Search

Background: Immune checkpoint immunotherapy (CPI) targeting programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/ligand (PD-L1) has been shown to be an effective treatment for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN). This includes those with multidrug resistance, ultra-high-risk disease, and epithelioid trophoblastic tumour/placental site trophoblastic tumour subtypes that are inherently chemotherapy resistant, but there is also emerging evidence in low-risk disease. Objectives: We set out to generate an overview of the current data supporting the use of CPI for GTN in both high-risk and low-risk disease and to consider future research goals and directions in order to implement CPI in current treatment guidelines. Methods: We identified and reviewed the published data on the use of CPI agents in GTN. Outcome: 133 patients were identified who had been treated with CPI for GTN with pembrolizumab (23), avelumab (22), camrelizumab (57), toripalimab (15), or other anti-PD-1 agents (16), of whom 118 had high-risk diseases, relapse or multi-drug resistant disease, and 15 low-risk diseases. Overall 85 patients achieved complete remission, 77 (of 118) with high-risk disease, and 8 (of 15) with low-risk disease. 1 patient with complete remission in the high-risk group developed a relapse 22 months after anti-PD-1 treatment had been stopped. Treatment was generally well tolerated across studies. Conclusions and Outlook: The majority of high-risk patients (77/118) treated with CPI are cured and this is particularly relevant amongst those with chemotherapy resistant disease who otherwise have very limited treatment options. Priorities for future research include determining whether these agents have a role earlier in the disease course, the utility of combination with chemotherapy, and effects on future fertility. Treatment availability remains a concern due to the high price of these agents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

One important advantage of using LAFOV PET/CT for imaging SP 89 sp Zr-labelled monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), i.e., immunoPET, is the substantial increase in sensitivity compared with standard axial field-of-view (SAFOV) PET/CT systems, which may lead to a remarkable image quality improvement. This article is part of the Topical Collection on Image of the month Long axial field-of-view (LAFOV) PET/CT scanners have been introduced recently [[1]], which offer numerous advantages [[3]]. Both patients were informed about the study aims, procedures (one additional PET/CT scan on the same day with the planned PET/CT), and the need to acquire an additional low-dose CT scan. [Extracted from the article]

Purpose: To identify factors associated with (perceived) access to health care among (ex-)breast cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Cross-sectional study within a large prospective, multicenter cohort of (ex-)breast cancer patients, i.e., UMBRELLA. All participants enrolled in the UMBRELLA cohort between October 2013 and April 2020 were sent a COVID-19-specific survey, including the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) questionnaire. Results: In total, 1051 (66.0%) participants completed the survey. During COVID-19, 284 (27.0%) participants reported clinically relevant increased levels of anxiety and/or depression, i.e., total HADS score ≥ 12. Participants with anxiety and/or depression reported statistically significant higher barriers to contact their general practitioner (47.5% vs. 25.0%, resp.) and breast cancer physicians (26.8% vs. 11.2%, resp.) compared to participants without these symptoms. In addition, a higher proportion of participants with anxiety and/or depression reported that their current treatment or (after)care was affected by COVID-19 compared to those without these symptoms (32.7% vs. 20.5%, resp.). Factors independently associated with symptoms of anxiety and/or depression during COVID-19 were pre-existent anxiety (OR 6.1, 95% CI 4.1–9.2) or depression (OR 6.0, 95% CI 3.5–10.2). Conclusion: During the COVID-19 pandemic, (ex-)breast cancer patients with symptoms of anxiety and/or depression experience higher barriers to contact health care providers. Also, they more often report that their health care was affected by COVID-19. Risk factors for anxiety and/or depression during COVID-19 are pre-existent symptoms of anxiety or depression. Extra attention—including mental health support—is needed for this group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Oncoplastic breast conserving surgery (OP-BCS) is becoming increasingly popular to avoid mastectomy or optimize cosmetic outcomes of breast conserving surgery (BCS). Few studies have compared clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of OP-BCS to conventional BCS (C-BCS). This study aims to compare clinical outcomes and short and long-term PROs after OP-BCS and C-BCS in a large prospective breast cancer cohort., Methods: Women in the prospective, multicenter UMBRELLA-breast cancer cohort who underwent OP-BCS or C-BCS were included. Clinical outcomes and PROs (measured by EORTC QLQ-C30/BR23) up to 24 months postoperatively were evaluated. Mixed-model analysis was performed to assess differences in PROs over time between groups., Results: 1628 (84.9%) patients received C-BCS and 290 (15.1%) OP-BCS. After C-BCS and OP-BCS, free resection margins were obtained in 84.2% (n = 1370) and 86.2% (n = 250), respectively, reoperation for re-exision of margins <3 months occurred in 5.3% (n = 86) and 4.8% (n = 14), median time interval from surgery until adjuvant systemic therapy was 66 and 63 days, and 36 and 41 days until radiotherapy. Shortly postoperative, OP-BCS was associated with statistically significant lower mean scores for physical functioning (83.6 vs 87.2) and body image (82.8 vs 89.4) and more pain (19.8 vs 26.5) and breast symptoms (22.7 vs 30.3) than C-BCS. Body image scores remained significantly less favorable after OP-BSC than C-BCS up to 24 months postoperatively (87.8 vs 92.2)., Conclusions: Oncoplastic surgery safely enables BCS, but may lead to less favorable long-term body image compared to C-BCS. These findings are important for patient education and shared decision-making., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

In stage III breast carcinoma, metastasized disease needs to be determined. In the past, conventional imaging by liver ultrasound, chest X-ray and bone scintigraphy was the work-up of choice. Recently, FDG-PET/CT was found to have additional value, but clinicians are hesitant to introduce this technique. We present three patients in whom FDG-PET/CT was applied. A 61-year-old woman with stage III breast carcinoma after conventional work-up was upstaged to stage IV breast carcinoma by FDG-PET/CT, upon which her treatment was changed. A 55-year-old woman suspected of stage IV breast carcinoma after conventional imaging was downstaged to stage III after FDG-PET/CT. Her treatment was changed as well. In a 78-year-old woman with recurrent breast carcinoma, the diagnostic certainty of stage III breast carcinoma was increased by FDG-PET/CT. We conclude that FDG-PET/CT is valuable for adequately diagnosing metastases in patients with stage III breast carcinoma and can replace conventional imaging.