Search

The broad acceptance of sustainable and renewable energy sources as a means of integrating them into electrical power networks is essential to promote sustainable development. Microgrids using direct currents (DCs) are becoming more and more popular because of their great energy efficiency and straightforward design. In this work, we discuss the control of a PV-based renewable energy system and a battery- and supercapacitor-based energy storage system in a DC microgrid. We describe a hierarchical control approach based on sliding-mode controllers and the Lyapunov stability theory. To balance the load and generation, a fuzzy logic-based energy management system has been created. Using a neural network, maximum power defects for the PV system were determined. The global asymptotic stability of the framework has been verified using Lyapunov stability analysis. In order to simulate the proposed DC microgrid and controllers, MATLAB/SimulinkR (2019a) was utilized. The outcomes show that the system operates effectively with changing production and consumption. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper investigates the performance of the current model predictive control (CMPC) for controlling a two-stage transformerless grid-connected photovoltaic (PV) system under grid fault conditions. A maximum power point tracking (MPPT) controller was used to extract the maximum power of the PV panel. To stabilize the DC link and generate the reference current values, a proportionalintegral (PI) controller was used. The CMPC strategy was implemented to control the output current of the inverter that connects the PV system to the utility grid. The system and control strategy were simulated via a MATLAB/Simulink environment. The performance of the proposed control strategy was investigated under fault conditions between the three-phase two-level inverter and the grid. Moreover, to validate the capability of the CMPC, comparative case studies were conducted between CMPC, PI, and sliding mode control (SMC) under grid fault. Case studies' results showed that under grid fault, CMPC did not introduce any overshoot or undershoot in the PV output DC current and power. However, PI and SMC produced undershoots of almost 15 kW for the output power and 45 A for the output current. Under the fault conditions, the active output power and three-phase current recovery time of the inverter was 50 ms using CMPC, compared to PI and SMC with recovery times of 80 ms and 60 ms, respectively. Moreover, a voltage dip of 75 V at the DC link voltage was recorded with CMPC under faulty conditions, while the voltage dips for PI and SMC were around 180 V. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]