide-treated patients.

The taxonomic positions of Isospora belli and other members of the genus Isospora are controversial. We determined the small-subunit ribosomal RNA of I. belli and used this sequence in combination with other coccidian RNA sequences for analysis of the taxonomic position of I. belli. The phylogenetic trees we obtained provide molecular evidence for three clades within a monophyletic group that represents the suborder Eimeriina. The clade containing I. belli consists of tissue-cyst-forming coccidia (Toxoplasma and Neospora) and members of the genus Isospora (I. ohioensis, I. suis, I. belli). The second clade, representing a sister clade of that containing the Isospora species, contains members of the genus Sarcocystis. The third one consists of members of the family Eimeriidae, including Eimeria and Cyclospora species. This shows that although I. belli as well as other members of the genus Isospora belong to the suborder Eimeriina, the family to which they belong is not Eimeriidae but rather Sarcocystidae. We suggest that the genus Isospora should be removed from the family Eimeriidae and placed into the family Sarcocystidae within the suborder Eimeriina.