Purpose: Report the clinical findings, risk factors, treatment, and visual outcomes associated with Streptococcus endophthalmitis in comparison to culture-positive endophthalmitis associated with non- Streptococcus species., Methods: A retrospective chart review of adults between 18 and 89 years of age diagnosed with exogenous culture-positive endophthalmitis between January 1, 2009, and January 1, 2018, at the Duke Eye Center (Durham, North Carolina) with at least six months of follow-up from time of initial diagnosis was conducted. Clinical data including patient demographics, ocular history, baseline corrected visual acuity (VA) prior to presentation, time to presentation, presenting exam findings, VA at presentation, presumed etiology of endophthalmitis, medical and surgical management, and VA at the six-month follow-up was extracted and statistically analyzed., Results: Fifty-six eyes from 56 patients with culture-positive endophthalmitis were identified. Eyes with Streptococcus (n=18) had elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) at presentation (p=0.002), worse mean VA (Snellen) at presentation (20/14159 vs. 20/3098, p<0.001), and worse mean VA (Snellen) at six months (20/3475 vs. 20/235, p<0.001) compared to non- Streptococcus cases (n=38). Time to presentation (days) (median, IQR) was longer in eyes that underwent glaucoma surgery for both Streptococcus (2241 (836, 3709) vs. 3 (2, 31), p=0.003) and non- Streptococcus endophthalmitis (1236 (125, 3582) vs. 6 (4, 25), p<0.0001). There was no difference in VA at six months between Streptococcus and non- Streptococcus eyes based on treatment. Conclusions: Streptococci are rare but important causes of exogenous endophthalmitis, and in our study, they were associated with worse visual outcomes than non- Streptococci . A history of any glaucoma surgery, even procedures performed years earlier, should be elicited when evaluating patients with ocular symptoms., Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Duke University Health System Institutional Review Board issued approval Pro00091062. Review charts and access patient data components were determined to be in compliance with all applicable Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) regulations. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Woodward et al.)