Search

Your search keyword '"Batalden, Paul B."' showing total 234 results
Start Over Author "Batalden, Paul B."
234 results on '"Batalden, Paul B."'

1. Using Early Clinical Experiences To Integrate Quality-Improvement Learning into Medical Education.

Author

Weeks, William B., Robinson, Jamie L., Brooks, W. Blair, and Batalden, Paul B.

Abstract

Describes a two-pronged program at Dartmouth Medical School (New Hampshire) for teaching quality improvement to medical students: one component requires all students to participate in an improvement project at their community-based physician preceptor sites; the other component, an elective, has students develop an improvement plan for the preceptor site, implement it, and write up their experiences. (Author/DB)

Published
2000

14. COproduction VALUE creation in healthcare service (CO-VALUE): an international multicentre protocol to describe the application of a model of value creation for use in systems of coproduced healthcare services and to evaluate the initial feasibility, utility and acceptability of associated system-level value creation assessment approaches

Author

Oliver, Brant J, primary, Batalden, Paul B, additional, DiMilia, Peter Rocco, additional, Forcino, Rachel C, additional, Foster, Tina C, additional, Nelson, Eugene C, additional, and Garre, Boel Anderson, additional

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

19. Networked health care: Rethinking value creation in learning health care systems

Author

Fjeldstad, Øystein D., Johnson, Julie K., Margolis, Peter A., Seid, Michael, Höglund, Pär, and Batalden, Paul B.

Abstract

Creating better value in health care service today is very challenging. The social pressure to do so is real for every health care system and its leadership. Real benefit has been achieved in manufacturing sector work by the use of “value‐chain” thinking, which assumes that the work is a series of linked processes necessary to make a product. For those activities in health care systems that are similar, this model may be very helpful. Attempts to “install” the value chain widely in health care systems have, however, been frustrating. As a result, well‐meaning leaders seeking better value have resorted to programs of cost reduction, rather than service redesign. Professionals have not been very happy or willing participants. The work of health care service invites an expanded model of value creation, one that better matches the work. This paper proposes a networked architecture that can mobilize and integrate the resources of health care professionals, interested patients, family, and other community members in the delivery and improvement of health care systems. It also suggests how this value‐creation architecture might contribute to research and the development of new knowledge. Two cases illustrate the proposed architecture and its implications for system design and practice, technology development, and roles and responsibilities of all actors involved in health care systems. We believe that this model better fits the need of making and improving health care services. This expanded understanding of how value is created invites attention by senior leaders, by those attempting to facilitate the improvement of current systems, by patients and clinicians involved in the daily work of health care service coproduction, by those charged with the preparation and formation of future professionals, by those who measure and conduct research in health care services, and by those leading policy, payment, and reimbursement systems.

Published
2019

23. Quality improvement learning collaboratives

Author

Ayers, Lea R., Beyea, Suzanne C., Godfrey, Marjorie M., Harper, Doreen C., Nelson, Eugene C., and Batalden, Paul B.

Subjects
Health care industry -- Quality management, Health care industry -- Research, Medical research -- Models, Medicine, Experimental -- Models, Health care industry, Business
Published
2005

39. Interprofessional working and continuing medical education

Author

Headrick, Linda A., Wilcock, Peter M., and Batalden, Paul B.

Subjects
Medicine -- Specialties and specialists, Medical education -- Social aspects -- Analysis, Continuing medical education -- Analysis -- Social aspects, Health, Social aspects, Analysis
Abstract

The increased focus on the results of professional practice (that is, the health outcomes of individuals and populations) creates two related tensions which will be considered in this paper. The [...]

Published
1998

44. Patient focused registries can improve health, care, and science

Author

Nelson, Eugene C, Dixon-Woods, Mary, Batalden, Paul B, Homa, Karen, Van Citters, Aricca D, Morgan, Tamara S, Eftimovska, Elena, Fisher, Elliott S, Ovretveit, John, Harrison, Wade, Lind, Cristin, Lindblad, Staffan, Dixon-Woods, Mary [0000-0002-5915-0041], and Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository

Subjects
Hälso- och sjukvårdsorganisation, hälsopolitik och hälsoekonomi, Clinical Audit, Models, Statistical, endocrine system diseases, Data Collection, fungi, education, digestive, oral, and skin physiology, food and beverages, Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy, Quality Improvement, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Patient-Centered Care, Humans, Registries, Delivery of Health Care, health care economics and organizations, Analysis, Quality Indicators, Health Care
Abstract

Large scale collection and analysis of data on patients’ experiences and outcomes have become staples of successful health systems worldwide. The systems go by various names—including registries, quality registries, clinical databases, clinical audits, and quality improvement programmes—but all collect standardised information on patients’ diagnoses, care processes, and outcomes, enabling systematic comparison and analysis across multiple sites. Hundreds of what we will term, for simplicity, “registries,” now exist around the world. The United Kingdom is home to over 50 clinical audit programmes, the United States has over 110 federally qualified registries certified to report quality metrics, and Sweden, perhaps the registry epicentre, has over 100, covering conditions from birth to frail old age. These registries have had far reaching effects. They facilitate public reporting, retrospective and prospective research, professional development, and service improvement. They reveal variations in practices, processes, and outcomes, and identify targets for improvement. In the UK, they have been associated with many notable successes, including improvements in management of cardiovascular disease and stroke, cancer, and joint replacement.

Published
2016

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results