Search

Objectives: The most appropriate targets for systolic blood pressure (SBP) levels to reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with symptomatic artery disease remain controversial. We compared the rate of subsequent ischemic events or death according to mean SBP levels during follow-up., Design: Prospective cohort study. FRENA is an ongoing registry of stable outpatients with symptomatic coronary (CAD), cerebrovascular (CVD) or peripheral artery disease (PAD)., Setting: 24 Spanish hospitals., Participants: 4789 stable outpatients with vascular disease., Results: As of June 2017, 4789 patients had been enrolled in different Spanish centres. Of these, 1722 (36%) had CAD, 1383 (29%) CVD and 1684 (35%) PAD. Over a mean follow-up of 18 months, 136 patients suffered subsequent myocardial infarction, 125 had ischemic stroke, 74 underwent limb amputation, and 260 died. On multivariable analysis, CVD patients with mean SBP levels 130-140 mm Hg had a lower risk of mortality than those with levels <130 mm Hg (hazard ratio (HR): 0.39; 95% CI: 0.20-0.77), as did those with levels >140 mm Hg (HR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.26-0.84). PAD patients with mean SBP levels >140 mm Hg had a lower risk for subsequent ischemic events (HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.39-0.83) and those with levels 130-140 mm Hg (HR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.29-0.78) or >140 mm Hg (HR: 0.32; 95% CI: 0.21-0.50) had a lower risk of mortality. We found no differences in patients with CAD., Conclusions: In this real-world cohort of symptomatic arterial disease patients, most of whom are not eligible for clinical trials, the risk of subsequent events and death varies according to the levels of SBP and the location of previous events. Especially among patients with large artery atherosclerosis, PAD or CVD, SBP <130 mm Hg may result in increased mortality. Due to potential factors in this issue, Prospective, well designed studies are warranted to confirm these observational data.

Background and Objectives: The brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) is one of the most widely used arterial stiffness variables for assessing vascular risk. The abiPWV is a device that calculates various PWVs and the blood pressure ankle-brachial index (ABI). The device can also determine baPWV. The aim of this study was to calculate the baPWV with abiPWV, validate it with a reference device (VaSera) and study its clinical usefulness., Patients and Methods: We studied 113 patients (mean age, 53±12years), 59 (52%) of whom were women, and 10 (8.8%) of whom had a previous cardiovascular event. The participants were classified according to cardiovascular risk factors (CRFs) into groupI (none), groupII (1 or 2 CRFs) and groupIII (3 or more CRFs). The patients with a previous cardiovascular event were included in groupIII. All participants had their baPWV measured with abiPWV and VaSera., Results: The baPWV correlation between the 2 devices was r=0.93 (P<.001), and the percentage error calculated with the Bland-Altman analysis was 4.5%. The baPWV measured with abiPWV (in m/s) was as follows: groupI, 10.5±1.6; groupII, 13.8±2.9 (P<.001 when compared with groupI); and groupIII, 14.1±2.7 (P<.001 when compared with groupI). There were no differences between groupsII and III. The results with VaSera were comparable to those of abiPWV., Conclusions: Measuring baPWV with the abiPWV is safe and has a similar clinical utility to that of VaSera. Incorporating this function into the options of abiPWV makes it a complete device for assessing arterial stiffness., (Copyright © 2020. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U.)

Background and Objectives: The brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) is one of the most widely used arterial stiffness variables for assessing vascular risk. The abiPWV is a device that calculates various PWVs and the blood pressure ankle-brachial index (ABI). The device can also determine baPWV. The aim of this study was to calculate the baPWV with abiPWV, validate it with a reference device (VaSera) and study its clinical usefulness., Patients and Methods: We studied 113 patients (mean age, 53 ± 12 years), 59 (52%) of whom were women, and 10 (8.8%) of whom had a previous cardiovascular event. The participants were classified according to cardiovascular risk factors (CRFs) into group I (none), group II (1 or 2 CRFs) and group III (3 or more CRFs). The patients with a previous cardiovascular event were included in group III. All participants had their baPWV measured with abiPWV and VaSera., Results: The baPWV correlation between the 2 devices was r = 0.93 (p < .001), and the percentage error calculated with the Bland-Altman analysis was 4.5%. The baPWV measured with abiPWV (in m/s) was as follows: group I, 10.5 ± 1.6; group II, 13.8 ± 2.9 (p < .001 when compared with group I); and group III, 14.1 ± 2.7 (p < .001 when compared with group I). There were no differences between groups II and III. The results with VaSera were comparable to those of abiPWV., Conclusions: Measuring baPWV with the abiPWV is safe and has a similar clinical utility to that of VaSera. Incorporating this function into the options of abiPWV makes it a complete device for assessing arterial stiffness., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U.)

Bagkground and Aims: The influence of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on outcome in patients with symptomatic artery disease remains controversial., Methods: FRENA is a prospective registry of consecutive outpatients with symptomatic coronary (CAD), cerebrovascular (CVD) or peripheral artery disease (PAD). We compared the risk for subsequent ischemic events or death according to the use of PPIs., Results: As of December 2016, 5170 patients were recruited: 1793 (35%) had CAD, 1530 (30%) CVD and 1847 (35%) had PAD. Overall, 2289 patients (44%) were regularly using PPIs. During a median follow-up of 36 months, 172 patients suffered a recurrent myocardial infarction, 139 had ischemic stroke, 71 underwent limb amputation and 267 died (cardiovascular death, 109). On multivariable analysis, patients using PPIs were at a lower risk for subsequent limb amputation (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.53; 95%CI: 0.30-0.94), a similar risk for myocardial infarction (HR: 0.78; 95%CI: 0.55-1.10) or stroke (HR: 0.93; 95%CI: 0.64-1.35) and at a higher risk of death (HR: 1.37; 95%CI: 1.04-1.79)., Conclusions: Among stable outpatients with symptomatic artery disease, the use of PPIs was associated with a lower risk for subsequent ischemic events but a higher risk for death., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)