1. Reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the IDEAL Schedule for assessing care needs in dementia: Cross-sectional, multicenter study
- Author
-
López-Antón R, Barrada JR, Santabárbara J, Posadas-de Miguel M, Agüera L, Burillo C, Franco M, López-Álvarez J, Mesa P, Petidier R, Quintanilla MÁ, Robles B, Ventura T, Semrau M, Sartorius N, Lobo A, and And the members of the IDEAL Spanish Working Group
- Subjects
psychometrics ,dementia ,validation study ,assessment of health care needs ,factor analysis - Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The IDEAL Schedule was developed for staging "care needs" in patients with dementia. We here aim to validate the Spanish version, further test its psychometric properties and explore a latent construct for "care needs". METHODS: A multicenter study was done in 8 dementia care facilities across Spain. Patients referred with a reliable ICD-10 diagnosis of dementia (n = 151) were assessed with the IDEAL Schedule by pairs of raters. Inter-rater reliability (intra-class correlation [ICC] coefficients), internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), and factor analysis were calculated. Convergent validity for individual items was tested against validated Spanish versions of international instruments. RESULTS: Pilot testing with numerical scales supported the feasibility, face, and content validity of the schedule. The psychometric coefficients were good/clinically acceptable: inter-rater reliability (mean ICC = 0.861; 85% of the ICCs > 0.8), internal consistency (global alpha coefficient = 0.74 in 5 nuclear items), and concurrent validity (global score against the Clinical Dementia Rating schedule, r = 0.63; coefficients for individual items ranging from 0.40 to 0.84, all statistically significant, p
- Published
- 2018