103 results on '"Bauer, S. E."'
Search Results
2. Evaluation of Observed and Modelled Aerosol Lifetimes Using Radioactive Tracers of Opportunity and an Ensemble of 19 Global Models
- Author
-
Kristiansen, N. I, Stohl, A, Olivie, D. J. L, Croft, B, Sovde, O. A, Klein, H, Christoudias, T, Kunkel, D, Leadbetter, S. J, Lee, Y. H, Zhang, K, Tsigaridis, K, Bauer, S. E, Faluvegi, G. S, and Shindell, D
- Subjects
Meteorology And Climatology - Abstract
Aerosols have important impacts on air quality and climate, but the processes affecting their removal from the atmosphere are not fully understood and are poorly constrained by observations. This makes modelled aerosol lifetimes uncertain. In this study, we make use of an observational constraint on aerosol lifetimes provided by radionuclide measurements and investigate the causes of differences within a set of global models. During the Fukushima Dai-Ichi nuclear power plant accident of March 2011, the radioactive isotopes cesium-137 (Cs-137) and xenon-133 (Xe-133) were released in large quantities. Cesium attached to particles in the ambient air, approximately according to their available aerosol surface area. Cs-137 size distribution measurements taken close to the power plant suggested that accumulation mode (AM) sulfate aerosols were the main carriers of cesium. Hence, Cs-137 can be used as a proxy tracer for the AM sulfate aerosol's fate in the atmosphere. In contrast, the noble gas Xe-133 behaves almost like a passive transport tracer. Global surface measurements of the two radioactive isotopes taken over several months after the release allow the derivation of a lifetime of the carrier aerosol. We compare this to the lifetimes simulated by 19 different atmospheric transport models initialized with identical emissions of Cs-137that were assigned to an aerosol tracer with each model's default properties of AM sulfate, and Xe-133 emissions that were assigned to a passive tracer. We investigate to what extent the modelled sulfate tracer can reproduce the measurements, especially with respect to the observed loss of aerosol mass with time. Modelled Cs-137and Xe-133 concentrations sampled at the same location and times as station measurements allow a direct comparison between measured and modelled aerosol lifetime. The e-folding lifetime e, calculated from station measurement data taken between 2 and 9 weeks after the start of the emissions, is 14.3 days (95% confidence interval 13.1-15.7 days). The equivalent modelled e lifetimes have a large spread, varying between 4.8 and 26.7 days with a model median of 9.42.3 days, indicating too fast a removal in most models. Because sufficient measurement data were only available from about 2 weeks after the release, the estimated lifetimes apply to aerosols that have undergone long-range transport, i.e. not for freshly emitted aerosol. However, modelled instantaneous lifetimes show that the initial removal in the first 2 weeks was quicker (lifetimes between 1 and 5 days) due to the emissions occurring at low altitudes and co-location of the fresh plume with strong precipitation. Deviations between measured and modelled aerosol lifetimes are largest for the northernmost stations and at later time periods, suggesting that models do not transport enough of the aerosol towards the Arctic. The models underestimate passive tracer (Xe-133) concentrations in the Arctic as well but to a smaller extent than for the aerosol (Cs-137) tracer. This indicates that in addition to too fast an aerosol removal in the models, errors in simulated atmospheric transport towards the Arctic in most models also contribute to the underestimation of the Arctic aerosol concentrations.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Intercomparison and Evaluation of Global Aerosol Microphysical Properties Among Aerocom Models of a Range of Complexity
- Author
-
Mann, G. W, Carslaw, K. S, Reddington, C. L, Pringle, K. J, Schulz, M, Asmi, A, Spracklen, D. V, Ridley, D. A, Woodhouse, M. T, Lee, L. A, Zhang, K, Ghan, S. J, Easter, R. C, Liu, X, Stier, P, Lee, Y. H, Adams, P. J, Tost, H, Lelieveld, J, Bauer, S. E, Tsigaridis, K, van Noije, T. P. C, Strunk, A, Vignati, E, and Bellouin, N
- Subjects
Geophysics ,Meteorology And Climatology - Abstract
Many of the next generation of global climate models will include aerosol schemes which explicitly simulate the microphysical processes that determine the particle size distribution. These models enable aerosol optical properties and cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentrations to be determined by fundamental aerosol processes, which should lead to a more physically based simulation of aerosol direct and indirect radiative forcings. This study examines the global variation in particle size distribution simulated by 12 global aerosol microphysics models to quantify model diversity and to identify any common biases against observations. Evaluation against size distribution measurements from a new European network of aerosol supersites shows that the mean model agrees quite well with the observations at many sites on the annual mean, but there are some seasonal biases common to many sites. In particular, at many of these European sites, the accumulation mode number concentration is biased low during winter and Aitken mode concentrations tend to be overestimated in winter and underestimated in summer. At high northern latitudes, the models strongly underpredict Aitken and accumulation particle concentrations compared to the measurements, consistent with previous studies that have highlighted the poor performance of global aerosol models in the Arctic. In the marine boundary layer, the models capture the observed meridional variation in the size distribution, which is dominated by the Aitken mode at high latitudes, with an increasing concentration of accumulation particles with decreasing latitude. Considering vertical profiles, the models reproduce the observed peak in total particle concentrations in the upper troposphere due to new particle formation, although modelled peak concentrations tend to be biased high over Europe. Overall, the multimodel- mean data set simulates the global variation of the particle size distribution with a good degree of skill, suggesting that most of the individual global aerosol microphysics models are performing well, although the large model diversity indicates that some models are in poor agreement with the observations. Further work is required to better constrain size-resolved primary and secondary particle number sources, and an improved understanding of nucleation an growth (e.g. the role of nitrate and secondary organics) will improve the fidelity of simulated particle size distributions.
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Climate model projections from the Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) of CMIP6
- Author
-
Tebaldi, C., Debeire, K., Eyring, V., Fischer, E., Fyfe, J., Friedlingstein, P., Knutti, R., Lowe, J., O'Neill, B., Sanderson, B., van Vuuren, D., Riahi, K., Meinshausen, M., Nicholls, Z., Tokarska, K. B., Hurtt, G., Kriegler, E., Lamarque, J.-F., Meehl, G., Moss, R., Bauer, S. E., Boucher, O., Brovkin, V., Byun, Y.-H., Dix, M., Gualdi, S., Guo, H., John, J. G., Kharin, S., Kim, Y., Koshiro, T., Ma, L., Olivié, D., Panickal, S., Qiao, F., Rong, X., Rosenbloom, N., Schupfner, M., Séférian, R., Sellar, A., Semmler, T., Shi, X., Song, Z., Steger, C., Stouffer, R., Swart, N., Tachiiri, K., Tang, Q., Tatebe, H., Voldoire, A., Volodin, E., Wyser, K., Xin, X., Yang, S., Yu, Y., Ziehn, T., Tebaldi, C., Debeire, K., Eyring, V., Fischer, E., Fyfe, J., Friedlingstein, P., Knutti, R., Lowe, J., O'Neill, B., Sanderson, B., van Vuuren, D., Riahi, K., Meinshausen, M., Nicholls, Z., Tokarska, K. B., Hurtt, G., Kriegler, E., Lamarque, J.-F., Meehl, G., Moss, R., Bauer, S. E., Boucher, O., Brovkin, V., Byun, Y.-H., Dix, M., Gualdi, S., Guo, H., John, J. G., Kharin, S., Kim, Y., Koshiro, T., Ma, L., Olivié, D., Panickal, S., Qiao, F., Rong, X., Rosenbloom, N., Schupfner, M., Séférian, R., Sellar, A., Semmler, T., Shi, X., Song, Z., Steger, C., Stouffer, R., Swart, N., Tachiiri, K., Tang, Q., Tatebe, H., Voldoire, A., Volodin, E., Wyser, K., Xin, X., Yang, S., Yu, Y., and Ziehn, T.
- Abstract
The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) defines and coordinates the main set of future climate projections, based on concentration-driven simulations, within the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 6 (CMIP6). This paper presents a range of its outcomes by synthesizing results from the participating global coupled Earth system models. We limit our scope to the analysis of strictly geophysical outcomes: mainly global averages and spatial patterns of change for surface air temperature and precipitation. We also compare CMIP6 projections to CMIP5 results, especially for those scenarios that were designed to provide continuity across the CMIP phases, at the same time highlighting important differences in forcing composition, as well as in results. The range of future temperature and precipitation changes by the end of the century (2081–2100) encompassing the Tier 1 experiments based on the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP) scenarios (SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, SSP3-7.0 and SSP5-8.5) and SSP1-1.9 spans a larger range of outcomes compared to CMIP5, due to higher warming (by close to 1.5 ∘C) reached at the upper end of the 5 %–95 % envelope of the highest scenario (SSP5-8.5). This is due to both the wider range of radiative forcing that the new scenarios cover and the higher climate sensitivities in some of the new models compared to their CMIP5 predecessors. Spatial patterns of change for temperature and precipitation averaged over models and scenarios have familiar features, and an analysis of their variations confirms model structural differences to be the dominant source of uncertainty. Models also differ with respect to the size and evolution of internal variability as measured by individual models' initial condition ensemble spreads, according to a set of initial condition ensemble simulations available under SSP3-7.0. These experiments suggest a tendency for internal variability to decrease along the course of the century in this scenario, a result
- Published
- 2021
5. An AeroCom Assessment of Black Carbon in Arctic Snow and Sea Ice
- Author
-
Jiao, C, Flanner, M. G, Balkanski, Y, Bauer, S. E, Bellouin, N, Bernsten, T. K, Bian, H, Carslaw, K. S, Chin, M, DeLuca, N, Diehl, T, Ghan, S. J, Iversen, T, Kirkevag, A, Koch, D, Liu, X, Mann, G. W, Penner, J. E, Pitari, G, Schulz, M, Seland, O, Skeie, R. B, Steenrod, S. D, Stier, P, and Tkemura, T
- Subjects
Meteorology And Climatology - Abstract
Though many global aerosols models prognose surface deposition, only a few models have been used to directly simulate the radiative effect from black carbon (BC) deposition to snow and sea ice. Here, we apply aerosol deposition fields from 25 models contributing to two phases of the Aerosol Comparisons between Observations and Models (AeroCom) project to simulate and evaluate within-snow BC concentrations and radiative effect in the Arctic. We accomplish this by driving the offline land and sea ice components of the Community Earth System Model with different deposition fields and meteorological conditions from 2004 to 2009, during which an extensive field campaign of BC measurements in Arctic snow occurred. We find that models generally underestimate BC concentrations in snow in northern Russia and Norway, while overestimating BC amounts elsewhere in the Arctic. Although simulated BC distributions in snow are poorly correlated with measurements, mean values are reasonable. The multi-model mean (range) bias in BC concentrations, sampled over the same grid cells, snow depths, and months of measurements, are −4.4 (−13.2 to +10.7) ng/g for an earlier phase of AeroCom models (phase I), and +4.1 (−13.0 to +21.4) ng/g for a more recent phase of AeroCom models (phase II), compared to the observational mean of 19.2 ng/g. Factors determining model BC concentrations in Arctic snow include Arctic BC emissions, transport of extra-Arctic aerosols, precipitation, deposition efficiency of aerosols within the Arctic, and meltwater removal of particles in snow. Sensitivity studies show that the model-measurement evaluation is only weakly affected by meltwater scavenging efficiency because most measurements were conducted in non-melting snow. The Arctic (60-90degN) atmospheric residence time for BC in phase II models ranges from 3.7 to 23.2 days, implying large inter-model variation in local BC deposition efficiency. Combined with the fact that most Arctic BC deposition originates from extra-Arctic emissions, these results suggest that aerosol removal processes are a leading source of variation in model performance. The multi-model mean (full range) of Arctic radiative effect from BC in snow is 0.15 (0.07-0.25) W/sq m and 0.18 (0.06-0.28) W/sq m in phase I and phase II models, respectively. After correcting for model biases relative to observed BC concentrations in different regions of the Arctic, we obtain a multi-model mean Arctic radiative effect of 0.17 W/sq m for the combined AeroCom ensembles. Finally, there is a high correlation between modeled BC concentrations sampled over the observational sites and the Arctic as a whole, indicating that the field campaign provided a reasonable sample of the Arctic.
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Evaluation of Aerosol-cloud Interaction in the GISS Model E Using ARM Observations
- Author
-
DeBoer, G, Bauer, S. E, Toto, T, Menon, Surabi, and Vogelmann, A. M
- Subjects
Meteorology And Climatology - Abstract
Observations from the US Department of Energy's Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) program are used to evaluate the ability of the NASA GISS ModelE global climate model in reproducing observed interactions between aerosols and clouds. Included in the evaluation are comparisons of basic meteorology and aerosol properties, droplet activation, effective radius parameterizations, and surface-based evaluations of aerosol-cloud interactions (ACI). Differences between the simulated and observed ACI are generally large, but these differences may result partially from vertical distribution of aerosol in the model, rather than the representation of physical processes governing the interactions between aerosols and clouds. Compared to the current observations, the ModelE often features elevated droplet concentrations for a given aerosol concentration, indicating that the activation parameterizations used may be too aggressive. Additionally, parameterizations for effective radius commonly used in models were tested using ARM observations, and there was no clear superior parameterization for the cases reviewed here. This lack of consensus is demonstrated to result in potentially large, statistically significant differences to surface radiative budgets, should one parameterization be chosen over another.
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Black Carbon and Precipitation: An Energetics Perspective
- Author
-
Sand, M., primary, Samset, B. H., additional, Tsigaridis, K., additional, Bauer, S. E., additional, and Myhre, G., additional
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Final Response to all three reviews.
- Author
-
Bauer, S. E., primary
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Authors reply to all three reviews
- Author
-
Bauer, S. E., primary
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Storm tracks in a warmer climate: sensitivity studies with a simplified global circulation model
- Author
-
Lunkeit, F., Fraedrich, K., and Bauer, S. E.
- Published
- 1998
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. A Global Modeling Study on Carbonaceous Aerosol Microphysical Characteristics and Radiative Effects
- Author
-
Bauer, S. E, Menon, S, Koch, D, Bond, T. C, and Tsigaridis, K
- Subjects
Meteorology And Climatology - Abstract
Recently, attention has been drawn towards black carbon aerosols as a short-term climate warming mitigation candidate. However the global and regional impacts of the direct, indirect and semi-direct aerosol effects are highly uncertain, due to the complex nature of aerosol evolution and the way that mixed, aged aerosols interact with clouds and radiation. A detailed aerosol microphysical scheme, MATRIX, embedded within the GISS climate model is used in this study to present a quantitative assessment of the impact of microphysical processes involving black carbon, such as emission size distributions and optical properties on aerosol cloud activation and radiative effects. Our best estimate for net direct and indirect aerosol radiative flux change between 1750 and 2000 is -0.56 W/m2. However, the direct and indirect aerosol effects are quite sensitive to the black and organic carbon size distribution and consequential mixing state. The net radiative flux change can vary between -0.32 to -0.75 W/m2 depending on these carbonaceous particle properties at emission. Taking into account internally mixed black carbon particles let us simulate correct aerosol absorption. Absorption of black carbon aerosols is amplified by sulfate and nitrate coatings and, even more strongly, by organic coatings. Black carbon mitigation scenarios generally showed reduced radiative fluxeswhen sources with a large proportion of black carbon, such as diesel, are reduced; however reducing sources with a larger organic carbon component as well, such as bio-fuels, does not necessarily lead to a reduction in positive radiative flux.
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Climate Impacts From a Removal of Anthropogenic Aerosol Emissions
- Author
-
Samset, B. H., primary, Sand, M., additional, Smith, C. J., additional, Bauer, S. E., additional, Forster, P. M., additional, Fuglestvedt, J. S., additional, Osprey, S., additional, and Schleussner, C.‐F., additional
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Authors answer to both reviewers
- Author
-
Bauer, S. E., primary
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. What controls the vertical distribution of aerosol? Relationships between process sensitivity in HadGEM3–UKCA and inter-model variation from AeroCom Phase II
- Author
-
Kipling, Z., primary, Stier, P., additional, Johnson, C. E., additional, Mann, G. W., additional, Bellouin, N., additional, Bauer, S. E., additional, Bergman, T., additional, Chin, M., additional, Diehl, T., additional, Ghan, S. J., additional, Iversen, T., additional, Kirkevåg, A., additional, Kokkola, H., additional, Liu, X., additional, Luo, G., additional, van Noije, T., additional, Pringle, K. J., additional, von Salzen, K., additional, Schulz, M., additional, Seland, Ø., additional, Skeie, R. B., additional, Takemura, T., additional, Tsigaridis, K., additional, and Zhang, K., additional
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Supplementary material to "What controls the vertical distribution of aerosol? Relationships between process sensitivity in HadGEM3–UKCA and inter-model variation from AeroCom Phase II"
- Author
-
Kipling, Z., primary, Stier, P., additional, Johnson, C. E., additional, Mann, G. W., additional, Bellouin, N., additional, Bauer, S. E., additional, Bergman, T., additional, Chin, M., additional, Diehl, T., additional, Ghan, S. J., additional, Iversen, T., additional, Kirkevåg, A., additional, Kokkola, H., additional, Liu, X., additional, Luo, G., additional, van Noije, T., additional, Pringle, K. J., additional, von Salzen, K., additional, Schulz, M., additional, Seland, Ø., additional, Skeie, R. B., additional, Takemura, T., additional, Tsigaridis, K., additional, and Zhang, K., additional
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Evaluation of observed and modelled aerosol lifetimes using radioactive tracers of opportunity and an ensemble of 19 global models
- Author
-
Kristiansen, N. I., primary, Stohl, A., additional, Olivié, D. J. L., additional, Croft, B., additional, Søvde, O. A., additional, Klein, H., additional, Christoudias, T., additional, Kunkel, D., additional, Leadbetter, S. J., additional, Lee, Y. H., additional, Zhang, K., additional, Tsigaridis, K., additional, Bergman, T., additional, Evangeliou, N., additional, Wang, H., additional, Ma, P.-L., additional, Easter, R. C., additional, Rasch, P. J., additional, Liu, X., additional, Pitari, G., additional, Di Genova, G., additional, Zhao, S. Y., additional, Balkanski, Y., additional, Bauer, S. E., additional, Faluvegi, G. S., additional, Kokkola, H., additional, Martin, R. V., additional, Pierce, J. R., additional, Schulz, M., additional, Shindell, D., additional, Tost, H., additional, and Zhang, H., additional
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. MATRIX (Multiconfiguration Aerosol TRacker of mIXing state): an aerosol microphysical module for global atmospheric models
- Author
-
Bauer, S. E., Wright, D., Koch, D., Lewis, E. R., Mcgraw, R., Chang, L.-S., Schwartz, S. E., Ruedy, R., Earth Institute at Columbia University, Columbia University [New York], NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS), NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), School of Arts and Sciences, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey [New Brunswick] (RU), Rutgers University System (Rutgers)-Rutgers University System (Rutgers), Brookhaven National Laboratory [Upton, NY] (BNL), U.S. Department of Energy [Washington] (DOE)-UT-Battelle, LLC-Stony Brook University [SUNY] (SBU), State University of New York (SUNY)-State University of New York (SUNY), Global Research Center, National Institute of Environmental Research [South Korea] (NIER), and EGU, Publication
- Subjects
lcsh:Chemistry ,[SDU.OCEAN]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Ocean, Atmosphere ,lcsh:QD1-999 ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,[SDU.OCEAN] Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Ocean, Atmosphere ,13. Climate action ,010501 environmental sciences ,01 natural sciences ,complex mixtures ,lcsh:Physics ,lcsh:QC1-999 ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences - Abstract
A new aerosol microphysical module MATRIX, the Multiconfiguration Aerosol TRacker of mIXing state, and its application in the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) climate model (ModelE) are described. This module, which is based on the quadrature method of moments (QMOM), represents nucleation, condensation, coagulation, internal and external mixing, and cloud-drop activation and provides aerosol particle mass and number concentration and particle size information for up to 16 mixed-mode aerosol populations. Internal and external mixing among aerosol components sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, carbonaceous aerosols, dust and sea-salt particles are represented. The solubility of each aerosol population, which is explicitly calculated based on its soluble and insoluble components, enables calculation of the dependence of cloud drop activation on the microphysical characterization of multiple soluble aerosol populations. A detailed model description and results of box-model simulations of various aerosol population configurations are presented. The box model experiments demonstrate the dependence of cloud activating aerosol number concentration on the aerosol population configuration; comparisons to sectional models are quite favorable. MATRIX is incorporated into the GISS climate model and simulations are carried out primarily to assess its performance/efficiency for global-scale atmospheric model application. Simulation results were compared with aircraft and station measurements of aerosol mass and number concentration and particle size to assess the ability of the new method to yield data suitable for such comparison. The model accurately captures the observed size distributions in the Aitken and accumulation modes up to particle diameter 1 μm, in which sulfate, nitrate, black and organic carbon are predominantly located; however the model underestimates coarse-mode number concentration and size, especially in the marine environment. This is more likely due to oversimplifications of the representation of sea salt emissions – sea salt emissions are only calculated for two size classes – than to inherent limitations of MATRIX.
- Published
- 2008
18. Nitrate aerosols today and in 2030: importance relative to other aerosol species and tropospheric ozone
- Author
-
Bauer, S. E., Koch, D., Unger, N., Metzger, S. M., Shindell, D. T., Streets, D. G., Earth Institute at Columbia University, Columbia University [New York], NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS), NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), University of Vermont [Burlington], Max Planck Institute for Chemistry (MPIC), Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Argonne National Laboratory [Lemont] (ANL), and EGU, Publication
- Subjects
[SDU.OCEAN]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Ocean, Atmosphere ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,13. Climate action ,[SDU.OCEAN] Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Ocean, Atmosphere ,010501 environmental sciences ,respiratory system ,7. Clean energy ,01 natural sciences ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences - Abstract
International audience; Ammonium-nitrate aerosols are expected to become more important in the future atmosphere due to the expected increase in nitrate precursor emissions and the decline of ammonium-sulphate aerosols in wide regions of this planet. The GISS climate model is used in this study, including atmospheric gas- and aerosol phase chemistry to investigate current and future (2030, following the SRES A1B emission scenario) atmospheric compositions. A set of sensitivity experiments was carried out to quantify the individual impact of emission- and physical climate change on nitrate aerosol formation. We found that future nitrate aerosol loads depend most strongly on changes that may occur in the ammonia sources. Furthermore, microphysical processes that lead to aerosol mixing play a very important role in sulphate and nitrate aerosol formation. The role of nitrate aerosols as climate change driver is analyzed and set in perspective to other aerosol and ozone forcings under pre-industrial, present day and future conditions. In the near future, year 2030, ammonium nitrate radiative forcing is about ?0.14 W/m2 and contributes roughly 10% of the net aerosol and ozone forcing. The present day nitrate and pre-industrial nitrate forcings are ?0.11 and ?0.05 W/m2, respectively. The steady increase of nitrate aerosols since industrialization increases its role as a non greenhouse gas forcing agent. However, this impact is still small compared to greenhouse gas forcings, therefore the main role nitrate will play in the future atmosphere is as an air pollutant, with annual mean near surface air concentrations rising above 3 ?g/m3 in China and therefore reaching pollution levels, like sulphate aerosols, in the fine particle mode.
- Published
- 2007
19. Simulations of preindustrial, present-day, and 2100 conditions in the NASA GISS composition and climate model G-PUCCINI
- Author
-
Shindell, D. T., Faluvegi, G., Unger, N., Aguilar, E., Gavin Schmidt, Koch, D. M., Bauer, S. E., Miller, R. L., Center for Climate Systems Research [New York] (CCSR), Columbia University [New York], NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS), NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), Dept. of Geophysics, Dept. of Applied Physics and Applied Math, and EGU, Publication
- Subjects
[SDU.OCEAN]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Ocean, Atmosphere ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,13. Climate action ,[SDU.OCEAN] Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Ocean, Atmosphere ,010501 environmental sciences ,01 natural sciences ,7. Clean energy ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences - Abstract
International audience; A model of atmospheric composition and climate has been developed at the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) that includes composition seamlessly from the surface to the lower mesosphere. The model is able to capture many features of the observed magnitude, distribution, and seasonal cycle of trace species. The simulation is especially realistic in the troposphere. In the stratosphere, high latitude regions show substantial biases during period when transport governs the distribution as meridional mixing is too rapid in this model version. In other regions, including the extrapolar tropopause region that dominates radiative forcing (RF) by ozone, stratospheric gases are generally well-simulated. The model's stratosphere-troposphere exchange (STE) agrees well with values inferred from observations for both the global mean flux and the ratio of Northern to Southern Hemisphere downward fluxes. Simulations of preindustrial (PI) to present-day (PD) changes show tropospheric ozone burden increases of 11% while the stratospheric burden decreases by 18%. The resulting tropopause RF values are ?0.06 W/m2 from stratospheric ozone and 0.40 W/m2 from tropospheric ozone. Global mean mass-weighted OH decreases by 16% from the PI to the PD. STE of ozone also decreased substantially during this time, by 14%. Comparison of the PD with a simulation using 1979 pre-ozone hole conditions for the stratosphere shows a much larger downward flux of ozone into the troposphere in 1979, resulting in a substantially greater tropospheric ozone burden than that seen in the PD run. This implies that reduced STE due to Antarctic ozone depletion may have offset as much as 2/3 of the tropospheric ozone burden increase from PI to PD. However, the model overestimates the downward flux of ozone at high Southern latitudes, so this estimate is likely an upper limit. In the future, the tropospheric ozone burden increases sharply in 2100 for the A1B and A2 scenarios, by 41% and 101%, respectively. The primary reason is enhanced STE, which increases by 71% and 124% in the two scenarios. Chemistry and dry deposition both change so as to reduce ozone, partially in compensation for the enhanced STE. Thus even in the high-pollution A2 scenario, and certainly in A1B, the increased ozone influx dominates the burden changes. However, STE has the greatest influence on middle and high latitudes and towards the upper troposphere, so RF and surface air quality are dominated by emissions. Net RF values due to projected ozone changes depend strongly on the scenario, with 0.1 W/m2 for A1B and 0.8 W/m2 for A2. Changes in oxidation capacity are also scenario dependent, with values of plus and minus seven percent in the A2 and A1B scenarios, respectively.
- Published
- 2006
20. Near-surface meteorology during the Arctic Summer Cloud Ocean Study (ASCOS) : evaluation of reanalyses and global climate models
- Author
-
de Boer, G., Shupe, M. D., Caldwell, P. M., Bauer, S. E., Persson, O., Boyle, J. S., Kelley, M., Klein, S. A., Tjernström, Michael, de Boer, G., Shupe, M. D., Caldwell, P. M., Bauer, S. E., Persson, O., Boyle, J. S., Kelley, M., Klein, S. A., and Tjernström, Michael
- Abstract
Atmospheric measurements from the Arctic Summer Cloud Ocean Study (ASCOS) are used to evaluate the performance of three atmospheric reanalyses (European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasting (ECMWF)-Interim reanalysis, National Center for Environmental Prediction (NCEP)-National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) reanalysis, and NCEP-DOE (Department of Energy) reanalysis) and two global climate models (CAM5 (Community Atmosphere Model 5) and NASA GISS (Goddard Institute for Space Studies) ModelE2) in simulation of the high Arctic environment. Quantities analyzed include near surface meteorological variables such as temperature, pressure, humidity and winds, surface-based estimates of cloud and precipitation properties, the surface energy budget, and lower atmospheric temperature structure. In general, the models perform well in simulating large-scale dynamical quantities such as pressure and winds. Near-surface temperature and lower atmospheric stability, along with surface energy budget terms, are not as well represented due largely to errors in simulation of cloud occurrence, phase and altitude. Additionally, a development version of CAMS, which features improved handling of cloud macro physics, has demonstrated to improve simulation of cloud properties and liquid water amount. The ASCOS period additionally provides an excellent example of the benefits gained by evaluating individual budget terms, rather than simply evaluating the net end product, with large compensating errors between individual surface energy budget terms that result in the best net energy budget., AuthorCount:9
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
21. Intercomparison and evaluation of global aerosol microphysical properties among AeroCom models of a range of complexity
- Author
-
Mann, G. W., Carslaw, K. S., Reddington, C. L., Pringle, K. J., Schulz, M., Asmi, A., Spracklen, D. V., Ridley, D. A., Woodhouse, M. T., Lee, L. A., Zhang, K., Ghan, S. J., Easter, R. C., Liu, X., Stier, P., Lee, Y. H., Adams, P. J., Tost, H., Lelieveld, J., Bauer, S. E., Tsigaridis, K., van Noije, T. P. C., Strunk, A., Vignati, E., Bellouin, N., Dalvi, M., Johnson, C. E., Bergman, T., Kokkola, H., von Salzen, K., Yu, F., Luo, G., Petzold, A., Heintzenberg, J., Clarke, A., Ogren, A., Gras, J., Baltensperger, U., Kaminski, U., Jennings, S. G., O'Dowd, C. D., Harrison, R. M., Beddows, D. C. S., Kulmala, M., Viisanen, Y., Ulevicius, V., Mihalopoulos, N., Zdimal, V., Fiebig, M., Hansson, Hans-Christen, Swietlicki, E., Henzing, J. S., Mann, G. W., Carslaw, K. S., Reddington, C. L., Pringle, K. J., Schulz, M., Asmi, A., Spracklen, D. V., Ridley, D. A., Woodhouse, M. T., Lee, L. A., Zhang, K., Ghan, S. J., Easter, R. C., Liu, X., Stier, P., Lee, Y. H., Adams, P. J., Tost, H., Lelieveld, J., Bauer, S. E., Tsigaridis, K., van Noije, T. P. C., Strunk, A., Vignati, E., Bellouin, N., Dalvi, M., Johnson, C. E., Bergman, T., Kokkola, H., von Salzen, K., Yu, F., Luo, G., Petzold, A., Heintzenberg, J., Clarke, A., Ogren, A., Gras, J., Baltensperger, U., Kaminski, U., Jennings, S. G., O'Dowd, C. D., Harrison, R. M., Beddows, D. C. S., Kulmala, M., Viisanen, Y., Ulevicius, V., Mihalopoulos, N., Zdimal, V., Fiebig, M., Hansson, Hans-Christen, Swietlicki, E., and Henzing, J. S.
- Abstract
Many of the next generation of global climate models will include aerosol schemes which explicitly simulate the microphysical processes that determine the particle size distribution. These models enable aerosol optical properties and cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentrations to be determined by fundamental aerosol processes, which should lead to a more physically based simulation of aerosol direct and indirect radiative forcings. This study examines the global variation in particle size distribution simulated by 12 global aerosol microphysics models to quantify model diversity and to identify any common biases against observations. Evaluation against size distribution measurements from a new European network of aerosol supersites shows that the mean model agrees quite well with the observations at many sites on the annual mean, but there are some seasonal biases common to many sites. In particular, at many of these European sites, the accumulation mode number concentration is biased low during winter and Aitken mode concentrations tend to be overestimated in winter and underestimated in summer. At high northern latitudes, the models strongly underpredict Aitken and accumulation particle concentrations compared to the measurements, consistent with previous studies that have highlighted the poor performance of global aerosol models in the Arctic. In the marine boundary layer, the models capture the observed meridional variation in the size distribution, which is dominated by the Aitken mode at high latitudes, with an increasing concentration of accumulation particles with decreasing latitude. Considering vertical profiles, the models reproduce the observed peak in total particle concentrations in the upper troposphere due to new particle formation, although modelled peak concentrations tend to be biased high over Europe. Overall, the multimodel-mean data set simulates the global variation of the particle size distribution with a good degree of skill, suggesting t, AuthorCount:52
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. Modelled black carbon radiative forcing and atmospheric lifetime in AeroCom Phase II constrained by aircraft observations
- Author
-
Samset, B. H., primary, Myhre, G., additional, Herber, A., additional, Kondo, Y., additional, Li, S.-M., additional, Moteki, N., additional, Koike, M., additional, Oshima, N., additional, Schwarz, J. P., additional, Balkanski, Y., additional, Bauer, S. E., additional, Bellouin, N., additional, Berntsen, T. K., additional, Bian, H., additional, Chin, M., additional, Diehl, T., additional, Easter, R. C., additional, Ghan, S. J., additional, Iversen, T., additional, Kirkevåg, A., additional, Lamarque, J.-F., additional, Lin, G., additional, Liu, X., additional, Penner, J. E., additional, Schulz, M., additional, Seland, Ø., additional, Skeie, R. B., additional, Stier, P., additional, Takemura, T., additional, Tsigaridis, K., additional, and Zhang, K., additional
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. The AeroCom evaluation and intercomparison of organic aerosol in global models
- Author
-
Tsigaridis, K., primary, Daskalakis, N., additional, Kanakidou, M., additional, Adams, P. J., additional, Artaxo, P., additional, Bahadur, R., additional, Balkanski, Y., additional, Bauer, S. E., additional, Bellouin, N., additional, Benedetti, A., additional, Bergman, T., additional, Berntsen, T. K., additional, Beukes, J. P., additional, Bian, H., additional, Carslaw, K. S., additional, Chin, M., additional, Curci, G., additional, Diehl, T., additional, Easter, R. C., additional, Ghan, S. J., additional, Gong, S. L., additional, Hodzic, A., additional, Hoyle, C. R., additional, Iversen, T., additional, Jathar, S., additional, Jimenez, J. L., additional, Kaiser, J. W., additional, Kirkevåg, A., additional, Koch, D., additional, Kokkola, H., additional, Lee, Y. H, additional, Lin, G., additional, Liu, X., additional, Luo, G., additional, Ma, X., additional, Mann, G. W., additional, Mihalopoulos, N., additional, Morcrette, J.-J., additional, Müller, J.-F., additional, Myhre, G., additional, Myriokefalitakis, S., additional, Ng, N. L., additional, O'Donnell, D., additional, Penner, J. E., additional, Pozzoli, L., additional, Pringle, K. J., additional, Russell, L. M., additional, Schulz, M., additional, Sciare, J., additional, Seland, Ø., additional, Shindell, D. T., additional, Sillman, S., additional, Skeie, R. B., additional, Spracklen, D., additional, Stavrakou, T., additional, Steenrod, S. D., additional, Takemura, T., additional, Tiitta, P., additional, Tilmes, S., additional, Tost, H., additional, van Noije, T., additional, van Zyl, P. G., additional, von Salzen, K., additional, Yu, F., additional, Wang, Z., additional, Zaveri, R. A., additional, Zhang, H., additional, Zhang, K., additional, Zhang, Q., additional, and Zhang, X., additional
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. Supplementary material to "The AeroCom evaluation and intercomparison of organic aerosol in global models"
- Author
-
Tsigaridis, K., primary, Daskalakis, N., additional, Kanakidou, M., additional, Adams, P. J., additional, Artaxo, P., additional, Bahadur, R., additional, Balkanski, Y., additional, Bauer, S. E., additional, Bellouin, N., additional, Benedetti, A., additional, Bergman, T., additional, Berntsen, T. K., additional, Beukes, J. P., additional, Bian, H., additional, Carslaw, K. S., additional, Chin, M., additional, Curci, G., additional, Diehl, T., additional, Easter, R. C., additional, Ghan, S. J., additional, Gong, S. L., additional, Hodzic, A., additional, Hoyle, C. R., additional, Iversen, T., additional, Jathar, S., additional, Jimenez, J. L., additional, Kaiser, J. W., additional, Kirkevåg, A., additional, Koch, D., additional, Kokkola, H., additional, Lee, Y. H., additional, Lin, G., additional, Liu, X., additional, Luo, G., additional, Ma, X., additional, Mann, G. W., additional, Mihalopoulos, N., additional, Morcrette, J.-J., additional, Müller, J.-F., additional, Myhre, G., additional, Myriokefalitakis, S., additional, Ng, S., additional, O'Donnell, D., additional, Penner, J. E., additional, Pozzoli, L., additional, Pringle, K. J., additional, Russell, L. M., additional, Schulz, M., additional, Sciare, J., additional, Seland, Ø., additional, Shindell, D. T., additional, Sillman, S., additional, Skeie, R. B., additional, Spracklen, D., additional, Stavrakou, T., additional, Steenrod, S. D., additional, Takemura, T., additional, Tiitta, P., additional, Tilmes, S., additional, Tost, H., additional, van Noije, T., additional, van Zyl, P. G., additional, von Salzen, K., additional, Yu, F., additional, Wang, Z., additional, Zaveri, R. A., additional, Zhang, H., additional, Zhang, K., additional, Zhang, Q., additional, and Zhang, X., additional
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
25. Near-surface meteorology during the Arctic Summer Cloud Ocean Study (ASCOS): evaluation of reanalyses and global climate models
- Author
-
de Boer, G., primary, Shupe, M. D., additional, Caldwell, P. M., additional, Bauer, S. E., additional, Persson, O., additional, Boyle, J. S., additional, Kelley, M., additional, Klein, S. A., additional, and Tjernström, M., additional
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
26. Intercomparison and evaluation of aerosol microphysical properties among AeroCom global models of a range of complexity
- Author
-
Mann, G. W., primary, Carslaw, K. S., additional, Reddington, C. L., additional, Pringle, K. J., additional, Schulz, M., additional, Asmi, A., additional, Spracklen, D. V., additional, Ridley, D. A., additional, Woodhouse, M. T., additional, Lee, L. A., additional, Zhang, K., additional, Ghan, S. J., additional, Easter, R. C., additional, Liu, X., additional, Stier, P., additional, Lee, Y. H., additional, Adams, P. J., additional, Tost, H., additional, Lelieveld, J., additional, Bauer, S. E., additional, Tsigaridis, K., additional, van Noije, T. P. C., additional, Strunk, A., additional, Vignati, E., additional, Bellouin, N., additional, Dalvi, M., additional, Johnson, C. E., additional, Bergman, T., additional, Kokkola, H., additional, von Salzen, K., additional, Yu, F., additional, Luo, G., additional, Petzold, A., additional, Heintzenberg, J., additional, Clarke, A., additional, Ogren, J. A., additional, Gras, J., additional, Baltensperger, U., additional, Kaminski, U., additional, Jennings, S. G., additional, O'Dowd, C. D., additional, Harrison, R. M., additional, Beddows, D. C. S., additional, Kulmala, M., additional, Viisanen, Y., additional, Ulevicius, V., additional, Mihalopoulos, N., additional, Zdimal, V., additional, Fiebig, M., additional, Hansson, H.-C., additional, Swietlicki, E., additional, and Henzig, J. S., additional
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
27. An AeroCom assessment of black carbon in Arctic snow and sea ice
- Author
-
Jiao, C., primary, Flanner, M. G., additional, Balkanski, Y., additional, Bauer, S. E., additional, Bellouin, N., additional, Berntsen, T. K., additional, Bian, H., additional, Carslaw, K. S., additional, Chin, M., additional, De Luca, N., additional, Diehl, T., additional, Ghan, S. J., additional, Iversen, T., additional, Kirkevåg, A., additional, Koch, D., additional, Liu, X., additional, Mann, G. W., additional, Penner, J. E., additional, Pitari, G., additional, Schulz, M., additional, Seland, \\O., additional, Skeie, R. B., additional, Steenrod, S. D., additional, Stier, P., additional, Takemura, T., additional, Tsigaridis, K., additional, van Noije, T., additional, Yun, Y., additional, and Zhang, K., additional
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
28. Near-surface meteorology during the Arctic Summer Cloud Ocean Study (ASCOS): evaluation of reanalyses and global climate models
- Author
-
de Boer, G., primary, Shupe, M. D., additional, Caldwell, P. M., additional, Bauer, S. E., additional, Persson, P. O. G., additional, Boyle, J. S., additional, Kelley, M., additional, Klein, S. A., additional, and Tjernström, M., additional
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
29. Evaluation of aerosol-cloud interaction in the GISS ModelE using ARM observations
- Author
-
de Boer, G., primary, Bauer, S. E., additional, Toto, T., additional, Menon, Surabi, additional, and Vogelmann, A. M., additional
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
30. An AeroCom initial assessment – optical properties in aerosol component modules of global models
- Author
-
Kinne, S., Schulz, M., Textor, C., Guibert, S., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S. E., Berntsen, T., Berglen, T. F., Boucher, O., Chin, M., Collins, W., Dentener, F., Diehl, T., Easter, R., Feichter, J., Fillmore, D., Ghan, S., Ginoux, P., Gong, S., Grini, A., Hendricks, J., Herzog, M., Horowitz, L., Isaksen, I., Iversen, T., Kirkevåg, A., Kloster, S., Koch, D., Kristjansson, J. E., Krol, M., Lauer, A., Lamarque, J. F., Lesins, G., Liu, X., Lohmann, U., Montanaro, V., Myhre, G., Penner, J. E., Pitari, G., Reddy, S., Seland, O., Stier, P., Takemura, T., Tie, X., Kinne, S., Schulz, M., Textor, C., Guibert, S., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S. E., Berntsen, T., Berglen, T. F., Boucher, O., Chin, M., Collins, W., Dentener, F., Diehl, T., Easter, R., Feichter, J., Fillmore, D., Ghan, S., Ginoux, P., Gong, S., Grini, A., Hendricks, J., Herzog, M., Horowitz, L., Isaksen, I., Iversen, T., Kirkevåg, A., Kloster, S., Koch, D., Kristjansson, J. E., Krol, M., Lauer, A., Lamarque, J. F., Lesins, G., Liu, X., Lohmann, U., Montanaro, V., Myhre, G., Penner, J. E., Pitari, G., Reddy, S., Seland, O., Stier, P., Takemura, T., and Tie, X.
- Abstract
The AeroCom exercise diagnoses multi-component aerosol modules in global modeling. In an initial assessment simulated global distributions for mass and mid-visible aerosol optical thickness (aot) were compared among 20 different modules. Model diversity was also explored in the context of previous comparisons. For the component combined aot general agreement has improved for the annual global mean. At 0.11 to 0.14, simulated aot values are at the lower end of global averages suggested by remote sensing from ground (AERONET ca. 0.135) and space (satellite composite ca. 0.15). More detailed comparisons, however, reveal that larger differences in regional distribution and significant differences in compositional mixture remain. Of particular concern are large model diversities for contributions by dust and carbonaceous aerosol, because they lead to significant uncertainty in aerosol absorption (aab). Since aot and aab, both, influence the aerosol impact on the radiative energy-balance, the aerosol (direct) forcing uncertainty in modeling is larger than differences in aot might suggest. New diagnostic approaches are proposed to trace model differences in terms of aerosol processing and transport: These include the prescription of common input (e.g. amount, size and injection of aerosol component emissions) and the use of observational capabilities from ground (e.g. measurements networks) or space (e.g. correlations between aerosol and clouds).
- Published
- 2006
31. An AeroCom initial assessment – optical properties in aerosol component modules of global models
- Author
-
Kinne, S., Schulz, M., Textor, C., Guibert, S., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S. E., Berntsen, T., Berglen, T. F., Boucher, O., Chin, M., Collins, W., Dentener, F., Diehl, T., Easter, R., Feichter, J., Fillmore, D., Ghan, S., Ginoux, P., Gong, S., Grini, A., Hendricks, J., Herzog, M., Horowitz, L., Isaksen, I., Iversen, T., Kirkevåg, A., Kloster, S., Koch, D., Kristjansson, J. E., Krol, M., Lauer, A., Lamarque, J. F., Lesins, G., Liu, X., Lohmann, U., Montanaro, V., Myhre, G., Penner, J., Pitari, G., Reddy, S., Seland, O., Stier, P., Takemura, T., Tie, X., Kinne, S., Schulz, M., Textor, C., Guibert, S., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S. E., Berntsen, T., Berglen, T. F., Boucher, O., Chin, M., Collins, W., Dentener, F., Diehl, T., Easter, R., Feichter, J., Fillmore, D., Ghan, S., Ginoux, P., Gong, S., Grini, A., Hendricks, J., Herzog, M., Horowitz, L., Isaksen, I., Iversen, T., Kirkevåg, A., Kloster, S., Koch, D., Kristjansson, J. E., Krol, M., Lauer, A., Lamarque, J. F., Lesins, G., Liu, X., Lohmann, U., Montanaro, V., Myhre, G., Penner, J., Pitari, G., Reddy, S., Seland, O., Stier, P., Takemura, T., and Tie, X.
- Abstract
The AeroCom exercise diagnoses multi-component aerosol modules in global modeling. In an initial assessment simulated global distributions for mass and mid-visible aerosol optical thickness (aot) were compared among 20 different modules. Model diversity was also explored in the context of previous comparisons. For the component combined aot general agreement has improved for the annual global mean. At 0.11 to 0.14, simulated aot values are at the lower end of global averages suggested by remote sensing from ground (AERONET ca. 0.135) and space (satellite composite ca. 0.15). More detailed comparisons, however, reveal that larger differences in regional distribution and significant differences in compositional mixture remain. Of particular concern are large model diversities for contributions by dust and carbonaceous aerosol, because they lead to significant uncertainty in aerosol absorption (aab). Since aot and aab, both, influence the aerosol impact on the radiative energy-balance, the aerosol (direct) forcing uncertainty in modeling is larger than differences in aot might suggest. New diagnostic approaches are proposed to trace model differences in terms of aerosol processing and transport: These include the prescription of common input (e.g. amount, size and injection of aerosol component emissions) and the use of observational capabilities from ground (e.g. measurements networks) or space (e.g. correlations between aerosol and clouds).
- Published
- 2005
32. Soot microphysical effects on liquid clouds, a multi-model investigation
- Author
-
Koch, D., primary, Balkanski, Y., additional, Bauer, S. E., additional, Easter, R. C., additional, Ferrachat, S., additional, Ghan, S. J., additional, Hoose, C., additional, Iversen, T., additional, Kirkevåg, A., additional, Kristjansson, J. E., additional, Liu, X., additional, Lohmann, U., additional, Menon, S., additional, Quaas, J., additional, Schulz, M., additional, Seland, Ø., additional, Takemura, T., additional, and Yan, N., additional
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
33. Soot microphysical effects on liquid clouds, a multi-model investigation
- Author
-
Koch, D., primary, Balkanski, Y., additional, Bauer, S. E., additional, Easter, R. C., additional, Ferrachat, S., additional, Ghan, S. J., additional, Hoose, C., additional, Iversen, T., additional, Kirkevåg, A., additional, Kristjansson, J. E., additional, Liu, X., additional, Lohmann, U., additional, Menon, S., additional, Quaas, J., additional, Schulz, M., additional, Seland, Ø., additional, Takemura, T., additional, and Yan, N., additional
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
34. A global modeling study on carbonaceous aerosol microphysical characteristics and radiative forcing
- Author
-
Bauer, S. E., primary, Menon, S., additional, Koch, D., additional, Bond, T. C., additional, and Tsigaridis, K., additional
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
35. Aerosol indirect effects – general circulation model intercomparison and evaluation with satellite data
- Author
-
Quaas, J., primary, Ming, Y., additional, Menon, S., additional, Takemura, T., additional, Wang, M., additional, Penner, J. E., additional, Gettelman, A., additional, Lohmann, U., additional, Bellouin, N., additional, Boucher, O., additional, Sayer, A. M., additional, Thomas, G. E., additional, McComiskey, A., additional, Feingold, G., additional, Hoose, C., additional, Kristjánsson, J. E., additional, Liu, X., additional, Balkanski, Y., additional, Donner, L. J., additional, Ginoux, P. A., additional, Stier, P., additional, Grandey, B., additional, Feichter, J., additional, Sednev, I., additional, Bauer, S. E., additional, Koch, D., additional, Grainger, R. G., additional, Kirkevåg, A., additional, Iversen, T., additional, Seland, Ø., additional, Easter, R., additional, Ghan, S. J., additional, Rasch, P. J., additional, Morrison, H., additional, Lamarque, J.-F., additional, Iacono, M. J., additional, Kinne, S., additional, and Schulz, M., additional
- Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
36. Supplementary material to "Aerosol indirect effects – general circulation model intercomparison and evaluation with satellite data"
- Author
-
Quaas, J., primary, Ming, Y., additional, Menon, S., additional, Takemura, T., additional, Wang, M., additional, Penner, J. E., additional, Gettelman, A., additional, Lohmann, U., additional, Bellouin, N., additional, Boucher, O., additional, Sayer, A. M., additional, Thomas, G. E., additional, McComiskey, A., additional, Feingold, G., additional, Hoose, C., additional, Kristjánsson, J. E., additional, Liu, X., additional, Balkanski, Y., additional, Donner, L. J., additional, Ginoux, P. A., additional, Stier, P., additional, Feichter, J., additional, Sednev, I., additional, Bauer, S. E., additional, Koch, D., additional, Grainger, R. G., additional, Kirkevåg, A., additional, Iversen, T., additional, Seland, Ø., additional, Easter, R., additional, Ghan, S. J., additional, Rasch, P. J., additional, Morrison, H., additional, Lamarque, J.-F., additional, Iacono, M. J., additional, Kinne, S., additional, and Schulz, M., additional
- Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
37. MATRIX (Multiconfiguration Aerosol TRacker of mIXing state): an aerosol microphysical module for global atmospheric models
- Author
-
Bauer, S. E., primary, Wright, D. L., additional, Koch, D., additional, Lewis, E. R., additional, McGraw, R., additional, Chang, L.-S., additional, Schwartz, S. E., additional, and Ruedy, R., additional
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
38. Nitrate aerosols today and in 2030: a global simulation including aerosols and tropospheric ozone
- Author
-
Bauer, S. E., primary, Koch, D., additional, Unger, N., additional, Metzger, S. M., additional, Shindell, D. T., additional, and Streets, D. G., additional
- Published
- 2007
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
39. Nitrate aerosols today and in 2030: importance relative to other aerosol species and tropospheric ozone
- Author
-
Bauer, S. E., primary, Koch, D., additional, Unger, N., additional, Metzger, S. M., additional, Shindell, D. T., additional, and Streets, D. G., additional
- Published
- 2007
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
40. Do sulfate and nitrate coatings on mineral dust have important effects on radiative properties and climate modeling?
- Author
-
Bauer, S. E., primary, Mishchenko, M. I., additional, Lacis, A. A., additional, Zhang, S., additional, Perlwitz, J., additional, and Metzger, S. M., additional
- Published
- 2007
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
41. What controls the vertical distribution of aerosol? Relationships between process sensitivity in HadGEM3-UKCA and inter-model variation from AeroCom Phase II.
- Author
-
Kipling, Z., Stier, P., Johnson, C. E., Mann, G. W., Bellouin, N., Bauer, S. E., Bergman, T., Chin, M., Diehl, T., Ghan, S. J., Iversen, T., Kirkevåg, A., Kokkola, H., Liu, X., Luo, G., van Noije, T., Pringle, K. J., von Salzen1, K., Schulz, M., and Seland, Ø.
- Abstract
The vertical profile of aerosol is important for its radiative effects, but weakly constrained by observations on the global scale, and highly variable among different models. To investigate the controlling factors, we investigate the effects of individual processes in one particular model (HadGEM3-UKCA), and compare the resulting diversity of aerosol vertical profiles with the inter-model diversity from the AeroCom Phase II control experiment. In this way we show that (in this model at least) the vertical profile is controlled by a relatively small number of processes, although these vary among aerosol components and particle sizes. We also show that suffciently coarse variations in these processes can produce a similar diversity to that among different models in terms of the global mean profile and zonal-mean vertical position. However, there are features of certain models' profiles that cannot be reproduced, suggesting the influence of further structural differences between models. Convective transport is found to be very important in controlling the vertical profile of all aerosol components by mass. In-cloud scavenging is very important for all except mineral dust. Growth by condensation is important for sulphate and carbonaceous aerosol (along with aqueous oxidation for the former and ageing by soluble material for the latter). The vertical extent of biomass-burning emissions into the free troposphere is also important for the profile of carbonaceous aerosol. Boundary-layer mixing plays a dominant role for sea-salt and mineral dust, which are emitted only from the surface. Dry deposition and below-cloud scavenging are important for the profile of mineral dust only. In this model, the microphysical processes of nucleation, condensation and coagulation dominate the vertical profile of the smallest particles by number, while the profiles of larger particles are controlled by the same processes as the component mass profiles, plus the size distribution of primary emissions. We also show that the processes that affect the AOD-normalised radiative forcing in the model are predominantly those that affect the vertical mass distribution, in particular convective transport, in-cloud scavenging, aqueous oxidation, ageing and the vertical extent of biomass-burning emissions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
42. Simulations of preindustrial, present-day, and 2100 conditions in the NASA GISS composition and climate model G-PUCCINI
- Author
-
Shindell, D. T., primary, Faluvegi, G., additional, Unger, N., additional, Aguilar, E., additional, Schmidt, G. A., additional, Koch, D. M., additional, Bauer, S. E., additional, and Miller, R. L., additional
- Published
- 2006
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
43. An AeroCom initial assessment – optical properties in aerosol component modules of global models
- Author
-
Kinne, S., primary, Schulz, M., additional, Textor, C., additional, Guibert, S., additional, Balkanski, Y., additional, Bauer, S. E., additional, Berntsen, T., additional, Berglen, T. F., additional, Boucher, O., additional, Chin, M., additional, Collins, W., additional, Dentener, F., additional, Diehl, T., additional, Easter, R., additional, Feichter, J., additional, Fillmore, D., additional, Ghan, S., additional, Ginoux, P., additional, Gong, S., additional, Grini, A., additional, Hendricks, J., additional, Herzog, M., additional, Horowitz, L., additional, Isaksen, I., additional, Iversen, T., additional, Kirkevåg, A., additional, Kloster, S., additional, Koch, D., additional, Kristjansson, J. E., additional, Krol, M., additional, Lauer, A., additional, Lamarque, J. F., additional, Lesins, G., additional, Liu, X., additional, Lohmann, U., additional, Montanaro, V., additional, Myhre, G., additional, Penner, J., additional, Pitari, G., additional, Reddy, S., additional, Seland, O., additional, Stier, P., additional, Takemura, T., additional, and Tie, X., additional
- Published
- 2006
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
44. Impact of heterogeneous sulfate formation at mineral dust surfaces on aerosol loads and radiative forcing in the Goddard Institute for Space Studies general circulation model
- Author
-
Bauer, S. E., primary and Koch, D., additional
- Published
- 2005
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
45. An AeroCom initial assessment – optical properties in aerosol component modules of global models
- Author
-
Kinne, S., primary, Schulz, M., additional, Textor, C., additional, Guibert, S., additional, Balkanski, Y., additional, Bauer, S. E., additional, Berntsen, T., additional, Berglen, T. F., additional, Boucher, O., additional, Chin, M., additional, Collins, W., additional, Dentener, F., additional, Diehl, T., additional, Easter, R., additional, Feichter, J., additional, Fillmore, D., additional, Ghan, S., additional, Ginoux, P., additional, Gong, S., additional, Grini, A., additional, Hendricks, J., additional, Herzog, M., additional, Horowitz, L., additional, Isaksen, I., additional, Iversen, T., additional, Kirkevåg, A., additional, Kloster, S., additional, Koch, D., additional, Kristjansson, J. E., additional, Krol, M., additional, Lauer, A., additional, Lamarque, J. F., additional, Lesins, G., additional, Liu, X., additional, Lohmann, U., additional, Montanaro, V., additional, Myhre, G., additional, Penner, J., additional, Pitari, G., additional, Reddy, S., additional, Seland, O., additional, Stier, P., additional, Takemura, T., additional, and Tie, X., additional
- Published
- 2005
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
46. Global modeling of heterogeneous chemistry on mineral aerosol surfaces: Influence on tropospheric ozone chemistry and comparison to observations
- Author
-
Bauer, S. E., primary, Balkanski, Y., additional, Schulz, M., additional, Hauglustaine, D. A., additional, and Dentener, F., additional
- Published
- 2004
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
47. The Mt Cimone, Italy, free tropospheric campaign: principal characteristics of the gaseous and aerosol composition from European pollution, Mediterranean influences and during African dust events
- Author
-
Balkanski, Y., primary, Bauer, S. E., additional, van Dingenen, R., additional, Bonasoni, P., additional, Schulz, M., additional, Fischer, H., additional, Gobbi, G. P., additional, Hanke, M., additional, Hauglustaine, D., additional, Putaud, J. P., additional, Stohl, A., additional, and Raes, F., additional
- Published
- 2003
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
48. Aerosol Microphysics in the GISS Climate Model.
- Author
-
O'Dowd, Colin D., Wagner, Paul E., Bauer, S. E., Wright, D., Koch, D., Menon, Surabi, and McGraw, Robert
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
49. Analysis of a summer smog episode in the Berlin-Brandenburg region with a nested atmosphere -- chemistry model
- Author
-
Bauer, S. E., primary and Langmann, B., additional
- Published
- 2002
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
50. Near-surface meteorology during the Arctic Summer Cloud Ocean Study (ASCOS): evaluation of reanalyses and global climate models.
- Author
-
Boer, G. de, Shupe, M. D., Caldwell, P. M., Bauer, S. E., Persson, O., Boyle, J. S., Kelley, M., Klein, S. A., and Tjernström, M.
- Subjects
METEOROLOGY methodology ,CLIMATE change mathematical models ,ARCTIC climate ,GLOBAL warming research ,METEOROLOGICAL precipitation measurement ,ENERGY budget (Geophysics) ,SURFACE energy ,WEATHER forecasting - Abstract
Atmospheric measurements from the Arctic Summer Cloud Ocean Study (ASCOS) are used to evaluate the performance of three atmospheric reanalyses (European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasting (ECMWF)- Interim reanalysis, National Center for Environmental Prediction (NCEP)-National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) reanalysis, and NCEP-DOE (Department of Energy) reanalysis) and two global climate models (CAM5 (Community Atmosphere Model 5) and NASA GISS (Goddard Institute for Space Studies) ModelE2) in simulation of the high Arctic environment. Quantities analyzed include near surface meteorological variables such as temperature, pressure, humidity and winds, surface-based estimates of cloud and precipitation properties, the surface energy budget, and lower atmospheric temperature structure. In general, the models perform well in simulating large-scale dynamical quantities such as pressure and winds. Near-surface temperature and lower atmospheric stability, along with surface energy budget terms, are not as well represented due largely to errors in simulation of cloud occurrence, phase and altitude. Additionally, a development version of CAM5, which features improved handling of cloud macro physics, has demonstrated to improve simulation of cloud properties and liquid water amount. The ASCOS period additionally provides an excellent example of the benefits gained by evaluating individual budget terms, rather than simply evaluating the net end product, with large compensating errors between individual surface energy budget terms that result in the best net energy budget. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.