Search

Tylosin (TYL) is a macrolide antibiotic widely used in animal husbandry. Due to associated health risks, there is a demand for sensitive methods for mass screening of TYL in products of animal origin. This article describes the development of lateral flow immunoassays (LFIAs) for TYL detection using direct (anti-TYL antibodies conjugated with nanoparticles) and indirect antibody labeling (anti-species antibodies conjugated with nanoparticles and combined with native anti-TYL antibodies). The choice of LFIA conditions, such as concentrations of hapten–protein conjugates, specific antibodies, and gold nanoparticle (GNP) conjugates with antibodies, as well as incubation time of reagents and the concentration of detergent in the sample buffer, is presented. The achieved limits of TYL detection using LFIAs with indirect labeling were 0.8 ng/mL (visual) and 0.07 ng/mL (instrumental), compared to 4 ng/mL (visual) and 0.4 ng/mL (instrumental) for the case of direct labeling. The sensitivity of the LFIA using the indirect format was up to seven times higher, allowing the determination of the target analyte at low concentrations. TYL detection in ground meat using LFIA with indirect antibody labeling ranged from 76–119%. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A new scheme of reagents interaction for lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) is proposed, which combines the features of competitive and sandwich assay and provides highly sensitive detection of low-molecular-weight analytes. Namely, the antigen in the sample interferes with the formation of the antibody (on the membrane)–hapten-protein–antibody (on the nanoparticle-marker) complex, competing with hapten-protein conjugate in both reactions. The proposed scheme was modelled using COPASI software, with a prediction of limit of detection (LOD) decrease by one order of magnitude compared to the standard competitive LFIA. This feature was experimentally confirmed for the detection of chloramphenicol (CAP) in honey. When tested in spiked honey, the visual LOD was 50 ng/mL for the common scheme and 5 ng/mL for the proposed scheme. Instrumental LOD was 300 pg/mL (1.2 µg/kg in conversion per sample weight of honey) in the standard scheme and 20 pg/mL (80 ng/kg in conversion per sample weight of honey) in the proposed scheme. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]