Search

Copyright of Ethnologie Française is the property of Presses Universitaires de France and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal for Business, Economics & Ethics / Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts und Unternehmensethik is the property of Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This essay reviews the recent book by Harald Atmanspacher and Dean Rickles, Dual‐Aspect Monism and the Deep Structure of Meaning. The essay aims to contextualize and clarify the book's core argument about the theoretical and empirical fruitfulness of decompositional dual‐aspect monism as an intervention into the mind‐body problem that ascribes a pivotal role to meaning. The variants of dual‐aspect monism discussed were developed primarily by physicists, but the essay also highlights the crucial contributions to the argument by the one non‐physicist involved, Carl Gustav Jung, as well as noting the significance of dual‐aspect monism and of the reviewed book for analytical psychology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Linguistische Treffen in Wrocław is the property of Oficyna Wydawnicza ATUT and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Dieser Beitrag behandelt die Forschungsfrage nach der Bedeutung der rumänischen Diakritika im Zusammenhang mit der neuronalen maschinellen Übersetzung mit „Google Translate“ (GNMT). Sind diese Zeichen noch wichtig, um korrekte bzw. verständliche Zieltexte zu erreichen? Haben die fünf rumänischen Diakritika bedeutungsdifferenzierende Aufgaben, so dass man sie im Ausgangstext bei maschineller Übersetzung nicht einfach ignorieren darf? Untersuchungen der Diakritika beim Übersetzen erbrachten einige erstaunliche und wichtige Ergebnisse, welche die Einbettung der Wörter in den Textzusammenhang in den Fokus rücken.

This article is a phenomenology of masculinity, leading into questions of authority and ideology. Phenomenology draws on one's experience, which includes here the author's experience of being drawn to thinkers in the phenomenological and (psycho)analytical traditions, such as Levinas, Freud, Husserl, Heidegger, and Lacan. Recognition is regarded as the key to becoming what we are, in a complex 'thrownness' which we cannot escape. It appears that coming to know one's masculinity (and femininity) is part of this becoming; some things do not change, expressing the inert quality (Hegelian bone-like) and repetitiveness of ideology. Recognition is dependent on who has the authority to recognise the other, and this is explored in terms of the therapist's authority. The importance of openness to the other person, and oneself as a therapist, is seen as crucial in allowing a space for a discovery of embodied meanings. But a longstanding dominant ideology of scientism has led to alienation from such embodiment, and one reaction to this may be an appeal to a kind of authoritarian certainty in politics. Ultimately, we only have ourselves in what appears to be an urgent struggle for free speech in therapies, and in the world. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Alman Dili ve Edebiyati Dergisi / Studien zur Deutschen Sprache & Literatur is the property of Alman Dili ve Edebiyall Dergisi / Studien Zur Deutschen Sprahe und Literatilr and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

O objetivo da pesquisa é expor as considerações que Ludwig Wittgenstein proferiu em suas Investigações Filosófi cas (1952) contra o conceito tradicional de representação [Vorstellung], e mostrar os paradoxos provenientes de tal concepção. A fi m de atingir esse objetivo, serão expostas as características da noção tradicional de representação presente, sobretudo, nas principais correntes da filosofia moderna. No segundo momento, será apresentada a crítica de Wittgenstein à concepção tradicional de signifi cado [Bedeutung], visto que é dessa crítica que o fi lósofo fundamenta suas considerações contrárias à noção de representação, problema central do artigo.

Copyright of Scientific Bulletin of the Politehnica University of Timisoara: Transactions on Modern Languages / Buletinul ştiinţific al Universităţii Politehnica din Timişoara: Seria Limbi Moderne is the property of Politehnica University of Timisoara, Department of Communication & Foreign Languages and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This paper defends Kant against a neo‐Hegelian line of criticism, recently advanced by John McDowell, Robert Pippin, and Sebastian Rödl, targeting Kant's alleged claim that forms of sensibility other than space and time are possible. If correct, the criticism identifies a deep problem in Kant's position and points toward Hegel's position and method as its natural solution. I show that Kant has the philosophical resources to respond effectively to the criticism, notably including the set of claims about the limits of meaningful thought that P. F. Strawson calls Kant's "principle of significance." By Kant's lights, first, the concept "non‐spatio‐temporal form of sensibility" is meaningless, so he cannot meaningfully grant that such a form is possible; and second, there is no need to prove (e.g., from reflection on pure intellect) that non‐spatio‐temporal forms of sensibility are impossible, because insofar as the concept "knowing" means anything, that meaning is provided by our own always‐already‐spatio‐temporal case. An upshot of the argument is that Kant's two "stems" of knowledge or cognition, sensibility and understanding, are merely aspects of a single epistemic capacity rather than each a separate capacity in its own right. Many today are unwilling to take Kant's claims about the limits of meaningful thought at face value, notwithstanding their ubiquity and explicitness. This paper is therefore an indirect argument on behalf of that dimension of Kant's position: We have something significant to lose in not taking it seriously. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article raises the question what is the content of Frege’s infamous notion of Bedeutung? It is claimed that the so–called standard interpretation of this notion – Bedeutung as referential relation between a name and an object – was developed and established evaluating Frege’s ideas in philosophy of language in isolation from his logicist ideas. However, precisely his logicist concerns have motivated Frege’s interest in semantic issues. A broader consideration of Frege’s works reveals an internalist and rationalist notion of meaning, that is based on the context principle, and that should not be reduced to mere reference. The question of the meaning of subsentential components, for Frege, is closely related to the question of the meaning of the whole sentence, that is, the meaning of sub–sentential components should be construed as secondary with regard to the meaning of the whole sentence.

This article wants to give an overview of selected results of a qualitative study which focused on the relevance of the personal relationship between teachers and pupils in religious education. This research tried to access the topic from the student´s point of view. The article describes the characteristics of a successful relationship between students and teachers as well as the relevance of this relationship for the process of learning and the learning gains in classes of religious education. In addition it drafts first impulses for the formation of a good relationship in digital religious education as well as first ideas for the development of a special didactic for digital religious education [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of German Journal of Exercise & Sport Research is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

L'objectif du présent article est de questionner les propos de l'historien Carlo Ginzburg concernant l'influence de la théorie de l'attribution en art de Giovanni Morelli sur la construction de la psychanalyse par Sigmund Freud, ainsi que la pertinence du rapprochement des deux auteurs au sein d'un paradigme épistémologique bien particulier qu'il nomme le paradigme indiciaire. L'article présente tout d'abord la problématique générale, puis la théorie de Ginzburg sur le paradigme indiciaire et celle de Morelli sur l'attribution en art. Cela nous permet ensuite d'aborder directement l'influence que Morelli a pu exercer sur Freud aux premiers temps de l'élaboration de la psychanalyse, notamment autour de la problématique posée par la surdétermination. Nous pouvons trouver l'influence de la méthode de Morelli sur la psychanalyse dans la façon dont Freud va appréhender le problème de la surdétermination du symptôme et dans la manière de considérer la surabondance de détails du matériel clinique qu'offre le patient dans le discours comme un outil précieux de l'analyse plutôt que comme un obstacle. Nous pouvons effectivement retrouver les principes du paradigme indiciaire dans la psychanalyse du fait qu'elle cherche à retrouver une réalité inaccessible au premier abord, celle de l'inconscient, à partir des traces de cet inconscient qui émerge dans le discours du patient. Nous avons ensuite voulu interroger les limites de ce rapprochement, et ainsi déterminer si la psychanalyse telle que Freud l'a conçue relève effectivement d'une adaptation des principes de Morelli à un autre objet, ou s'il n'a fait que s'inspirer des apports théoriques et pratiques de ce dernier, pour ensuite concevoir la psychanalyse comme une méthode dépassant les principes du paradigme indiciaire. Nous avons ainsi pu montrer que la psychanalyse ne se limite pas aux principes du paradigme indiciaire dans son approche de l'inconscient, notamment à partir de l'évolution de la conception freudienne de l'interprétation. The objective of this article is to question the comments of historian Carlo Ginzburg concerning the influence of Giovanni Morelli's theory of attribution in art on the establishment of psychoanalysis by Sigmund Freud, as well as the relevance of the bringing together of these two authors within a very specific epistemological paradigm that Ginzburg calls the evidential paradigm. The article first presents the general problem; it then exposes Ginzburg's theory of the evidential paradigm and Morelli's theory of attribution in art. This allows us to directly address the influence that Morelli could have had on Freud in the early stages of the development of psychoanalysis, particularly around the issue of overdetermination. We can find the influence of Morelli's method on psychoanalysis in the way Freud approaches the problem of overdetermination of the symptom, and in the way he considers the overabundance of clinical material offered by patients in their speech as a valuable tool of analysis rather than as an obstacle. We can, indeed, find the principles of the evidential paradigm in psychoanalysis, because the latter seeks to uncover a reality that is inaccessible at first, i.e., the reality of the unconscious, from traces of this unconscious emerging in the patient's speech. We then wanted to question the limits of Ginzburg's convocation of Morelli and Freud, and thus determine whether psychoanalysis as Freud conceived it is indeed an adaptation of Morelli's principles to another object, or whether he only drew inspiration from the latter's theoretical and practical contributions, in order to conceive of psychoanalysis as a method going beyond the principles of the evidential paradigm. We are thus able to show that psychoanalysis is not limited only to the principles of the evidential paradigm in its approach to the unconscious, by looking, for instance, at the evolution of the Freudian conception of interpretation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article outlines differences between phenomenology and method, with implications for psychotherapy and psychotherapeutic research. Drawing on a study exploring how mental health nurses are therapeutic, we focus on how taking experience seriously is encouraged through being phenomenological. We look at how research method and theory – and fixed beliefs or ideas – tend to constrict language, so that personal (sensual) meaning is lost or curtailed. Being phenomenological instead 'opens up' language and consequently meaning, in an act of truthfulness through speaking one's experience, which we see as both psychotherapeutic and a valid form of research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The unexpected invention of a game with my grandchildren provided a new way of thinking about the nature of such unpredictable moments in therapy. The experience brought together a number of ideas, considered through the view of language taken by Merleau-Ponty where the chaotic primitive layers that pervade language are seen as having primacy over the rules of linguistics such as those set out by Saussure. Saussure is seen as providing a way of understanding linguistic structure whilst at the same time opening a number of ambiguities that then allow a way for thinking about language differently through Merleau-Ponty's emphasis on the usage of language (la parole) as opposed the structural aspects of language (la langue). Initially, Winnicott's ideas around the 'spontaneous gesture' are utilised to help show how this kind of unpredictable expression appears as something alive. Merleau-Ponty then shows how language as gestural phenomena takes hold of us through our bodies. Further questions then arise about the method in therapeutic practice and research. Here, it is argued that when the method is given primacy over experience, we are in a position that seeks the already known, which will not, therefore, permit some new expression to break through. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

"Knowing a Language" addresses a topic that has received attention especially in the analytical branches of language philosophy. First, the paper discusses some prominent analytical observations as well as selected positions in semiotics, semiology, and linguistics before turning to a post-Husserlian response by way of a description of the intentional acts that we cannot but perform when we use language. The holistic, eidetic portrait of language that emerges is conceived within Husserl's extended meaning chain, stretching from nonverbal meaning intention and its presyntactic categorial relations via their displacement by merely verbal sense, Husserl's Bedeutung, to their nonverbal, vividly imaginable, proximate reconstruction in Husserl's Sinn. Meanings are viewed as neither public nor private, but rather as indirectly public on the grounds that they combine of necessity individual instantiations of expressions under the communal coercion of the linguistic linkage compulsion. Thus, the paper provides an alternative explanation of what is involved in knowing how to link the sounds of linguistic utterances with community-sanctioned meanings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of College of Languages is the property of Republic of Iraq Ministry of Higher Education & Scientific Research (MOHESR) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

It is usually thought that synchronicity, characterised as 'meaningful coincidence', is therefore understandable in relation to the concept of 'meaning'. I will explore the largely unhelpful symbiotic relationship between 'coincidence' and 'meaning' by comparing synchronicity with synchoricity - coincidence in space rather than time. These two concepts are often mixed together and I will attempt to describe a 'pure' synchronicity in order to sharpen our sense of how meaning is felt to arise from coincidence. It will then be suggested that the standard concept of synchronicity is mostly psychologically irrelevant and, when adjusted to remove elements which are explained quite naturally by evolutionary theory, we are left with a concept which has implications both for the metaphysical foundations of Analytical Psychology and the individualistic emphasis one commonly finds in the field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Interculturality in Algerian German as a Foreign Language (DaF) Instruction: Significance, Obstacles, and Challenges ABSTRACT: Since the beginning of the 20th Century till now, teaching foreign languages gives a great importance to learn foreign languages and cultures. At the same time, the objective of teaching is not to improve only the oral competencies, but to focus on understanding and perceiving foreign culture by "Interculturality" Interculturality is a method of teaching- learning process, which is a mean that links between knowledge an information with foreign cultures and languages to achieve that demands learning conditions that play a great role to develop "Interculturality" of the Lerner. The objective of this communication is not based on showing the big importance of interculturality but also on showing its successful to apply success during a Germany Course (Lesson) in Algeria and the struggles that face it order to suggest new techniques to improve the learning- teaching process quality. ZUSAMMENFASSUNG: Seit dem Beginn der 80er Jahre interessiert sich die Fremdsprachendidaktik für die Abhängigkeit von sprachlichem und kulturellem Lernen. Das Lernziel bezieht sich nicht nur auf die kommunikative Kompetenz, sondern auch auf das Kulturverstehen, um das Denken und das Handeln einer anderen Kultur zu verstehen und zu erfassen. Interkulturalität verbindet dazu die Kenntnisse und Informationen mit der Fremdkultur und der Fremdsprache. Das sind Wissen lernen, Wissen verstehen und Wissen tun. Daraus sehen die Didaktiker, dass die Landeskunde als Bestandteil des Deutschunterrichts sein soll. Die interkulturelle Verständigung erweist sich auch als ein integrierender Bestandteil des Erlernens und Gebrauchs von Fremdsprachen, denn sie schließt neben der sprachlichen Kompetenz auch die Kenntnis nationalkultureller und sozialer Regeln und gut- ausgeprägtes Empfinden entsprechender Normen ein. Die existierenden Rahmenbedingungen als Hilfsfaktor zum Lehren und Lernen haben dazu didaktische und methodische Funktion zu vereinigen, damit die Lernenden ihre interkulturelle Kompetenz fördern können. Das Hauptziel dieser Kommunikation liegt also nicht nur darin, Bedeutung der Interkulturalität beim Deutschlernen zu zeigen, sondern auch ihre Existenz (Zustand) im algerischen DaF- Unterricht zu analysieren, um neue Lehr- und Lernstrategien zur Verbesserung der Unterrichtsqualität vorzuschlagen.

Copyright of Tekst i Dyskurs is the property of University of Warsaw and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)