Search

Background/aims: Excessive use of antibiotics has led to development of antibiotic resistance and other antibiotic-associated complications. Dermatologists prescribe more antibiotics per clinician than any other major specialty, with much of this use for acne. Alternative acne treatments are available but are used much less often than antibiotics, at least partially because dermatologists feel that they are less effective. Spironolactone, a hormonal therapy with antiandrogen effects that can address the hormonal pathogenesis of acne, may represent a therapeutic alternative to oral antibiotics for women with acne. However, the comparative effects of spironolactone and oral antibiotics in the treatment of acne have not been definitively studied. The Spironolactone versus Doxycycline for Acne: A Comparative Effectiveness, Noninferiority Evaluation (SD-ACNE) trial aims to answer whether spironolactone, in addition to standard topical therapy, is noninferior to doxycycline (an oral antibiotic) for women with acne. Several interesting challenges arose in the development of this study, including determining acceptability of the comparative regimens to participating dermatologists, identifying data to support a noninferiority margin, and establishing a process for unblinding participants after they completed the study while maintaining the blind for study investigators., Methods: We present the scientific and clinical rationale for the decisions made in the design of the trial, including input from key stakeholders through a Delphi consensus process., Results: The Spironolactone versus Doxycycline for Acne: A Comparative Effectiveness, Noninferiority Evaluation trial (NCT04582383) is being conducted at a range of community and academic sites in the United States. To maximize external validity and inform clinical practice, the study is designed with broad eligibility criteria and no prohibition of use of topical medications. Participants in the trial will be randomized to receive either spironolactone 100 mg/day or doxycycline hyclate 100 mg/day for 16 weeks. The primary outcome is the absolute decrease in inflammatory lesion count, and we have established a noninferiority margin of four inflammatory lesions. Secondary outcomes include the percentage of participants achieving Investigator Global Assessment success, change in quality of life, and microbiome changes and diversity., Conclusions: The Spironolactone versus Doxycycline for Acne: A Comparative Effectiveness, Noninferiority Evaluation trial will have substantial implications for the treatment of acne and antibiotic stewardship. In addition, this study will provide important information on the effect of these systemic agents on the development of changes to the microbiome and antibiotic resistance in a healthy population of patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: J.S.B. has received consulting fees from Dexcel Pharma for work unrelated to this study.

Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest Dr Perry is a consultant for Rubrum Advising. Dr Barbieri is a consultant for Honeydew Care and Dexcel Pharma.

Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest Dr Barbieri has received consulting fees from Dexcel Pharma and Honeydew Care for work unrelated to the current submission. The remaining authors have no other conflicts to declare.

Importance: Isotretinoin is the only medical acne treatment capable of inducing acne remission; however, some patients experience acne relapse and require retrials of isotretinoin. There is a need to understand who is most at risk and how daily dose and cumulative dosage can influence outcomes., Objective: To assess rates of acne relapse and isotretinoin retrial and to identify associated factors among patients with acne who received an isotretinoin treatment course., Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used data from the MarketScan commercial claims database from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2020, to identify patients with acne who were 12 years or older and had received isotretinoin for 4 months or longer, with at least 1 year of continuous enrollment after completion of isotretinoin. Data analyses were performed from June 30, 2024, to August 1, 2024., Main Outcomes and Measures: Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to quantify associations of patient demographic and treatment characteristics with acne relapse and isotretinoin retrial., Results: A total of 19 907 patients (mean [SD] age, 20.6 [7.8] years; 10 504 females [52.8%]) were included, among whom 4482 (22.5%) had acne relapse and 1639 (8.2%) had isotretinoin retrial. Female sex (hazard ratio [HR], 1.43; 95% CI, 1.35-1.52) was significantly associated with increased rates of acne relapse, and isotretinoin cumulative dosage (mg/kg) was associated with a decreased rate of acne relapse (HR, 0.996; 95% CI, 0.995-0.997). Furthermore, daily dose was not associated with decreased risk of acne relapse or isotretinoin retrial among those with conventional and high cumulative dosages. Female sex (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.62-0.76) and isotretinoin cumulative dosage (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.98-0.99) were associated with decreased rates of isotretinoin retrial. Stratification by cumulative dosage indicated that higher cumulative dosage was associated with decreased rates of retrial among patients with low (<120 mg/kg) and conventional (120-220 mg/kg), but not high (>220 mg/kg) cumulative dosage. Maximum daily dose (mg/kg/d) was not negatively associated with acne relapse or isotretinoin retrial in patients with cumulative dosage of 120 mg/kg or more., Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cohort study suggest that higher cumulative dosage may potentially reduce risk of acne relapse and isotretinoin retrial. Furthermore, daily dose was not associated with decreased risk of the outcomes for conventional and high cumulative dosage; therefore, daily dosing could be individualized to patient goals and preferences.

Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest Dr Cohen serves on a data and safety monitoring board for Advarra and has served as a consultant for Novartis, Takeda, and GSK. Dr Barbieri has received consulting fees from Dexcel Pharma and Honeydew Care for work unrelated to the present submission. Authors Lowry and Nock have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Although many treatments are available for acne, these can be limited by lack of effectiveness, patient tolerance and adherence, and accessibility. This review provides a comprehensive summary of the latest developments in acne management, exploring a range of topical, systemic, and procedural treatments. The mechanisms of action, pivotal trial data, and potential role in clinical practice are reviewed for emerging therapies such as 1726 nm laser, sarecycline, clascoterone, trifarotene, minocycline foam, and fixed-dose combination topicals. The clinical pipeline is also summarized. In addition, opportunities to improve the patient experience with spironolactone and isotretinoin are discussed., Competing Interests: Disclosure Dr J.S. Barbieri has received consulting fees from Dexcel pharma., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Importance: Clinical productivity measures may incentivize clinical care to specific patient populations and thus perpetuate inequitable care. Before the 2021 Medicare physician fee schedule changes, outpatient dermatology encounters for patients who were younger, female, and races other than White systematically generated fewer work relative value units (wRVUs)., Objective: To examine the association of patient race, age, and sex with wRVUs generated by outpatient dermatology encounters after 2021., Design, Setting, and Participants: This multi-institutional cross-sectional study evaluated demographic and billing data for outpatient dermatology encounters across 3 academic dermatology practices. The study compared wRVUs generated by outpatient general dermatology encounters in 6-month periods before and after the 2021 fee schedule updates (March 1 to August 31, 2019, and March 1 to August 31, 2021). Eligibility required an age of 18 years or older and available age, race, and sex data. Data analysis was performed from September 2022 to March 2024., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was wRVUs generated per encounter., Results: This study included 89 656 encounters (47 607 before the 2021 Medicare physician fee schedule update and 42 049 after the update). Across all encounters, the mean (SD) patient age was 56.3 (17.8) years; 55 460 encounters (61.9%) were with female patients and 34 196 (38.1%) were with male patients; and 3457 encounters (3.9%) were with Asian patients, 10 478 (11.7%) with Black patients, 72 894 (81.3%) with White patients, and 2287 (3.2%) with patients of other race or ethnicity (Latino and multiracial). The mean (SD) wRVUs per outpatient dermatology encounter was 1.44 (0.88) before the update and 1.80 (0.99) after (P < .001). After 2021, adjusted analyses demonstrated significantly fewer wRVUs per encounter for female (β, -0.11; 95% CI, -0.13 to -0.10) compared with male patients, and for younger (β, 0.04 [95% CI, 0.04 to 0.05] per 10-year increase in age) compared with older patients. After the update, compared with White patients, visits with Asian patients generated fewer wRVUs (β, -0.12; 95% CI, -0.17 to -0.08) as did visits with Black patients (β, -0.14; 95% CI, -0.17 to -0.11), both statistically significant reductions compared with prior comparisons (P < .001 for both). After 2021, mediation analysis identified that premalignant destructions and biopsies mediated many of the remaining differences in wRVU generation by patient age, race, and sex., Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that after the 2021 Medicare fee schedule updates, there was a persistent, albeit reduced, gap between wRVU productivity in outpatient dermatology visits for Asian and Black compared with White patients. These persisting differences were attributable to skin biopsies and cryotherapy of premalignant lesions.

Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest Dr Barbieri has received consulting fees from Dexcel Pharma and Honeydew Care for work unrelated to the current submission. Drs Lai, Golovko, and Wilkerson and authors Thang and Garate have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest Dr Barbieri has received consulting fees from Dexcel Pharma for work unrelated to the current submission. Authors Garate and Thang and Drs Lai, Golovko, and Wilkerson have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Introduction: The disposal of regulated medical waste (RMW) in the healthcare setting can be both costly and environmentally harmful. Prior studies have found large amounts of waste disposed of in RMW containers are inappropriately placed. Few studies to date have investigated the efficacy of waste reduction practices in the dermatology setting., Methods: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a practice-wide intervention in reducing RMW in the outpatient dermatology setting. By performing daily waste audits and two concurrent educational interventions, the amount of RMW produced and percent of appropriately placed RMW will be measured. Further analysis will occur by comparing pre-intervention values to post-intervention values., Results: The percentage of waste properly placed in RMW containers prior to any intervention was 11%. Following both educational interventions, the percentage of waste properly placed in RMW containers increased by 56.1% (CI 43.7-68.5%) and the percentage of total waste produced that was identified and disposed of as RMW decreased by 6.0% (95% CI 1.2-10.8%)., Conclusion: Our study provides practical data for dermatology providers to make small changes which can result in significant reductions of regulated medical waste, potentially providing benefits to the environment and cost-savings., Competing Interests: Declarations Conflict of Interest Jenny Murase is an Editorial Board member of Dermatology and Therapy. Jenny Murase was not involved in the selection of peer reviewers for the manuscript or any of the subsequent editorial decisions. Misha Rosenbach is the co-Chair of the AAD’s Expert Resource Group on Climate Change/Environmental Issues; he is speaking on behalf of himself and not the Academy. The authors have no other financial conflicts of interest that are pertinent to declare. Ethical Approval This article does not contain any new studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. This study is exempt from IRB approval and in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest Dr Barbieri reported personal fees from Dexcel Pharma for consulting outside the submitted work. Drs Lai and Zaenglein have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest John S. Barbieri has received consulting fees from Dexcel Pharma for work unrelated to the current submission. Peter R. Chai funded by NIH DP2DA056107. PRC has also received consulting fees from Syntis Bio and Teal Bio, serves on medical advisory board for Pfizer, has research grants from Gilead Sciences, eInk Corporation. PRC receives equity in Biobot Analytics.

Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest Dr Barbieri has received consulting fees from Dexcel Pharma for work unrelated to the current submission. Dr Rosmarin has consulted, spoken for, or conducted trials for the following companies: AbbVie, Abcuro, Almirall, AltruBio, Amgen, Arena, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Meyers Squibb, Celgene, Concert, CSL Behring, Dermavant, Dermira, Galderma, Incyte, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin, Lilly, Merck, Nektar, Novartis, Pfizer, RAPT, Regeneron, Recludix, Revolo Biotherapeutics, Sanofi, Sun Pharmaceuticals, UCB, VielaBio, Zura Bio. Dr Streicher has no conflicts of interest to declare.

Background: Although acne is associated with scarring, mental health comorbidities and bullying, little is known about its impact on socio-economic outcomes., Objectives: To examine the association between acne and educational, labour market and relationship outcomes., Methods: We conducted a nationwide registry-based cohort study in Denmark. We included birth cohorts from 1982 to 1988 and compared those with and without acne identified using hospital diagnosis codes and redeemed prescriptions. Our main educational outcome was educational attainment. The main labour market outcomes were earned income at age 30 and long-term unemployment at any time before age 30. The main relationship outcomes were single partnership and childlessness by age 30. Outcomes were assessed using Poisson regression for binary outcomes and linear regression for continuous outcomes, adjusted for sex, calendar year, mother's socio-economic position and hormonal contraception use., Results: Those with acne had a lower risk of not completing upper secondary education (relative risk (RR): 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76-0.83) and higher education (RR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.88-0.91), with absolute differences up to 4 percentage points. Persons with acne had slightly higher income (mean percentile difference: 2.6%, 95% CI: 2.2-2.9) and lower risk of long-term unemployment than those without acne (9.8% vs. 11.4%; RR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.87-0.93). The prevalence of being single until age 30 was similar (19.7% vs. 20.1%; adjusted RR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.94-0.98) but childlessness was slightly more prevalent (60.5% vs. 57.5%; adjusted RR: 1.03; 95% CI: 1.02-1.04). However, all associations were attenuated or lost in secondary analysis restricted to exposure-discordant siblings to address confounding from family-related factors., Conclusions: Acne during adolescence does not seem to affect long-term educational, labour market or relationship outcomes. However, there is a need for additional studies to validate the findings in untreated patients and different health and social systems., (© 2024 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.)

Importance: Masculinizing gender-affirming hormonal therapy is associated with the development of acne. While isotretinoin is a highly effective acne treatment, little is known about its effectiveness and safety among transgender and gender-diverse individuals receiving gender-affirming hormonal therapy., Objective: To evaluate clinical outcomes of isotretinoin among transgender and gender-diverse individuals receiving gender-affirming hormonal therapy., Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter retrospective case series study was conducted at 4 medical centers: Mass General Brigham, University of Pennsylvania, Emory University, and Fenway Health. It included patients aged between 12 and 49 years who were receiving masculinizing gender-affirming hormonal therapy and prescribed isotretinoin for the management of acne between August 14, 2015, and September 20, 2023., Exposure: Isotretinoin therapy for the management of acne., Main Outcomes and Measures: The percentage of patients experiencing improvement or clearance of acne, as well as rates of acne recurrence. Adverse effects and reasons for treatment discontinuation were also evaluated., Results: Among 55 included patients, the mean (SD) age was 25.4 years; 4 (7.3%) were Asian, 2 (3.6%) were Black, 4 (7.2%) were Hispanic, 1 was (1.8%) multiracial, and 36 (65.5%) were White. The median isotretinoin course duration was 6 months (IQR, 4.0-8.0), with a median cumulative dose of 132.7 mg/kg (IQR, 66.4-168.5); the cumulative dose was less than 90 mg/kg for 16 patients (29.1%) and less than 120 mg/kg for 22 patients (40.0%). Isotretinoin was associated with improvement in 48 patients (87.3%) and clearance in 26 patients (47.3%). For the 33 patients treated with a cumulative dose of 120 mg/kg or more, these rates increased to 32 patients (97.0%) and 21 patients (63.6%), respectively. Among the 20 patients who achieved acne clearance and had any subsequent health care encounters, the risk of recurrence was 20.0% (n = 4). The most frequently reported adverse effects were dryness (n = 44; 80.0%), joint pain (n = 8; 14.5%), and eczema (n = 5; 9.1%). Laboratory abnormalities were uncommon. Reasons for premature treatment discontinuation included cost, pharmacy issues, adverse effects, logistical reasons (scheduling), and wound healing concerns for gender-affirming surgery., Conclusion and Relevance: In this case series study of individuals with acne who were receiving masculinizing gender-affirming hormonal therapy and underwent isotretinoin treatment, isotretinoin was often effective and well tolerated. However, premature treatment discontinuation was common and associated with poorer outcomes. Further efforts are needed to understand optimal dosing and treatment barriers to improve outcomes in transgender and gender-diverse individuals receiving masculinizing gender-affirming hormonal therapy.

Understanding patient non-adherence to prescribed antibiotics can inform clinical practices, patient counseling, and antibiotic efficacy study design in dermatology. The primary objective was to determine the rate of and reasons for antibiotic non-adherence in the dermatologic surgery setting. The secondary objective was to test the applicability of previously studied survey questions for antibiotic non-adherence screening in the dermatologic surgery setting. Five academic outpatient dermatologic surgery centers across the United States conducted one multicenter prospective cohort study. Dermatologic surgery patients ≥ 18 years of age who were prescribed an antibiotic were included as part of this study. 15.2% (42/276) of patients did not adhere to their antibiotic regimen after dermatologic surgery. Most common reasons for incomplete antibiotic courses included forgotten antibiotics (42.9%,18/42) and side effects (28.6%, 12/42). Previously evaluated questions to identify and predict non-adherence had modest performance in the dermatologic surgery setting (Area under the curve of 0.669 [95% CI (0.583-0.754)]). Antibiotic non-adherence after skin surgery is prevalent and commonly due to reasons that physicians can address with patients., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest None disclosed.

Importance: Multiple patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for health-related quality of life (HRQL) exist for patients with psoriasis. Evidence for the content validity and other measurement properties of these PROMs is critical to determine which HRQL PROMs could be recommended for use., Objective: To systematically review the validity of HRQL-focused PROMs used in patients with psoriasis., Evidence Review: Using PubMed and Embase, full-text articles published in English or Spanish on development or validation studies for psoriasis-specific, dermatology-specific, or generic HRQL PROMs were included. Development studies included original development studies, even if not studied in psoriasis patients per Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) recommendations. If a study included multiple diagnoses, more than 50% of patients had to have psoriasis or psoriasis-specific subgroup analyses available. Data extraction and analysis followed the COSMIN guidelines. Two independent reviewers extracted and analyzed the data, including PROM characteristics, quality of measurement properties (structural validity, internal consistency, cross-cultural validity, reliability, measurement error, criterion validity, construct validity, and responsiveness), and level of evidence. PROMs were classified into 3 levels of recommendations: (1) PROM recommended for use; (2) PROM requires further validation; and (3) PROM not recommended for use., Findings: Overall, 97 articles were identified for extraction. This included 19 psoriasis-specific, 8 skin-specific, and 6 generic PROMs. According to COSMIN standards, most measures identified received a B recommendation for use, indicating their potential but requiring further validation. Only the Rasch reduced version of the Impact of Psoriasis Questionnaire (IPSO-11 Rasch) received an A recommendation for use given that it had sufficient content validity, structural validity, and internal consistency., Conclusions and Relevance: This study identified a significant lack of information concerning the quality of HRQL measures in psoriasis. This gap in knowledge can be attributed to the fact that traditional measures were developed using validation criteria that differ from the current standards in use. Consequently, additional validation studies in accordance with contemporary standards will be useful in aiding researchers and clinicians in determining the most suitable measure for assessing HRQL in patients with psoriasis.

Background: Acne vulgaris commonly affects adults, adolescents, and preadolescents aged 9 years or older., Objective: The objective of this study was to provide evidence-based recommendations for the management of acne., Methods: A work group conducted a systematic review and applied the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach for assessing the certainty of evidence and formulating and grading recommendations., Results: This guideline presents 18 evidence-based recommendations and 5 good practice statements. Strong recommendations are made for benzoyl peroxide, topical retinoids, topical antibiotics, and oral doxycycline. Oral isotretinoin is strongly recommended for acne that is severe, causing psychosocial burden or scarring, or failing standard oral or topical therapy. Conditional recommendations are made for topical clascoterone, salicylic acid, and azelaic acid, as well as for oral minocycline, sarecycline, combined oral contraceptive pills, and spironolactone. Combining topical therapies with multiple mechanisms of action, limiting systemic antibiotic use, combining systemic antibiotics with topical therapies, and adding intralesional corticosteroid injections for larger acne lesions are recommended as good practice statements., Limitations: Analysis is based on the best available evidence at the time of the systematic review., Conclusions: These guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations for the management of acne vulgaris., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest Rachel V.S. Reynolds, MD, Carol E. Cheng, MD, Kelly Druby, Megha M. Tollefson, MD, and Jung Min Han, PharmD, MS, have no relationships to disclose. Howa Yeung, MD, MS, serves as an investigator for American Acne & Rosacea Society, Department of Veterans Affairs, and National Institutes of Health receiving grants and research funding; as an independent contractor for American Academy of Dermatology and Journal of the American Medical Association receiving fees; as a speaker/faculty educator for Dermatology Digest receiving honoraria. Fran Cook-Bolden, MD, serves as an advisory board member for AbbVie, Dermavant Sciences, Inc., Galderma Global, Novartis, Ortho Dermatologics, and Pfizer Inc. receiving honoraria; as an investigator for Arcutis Biotherapeutics receiving grant and research funding; as a speaker for Galderma Laboratories, LP, Journey Medical Corporation, and Ortho Dermatologics receiving honoraria; as others for Topix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. receiving other financial benefit. Seemal R. Desai, MD, serves an advisory board member for Foundation for Research & Education of Dermatology receiving fees; as a consultant for AbbVie, Allergan, Inc, Almirall, Amgen, Apogee, Avita, Ballature Beauty, Beiersdorf, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb, Candela Corporation, Cassiopea S.p.A., Castle Biosciences, Cutera, Inc., Dermavant Sciences, Dermira, Eli Lilly and Company, EPI Health, Ferndale Laboratories, Inc., Foamix, Galderma Laboratories, LP, Gore Range Capital, Hyphens Pharma, Incyte Corporation, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Johnson and Johnson, Leo Pharma Inc., L'Oreal USA Inc., Lyceum Health, Ortho Dermatologics, Pfizer Inc., Revision Skincare, Sanofi/Regeneron, Scientis, Skin Science Advisors, UCB, Verrica Pharmaceuticals Inc., and VYNE Therapeutics receiving fees, honoraria, and/or stock options; as an investigator for AOBiome, LLC, Atacama Therapeutics, Dermavant Sciences, Incyte Corporation, and SkinMedica, Inc. receiving grants and research funding; as a speaker for AbbVie, Dermira, Galderma Laboratories, LP., and Pfizer Inc. receiving fees; as a stockholder for Gore Range Capital; as other role for Medscape receiving fees. Esther E. Freeman, MD, PhD, serves as an investigator for International League of Dermatologic Societies and National Institutes of Health receiving grants and research funding; as an author for UptoDate, Inc. and British Journal of Dermatology, receiving honoraria or salary; as a speaker for Harvard University. Jonette E. Keri, MD, PhD, serves as an advisory board member for Ortho Dermatologics receiving honoraria; as a consultant for Almirall receiving fees; as an investigator for Galderma USA receiving grants and research funding; as a speaker for Foamix Pharmaceuticals Ltd and VYNE Therapeutics receiving honoraria. Linda F. Stein Gold, MD, serves as an advisory board member for AbbVie, Almirall, Aqua, Dermavant Sciences, Foamix, Galderma Laboratories, L.P., GlaxoSmithKline, Incyte Corporation, La Roche-Posay Laboratorie Pharmaceutique, LEO Pharma, US, Lilly ICOS LLC, Merz Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Pfizer Inc., Promius Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi/Regeneron, Taro Pharm, and Valeant Pharmaceuticals International receiving honoraria; as a consultant for AnaptysBio, BMS, Botanix Pharmaceuticals, Cutera, Inc., Incyte Corporation, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Sol-Gel Technologies, Taro Pharm, The Acne Store, and UCB receiving honoraria or grants and research funding; as an investigator for AbbVie, Allergan, Inc., AnaptysBio, Galderma Laboratories, L.P., Leo Pharma Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., Pfizer Inc., Topica, and Valeant Pharmaceuticals International receiving grants and research funding; as a speaker for Actavis, Almirall, BMS, Dermira, Pfizer Inc., Sanofi/Regeneron, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., and VYNE Therapeutics receiving honoraria. Jerry K. L. Tan, MD, serves as an advisory board member for Abbott Laboratories, Cutera, Inc., Galderma Laboratories, L.P, and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd receiving honoraria or grants and research funding; as a consultant for Bausch Health, Boots, Galderma Research & Development, LLC, and Loreal Research and Innovation receiving honoraria; as an independent contractor for Norvatis receiving fees; as an investigator for Allergan, AnaptysBio, Cutera, Inc., Eli Lilly and Co., Galderma Laboratories, L.P, Lilly ICOS LLC, Pfizer, and UCB for receiving grants and research funding; as a speaker for Bausch Health, LEO Laboratories Ltd (LEO Pharma), and Vichy Laboratories receiving honoraria. Jonathan S. Weiss, MD, serves as an advisory board member for Bristol-Myers Squibb, Dermavant Sciences, Foamix, Galderma Laboratories, L.P., Incyte Corporation, Novartis, and UCB receiving honoraria; as a consultant for Arcutis, Inc., Biofrontera, Cutera, Inc., Leo Pharma Inc, Ortho Dermatologics, and UCB receiving fees or honoraria; as an investigator for AbbVie, Bausch Health, Biofrontera, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cutera, Inc., Dermavant Sciences, Foamix, Galderma Laboratories, L.P., LEO Pharma, Mindera, Moberg Pharma North, America LLC, Novartis, Palvella Therapeutics, and Verrica Pharmaceuticals Inc receiving grants and research funding; as a speaker for AbbVie, Arcutis, Inc., Galderma Laboratories, L.P., Ortho Dermatologics, Regeneron, and Sanofi Genzyme receiving honoraria. Peggy A. Wu, MD, serves as others for UptoDate, Inc. receiving honoraria. Andrea L. Zaenglein, MD, serves as a consultant for Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and UCB receiving fees or honoraria; as an investigator for AbbVie, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Biofrontera AG, Galderma Laboratories, L.P., and Incyte Corporation receiving grants and research funding. John S. Barbieri, MD, MBA serves as investigator for National Institutes of Health and National Psoriasis Foundation receiving grants and research funding., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Patients with autoimmune bullous diseases are at an increased risk of infection, both from the underlying skin disease and from immunosuppressive treatments. Limited information is available on vaccine beliefs and behaviors in dermatology patients and adults with autoimmune bullous diseases in particular. To understand vaccine decision making, identify perceived risks and benefits of vaccinations, and discuss individual experiences in patients with autoimmune bullous diseases in the United States. A qualitative study was performed utilizing semi-structured interviews, and analysis was conducted on NVivo. Patterns were identified in the coded data, and representative quotations were recorded for each major theme. Interviews were conducted between February 15, 2022 and September 15, 2022. Twenty patients with a diagnosis of bullous pemphigoid, mucous membrane pemphigoid, pemphigus vulgaris, or pemphigus foliaceous were interviewed. Of the 20 participants, 14 (70%) were female, with a mean (SD, range) age of 64.8 (13.2, 34-83) years. Key themes that emerged from qualitative analysis of the interviews included patient concerns regarding their increased susceptibility to infection, potential exacerbation of skin disease following vaccination, and the effect of immunosuppressive medications on humoral response to vaccines. Lack of appointment availability, difficulty accessing vaccines, and cost were commonly identified barriers to vaccination. These findings provide valuable knowledge for dermatologists in regard to providing counseling specific to patient concerns and to improve communication surrounding vaccination in the dermatology setting., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest Dr Barbieri has received consulting fees from Dexcel Pharma for work unrelated to the current submission. Authors Garate and Thang and Drs Damsky, Rosenabach, Golovko, and Wilkerson have no other conflicts to declare.

Importance: The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) potentially holds promise as an opportunity to improve outcomes and quality of care for patients with skin disease, but the routine use of PROMs remains limited. While the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) has several strengths and domains relevant to those with chronic skin disease, it is not clear which are most useful., Objective: To determine which PROMIS domains are most meaningful to those with chronic skin disease to develop a PROMIS profile that effectively captures the experience of living with these skin diseases., Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study was based on data gathered from an internet survey that was administered to a sample of adult respondents in the US on the Prolific Platform and ResearchMatch and through the National Psoriasis Foundation. A list of PROMIS domains relevant to chronic skin disease was developed through literature review. These domains were included in a best-worst scaling exercise, in which participants were shown 12 sets of 4 domains and asked to choose which domain in each set was the most important and least important to their experience. Participants completed the survey between December 2022 and June 2023. Data were analyzed in June 2023., Main Outcomes and Measures: Ratio-scaled preference score for each of the domains., Results: Of 939 total participants, 559 (59.5%) were female, 20 (2.1%) gender nonconforming, 7 (0.7%) transgender men, and 1 (0.1%) transgender women; there were 4 American Indian/Alaska Native (0.4%), 50 Asian (5.3%), 63 Black (6.7%), 66 Hispanic or Latino/a/x (7.0%), 2 Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (0.2%), 749 White (79.8%), and 42 multiracial individuals (4.5%). The survey was completed by 200 participants with acne, 316 with psoriasis, 199 with atopic dermatitis, and 224 with various chronic skin diseases. For those with acne, the highest-scored domains were body image (15.66), appearance (14.96), life satisfaction (11.29), depression (9.25), and anxiety (9.18). For those with psoriasis, the highest-scored domains were life satisfaction (11.31), appearance (11.05), itch (10.98), pain (9.97), and body image (8.75). For those with atopic dermatitis, the highest-scored domains were itch (12.60), life satisfaction (11.65), appearance (11.40), body image (11.25), and pain (10.03)., Conclusion and Relevance: The results of this study suggest that body image, appearance, life satisfaction, itch, pain, anxiety, and depression were highly rated across the surveys. By identifying the PROMIS domains most important to individuals with chronic skin disease, clinicians can choose the domains that are most relevant to patients. In addition, this may guide the construction of a PROMIS profile that effectively captures the experience of living with these skin diseases and can serve as a patient-reported measure of disease severity and treatment effectiveness.

Dermatologic diseases have a well-documented association with depression and anxiety, which are in turn often comorbid with alcohol use disorder (AUD). Nonethleess, the relationship between dermatologic disease and AUD, and the relative contribution of depression and anxiety, are poorly understood. Here, we utilize the National Insittutes of Health All of Us Research Program to investigate the association between inflammatory and pigmentary dermatologic diseases with AUD. Furthermore, we investigate whether comorbid depression and anxiety mediates this relationship. We employed a matched case-control model with multivariable logistic regression. We also employed a mediation analysis. We found an increased odds of AUD among patients with atopic dermatitis, acne/rosacea, hidradenitis suppurativa, psoriasis, and pigmentary disorders (vitiligo, melasma, and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation). This was partially mediated by anxiety and depression, especially for diseases with a significant cosmetic component. Overall, these findings highlight the profound psychological and physical health effects that inflammatory and pigmentary disease can have on patients, both independently and in combination with comorbid psychiatric disease., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Importance: Treatment satisfaction is important to achieving therapeutic success in patients with inflammatory dermatological diseases, such as acne., Objective: To evaluate the structural validity, internal consistency, and construct validity of the DermSat-7, a questionnaire-based measure of treatment satisfaction, in patients with acne seen in routine clinical practice., Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study included adults with acne who were fluent in English and treated at an outpatient clinic at Brigham and Women's Hospital between July 2022 and May 2023. At each visit, patients completed a self-administered, patient-reported outcome questionnaire, including a patient global assessment (PGA) of their acne severity and the DermSat-7. The DermSat-7 consists of 7 items assessing 3 domains of treatment: effectiveness (3 items), convenience (3 items), and overall satisfaction (1 item). At subsequent visits, patients were asked an anchor item related to change in disease severity ("How has your acne changed compared to your last visit?") that was scored on a 7-point scale (-3 = much worse to 3 = much better). Also at each visit, a dermatologist completed the Comprehensive Acne Severity Scale (CASS)., Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were structural validity (assessed by factor analysis), internal consistency (assessed by Cronbach α), and construct validity (assessed using linear regression models and Pearson correlation coefficients)., Results: The analysis included 142 patients with acne (mean [SD] age, 25.1 [5.1] years; 96 females [67.6%]) taking acne medication who completed the DermSat-7. Exploratory factor and confirmatory factor analysis supported the unidimensionality of the 3 DermSat-7 domains. Cronbach α values of 0.89 and 0.80 supported good internal consistency in the effectiveness and convenience domains, respectively. Known-groups validity was supported by increasing DermSat-7 effectiveness and overall satisfaction scores with increasing levels of positive change in disease severity (linear regression coefficient, 7.51; 95% CI, 4.94-10.08; P < .001). Construct validity was further supported by moderate correlations with the anchor, PGA, and CASS scores (effectiveness domain: anchor r = 0.567, PGA r = -0.538, and CASS r = -0.485; overall satisfaction domain: anchor r = 0.467, PGA r = -0.486, and CASS r = -0.489)., Conclusion and Relevance: This cross-sectional study found that the DermSat-7 may be an effective tool for measuring treatment satisfaction, particularly effectiveness and overall satisfaction domains, among patients with acne. Further research is needed to examine additional measurement properties of the DermSat-7, such as content validity and interpretability, as well as to validate the DermSat-7 in other populations of patients with acne.