Search

Leukemic T-LGL (large granular lymphocyte) composed of clonal CD3+ TCR alphabeta+ CD8+ CD57+ cells were compared with oligoclonally CD3+ CD8hi+ CD57- lymphocytes expanded after BMT. Leukemic CD3+ CD8hi+ CD57+ LGL showed several phenotypic differences such as an upregulation of CD16 and adhesion molecules (mainly CD11c, CD58 and CD54), activation markers and an exclusive CD45RA isoform expression. Unstimulated CD3+ CD8+ CD57+ LGL from both leukemic and BMT donors spontaneously developed an ex vivo CTL-like CD3-redirected cytotoxicity but no NK cell activity. Different stimuli (PHA, PMA or rhIL-2) induced similar cytotoxic profiles after a 6-day culture involving a CD3-redirected lysis predominating over a low NK cell activity. However, culture of leukemic LGL with these stimuli allowed either a 2 week persistence (PMA or rhIL-2) of CD8+ CD57+ LGL or their disappearance after 3 days (PHA). Furthermore, leukemic CD8hi+ CD57+ T lymphocytes produced an inhibitor of cytotoxic functions as previously described for BMT recipients' CD8+ CD57+ cells. Thus, despite some phenotypic differences between both cell sources, leukemic CD57+ T-LGL display the same functional characteristics of cytotoxic effector and immunoregulatory T cells as CD8+ CD57+ T cells from BMT recipients which might represent their normal counterpart. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although widely used, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are associated with a high incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) side-effects. Inhibition of the cyclooxygenase (COX) enzyme is the basis for both the efficacy and toxicity of NSAIDs. The discovery of two COX isoforms, constitutive COX-1 and inducible COX-2, has led to the hypothesis that selective inhibition of COX-2 will minimize the potential for GI toxicity without compromising efficacy. The Meloxicam Large-scale International Study Safety Assessment (MELISSA) trial reported here was therefore set up to investigate the tolerability of meloxicam, a preferential inhibitor of COX-2, compared to diclofenac. MELISSA was a large-scale, double-blind, randomized, international, prospective trial, conducted over 28 days in patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis. Patients received either meloxicam 7.5 mg or diclofenac 100 mg slow release, the recommended doses for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Evaluation of the profile of adverse events was the main aim of the trial, together with assessment of efficacy. A total of 9323 patients received treatment (4635 and 4688 in the meloxicam and diclofenac groups, respectively). Significantly fewer adverse events were reported by patients receiving meloxicam. This was attributable to fewer GI adverse events (13%) compared to diclofenac (19% P<0.001). Of the most common GI adverse events, there was significantly less dyspepsia (P<0.001), nausea and vomiting (P<0.05), abdominal pain (P<0.01) and diarrhoea (P<0.001) with meloxicam compared to diclofenac. Five patients on meloxicam experienced a perforation, ulcer or bleed vs seven on diclofenac (not significant). No endoscopically verified ulcer complication was detected in the meloxicam group compared to four with diclofenac. There were five patient days of hospitalization in patients on meloxicam compared to 121 with diclofenac. Adverse events caused withdrawal from the study in 254 patients receiving meloxicam (5.48%) compared to 373 (7.96%) on diclofenac (P<0.001). These differences were attributable to differences in reported GI adverse events (3.02% on meloxicam vs 6.14% on diclofenac; P<0.001). Differences in efficacy, as assessed by visual analogue scales, consistently favoured diclofenac. In all instances, 95% confidence intervals did not cross zero, suggesting a statistically significant effect. However, differences were small (4.5-9.0% difference) and did not reach pre-determined levels of clinical significance. Nevertheless, significantly more patients discontinued meloxicam because of lack of efficacy (80 out of 4635 vs 49 out of 4688; P<0.01). The MELISSA trial confirms earlier studies suggesting that meloxicam has a significantly improved GI tolerability profile in comparison with other NSAIDs, including diclofenac. These results may be important. These results may provide support for the hypothesis that selective inhibition of COX-2 relative to COX-1 might be an effective approach towards improved NSAID therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

S&ELECT is a large-scale, prospective, international, multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, parallel-group trial. Patients with exacerbation of osteoarthritis were treated with the recommended dose of meloxicam (7.5 mg) or piroxicam (20 mg) once daily for 28 days; 4320 patients were administered meloxicam and 4336 piroxicam. The incidence of adverse events was significantly lower in the meloxicam group (22.5%) compared with the piroxicam group (27.9%; P<0.001), mainly due to the significantly lower incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events in the meloxicam than in the piroxicam group (10.3% vs 15.4%; P<0.001), while the efficacy of both drugs was equivalent. Individual GI events occurred significantly less often with meloxicam than piroxicam: dyspepsia (3.4% vs 5.8%; P<0.001), nausea/vomiting (2.5% vs 3.4%; P<0.05) and abdominal pain (2.1% vs 3.6; P<0.001). There were 16 patients with perforations, ulcerations or bleeding (PUBs) of the upper GI tract in the piroxicam group compared with seven in the meloxicam group (relative risk piroxicam:meloxicam = 1.4). Four PUBs were complicated (perforations or bleedings); none of these occurred in the meloxicam group (relative risk piroxicam:meloxicam = 1.9). the outcome of SELECT is consistent with that of the large-scale clinical trial of similar design and size which compared 7.5 mg meloxicam with 100 mg diclofenac in patients with osteoarthritis, and with a previous global analysis of the safety of meloxicam. It adds further data to the proposed relationship between selective inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 and improved GI tolerability of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

The bone marrow karyotypes of three patients with acute myelocytic leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) were studied at diagnosis and revealed, multiple copies of the same chromosomal anomaly, considered as psu idic(21)(q22) associated with other rearrangement(s). The karyotype of a fourth patient with MDS in transformation showed one copy of a dicentric marker presumably derived from a similar psu idic(21) by (tandem?) interstitial amplification of part of its structure, resembling a "homogeneous staining region", and described as der(21)psu idic(21)(q22)hsr(21)(q22). This rearrangement, previously described in isolated cases only, might be considered as recurrent in AML/MDS and associated with an unfavorable prognosis. It is most probably a secondary change, because it was never observed as sole abnormality and the main association, as for trisomy 21, was with del(5q). In the four cases, the number of partial supernumerary segmental 21pter-->21q22 copies, ranged from 2 to 10. The AML1 gene did not appear to be the common target of this amplification because this locus had been lost by the psu idic(21) in one patient

Clinical benefit in oncology patients can only be derived from coordinated and successive experimental trials. The following consensus thus emerged from the working party: The assessment of tolerance during clinical trials requires the actuarial rate of acute adverse events (AE) to be registered and the development of epidemiological structures involved in long-term assessment of AE. Experimental trials have to be assessed according to descriptive epidemiological data (generated in France and Europe) and completed with observational studies on post-marketing medical practice. The principle of an a priori authorization given by the Afssaps for gene and cell therapy trials was legalised in October 2001. The working group spoke strongly in favour of authorizing early trials only validating the process, and for reasonable objectives in terms of viral security assessment of annex therapeutic products. With regard to the development of new antiproliferative agents, the active dose (or optimal biological dose) replaces the maximal tolerable dose. Early efficacy criteria could be biological and specific. With cumulative subacute rather than acute toxicity, these agents can not be properly evaluated with a short term benefit/risk ratio as is done for cytotoxic drugs. Elderly people constitute a fragile, heterogeneous and increasing population, in whom adequate assessment of anticancer agents is mandatory. It is important to promote controlled clinical trials in children and to systematically monitor them over a very long period of time. Only rare tumours may be considered as orphan situations. Finally, a list of all clinical trials conducted in oncology should be made by the Afssaps, with the help of the FNLCC (Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer) who have already begun this work.

Purpose: To conduct a prospective study of primary lymphoma of bone (PLB) comparatively with extraskeletal non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (ESNHLs) and secondary lymphoma of bone (SLB)., Patients and Methods: The 28 cases of PLB, 2932 cases of ESNHL, and 219 cases of SLB included between April 1, 1993, and October 1, 1997, in a treatment protocol for NHL developed by the Adult Lymphoma Study Group, were studied prospectively., Results: Of the 28 PLB patients, 17 were men and 11 women; median age was 48 years (range, 18-69). The disease was monostotic in 17 cases (involving the peripheral skeleton in 14) and polyostotic in nine cases. The proportion of patients younger than 60 years was 86% in the PLB group, 59% in the ESNHL group, and 55% in the SLB group. The Ann Arbor stage distribution (I-II/III-IV) was as follows: 54%/46% in the PLB group, 50%/50% in the ESNHL group, and 20%/80% in the SLB group. Performance status was 0 or 1 in 100% of the PLB patients, 50% of the ESNHL patients, and 20% of the SLB patients. The phenotype was B in 89% of the PLBs and 85% of the ESNHLs and SLBs. In the PLB group, 54% of patients had diffuse large cell tumors and 11% diffuse mixed tumors; in the ESNHL group, 39% had diffuse large cell, 13% diffuse mixed, and 8% diffuse immunoblastic tumors; and in the SLB group, 45% had diffuse large cell, 10% diffuse mixed, and 12% diffuse immunoblastic tumors. A complete or partial response to induction therapy was noted in 86% of PLB patients, 84% of ESNHL patients, and 78% of SLB patients. Overall five-year survival was 65% in the PLB group, 50% in the ESNHL group, and 40% in the SLB group., Discussion: Survival was better in the PLB group. Further studies are needed to determine the effect of radiation therapy at completion of the treatment protocol and to look for prognostic factors associated with bone involvement.

THE SURVEY: To better ascertain diagnostic and treatment strategies used by physicians for idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, a questionnaire was addressed to 298 French hematologists and pediatricians. One hundred and ten responses were analyzed., Diagnostic Approach: Thrombocytopenia was determined on capillary blood samples by 50% of the physicians and platelet-associated antibody by 44%. Bone marrow aspirates were obtained more frequently in adults (85%) than in children (47%) and immune disorders were more often investigated in 95% of adults and in 68% of children., Therapeutics: Treatment threshold was lower in children (20.10(9)/l) than in adults (50.10(9)/l). Corticoidsteroids was the treatment of choice in adults (98%) and children received either IV immunoglobulins (61%) and/or corticosteroids (63%); higher doses were used in children (> or = 2 mg/kg versus 1 mg/kg) for shorter periods (> or = 2 weeks versus > 3 weeks). Treatment failure was evaluated earlier in children (< 10 days) than in adults (> 20 days)., Recommendations: 1. Diagnosis. Based on repeatedly low platelet counts and verification that only platelets are involved. Clinical examination is normal excepting rare cases of severe hemorrhage. Search for antiplatelet antibodies is non-contributive 2. Treatment Short-term corticosteroids, both in children and adults. Intravenous gammaglobulins should be limited to cases with signs of severe hemorrhage. 3. Consult the complete guidelines for each individual clinical situation.

The cause of the rare and severe condition of aplastic anaemia is largely unknown, although certain drugs have been implicated as possible aetiological factors, mostly through the evidence of case reports. A case-control study was conducted in metropolitan France between 1985 and 1988 to investigate aetiological factors in aplastic anaemia. It was conducted in parallel with the establishment of a national register of the incidence of aplastic anaemia, which started in May 1984. The controls used in the study consisted of 2 hospitalized controls (i.e. patients admitted to hospital at the same time as the case) and a neighbour control named by the case. All three controls were matched for age and sex, and were interviewed by the same investigator as the case. A total of 147 cases, 287 hospitalized controls and 108 neighbour controls were interviewed. An association of varying degrees was noted between aplastic anaemia and the following conditions or treatments: clinical hepatitis during the past 6 months; history of chronic immune disorder (mainly rheumatoid arthritis); gold salts and D-penicillamine; colchicine and allo-thiopurinol; acetaminophen and salicylates. This survey confirmed the vanishing role of previously known toxic agents in the aetiology of aplastic anaemia. Some differences observed between the results of the present study and those published previously suggest that targeted studies on each category of drug according to specific disease areas should be initiated.

Merkel cell carcinoma is a neuroendocrine primitive tumor of the skin. We report a case who develops node and visceral metastasis, and dead. The clinical presentation, diagnosis, histology, immunocytochemistry, treatment and prognosis of this tumor will be discussed.

Monosomy 7 was detected in bone marrow cells from three patients, one with myeloid leukemia, and two others with myelodysplastic syndrome following previous chemotherapy. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), carried out with an alphoid DNA probe specific for chromosome 7 centromere, showed that a small marker chromosome present in the tumor cells' karyotype of the three patients, was derived from the missing chromosome 7. In two cases, the marker was a ring chromosome, whereas in the third case it was a tiny dot-like chromosome, unnoticed at first examination on R-banded metaphases. In the three cases, the marker was lost in a proportion of tumor cells. FISH experiments suggested that the marker centromere had undergone structural alterations, with a fluorescence pattern distinct from a normal one. On the whole, these data suggest that: firstly, leukemia-associated monosomy 7 results, in a proportion of cases, from a structural event rather than from simple loss of a whole chromosome 7; secondly, interpretation of interphase FISH must be cautious in monosomy 7 evaluation; and thirdly structural alteration of the chromosome 7 derivative alphoid DNA could explain its propensity to segregate unequally and to be lost at mitosis.

The authors report their experience about 8 cases of nasal lymphomas diagnosed and treated between 1987 and 1993. Behind ordinary symptoms, a very bad forecast lymphoma may be hidden. Histological diagnosis is sometimes difficult and needs voluminous fresh fragments. During the evolution of this affection, local temporary nasal and paranasal remissions are often noted after chimiotherapy and/or radiotherapy, but rapidly appear visceras secondary localisations, suggesting an underestimation of the nasal and paranasal sinuses localisations among the treated non-Hodgkin's lymphomas population.