1. Effects of year-round stocking rate and stocking method systems on performance of cow-calf pairs in the gulf coast region of the United States1
- Author
-
J.M. Gillespie, D.C. Blouin, W.E. Wyatt, and B.C. Venuto
- Subjects
geography ,geography.geographical_feature_category ,biology ,Ecology ,Lolium multiflorum ,Cow-calf ,Cynodon dactylon ,Beef cattle ,biology.organism_classification ,Pasture ,Stocking ,Animal science ,Grazing ,Animal Science and Zoology ,Paspalum dilatatum ,Food Science - Abstract
The present research is the second phase (2 yr) of a multiyear cow-calf project examining the effect of stocking method, i.e., continuous and rotational, and fixed stocking rate on beef-cattle production. Two sets of 4 adjacent pastures, each containing a mixed warm-season, perennial grass sod [common bermudagrass, Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.; dallisgrass, Paspalum dilatatum Poir.], were overseeded to ‘Marshall’ annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) in the autumn of 2 consecutive years. Within each set of 4 pastures, 1 of the following grazing treatments was randomly assigned each pasture: rotationally stocked (8 paddocks) at a low, medium, or high stocking rate (RL, RM, and RH) and continuously stocked at a moderate stocking rate (CM). Low, medium, and high stocking rates were 1.25, 2, and 2.75 cows/ha. Brangus cow-calf pairs were stocked on treatment pastures in March 2004. Mean cow BW was greater for RL compared with RM (P 0.20) for the RM versus RH (522 kg) and the RM versus CM (530 kg) stocking-treatment comparisons. Calf-adjusted 205-d BW was similar for all treatment contrasts. Pasture weaning BW differed between the RL versus RM (P
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF