Search

The increasing number of nosocomial pathogens with resistances towards last resort antibiotics, like linezolid for gram positive bacteria, leads to a pressing need for screening and, consequently, suitable screening media. Some national guidelines on infection prevention (e.g., in Germany) have already recommended screening for linezolid-resistant bacteria, despite an accurate screening medium that was not available yet. In this study, we analyzed the performance and reliability of the first commercial chromogenic medium, CHOMagar™ LIN-R, for screening of linezolid-resistant gram-positive isolates. Thirty-four pure bacterial cultures, 18 positive blood cultures, and 358 nasal swab screening samples were tested. This medium efficiently detected linezolid-resistant S. epidermidis isolates from pure bacterial cultures and from positive blood cultures with a high sensitivity (100%) and specificity (100%). Among the 358 nasal swab screening samples prospectively tested, 10.9% were cultured with linezolid-resistant isolates (mostly S. epidermidis ). Of note, slight growth was observed for 7.5% samples with linezolid-susceptible isolates of S. epidermidis ( n = 1), S. aureus ( n = 1), Enterococcus faecalis ( n = 4), Lactobacillus spp. ( n = 3), gram negatives ( n = 18). Moreover, few Candida spp. also cultured on this medium (1.4%).

Background: Enterobacter cloacae complex contains nosocomial pathogens responsible for infection outbreaks. Identification at the species level within the E cloacae complex remains difficult. Using whole genome sequencing, our aim was to decipher the transmission routes that led to the death of six of seven neonates who had bacteraemia caused by E cloacae complex isolates in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) over a 13 month period., Methods: In this cohort study, E cloacae complex isolates were taken from 186 newborns in an NICU: 14 were clinical samples (eg, blood cultures), 728 rectal swab samples, and 38 environmental samples (20 from siphons, 18 from incubators, and one from a mattress). The samples were analysed to decipher the possible role of manual cross transmission or environmental source in an outbreak of fatal septic shocks related to E cloacae complex bacteraemia. After the replacement of the incubators suspected to be the reservoir of some outbreak-related isolates on Feb 1, 2018, E cloacae complex strains were screened again for 10 months (503 rectal swab samples from 163 newborns). The 71 E cloacae complex isolates recovered from screening, clinical, and environmental samples across both study periods were compared by whole genome sequencing. The pathogenicity of E cloacae complex isolates responsible for fatal septic shocks was assessed using a Galleria mellonella in-vivo model., Findings: From Dec 9, 2016, to Jan 31, 2018, 249 (34%) of 728 rectal swab samples were positive for E cloacae complex, with 66 (35%) of 186 newborns colonised. E cloacae complex were also recovered from four (20%) of 20 siphons and 11 (61%) of 18 incubators. During this period, whole genome sequencing identified that the isolates responsible for the six fatal septic shocks were all Enterobacter bugandensis. A G mellonella infection model showed a higher virulence of E bugandensis. Genomic analysis highlighted the role of incubators as a long-term reservoir and source of cross contamination, leading to their replacement on Feb 1, 2018. Following incubator replacement, a 10-month follow-up investigation identified a physiological gut colonisation with polyclonal E cloacae complex in 52 (34%) of 163 neonates within a median of 9 days (5-14), but no E cloacae complex-related septic shocks., Interpretation: Despite around 30% of neonates being physiologically colonised with E cloacae complex, fatal sepsis was systematically linked with bacteraemia caused by E bugandensis. Our findings highlight the need for accurate identification methods to detect the hypervirulent species within the E cloacae complex recovered in neonates., Funding: Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests We declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study evaluated the performance of the Novodiag ® CarbaR+ an automated qualitative nucleic acid-based diagnostic assay detecting the bla VIM , bla NDM , bla IMP , bla OXA-48 , bla KPC , bla OXA-23 , bla OXA-58 , bla OXA-24 , and IS Aba 1 associated bla OXA-51 carbapenemase genes and colistin resistance mcr-1 gene from clinical isolates or directly from rectal swabs. Materials and Methods: CarbaR+ was evaluated on 201 clinical isolates and on 100 rectal swabs (80 selected swabs from patients that were evaluated by culture method and/or Xpert Carba-R assay and 20 spiked samples). PCR-sequencing on colonies was considered as the gold standard. Results: The CarbaR+ detected all the variants of the targeted resistance genes (39 bla VIM- , 30 bla NDM- , 20 bla IMP- , 19 bla OXA-48- , 15 bla KPC- , 19 bla OXA-23- , 13 bla OXA-58- , 4 bla OXA-24- , 8 IS Aba 1- bla OXA-51- , and 3 mcr-1 -like genes) with sensitivity and specificity of 98.2% and 99.7%, respectively. On the 80 rectal swabs, 71 CarbaR+ results were fully concordant with the results on selective culture media (66 positive samples with 1 to 3 carbapenemases and 5 negative samples). In eight rectal swabs, CarbaR+ identified additional carbapenemase genes. One false negative result with an Escherichia coli producing-OXA-181 was observed and one CarbaR+ result for OXA-48 was in agreement with Xpert Carba-R assay, without growth on culture media. A concordance of 100% was observed on spiked samples. Conclusions: Novodiag CarbaR+ is a random-access fully automated system that achieves excellent performances for the detection of carbapenemase and/or colistin resistance determinants either from cultured clinical isolates or directly from rectal swabs in 80 minutes.

A novel real-time multiplex PCR assay, BD MAX Check-Points CPO, was evaluated to detect carbapenemase-producing organisms in clinical settings on the BD MAX system. A total of 175 well-characterized isolates (including 123 carbapenemase producers) and 128 rectal swab specimens (including 83 positives) of patients considered at high risk for carriage of carbapenemase producers were included. Bacterial suspensions were used to spike true-negative rectal swabs to mimic a clinical sample. Sample (50 μL), containing either the spiked or the patient's sample, was processed. The BD MAX Check-Points CPO assay detected carbapenemases KPC, VIM/IMP, NDM, and OXA-48-like producers with a high sensitivity and specificity of 97.1% and 98.8%, respectively. Rare variants of the IMP type (IMP-11, IMP-13, and IMP-14) and one rare and distantly related OXA-48 variant (OXA-535) remained undetected. With patients' rectal swabs, sensitivity and specificity were 92.8% and 97.8%, respectively. Failure of detection was due to weak inoculum. The time to result was short: approximately. 2.5 hours for 12 samples (including extraction and PCR). The automated sample-in results-out platform is an efficient, quick, and easy-to-use tool for the detection of the main five carbapenemases. The lack of distinction between producers of VIM and IMP may be limiting in countries where these enzymes are widespread, as in Asia, but not in France, where IMP producers are extremely rare., (Copyright © 2020 American Society for Investigative Pathology and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

An OXA-181 producing Escherichia coli isolate that went recurrently undetected directly from rectal swab sample using Xpert® Carba-R, was successfully detected using ertapenem supplemented broth enrichment followed by culture-based method. Our data suggest that implementation of culture-based methods plus enrichment might be crucial for the efficient screening of patients considered to be at "high-risk" of colonization with carbapenemase producers and who are colonized at low level., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)